Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Former Army Ranger Matt Tardio came on today to debunk the "exploding microphone" theory and explain the science behind the .30-06 bullet that killed Charlie. We don't like doing segments like this one, but it's necessary to fight the cultists committed to helping Tyler Robinson escape justice at all costs.

Blake Neff

89,191 subscribers

672,361 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Candace Owens is now pushing the exploding microphone theory. The “evidence” that she’s using to back her theory is a YouTube video of people using explosives. In the video they mention that the explosive left similar damage to a shot from a .30-06. BUT WAIT ✋ For 9 months Candace and her fans have said there’s no way that Charlie got shot with a .30-06 because it would’ve done more damage. Now they’re saying he was killed by an exploding microphone and the “evidence” they’re using to back up these claims is that an exploding microphone would cause damage similar to .30-06 shot. So what they’re saying is theres no way Charlie was shot by a .30-06 because wounds don’t match that. But he definitely got killed by an exploding microphone that left the same wound as a .30-06 so everyone would be tricked into believing he was shot. I’ve tried to explain the flaw in this logic to Candace’s fans like they’re in kindergarten but they’re too dumb to understand how this totally contradicts everything they’ve been saying.

Candace Owens is now pushing the exploding microphone theory. The “evidence” that she’s using to back her theory is a YouTube video of people using explosives. In the video they mention that the explosive left similar damage to a shot from a .30-06. BUT WAIT ✋ For 9 months Candace and her fans have said there’s no way that Charlie got shot with a .30-06 because it would’ve done more damage. Now they’re saying he was killed by an exploding microphone and the “evidence” they’re using to back up these claims is that an exploding microphone would cause damage similar to .30-06 shot. So what they’re saying is theres no way Charlie was shot by a .30-06 because wounds don’t match that. But he definitely got killed by an exploding microphone that left the same wound as a .30-06 so everyone would be tricked into believing he was shot. I’ve tried to explain the flaw in this logic to Candace’s fans like they’re in kindergarten but they’re too dumb to understand how this totally contradicts everything they’ve been saying.

Cinema Shogun

12,972 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.

Cinema Shogun

19,276 views • 22 days ago

We told you they were planning to fabricate DNA evidence to frame Tyler Robinson for the assassination of Charlie Kirk and just like clockwork Liz “Binder-Gate” Wheeler comes in to explain why you need to trust the science.

We told you they were planning to fabricate DNA evidence to frame Tyler Robinson for the assassination of Charlie Kirk and just like clockwork Liz “Binder-Gate” Wheeler comes in to explain why you need to trust the science.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

73,953 views • 7 months ago

🚨Baron Coleman just uncovered a crucial detail that undermines the 30-06 narrative completely! According to this expert’s testimony, the range for size of the bullet recovered from Charlie was between .286 and .301 inches in diameter. 👀 On the other hand, a 30-06 bullet is a projectile that measures .308 inches in diameter. In other words, there's no match! This expert’s testimony eliminates the possibility that the bullet was a 30-06, thereby exonerating Tyler Robinson of all charges.

🚨Baron Coleman just uncovered a crucial detail that undermines the 30-06 narrative completely! According to this expert’s testimony, the range for size of the bullet recovered from Charlie was between .286 and .301 inches in diameter. 👀 On the other hand, a 30-06 bullet is a projectile that measures .308 inches in diameter. In other words, there's no match! This expert’s testimony eliminates the possibility that the bullet was a 30-06, thereby exonerating Tyler Robinson of all charges.

Travis

171,456 views • 12 days ago

.Clay Travis to Charlie Kirk murder conspiracy theorists: "It seems overwhelming to me, based on all the evidence, that Tyler Robinson committed this shooting."

.Clay Travis to Charlie Kirk murder conspiracy theorists: "It seems overwhelming to me, based on all the evidence, that Tyler Robinson committed this shooting."

The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show

51,302 views • 16 days ago

Here we discuss if Charlie Kirk's body motion after impact best supports Exploding Mic Theory. We compare this to palm pistol and 30-06. Based on momentum, Charlie was not likely hit from the back.

