Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Florida Quietly Drops $140 Million Bombshell: State Backs “Unthinkable” Cancer Research Into Ivermectin, Fasting, and Nutrition-Based Therapies That Could Change Everything While federal agencies continue to guard the pharma-dominated “cut, poison, and burn” model, Florida is moving in the opposite direction — fast. Through its Cancer Innovation Fund, the...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

462,787 subscribers

356,709 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikHaberler & PolitikaBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.
0:21

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.

TheLiverDoc™

269,683 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The Remarkable Cancer-Fighting Benefits of Ivermectin • “Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells,” which are often resistant to chemotherapy. • “It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to chemotherapy,” making treatments more effective. • “It makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it’s a radiosensitizer.” • Patients are seeing “tumors shrinking down to almost nothing, liver metastases disappearing, [and] brain metastases disappearing.” “There are over 100 papers on the success of ivermectin and cancer,” but much of this research has been ignored because the drug is off-patent, meaning “no one’s going to make money on it.” Dr. Makis has treated over 1,000 patients using combinations of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and other therapies. Many of his patients, told by their doctors that there was “nothing they can do for them,” are now “cancer-free” or have their “cancer under control.” The success stories are undeniable, and the hope is spreading. MakisMD
4:13

The Remarkable Cancer-Fighting Benefits of Ivermectin • “Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells,” which are often resistant to chemotherapy. • “It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to chemotherapy,” making treatments more effective. • “It makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it’s a radiosensitizer.” • Patients are seeing “tumors shrinking down to almost nothing, liver metastases disappearing, [and] brain metastases disappearing.” “There are over 100 papers on the success of ivermectin and cancer,” but much of this research has been ignored because the drug is off-patent, meaning “no one’s going to make money on it.” Dr. Makis has treated over 1,000 patients using combinations of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and other therapies. Many of his patients, told by their doctors that there was “nothing they can do for them,” are now “cancer-free” or have their “cancer under control.” The success stories are undeniable, and the hope is spreading. MakisMD

TheSkyMeds | Cancer & Parasites Explained

5,144,279 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“You see pink ribbons everywhere... events designed to make large amounts of money” 🚨Before you donate to a cancer charity, hear this. World Renowned Cancer Biologist Professor Thomas Seyfried reveals how fundraising efforts prop up a failed system. Hard earned and well intentioned money goes into “debunked” areas of research.... unknowingly contributing to a system stuck on the old story of cancer. SEYFRIED - “The more money we raise for breast cancer, the more people dying from breast cancer we get.... the money is being misspent on a therapy, or a strategy that's already been debunked” “You have to ask the organizations that raise money... what do you do with the money? Are you investing it in the therapies based on the somatic mutation gene theory? Or are you investing it in programs that recognize cancer as a metabolic mitochondrial metabolic disease.... ” “When you find out that most of the money is going to cancer research involving gene mutations, now you can understand why we have no progress... and we get more and more de-d people year in and year out”.
3:01

“You see pink ribbons everywhere... events designed to make large amounts of money” 🚨Before you donate to a cancer charity, hear this. World Renowned Cancer Biologist Professor Thomas Seyfried reveals how fundraising efforts prop up a failed system. Hard earned and well intentioned money goes into “debunked” areas of research.... unknowingly contributing to a system stuck on the old story of cancer. SEYFRIED - “The more money we raise for breast cancer, the more people dying from breast cancer we get.... the money is being misspent on a therapy, or a strategy that's already been debunked” “You have to ask the organizations that raise money... what do you do with the money? Are you investing it in the therapies based on the somatic mutation gene theory? Or are you investing it in programs that recognize cancer as a metabolic mitochondrial metabolic disease.... ” “When you find out that most of the money is going to cancer research involving gene mutations, now you can understand why we have no progress... and we get more and more de-d people year in and year out”.

Humanspective

20,892 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.
0:59

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.

Joe Tippens

47,858 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?
1:25

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?

