正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

For more than five years, this Reddit thread sat without a single new comment. Then Lance Twiggs returned to it. December 13, 2024. 08:46:58 UTC. Using u/lancelott3, he commented on a post originally published June 11, 2019, explaining that he kept coming back because he referenced it so often....

51,542 次观看 • 9 天前 •via X (Twitter)

46 条评论

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void9 天前

The text accompanying the drawings in the original 4chan thread: No. 12662438: “These shapes might also help my point get across. Same order.” No. 12662476: “Also, take note of how the shapes fit together (relationships/sex). Trans female shape combined with others…” No. 12662482: “Trans male combined with others.” No. 12662486: “Cisgender heterosexual relationship.” No. 12662493: “Cis gays.” No. 12662496: “Cis lesbians.”

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void9 天前

The original drawings were uploaded individually in this 4chan thread on June 10, 2019. Archived thread, including the accompanying text and replies:

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void9 天前

Reddit post — June 11, 2019: Direct link to u/lancelott3’s comment: Profile archive captured September 13, 2025, preserving the comment:

Truttie 的头像
Truttie8 天前

I believe these kids are singled out and groomed for a future appointed task. I pray all corruption, including grooming children, is snuffed out before more kids slip through the cracks.

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void8 天前

That’s exactly the kind of possibility I keep coming back to. Someone being systematically broken down and shaped into whatever another person wants them to become. It’s a horrifying thought😔

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void9 天前

Original 4chan post — June 10, 2019 Anonymous · Post No. 12662387 “I can’t be the only one who thinks this, but something about the overall design of transgender bodies just works. It just fits. It seems so natural and architecturally consistent in an inexplicable way. Try to imagine this, an ideal man. Think about his secondary sex characteristics, like his flat, fridge torso, body and facial hair, masculine proportions, and muscles. Now, imagine that while he stands tall, his crotch area has nothing sticking out of it so obviously; imagine that he has a vagina. If you consider his secondary sex characteristics, it actually weirdly fits. The apparent flatness of between his legs, with the shape of his hips and torso also being rather flat and featureless. Now imagine the opposite. A feminine woman, who has a penis. Much like above, the penis compliments her female secondary sex characteristics. It’s harder to explain than for me to visualize it, so here is a crude illustration of what I mean. There are other shapes I could use to demonstrate this architectural logic and consistency to the pair. Why does this just work out so much?”

Wtshesaid72 的头像
Wtshesaid729 天前

He also changed his user handle to Flux. All of the symbols are also physics or circuit design symbols. I think he was overly intelligent & would see symbols & then twist them into other ideas that were on his mind. His really twisted mind.

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void9 天前

I see what you’re getting at. The sheer intensity of it all is deeply disturbing. He may well have been highly intelligent,but that doesn’t make the darker psychological side of this any less troubling. Quite the opposite.

Wtshesaid72 的头像
Wtshesaid729 天前

Idk. I’m an artist, a teacher, & a science researcher in energy physics. I can see coherence in his notes as a schematic & I understand that while it is chaotic & can seem insane, there is a method to the madness. We don’t know for sure if they were in fact his notes or another layer of framing to set him up as well. That’s always been a possibility I have considered in addition to him being MK Ultra’d. He is a very interesting part of the story & I want to know who can verify that he was in fact sleeping. I think that is bullshit.

DKay 的头像
DKay8 天前

@ChewingTheVoid Can you give an example/explanation of the coherence you see as a schematic in his notes ?

Wtshesaid72 的头像
Wtshesaid728 天前

This is just the top corner of one note. I’ve got so much info off these notes that all relate to the same message. A pulsed power bank that erupts or is remotely powered on which causes an EMP that couples with Charlie’s necklace & likely the modified chair. Look at the top corner of this note. It’s a schematic of an antenna controlled electromagnetic event (the pulsed lightning that erupts out of the loop or Charlie’s necklace, confined to a space-the zigzag line representing the confined space of the EMP energetic discharge. The letters S coming in & the letters M, Y, E, B So, you have a rooftop Antenna-SS signal which triggers the lightning up through the middle of the loop or Charlie’s necklace. (Electric field)+ (B= magnetic field) THIS IS JUST ONE NOTE. THERES A TON & ALL OF THEM ARE SCHEMATICALLY CONSISTENT WITH THIS CONCEPT & ARE MAPPED TO THE AREA. I COULD DO A WHOLE PODCAST ON JUST THESE NOTES.