Here we discuss if Charlie Kirk's body motion after impact best supports Exploding Mic Theory. We compare this to palm pistol and 30-06. Based on momentum, Charlie was not likely hit from the back.

Spirit of Admetos

21,390 views • 25 days ago

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

Liz Wheeler

46,330 views • 3 months ago

🚨 FLOODED WITH TYLER ROBINSON DOUBLES - BUT NO REAL TYLER 🚨 At and around UVU during Charlie Kirk’s assassination, cameras caught multiple men who looked just like the FBI’s alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. But not one clip shows the ACTUAL Tyler Robinson on campus that day. Not one. And if you wanted to frame a patsy? Wouldn't this be the perfect way to do it? Flood the scene with doubles, blur the truth, and let the cameras write the story. So what really happened?

🚨 FLOODED WITH TYLER ROBINSON DOUBLES - BUT NO REAL TYLER 🚨 At and around UVU during Charlie Kirk’s assassination, cameras caught multiple men who looked just like the FBI’s alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. But not one clip shows the ACTUAL Tyler Robinson on campus that day. Not one. And if you wanted to frame a patsy? Wouldn't this be the perfect way to do it? Flood the scene with doubles, blur the truth, and let the cameras write the story. So what really happened?

HustleBitch

616,014 views • 9 months ago

The media and Democrats have been calling Trump and his voters fascists for years Which lead to Tyler Robinson putting it on the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk.... You can never hate these people enough

The media and Democrats have been calling Trump and his voters fascists for years Which lead to Tyler Robinson putting it on the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk.... You can never hate these people enough

@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

108,081 views • 10 months ago

Holy heck! This Karen OPENED THE DOOR of the DHS vehicle and attempted to help one of the detainees escape. The agent had to pull his firearm on her. Looks to me like she committed a felony attempting to help that detainee escape. U.S. Department of Justice Homeland Security

Holy heck! This Karen OPENED THE DOOR of the DHS vehicle and attempted to help one of the detainees escape. The agent had to pull his firearm on her. Looks to me like she committed a felony attempting to help that detainee escape. U.S. Department of Justice Homeland Security

Kim "Katie" USA

4,198,062 views • 8 months ago

Tyler Robinson DEFINITELY DID NOT kill Charlie Kirk. He is a PATSY, just like I said from the beginning. The “bullet” that supposedly hit Charlie in the neck DOES NOT match the rifle said to be shot by Robinson. Then, the police officer who served for 30 years that supposedly “forced” a confession out of Robinson just quit, right as the aforementioned fact came to light. Really? You don’t say. That is some CRAZY timing…

Tyler Robinson DEFINITELY DID NOT kill Charlie Kirk. He is a PATSY, just like I said from the beginning. The “bullet” that supposedly hit Charlie in the neck DOES NOT match the rifle said to be shot by Robinson. Then, the police officer who served for 30 years that supposedly “forced” a confession out of Robinson just quit, right as the aforementioned fact came to light. Really? You don’t say. That is some CRAZY timing…

The Patriot Voice

76,935 views • 3 months ago

Just had Jay Town, former U.S. Attorney and career prosecutor, break down the newly released ATF report from the Tyler Robinson trial. The bullet pulled from Charlie was a .30 caliber round. It matches the operable .30-06 rifle found at the scene, which was loaded with Tyler Robinson's DNA. Tool marks prove the spent shell casing came from that gun. All cartridges were Remington with matching bunter marks from the same batch. The DailyMail's "bullet didn't match" narrative ended up being total media malpractice as predicted. The report said it could not be identified OR EXCLUDED, but they ignored that when trying to get clicks.

Just had Jay Town, former U.S. Attorney and career prosecutor, break down the newly released ATF report from the Tyler Robinson trial. The bullet pulled from Charlie was a .30 caliber round. It matches the operable .30-06 rifle found at the scene, which was loaded with Tyler Robinson's DNA. Tool marks prove the spent shell casing came from that gun. All cartridges were Remington with matching bunter marks from the same batch. The DailyMail's "bullet didn't match" narrative ended up being total media malpractice as predicted. The report said it could not be identified OR EXCLUDED, but they ignored that when trying to get clicks.

