Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

For someone that prides himself on CONSISTENCY above all else, James White has some major issues maintaining it within his own webcast. As AD points out, James White is allowed to have discussions with a Muslim (Yasir Qadhi), but Joel Webbon isn’t allowed to have discussions with a Catholic...

DefiantBaptist's profile picture

Defiant Baptist

16,492 subscribers

36,112 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Someone in James White’s chat evidently saw my tweets and asked James to explain the difference between him sitting down with Yasir Qadhi and Joel Webbon sitting down with Nicholas J. Fuentes. The word salad that ensued was pretty epic: 1) James can’t address the entire interaction since it’s a ten part series. (He’s already addressed it multiple times, even before part 1 was released!) 2) James says that Nick Fuentes has said stupid and idiotic things about the Bible and Christianity. (I don’t know what he’s talking about regarding Nick’s statements, but Muslims haven’t?) 3) James says that this discussion is behind a paywall, unlike his discussion with Yasir Qadhi. (All of it will be released publicly over 10 weeks, so this isn’t a real objection.) 4) James says that it’s a stupid question to ask in the first place, just go watch the videos with Qadhi. (READ MY BOOK!) 5) James says that the differences between him and Qadhi were clearly pointed out in their discussions. (Just as Webbon and Fuentes did in their’s.) 6) James says that Yasir Qadhi said nice things about him in a mosque and asked him great questions. (Many great questions between Webbon and Fuentes too!) Just my opinion, but James White really struggled here, just as much as he struggled to find Joel Webbon’s book on Amazon. You can purchase it at the link below! Link:
4:52

Someone in James White’s chat evidently saw my tweets and asked James to explain the difference between him sitting down with Yasir Qadhi and Joel Webbon sitting down with Nicholas J. Fuentes. The word salad that ensued was pretty epic: 1) James can’t address the entire interaction since it’s a ten part series. (He’s already addressed it multiple times, even before part 1 was released!) 2) James says that Nick Fuentes has said stupid and idiotic things about the Bible and Christianity. (I don’t know what he’s talking about regarding Nick’s statements, but Muslims haven’t?) 3) James says that this discussion is behind a paywall, unlike his discussion with Yasir Qadhi. (All of it will be released publicly over 10 weeks, so this isn’t a real objection.) 4) James says that it’s a stupid question to ask in the first place, just go watch the videos with Qadhi. (READ MY BOOK!) 5) James says that the differences between him and Qadhi were clearly pointed out in their discussions. (Just as Webbon and Fuentes did in their’s.) 6) James says that Yasir Qadhi said nice things about him in a mosque and asked him great questions. (Many great questions between Webbon and Fuentes too!) Just my opinion, but James White really struggled here, just as much as he struggled to find Joel Webbon’s book on Amazon. You can purchase it at the link below! Link:

Defiant Baptist

10,446 views • 9 months ago

James White got very defensive when we brought up the double standard he has about who is allowed to talk to whom, specifically with respect to Yasir Qadhi (good!) and Nick Fuentes (bad!). Regarding his past interfaith dialogues with Qadhi, White described the interactions solely as evangelistic pursuits: "My gospel presentation was central and clear. My purposes and intentions just as clear." So little autistic me decided to go back to 2017 to see for myself. White and Qadhi organized a two day event (first night at a church, second night at a mosque), and here are my takeaways regarding the purpose for this monstrosity: 1) James White wanted Christians and Muslims to get along better without fear of each other, to be able to ☪☮𝔼✡⚧☯✝ if you will. (Spoiler alert: we can't. Not sure how many more centuries of evidence we need.) 2) James White wanted his ego stroked by a Sunni Muslim scholar. Could I be wrong about that? I guess so, but just watch the clips for yourself. Watch the full dialogues for yourself. They're easy to find. Personally, I think James White got played by a dangerous Muslim cleric and is about to do so again. And by the way, Yasir Qadhi is a key figure behind EPIC City, a proposed large-scale, faith-based residential development near Dallas, intended to be a self-sufficient "Muslim neighborhood" with homes, schools, and commercial spaces. So Qadhi doesn't really believe in coexistence either! In conclusion, James White needs to just shut up about Nick Fuentes. There's no moral high ground here. There's no "it's different when I do it" here. This is just an L for James, along with a legion of others.
4:04

James White got very defensive when we brought up the double standard he has about who is allowed to talk to whom, specifically with respect to Yasir Qadhi (good!) and Nick Fuentes (bad!). Regarding his past interfaith dialogues with Qadhi, White described the interactions solely as evangelistic pursuits: "My gospel presentation was central and clear. My purposes and intentions just as clear." So little autistic me decided to go back to 2017 to see for myself. White and Qadhi organized a two day event (first night at a church, second night at a mosque), and here are my takeaways regarding the purpose for this monstrosity: 1) James White wanted Christians and Muslims to get along better without fear of each other, to be able to ☪☮𝔼✡⚧☯✝ if you will. (Spoiler alert: we can't. Not sure how many more centuries of evidence we need.) 2) James White wanted his ego stroked by a Sunni Muslim scholar. Could I be wrong about that? I guess so, but just watch the clips for yourself. Watch the full dialogues for yourself. They're easy to find. Personally, I think James White got played by a dangerous Muslim cleric and is about to do so again. And by the way, Yasir Qadhi is a key figure behind EPIC City, a proposed large-scale, faith-based residential development near Dallas, intended to be a self-sufficient "Muslim neighborhood" with homes, schools, and commercial spaces. So Qadhi doesn't really believe in coexistence either! In conclusion, James White needs to just shut up about Nick Fuentes. There's no moral high ground here. There's no "it's different when I do it" here. This is just an L for James, along with a legion of others.

Defiant Baptist

15,603 views • 9 months ago

The problem with talking as much as Joel Webbon does is that he often ends up telling on himself. Joel is the one borrowing from Nick Fuentes "late" Joel is no prophet, nor the son of a prophet But Joel does love a PROFIT He got on the train when there was MONEY to be made
2:20

The problem with talking as much as Joel Webbon does is that he often ends up telling on himself. Joel is the one borrowing from Nick Fuentes "late" Joel is no prophet, nor the son of a prophet But Joel does love a PROFIT He got on the train when there was MONEY to be made

Hilaire Nereus

11,170 views • 9 months ago

James White decided to perform a Twitter traffic stop on Joel Webbon because he did not appreciate the way that Joel rebuked Abby “accuser of the brethren on Christmas” Libby. Multiple times, James laid out exactly how Joel should have responded to this woman, as if she was acting in good faith. Webbon referenced Abby’s prior support for genocide in Gaza, even down to “innocent Palestinian babies.” James mocked this claim, but I included the exact tweet of her’s in the video, whoops! It’s quite clear that this woman is a deranged supporter of Israel; that support is causing her to burn with hatred for actual Christians. The bottom line here is that not everyone is deserving of a good faith response, especially when that person is a scoffer like Abby. It’s ironic that a respecter of persons like James White can’t see that, but it’s not altogether surprising.
4:57

James White decided to perform a Twitter traffic stop on Joel Webbon because he did not appreciate the way that Joel rebuked Abby “accuser of the brethren on Christmas” Libby. Multiple times, James laid out exactly how Joel should have responded to this woman, as if she was acting in good faith. Webbon referenced Abby’s prior support for genocide in Gaza, even down to “innocent Palestinian babies.” James mocked this claim, but I included the exact tweet of her’s in the video, whoops! It’s quite clear that this woman is a deranged supporter of Israel; that support is causing her to burn with hatred for actual Christians. The bottom line here is that not everyone is deserving of a good faith response, especially when that person is a scoffer like Abby. It’s ironic that a respecter of persons like James White can’t see that, but it’s not altogether surprising.

Defiant Baptist

26,075 views • 9 months ago

I’m not even a fan of Ben Shapiro but I think his analysis of why Tucker brought Nick Fuentes on his show to launder him is spot on Tucker did it to save his own reputation with his own audience he shares with Nick Fuentes after Nick called him out as an alleged Fed & an elitist who pretends to be for disaffected white males
1:11

I’m not even a fan of Ben Shapiro but I think his analysis of why Tucker brought Nick Fuentes on his show to launder him is spot on Tucker did it to save his own reputation with his own audience he shares with Nick Fuentes after Nick called him out as an alleged Fed & an elitist who pretends to be for disaffected white males

