Chewing The Void's banner

Chewing The Void

@ChewingTheVoid • 10,535 subscribers

Mostly chewing. Occasionally biting. Deep dives, digital trails & video receipts on the Kirk case and the circus around it.

Shorts

I owe Mitchell Manley (Artifex Memoriarum) an apology. Until recently, I had no idea I was witnessing the public career of a man of such remarkable historical significance. Charlie Kirk’s cameraman for thirteen years. His “close friend” and mentee. An extraordinary whistleblower. An acclaimed, award-winning creative talent whose work transcends the ordinary. And, according to Mitchell himself, someone whose proximity to Charlie Kirk was comparable to being in Martin Luther King’s inner circle. Naturally, one would expect Baron Coleman to reconize the magnitude of the man requesting his attention. But Baron didn’t cover Mitchell’s story. And then, rather devastatingly, he publicly asked who Mitchell was. Imagine that. What followed was something of a one-man publishing operation. 276 posts and replies about Baron in the last 25 days, by my count, featuring “grifter,” “deep-state fedslopper” and “liar.” A truly tireles commitment to the craft. Meanwhile, Mitchell’s own public debut is worth revisiting. Black Line Brief. July 18. No financial interest, he assures us. July 19. His domain is registered. Then came the website, podcasts,paid membersips, a Buy Me a Coffee page, Charlie-centered book plans and merchandise, including a $33.33 T-shirt emblazoned with “Meet the Former TPUSA Videographer Selling Nazi Meme Shirts.” And his earlier work history? Student activism, college in New York, internships, administration and later production assignments. Not exactly the thirteen-year cameraman story we’ve been sold. Mitchell has spent an astonishing amount of energy questionning Baron’s integrity while turning his own association with Charlie into the foundation of his public identity. His old interview discussed his humility. It appears to have been a very private achievement. The audacity would almost be impressive if the hypocrisy weren’t so ridiculous. (Almost forgot. Add recently publicly criticizing Candace Owens, Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸, daisy 🌼 and Billie Webb to Mitchell’s already remarkable résumé.) And yep, there you have it. Me, officially out of patience.

I owe Mitchell Manley (Artifex Memoriarum) an apology. Until recently, I had no idea I was witnessing the public career of a man of such remarkable historical significance. Charlie Kirk’s cameraman for thirteen years. His “close friend” and mentee. An extraordinary whistleblower. An acclaimed, award-winning creative talent whose work transcends the ordinary. And, according to Mitchell himself, someone whose proximity to Charlie Kirk was comparable to being in Martin Luther King’s inner circle. Naturally, one would expect Baron Coleman to reconize the magnitude of the man requesting his attention. But Baron didn’t cover Mitchell’s story. And then, rather devastatingly, he publicly asked who Mitchell was. Imagine that. What followed was something of a one-man publishing operation. 276 posts and replies about Baron in the last 25 days, by my count, featuring “grifter,” “deep-state fedslopper” and “liar.” A truly tireles commitment to the craft. Meanwhile, Mitchell’s own public debut is worth revisiting. Black Line Brief. July 18. No financial interest, he assures us. July 19. His domain is registered. Then came the website, podcasts,paid membersips, a Buy Me a Coffee page, Charlie-centered book plans and merchandise, including a $33.33 T-shirt emblazoned with “Meet the Former TPUSA Videographer Selling Nazi Meme Shirts.” And his earlier work history? Student activism, college in New York, internships, administration and later production assignments. Not exactly the thirteen-year cameraman story we’ve been sold. Mitchell has spent an astonishing amount of energy questionning Baron’s integrity while turning his own association with Charlie into the foundation of his public identity. His old interview discussed his humility. It appears to have been a very private achievement. The audacity would almost be impressive if the hypocrisy weren’t so ridiculous. (Almost forgot. Add recently publicly criticizing Candace Owens, Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸, daisy 🌼 and Billie Webb to Mitchell’s already remarkable résumé.) And yep, there you have it. Me, officially out of patience.

14,169 views

Remember when Candace Owens showed the black glove found in the SUV’s door pocket — right where Rick Cutler was seated? Now take a look at Rick’s back pocket.

Remember when Candace Owens showed the black glove found in the SUV’s door pocket — right where Rick Cutler was seated? Now take a look at Rick’s back pocket.

38,296 views

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

For anyone questioning whether the September 8 video of Charlie and his children was actually recorded that day, I found a way to independently CONFIRM OR DISPROVE its 7:17 PM timestamp — and all it takes is one piece of data. There’s a TV playing in the background. I isolated the audio and identified the exact commercial: MidFirst Bank — “Dream: Smart Saving Strategy” iSpot creative ID: f_Ht The September 8 video of Charlie and his children shows a timestamp of September 8, 2025 — 7:17 PM. COMMERCIALS HAVE AIRING RECORDS. That’s it. Find the airing record for that exact commercial on September 8, 2025, and compare it to 7:17 PM. It either aired at that time or it didn’t. If you work in media, advertising or broadcasting — or have access to iSpot, TVEyes, AdImpact, Nielsen or a similar database — you may be able to check this in minutes. MidFirst Bank → iSpot ID f_Ht → Phoenix (Prescott) DMA → September 8, 2025 → around 7:17 PM MST I just need the exact airing time, station/network and program. If you can check it, please DM me. I’m attaching both clips so you can hear the match yourself. Candace Owens Baron Coleman daisy 🌼 Stew Peters Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 Ana Escobar Project Constitution Muppet Masher

For anyone questioning whether the September 8 video of Charlie and his children was actually recorded that day, I found a way to independently CONFIRM OR DISPROVE its 7:17 PM timestamp — and all it takes is one piece of data. There’s a TV playing in the background. I isolated the audio and identified the exact commercial: MidFirst Bank — “Dream: Smart Saving Strategy” iSpot creative ID: f_Ht The September 8 video of Charlie and his children shows a timestamp of September 8, 2025 — 7:17 PM. COMMERCIALS HAVE AIRING RECORDS. That’s it. Find the airing record for that exact commercial on September 8, 2025, and compare it to 7:17 PM. It either aired at that time or it didn’t. If you work in media, advertising or broadcasting — or have access to iSpot, TVEyes, AdImpact, Nielsen or a similar database — you may be able to check this in minutes. MidFirst Bank → iSpot ID f_Ht → Phoenix (Prescott) DMA → September 8, 2025 → around 7:17 PM MST I just need the exact airing time, station/network and program. If you can check it, please DM me. I’m attaching both clips so you can hear the match yourself. Candace Owens Baron Coleman daisy 🌼 Stew Peters Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 Ana Escobar Project Constitution Muppet Masher

Chewing The Void

413,043 views • 1 month ago

Charlie is already hit. THEN the sleeve moves. That’s the whole reason I cut this from the only 4K of this angle. The Rick Cutler theories need that hand movement to be the cause. Timing kills them. Don’t take that as “drop the case.” Take it as “drop the dead lead.”

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Charlie is already hit. THEN the sleeve moves. That’s the whole reason I cut this from the only 4K of this angle. The Rick Cutler theories need that hand movement to be the cause. Timing kills them. Don’t take that as “drop the case.” Take it as “drop the dead lead.”

Chewing The Void

654,935 views • 1 month ago

Someone please tell me what I’m looking at before my brain completely breaks. I’ve had this photograph for quite a while, and trust me, I’ve tried to explain these two things in every normal way possible. I can’t. This isn’t a still from one of the videos circulating online. It’s an actual high-quality photograph — possibly the clearest image I’ve seen of Charlie’s body as he’s being carried out. His shirt is pulled unusually far up, and for once, security isn’t blocking the view! ➡️ First, the black elastic-looking band. You can see it high on the side of Charlie’s torso, just below his armpit, following the contour of his body around toward his back. My first thought was that it could be a strap from Bryan Harpole’s bag lying across Charlie. But look at the shape of it. It follows his body as it curves around toward his back. It doesn’t look like a loose strap lying across him. It looks like a band FITTED around his torso. ➡️ Then there’s the thin, clear-looking tube. It comes out from underneath his shirt just below the armpit and hangs straight down along the side of his torso. Could it simply be Charlie’s necklace? On a blurry image or video frame, that would probably be th obvious assumption. But this photograph is sharp enough to see the surface. Charlie’s necklace has distinct individual chain links. Whatever we’re seeing here doesn’t. It’s smooth, continuous and uniform. It doesn’t look like a chain. It doesn’t look like cord. It looks like clear tubing. And at the very bottom, there appears to be blood on it. This is where my logical brain and my eyes start arguing with each other. I’ve tried to explain both of these things in every normal way I can think of. But my brain keeps coming back to the same combination: a band fitted around his torso, clear tubing, and what appears to be blood. And yes — that combination keeps making my mind go to a concealed practical-effects blood rig: the kind of setup that can use body-worn straps and thin tubing hidden underneath clothing. I know how completely insane that sounds.That’s exactly why I’ve spent so much time trying to explain it as something else. So — WHAT am I missing? What are these two things? daisy 🌼 Zach Costello Candace Owens Ian Carroll Baron Coleman Stew Peters 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥

Someone please tell me what I’m looking at before my brain completely breaks. I’ve had this photograph for quite a while, and trust me, I’ve tried to explain these two things in every normal way possible. I can’t. This isn’t a still from one of the videos circulating online. It’s an actual high-quality photograph — possibly the clearest image I’ve seen of Charlie’s body as he’s being carried out. His shirt is pulled unusually far up, and for once, security isn’t blocking the view! ➡️ First, the black elastic-looking band. You can see it high on the side of Charlie’s torso, just below his armpit, following the contour of his body around toward his back. My first thought was that it could be a strap from Bryan Harpole’s bag lying across Charlie. But look at the shape of it. It follows his body as it curves around toward his back. It doesn’t look like a loose strap lying across him. It looks like a band FITTED around his torso. ➡️ Then there’s the thin, clear-looking tube. It comes out from underneath his shirt just below the armpit and hangs straight down along the side of his torso. Could it simply be Charlie’s necklace? On a blurry image or video frame, that would probably be th obvious assumption. But this photograph is sharp enough to see the surface. Charlie’s necklace has distinct individual chain links. Whatever we’re seeing here doesn’t. It’s smooth, continuous and uniform. It doesn’t look like a chain. It doesn’t look like cord. It looks like clear tubing. And at the very bottom, there appears to be blood on it. This is where my logical brain and my eyes start arguing with each other. I’ve tried to explain both of these things in every normal way I can think of. But my brain keeps coming back to the same combination: a band fitted around his torso, clear tubing, and what appears to be blood. And yes — that combination keeps making my mind go to a concealed practical-effects blood rig: the kind of setup that can use body-worn straps and thin tubing hidden underneath clothing. I know how completely insane that sounds.That’s exactly why I’ve spent so much time trying to explain it as something else. So — WHAT am I missing? What are these two things? daisy 🌼 Zach Costello Candace Owens Ian Carroll Baron Coleman Stew Peters 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥

Chewing The Void

326,326 views • 1 month ago

Most of us have seen this interview. This was Charlie’s last appearance with Megyn Kelly — August 6, 2025. Today, I happened to watch it without sound. And there he was. Not the debater. Just Charlie. I don’t know what he knew. Maybe we never will. But it breaks my heart that whatever Charlie carried in those final weeks ultimately belonged to him alone. So I took everything else away and what remains needs no explanation. Just Charlie. Rest easy 💔

Most of us have seen this interview. This was Charlie’s last appearance with Megyn Kelly — August 6, 2025. Today, I happened to watch it without sound. And there he was. Not the debater. Just Charlie. I don’t know what he knew. Maybe we never will. But it breaks my heart that whatever Charlie carried in those final weeks ultimately belonged to him alone. So I took everything else away and what remains needs no explanation. Just Charlie. Rest easy 💔

Chewing The Void

694,432 views • 2 months ago

I’ve watched Brandy Zadrozny’s “Who Killed Charlie Kirk?” so you don’t have to. Here’s the short version: if you still have questions, you are the problem. According to the film, you are a grifter, a conspiracy theorist, a cash-in artist, or someone unfortunate enough to be adjacent to a kombucha brewer, a Kremlin-loving model, or a far-right lawyer. Now, you might reasonably assume that a film called “Who Killed Charlie Kirk?” would spend a considerable amount of time examining the unresolved questions that have caused millions of people to distrust the official account. I have unfortunate news. Forty-five minutes later, we’ve learned that Candace Owens makes money doing her job, Baron Coleman gets Super Chats doing his, and Jon Bray sells kombucha. By the end, “Who Killed Charlie Kirk?” feels like a slightly misleading title. “Who Are All These Annoying People Who Keep Asking Questions?” would have been considerably more accurate. We’re still asking! (Oh, and one more thing…) Andrew Kolvet , I owe you an apology. I previously thought you were terrible at PR. Watching Brandy Zadrozny spend 45 minutes ridiculing the very people TPUSA presumably wants to convince has made me realize I dramatically underestimated you. You’re SPECTACULARLY terrible at PR.

I’ve watched Brandy Zadrozny’s “Who Killed Charlie Kirk?” so you don’t have to. Here’s the short version: if you still have questions, you are the problem. According to the film, you are a grifter, a conspiracy theorist, a cash-in artist, or someone unfortunate enough to be adjacent to a kombucha brewer, a Kremlin-loving model, or a far-right lawyer. Now, you might reasonably assume that a film called “Who Killed Charlie Kirk?” would spend a considerable amount of time examining the unresolved questions that have caused millions of people to distrust the official account. I have unfortunate news. Forty-five minutes later, we’ve learned that Candace Owens makes money doing her job, Baron Coleman gets Super Chats doing his, and Jon Bray sells kombucha. By the end, “Who Killed Charlie Kirk?” feels like a slightly misleading title. “Who Are All These Annoying People Who Keep Asking Questions?” would have been considerably more accurate. We’re still asking! (Oh, and one more thing…) Andrew Kolvet , I owe you an apology. I previously thought you were terrible at PR. Watching Brandy Zadrozny spend 45 minutes ridiculing the very people TPUSA presumably wants to convince has made me realize I dramatically underestimated you. You’re SPECTACULARLY terrible at PR.

Chewing The Void

612,687 views • 2 months ago

I’m no expert in body language, but I’m approximately 100% sure Tucker is thinking, “What the actual fuck?”

I’m no expert in body language, but I’m approximately 100% sure Tucker is thinking, “What the actual fuck?”

Chewing The Void

528,232 views • 2 months ago

For more than five years, this Reddit thread sat without a single new comment. Then Lance Twiggs returned to it. December 13, 2024. 08:46:58 UTC. Using u/lancelott3, he commented on a post originally published June 11, 2019, explaining that he kept coming back because he referenced it so often. Now consider the hundreds of drawings he made. The recurring symbols, the strange geometric forms, and the remarkable number of patterns resembling elements of that old 4chan imagery. I find the repetiton deeply disturbing. Not because I understand it, but precisely because I don’t. And I think about the darkest consequences of indoctrination. How a person’s entire perception of reality might gradually become shaped by the same ideas,repeated until there is no longer any meaningful distance between the person and the beliefs consuming their attention. Everything turning inward. Every thought feeding another. The same patterns,over and over, with no clear exit. And I have this nagging feeling that there’s something here we’ve overlooked. Something that might be far more significant than we’ve realized. I’d never looked into Lance or Tyler before last week. I started digging around to see if I could find anythin I hadn’t seen shared or discussed before. That’s how I came across this comment. And it’s the combination that troubles me. The repetition in the drawings. The similarities. His repeated return to that post. That’s the connection I wanted to bring to people’s attention. I know the video is dark, but I wanted it to reflect the darkness I feel beneath all of this. Candace Owens Ian Carroll Baron Coleman daisy 🌼 Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 Zach Costello

For more than five years, this Reddit thread sat without a single new comment. Then Lance Twiggs returned to it. December 13, 2024. 08:46:58 UTC. Using u/lancelott3, he commented on a post originally published June 11, 2019, explaining that he kept coming back because he referenced it so often. Now consider the hundreds of drawings he made. The recurring symbols, the strange geometric forms, and the remarkable number of patterns resembling elements of that old 4chan imagery. I find the repetiton deeply disturbing. Not because I understand it, but precisely because I don’t. And I think about the darkest consequences of indoctrination. How a person’s entire perception of reality might gradually become shaped by the same ideas,repeated until there is no longer any meaningful distance between the person and the beliefs consuming their attention. Everything turning inward. Every thought feeding another. The same patterns,over and over, with no clear exit. And I have this nagging feeling that there’s something here we’ve overlooked. Something that might be far more significant than we’ve realized. I’d never looked into Lance or Tyler before last week. I started digging around to see if I could find anythin I hadn’t seen shared or discussed before. That’s how I came across this comment. And it’s the combination that troubles me. The repetition in the drawings. The similarities. His repeated return to that post. That’s the connection I wanted to bring to people’s attention. I know the video is dark, but I wanted it to reflect the darkness I feel beneath all of this. Candace Owens Ian Carroll Baron Coleman daisy 🌼 Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 Zach Costello

Chewing The Void

51,542 views • 9 days ago

Hi👋🏼 Sorry, I’m going to need everyone back in the Erika Kirk double-major folder for a minute. Because this somehow seems to have been filed under “interesting” rather than LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Baron Coleman has already documnted this extensively, including ASU’s records from the time. I’d like to add two more ASU documents to the evidence — and these pretty much close the loop. So let me just reduce this to the part no amount of creative interpretation can fix: Erika says she graduated from Arizona State University in 2012 with a double major in Political Science and International Relations. Except she couldn’t have. ASU’s own records show the International Relations degree wasn’t established until 2024 — TWELVE YEARS after Erika says she graduated with it. And just to remove any remaining wiggle room, ASU announced it that year as a NEW(!) program, available starting that fall. Take that in. ASU University Senate — Motion 2024-56: ASU News — May 30, 2024: daisy 🌼

Hi👋🏼 Sorry, I’m going to need everyone back in the Erika Kirk double-major folder for a minute. Because this somehow seems to have been filed under “interesting” rather than LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Baron Coleman has already documnted this extensively, including ASU’s records from the time. I’d like to add two more ASU documents to the evidence — and these pretty much close the loop. So let me just reduce this to the part no amount of creative interpretation can fix: Erika says she graduated from Arizona State University in 2012 with a double major in Political Science and International Relations. Except she couldn’t have. ASU’s own records show the International Relations degree wasn’t established until 2024 — TWELVE YEARS after Erika says she graduated with it. And just to remove any remaining wiggle room, ASU announced it that year as a NEW(!) program, available starting that fall. Take that in. ASU University Senate — Motion 2024-56: ASU News — May 30, 2024: daisy 🌼

Chewing The Void

109,497 views • 21 days ago

50 seconds of Terryl Farnsworth. You’d think it would be physically impossible to fit this much sus into under a minute. And yet. 😂

50 seconds of Terryl Farnsworth. You’d think it would be physically impossible to fit this much sus into under a minute. And yet. 😂

Chewing The Void

322,963 views • 2 months ago

He doesn’t stop for Charlie. He stops at the audio table. That’s the part that looks insane. Blake “Gibby” Haruff comes over the table while Charlie is already down. He doesn’t bend down. He doesn’t help. Then he slows, looks right, and reaches with his right hand. Harpole said he was fixing a radio that came loose. The left hand at his belt looks like that. I can’t tell if the right hand grabs anything. Curious what you see on that one.

He doesn’t stop for Charlie. He stops at the audio table. That’s the part that looks insane. Blake “Gibby” Haruff comes over the table while Charlie is already down. He doesn’t bend down. He doesn’t help. Then he slows, looks right, and reaches with his right hand. Harpole said he was fixing a radio that came loose. The left hand at his belt looks like that. I can’t tell if the right hand grabs anything. Curious what you see on that one.

Chewing The Void

213,472 views • 1 month ago

I owe Mitchell Manley (Artifex Memoriarum) an apology. Until recently, I had no idea I was witnessing the public career of a man of such remarkable historical significance. Charlie Kirk’s cameraman for thirteen years. His “close friend” and mentee. An extraordinary whistleblower. An acclaimed, award-winning creative talent whose work transcends the ordinary. And, according to Mitchell himself, someone whose proximity to Charlie Kirk was comparable to being in Martin Luther King’s inner circle. Naturally, one would expect Baron Coleman to reconize the magnitude of the man requesting his attention. But Baron didn’t cover Mitchell’s story. And then, rather devastatingly, he publicly asked who Mitchell was. Imagine that. What followed was something of a one-man publishing operation. 276 posts and replies about Baron in the last 25 days, by my count, featuring “grifter,” “deep-state fedslopper” and “liar.” A truly tireles commitment to the craft. Meanwhile, Mitchell’s own public debut is worth revisiting. Black Line Brief. July 18. No financial interest, he assures us. July 19. His domain is registered. Then came the website, podcasts,paid membersips, a Buy Me a Coffee page, Charlie-centered book plans and merchandise, including a $33.33 T-shirt emblazoned with “Meet the Former TPUSA Videographer Selling Nazi Meme Shirts.” And his earlier work history? Student activism, college in New York, internships, administration and later production assignments. Not exactly the thirteen-year cameraman story we’ve been sold. Mitchell has spent an astonishing amount of energy questionning Baron’s integrity while turning his own association with Charlie into the foundation of his public identity. His old interview discussed his humility. It appears to have been a very private achievement. The audacity would almost be impressive if the hypocrisy weren’t so ridiculous. (Almost forgot. Add recently publicly criticizing Candace Owens, Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸, daisy 🌼 and Billie Webb to Mitchell’s already remarkable résumé.) And yep, there you have it. Me, officially out of patience.

I owe Mitchell Manley (Artifex Memoriarum) an apology. Until recently, I had no idea I was witnessing the public career of a man of such remarkable historical significance. Charlie Kirk’s cameraman for thirteen years. His “close friend” and mentee. An extraordinary whistleblower. An acclaimed, award-winning creative talent whose work transcends the ordinary. And, according to Mitchell himself, someone whose proximity to Charlie Kirk was comparable to being in Martin Luther King’s inner circle. Naturally, one would expect Baron Coleman to reconize the magnitude of the man requesting his attention. But Baron didn’t cover Mitchell’s story. And then, rather devastatingly, he publicly asked who Mitchell was. Imagine that. What followed was something of a one-man publishing operation. 276 posts and replies about Baron in the last 25 days, by my count, featuring “grifter,” “deep-state fedslopper” and “liar.” A truly tireles commitment to the craft. Meanwhile, Mitchell’s own public debut is worth revisiting. Black Line Brief. July 18. No financial interest, he assures us. July 19. His domain is registered. Then came the website, podcasts,paid membersips, a Buy Me a Coffee page, Charlie-centered book plans and merchandise, including a $33.33 T-shirt emblazoned with “Meet the Former TPUSA Videographer Selling Nazi Meme Shirts.” And his earlier work history? Student activism, college in New York, internships, administration and later production assignments. Not exactly the thirteen-year cameraman story we’ve been sold. Mitchell has spent an astonishing amount of energy questionning Baron’s integrity while turning his own association with Charlie into the foundation of his public identity. His old interview discussed his humility. It appears to have been a very private achievement. The audacity would almost be impressive if the hypocrisy weren’t so ridiculous. (Almost forgot. Add recently publicly criticizing Candace Owens, Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸, daisy 🌼 and Billie Webb to Mitchell’s already remarkable résumé.) And yep, there you have it. Me, officially out of patience.

Chewing The Void

14,169 views • 3 days ago

I noticed this a while back. Of all the verses Charlie could have accidentally pointed to… this one still haunts me..

I noticed this a while back. Of all the verses Charlie could have accidentally pointed to… this one still haunts me..

Chewing The Void

215,101 views • 2 months ago

THIS IS NATE WALKER. Charlie Kirk’s personal assistant — roughly 105 seconds after Charlie was killed in front of him. He’s casually walking across campus, slipping on his sunglasses with an almost surreal level of everyday normalcy. I’m sure someone will tell us there’s a perfectly innocent explanation. I’d just like to know what that explanation actually is. I’ve watched this footage an absurd number of times since Candace Owens presented it, and every replay makes the behavior I’m seeing harder — not easier — to explain. (I enhanced the footage and slowed it down so you can take a closer look for yourself) #NateWalker Sword Truth Honest Ash Project Constitution Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 Ian Carroll

THIS IS NATE WALKER. Charlie Kirk’s personal assistant — roughly 105 seconds after Charlie was killed in front of him. He’s casually walking across campus, slipping on his sunglasses with an almost surreal level of everyday normalcy. I’m sure someone will tell us there’s a perfectly innocent explanation. I’d just like to know what that explanation actually is. I’ve watched this footage an absurd number of times since Candace Owens presented it, and every replay makes the behavior I’m seeing harder — not easier — to explain. (I enhanced the footage and slowed it down so you can take a closer look for yourself) #NateWalker Sword Truth Honest Ash Project Constitution Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 Ian Carroll

Chewing The Void

229,050 views • 2 months ago

I absolutely love everything about this video😂 The A-team sitting there buried under approximately 47 Hawaiian leis, completely unfazed, somehow looking like an old married couple and siblings at the same time. The interruptions. Finishing each other’s sentences. One barely gets a thought started before the other already knows exactly where it’s going. And they’re both completely in their element here. It’s just so obviously them. No performance. No effort. Just Charlie and Candace being Charlie and Candace. They really did speak the same language. Brilliant. Ridiculous. Completely in sync. ❤️ Candace Owens #CharlieKirk #CandaceOwens

I absolutely love everything about this video😂 The A-team sitting there buried under approximately 47 Hawaiian leis, completely unfazed, somehow looking like an old married couple and siblings at the same time. The interruptions. Finishing each other’s sentences. One barely gets a thought started before the other already knows exactly where it’s going. And they’re both completely in their element here. It’s just so obviously them. No performance. No effort. Just Charlie and Candace being Charlie and Candace. They really did speak the same language. Brilliant. Ridiculous. Completely in sync. ❤️ Candace Owens #CharlieKirk #CandaceOwens

Chewing The Void

83,078 views • 1 month ago

I’ve had this footage for quite some time, and I’ve gone back and forth on whether I should share it at all. We’ve all seen the footage of Charlie being carried away. But most of this version comes from a 4K source, and the clarity reveals details that simply aren’t visible in most of the versions that have circulated. That also makes it incredibly brutal to watch. I’ve decided to share it for one reason: the fewer false trails we spend our time investigating, the better. There are theories that Charlie didn’t die that day. I wanted there to be something in this footage that left room for that hope. There isn’t. To me, this shows a man who died there, at the scene. I don’t believe he suffered. And when they carry him away, I believe they are carrying a man who is already gone. I’ve also seen it repeated countless times that there was almost no blood. There was. I wish this video supported a different conclusion. It doesn’t.💔

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

I’ve had this footage for quite some time, and I’ve gone back and forth on whether I should share it at all. We’ve all seen the footage of Charlie being carried away. But most of this version comes from a 4K source, and the clarity reveals details that simply aren’t visible in most of the versions that have circulated. That also makes it incredibly brutal to watch. I’ve decided to share it for one reason: the fewer false trails we spend our time investigating, the better. There are theories that Charlie didn’t die that day. I wanted there to be something in this footage that left room for that hope. There isn’t. To me, this shows a man who died there, at the scene. I don’t believe he suffered. And when they carry him away, I believe they are carrying a man who is already gone. I’ve also seen it repeated countless times that there was almost no blood. There was. I wish this video supported a different conclusion. It doesn’t.💔

Chewing The Void

103,761 views • 1 month ago

Here’s a rabbit hole for you. Erika Frantzve interviewing Jessica Alba for SheKnows in 2014. 31 “rights” in roughly two minutes. Whatever SheKnows saw in this performance, I’d genuinely like to see the résumé that accompanied it. So I started looking into how she got the job. Turns out, finding Erika saying “right” 31 times is considerably easier than finding the basic professional trail thatput her in that chair. And I’ve looked. Thoroughly. Far more thoroughly than should be necessary to find information this basic. I mean basic stuff: • No hiring announcement • No SheKnows host profile • No author/byline profile • No clear start date • No clear end date • No clear job title • No job description • No clear employee/freelancer/contract status • No named talent agency • No named agent • No manager • No résumé from that period • No hosting portfolio • No pre-SheKnows demo reel • No documented audition • No casting notice • No application trail • No documented referral • No editor or supervising producer attached to her role • No name of the person who hired her • No name of the person who selected her for Girl Crush • No clear timeline of her pre-SheKnows hosting work • No identifiable first professional hosting job • No identifiable first celebrity interview • No complete list of her SheKnows work • No complete list ofher Girl Crush interviews • No SheKnows page introducing her as a Girl Crush host • No production credits explaining who selected her for the Jessica Alba interview • No contemporary interview explaining how she landed the job • No contemporary interview naming who gave her th opportunity • No clear professional trail from pageants and modeling to interviewing major celebrities for SheKnows That’s a remarkable amount of missing boring information for what should be a fairly straightforward career path. So, one more for the rabbit hole collection: How did Erika Frantzve get this job?

Chewing The Void

74,688 views • 1 month ago

I was going through footage of Charlie arriving at UVU when Hunter Kozak immediately caught my attention. I’m not going to tell you what to see. I’m not going to tell you what meaning to assign to it. I’ll just note that there’s nothing unusual about a crowd reacting together. What stands out is the one person who doesn’t. Watch Hunter.

I was going through footage of Charlie arriving at UVU when Hunter Kozak immediately caught my attention. I’m not going to tell you what to see. I’m not going to tell you what meaning to assign to it. I’ll just note that there’s nothing unusual about a crowd reacting together. What stands out is the one person who doesn’t. Watch Hunter.

Chewing The Void

123,167 views • 2 months ago

I’m not sure what particular form of memory loss Dan Flood is dealing with here, but apparently the current time has an average shelf life of 36 seconds.

I’m not sure what particular form of memory loss Dan Flood is dealing with here, but apparently the current time has an average shelf life of 36 seconds.

Chewing The Void

43,768 views • 1 month ago

Baron Coleman Your opening yesterday deserves to be heard far beyond your audience. It had the rarest kind of precision - the sort that doesn’t try to impress, yet leaves almost nowhere to hide. I sat with a weight in my chest long after it ended. Rewatched it more times than I’m comfortable admitting. I cut this short video so that precision can travel further. I also encourage everyone to watch the full opening on your YouTube channel. Maybe this message finds someone else at exactly the right time.

Baron Coleman Your opening yesterday deserves to be heard far beyond your audience. It had the rarest kind of precision - the sort that doesn’t try to impress, yet leaves almost nowhere to hide. I sat with a weight in my chest long after it ended. Rewatched it more times than I’m comfortable admitting. I cut this short video so that precision can travel further. I also encourage everyone to watch the full opening on your YouTube channel. Maybe this message finds someone else at exactly the right time.

Chewing The Void

112,491 views • 3 months ago

One of the questions around Blake Harruff has been: did he take something? Candace has wondered about the car keys. I’d like to add one very simple observation to that. This is Blake shortly afterwards, running toward Charlie’s SUV with something in his hands, right in front of his stomach. Don’t remember ever seeing this pointed out before.

One of the questions around Blake Harruff has been: did he take something? Candace has wondered about the car keys. I’d like to add one very simple observation to that. This is Blake shortly afterwards, running toward Charlie’s SUV with something in his hands, right in front of his stomach. Don’t remember ever seeing this pointed out before.

Chewing The Void

31,392 views • 24 days ago