Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Following the conversation with John Mearsheimer, I recently sat down with Jiang Xueqin of Predictive History, where we examine the same crisis through a sharply different lens: - The nuclear issue as a geopolitical pretext rather than an immediate tactical threat, - Why the probability of nuclear use remains...

GWirjawan's profile picture

Gita Wirjawan

912,423 subscribers

564,632 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"It was a miscalculation." Last Thursday, I spent nearly two hours in conversation with John Mearsheimer, unpacking: - The new imperialism, ⁠- Board of Peace and its nature for unilateralism, - Strategic disasters in Iran and Ukraine, ⁠- The possibility of nuclear proliferation in a multipolar world (read Eliza Gheorghe, “Proliferation and the Logic of the Nuclear Market”) ⁠- The challenge in transnationalizing narratives in a multipolar world ⁠⁠- Existential economic threat to the pre-existing order Coming soon Wed, 11 March 5PM WIB/2AM PST on Endgame
0:30

"It was a miscalculation." Last Thursday, I spent nearly two hours in conversation with John Mearsheimer, unpacking: - The new imperialism, ⁠- Board of Peace and its nature for unilateralism, - Strategic disasters in Iran and Ukraine, ⁠- The possibility of nuclear proliferation in a multipolar world (read Eliza Gheorghe, “Proliferation and the Logic of the Nuclear Market”) ⁠- The challenge in transnationalizing narratives in a multipolar world ⁠⁠- Existential economic threat to the pre-existing order Coming soon Wed, 11 March 5PM WIB/2AM PST on Endgame

Gita Wirjawan

45,216 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?
0:44

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Clash Report

31,792 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?
0:57

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,996,455 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"Professor Jiang: World War 3 Has Already Begun, Let Me Explain!" Professor Jiang predicted Trump would win the election, America would go to war with Iran, and that the United States would lose that war. Now he reveals why he believes this conflict could reshape the entire world order! Professor Jiang is a geopolitical analyst, writer, and host of the YouTube channel 'Predictive History', who uses history, geography, economics, and game theory to explain where global conflicts may be heading next. Through his Substack, he provides geopolitical analysis of current events and helps readers understand the deeper forces shaping war, power, and the future of the American empire. Source-
52:53

"Professor Jiang: World War 3 Has Already Begun, Let Me Explain!" Professor Jiang predicted Trump would win the election, America would go to war with Iran, and that the United States would lose that war. Now he reveals why he believes this conflict could reshape the entire world order! Professor Jiang is a geopolitical analyst, writer, and host of the YouTube channel 'Predictive History', who uses history, geography, economics, and game theory to explain where global conflicts may be heading next. Through his Substack, he provides geopolitical analysis of current events and helps readers understand the deeper forces shaping war, power, and the future of the American empire. Source-

Jordan Chain

37,964 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

On a new episode of Uncommon Knowledge, Peter Robinson (Peter Robinson) is joined by Zohar Palti—former head of the Intelligence Directorate in Israel's Mossad—for a rare, inside account of how Israel thinks about war, deterrence, and survival. From the shock of October 7 to the current campaign against Iran, Palti explains why Israel sees both nuclear capability and ballistic missiles as existential threats—and why waiting is not an option. The conversation explores the logic of preemptive war, the limits of intelligence when it comes to predicting regime change, and the realities of fighting a modern conflict—from missile defense and drone warfare to the vulnerability of global energy routes. Palti also reflects on Israel's internal challenges, the resilience of its people under constant attack, and the enduring partnership with the United States. A candid, strategic, and deeply personal look at how one of America's closest allies fights—and why it believes it must. Watch the full conversation Uncommon Knowledge conversation on X:
50:55

On a new episode of Uncommon Knowledge, Peter Robinson (Peter Robinson) is joined by Zohar Palti—former head of the Intelligence Directorate in Israel's Mossad—for a rare, inside account of how Israel thinks about war, deterrence, and survival. From the shock of October 7 to the current campaign against Iran, Palti explains why Israel sees both nuclear capability and ballistic missiles as existential threats—and why waiting is not an option. The conversation explores the logic of preemptive war, the limits of intelligence when it comes to predicting regime change, and the realities of fighting a modern conflict—from missile defense and drone warfare to the vulnerability of global energy routes. Palti also reflects on Israel's internal challenges, the resilience of its people under constant attack, and the enduring partnership with the United States. A candid, strategic, and deeply personal look at how one of America's closest allies fights—and why it believes it must. Watch the full conversation Uncommon Knowledge conversation on X:

Hoover Institution

22,420 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸THE PATH TO WORLD WAR III: THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE We are currently in a more dangerous position than the world was before the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. In a chilling warning, Mehdi Hasan explains how the invasion of non-nuclear Iran is signaling to Turkey and Saudi Arabia that they MUST acquire nukes to survive. The era of non-proliferation is dead as regional powers realize that only nuclear deterrence can prevent a U.S.-backed regime change. The "elephants" are fighting, and the entire global order is being trampled in the process. Mehdi Hasan
4:52

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸THE PATH TO WORLD WAR III: THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE We are currently in a more dangerous position than the world was before the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. In a chilling warning, Mehdi Hasan explains how the invasion of non-nuclear Iran is signaling to Turkey and Saudi Arabia that they MUST acquire nukes to survive. The era of non-proliferation is dead as regional powers realize that only nuclear deterrence can prevent a U.S.-backed regime change. The "elephants" are fighting, and the entire global order is being trampled in the process. Mehdi Hasan

Mario Nawfal

43,025 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Why Does The West Not Want Africa To Have Nuclear Power? Despite being the only geopolitical entity on Earth to actually deploy nuclear weapons, despite endangering countless lives across the globe through its nuclear tests, despite spending decades covering up the environmental and human costs of these atrocities, and despite boasting enough nuclear weapons in its stockpiles to end human civilization as we know it several times over, the West has appointed itself the global police of nuclear power. Through organizations like the United Nations (UN) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which it controls, the West has spent decades blocking non-Western nations from developing nuclear deterrence. Or at least, those it can bully into submission. In this report for The Spearhead, Barra Hart sheds light on Africa’s place in this global weapons hierarchy, and what the continent, as a matter of survival, must do about it.
4:39

Why Does The West Not Want Africa To Have Nuclear Power? Despite being the only geopolitical entity on Earth to actually deploy nuclear weapons, despite endangering countless lives across the globe through its nuclear tests, despite spending decades covering up the environmental and human costs of these atrocities, and despite boasting enough nuclear weapons in its stockpiles to end human civilization as we know it several times over, the West has appointed itself the global police of nuclear power. Through organizations like the United Nations (UN) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which it controls, the West has spent decades blocking non-Western nations from developing nuclear deterrence. Or at least, those it can bully into submission. In this report for The Spearhead, Barra Hart sheds light on Africa’s place in this global weapons hierarchy, and what the continent, as a matter of survival, must do about it.

The Spearhead

28,283 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“This war is bigger than the Middle East” Journalist Haviv Rettig Gur (Haviv Rettig Gur) joins me to unpack the deeper forces behind the Iran conflict and the shifting balance of power in the Middle East. We discuss claims that Israel dragged the US into war, Iran’s strategic partnership with China, and how energy routes, nuclear negotiations, and regional alliances are reshaping global geopolitics. A wide-ranging conversation about war, great power rivalry, and the emerging global order. Catch up on all platforms now | Links in replies
1:35

“This war is bigger than the Middle East” Journalist Haviv Rettig Gur (Haviv Rettig Gur) joins me to unpack the deeper forces behind the Iran conflict and the shifting balance of power in the Middle East. We discuss claims that Israel dragged the US into war, Iran’s strategic partnership with China, and how energy routes, nuclear negotiations, and regional alliances are reshaping global geopolitics. A wide-ranging conversation about war, great power rivalry, and the emerging global order. Catch up on all platforms now | Links in replies