N 的头像
N8 天前

You’re friggin good at this! Holy… so underrated. Top researcher 👏🏽

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void8 天前

🫶🏼

Benjamin Freeman 的头像
Benjamin Freeman8 天前

i've come to the conclusion that there is a pipeline of manipulable Patsys government agencies can utilize, like single serve utensils. The same way there is a pipeline of gifted and talented Charlie Kirk types; much more important and valuable, but ultimately just as disposable.

Slim Hippo 的头像
Slim Hippo8 天前

It's crazy investigators never found rifle casing residue. Who has ever etched brass and meticulously cleaned up the shavings? You'd think a few would have been found in the rugs or table it was done at.

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void8 天前

Let’s just say I came across a surprising number of images featuring engravings and inscriptions while digging into Lance’s online circle.

Leslie Phares 的头像
Leslie Phares9 天前

The more I see this type of stuff the more I think of the 764/09A cult.

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void9 天前

That’s very much where my mind has been going too. Deliberate psychological conditioning, rather than someone simply developing an obsession on their own. 764/O9A, though? Now that’s interesting.

Leslie Phares 的头像
Leslie Phares8 天前

Yes the deliberate psychological conditioning is what I am seeing to w all of these spaces on X and podcast.

Brian Siitupe 的头像
Brian Siitupe8 天前

This just sent me down a Reddit Hole I did not need to go down. Thanks Chewi. 🥴

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void8 天前

You’re welcome 😉

❤️Lisa 的头像
❤️Lisa9 天前

Wow 😳 very interesting I’m going to research this some more.I do see this symbols in his drawings

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void9 天前

Yeah, Lisa. There’s something about all of this that makes my mind go to the really dark stuff. Psychological conditioning, manipulation, even MKUltra-type scenarios. I know the drawings don’t prove any of that, but I have this feeling that something very dark has gone unnoticed.

❤️Lisa 的头像
❤️Lisa9 天前

I was thinking the same thing

Heather Drake 的头像
Heather Drake8 天前

The drawings always seemed like someone high on meth. I think a while back there was a friend or roommate who claimed it was something he struggled with and behavior would change. 🤷‍♀️

Chewing The Void 的头像
Chewing The Void8 天前

Yes, I remember those claims about his drug use. I’ve been thinking a lot about the connection between drugs, altered perception, and psychological conditioning. Especially how difficult it might become to separate someone’s own thoughts from outside influences…!

Wtshesaid72 的头像
Wtshesaid729 天前

@furbiddentruths

MRA 的头像
MRA8 天前

@wtshesaid72

The Meme-Industrial Complex 的头像
The Meme-Industrial Complex9 天前

@furbiddentruths So glad MKULTRA is definitely long behind us! @KlonnyPin_Gosch @AngletonOrchids @toxictiramisu

t 的头像
t8 天前

I think this kid is severely mentally abused by someone or some group. Targeted ? Sure.

DaveSun 的头像
DaveSun8 天前

The drawings are most likely fabricated to push the trans left radical narrative they are pushing to make us believe that’s the motive. These crazy drawings are often fabricated for lone wolf patsies/serial killers etc

ErynWithAWhy 的头像
ErynWithAWhy8 天前

Daayummmm 👀 🙌

PureMavs41 的头像
PureMavs418 天前

Very interesting thread. There is more to Lance's involvement in my humble opinion.

The Gifted ✨💜 的头像
The Gifted ✨💜8 天前

Runes, perhaps? 🤔

TheSnowChieftain 的头像
TheSnowChieftain8 天前

I think if you look, you will find that Tyler Robinson, Lance Twiggs, and Charlie Kirk had all been identified as having genius level IQs and were put into special classes. The original criteria was scoring at least 97% on all 5 categories of the IQ test. That is the link.

marichka 的头像
marichka8 天前

yasss Lance spill the tea we’re all ears now 🔥

Tim George 的头像
Tim George8 天前

I believe his drawings are related to some type of remote viewing exercise.

Vikky1of#1337and ³³º¹ 的头像
Vikky1of#1337and ³³º¹9 天前

I think you are right. Lance is the "missing" piece IMO

brandygram 的头像
brandygram8 天前

Great job on the video!

American Savage 的头像
American Savage8 天前

Reminds me of the new Ted K movie. Do we know if Lance was seeing a psychologist or subject to anything similar?

Lux 的头像
Lux8 天前

Where do I recognize that little dance from?

PunkKia 的头像
PunkKia9 天前

Images aside from whatever underlying meaning have for him, (they remind me of sigils) express intense feelings of frustration, anger, anxiety, brain overwhelm. Coping mechanism. Wonder what pharma drugs he was/is on?

MamaEssa 的头像
MamaEssa8 天前

This is bone chillingly and terrifying

Rosey Suspicions 的头像
Rosey Suspicions8 天前

I've been under the impression that Lance, Tyler, or both had an online connection to Kennington — or that in the least, they were all "sourced" that way.

MarbleMouth 的头像
MarbleMouth8 天前

🧐

GG 的头像
GG8 天前

I have always thought that Lance’s drawings look like drawn out directions, with random drawing, shapes etc overtop to hide the actual content of the drawing. The type of lines you’d see on blueprints but covered with scribbles, as if he obsessed over them. I’m so curious.

相关视频

🐿️ Since I’m right next to them (members) watching all the members prepare, one thing I felt while watching this promotion period is that I think the members have always been like this. I mean, when it comes to the part each person is given - the part where they’re the main focus - I think they’ve always worked incredibly hard to make that part look as attractive as possible. And what made me happy this time was that a lot of people came to realize that. That’s what made me happy, nothing else. In the end, it’s the same for the other members and for me as well, but when I looked at the process Sanie went through and the effort he put into preparing, I don’t think it was luck at all. I watched the various steps that went into creating that part, and since I was beside him through all of it, what I felt was not, “He was just lucky,” but rather, “People recognized the parts he had thought so much about (and put effort into it).” That’s why it made me happy. If, during the process of preparing, we hadn’t actually gone through all of that - if there hadn’t been that history behind it - I think I would’ve genuinely been like, “What are we supposed to do?” If I’d thought, “This isn’t what we intended… From what I see, this is completely… (??),” then I think I would’ve been worried. But there definitely was effort put into creating it. I know that the other members are constantly making those kinds of efforts too. I know it, and I’ll keep doing that as well. Of course, it’s also true that this opportunity became even more of a stimulus/inspiration for me and gave me motivation to work harder. So I hope that, because of this, the quality of ATEEZ’s future activities can become even better. That’s the kind of thought I’ve been having because of this. video cr. m0men1_s2

Irene | AhgaTiny

27,266 次观看 • 3 个月前

John Carpenter on how Howard Hawks's "Rio Bravo" (1959) inspired him to become a filmmaker: "As I got older I began to see that certain directors did certain things. One of the earliest examples of this was Roger Corman. I started going to see these exciting, fast, kind of cheesy but really fun monster movies, and there was one name that kept coming up on the screen: Roger Corman. 'It Conquered the World' (1956), 'Not of This Earth' (1957), 'Attack of the Crab Monsters' (1957), 'The Undead' (1957)... But | really understood for the first time what a director did when I saw 'Rio Bravo' in 1959. There was something about that movie that was like home and I can't really explain it. It was held over in Bowling Green for three or four weeks in a row because people kept coming to see it. I abandoned to see what was new in the other movie house in town to see this movie every weekend again and again because there was something in it that was different from the other westerns I had seen. I had certainly seen John Wayne before. He had become a part of my growing-up experience. He was the action guy, the cowboy. He was the guy in 'Flying Tigers' (1942) who was flying the airplanes. So what was so different about that movie? Then I became aware of this credit: “Howard Hawks’ Rio Bravo.” I looked at the poster and I said to myself, “Who is this guy? He didn't write the movie and he wasn't starring in it so why is his name up here? And why is he last in the credits?” All these things started to occur to me, but it was the emotional impact of the film that got me to start using my brain. Some way I figure out that this director made that movie." ("The Prince of Darkness: The Prince of Darkness", Gilles Boulenger, 2001) P.S: Remembering the great American filmmaker Howard Hawks on his 130th birthday.

DepressedBergman

55,688 次观看 • 5 个月前

Robert De Niro originally wanted to play Max Cherry in Jackie Brown, the role that eventually went to Robert Forster. However, Quentin Tarantino had written the role with Forster in mind and had already promised him the part. Tarantino explains… “I wrote Jackie Brown, and I decided at some point in writing the script that Robert Forster would be terrific as Max Cherry. So, while I’m still writing the script, I bump into Robert Forster - we go to the same coffee shop. ….so I decided I’m gonna give him the part, because I figure, look, this would be a big, big deal part. So if I don’t give him the part, then once I’m done with it and it gets out in the town, then it’s gonna be Gene Hackman and Paul Newman and people like that, and it would be pretty hard to say no to. But if I just give him the part right now, I’ve got the juice to get it through, and now I can’t take it back because I wouldn’t be a man of my word. So to lock myself into that decision, I give it to him before I finish writing it. And then now comes the time to do it. Robert De Niro reads it, and he wants to be in it, but he wants to play Max. And I go, “Well, look, you would be a fantastic Max, but I’ve already given that to Robert Forster, and I’m a man of my word. I can’t take it back.” Now, De Niro is very much a man of his word, so he understands that. He gets that. And he’s just like, “Yeah, yeah. That’s just disappointing. It’s just regretful.” I go, “What?” “Well, just because, you know, you were thinking about him, so you wrote it for him. But if we had had more dinners and hung out a little bit more, then you would have been thinking about me and you would have written it for me. And I understand what happened, but that could have been changed if we had spent more time with each other before this.” And so he kind of gives me the – “just think about it for a couple of days, all right? - and then let’s talk again. Maybe Bob (Robert Foster) could play Louis, the other guy.” So then I actually have Bob read Louis with me, and then read Max. And if that could work, maybe that could work. But no, everything that made him perfect for Max made him wrong for Louis. And so I get on the phone with De Niro — and I go, “Yeah, you know, I explored that. But no, everything about him that makes him perfect for Max makes him wrong to play this ex-convict guy.” And he goes, “Yeah, yeah, I get that. I get that, I get that, I get that. Okay, so tell me about this Louis character.” And I go, “You would consider playing Louis?” “Yeah, it’s a good character. It’s a good movie. I wanna be part of it. It’s a good character. I wanted the other character, but yeah, this is a good character. I’d be happy to play it.” I go, “Well, you didn’t let me know that before.” He goes, “Well, I didn’t wanna let you off the hook. I wanted you on the hook. But now if that ship has sailed, then let’s talk about Louis.” And then it was a done deal.”

Gangster Cinema Central

89,214 次观看 • 3 个月前

📢| Young Multi addressed the latest situation “As you know, I am a Polish creator, and some international viewers who are seeing this for the first time don’t know my full history online or the Polish context I grew up in; that’s why I wanted to clear this up. So 14 years ago, when I was 15, I used a word in a video that I shouldn’t have never used. I never tried to hide it; I never tried to cover it up. That clip was publicly available the entire time in YouTube. I had the tools to remove it from the channel that uploaded it at any point. And I chose not to because I rather own it than pretend it never happened. I’m not using my age or where I am from as an excuse; that’s only for context. But the responsibility to understand the weight of the word was mine, and I came to understand it on my own. I already talked about this when I just started streaming, to my Polish viewers, before anyone dug it up now. But the video from this is long gone, so I don’t have a recording of it. You can take my word for it or not I’m not gonna push anyone to believe me. I said openly many times that I said stupid things in the past that i wouldn’t say today, that I regret, and I am ashamed of it. Often, I was the one who brought this topic up. Nobody was trying to cancel me or pressure me into talking about it I talked about it on my own. Also, the same clip actually came up once before, around the time I was first introduced to an international audience. And I didn’t address it then not because I wanted to ignore it I just didn’t feel confident enough in explaining something that difficult in English, which I said in my stream in Polish. It's not my first language, and explaining something properly without a context is a lot harder for me than in Polish, and I was afraid that the language barrier would make me come across the wrong way. I'm sorry for what I said. Now that I'm much older, I know that word hurts people, and I'm sorry that I used it. If after this u feel that you don't want to watch me anymore, I understand, and you shouldn't feel bad about that. However, for those who do stick around, I hope my behaviour shows that I genuinely changed and that I see a lot of things differently now. And like I said on the international Discord: liking me doesn't mean u have to defend me all the time. Unlike a lot of stuff that's just Twitter drama, I don't think that this one is; that's why I wanted to address it properly. Also, the one thing I want to address is that I've seen suggestions that deleted videos to hide something: that's not true. Like in 2017-..Like, you don't know the context because you've known me for like 6 months..But in 2017, when I started my music career, I deleted all my gaming videos and not just the "bad ones". I didn't want people to subscribe for gaming content. That was just a career shift. One more thing: I also have seen some accounts saying I reposted a meme referencing this drama today. You know the meme "somehow young multi has something to do with this". That's not true. That repost was from a completely different situation. I think it was about some Twitter ship-related drama and has nothing to do with it. I didn't repost it today. It was like a month ago, I think. Some of these accounts already know it's false and still haven't taken the post down. I think that's it. Thank you for listening. I cannot change the past, and I said multiple times that I'm really sorry, and I'm ashamed of things that I did 14 years ago. The only thing that I can do is to take accountability, and I don't think it's a "Twitter drama". I think the word has a strong meaning. I think talking about it right now is not some stupid Twitter drama, you know. That was my statement, and thank you for listening. [PL]Okay, I think that's it. I said what I wanted to say. You all know very well that.. Like I say.. There were some clips where I was saying some things, and it was a long time ago, but that doesn't change the fact that it was said. But I am ashamed of the things that I said. Just because you (Polish viewers) know the context doesn't mean that international viewers know the context, and I just don't want anyone to think I have the same way of thinking as I did 14 years ago. Many things have changed, and many things have changed in my view. So yeah, that's it."

Young Multi News

1,275,058 次观看 • 1 个月前

Cameron Young is playing with a golf ball that would allegedly be compliant with the new roll back rules that will come into effect in a few years time. He was asked about it ahead of the PGA Championship and he says every player in the game is sacrificing distance for control, and he put it in play at the Wyndham last year which he won. “I think I put it in play the same reason that everybody else plays the ball that they play. I hit it during a ball test, one of the Titleist facilities probably close to two years ago and didn't know anything about it and just kind of say, hey, what's that one? Because I liked the flight. “Then as things progressed, I was able to test it last year at Wyndham, able to put that in play, and it's been there since. “Obviously there is no conforming list. I wasn't aware that it would have -- I suppose I read something that said it passed that test, but I wasn't aware of that until very recently. “So at no point was that a consideration. It was just really me trying to optimize my golf, and it's the ball that seems to work the best for me.” He then was asked whether he lost distance with it compared to other balls he’s tested: “Not particularly. I don't think any of us are out really here playing the ball that goes the farthest. I think you'd struggle to find a single person that's doing that. We're all sacrificing a certain amount of things that we feel are worth it, control with irons, control with wedges. For me, that's the biggest thing is being able to control spin, and this is the ball that does the best for me.” Finally he can as asked whether this ball goes further than the one he was using: “No, I hit very similar, yeah. It's much more -- the driver is kind of the easiest thing to deal with, I feel like. For me to get it where it needed to be, I had to just add a little bit of spin, and it kind of comes out at a perfectly playable range. “For me, the biggest thing, like I said, is the irons. This ball is easier to control with the irons. It doesn't spin as much, and it just allows me to be better with my distance control just because it's more consistent.” The golf ball rollback has been a hugely controversial subject but Cameron Young is currently using one that’s compliant and he is playing the best golf of his career. This gives the best idea yet on what impact, or lack of it, the new rules will actually have on the sport. PGA Championship

Flushing It

311,493 次观看 • 5 个月前

Blake Edwards on the conditions he laid out before accepting to direct "A Shot in the Dark" (1964): "'A Shot in the Dark' (1964) is nothing like Marcel Archard’s play, that’s for a start. I was asked to save the situation. They had quite a bit of money involved in this project. Peter Sellers was threatening to pull out because he didn’t like the screenplay. He said that the only way he would continue with the project would be if I took it over. I said that the only way I could possibly take it over, under such emergency conditions, would be that I would not be obliged to do anything like Archard’s play because a) I didn’t like it, b) I thought it was not a motion picture and c) I wasn’t ready to make a movie at that point. So they asked me what I wanted to do because the picture had to start in something like four weeks. I said that if they wanted me to save them, I’d have to take something with which I was familiar to begin with. I was familiar with the character of Clouseau. I needed a detective, somebody to solve a murder. I couldn’t throw the whole thing out. I had to use the idea that the maid was accused of killing the chaffeur and this had to be solved. So I thought that Peter Sellers was just the natural thing and that now I was going to try to be as broad with the character as I could be. “How far can I go now in terms of Inspector Clouseau?” I wrote the screenplay and was on the stage in four weeks with it. Fortunately, it turned out to be a reasonably funny movie. It proved something for me—that if a gag is well-designed you can pull it off." (Blake Edwards' interview with Jean-Francois Hauduroy, Cahiers du cinéma, 1966) P.S: On this 62 years ago, "A Shot in the Dark" (1964) premiered in New York City, USA.

DepressedBergman

20,460 次观看 • 4 个月前