正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨🚨 FOLLOW-UP: HOLDEN THORP'S LEGITIMIZATION MACHINE EXPOSED While Ioannidis Faced Death Threats to His Family & Career Destruction for Questioning Lockdowns, Thorp Used Science Magazine to Champion Them Prof. John Ioannidis (Stanford University) in his own words: “Death threats were very commonplace.” “Also to you? Of course. I think...

SciGuardians's profile picture

ScienceGuardians

7,215 subscribers

34,988 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya just pledged to support dissident scientists in his Senate confirmation hearing: “Dissent is the very essence of science.” “23% of Americans have not much or no confidence at all … in scientists to act in the public’s best interests.” “I have five concrete goals if confirmed as Director of the NIH.” “First, NIH research should focus on research that solves the American chronic disease crisis.” “Life expectancy flatlined between 2012 and 2019, plummeted during the pandemic, and still has not bounced back.” “The chronic disease crisis is severe, with hundreds of millions of Americans—children and adults—suffering from obesity, heart disease, cancer and more.” “Second, NIH-supported science should be replicable, reproducible, and generalizable.” “Unfortunately, much bought modern biomedical science fails this basic test.” “Third, if confirmed, I will establish a culture of respect for free speech in science and scientific dissent at the NIH.” “Over the last few years, top NIH officials oversaw a culture of cover-up, obfuscation, and a lack of tolerance for ideas that differ from theirs.” “Fourth, the NIH must recommit to its mission to fund the most innovative biomedical research agenda possible to improve American health.” “Fifth, the NIH must embrace, and vigorously regulate, risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic.” “If confirmed, I'll carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to Make America Healthy Again.” Jay Bhattacharya
4:59

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya just pledged to support dissident scientists in his Senate confirmation hearing: “Dissent is the very essence of science.” “23% of Americans have not much or no confidence at all … in scientists to act in the public’s best interests.” “I have five concrete goals if confirmed as Director of the NIH.” “First, NIH research should focus on research that solves the American chronic disease crisis.” “Life expectancy flatlined between 2012 and 2019, plummeted during the pandemic, and still has not bounced back.” “The chronic disease crisis is severe, with hundreds of millions of Americans—children and adults—suffering from obesity, heart disease, cancer and more.” “Second, NIH-supported science should be replicable, reproducible, and generalizable.” “Unfortunately, much bought modern biomedical science fails this basic test.” “Third, if confirmed, I will establish a culture of respect for free speech in science and scientific dissent at the NIH.” “Over the last few years, top NIH officials oversaw a culture of cover-up, obfuscation, and a lack of tolerance for ideas that differ from theirs.” “Fourth, the NIH must recommit to its mission to fund the most innovative biomedical research agenda possible to improve American health.” “Fifth, the NIH must embrace, and vigorously regulate, risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic.” “If confirmed, I'll carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to Make America Healthy Again.” Jay Bhattacharya

Holden Culotta

203,693 次观看 • 1 年前

To justify mRNA vaccine mandates, Americans were told the shots would stop infection, block transmission, and end the spread of COVID. None of that was true, and Fauci knew it. Trust collapsed not because Americans became “anti-science,” but because Fauci misled the public, moved the goalposts, and worked with Big Tech to silence dissent. In August 2022, Fauci wrote in his own diary that he pushed the CDC to avoid saying the vaccines were “not effective at all in preventing infection and transmission.” Why? Because it “would undermine the DOJ’s efforts at mandates.” He suppressed the truth to protect the mandates, not the public. Meanwhile, the people chanting “trust the science” were silencing scientists: Dr. Robert W Malone, MD: banned from Twitter. Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®: smeared and deplatformed. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: smeared and shadowbanned. Millions of other Americans were censored, mocked, or branded “conspiracy theorists” for questioning lockdowns, school closures, treatment protocols, natural immunity, or vaccine efficacy. The same Left and media that attacked them still runs cover for Fauci and his agency’s funding of GOF coronavirus research in Wuhan. Science advances through skepticism, open debate, and challenges to established claims. Fauci and the Left's COVID playbook relied on the opposite: captured agencies, Big Tech, and corporate media working together to crush dissent and protect the official narrative. Fauci wanted to become the world’s most famous scientist. Instead, he did more to destroy public trust in science than anyone in our lifetime.
2:18

To justify mRNA vaccine mandates, Americans were told the shots would stop infection, block transmission, and end the spread of COVID. None of that was true, and Fauci knew it. Trust collapsed not because Americans became “anti-science,” but because Fauci misled the public, moved the goalposts, and worked with Big Tech to silence dissent. In August 2022, Fauci wrote in his own diary that he pushed the CDC to avoid saying the vaccines were “not effective at all in preventing infection and transmission.” Why? Because it “would undermine the DOJ’s efforts at mandates.” He suppressed the truth to protect the mandates, not the public. Meanwhile, the people chanting “trust the science” were silencing scientists: Dr. Robert W Malone, MD: banned from Twitter. Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®: smeared and deplatformed. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: smeared and shadowbanned. Millions of other Americans were censored, mocked, or branded “conspiracy theorists” for questioning lockdowns, school closures, treatment protocols, natural immunity, or vaccine efficacy. The same Left and media that attacked them still runs cover for Fauci and his agency’s funding of GOF coronavirus research in Wuhan. Science advances through skepticism, open debate, and challenges to established claims. Fauci and the Left's COVID playbook relied on the opposite: captured agencies, Big Tech, and corporate media working together to crush dissent and protect the official narrative. Fauci wanted to become the world’s most famous scientist. Instead, he did more to destroy public trust in science than anyone in our lifetime.

KanekoaTheGreat

676,397 次观看 • 20 天前

I made Jay Bhattacharya watch extended footage of Australia's lockdowns to get his expert reaction. It says everything we need to know about his instincts as the new Director of NIH overseeing the Public Health of the USA and by extension, much of the world. Jay: 'It was a propaganda campaign to create an illusion of consensus that didn't actually exist. It was NOT following the science.' 'This is not public health. I think people are going to look back in shame.' 'This is a mass violation of civil rights in the name of Public Health. If Public Health is what we just saw, then Public Health is not worth having.' --------------- The other gentleman with me is retired Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, Professor Ramesh Thakur.
4:55

I made Jay Bhattacharya watch extended footage of Australia's lockdowns to get his expert reaction. It says everything we need to know about his instincts as the new Director of NIH overseeing the Public Health of the USA and by extension, much of the world. Jay: 'It was a propaganda campaign to create an illusion of consensus that didn't actually exist. It was NOT following the science.' 'This is not public health. I think people are going to look back in shame.' 'This is a mass violation of civil rights in the name of Public Health. If Public Health is what we just saw, then Public Health is not worth having.' --------------- The other gentleman with me is retired Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, Professor Ramesh Thakur.

discernable

43,911 次观看 • 1 年前

Journal of Health Communication editor-in-chief on the Fauci hearing... "[P]ublic service and public servants should be respected. Everyone who is in that hearing and meeting room. But what's happened is this is an assault on science and scientists. And unfortunately, Dr. Fauci is in that seat. 38 years of service to the country. One of the best -known scientists for infectious disease, unfortunately, has taken a lot of heat for probably a lot of shall we say, issues that were not fully his. He didn't make all the decisions that drove the COVID pandemic. But you are right that he is one of the most respected scientists and should be respected in that same sort of way today. We certainly didn't learn anything from the way the hearing was held."
0:46

Journal of Health Communication editor-in-chief on the Fauci hearing... "[P]ublic service and public servants should be respected. Everyone who is in that hearing and meeting room. But what's happened is this is an assault on science and scientists. And unfortunately, Dr. Fauci is in that seat. 38 years of service to the country. One of the best -known scientists for infectious disease, unfortunately, has taken a lot of heat for probably a lot of shall we say, issues that were not fully his. He didn't make all the decisions that drove the COVID pandemic. But you are right that he is one of the most respected scientists and should be respected in that same sort of way today. We certainly didn't learn anything from the way the hearing was held."

Curtis Houck

35,515 次观看 • 20 天前

BREAKING IN WASHINGTON: Dr. Fauci tells Congress he had to contradict President Trump on the podium because he felt it was his responsibility to tell the American people the truth, to tell them about what science actually said. He was responding to a leading question by Democratic Congressman Jared Moskowitz (Jared Moskowitz). WATCH Question: Dr. Fauci, you talked about how we live in partisan times. A lot of misinformation and colleagues on this body said you should be charged and found guilty. Of course, the only one that's happened to is your former boss. But the question I have is when you saw a lot of that disinformation, whether it was we can use a disinfectant to do like a cleaning or do light in the body, or that China is working super hard, President Xi's got it contained. All of this stuff that was being put out, were you concerned? What was your feeling at that time working in the administration, seeing that come from the podium? Answer: Well, I was very frustrated by that. It was very clear I was put in a very difficult position that I didn't like of having to contradict publicly the president of the United States. I took no great pleasure in that, but I felt it was my responsibility to preserve. Question: He must have thought you did a great job. He gave you a commendation right before he left. Answer: Well, I felt it was my responsibility, you know, as to preserve my own personal integrity and my major responsibility to the American public to tell them the truth. And if I could just take this opportunity. When I was saying that if you attack me, you attack science, I didn't mean that I am science. What I meant was that when the data show that hydroxychloroquine does not work and there are people saying, oh, it does, I'll give it to people, and we know it can be hurtful to them, then when you're attacking what I'm saying, that the science shows it doesn't work and the science shows that bleach doesn't work, that when you attack that you really are attacking science because science has shown that it doesn't work. That's what I meant when you attack me, you're attacking science. Response: Thank you, doctor. Thank you, mister chairman. I yield back, time's expired. Now recognize Mister Jordan from...
1:59

BREAKING IN WASHINGTON: Dr. Fauci tells Congress he had to contradict President Trump on the podium because he felt it was his responsibility to tell the American people the truth, to tell them about what science actually said. He was responding to a leading question by Democratic Congressman Jared Moskowitz (Jared Moskowitz). WATCH Question: Dr. Fauci, you talked about how we live in partisan times. A lot of misinformation and colleagues on this body said you should be charged and found guilty. Of course, the only one that's happened to is your former boss. But the question I have is when you saw a lot of that disinformation, whether it was we can use a disinfectant to do like a cleaning or do light in the body, or that China is working super hard, President Xi's got it contained. All of this stuff that was being put out, were you concerned? What was your feeling at that time working in the administration, seeing that come from the podium? Answer: Well, I was very frustrated by that. It was very clear I was put in a very difficult position that I didn't like of having to contradict publicly the president of the United States. I took no great pleasure in that, but I felt it was my responsibility to preserve. Question: He must have thought you did a great job. He gave you a commendation right before he left. Answer: Well, I felt it was my responsibility, you know, as to preserve my own personal integrity and my major responsibility to the American public to tell them the truth. And if I could just take this opportunity. When I was saying that if you attack me, you attack science, I didn't mean that I am science. What I meant was that when the data show that hydroxychloroquine does not work and there are people saying, oh, it does, I'll give it to people, and we know it can be hurtful to them, then when you're attacking what I'm saying, that the science shows it doesn't work and the science shows that bleach doesn't work, that when you attack that you really are attacking science because science has shown that it doesn't work. That's what I meant when you attack me, you're attacking science. Response: Thank you, doctor. Thank you, mister chairman. I yield back, time's expired. Now recognize Mister Jordan from...

Simon Ateba

2,818,632 次观看 • 2 年前

Ginkgo Bioworks CEO Jason Kelly explains how "cloud-style" automated science labs can create "millions of scientists" by democratizing access to experimentation: “Science is the formalization of human curiosity. The reason everyone doesn't do science today is that you're blocked by the cost and expense of all the physical infrastructure.” “If it was available cloud-style, for example, how many people would want to be doing science? Maybe they have a health condition they want to study themselves, maybe they have a new idea for a material, maybe they're a gardener and they want to make a new plant variety?” “I know that sounds crazy, but I'll tell you something else that sounded crazy. In 1960, if you said random, average people will program computers, that sounded insane.” "The model’s ability to access literature and be smart and tell you how to turn your question into an experiment—and then the autonomous labs that could do that experiment for you in the cloud—means we'll have millions of scientists, just like we have millions of programmers now as we made it easier."
1:38

Ginkgo Bioworks CEO Jason Kelly explains how "cloud-style" automated science labs can create "millions of scientists" by democratizing access to experimentation: “Science is the formalization of human curiosity. The reason everyone doesn't do science today is that you're blocked by the cost and expense of all the physical infrastructure.” “If it was available cloud-style, for example, how many people would want to be doing science? Maybe they have a health condition they want to study themselves, maybe they have a new idea for a material, maybe they're a gardener and they want to make a new plant variety?” “I know that sounds crazy, but I'll tell you something else that sounded crazy. In 1960, if you said random, average people will program computers, that sounded insane.” "The model’s ability to access literature and be smart and tell you how to turn your question into an experiment—and then the autonomous labs that could do that experiment for you in the cloud—means we'll have millions of scientists, just like we have millions of programmers now as we made it easier."

TBPN

13,054 次观看 • 6 个月前

RFK Jr.: "All of those senators are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars, including, in some cases, millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. So they don't want to hear the answers to the questions that they ask me." "They want to make a little speech and then shut me down. But they can't deny the fact that we did worse than COVID. The CDC is a broken agency." "We did worse than any country in the world. We have 4.2% of the world's population. We have 20% of the world's COVID deaths. We literally are the worst team in the league."" I've been brought in as a new manager, and my job is to shake up the organization to fire the people who were responsible for masking our children with no science, for social distancing orders with no science, or all the other thing, you know, for all of the other things that they try, for closing our schools. At the behest of the teachers union, hurting workers all over America." "These were bad. We literally did worse than any country in the world, and it was because we forgot about the science. And what we're going to do, what the Trump administration is going to do, is to return gold standard science and make this agency the lead agency for public health in the world once again."
1:59

RFK Jr.: "All of those senators are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars, including, in some cases, millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. So they don't want to hear the answers to the questions that they ask me." "They want to make a little speech and then shut me down. But they can't deny the fact that we did worse than COVID. The CDC is a broken agency." "We did worse than any country in the world. We have 4.2% of the world's population. We have 20% of the world's COVID deaths. We literally are the worst team in the league."" I've been brought in as a new manager, and my job is to shake up the organization to fire the people who were responsible for masking our children with no science, for social distancing orders with no science, or all the other thing, you know, for all of the other things that they try, for closing our schools. At the behest of the teachers union, hurting workers all over America." "These were bad. We literally did worse than any country in the world, and it was because we forgot about the science. And what we're going to do, what the Trump administration is going to do, is to return gold standard science and make this agency the lead agency for public health in the world once again."

Camus

27,280 次观看 • 11 个月前

“Every single NIH employee had to write… a loyalty oath to DEI principles.” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya reveals that the woke ideology infected science over the past 20 years. “None of it actually translated over to better health for anybody.” It’s worse than we think. “Over the last 15-20 years, the NIH incorporated into its agenda things I can only characterize as political agendas rather than scientific agendas.” “Probably the most prominent example of this is DEI.” “If you’re a researcher outside the NIH, the ticket to getting extra, relatively easy funds was to promise to do DEI research.” “Much of that research had no real scientific basis at all” and did not translate into better health outcomes for minorities or anyone else. And here’s what worse: “At the end of the year, the NIH would often have some money left over.” “The NIH program officers would go to the people who were doing these projects… and say, ‘look, we have some money left over, if you propose a diversity supplement,’—meaning essentially some DEI add-on that wasn’t actually good science—‘then you can get access to extra money for your research.’” “It was basically wasting taxpayer money that had no chance of improving the health of anybody.” “We’ve gotten rid of all that.” Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Jay Bhattacharya
3:58

“Every single NIH employee had to write… a loyalty oath to DEI principles.” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya reveals that the woke ideology infected science over the past 20 years. “None of it actually translated over to better health for anybody.” It’s worse than we think. “Over the last 15-20 years, the NIH incorporated into its agenda things I can only characterize as political agendas rather than scientific agendas.” “Probably the most prominent example of this is DEI.” “If you’re a researcher outside the NIH, the ticket to getting extra, relatively easy funds was to promise to do DEI research.” “Much of that research had no real scientific basis at all” and did not translate into better health outcomes for minorities or anyone else. And here’s what worse: “At the end of the year, the NIH would often have some money left over.” “The NIH program officers would go to the people who were doing these projects… and say, ‘look, we have some money left over, if you propose a diversity supplement,’—meaning essentially some DEI add-on that wasn’t actually good science—‘then you can get access to extra money for your research.’” “It was basically wasting taxpayer money that had no chance of improving the health of anybody.” “We’ve gotten rid of all that.” Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Jay Bhattacharya

Jan Jekielek

219,261 次观看 • 6 个月前

Kennedy’s plan landed like a thunderclap and the pushback began almost immediately. Not everyone in the room welcomed Kennedy’s vision. Rep. Diana DeGette zeroed in on concerns that NIH scientists could face retaliation for speaking out. She pressed Kennedy to commit, unequivocally, that no disciplinary action would be taken against those who signed a letter questioning his leadership. “It should be an easy answer because it's illegal,” she said. Kennedy insisted his goal was the opposite, that HHS under his direction would “commit that we are absolutely depoliticizing science at NIH for the first time.” Then he slammed the Biden-era politicization of science across all agencies. This is what he was working to rid. “The Biden administration….Ms. Chairwoman, the Biden administration politicized the science and I just gave you three of thousands of examples of how they did that.” But when asked about the letter directly, he said it was the first he’d heard of it.
0:59

Kennedy’s plan landed like a thunderclap and the pushback began almost immediately. Not everyone in the room welcomed Kennedy’s vision. Rep. Diana DeGette zeroed in on concerns that NIH scientists could face retaliation for speaking out. She pressed Kennedy to commit, unequivocally, that no disciplinary action would be taken against those who signed a letter questioning his leadership. “It should be an easy answer because it's illegal,” she said. Kennedy insisted his goal was the opposite, that HHS under his direction would “commit that we are absolutely depoliticizing science at NIH for the first time.” Then he slammed the Biden-era politicization of science across all agencies. This is what he was working to rid. “The Biden administration….Ms. Chairwoman, the Biden administration politicized the science and I just gave you three of thousands of examples of how they did that.” But when asked about the letter directly, he said it was the first he’d heard of it.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

255,599 次观看 • 1 年前

You Mark Zuckerberg and Meta interfered with research by stopping the recruitment of my protocols. This SHOULD NOT BE FORGOTTEN. Interference in research affected everyone. I was shadow-banned and censored. I was told I was spreading MISINFORMATION by your fact checkers who NEVER TOUCHED A PATIENT DURING COVID-19. STEP into my lab ProgenaBiome and see the thousands I treated and lost NO ONE. See all the 💩we analyzed. See all the hundreds of conferences I spoke at including being a keynote speaker at American College of Cardiology and a speaker at National Institute of Standards and Technology. See who is on my biome squad from all academic centers. See who co-wrote the book Let's Talk Sh!t. See who is on my papers as co-authors. See who spoke at the Malibu Microbiome meeting. See my testimony in front of Congress. Speak to my clientele in Malibu. Speak to hundreds of Pharma companies I did trials for and see the hundreds of drugs I helped bring to market including recently a celiac sprue drug. Talk to all the VCs who have consulted me at Coleman Research and got my opinion on new drugs. Did I spread misinformation or EARLY INFORMATION? Your company interfered with research and people died. It’s time for corrective actions. Interference with research affects EVERYONE and will affect you one day as well. No one escapes disease. Interference in research kills science and kills hope. This is NOT SOMETHING that will be excused by your words. Science is a story untold. Science NEEDS to be challenged and questioned. There are no right or wrong answers in science. #PROVEMEWRONG IS SCIENCE. Science guides medicine but should NEVER DICTATE MEDICINE. The practice of Medicine takes courage and is very much an art where innovations happen. To discourage that art, those innovations by a narrative pushing the price of a stock is to kill Medicine and hope. NO I DO NOT ACCEPT YOUR APOLOGY. Words are lame… ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.
0:30