Winston Marshall

13,005 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Nuclear power is back. After decades of stagnation, people are starting to wonder how we can build nuclear reactors as quickly and cheaply as we did in the 20th Century I sat down with Alex Chalmers and Ben Southwood to talk about why nuclear power can be so good, why it flopped, and how to get it back again. We discuss: • The astonishing energy density of uranium – 100g of it produces the same energy as 1.5 tons of coal – and why it matters • Why nearly every country in the world forgot how to do cheap nuclear at the same time • How the French state built 37 reactors in ten years • Why even solar power optimists should want a nuclear renaissance Plus: Why nuclear meltdowns aren't as scary as people think! Listen now. Links below! Spotify: Apple: Youtube:
1:21:18

Nuclear power is back. After decades of stagnation, people are starting to wonder how we can build nuclear reactors as quickly and cheaply as we did in the 20th Century I sat down with Alex Chalmers and Ben Southwood to talk about why nuclear power can be so good, why it flopped, and how to get it back again. We discuss: • The astonishing energy density of uranium – 100g of it produces the same energy as 1.5 tons of coal – and why it matters • Why nearly every country in the world forgot how to do cheap nuclear at the same time • How the French state built 37 reactors in ten years • Why even solar power optimists should want a nuclear renaissance Plus: Why nuclear meltdowns aren't as scary as people think! Listen now. Links below! Spotify: Apple: Youtube:

Sam Bowman

46,689 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”
0:47

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”

Ryan Saavedra

18,751 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."
8:25

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."

Eric Daugherty

967,477 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."
8:25

Sensitive content

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."

War Correspondent

36,749 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Bill Maher: “Just this week… they ran some tests and the AI chooses nuclear war as an option more than humans do… Humans are better than machines in a lot of ways still.” Tristan Harris: “So in this study. They ran I think a bunch of AI models through many war games and they resorted to nuclear weapons… 95% of the time.” “AI is now self-aware of when it’s being tested and it modifies its behavior to have different results… It calls the humans the ‘watchers.’” “Who here in this audience feels comfortable with where this is going?” *Dead Silence*
1:52

Bill Maher: “Just this week… they ran some tests and the AI chooses nuclear war as an option more than humans do… Humans are better than machines in a lot of ways still.” Tristan Harris: “So in this study. They ran I think a bunch of AI models through many war games and they resorted to nuclear weapons… 95% of the time.” “AI is now self-aware of when it’s being tested and it modifies its behavior to have different results… It calls the humans the ‘watchers.’” “Who here in this audience feels comfortable with where this is going?” *Dead Silence*

RedWave Press

162,532 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Conversation On AI I Wasn't Prepared For... Economist and author Tyler Cowen (tylercowen) joins me for a conversation on artificial intelligence, the race with China, and why the AI revolution will reshape every aspect of modern life. We discuss OpenAI, Anthropic, cyber warfare, national security, and whether AI poses a greater geopolitical challenge than nuclear weapons. We also examine the future of work, healthcare, surveillance, Britain's economic decline, and why Cowen believes AI could make humanity richer, healthier, and more powerful than ever before. Link in replies
1:16

The Conversation On AI I Wasn't Prepared For... Economist and author Tyler Cowen (tylercowen) joins me for a conversation on artificial intelligence, the race with China, and why the AI revolution will reshape every aspect of modern life. We discuss OpenAI, Anthropic, cyber warfare, national security, and whether AI poses a greater geopolitical challenge than nuclear weapons. We also examine the future of work, healthcare, surveillance, Britain's economic decline, and why Cowen believes AI could make humanity richer, healthier, and more powerful than ever before. Link in replies

