Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

For those who may need a bit of additional clarification on the ruling by Judge Mrazik this afternoon, Alison Motta diagnosed and explained it during our Live today as it was happening. For the record, every lawyer in that Courtroom, and Judge Mrazik who I really think is a... show more

Defense Diaries

27,973 subscribers

33,287 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The judge in this Texas courtroom doesn’t put veterans who commit crimes in jail — instead, he runs a program that puts them on a path of rehabilitation. When it works, it wipes their records clean and provides a new beginning for those who have served the country.

The judge in this Texas courtroom doesn’t put veterans who commit crimes in jail — instead, he runs a program that puts them on a path of rehabilitation. When it works, it wipes their records clean and provides a new beginning for those who have served the country.

CBS Mornings

33,924 views • 2 years ago

Reporter: A judge ruled he should remain this country Leavitt: Who does that judge work for? It was an immigration judge who works for the DOJ at the direction of Pam Bondi

Reporter: A judge ruled he should remain this country Leavitt: Who does that judge work for? It was an immigration judge who works for the DOJ at the direction of Pam Bondi

Acyn

2,653,522 views • 1 year ago

Abbott: The judge who issued the opinion was overturned by a fifth circuit court last year for his most recent decision in redistricting and he got it wrong then. He got this one wrong now I feel confident the Supreme Court is going to agree that this decision was a gross misjudgment.

Abbott: The judge who issued the opinion was overturned by a fifth circuit court last year for his most recent decision in redistricting and he got it wrong then. He got this one wrong now I feel confident the Supreme Court is going to agree that this decision was a gross misjudgment.

Acyn

316,268 views • 8 months ago

For accuracy: Aidan’s affidavit was not impounded when it was first covered on online. This issue was expressly addressed during the hearing. The judge asked whether the affidavit was impounded, and defense counsel (Attorney Bradl) confirmed that it was not. The judge then stated that it was therefore a “public record.” The only remaining concern raised was whether the plaintiff’s address should have been removed. A temporary impoundment order was issued later in the hearing for the exhibits, at which point Bradl informed the court that some of the materials was already publicly available online. A public record is a public record. In Massachusetts, once a court record (like an affidavit) has already been lawfully made public—including be posted or shared on social media—impoundment of the official court record does not “unpublish” it or retroactively make the public version secret or inaccessible. The judge’s temporary impoundment order applies to the parties of record in the case. It is not surprising that Kate is so wrong on this point. She is doing exactly what the judge ordered must stop, and the judge certainly will not consider her meddling in his decision.

For accuracy: Aidan’s affidavit was not impounded when it was first covered on online. This issue was expressly addressed during the hearing. The judge asked whether the affidavit was impounded, and defense counsel (Attorney Bradl) confirmed that it was not. The judge then stated that it was therefore a “public record.” The only remaining concern raised was whether the plaintiff’s address should have been removed. A temporary impoundment order was issued later in the hearing for the exhibits, at which point Bradl informed the court that some of the materials was already publicly available online. A public record is a public record. In Massachusetts, once a court record (like an affidavit) has already been lawfully made public—including be posted or shared on social media—impoundment of the official court record does not “unpublish” it or retroactively make the public version secret or inaccessible. The judge’s temporary impoundment order applies to the parties of record in the case. It is not surprising that Kate is so wrong on this point. She is doing exactly what the judge ordered must stop, and the judge certainly will not consider her meddling in his decision.

KY Maverick

13,089 views • 3 months ago

Mike Lindell says the federal judge in his Smartmatic voter fraud case is now trapped. “When he did that twice in front of the judge, the judge was TRAPPED.” 🔥 During the trial, they tried to “prove” Smartmatic machines were secure with a live demo… and it completely backfired. 👊 Right in front of the judge, a voting machine was easily hacked, votes were changed, and the entire election was flipped — not once, but twice — using nothing more than a ballpoint pen. 🖊️🗳️ Mike was right - all along and he is still fighting.

Mike Lindell says the federal judge in his Smartmatic voter fraud case is now trapped. “When he did that twice in front of the judge, the judge was TRAPPED.” 🔥 During the trial, they tried to “prove” Smartmatic machines were secure with a live demo… and it completely backfired. 👊 Right in front of the judge, a voting machine was easily hacked, votes were changed, and the entire election was flipped — not once, but twice — using nothing more than a ballpoint pen. 🖊️🗳️ Mike was right - all along and he is still fighting.

Mike Lindell Offense Fund

279,714 views • 6 months ago

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel “I'm calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant's Daughter's company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father's courtroom - I wanna know the bank records because money doesn't lie - I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction - Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“ That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel “I'm calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant's Daughter's company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father's courtroom - I wanna know the bank records because money doesn't lie - I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction - Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“ That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.

Wall Street Apes

3,331,338 views • 1 year ago

Youtuber JiDion livestreamed his court hearing on Twitch. During the hearing, the Judge orders JiDion to stay away from the house that the squatter is in. He and his lawyer have asked the judge what will happen as JiDion is legally allowed to be on the property. This seems to have made the judge mad, and the judge asked whether the squatter is, in fact, squatting. To which the detective on the case answered that the squatter is being evicted on Friday, June 26th, but that no eviction papers were shown. To which the judge refuses to provide findings that the squatter is in fact a squatter.

Youtuber JiDion livestreamed his court hearing on Twitch. During the hearing, the Judge orders JiDion to stay away from the house that the squatter is in. He and his lawyer have asked the judge what will happen as JiDion is legally allowed to be on the property. This seems to have made the judge mad, and the judge asked whether the squatter is, in fact, squatting. To which the detective on the case answered that the squatter is being evicted on Friday, June 26th, but that no eviction papers were shown. To which the judge refuses to provide findings that the squatter is in fact a squatter.

Leigha Sapienti

11,890 views • 25 days ago

Who goes off an a judge while on zoom for court? This dude thought he was going to start swearing at the judge and the rest of the people on the call and nothing would happen. He woke the sleeping giant because the judge is clearly not having any of it. If big dumb were ever a person.

Who goes off an a judge while on zoom for court? This dude thought he was going to start swearing at the judge and the rest of the people on the call and nothing would happen. He woke the sleeping giant because the judge is clearly not having any of it. If big dumb were ever a person.

Giggling Ganon

198,933 views • 3 months ago

Judge Phahlane unprovoked, allegedly conceded that indeed when allegations of her being bribed were made it was November 2021, in her own words the case didn’t exist until she was appointed in May 2022. Now the anonymous tip off which was explicit in its nature detailing the name of the judge who is bribed and the involvement of the Judge President Dustan Mlambo in this conspiracy of defeating the end of justice is made before she is appointed as detailed in a letter addressed to the Justice cluster including the Chief justice Raymond Zondo. The million dollar question is whether the whistle-blower he or she is a prophet or a time traveller who went to the future from November 2021 and saw the appointment in May 2022. When this concessions were made by the Judge unprovoked we set back with hope that the Judge President will act on this serious allegations giving him the benefit of doubt that he forms no part in this shenanigans, his silence can only mean that Judge Phahlane was correct when she mentioned to the Murder and fraud accused Bhekumuzi Sandlana that the Judge president is her friend she will ask him to allocate the case of IPHC succession to her. Mr Ndala by January 2022 as he was aware of the route the case will take he went and made a press briefing intimating that he know when the case will commence and by dawn of 2022 it would have been concluded. The question is how many cases which Judge Phahlane presided over and ruled unfairly in favour of those who may have put a price for her to turn a blind eye. What is the extent of her friend the Judge president involvement in this allegations. The clips and the anonymous letter are self-explanatory for the country to make their own judgement.