You Mark Zuckerberg and Meta interfered with research by stopping the recruitment of my protocols. This SHOULD NOT BE FORGOTTEN. Interference in research affected everyone. I was shadow-banned and censored. I was told I was spreading MISINFORMATION by your fact checkers who NEVER TOUCHED A PATIENT DURING COVID-19. STEP into my lab ProgenaBiome and see the thousands I treated and lost NO ONE. See all the 💩we analyzed. See all the hundreds of conferences I spoke at including being a keynote speaker at American College of Cardiology and a speaker at National Institute of Standards and Technology. See who is on my biome squad from all academic centers. See who co-wrote the book Let's Talk Sh!t. See who is on my papers as co-authors. See who spoke at the Malibu Microbiome meeting. See my testimony in front of Congress. Speak to my clientele in Malibu. Speak to hundreds of Pharma companies I did trials for and see the hundreds of drugs I helped bring to market including recently a celiac sprue drug. Talk to all the VCs who have consulted me at Coleman Research and got my opinion on new drugs. Did I spread misinformation or EARLY INFORMATION? Your company interfered with research and people died. It’s time for corrective actions. Interference with research affects EVERYONE and will affect you one day as well. No one escapes disease. Interference in research kills science and kills hope. This is NOT SOMETHING that will be excused by your words. Science is a story untold. Science NEEDS to be challenged and questioned. There are no right or wrong answers in science. #PROVEMEWRONG IS SCIENCE. Science guides medicine but should NEVER DICTATE MEDICINE. The practice of Medicine takes courage and is very much an art where innovations happen. To discourage that art, those innovations by a narrative pushing the price of a stock is to kill Medicine and hope. NO I DO NOT ACCEPT YOUR APOLOGY. Words are lame… ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.

sabine hazan md

58,624 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 FLORIDA GOV. RON DESANTIS JUST NOW: "RFK was RIGHT to call out CNN! The legacy media really imbued [Fauci] with a certain amount of informal authority that any EDICT he would issue, that would be put out in every media channel as equating to 'science.'" "Fauci even said it one time, 'I am the science. If you disagree with me, you disagree with science!'" "Science tells you that a family is not able to operate their restaurant? Of course it doesn't! Science tells you that schools should be indefinitely closed for a virus that had very little impact on young healthy children? Of course it didn't say that!" "Science told you that mask mandates would stop COVID? Well, Fauci himself in March of 2020 said the mask wouldn't do it!" "So the diaries, I think, really validate what I saw early on. This is a guy that was drinking his own Kool-Aid!" "He was venerated by the media. I think he liked the fact that he had a lot of this informal power when he was issuing these recommendations and telling governors and mayors to do some of the draconian things that were actually done." "It had a really negative effect on a lot of societies throughout this country." "I would say we don't want a Fauci Florida, a Fauci city or a Fauci state basically was a dystopia where you had businesses reeling, people's liberties curtailed and kids left on the sideline unable to access education."
1:35