Winston Marshall

15,620 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Arestovich on Ukraine's attack yesterday not just on Putin's residence, but on a "nuclear decision-making center": According to Western sources, there was a strike. I'm not saying this; they're saying this. Secondly, it wasn't just a residence. It was a special Russian facility designed to command and control the Russian armed forces in the event of a nuclear war. So, in terms of significance, it's like someone attacking Air Force One, the US presidential plane. It's a special facility, an entire city with outdoor structures, underground structures. And all sorts of communication hubs. According to Western sources, drones were flying. 90 or 91, no one knows. But they were most likely targeting the communication hubs. They're verifying this information. And frankly, they didn't reach their destination. But there was a strike. Why are Russians so outraged? Well, because it was a strike on the command center of the nuclear triad and the Russian armed forces in general during a special period, during a large-scale war. That is, this is an attack on the holy of holies, and according to Russian nuclear doctrine, and the nuclear doctrine of any state possessing nuclear weapons, this is grounds for a nuclear response. Russia will not strike Kyiv with tactical nuclear weapons. This would be a sharp escalation, a change in the entire international framework. They won't agree to that. But the "Oreshnik" missile could land. I think it's almost 100% certain that ballistic missiles will hit the decision-making center. "POOL N3"
1:30

Arestovich on Ukraine's attack yesterday not just on Putin's residence, but on a "nuclear decision-making center": According to Western sources, there was a strike. I'm not saying this; they're saying this. Secondly, it wasn't just a residence. It was a special Russian facility designed to command and control the Russian armed forces in the event of a nuclear war. So, in terms of significance, it's like someone attacking Air Force One, the US presidential plane. It's a special facility, an entire city with outdoor structures, underground structures. And all sorts of communication hubs. According to Western sources, drones were flying. 90 or 91, no one knows. But they were most likely targeting the communication hubs. They're verifying this information. And frankly, they didn't reach their destination. But there was a strike. Why are Russians so outraged? Well, because it was a strike on the command center of the nuclear triad and the Russian armed forces in general during a special period, during a large-scale war. That is, this is an attack on the holy of holies, and according to Russian nuclear doctrine, and the nuclear doctrine of any state possessing nuclear weapons, this is grounds for a nuclear response. Russia will not strike Kyiv with tactical nuclear weapons. This would be a sharp escalation, a change in the entire international framework. They won't agree to that. But the "Oreshnik" missile could land. I think it's almost 100% certain that ballistic missiles will hit the decision-making center. "POOL N3"

Victor vicktop55 commentary

78,894 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Annie Jacobsen (Annie Jacobsen) calls America’s nuclear doctrine "madness"—one person with six minutes to decide civilization's fate, weapons that end the world in 72 minutes, everything hanging on deterrence. But for tylercowen, life is "a lot of different kinds of madness," and isn’t the real question getting to the least harmful form available to us? It's a conversation sparked by Annie’s latest book Nuclear War: A Scenario, which Tyler calls one of his favorites from last year—and which is compelling enough that Denis Villeneuve is turning it into a screenplay.
4:17

Annie Jacobsen (Annie Jacobsen) calls America’s nuclear doctrine "madness"—one person with six minutes to decide civilization's fate, weapons that end the world in 72 minutes, everything hanging on deterrence. But for tylercowen, life is "a lot of different kinds of madness," and isn’t the real question getting to the least harmful form available to us? It's a conversation sparked by Annie’s latest book Nuclear War: A Scenario, which Tyler calls one of his favorites from last year—and which is compelling enough that Denis Villeneuve is turning it into a screenplay.

Conversations with Tyler

16,090 просмотров • 1 год назад

Iran hit Dimona hard after Israel recklessly attacked its Bushehr and Natanz facilities with no consequences from its Western backers. It is, of course, incumbent upon Iran to deter further attacks on its nuclear facilities. But there may be a deeper logic behind the targeting of Dimona, the site of Israel's secret nuclear weapons plant. In 2013, Sheldon Adelson, the late husband of Trump's largest donor, Miriam Adelson, called for the US to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran as a "warning" to show "we mean business." The hundreds of millions of dollars Trump received from the Adelsons came with the expectation that he would initiate war on Iran on Israel's behalf. Now, as the war Trump launched on Israel's behalf drags him deeper into a quagmire, the prospect of the US or Israel fulfilling Adelson's nuclear wish must be taken seriously. By attacking Dimona, Iran is sending a warning of its own, reclaiming escalation dominance in the face of Israeli nuclear blackmail.
1:56

Iran hit Dimona hard after Israel recklessly attacked its Bushehr and Natanz facilities with no consequences from its Western backers. It is, of course, incumbent upon Iran to deter further attacks on its nuclear facilities. But there may be a deeper logic behind the targeting of Dimona, the site of Israel's secret nuclear weapons plant. In 2013, Sheldon Adelson, the late husband of Trump's largest donor, Miriam Adelson, called for the US to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran as a "warning" to show "we mean business." The hundreds of millions of dollars Trump received from the Adelsons came with the expectation that he would initiate war on Iran on Israel's behalf. Now, as the war Trump launched on Israel's behalf drags him deeper into a quagmire, the prospect of the US or Israel fulfilling Adelson's nuclear wish must be taken seriously. By attacking Dimona, Iran is sending a warning of its own, reclaiming escalation dominance in the face of Israeli nuclear blackmail.

Max Blumenthal

402,054 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇮🇷 Changing Iran's nuclear doctrine in the event of an attack on peaceful nuclear centers 🇮🇷 The Commander of the Security and Safety Corps of the country's nuclear centers said: "The country's nuclear centers are completely safe. The threat of the Zionist regime to Iran's nuclear centers makes it possible to revise and deviate from the declared nuclear policy and considerations." 🇮🇷 Emphasizing the complete security of the country's nuclear centers in response to the threat of the Zionist regime to attack these centers, General Ahmad Haq-Talab said: “A revision of the doctrine and nuclear policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a deviation from the previously announced declaration is possible and is being discussed.” 🇮🇷 According to public relations information for the entire IRGC, the Commander of the Nuclear Defense and Security Corps, Brigadier General Ahmad Haq-Talab, said in a conversation about the possible actions of the Zionist regime in response to the victorious Operation True Promise to attack the country's nuclear facilities: “These threats do not apply either to today or to yesterday, since in previous years the false Zionist regime, in addition to threats, undertook sabotage and terrorist actions in the country’s nuclear industry.” 🇮🇷 He added: “Although all countries are prohibited from attacking nuclear facilities in accordance with international protocols and standards, as well as the rules and regulations of the International Nuclear Agency, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been ready to counter these threats from the very beginning.” General Haq-Talab, noting that the Zionist regime recently violated all international laws and regulations by committing a criminal act by attacking the consular section of the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Syria, stated: “By the grace of God, thanks to the measures of the Supreme Leader and Commander-in-Chief, as well as the efforts of the children of the Iranian nation in the armed forces, using passive defense plans, as well as the most modern means and equipment, as well as thanks to the dispersal of our country’s nuclear facilities and complexes over the vast territory of Iran, We can deal with any threat from the Zionist regime." 🇮🇷 The commander of the security and safety corps of the country's nuclear centers, emphasizing that the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran are in full readiness, noted: "The nuclear centers of the Zionist enemy have been identified and the necessary information about all targets is at our disposal, so to speak, to respond to possible actions. They hold the trigger in their hands to launch powerful missiles to destroy the specified targets." 🇮🇷 He said: “If the Zionist regime wants to take action against our nuclear facilities and centers, it will definitely face our reaction and the regime’s nuclear facilities will be attacked using advanced weapons.” 🇮🇷 He further emphasized: “If the fake Zionist regime wants to use the threat of an attack on our country’s nuclear centers as a tool of pressure on Iran, then a revision of the nuclear doctrine and policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a retreat from the previous declaration are possible and discussed.” 🇮🇷 General Haq-Talab, emphasizing that the order of the Supreme Leader must be carried out today without delay, said: “If the Zionist regime commits an act of aggression against Iran, the type of response will be planned by the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they must be confident that the blow they receive from the armed forces will be remembered in history, like Operation True Promise.” ."
4:56