Valerie Anne Smith

262,935 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Ivermectin & Fenbendazole Cancer Secrets Revealed w/ Dr. William Makis Remarkable success stories are pouring in from people using Ivermectin and Fenbendazole to combat cancer. Mel Gibson dropped a bombshell on Joe Rogan’s podcast, revealing that three of his friends had “stage four cancer,” and now “all three of them don’t have cancer right now at all.” “And they had some serious stuff going on,” Gibson emphasized. Dr. William Makis, who treated one of Gibson’s friends, has been rigorously researching the anti-cancer potential of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole over the past two years. During that time, he discovered, “There are over 100 papers on the success of Ivermectin and cancer.” “Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells,” Dr. Makis explained, noting that it targets the cells “that chemo can’t kill.” He added, “It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to certain types of chemotherapy.” The benefits extend further. “It [Ivermectin] makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it’s a radiosensitizer,” he shared. Yet, research into these applications has been neglected. “Big Pharma has completely abandoned it. Ivermectin is off-patent. No one’s going to make money on it,” Dr. Makis pointed out. Taking action where others haven’t, Dr. Makis applied his findings to his practice. “I have over 1,000 cancer patients who are on either a combination of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole or Ivermectin and Mebendazole,” he shared. Some of his patients were “given a terminal diagnosis” but are now “cancer-free” or have their “cancer under control.” “Patients, for example, who are taking combinations of chemo and Ivermectin or radiation and Ivermectin are seeing dramatic results that oncologists have never seen, that radiation oncologists have never seen,” Dr. Makis shared. “Tumors shrinking down to almost nothing, liver metastases disappearing, brain metastases disappearing.” “There are hundreds, if not thousands, of testimonials” documenting the success stories of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, Dr. Makis added, offering hope to patients seeking alternatives. He strongly believes that “the future of cancer care is in repurposed drugs.” For more information on the use of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole for cancer, follow Dr. William Makis (MakisMD) on 𝕏. --> MakisMD (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
22:06

Ivermectin & Fenbendazole Cancer Secrets Revealed w/ Dr. William Makis Remarkable success stories are pouring in from people using Ivermectin and Fenbendazole to combat cancer. Mel Gibson dropped a bombshell on Joe Rogan’s podcast, revealing that three of his friends had “stage four cancer,” and now “all three of them don’t have cancer right now at all.” “And they had some serious stuff going on,” Gibson emphasized. Dr. William Makis, who treated one of Gibson’s friends, has been rigorously researching the anti-cancer potential of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole over the past two years. During that time, he discovered, “There are over 100 papers on the success of Ivermectin and cancer.” “Ivermectin can actually kill cancer stem cells,” Dr. Makis explained, noting that it targets the cells “that chemo can’t kill.” He added, “It can also reverse resistance that cancer cells develop to certain types of chemotherapy.” The benefits extend further. “It [Ivermectin] makes cancer cells susceptible to radiation treatment as well. And so it’s a radiosensitizer,” he shared. Yet, research into these applications has been neglected. “Big Pharma has completely abandoned it. Ivermectin is off-patent. No one’s going to make money on it,” Dr. Makis pointed out. Taking action where others haven’t, Dr. Makis applied his findings to his practice. “I have over 1,000 cancer patients who are on either a combination of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole or Ivermectin and Mebendazole,” he shared. Some of his patients were “given a terminal diagnosis” but are now “cancer-free” or have their “cancer under control.” “Patients, for example, who are taking combinations of chemo and Ivermectin or radiation and Ivermectin are seeing dramatic results that oncologists have never seen, that radiation oncologists have never seen,” Dr. Makis shared. “Tumors shrinking down to almost nothing, liver metastases disappearing, brain metastases disappearing.” “There are hundreds, if not thousands, of testimonials” documenting the success stories of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, Dr. Makis added, offering hope to patients seeking alternatives. He strongly believes that “the future of cancer care is in repurposed drugs.” For more information on the use of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole for cancer, follow Dr. William Makis (MakisMD) on 𝕏. --> MakisMD (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,292,906 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. Dr. Sulack Pete "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases." Follow me for more Bombshell. #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure
3:49

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. Dr. Sulack Pete "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases." Follow me for more Bombshell. #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure

Joe Tippens

46,883 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It was great to be in Kansas City today to place the final beam on the brand-new KU Cancer Center building alongside the leadership of KU Cancer Center, The University of Kansas Health System and University of Kansas. As a member of the Appropriations Committee, I have secured $115 million in federal resources to construct and equip this state-of-the-art facility. The center will bring world-class cancer services to the region, creating the very best opportunities for Kansans and Missourians to access cancer treatments and care right here in the Heartland. I have had a dream for our state since before I was elected to the U.S. Senate: that Kansans interested in science, engineering, research and innovation have an opportunity to fulfill their educational potential, build a career and raise a family right here in our state. This project is helping do just that. It is a good thing for our state, and I’m pleased to see the progress being made at the KU Cancer Center.
6:11

