正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
For decades, the Durupınar formation has been debated, dismissed and investigated. But this season, we’ve gone further than ever before. Radar scanning. Hundreds of soil samples. Core drilling deep beneath the surface. And the more data we collect, the harder it becomes to explain this site as simply a... show more
27 条评论

This is scaring non believers to death they can't fathom something greater than themselves.

We need those independent results, nothing else matters until we can verify.

This is how Christian's hurt Christianity grand claims that cant be proven and when you fail to prove it (because you will fail) then its just more proof the bible is a lie to non believers. This is what using the lords name in vain looks like in practice.

The Wyatt grift lives on. Amazing.

Shape is not proof. A landslide can also outline a hull. Being at an elevation of 515 feet on Ararat doesn’t turn stone into wood. Neither do radar “corridors”: an echo is not a cabin. They have been promising the Ark for decades. Now they are drilling and already telling the story of the discovery with a donation link right below. The borehole will yield either petrified wood or mud. Until the lab weighs in, this isn't a discovery. It's faith jumping the gun and charging admission.

The mountains were named Ararat after gensis talks of mountains called Ararat. It depends what cubit you want to select to suit your narrative. It’s literally double the width but sure ignore that part. It’s an unproven radar technique that’s been interpreted by one person.

Good morning team, I have an important question on the floor for Lauren regarding the project timeline her and spoke about last night. I asked her via a text thread whether the project is going to allow independent outside organizations like the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) to take physical samples to verify your core drilling data, or if it is strictly internal testing only? I did not understand her answer she gave me. Can Lauren or someone on the team clarify her answer on who exactly is going to be testing your core samples? Are you allowing other great organizations like the trusted Creation Research Insitute to test your samples independently? If they are or someone else is can you give us the name of the companies/companies? Or, are you only allowing only your own team to test your samples? Is so, why not allow independent testing. It is a fair question. Thank you in advance as I am asking on behalf of all who have taken a keen interest in your particular project. Lauren told me the lab data takes 2-3 months. I am dropping a video within the next 24 hours with a full update on the Durupınar dig site, and who will be doing the sampling, as a lot of people I am hearing from really want to know. Please get back to me. In Jesus name.

David Fasold did all of this in the 80’s with the most up to date equipment at the time. This is only using newest technology I would think. Bet the results will be very similar.

You should change the name of your account to Noah's Ark SCAMS!

You lot have changed your tune. For weeks, members of your "team" have been saying this has been proven to be Noah’s Ark. Why suddenly, "Could this really be Noah’s Ark?" Scan results not going your way? Ron Wyatt is spinning in his grave. 🤣

I'm not convinced until I see petrified wood dated to the correct time period

The real test is honesty when it turns out to be the bedrock syncline it is, and nothing more. You've provided no conclusive evidence so far. Enjoy your 15 minutes of fame before your lifetime of infamy.

You can't do it that way, guys. "Look! a tree..."

Uzaylı aracı (UFO) çıkar ama Nuh'un ahşap gemisi çıkmaz. Madem heveslisiniz, denememiş olmayın.

Core drilling is the right test, thats what will settle it. The 515 feet only matches if you use the long Egyptian royal cubit though. At the usual 18 inch cubit Genesis 6:15 comes to 450 feet. And Genesis 8:4 says the mountains of Ararat, a whole region, so the text doesnt need this ridge to be the place

How long will u promote your donations without showing atleast some proof? Ron Wyatt already did his part faithfully. Asking for money means yall dont depend on our Almighty God for your needs

Seems like you’d know something dispositive by now, so that what we’re seeing now is the tapering end of a scam that may have started with good intentions.

>core drilling >can't drill past rock >military grade scanner >that was never used by military, and is calibrated to show the picture they wanted to show Can we actually investigate if they were planning this fraud?

That would really be something. God bless.

Let's us know when you find wood. I find the search for petrified wood puzzling. How long does it take for wood to petrify? How does petrified wood form?

but . . . . Ha ha The forensic evidence to the cause of the great flood has been posted across multiple media platforms for the last several years and . . . . Ha ha again That obvious splashes of the mass/volume displacements are truly undeniable unless you are a mocker of God .

🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Holy Scripture describes the Ark as a rectangle. It had no sail or rudder. It was a barge. It didn't have a pointed bow or stern like you see in children's story books. A rectangle doesn't match up with the shape of this formation.

Praise the Lord for your works regarding this..

Will you be testing for animal dna?

Respect for moving from images to physical cores. That's the step this case has needed for decades. The lab is the real test now: worked timber or manufactured material in stratigraphic context would change everything. Publishing the raw GPR data alongside the results would let outside geophysicists check it too. Watching this file closely.

grifters, always the grifters