🚨 FLORIDA GOV. RON DESANTIS JUST NOW: "RFK was RIGHT to call out CNN! The legacy media really imbued [Fauci] with a certain amount of informal authority that any EDICT he would issue, that would be put out in every media channel as equating to 'science.'" "Fauci even said it one time, 'I am the science. If you disagree with me, you disagree with science!'" "Science tells you that a family is not able to operate their restaurant? Of course it doesn't! Science tells you that schools should be indefinitely closed for a virus that had very little impact on young healthy children? Of course it didn't say that!" "Science told you that mask mandates would stop COVID? Well, Fauci himself in March of 2020 said the mask wouldn't do it!" "So the diaries, I think, really validate what I saw early on. This is a guy that was drinking his own Kool-Aid!" "He was venerated by the media. I think he liked the fact that he had a lot of this informal power when he was issuing these recommendations and telling governors and mayors to do some of the draconian things that were actually done." "It had a really negative effect on a lot of societies throughout this country." "I would say we don't want a Fauci Florida, a Fauci city or a Fauci state basically was a dystopia where you had businesses reeling, people's liberties curtailed and kids left on the sideline unable to access education."

Eric Daugherty

67,262 次观看 • 15 天前

BREAKING: Rep. Eric Swalwell pleads to Pam Bondi to look into a laundry list of threats he says are spurred by the words of President Trump: "We have a bingo card at home that my kids have made of what will come next. I expected that the President would come after his enemies, but what I want to talk to you next is serious, and I did not expect this would happen, and I'd like your help on it." "The President has inspired death threats against me and many sitting up here with me." "The President can come after me. It's fine. I'm in the arena. So are these folks. But we never expected that the Department of Justice would not seek to prosecute and investigate those who are making threats against us, and that would include those on that side of the aisle, and I'm just asking for your help to protect life because life is at risk with the environment we're in right now."
4:44

BREAKING: Rep. Eric Swalwell pleads to Pam Bondi to look into a laundry list of threats he says are spurred by the words of President Trump: "We have a bingo card at home that my kids have made of what will come next. I expected that the President would come after his enemies, but what I want to talk to you next is serious, and I did not expect this would happen, and I'd like your help on it." "The President has inspired death threats against me and many sitting up here with me." "The President can come after me. It's fine. I'm in the arena. So are these folks. But we never expected that the Department of Justice would not seek to prosecute and investigate those who are making threats against us, and that would include those on that side of the aisle, and I'm just asking for your help to protect life because life is at risk with the environment we're in right now."

E X X ➠A L E R T S

85,324 次观看 • 6 个月前

.Joe Rogan and Dr Aseem Malhotra discuss prescriptions as the third leading cause of death, pharmaceutical companies' control of clinical trial data, and a study by Stanford Prof. John Ioannidis showing that financial interests compromise scientific research accuracy. "If you think of the business model of the drug industry, it is to get as many people taking as many drugs as possible for as long as possible... The third most common cause of death now globally, after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. "John Abramson explained to me how peer review is done on trials coming straight from pharmaceutical drug companies. You don't really get access to the data itself. You get access to the pharmaceutical companies' analysis of the data. That sounds insane. That sounds so obviously compromised." "He [Prof. John Ioannidis] is the most cited medical researcher in the world. He's considered a medical genius with very high scientific integrity... He wrote a paper on why most published science is false, and one of the things he writes in there with his own mathematical modeling of the reliability of research says, 'the greater the financial interest in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.'
3:26

.Joe Rogan and Dr Aseem Malhotra discuss prescriptions as the third leading cause of death, pharmaceutical companies' control of clinical trial data, and a study by Stanford Prof. John Ioannidis showing that financial interests compromise scientific research accuracy. "If you think of the business model of the drug industry, it is to get as many people taking as many drugs as possible for as long as possible... The third most common cause of death now globally, after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. "John Abramson explained to me how peer review is done on trials coming straight from pharmaceutical drug companies. You don't really get access to the data itself. You get access to the pharmaceutical companies' analysis of the data. That sounds insane. That sounds so obviously compromised." "He [Prof. John Ioannidis] is the most cited medical researcher in the world. He's considered a medical genius with very high scientific integrity... He wrote a paper on why most published science is false, and one of the things he writes in there with his own mathematical modeling of the reliability of research says, 'the greater the financial interest in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.'

KanekoaTheGreat

862,049 次观看 • 3 年前