It was great to be in Kansas City today to place the final beam on the brand-new KU Cancer Center building alongside the leadership of KU Cancer Center, The University of Kansas Health System and University of Kansas. As a member of the Appropriations Committee, I have secured $115 million in federal resources to construct and equip this state-of-the-art facility. The center will bring world-class cancer services to the region, creating the very best opportunities for Kansans and Missourians to access cancer treatments and care right here in the Heartland. I have had a dream for our state since before I was elected to the U.S. Senate: that Kansans interested in science, engineering, research and innovation have an opportunity to fulfill their educational potential, build a career and raise a family right here in our state. This project is helping do just that. It is a good thing for our state, and I’m pleased to see the progress being made at the KU Cancer Center.

Senator Jerry Moran

13,401 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Mr. Annamalai is a great politician, however, his claims suggesting that 24-hour or 7-day fasting can "kill all cancer cells" are scientifically inaccurate and potentially harmful to patients. 1. The Warburg Effect: It is true that many cancer cells consume more glucose than normal cells. However, they are highly adaptable. Simply "starving" them through fasting does not consistently kill them, as they can often find alternative ways to survive. 2. Fasting is not a Standalone Cure: While research (like that of Dr. Valter Longo) explores how fasting-mimicking diets can assist chemotherapy by protecting healthy cells, it is not a replacement for medical treatment. A 24-hour fast is not a "kill switch" for cancer. 3. The Danger of Misinformation: Claiming a 7-day fast can eliminate "all cancer" is a dangerous overreach. For many patients, prolonged fasting can lead to severe muscle loss (cachexia) and weakened immunity, which are leading causes of death in cancer patients. Conclusion: Nutrition plays a vital role in cancer care, but medical advice should come from oncologists and registered dietitians. Cultural practices like fasting have spiritual value but should not be mistaken for a medical cure for a complex disease like cancer. (Source of video: Sun News)
2:14

Mr. Annamalai is a great politician, however, his claims suggesting that 24-hour or 7-day fasting can "kill all cancer cells" are scientifically inaccurate and potentially harmful to patients. 1. The Warburg Effect: It is true that many cancer cells consume more glucose than normal cells. However, they are highly adaptable. Simply "starving" them through fasting does not consistently kill them, as they can often find alternative ways to survive. 2. Fasting is not a Standalone Cure: While research (like that of Dr. Valter Longo) explores how fasting-mimicking diets can assist chemotherapy by protecting healthy cells, it is not a replacement for medical treatment. A 24-hour fast is not a "kill switch" for cancer. 3. The Danger of Misinformation: Claiming a 7-day fast can eliminate "all cancer" is a dangerous overreach. For many patients, prolonged fasting can lead to severe muscle loss (cachexia) and weakened immunity, which are leading causes of death in cancer patients. Conclusion: Nutrition plays a vital role in cancer care, but medical advice should come from oncologists and registered dietitians. Cultural practices like fasting have spiritual value but should not be mistaken for a medical cure for a complex disease like cancer. (Source of video: Sun News)

Dr Sudhir Kumar MD DM

57,795 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Cancer is “all a big money game, and it’s dollars first, patient outcome second.” Dr Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology “The current idea that cancer is a genetic disease is based on ideology—not on the science.” “Our American society... doesn’t care about prevention because if they did, there would be no obesity epidemic. But there is. So that tells us the society doesn’t really care about cancer prevention.” In Seyfried’s book, “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease,” he argues we should hit cancer where it hurts most by messing with its fuel supply, like using ketogenic diets to cut off the energy that cancer cells need. It’s a way of thinking about the disease that poses bad news to the profits of the cancer treatment industry.
2:46

Cancer is “all a big money game, and it’s dollars first, patient outcome second.” Dr Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology “The current idea that cancer is a genetic disease is based on ideology—not on the science.” “Our American society... doesn’t care about prevention because if they did, there would be no obesity epidemic. But there is. So that tells us the society doesn’t really care about cancer prevention.” In Seyfried’s book, “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease,” he argues we should hit cancer where it hurts most by messing with its fuel supply, like using ketogenic diets to cut off the energy that cancer cells need. It’s a way of thinking about the disease that poses bad news to the profits of the cancer treatment industry.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

618,845 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it. 👇
8:32

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

91,190 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood
1:00

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood

Valerie Anne Smith

198,768 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.
1:47

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.

TheLiverDoc™

193,928 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
8:32

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.

Joe Tippens

74,195 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨 IVERMECTIN AND CANCER: WHAT THE RESEARCH ACTUALLY SHOWS A researcher recently shared what they found after looking into Ivermectin and cancer. They discovered over 300 peer-reviewed papers on PubMed examining Ivermectin in cancer. While most of this research is preclinical (cell lines, mice, and rats), the body of work is extensive and covers many different mechanisms. Key points from the research include: ✅ Ivermectin appears to target cancer stem cells, which standard chemotherapy often does not effectively kill. ✅ It can help reverse multi-drug resistance in cancer cells and may sensitise them to chemotherapy. ✅ It acts as a radio sensitizer, potentially making cancer cells more responsive to radiation. ✅ It can inhibit angiogenesis, limiting the tumor’s ability to form new blood vessels. ✅ It may inhibit enzymes involved in cancer cell detachment and spread, reducing the potential for metastasis. The researcher noted that Ivermectin is an off-patent, low-cost drug. Because of this, there has been little financial incentive to fund large-scale human trials in oncology, which is why most of the data remains preclinical.
5:23

🚨 IVERMECTIN AND CANCER: WHAT THE RESEARCH ACTUALLY SHOWS A researcher recently shared what they found after looking into Ivermectin and cancer. They discovered over 300 peer-reviewed papers on PubMed examining Ivermectin in cancer. While most of this research is preclinical (cell lines, mice, and rats), the body of work is extensive and covers many different mechanisms. Key points from the research include: ✅ Ivermectin appears to target cancer stem cells, which standard chemotherapy often does not effectively kill. ✅ It can help reverse multi-drug resistance in cancer cells and may sensitise them to chemotherapy. ✅ It acts as a radio sensitizer, potentially making cancer cells more responsive to radiation. ✅ It can inhibit angiogenesis, limiting the tumor’s ability to form new blood vessels. ✅ It may inhibit enzymes involved in cancer cell detachment and spread, reducing the potential for metastasis. The researcher noted that Ivermectin is an off-patent, low-cost drug. Because of this, there has been little financial incentive to fund large-scale human trials in oncology, which is why most of the data remains preclinical.

Joe Tippens

20,524 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases."
1:59

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases."

Sense Receptor

228,635 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨World Renowned Cancer Biologist Professor Thomas Seyfried reveals new Ivermectin studies underway for cancer He also presents a new paper on how anti parasitics like Mebendazole and Fenbendazole work Dr. Dominic D’Agostino from University of South Florida mentions he's just received a grant proposal from team DESANTIS, who is investing in Ivermectin and Metabolic Therapies for cancer. D’Agostino - "My Blood Levels of Ivermectin are off the charts" SEYFRIED - "we were planning to do ivermectin studies, but it became such a hot political topic I didn't want to get into it.. but we have a paper in Bio Archives now... it's under review for a bigger journal, on mebendazole the parasite medication" "Knowing that mebendazole targets glycolysis and glutaminolysis pathways... [and] when you put it under calorie restricted ketosis it works really really well" "We haven't tested ivermectin yet but we we have that in the plan" Stunningly, Seyfried mentions how Nutritional Ketosis is the key that unlocks the power of Anti Parasitics.
2:19

🚨World Renowned Cancer Biologist Professor Thomas Seyfried reveals new Ivermectin studies underway for cancer He also presents a new paper on how anti parasitics like Mebendazole and Fenbendazole work Dr. Dominic D’Agostino from University of South Florida mentions he's just received a grant proposal from team DESANTIS, who is investing in Ivermectin and Metabolic Therapies for cancer. D’Agostino - "My Blood Levels of Ivermectin are off the charts" SEYFRIED - "we were planning to do ivermectin studies, but it became such a hot political topic I didn't want to get into it.. but we have a paper in Bio Archives now... it's under review for a bigger journal, on mebendazole the parasite medication" "Knowing that mebendazole targets glycolysis and glutaminolysis pathways... [and] when you put it under calorie restricted ketosis it works really really well" "We haven't tested ivermectin yet but we we have that in the plan" Stunningly, Seyfried mentions how Nutritional Ketosis is the key that unlocks the power of Anti Parasitics.

Humanspective

45,410 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says drpaulmarik: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says drpaulmarik. Yes, ivermectin. Independent Medical Alliance
6:30

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says drpaulmarik: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says drpaulmarik. Yes, ivermectin. Independent Medical Alliance

Jan Jekielek

96,002 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce