正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

•FORM 6 WAS CHANGED- NO‼️ •FORM 6 WAS MODIFIED- NO‼️ •Additional Declarations was asked along with Form 6- YES‼️ •Can ECI ask additional declaration along with Form 6- YES‼️ •Supreme Court has given authority to ECI to ask any additional documents in SIR without changing Form 6- YES‼️ Gyanesh... show more

कट्टर INDIA समर्थक 🦁🇮🇳 ™

14,786 subscribers

66,241 次观看 • 15 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 条评论

Nalneesh Kaushik 的头像

Nalneesh Kaushik15 天前

फॉर्म 6 के पूरे हंगामे की कहानी,,, कैसे लिब्रा🍒ओं इकोसिस्टम ने 'इंडियन एक्सप्रेस' की एक फ़र्ज़ी स्टोरी के चक्कर में खुद का मज़ाक बनवाया पूरी मज़ेदार कहानी😂😂अभी और मज़ा आना बाकी है👻👻👻

RashtraBhakt 的头像

RashtraBhakt15 天前

Exactly. The whole day Leftards were fooling gullible People around.

Srinivas 的头像

Srinivas15 天前

Where it is mentioned asking additional information, not in Form6 itself?

arun 的头像

arun15 天前

@grok is there any video from the a person who is claiming that his vote got deleted or any proof claiming that vote chori really happened?

vinod Kumar 的头像

vinod Kumar15 天前

How one after other Person being coming to defend EC Strategy... For this to defend and make protection as to make Modi Govt over EC ' s approach is correct .... For this how much funding could have Modi Govt would have made....?

Kapil Baldawa 的头像

Kapil Baldawa15 天前

Ye chutiyo ko samaj mein nahi aayega.. they r holding to anything which they can get and trying to create ruckus and misunderstanding

相关视频

Train with the correct form💪6 biceps exercise‼️

Train with the correct form💪6 biceps exercise‼️

Wealth Mail

214,336 次观看 • 7 个月前

"Did not approve modifications to Form 6- Supreme court bench led by Chief Justice contradicts EC press release which said SC upheld declaration for Form 6. EC now says it press release was speaking of declaration attached to Form 6 through Bihar SIR order which was approved by the SC on 27th May. Fiery conversation with Hitesh Jain Tehseen_Pasha Kailash Vasdev Sugata Srinivasaraju & Justice Sanjib Banerjee. In full

"Did not approve modifications to Form 6- Supreme court bench led by Chief Justice contradicts EC press release which said SC upheld declaration for Form 6. EC now says it press release was speaking of declaration attached to Form 6 through Bihar SIR order which was approved by the SC on 27th May. Fiery conversation with Hitesh Jain Tehseen_Pasha Kailash Vasdev Sugata Srinivasaraju & Justice Sanjib Banerjee. In full

barkha dutt

22,281 次观看 • 15 天前

Rahul Gandhi said 4 days ago that The online Form 6 was changed illegally. Today, CJI Surya Kant said the Supreme Court has not approved the modified Form 6. Ye Har baaari kaise thik ho jaate hai? 😭😭☠️😭

Rahul Gandhi said 4 days ago that The online Form 6 was changed illegally. Today, CJI Surya Kant said the Supreme Court has not approved the modified Form 6. Ye Har baaari kaise thik ho jaate hai? 😭😭☠️😭

Henry Singh

47,660 次观看 • 15 天前

'Suspend CEC' Pleas In SC SC has definitely upheld the power of ECI to modify Form 6... SC saying that they have not approved this current modification doesn't mean the ECI does not have the power to do so...: Eklavya Dwivedi, Standing Counsel For ECI, in conversation with ＠Shreyadhoundial on controversy around Form 6

'Suspend CEC' Pleas In SC SC has definitely upheld the power of ECI to modify Form 6... SC saying that they have not approved this current modification doesn't mean the ECI does not have the power to do so...: Eklavya Dwivedi, Standing Counsel For ECI, in conversation with ＠Shreyadhoundial on controversy around Form 6

TIMES NOW

70,024 次观看 • 15 天前

Author Anand Ranganathan said doubts over election integrity insult a billion Indians and held Gyanesh Kumar responsible. He defended the Election Commission amid questions over the Form 6 process and ECINET, saying the changes involved an additional declaration and did not alter the statutory form. #SIR #AnanRanganathan #GyaneshKumar #ElectionCommission #ECINET #IndiaFrist #ITTVReels

Author Anand Ranganathan said doubts over election integrity insult a billion Indians and held Gyanesh Kumar responsible. He defended the Election Commission amid questions over the Form 6 process and ECINET, saying the changes involved an additional declaration and did not alter the statutory form. #SIR #AnanRanganathan #GyaneshKumar #ElectionCommission #ECINET #IndiaFrist #ITTVReels

IndiaToday

143,411 次观看 • 26 天前

The Congress has once again resorted to attacking constitutional institutions out of fear of defeat, accusing the CEC of unilaterally modifying Form 6. Form 6 remains the same as before. The only additional requirement is seeking details of the applicant or their relatives in the previous SIR electoral roll, along with a declaration that the applicant has not acquired the citizenship of any other country. What is wrong with this and why are they objecting to it? Is their argument that people from Bangladesh and Pakistan should also be allowed to come here and vote? Watch. Asianet Suvarna News

The Congress has once again resorted to attacking constitutional institutions out of fear of defeat, accusing the CEC of unilaterally modifying Form 6. Form 6 remains the same as before. The only additional requirement is seeking details of the applicant or their relatives in the previous SIR electoral roll, along with a declaration that the applicant has not acquired the citizenship of any other country. What is wrong with this and why are they objecting to it? Is their argument that people from Bangladesh and Pakistan should also be allowed to come here and vote? Watch. Asianet Suvarna News

Tejasvi Surya

20,013 次观看 • 8 天前

Form 6 controversy: What is the difference between amending Form 6 and appending an annexure to it? In this clip from Scrutiny, Anand Ranganathan breaks down the Form 6 and Annexure D controversy surrounding the Bihar and Bengal SIR exercises. Anand explains what he says the Supreme Court considered during the Bihar SIR case, what changed during the Bengal SIR and how an "ambiguous remark" by the SC has fuelled political claims and confusion. #AnandRanganathan #SIR #ElectionCommission #RahulGandhi #SupremeCourt #Form6 #AnnexureD #Scrutiny #TimesAxis Watch the full video 👉 Anand Ranganathan Aditi Prasad

Form 6 controversy: What is the difference between amending Form 6 and appending an annexure to it? In this clip from Scrutiny, Anand Ranganathan breaks down the Form 6 and Annexure D controversy surrounding the Bihar and Bengal SIR exercises. Anand explains what he says the Supreme Court considered during the Bihar SIR case, what changed during the Bengal SIR and how an "ambiguous remark" by the SC has fuelled political claims and confusion. #AnandRanganathan #SIR #ElectionCommission #RahulGandhi #SupremeCourt #Form6 #AnnexureD #Scrutiny #TimesAxis Watch the full video 👉 Anand Ranganathan Aditi Prasad

The Times Of India

38,011 次观看 • 11 天前

#TheBuckStopsHere with Padmaja Joshi | Form 6 modification: SC contradicts ECI claim "Software issue is blamed for not being able to add Goa voters to the voter list denying them dialysis. Software issue is blamed saying that Form 6 amendment was made compulsory instead of being optional. Software issue is blamed or maybe some lower level bureaucrat is blamed for a press release issued by the ECI. Are you running a joke?" NCP-SP's Anish Gawande

#TheBuckStopsHere with Padmaja Joshi | Form 6 modification: SC contradicts ECI claim "Software issue is blamed for not being able to add Goa voters to the voter list denying them dialysis. Software issue is blamed saying that Form 6 amendment was made compulsory instead of being optional. Software issue is blamed or maybe some lower level bureaucrat is blamed for a press release issued by the ECI. Are you running a joke?" NCP-SP's Anish Gawande

NDTV

15,756 次观看 • 15 天前

ECI TRYING TO DELETE MY VOTE???? That too since December 2025? But SIR WAS ANNOUNCED A FEW DAYS AGO? No? Gyanesh kumar ji and ECI should take a note of this and mend their "MISTAKE" !! I never filed for a Form 7 (deletion of my vote) with the election commission of India!!

ECI TRYING TO DELETE MY VOTE???? That too since December 2025? But SIR WAS ANNOUNCED A FEW DAYS AGO? No? Gyanesh kumar ji and ECI should take a note of this and mend their "MISTAKE" !! I never filed for a Form 7 (deletion of my vote) with the election commission of India!!

Ranting gola

364,278 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dictatorship is here‼️No one is doing ANYTHING‼️What Americans were dreading has come to pass. The United States has profoundly changed in 6 months with an authoritarian leader‼️

Dictatorship is here‼️No one is doing ANYTHING‼️What Americans were dreading has come to pass. The United States has profoundly changed in 6 months with an authoritarian leader‼️

Meidas_Charise Lee

37,903 次观看 • 1 年前

Prakash Raj has made a video saying his name has been deleted from voter roll. Yes, thats true. Because he may have "permanently shifted" his residence, was not available for BLO to give form. I think State Election Commission is doing a good job. If he wishes to be part of Karnataka's electoral roll with a valid residence, he can call up BLO ask for rolling back. Or if he has no time, given his busy schedule for propaganda, he can fill FORM 6 (online on ECI app) with Karnataka address and register as a new voter between August 24th and September 23rd. If he follows this procedure, he will be included in final voter roll that will be published on 27th October. Basics!

Prakash Raj has made a video saying his name has been deleted from voter roll. Yes, thats true. Because he may have "permanently shifted" his residence, was not available for BLO to give form. I think State Election Commission is doing a good job. If he wishes to be part of Karnataka's electoral roll with a valid residence, he can call up BLO ask for rolling back. Or if he has no time, given his busy schedule for propaganda, he can fill FORM 6 (online on ECI app) with Karnataka address and register as a new voter between August 24th and September 23rd. If he follows this procedure, he will be included in final voter roll that will be published on 27th October. Basics!

Karthik Reddy

136,020 次观看 • 2 个月前

CEC Row | Apex Court Puts ECI on 'Notice' Most people don’t know what changes were made to Form 6. I’d like to tell that they are very minor changes but essential for preserving democracy in India: ＠jai_a_dehadrai speaks to ＠shreyadhoundial I want to make the point that the SC made that you had no business putting out the press note specifically saying the Form 6 amendment had been approved by the SC when it had not...: SANJAY HEGDE slams EC

CEC Row | Apex Court Puts ECI on 'Notice' Most people don’t know what changes were made to Form 6. I’d like to tell that they are very minor changes but essential for preserving democracy in India: ＠jai_a_dehadrai speaks to ＠shreyadhoundial I want to make the point that the SC made that you had no business putting out the press note specifically saying the Form 6 amendment had been approved by the SC when it had not...: SANJAY HEGDE slams EC

TIMES NOW

39,714 次观看 • 15 天前

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP National Spokesperson and MP Sambit Patra says, "Rahul Gandhi misled the public on two counts. First, he claimed that Form 6 was illegal—specifically mentioning the Bharatiya Janata Party in this context. However, the Court did not declare Form 6 illegal today. It noted that the petition mentioned a modification to Form 6, so the Court said it would look into the matter. We had not consented to any such modification. If any modification has indeed taken place, that will become clear only after a notice is issued. Yet, when we read the detailed order and look at the Election Commission's press release dated September 26, 2018, it becomes evident that the Commission had clearly stated there were no changes to Form 6 and that the Supreme Court had validated the declaration form attached to it. Therefore, there is no ambiguity here. Rahul Gandhi is lying when he claims that Form 6 was illegal and that the Supreme Court has said so today. This is exactly like the Rafale issue, where Rahul Gandhi claimed the Supreme Court had spoken of massive irregularities; later, he had to submit an affidavit to that very Supreme Court and offer an unconditional apology. The same thing is going to happen here. There are consequences for lying. The second issue on which Rahul Gandhi misled the public is his claim that the decision was not unanimous. This decision was not unanimous; meaning, the three Election Commissioners did not arrive at this decision collectively. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has clarified this in its fact-check. The first point of the fact-check states that the order regarding the SIR in Bihar, issued on June 24, 2025, was released with the unanimous approval of the Commission; this order was subsequently upheld by the Honorable Supreme Court of India in its judgment dated May 27, 2026. It was indeed a unanimous decision, leaving no room for doubt. I remember this clearly because we held a press conference that day; when the press release was issued, the three Election Commissioners posed for a photograph together, and that very image was released to the public. On both these counts—these two specific issues—Rahul Gandhi attempted to mislead the nation and the public, effectively trying to create a state of anarchy"

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP National Spokesperson and MP Sambit Patra says, "Rahul Gandhi misled the public on two counts. First, he claimed that Form 6 was illegal—specifically mentioning the Bharatiya Janata Party in this context. However, the Court did not declare Form 6 illegal today. It noted that the petition mentioned a modification to Form 6, so the Court said it would look into the matter. We had not consented to any such modification. If any modification has indeed taken place, that will become clear only after a notice is issued. Yet, when we read the detailed order and look at the Election Commission's press release dated September 26, 2018, it becomes evident that the Commission had clearly stated there were no changes to Form 6 and that the Supreme Court had validated the declaration form attached to it. Therefore, there is no ambiguity here. Rahul Gandhi is lying when he claims that Form 6 was illegal and that the Supreme Court has said so today. This is exactly like the Rafale issue, where Rahul Gandhi claimed the Supreme Court had spoken of massive irregularities; later, he had to submit an affidavit to that very Supreme Court and offer an unconditional apology. The same thing is going to happen here. There are consequences for lying. The second issue on which Rahul Gandhi misled the public is his claim that the decision was not unanimous. This decision was not unanimous; meaning, the three Election Commissioners did not arrive at this decision collectively. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has clarified this in its fact-check. The first point of the fact-check states that the order regarding the SIR in Bihar, issued on June 24, 2025, was released with the unanimous approval of the Commission; this order was subsequently upheld by the Honorable Supreme Court of India in its judgment dated May 27, 2026. It was indeed a unanimous decision, leaving no room for doubt. I remember this clearly because we held a press conference that day; when the press release was issued, the three Election Commissioners posed for a photograph together, and that very image was released to the public. On both these counts—these two specific issues—Rahul Gandhi attempted to mislead the nation and the public, effectively trying to create a state of anarchy"

ANI

32,374 次观看 • 15 天前

What exactly is the objection — to the entire SIR exercise, Gyanesh Kumar allegedly turning the EC into a one-man show, the centralised software deciding voter eligibility, or the changes to Form 6? What is the specific objection that you believe amounts to a violation of the law? Anjali Bhardwaj responds. Listen in. #SIR #GyaneshKumar #ElectionCommission #ECI #Form6 #VoterRolls #ElectionNews #IndianPolitics #VoterRights #NewsToday Rajdeep Sardesai

What exactly is the objection — to the entire SIR exercise, Gyanesh Kumar allegedly turning the EC into a one-man show, the centralised software deciding voter eligibility, or the changes to Form 6? What is the specific objection that you believe amounts to a violation of the law? Anjali Bhardwaj responds. Listen in. #SIR #GyaneshKumar #ElectionCommission #ECI #Form6 #VoterRolls #ElectionNews #IndianPolitics #VoterRights #NewsToday Rajdeep Sardesai

IndiaToday

206,537 次观看 • 26 天前

AAP National Media In-charge Anurag Dhanda said, "Yesterday, we had asked the Delhi Election Commission under what process Raghav Chadha ji's name was added to Delhi's voter list during SIR. The Election Commission itself has acknowledged that Form 6, 7, or 8 is required for adding a vote. But in Rajinder Nagar, Raghav Chadha ji's name is not in any list of Form 6 filed after August 31. So the question remains the same: Where did Raghav Chadha ji's 747th vote come from? Under what process was it added?"

AAP National Media In-charge Anurag Dhanda said, "Yesterday, we had asked the Delhi Election Commission under what process Raghav Chadha ji's name was added to Delhi's voter list during SIR. The Election Commission itself has acknowledged that Form 6, 7, or 8 is required for adding a vote. But in Rajinder Nagar, Raghav Chadha ji's name is not in any list of Form 6 filed after August 31. So the question remains the same: Where did Raghav Chadha ji's 747th vote come from? Under what process was it added?"

The Times Of India

18,609 次观看 • 1 个月前

#Exclusive | Kapil Sibal raises questions over the centralisation of the ECI’s IT system, alleged wrongful voter deletions in West Bengal and changes to Form 6. He argues that the scale and uniformity of the alleged deletions raise questions about how the system was operated and why the statutory powers of EROs were changed. #EC #SIR #Form6 #ECI #ElectionsInIndia #GyaneshKumar #NewsToday | Rajdeep Sardesai

#Exclusive | Kapil Sibal raises questions over the centralisation of the ECI’s IT system, alleged wrongful voter deletions in West Bengal and changes to Form 6. He argues that the scale and uniformity of the alleged deletions raise questions about how the system was operated and why the statutory powers of EROs were changed. #EC #SIR #Form6 #ECI #ElectionsInIndia #GyaneshKumar #NewsToday | Rajdeep Sardesai

IndiaToday

16,005 次观看 • 27 天前

“Chuck up the pray up!” BANG ‼️ 🤣🤣🤣 this girl. She was 17pt/17reb with 6 TO. Does she deserve this level of shade though?

“Chuck up the pray up!” BANG ‼️ 🤣🤣🤣 this girl. She was 17pt/17reb with 6 TO. Does she deserve this level of shade though?

IDX-Texas

35,958 次观看 • 4 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: On Indian Express report on 2 ECs objecting to discrepancies in SIR process, Congress MP Pawan Khera says, "... The point was that 'Form 6' is a statutory form; it cannot be amended—nor can the governing rules (dating back to 1960) be altered—without going to Parliament. Was this matter addressed in today's press release or meeting?... This is the very foundation of the entire argument, yet they made no mention of it. What kind of propaganda are they running?... You introduced the modified Form 6 without amending those 1960 rules, resulting in the disenfranchisement of many people in Bihar and Bengal—their right to vote was taken away illegally. If the right to vote was stripped away illegally in Bihar and Bengal, can that election be considered legal?... The powers of the ERO regarding additions to and deletions from the electoral roll were stripped away and centralized; now, ECI-Net handles that from Delhi... We repeatedly insist on resignations; someone must be punished for these lapses. Furthermore, there is no mention here of the 'VIP' category you created, which effectively relegated others to the status of 'second-class citizens.' This press release is hollow..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Indian Express report on 2 ECs objecting to discrepancies in SIR process, Congress MP Pawan Khera says, "... The point was that 'Form 6' is a statutory form; it cannot be amended—nor can the governing rules (dating back to 1960) be altered—without going to Parliament. Was this matter addressed in today's press release or meeting?... This is the very foundation of the entire argument, yet they made no mention of it. What kind of propaganda are they running?... You introduced the modified Form 6 without amending those 1960 rules, resulting in the disenfranchisement of many people in Bihar and Bengal—their right to vote was taken away illegally. If the right to vote was stripped away illegally in Bihar and Bengal, can that election be considered legal?... The powers of the ERO regarding additions to and deletions from the electoral roll were stripped away and centralized; now, ECI-Net handles that from Delhi... We repeatedly insist on resignations; someone must be punished for these lapses. Furthermore, there is no mention here of the 'VIP' category you created, which effectively relegated others to the status of 'second-class citizens.' This press release is hollow..."

ANI

52,721 次观看 • 24 天前