Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Public representatives are not above scrutiny. They are elected using taxpayers’ money and are answerable to the people. As citizens, we have every right to ask where public funds went, what work was done, and where the proof is. Threatening legal action for asking questions is not governance, it’s...

116,794 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Now even the mainstream media are starting to notice the machine. #AndyBurnham will walk into Number 10 on the 16th. The promised leadership challenge vanished. No contest. No mandate. No public vote. No scrutiny. Just a managed handover dressed up as democratic process. On Sky, Sophy Ridge and Wilfred Frost practically laughed in Labour MP Gordon McKee’s face as he tried to defend the indefensible. McKee reached for the weakest excuses: Burnham has done Reddit Q&As. Frost pointed out the obvious: Burnham chooses which questions he answers. Ridge added the part Labour would rather ignore: he can simply dodge the questions he does not like, including the ones the public actually want answered. That is not scrutiny. That is a handover. Ridge also highlighted that Burnham has barely done proper interviews at all. Press conferences are not enough, especially when journalists are not allowed to ask questions. Social media appearances are not enough when the candidate can filter the public. Hand-picked questions are not democratic accountability. They are stage management. This is not someone applying to run a residents’ committee. This is the man about to become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. If Burnham should face proper interviews, hostile questions, live scrutiny, unscripted follow-ups and a public that is allowed to hear what he actually believes before he walks through the black door. The staggering part is not only that Burnham has avoided scrutiny. It is that Labour MPs are now tying themselves in knots trying to pretend avoidance is accountability. The machine has moved. The media are finally catching up. And the public will never get a say.

The Heartlands Tribune

83,966 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

🚨 “I’M NOT HERE FOR DRAMA — I’M HERE TO STOP THE BULLYING” Shawn Ryan just drew a clear line — and it matters. This is not influencer theatrics. This is not internet spectacle. This is one man refusing to be silenced by power. Ryan made it plain: he didn’t go looking for a fight. He went looking for answers — the kind every citizen has the right to ask of those who govern them. How wealth is accumulated. How influence is used. How accountability is enforced. And when questions were met not with clarity, but with legal threats, he didn’t fold. He stood. What makes this moment different is not personality — it’s principle. A sitting public official attempted to use status, lawyers, and intimidation to shut down scrutiny. Ryan’s response was simple and unmistakable: Transparency beats threats. Truth beats pressure. He is publishing everything. He is inviting the public to judge the facts for themselves. And he is making clear that criticism of government power is not a crime — it is the foundation of a free society. This is what courage looks like in 2025:• No anonymous smears • No backroom intimidation • No surrender to fear. Just a citizen saying: “You don’t get to bully people into silence anymore.” Whether you agree with every word or not, this principle should unite everyone: Public officials answer to the people — not the other way around. Stand with transparency. Stand with free speech. Stand with those willing to say, “It might as well be me.” Shawn Ryan

Jim Ferguson

18,859 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten