Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff says it's very unusual for command hallucinations to immediately stop after someone kills their child, while testifying in the Lindsay Clancy trial. Saathoff testified that Clancy's claim of only hearing command hallucinations during the time she was strangling her children is "unusual." "What was...

CollinRugg's profile picture

Collin Rugg

2,867,160 subscribers

325,120 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔴A prosecution expert is challenging Lindsay Clancy’s account in her murder trial. Dr. Gregory Saathoff testified that he does not believe she heard a voice commanding her to kill her three children. The forensic psychiatrist pointed to inconsistencies in her statements about the alleged hallucination. Saathoff, who evaluated Clancy for the prosecution, questioned key elements of the defense’s postpartum psychosis claim.
2:44

🔴A prosecution expert is challenging Lindsay Clancy’s account in her murder trial. Dr. Gregory Saathoff testified that he does not believe she heard a voice commanding her to kill her three children. The forensic psychiatrist pointed to inconsistencies in her statements about the alleged hallucination. Saathoff, who evaluated Clancy for the prosecution, questioned key elements of the defense’s postpartum psychosis claim.

Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social

82,275 views • 1 day ago

Forensic psychologist, Dr. Phillip Resnick, took the stand for the defense in Lindsay Clancy's trial today and testified that Lindsay "did not have control of her own body" after hearing the command to kill her children. "It was almost like she was a puppet and someone else was pulling the strings," he said. However, the prosecution called their own expert witness, who said Clancy "was suffering a major depressive episode."
0:38

Forensic psychologist, Dr. Phillip Resnick, took the stand for the defense in Lindsay Clancy's trial today and testified that Lindsay "did not have control of her own body" after hearing the command to kill her children. "It was almost like she was a puppet and someone else was pulling the strings," he said. However, the prosecution called their own expert witness, who said Clancy "was suffering a major depressive episode."

CBS News

38,724 views • 7 days ago

Earth shattering testimony from Dr. Gregory Saathoff destroys the defenses claim of acute psychosis with command hallucinations. Lindsay lied to Dr. Saathoff about the sequence of events surrounding Patrick’s errands on the day of the murders. She told Dr. Saathoff that she texted Patrick to get takeout and then looked up ThreeV to arrange the order but her phone history provides evidence of something much different. She looked up the restaurant, its distance, and time from their home an hour prior to suggesting it to her husband. Patrick testified that they had never gotten takeout from ThreeV, while Lindsay told Dr. Saathoff that it was the only restaurant that came to mind at the time. Lindsay had also google searched MiraLAX earlier that day but conveniently didn’t ask Patrick to pick it up for Cora until Patrick was leaving to go get food. Lindsay planned the sequence of events surrounding the murders. She wanted her husband out of the house and curated the time he would be gone so she could fulfill her plan. • 4:02 P.M: Lindsay google searched Kids MiraLAX. • 4:13 P.M: Lindsay google searched ThreeV and then Apple mapped the distance of the restaurant to their home. • 4:47 P.M: Lindsay calls the CVS to ask about MiraLAX • 4:53 P.M: Lindsay texts Patrick suggesting takeout from ThreeV. Patrick agrees. • 5:10 P.M: Lindsay orders takeout from ThreeV and Patrick leaves the house • 5:32 P.M: Patrick calls Lindsay, no answer • 5:33 P.M: Lindsay calls Patrick back (14 sec.) • 6:09 P.M: Patrick returns home and finds the children strangled in the basement Even more sadistically, she sent her husband to the store to pick up medicine for a child she knew he would NEVER see alive again. She spoke to him on the phone like nothing was wrong while she was in the middle of brutally strangling their 3 children to death. How could Lindsay have been having command hallucinations from an external voice telling her to kill the children and herself from the moment Patrick left until she finished strangling Callan when she had planned everything in advance? Think about how insane and cold blooded this sequence of events truly is.
7:14

Earth shattering testimony from Dr. Gregory Saathoff destroys the defenses claim of acute psychosis with command hallucinations. Lindsay lied to Dr. Saathoff about the sequence of events surrounding Patrick’s errands on the day of the murders. She told Dr. Saathoff that she texted Patrick to get takeout and then looked up ThreeV to arrange the order but her phone history provides evidence of something much different. She looked up the restaurant, its distance, and time from their home an hour prior to suggesting it to her husband. Patrick testified that they had never gotten takeout from ThreeV, while Lindsay told Dr. Saathoff that it was the only restaurant that came to mind at the time. Lindsay had also google searched MiraLAX earlier that day but conveniently didn’t ask Patrick to pick it up for Cora until Patrick was leaving to go get food. Lindsay planned the sequence of events surrounding the murders. She wanted her husband out of the house and curated the time he would be gone so she could fulfill her plan. • 4:02 P.M: Lindsay google searched Kids MiraLAX. • 4:13 P.M: Lindsay google searched ThreeV and then Apple mapped the distance of the restaurant to their home. • 4:47 P.M: Lindsay calls the CVS to ask about MiraLAX • 4:53 P.M: Lindsay texts Patrick suggesting takeout from ThreeV. Patrick agrees. • 5:10 P.M: Lindsay orders takeout from ThreeV and Patrick leaves the house • 5:32 P.M: Patrick calls Lindsay, no answer • 5:33 P.M: Lindsay calls Patrick back (14 sec.) • 6:09 P.M: Patrick returns home and finds the children strangled in the basement Even more sadistically, she sent her husband to the store to pick up medicine for a child she knew he would NEVER see alive again. She spoke to him on the phone like nothing was wrong while she was in the middle of brutally strangling their 3 children to death. How could Lindsay have been having command hallucinations from an external voice telling her to kill the children and herself from the moment Patrick left until she finished strangling Callan when she had planned everything in advance? Think about how insane and cold blooded this sequence of events truly is.

Morgan Ariel

84,346 views • 2 days ago

An FBI psychiatrist testified Wednesday that financial pressure was among the stressors weighing on Lindsay Clancy before she killed her three children. Dr. Gregory Saathoff said Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, had repeatedly delayed her return to work because she did not feel mentally healthy enough, and that she listed finances as a stressor in her own records. Believing "her brain had been damaged" and that she could no longer do the work she loved or help support her family, Saathoff said, left her with a sense of being a burden. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.
3:32

An FBI psychiatrist testified Wednesday that financial pressure was among the stressors weighing on Lindsay Clancy before she killed her three children. Dr. Gregory Saathoff said Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, had repeatedly delayed her return to work because she did not feel mentally healthy enough, and that she listed finances as a stressor in her own records. Believing "her brain had been damaged" and that she could no longer do the work she loved or help support her family, Saathoff said, left her with a sense of being a burden. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.

Fox True Crime

60,821 views • 2 days ago

Lindsay Clancy's mother testified Monday that her daughter confided in December 2022, while heavily medicated, that she was having thoughts of harming her children. Paula Musgrove told jurors her daughter seemed very nervous and said she had something to tell the family. "She told us that she had thoughts of harming the children," Musgrove testified. The account came as Clancy's defense presented its case in her triple murder trial.
0:20

Lindsay Clancy's mother testified Monday that her daughter confided in December 2022, while heavily medicated, that she was having thoughts of harming her children. Paula Musgrove told jurors her daughter seemed very nervous and said she had something to tell the family. "She told us that she had thoughts of harming the children," Musgrove testified. The account came as Clancy's defense presented its case in her triple murder trial.

Fox True Crime

106,333 views • 11 days ago

One month of testimony now comes down to closing arguments in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. The defense goes first this morning, arguing Clancy should not be held criminally responsible for killing her three young children because she was legally insane. Her attorney, Kevin Reddington, says he wants jurors to see her as a "marvelous, sweet, innocent person." Prosecutors are expected to hammer a much different picture, relying in part on testimony from forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory S. Saathoff that Clancy maintained control of her actions during the killings. Once both sides finish, the judge gives his instructions and the case goes to the jury.
2:03

One month of testimony now comes down to closing arguments in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. The defense goes first this morning, arguing Clancy should not be held criminally responsible for killing her three young children because she was legally insane. Her attorney, Kevin Reddington, says he wants jurors to see her as a "marvelous, sweet, innocent person." Prosecutors are expected to hammer a much different picture, relying in part on testimony from forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory S. Saathoff that Clancy maintained control of her actions during the killings. Once both sides finish, the judge gives his instructions and the case goes to the jury.

Fox News

89,742 views • 1 day ago

The Lindsay Clancy trial enters a critical stretch as dueling experts offer sharply different accounts of whether she understood her actions were wrong when she killed her three young children. The defense says postpartum psychosis, medication, and command hallucinations left her unable to control what she was doing. But prosecutors argue Clancy was not suffering from psychosis and point to what they describe as methodical actions leading up to killing her children. Now the case is moving toward closing arguments, with the jury ultimately deciding whether Clancy is criminally responsible. | Nate Foy
2:13

The Lindsay Clancy trial enters a critical stretch as dueling experts offer sharply different accounts of whether she understood her actions were wrong when she killed her three young children. The defense says postpartum psychosis, medication, and command hallucinations left her unable to control what she was doing. But prosecutors argue Clancy was not suffering from psychosis and point to what they describe as methodical actions leading up to killing her children. Now the case is moving toward closing arguments, with the jury ultimately deciding whether Clancy is criminally responsible. | Nate Foy

Fox News

142,208 views • 4 days ago

Important: the defence’s star witness Dr Kirk Helibrun testified that when Lindsay Clancy awoke in the hospital, she had no idea what had happened and then was told what happened by someone else ie someone coached under diminished mental capacity to confess to the murders of her children Lindsay couldn’t remember what had happened Credit: Jessethebusinessmom
0:57

Important: the defence’s star witness Dr Kirk Helibrun testified that when Lindsay Clancy awoke in the hospital, she had no idea what had happened and then was told what happened by someone else ie someone coached under diminished mental capacity to confess to the murders of her children Lindsay couldn’t remember what had happened Credit: Jessethebusinessmom

Gwen

70,413 views • 3 days ago

TRIAL UPDATE: Testimony continues in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, charged in the deaths of her three young children. Her defense argues she was experiencing severe postpartum psychosis and is not criminally responsible. During cross-examination of Clancy's former mother-in-law, a prosecutor asked if she was aware murder is a "mortal sin" in the Catholic Church; the judge immediately ordered the question stricken from the record. If convicted, Clancy faces life without parole; if found not guilty by reason of insanity, she will be committed to a state mental health facility.
1:00

TRIAL UPDATE: Testimony continues in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, charged in the deaths of her three young children. Her defense argues she was experiencing severe postpartum psychosis and is not criminally responsible. During cross-examination of Clancy's former mother-in-law, a prosecutor asked if she was aware murder is a "mortal sin" in the Catholic Church; the judge immediately ordered the question stricken from the record. If convicted, Clancy faces life without parole; if found not guilty by reason of insanity, she will be committed to a state mental health facility.

FOX & Friends

16,261 views • 9 days ago

"What's on trial here is what Lindsay Clancy did the night of January 24th, 2023." Plymouth County Assistant DA Jennifer Sprague tells jurors not to be distracted by arguments about the mental health system or how the system treats women, saying those issues are meant to make them "angry and passionate" but are not what the case against Lindsay Clancy is about. Sprague says the focus is Clancy's mental state when she killed her three children, arguing jurors can consider her psychological and treatment records to understand how she reached that point and what her motivation was.
0:49

"What's on trial here is what Lindsay Clancy did the night of January 24th, 2023." Plymouth County Assistant DA Jennifer Sprague tells jurors not to be distracted by arguments about the mental health system or how the system treats women, saying those issues are meant to make them "angry and passionate" but are not what the case against Lindsay Clancy is about. Sprague says the focus is Clancy's mental state when she killed her three children, arguing jurors can consider her psychological and treatment records to understand how she reached that point and what her motivation was.

Fox News

213,298 views • 1 day ago

Clinical and forensic psychologist Dr. Paul Zeizel testified on Wednesday that Lindsay Clancy suffered from bipolar disorder and postpartum psychosis at the time of the murder of her three children in January of 2023. Dr. Zeizel had worked with Clancy when she was hospitalized after her kids were killed. Clancy is facing three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of her three kids.
0:24

Clinical and forensic psychologist Dr. Paul Zeizel testified on Wednesday that Lindsay Clancy suffered from bipolar disorder and postpartum psychosis at the time of the murder of her three children in January of 2023. Dr. Zeizel had worked with Clancy when she was hospitalized after her kids were killed. Clancy is facing three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of her three kids.

CBS News

18,594 views • 8 days ago

🚨 Lindsay Clancy trial update The jury was questioned by the judge and then sent home early today. Court resumes tomorrow with a longer day expected. Closings are set for Monday. A defense witness, a hospital chaplain, testified that Clancy told her she heard a voice warning that if she didn’t obey the command, neither she nor her children would be safe. The defense is arguing postpartum psychosis. They claim she did not know what she was doing was wrong when she strangled her three children (ages 5, 3, and 8 months). The case is shaping up as a battle of the experts over mental health and medication.
5:31

🚨 Lindsay Clancy trial update The jury was questioned by the judge and then sent home early today. Court resumes tomorrow with a longer day expected. Closings are set for Monday. A defense witness, a hospital chaplain, testified that Clancy told her she heard a voice warning that if she didn’t obey the command, neither she nor her children would be safe. The defense is arguing postpartum psychosis. They claim she did not know what she was doing was wrong when she strangled her three children (ages 5, 3, and 8 months). The case is shaping up as a battle of the experts over mental health and medication.

Gunther Eagleman™

37,558 views • 8 days ago

Lindsay Clancy's sister, Allison Ozga, took the stand in Clancy's murder trial on Monday to share what her sister's mental health was like before allegedly killing her three children. "I had this gut feeling that something was off and that she was really struggling," Ozga said.
0:49

Lindsay Clancy's sister, Allison Ozga, took the stand in Clancy's murder trial on Monday to share what her sister's mental health was like before allegedly killing her three children. "I had this gut feeling that something was off and that she was really struggling," Ozga said.

CBS News

34,675 views • 10 days ago

WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT: A Massachusetts jury heard opening statements in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, who admitted to strangling her three young children, while her defense argued she was in the grip of severe postpartum mental illness
2:17

WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT: A Massachusetts jury heard opening statements in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, who admitted to strangling her three young children, while her defense argued she was in the grip of severe postpartum mental illness

Reuters

151,199 views • 1 month ago

Dr Kirk Heilbrun: "Command Hallucinations are often in about 88% of individuals reporting them, by one account, accompanied by a related delusion. Ms. Clancy did not report any accompanied delusions." I'm sorry is supposedly wanting her children "with" her so they wouldn't be separated, & wouldn't have to suffer after she was gone not considered delusional thinking?? Also, is the Prosecutions expert witness really citing Dr. Resnick?? Eventhough Dr. Resnick also evaluated Lindsay Clancy & determined she wasnt malingering?? 🤔
0:25

Dr Kirk Heilbrun: "Command Hallucinations are often in about 88% of individuals reporting them, by one account, accompanied by a related delusion. Ms. Clancy did not report any accompanied delusions." I'm sorry is supposedly wanting her children "with" her so they wouldn't be separated, & wouldn't have to suffer after she was gone not considered delusional thinking?? Also, is the Prosecutions expert witness really citing Dr. Resnick?? Eventhough Dr. Resnick also evaluated Lindsay Clancy & determined she wasnt malingering?? 🤔

Ivanka Gog

11,402 views • 3 days ago

Dr. Paul Zeizel, a clinical and forensic psychologist, took the stand on Tuesday, testifying that Clancy said she heard a male voice “ordering her … to kill her children.” Dr. Zeizel visited Lindsay Clancy in the hospital following her children’s deaths. He also testified that Clancy expressed love for her husband, Patrick, following the killings.
1:05

Dr. Paul Zeizel, a clinical and forensic psychologist, took the stand on Tuesday, testifying that Clancy said she heard a male voice “ordering her … to kill her children.” Dr. Zeizel visited Lindsay Clancy in the hospital following her children’s deaths. He also testified that Clancy expressed love for her husband, Patrick, following the killings.

CBS News

17,504 views • 9 days ago

The Prosecution called its best witness so far today Dr. Gregory Saathoff from the FBI's Behavioral analysis unit. His take is that Lindsay Clancy knew right from wrong and that is shown in her planning to buy a window of time where the kids could be killed.
4:20

The Prosecution called its best witness so far today Dr. Gregory Saathoff from the FBI's Behavioral analysis unit. His take is that Lindsay Clancy knew right from wrong and that is shown in her planning to buy a window of time where the kids could be killed.

Paul

28,010 views • 2 days ago

The more I watch of the Lindsay Clancy trial the more I become convinced that the strangulation of her 3 children was premeditated murder. Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun, who is testifying on behalf of the prosecution, testified today that there were a series of conscious decisions that had to be made in order to strangle the children, ruling out the possibility of psychosis. He opined that the evidence supports she committed the act of altruistic suicide, a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing the children out of “love.”
3:53

The more I watch of the Lindsay Clancy trial the more I become convinced that the strangulation of her 3 children was premeditated murder. Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun, who is testifying on behalf of the prosecution, testified today that there were a series of conscious decisions that had to be made in order to strangle the children, ruling out the possibility of psychosis. He opined that the evidence supports she committed the act of altruistic suicide, a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing the children out of “love.”

Morgan Ariel

96,161 views • 3 days ago

🔥🚨 PURE INSANITY — Candace Owens is defending Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother who admitted to strangling her three children, by stating she was driven into an “intentional psychosis” and is therefore not guilty. OWENS: "Lindsay Clancy is obviously not guilty. She was put into an intentional psychosis." Clancy does not dispute that she caused the deaths of her 5-year-old, 3-year-old, and infant. Her defense rests entirely on the claim that mental illness erased her criminal responsibility. Owens’ support joins a growing chorus of Liberal sympathy for the defendant.
0:51

🔥🚨 PURE INSANITY — Candace Owens is defending Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother who admitted to strangling her three children, by stating she was driven into an “intentional psychosis” and is therefore not guilty. OWENS: "Lindsay Clancy is obviously not guilty. She was put into an intentional psychosis." Clancy does not dispute that she caused the deaths of her 5-year-old, 3-year-old, and infant. Her defense rests entirely on the claim that mental illness erased her criminal responsibility. Owens’ support joins a growing chorus of Liberal sympathy for the defendant.

The Patriot Oasis™

107,676 views • 7 days ago

A nanny who took care of Lindsay Clancy's children said during her trial on Wednesday that she was "a wonderful mom who loved her kids." Elaine Rossi, the Clancy family's former nanny, testified that Clancy was concerned about her children's safety and Rossi said she loved her. Clancy is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of her three children: 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan. She's admitted to killing them in the basement of their home on Jan. 24, 2023.
0:39

A nanny who took care of Lindsay Clancy's children said during her trial on Wednesday that she was "a wonderful mom who loved her kids." Elaine Rossi, the Clancy family's former nanny, testified that Clancy was concerned about her children's safety and Rossi said she loved her. Clancy is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of her three children: 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan. She's admitted to killing them in the basement of their home on Jan. 24, 2023.

CBS News

71,559 views • 22 days ago