Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Footage has emerged showing an Iranian Kheibar Shekan medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) and its transporter-erector-launcher (TEL) destroyed during combat operations in northwestern Iran. The wreckage includes part of a Kheibar Shekan reentry vehicle (RV), exposing its composite thermal protection structure and what appears to be a jamming-resistant four-element Controlled...

149,187 просмотров • 29 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 US TREMBLES: This Iranian Missile Can Wipe Out Any American Base in the Middle East Iran unveiled the Fattah missile in June 2023 as a new addition to its solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile arsenal. It has a range of approximately 1,400 km, placing Israel, US bases in the Persian Gulf, and much of the Middle East within reach from Iranian territory. 🔸 Fattah uses solid propellant, allowing it to remain fueled and launch-ready for extended periods. This eliminates the lengthy fueling process required by older liquid-fuel missiles and improves survivability by enabling mobile deployment on transporter-erector-launchers. 🔸 The missile features a maneuverable reentry vehicle mounted on a conical warhead section with small control surfaces. This allows trajectory adjustments during the terminal phase of flight. Unlike traditional ballistic warheads that follow a predictable descent path, maneuvering reentry vehicles can alter direction, reducing interception probability and shortening reaction time for missile defense systems. 🔸 Fattah uses composite materials to reduce structural weight while maintaining strength. This improves range efficiency and allows the missile to carry a warhead estimated at around 450–500 kg. 🔸 The system is part of a broader modernization effort that includes missiles such as Haj Qasem and Kheibar Shekan, all built around solid fuel, mobile launch capability, and maneuverable warheads. These systems are designed for rapid deployment, reduced launch preparation time, and greater operational flexibility. Fattah shows Iran’s continued focus on survivable medium-range strike systems capable of operating from mobile platforms and reaching targets across the region. Trump has been shipping massive amounts of military cargo to the Middle East lately ahead of a possible strike on Iran. Did he manage to send enough body bags for American cannon fodder in case of an Iranian Fatah retaliatory strike?

NewRulesGeopolitics

16,391 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇮🇷 Iran’s Ballistic Missile Arsenal and the Regional Counter Strategy Fateh Series (SRBM) The Fateh family represents Iran’s core short range ballistic missile capability. These missiles use solid fuel, allowing rapid launch with minimal preparation time. Estimated range is around 300 km, designed for battlefield and regional targets. Later variants emphasize higher accuracy through improved guidance and terminal maneuvering, making them more difficult to intercept than older systems. Sejjil (MRBM) Sejjil is a two stage, solid fuel medium range ballistic missile with an estimated range of 2,000 to 2,500 km. Its solid fuel design significantly improves survivability by reducing launch detection time. Sejjil is intended as a strategic missile capable of reaching targets across the Middle East, including major military bases and infrastructure. Kheibar Shekan (Advanced MRBM) Kheibar Shekan is a newer generation solid fuel missile with a reported range of around 1,450 km. It features a maneuverable reentry vehicle, enabling mid course and terminal phase adjustments to complicate interception. This missile is optimized to penetrate modern missile defense systems rather than relying purely on range or payload. Why these missiles challenge air and missile defenses? Solid fuel propulsion shortens warning time. Maneuverable reentry vehicles reduce interception probability. High speed terminal phases compress response windows. When launched in salvos, these missiles are designed to stress and saturate defensive systems. How regional and allied forces aim to counter this threat Surrounding states and allied bases rely on layered missile defense. Patriot PAC 3 MSE addresses short range and terminal phase threats. THAAD provides high altitude interception against medium range missiles. Israeli systems such as Arrow complement regional coverage. Early warning radars, space based sensors, and shared command networks extend detection and response time. Base hardening, dispersal of assets, and redundancy reduce damage if interception fails. Intelligence driven preemptive strike capability remains a key deterrent factor. Strategic assessment Iran’s missile program emphasizes survivability and defense penetration rather than sheer numbers. In response, regional allies focus on integration, layered defense, and intelligence dominance. The outcome in any future conflict would likely depend less on individual missiles and more on coordination, saturation levels, and decision speed.. Can layered missile defense realistically stay ahead of evolving maneuverable ballistic threats?

Defense Intelligence

22,048 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇮🇷 Iran said it launched three separate waves of attacks today and that its list of potential targets against the U.S. and Israel in the region is “10 times larger” than the targets available to its enemies. Statements from the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters and the IRGC, carried by Mehr News Agency, detail what Iran says it targeted and struck: 💢 In the 34th wave of “Operation True Promise 4,” Iran said it fired Qadr, Emad, Kheibar, and Fattah missiles at Israeli and U.S. targets. ➤ The gathering locations of American soldiers at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE and Al Jufair in Bahrain were “effectively targeted” by IRGC missile launches and attack drones. ➤ Iranian missiles “struck” Ramat David Airbase, the civilian airport in Haifa, and missile launchers near Bnei Brak east of Tel Aviv, according to the statement. 💢 Tehran said a 35th wave followed, launching Fattah, Kheibar Shekan, and Khorramshahr missiles toward Tel Aviv, Beit Shemesh, and U.S. bases. 💢 In Wave 36, the IRGC said attacks were carried out against the U.S. Fifth Fleet base in Bahrain, Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, and bases at Al-Adairi and Al-Harir in Iraq’s Kurdistan region, claiming American operational infrastructure was destroyed. 💢 The IRGC also said its air defenses intercepted and destroyed a Hermes-900 drone over Ilam province. 📹 Video released by Iranian media shows Qadr, Emad, and Kheibar Shekan missiles being launched during the 36th wave of “Operation True Promise 4.” Iran once again warned that U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iranian infrastructure and civilians “will not go unanswered.””Now, their days and nights are limited to siren sounds, fleeing, and shelters. We will not let them go,” the forces said.

Drop Site

67,203 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨TRUMP IN PANIC: Here's Iran’s DEADLIEST Missile The Fattah-2 missile introduces a totally new concept: instead of relying solely on a ballistic reentry vehicle, it uses a hypersonic glide vehicle designed to manoeuvre during the final phase of flight. This glide vehicle separates after the booster phase and continues toward its target while remaining inside the atmosphere. Unlike traditional ballistic warheads, which follow a largely predictable descent, a glide vehicle can adjust its path, making tracking and interception more difficult, especially for systems optimised to counter classic ballistic trajectories. The missile has a range of around 1,400 kilometres, placing it within the same general category as several other medium-range systems in Iran’s arsenal. The key difference lies in the vehicle’s flight behaviour rather than its distance. The ability to manoeuvre at hypersonic speed requires precise guidance, heat-resistant materials, and stable control under extreme aerodynamic stress. The development of systems like Fattah-2 reflects a long-term trend in Iran’s missile programme. Over the past two decades, Iranian engineers have steadily improved propulsion, accuracy, and survivability. Much of this work has taken place domestically, under sanctions and technological isolation, which has helped the country to develop internal research and production. If Israel and its NATO allies struggled with Iran’s previous retaliatory strike, how prepared are they for a larger one given Iran’s recent military advances?

NewRulesGeopolitics

45,982 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад