Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
For 1987 Constitutional framer Atty. Rene Sarmiento, the impeachment voting threshold should be "two-thirds of all those present" and should not include absent senator-judges. #ANCAlerts
49,430 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce •via X (Twitter)
13 Yorum

Common sense dictates that only those who are present should be allowed to vote. The same principle applies in regular elections: a person cannot vote if they are absent from their designated polling precinct. Unless the rules are amended to allow online voting in an impeachment

Yeah, in my little ugok mind, I call this COMMON SENSE! Have you ever seen an absentee judge voting in talent show? Uhmmm, weird! Constitution is a living document for the Filipino people, not a legalese nonsense or facilitator on absurdity. Many lawyers appreciate this point

Tama! Absent ka tapos boboto ka? Parang Miss U lang yarn. Dapat nandun ka to vote as judge. 🤭🤭🤭

Ito ang tama at may sense. Yung iba na dating SC ay fantasy. Kahit wla sa plenary makakaboto pa rin... Hanep!

"All those present" is different from "all members"... Isa pang #BendTheLaw...

Exactly san ka naman nakakita boboto ka ng di mo alam ano nangyayari sa hearing dahil wala ang judges? Hahaha may nagbigay ba ng verdict na wala ang judges? Common sense na lang..

But that is not what was written..depriving or sanctioning other member senators through false prosecution or persecution didn't make them as not member of the semate.Fuck yourself twisted old fart!!🤮🤮

Baluktotin niyo na ang batas. 😂😂😂 sa isang babae takot na takot na sila ginagawa na niyo n lahat pero wala parin kwenta mataas aprin survey ni Madam si ngag -27 parin hahah

Glad to meet one of the framers of the Cory constitution, the mother of all of our troubles such as the creation of useless party lists.

How much have you got from the drug addict Bangag inorder to deliberately misinterprete. Bangag won't really mind to spend a fraction of what he has looted from tax payers money. To convict is 2/3 of ALL THE MEMBERS- not to all present?The word "present" is clearly not there.

1987 Constitution was after Martial Law. Go figure it out. What will happen to the country if the sitting ruler was able to persecute those who are against him and let those who kiss his ass run the country? The opposition will have no chance. That’s the mark of a dictator.

“2/3 of all members.” ngani . Kahit simpleng tao maintindihan ang ibig sabihin nyan. Kung 24 ang all members ng senado , 16 kailangan to convict. Ginawa sanang 2/3 of all members present or who have taken oath, or dont have case or etc…. 🤔

Bugok