Melissa Tate

333,987 views • 11 months ago

James White continues to crash out over subscription-based businesses for some reason. To be clear, no one cares that he (AOMIN) solicits donations for his ministry. The problem is that he condemns others (Joel Webbon) for doing the same. There are other problems here, though. James White starts out by insulting Joel Webbon’s lack of intelligence and scholarship, specifically as it relates to his recent interaction with Doug Wilson. Really dumb tactic. Doug Wilson has an MA in philosophy. He has never gone to seminary. Where is his theological scholarship? Furthermore, “Doctor” James White got his Th.D. and D.Min. from a non-accredited school: Columbia Evangelical Seminary. This has been pointed out many times, and James is extremely insecure and sensitive about his academic bonafides. But even crazier than that, White is a Ph.D. candidate in Textual Criticism at Northwestern University (South Africa). He had planned to do this doctoral work on P45, but this got derailed due to the Covid pandemic. However, James actually solicited and received donations for this planned course work as well as the necessary materials!!! It’s pretty clear now that this is never going to happen. Instead of petty insults and academic elitism, why not simply respond to what your opponent has said? Or failing that, why not just keep scrolling? Doug Wilson essentially took the view that interracial marriage doesn’t exist because race is impossible to define. That’s not an argument, and neither is James’ hypocrisy regarding donations.
3:54

James White continues to crash out over subscription-based businesses for some reason. To be clear, no one cares that he (AOMIN) solicits donations for his ministry. The problem is that he condemns others (Joel Webbon) for doing the same. There are other problems here, though. James White starts out by insulting Joel Webbon’s lack of intelligence and scholarship, specifically as it relates to his recent interaction with Doug Wilson. Really dumb tactic. Doug Wilson has an MA in philosophy. He has never gone to seminary. Where is his theological scholarship? Furthermore, “Doctor” James White got his Th.D. and D.Min. from a non-accredited school: Columbia Evangelical Seminary. This has been pointed out many times, and James is extremely insecure and sensitive about his academic bonafides. But even crazier than that, White is a Ph.D. candidate in Textual Criticism at Northwestern University (South Africa). He had planned to do this doctoral work on P45, but this got derailed due to the Covid pandemic. However, James actually solicited and received donations for this planned course work as well as the necessary materials!!! It’s pretty clear now that this is never going to happen. Instead of petty insults and academic elitism, why not simply respond to what your opponent has said? Or failing that, why not just keep scrolling? Doug Wilson essentially took the view that interracial marriage doesn’t exist because race is impossible to define. That’s not an argument, and neither is James’ hypocrisy regarding donations.

Defiant Baptist

20,345 views • 7 months ago

In part two of his crashout on Dale Partridge and Joel Webbon, James White made an interesting series of points: 1) Feminism has always been bad. It has never been biblical. 2) What the NXR guys attack as feminism isn’t ACKSHULLY feminism. 3) Since the NXR guys have no expertise in anythjng, listen to the Sheologians podcast, hosted by White’s divorced-and-remarried-totally-not-feminist daughter Summer. Is it just me, or does James White believe that we ought to be charitable to feminism? He seems to have to lowkey defend everything that NXR opposes.
1:58

In part two of his crashout on Dale Partridge and Joel Webbon, James White made an interesting series of points: 1) Feminism has always been bad. It has never been biblical. 2) What the NXR guys attack as feminism isn’t ACKSHULLY feminism. 3) Since the NXR guys have no expertise in anythjng, listen to the Sheologians podcast, hosted by White’s divorced-and-remarried-totally-not-feminist daughter Summer. Is it just me, or does James White believe that we ought to be charitable to feminism? He seems to have to lowkey defend everything that NXR opposes.

Defiant Baptist

18,959 views • 4 months ago

While discussing the invasion of the west by the third world, James White addressed overtures from Christians telling him we need to fight back. James agrees, but only with the tools that have been given to us in Scripture. (He’s referring to gospel preaching and probably apologetics.) We are not, according to White, permitted to use worldly tools to accomplish heavenly goals. That is literally insane, especially from someone who claims to be an expert on Gnosticism. This is just off the top of my head: 1) In Acts, the APOSTLE PAUL leveraged his status as a Roman citizen in order to secure his release from wrongful imprisonment and torture. Later, his citizenship gained him an audience with high level Roman officials, which would not have been possible otherwise. 2) James White and the elders of Apologia Church are constantly lobbying for abolition bills to end abortion. There is nothing in the Bible that commands such a thing, directly or indirectly. It is very clearly a worldly tool to accomplish a heavenly goal. And while we’re on the topic of politics, Christians should probably stop voting too. Finally, James White attempts to create some drama between NJF and NXR, because Fuentes was mocking people that say, “Hitler was great. Hitler was a Christian.” As if that’s something coming out of NXR?! Why doesn’t James just watch the interview between Fuentes and Webbon? But then, where’s the fun in not gossiping?
2:44

While discussing the invasion of the west by the third world, James White addressed overtures from Christians telling him we need to fight back. James agrees, but only with the tools that have been given to us in Scripture. (He’s referring to gospel preaching and probably apologetics.) We are not, according to White, permitted to use worldly tools to accomplish heavenly goals. That is literally insane, especially from someone who claims to be an expert on Gnosticism. This is just off the top of my head: 1) In Acts, the APOSTLE PAUL leveraged his status as a Roman citizen in order to secure his release from wrongful imprisonment and torture. Later, his citizenship gained him an audience with high level Roman officials, which would not have been possible otherwise. 2) James White and the elders of Apologia Church are constantly lobbying for abolition bills to end abortion. There is nothing in the Bible that commands such a thing, directly or indirectly. It is very clearly a worldly tool to accomplish a heavenly goal. And while we’re on the topic of politics, Christians should probably stop voting too. Finally, James White attempts to create some drama between NJF and NXR, because Fuentes was mocking people that say, “Hitler was great. Hitler was a Christian.” As if that’s something coming out of NXR?! Why doesn’t James just watch the interview between Fuentes and Webbon? But then, where’s the fun in not gossiping?

Defiant Baptist

37,086 views • 2 months ago

On a recent Dividing Line (2/27/2025), James White (𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡) recommended Gavin Ortlund as a great resource for Protestant apologetic material, despite the fact that Gavin is a theological liberal who doesn’t like James at all. White even says that you have to “eat the meat, spit out the bones” with someone like Ortlund, which is totally unbiblical. Scripture tells us to mark and avoid false teachers (Romans 16:17-18), which Gavin Ortlund clearly is. Finally, White’s endorsement of Ortlund stands in stark contrast to his vile treatment of reformed brothers with whom he has disagreements over practical theology, political theory, and/or historical perspectives. I’m thinking of Stephen Wolfe, Joel Webbon, the Ogden guys, and Ray Fava (Evangelical Dark Web). Link:
5:04

On a recent Dividing Line (2/27/2025), James White (𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡) recommended Gavin Ortlund as a great resource for Protestant apologetic material, despite the fact that Gavin is a theological liberal who doesn’t like James at all. White even says that you have to “eat the meat, spit out the bones” with someone like Ortlund, which is totally unbiblical. Scripture tells us to mark and avoid false teachers (Romans 16:17-18), which Gavin Ortlund clearly is. Finally, White’s endorsement of Ortlund stands in stark contrast to his vile treatment of reformed brothers with whom he has disagreements over practical theology, political theory, and/or historical perspectives. I’m thinking of Stephen Wolfe, Joel Webbon, the Ogden guys, and Ray Fava (Evangelical Dark Web). Link:

Defiant Baptist

58,717 views • 1 year ago

“I liked a tweet by JD Hall this morning.” Really interesting clip from James White yesterday, wherein he admits (confesses?) to liking a tweet by JD™. This can actually tell you a lot about James and how his mind works. The tweet in question was JD Hall dunking on Jenna Ellis on the topic of Calvinism, about which she is hopelessly ignorant. Hall put Ellis in her place as only Polemics Santa can do, and White ate it all up. The thing is, James White has often complained about JD’s tactics, but what this little episode shows is that White never actually had an issue with him there. Rather, it was the fact that JD decided to use those same tactics against James. That’s when everything went sideways. It had nothing to do with Hall’s struggles from a few years back. So there’s the moral of the story. James is happy to associate with literally anyone, just as long as they attack the correct targets and focus on the correct issues. Anything that James deems to be friendly fire will get you voted off the island before you can say “sacralism.” And yes, I do have a PhD in James White Studies. Unfortunately, it’s not from an accredited school. 😢
3:45

“I liked a tweet by JD Hall this morning.” Really interesting clip from James White yesterday, wherein he admits (confesses?) to liking a tweet by JD™. This can actually tell you a lot about James and how his mind works. The tweet in question was JD Hall dunking on Jenna Ellis on the topic of Calvinism, about which she is hopelessly ignorant. Hall put Ellis in her place as only Polemics Santa can do, and White ate it all up. The thing is, James White has often complained about JD’s tactics, but what this little episode shows is that White never actually had an issue with him there. Rather, it was the fact that JD decided to use those same tactics against James. That’s when everything went sideways. It had nothing to do with Hall’s struggles from a few years back. So there’s the moral of the story. James is happy to associate with literally anyone, just as long as they attack the correct targets and focus on the correct issues. Anything that James deems to be friendly fire will get you voted off the island before you can say “sacralism.” And yes, I do have a PhD in James White Studies. Unfortunately, it’s not from an accredited school. 😢

Defiant Baptist

84,041 views • 23 days ago

As an early Christmas present for the brothers, I decided to take a break from my own personal “No Fly List” in order to comment on a recent clip from the Dividing Line. On today’s show, James White commented on a clip from Joel Webbon that was posted by Right Wing Watch. Specifically, White is incredulous (as he often is) over the idea of what Webbon calls “Holocaustianity,” the religion of the Post War Consensus. James can’t fathom how this religion could be used to bludgeon young white men. But thankfully, James White directs us to what was being said in 2024, so I decided to go check. What I found was James White demanding that Christians be put under church discipline if they simply laugh at memes that mock the official narrative of the Holocaust. You see, the reason that White can’t see Holocaustianity’s effect on young men is that he is absolutely steeped in it. It is the air he breathes, and no one challenging its doctrine will be tolerated. Merry Christmas, brothers. As always, I watch the slop so that you don’t have to. 🫡
4:50

As an early Christmas present for the brothers, I decided to take a break from my own personal “No Fly List” in order to comment on a recent clip from the Dividing Line. On today’s show, James White commented on a clip from Joel Webbon that was posted by Right Wing Watch. Specifically, White is incredulous (as he often is) over the idea of what Webbon calls “Holocaustianity,” the religion of the Post War Consensus. James can’t fathom how this religion could be used to bludgeon young white men. But thankfully, James White directs us to what was being said in 2024, so I decided to go check. What I found was James White demanding that Christians be put under church discipline if they simply laugh at memes that mock the official narrative of the Holocaust. You see, the reason that White can’t see Holocaustianity’s effect on young men is that he is absolutely steeped in it. It is the air he breathes, and no one challenging its doctrine will be tolerated. Merry Christmas, brothers. As always, I watch the slop so that you don’t have to. 🫡

Defiant Baptist

25,279 views • 9 months ago

This is some CRAZY work from James White. Today on the Dividing Line, he brought up how Joel Webbon is now discussing Holocaustianity, which James finds to be absurd and a distraction from the real problem: secularism. (But of course, Joel’s point is that Holocaustianity is the religion of secularism.) And then, with no self-awareness whatsoever, White reminds everyone of the controversy that *he* was directly involved with, where he sought to have a Christian man church disciplined and pastors defrocked…over a HOLOCAUST MEME. Can James White really not see that he was using the holocaust as a test for Christian fellowship? That he was making reverence for the holocaust into a gospel issue? How is that not Holocaustianity?! Well, my mind is blown. How is your’s?
4:08

This is some CRAZY work from James White. Today on the Dividing Line, he brought up how Joel Webbon is now discussing Holocaustianity, which James finds to be absurd and a distraction from the real problem: secularism. (But of course, Joel’s point is that Holocaustianity is the religion of secularism.) And then, with no self-awareness whatsoever, White reminds everyone of the controversy that *he* was directly involved with, where he sought to have a Christian man church disciplined and pastors defrocked…over a HOLOCAUST MEME. Can James White really not see that he was using the holocaust as a test for Christian fellowship? That he was making reverence for the holocaust into a gospel issue? How is that not Holocaustianity?! Well, my mind is blown. How is your’s?

Defiant Baptist

12,252 views • 5 months ago

How biblically ignorant do you have to be before you stop calling yourself a Christian Ethicist? I ask that because in his debate with Joel Webbon, Andrew Wilson was not aware of basic biblical principles such as being a slave to Christ. The clip below shows four instances of this happening. Overall, this debate “Do women have less agency than men?” was a missed opportunity. Webbon and Wilson have a lot in common, so there was no reason for Wilson to approach him as if he was some OF girl on the Whatever Podcast. I think the biggest issue was that Wilson refused to let Webbon define his position on agency. Andrew assumed that Joel would only base his arguments on the Bible, and when Joel didn’t, Andrew kept hammering that like it was some massive inconsistency. But as Joel patiently tried to explain, not everything that he believes is explicitly laid out in Scripture. There is natural law. There is observation. All these kinds of things. But for issues that aren’t directly addressed by Scripture, we can and should apply biblical principles where they can be found. I don’t get the sense that Andrew has ever used Scripture in this way. To me, it seems like his Christianity is tucked away in the corner so that it doesn’t get in the way of his debates. Just one man’s opinion. Anyway, I’m biased, but I thought Joel Webbon performed as well as could be expected, given the circumstances. Feel free to watch the whole debate below if you wish. Link:
6:38

How biblically ignorant do you have to be before you stop calling yourself a Christian Ethicist? I ask that because in his debate with Joel Webbon, Andrew Wilson was not aware of basic biblical principles such as being a slave to Christ. The clip below shows four instances of this happening. Overall, this debate “Do women have less agency than men?” was a missed opportunity. Webbon and Wilson have a lot in common, so there was no reason for Wilson to approach him as if he was some OF girl on the Whatever Podcast. I think the biggest issue was that Wilson refused to let Webbon define his position on agency. Andrew assumed that Joel would only base his arguments on the Bible, and when Joel didn’t, Andrew kept hammering that like it was some massive inconsistency. But as Joel patiently tried to explain, not everything that he believes is explicitly laid out in Scripture. There is natural law. There is observation. All these kinds of things. But for issues that aren’t directly addressed by Scripture, we can and should apply biblical principles where they can be found. I don’t get the sense that Andrew has ever used Scripture in this way. To me, it seems like his Christianity is tucked away in the corner so that it doesn’t get in the way of his debates. Just one man’s opinion. Anyway, I’m biased, but I thought Joel Webbon performed as well as could be expected, given the circumstances. Feel free to watch the whole debate below if you wish. Link:

Defiant Baptist

81,244 views • 24 days ago

So LeBron James is allowed to have DWade, Bosh, Kyrie, KLove, AD & Luka as teammates in their Primes, but it DOES NOT COUNT against him being the 🐐 But Michael Jordan having a Prime Scottie Pippen as his teammate DOES COUNT against his 🐐 status? Seriously? Are y'all on CRACK?
2:39

So LeBron James is allowed to have DWade, Bosh, Kyrie, KLove, AD & Luka as teammates in their Primes, but it DOES NOT COUNT against him being the 🐐 But Michael Jordan having a Prime Scottie Pippen as his teammate DOES COUNT against his 🐐 status? Seriously? Are y'all on CRACK?

𝕊𝕦𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕞𝕖𝟚𝟛

56,966 views • 4 months ago

🚨NEW: Professor Jiang fires back at Nick Fuentes "Nick Fuentes clearly has a political agenda. The guy is a smart guy but some of his conclusions are clearly manufactured. He's not working from first principles. Some of the things he says makes me think someone is paying him to say it. I don't know, but something is going on with Nick." Sneako defends Nick and says that he doesn't agree with Jiang's analysis.
0:55

🚨NEW: Professor Jiang fires back at Nick Fuentes "Nick Fuentes clearly has a political agenda. The guy is a smart guy but some of his conclusions are clearly manufactured. He's not working from first principles. Some of the things he says makes me think someone is paying him to say it. I don't know, but something is going on with Nick." Sneako defends Nick and says that he doesn't agree with Jiang's analysis.

Autism Capital 🧩

232,755 views • 7 months ago

It is totally unacceptable that dangerous terrorists and criminals are allowed to stay in the UK because of 'their' human rights. They should all be deported. We have to come out of the ECHR. With Nick Ferrari on LBC
1:03

It is totally unacceptable that dangerous terrorists and criminals are allowed to stay in the UK because of 'their' human rights. They should all be deported. We have to come out of the ECHR. With Nick Ferrari on LBC

Chris Philp MP

15,788 views • 10 months ago