Judge Phahlane unprovoked, allegedly conceded that indeed when allegations of her being bribed were made it was November 2021, in her own words the case didn’t exist until she was appointed in May 2022. Now the anonymous tip off which was explicit in its nature detailing the name of the judge who is bribed and the involvement of the Judge President Dustan Mlambo in this conspiracy of defeating the end of justice is made before she is appointed as detailed in a letter addressed to the Justice cluster including the Chief justice Raymond Zondo. The million dollar question is whether the whistle-blower he or she is a prophet or a time traveller who went to the future from November 2021 and saw the appointment in May 2022. When this concessions were made by the Judge unprovoked we set back with hope that the Judge President will act on this serious allegations giving him the benefit of doubt that he forms no part in this shenanigans, his silence can only mean that Judge Phahlane was correct when she mentioned to the Murder and fraud accused Bhekumuzi Sandlana that the Judge president is her friend she will ask him to allocate the case of IPHC succession to her. Mr Ndala by January 2022 as he was aware of the route the case will take he went and made a press briefing intimating that he know when the case will commence and by dawn of 2022 it would have been concluded. The question is how many cases which Judge Phahlane presided over and ruled unfairly in favour of those who may have put a price for her to turn a blind eye. What is the extent of her friend the Judge president involvement in this allegations. The clips and the anonymous letter are self-explanatory for the country to make their own judgement.

Modibe Vladimir Modiba

43,158 views • 8 months ago

🚨 BREAKING UPDATE: This r*pe and m*rder suspect HAS BEEN RE-ARRESTED after a judge let him run free in Florida. Imagine that...HE VIOLATED the no-contact order of his release. Thank GOD he is back in custody. It was unconscionable to release this thug. This judge is derelict. "The judge denied him bond - that's because he violated a no contact order with a witness in this case!"

🚨 BREAKING UPDATE: This rpe and mrder suspect HAS BEEN RE-ARRESTED after a judge let him run free in Florida. Imagine that...HE VIOLATED the no-contact order of his release. Thank GOD he is back in custody. It was unconscionable to release this thug. This judge is derelict. "The judge denied him bond - that's because he violated a no contact order with a witness in this case!"

Eric Daugherty

747,198 views • 9 months ago

REPORTER: A judge ordered that he should remain in this country. So are you saying that it's ok to ignore a judge's ruling if you don't like it? LEAVITT: It was an immigration judge who works for the DOJ at the direction of the AG, whose name is Pam Bondi

REPORTER: A judge ordered that he should remain in this country. So are you saying that it's ok to ignore a judge's ruling if you don't like it? LEAVITT: It was an immigration judge who works for the DOJ at the direction of the AG, whose name is Pam Bondi

Aaron Rupar

994,764 views • 1 year ago

Judge Frank Caprio was such a good hearted soul. Always enjoyed seeing him in the courtroom, because he never, ever felt intimidating. He was one of the few people who seemed like he was born to be a judge and lead, because he really did his best to help each person and not just punish. He was strangely comforting in a role that many of us naturally are afraid to be in front of. They called him the "World's Nicest Judge" and he truly deserved it. Found a clip he posted just yesterday on his page before he passed. He asked for prayers but more importantly, to be remembered. And I hope we honor that for him. Rest in love and light, Judge Caprio. Thank you for being one of the kind ones. 🪽

Judge Frank Caprio was such a good hearted soul. Always enjoyed seeing him in the courtroom, because he never, ever felt intimidating. He was one of the few people who seemed like he was born to be a judge and lead, because he really did his best to help each person and not just punish. He was strangely comforting in a role that many of us naturally are afraid to be in front of. They called him the "World's Nicest Judge" and he truly deserved it. Found a clip he posted just yesterday on his page before he passed. He asked for prayers but more importantly, to be remembered. And I hope we honor that for him. Rest in love and light, Judge Caprio. Thank you for being one of the kind ones. 🪽

Sassington, M.C.

137,256 views • 11 months ago

Judge Juan Merchan has ordered Donald Trump to be sentenced for 34 counts on January 10th ahead of inauguration Judge Merchan was never supposed to oversee Donald Trump’s case, he was specifically assigned the case to weaponize our legal system against Trump, here’s the proof “Understand there's absolutely no reason that Judge Merchan should have even had a chance to be assigned to this case? Now, I'm sure the left is just gonna call this a conspiracy theory. ‌ So I'll issue a challenge to them, and maybe they can tell me how he managed to be the judge. Because for these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. ‌ That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. So even though they're trying to claim that they didn't pick the judge, that it was randomly assigned, that's not possible because judge Merchan isn't in the pool to be randomly assigned. So the only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. ‌ And the wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. ‌ So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats. ‌ But, yeah, I'm sure this was just a coincidence. It was a coincidence that one of the most high profile cases ever, we didn't assign a judge, we assigned an acting judge. ‌ And that that judge somehow got selected even though he wasn't in the pool of judges available to be selected, and that that same judge that was selected also caught 2 other Trump related cases in the same year, and then that judge's daughter makes tens of millions of dollars a year promoting Democrats. Yeah. I'm sure that's all a coincidence.”

Wall Street Apes

514,459 views • 1 year ago

This may be the most corrupt thing I’ve ever heard in my life A Democrat federal judge made it illegal for Republicans to be poll watchers since the 80’s. Democrats have been renewing the injunction every 5 years. This only ended in 2020 READ THAT AGAIN “Something else people don't know is that start in the mid-1980s, there was a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers. So from mid-80’s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections. And what happened was that judge eventually died and the Democrats, the DNC, they had to go get that injunction renewed every 5-8 years, something along those lines. And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge, and they went back to that judge and they said, we want this consent decree in place making so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process. And he said, what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional. And he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction. So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in, you know, in in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places. What that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans were been going on for a long, long time, but there were no Republicans there to report on it.” Our elections have always been rigged by Democrats

This may be the most corrupt thing I’ve ever heard in my life A Democrat federal judge made it illegal for Republicans to be poll watchers since the 80’s. Democrats have been renewing the injunction every 5 years. This only ended in 2020 READ THAT AGAIN “Something else people don't know is that start in the mid-1980s, there was a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers. So from mid-80’s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections. And what happened was that judge eventually died and the Democrats, the DNC, they had to go get that injunction renewed every 5-8 years, something along those lines. And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge, and they went back to that judge and they said, we want this consent decree in place making so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process. And he said, what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional. And he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction. So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in, you know, in in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places. What that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans were been going on for a long, long time, but there were no Republicans there to report on it.” Our elections have always been rigged by Democrats

Wall Street Apes

2,309,954 views • 1 year ago

Today in Abuja, we received an important update from the court regarding the case between Very Dark Bully and Blord. The judge has recused herself from the case and ordered that it be reassigned to another judge. VDB appeared helpless and restless in the courtroom, as every plan he had was undermined by Sowore and his team. It is becoming clear that Verydarkbully is losing control of the situation. This is the reality of a bully....when they can no longer dominate, they grow furious. - Ctnaija

Today in Abuja, we received an important update from the court regarding the case between Very Dark Bully and Blord. The judge has recused herself from the case and ordered that it be reassigned to another judge. VDB appeared helpless and restless in the courtroom, as every plan he had was undermined by Sowore and his team. It is becoming clear that Verydarkbully is losing control of the situation. This is the reality of a bully....when they can no longer dominate, they grow furious. - Ctnaija

Death Note 📝

129,144 views • 2 months ago

JUST IN: Judge threatens to kick Donald Trump out of courtroom during E. Jean Carroll's defamation trial against him in New York. Trump reportedly taunted the judge in response by saying: "I would love it!" Judge: "Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive, which what has been reported to me consists of. And if he disregards court orders, Mr. Trump, I hope I don’t have to consider excluding you from the trial." Trump: *Throws hands up* Judge: "I understand you’re probably eager for me to do that." Trump: "I would love it!" The video below is Trump's deposition from 2022 where he told E. Jean Carroll’s lawyer to her face that she is not his type. 🔥

JUST IN: Judge threatens to kick Donald Trump out of courtroom during E. Jean Carroll's defamation trial against him in New York. Trump reportedly taunted the judge in response by saying: "I would love it!" Judge: "Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive, which what has been reported to me consists of. And if he disregards court orders, Mr. Trump, I hope I don’t have to consider excluding you from the trial." Trump: Throws hands up Judge: "I understand you’re probably eager for me to do that." Trump: "I would love it!" The video below is Trump's deposition from 2022 where he told E. Jean Carroll’s lawyer to her face that she is not his type. 🔥

Collin Rugg

5,571,480 views • 2 years ago

Impeach Judge Boasberg ! This man is not a judge he is a democrat activist, the fact that he is Chief judge in the DC circuit is an abomination, the perfect choice for the cesspool that is Wash. DC, he was Barack Obama’s appointment nearing the end of his first term and he has served his master well.

Impeach Judge Boasberg ! This man is not a judge he is a democrat activist, the fact that he is Chief judge in the DC circuit is an abomination, the perfect choice for the cesspool that is Wash. DC, he was Barack Obama’s appointment nearing the end of his first term and he has served his master well.

𝓜𝓐𝓖𝓐 𝕏 𝓣𝓘𝓜𝓔𝓢 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓝𝓔𝓦𝓢🇺🇸

12,100 views • 8 months ago

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria tried to bully us in court today while we await a judge handling our case and addressed the media. It was unbelievable! I don’t think he bargained for the resistance he got.

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria tried to bully us in court today while we await a judge handling our case and addressed the media. It was unbelievable! I don’t think he bargained for the resistance he got.

Omoyele Sowore

121,692 views • 3 months ago

Jordan: 77 million of them voted for the guy.. told us he was going to do the things he is doing and you have a judge in Timbuktu, California who could do an order or an injunction and stop that. That is not how our system is supposed to work.

Jordan: 77 million of them voted for the guy.. told us he was going to do the things he is doing and you have a judge in Timbuktu, California who could do an order or an injunction and stop that. That is not how our system is supposed to work.

Acyn

1,557,883 views • 1 year ago

Lindsey Graham didn’t just “go along” with the swamp; he is one of the major architects of it! In 2011, Graham voted YES to confirm Judge James Boasberg. Now look at what that decision has produced: - A federal judge who tried to go after Trump officials for carrying out deportation flights and enforcing our immigration law - A judge who was slapped down by an appeals court for overstepping his authority - A judge who blocked a grand jury investigation into Jerome Powell’s $2.5 BILLION Fed overspend This is the judiciary Lindsey Graham helped put in power. No accountability No law and order Not America First Lindsey Graham has consistently put judges in power who protect the status quo and punish anyone who challenges it. Graham had a choice, and he chose Boasberg. Americans are still living with the consequences.

Lindsey Graham didn’t just “go along” with the swamp; he is one of the major architects of it! In 2011, Graham voted YES to confirm Judge James Boasberg. Now look at what that decision has produced: - A federal judge who tried to go after Trump officials for carrying out deportation flights and enforcing our immigration law - A judge who was slapped down by an appeals court for overstepping his authority - A judge who blocked a grand jury investigation into Jerome Powell’s $2.5 BILLION Fed overspend This is the judiciary Lindsey Graham helped put in power. No accountability No law and order Not America First Lindsey Graham has consistently put judges in power who protect the status quo and punish anyone who challenges it. Graham had a choice, and he chose Boasberg. Americans are still living with the consequences.

Mark Lynch for U.S. Senate

54,365 views • 3 months ago