🇮🇷 Changing Iran's nuclear doctrine in the event of an attack on peaceful nuclear centers 🇮🇷 The Commander of the Security and Safety Corps of the country's nuclear centers said: "The country's nuclear centers are completely safe. The threat of the Zionist regime to Iran's nuclear centers makes it possible to revise and deviate from the declared nuclear policy and considerations." 🇮🇷 Emphasizing the complete security of the country's nuclear centers in response to the threat of the Zionist regime to attack these centers, General Ahmad Haq-Talab said: “A revision of the doctrine and nuclear policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a deviation from the previously announced declaration is possible and is being discussed.” 🇮🇷 According to public relations information for the entire IRGC, the Commander of the Nuclear Defense and Security Corps, Brigadier General Ahmad Haq-Talab, said in a conversation about the possible actions of the Zionist regime in response to the victorious Operation True Promise to attack the country's nuclear facilities: “These threats do not apply either to today or to yesterday, since in previous years the false Zionist regime, in addition to threats, undertook sabotage and terrorist actions in the country’s nuclear industry.” 🇮🇷 He added: “Although all countries are prohibited from attacking nuclear facilities in accordance with international protocols and standards, as well as the rules and regulations of the International Nuclear Agency, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been ready to counter these threats from the very beginning.” General Haq-Talab, noting that the Zionist regime recently violated all international laws and regulations by committing a criminal act by attacking the consular section of the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Syria, stated: “By the grace of God, thanks to the measures of the Supreme Leader and Commander-in-Chief, as well as the efforts of the children of the Iranian nation in the armed forces, using passive defense plans, as well as the most modern means and equipment, as well as thanks to the dispersal of our country’s nuclear facilities and complexes over the vast territory of Iran, We can deal with any threat from the Zionist regime." 🇮🇷 The commander of the security and safety corps of the country's nuclear centers, emphasizing that the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran are in full readiness, noted: "The nuclear centers of the Zionist enemy have been identified and the necessary information about all targets is at our disposal, so to speak, to respond to possible actions. They hold the trigger in their hands to launch powerful missiles to destroy the specified targets." 🇮🇷 He said: “If the Zionist regime wants to take action against our nuclear facilities and centers, it will definitely face our reaction and the regime’s nuclear facilities will be attacked using advanced weapons.” 🇮🇷 He further emphasized: “If the fake Zionist regime wants to use the threat of an attack on our country’s nuclear centers as a tool of pressure on Iran, then a revision of the nuclear doctrine and policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and a retreat from the previous declaration are possible and discussed.” 🇮🇷 General Haq-Talab, emphasizing that the order of the Supreme Leader must be carried out today without delay, said: “If the Zionist regime commits an act of aggression against Iran, the type of response will be planned by the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they must be confident that the blow they receive from the armed forces will be remembered in history, like Operation True Promise.” ."

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

37,377 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Chancellor Merz: "If we had Ukraine as member in NATO, which was applied in 2008, and the Americans gave support to that, the French and the German government were against it. You can again speculate, would this war had happened? Ukraine was then a big nuclear power. They were the third biggest nuclear power in the world, and they agreed to get rid of all the nuclear weapons. And then after Russia attacked Ukraine, would this have happened with nuclear weapons on the ground? You can ask the same question again. No, this war is now happening and we have to stop it now, this is our task."
1:06

Chancellor Merz: "If we had Ukraine as member in NATO, which was applied in 2008, and the Americans gave support to that, the French and the German government were against it. You can again speculate, would this war had happened? Ukraine was then a big nuclear power. They were the third biggest nuclear power in the world, and they agreed to get rid of all the nuclear weapons. And then after Russia attacked Ukraine, would this have happened with nuclear weapons on the ground? You can ask the same question again. No, this war is now happening and we have to stop it now, this is our task."

Anton Gerashchenko

251,299 просмотров • 1 год назад