Andrew Kolvet

70,578 views • 3 months ago

Charlie Kirk was [redacted] by a radical leftist Tyler Robinson. The state could have used it to go after the organizations like the DSA and Antifa. "All of a sudden everybody started to muddy the waters and blame it on Israel... This is what the left is doing."

Charlie Kirk was [redacted] by a radical leftist Tyler Robinson. The state could have used it to go after the organizations like the DSA and Antifa. "All of a sudden everybody started to muddy the waters and blame it on Israel... This is what the left is doing."

Asuka Groyper 🚬

328,322 views • 28 days ago

Well, not everything was fake. The bullet wound was, and the blood event surely was. But not the electric current sent through the microphone. That is what killed Charlie. It was like a magician's sly of hand, who does one thing with one hand, to distract everyone's attention, while doing his trick with the other hand. And there were a lot of other actors involved too. You can see two of the actors in the last 4th video. But actors, or not, Charlie is still dead. So, we still need to get to the bottom of this.

Well, not everything was fake. The bullet wound was, and the blood event surely was. But not the electric current sent through the microphone. That is what killed Charlie. It was like a magician's sly of hand, who does one thing with one hand, to distract everyone's attention, while doing his trick with the other hand. And there were a lot of other actors involved too. You can see two of the actors in the last 4th video. But actors, or not, Charlie is still dead. So, we still need to get to the bottom of this.

US_did_ 911

189,085 views • 7 months ago

Tucker Carlson claims Israel killed Charlie Kirk… But is there PROOF of this? “Charlie Kirk was murdered, and he was not murdered for his opinions on transgenderism, obviously. He was, I believe, and most people who knew him well as I did and was friends with him as I was, believe he was most likely murdered for his evolving views on Israel,” Tucker stated, without evidence to support his claim. Over nine months have passed since Charlie was assassinated and the only evidence that people like Tucker can produce that Israel killed Charlie is their own increasing malice toward Israel. In reality, Charlie penned a seven-page letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on May 2nd, 2025—approximately four months prior to Charlie's murder. In this letter, Charlie offered to help Israel craft their outreach to young Americans in order to more effectively fight the brain rot of anti-Semitism that Charlie was seeing increasing on the college campuses that he visited. “His evolving views on Israel”—this evolution didn't exist in any evidentiary way. The actual evidence of why Charlie was murdered clearly demonstrates that Tyler Robinson committed this murder and was motivated by a pro-transgender ideology. Let's review just a few of these points: -Tyler Robinson was dating a transgender named Lance Twiggs who called himself Luna. -Tyler Robinson and his transgender lover were into furry pornography. -Tyler Robinson carved furry symbols on bullets. -Tyler Robinson carved “hey fascist! CATCH! ↑→↓↓↓” on one bullet. This is emblematic of the transgender ideology, which is at its heart, a neo-Marxist ideology. -Tyler Robinson's own mother said he was increasingly pro-trans in his politics. -Tyler Robinson called Charlie hateful. -Tyler Robinson wrote in a handwritten note to his transgender lover, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it.” -Tyler Robinson then texted his transgender lover, “I had enough of his, Charlie Kirk's hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out.” -Tyler Robinson then told his parents after they confronted him about killing Charlie: “there is too much evil and the guy [Charlie Kirk] spreads too much hate.” There is zero evidence for Tucker's accusation that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.

Sensitive content

Tucker Carlson claims Israel killed Charlie Kirk… But is there PROOF of this? “Charlie Kirk was murdered, and he was not murdered for his opinions on transgenderism, obviously. He was, I believe, and most people who knew him well as I did and was friends with him as I was, believe he was most likely murdered for his evolving views on Israel,” Tucker stated, without evidence to support his claim. Over nine months have passed since Charlie was assassinated and the only evidence that people like Tucker can produce that Israel killed Charlie is their own increasing malice toward Israel. In reality, Charlie penned a seven-page letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on May 2nd, 2025—approximately four months prior to Charlie's murder. In this letter, Charlie offered to help Israel craft their outreach to young Americans in order to more effectively fight the brain rot of anti-Semitism that Charlie was seeing increasing on the college campuses that he visited. “His evolving views on Israel”—this evolution didn't exist in any evidentiary way. The actual evidence of why Charlie was murdered clearly demonstrates that Tyler Robinson committed this murder and was motivated by a pro-transgender ideology. Let's review just a few of these points: -Tyler Robinson was dating a transgender named Lance Twiggs who called himself Luna. -Tyler Robinson and his transgender lover were into furry pornography. -Tyler Robinson carved furry symbols on bullets. -Tyler Robinson carved “hey fascist! CATCH! ↑→↓↓↓” on one bullet. This is emblematic of the transgender ideology, which is at its heart, a neo-Marxist ideology. -Tyler Robinson's own mother said he was increasingly pro-trans in his politics. -Tyler Robinson called Charlie hateful. -Tyler Robinson wrote in a handwritten note to his transgender lover, “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it.” -Tyler Robinson then texted his transgender lover, “I had enough of his, Charlie Kirk's hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out.” -Tyler Robinson then told his parents after they confronted him about killing Charlie: “there is too much evil and the guy [Charlie Kirk] spreads too much hate.” There is zero evidence for Tucker's accusation that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.

Liz Wheeler

37,264 views • 29 days ago

INVESTIGATING CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION Stephen Gardner: "I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this. I want to make sure that if Tyler Robinson is, in fact, the person that jumped off that roof, that this handprint that they say they have, the screwdriver, the gun, the bullet, all of that matches up because Charlie Kirk deserves justice. And the American people deserve the truth." Jack Posobiec

INVESTIGATING CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION Stephen Gardner: "I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this. I want to make sure that if Tyler Robinson is, in fact, the person that jumped off that roof, that this handprint that they say they have, the screwdriver, the gun, the bullet, all of that matches up because Charlie Kirk deserves justice. And the American people deserve the truth." Jack Posobiec

Real America's Voice (RAV)

59,559 views • 9 months ago

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — “KILL SHOT” BULLET DOES NOT MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Everyone said something felt off. They were right. A new court filing claims the ATF couldn’t tie the fatal bullet to the rifle linked to Tyler Robinson. Read that again. • The bullet that killed Charlie Kirk… not matched to Tyler Robinson's rifle • The weapon they said was used… now in question • DNA on the evidence? Multiple contributors This was supposed to be airtight. Now it’s collapsing in real time. So if Tyler Robinson’s rifle didn’t fire the shot… then who, or what, actually did?

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — “KILL SHOT” BULLET DOES NOT MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Everyone said something felt off. They were right. A new court filing claims the ATF couldn’t tie the fatal bullet to the rifle linked to Tyler Robinson. Read that again. • The bullet that killed Charlie Kirk… not matched to Tyler Robinson's rifle • The weapon they said was used… now in question • DNA on the evidence? Multiple contributors This was supposed to be airtight. Now it’s collapsing in real time. So if Tyler Robinson’s rifle didn’t fire the shot… then who, or what, actually did?

HustleBitch

1,607,234 views • 3 months ago

We don't accept the fedjacketing from dipshits who jumped from conspiracy theory to conspiracy theory to arrive at the conclusion that Charlie Kirk is still alive (?) These idiots know nothing about ballistics and can't explain why Mossad would've planted the wrong gun.

We don't accept the fedjacketing from dipshits who jumped from conspiracy theory to conspiracy theory to arrive at the conclusion that Charlie Kirk is still alive (?) These idiots know nothing about ballistics and can't explain why Mossad would've planted the wrong gun.

1stclassclips

70,347 views • 7 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: New Forensic Filing PROVES The BULLET DOES NOT MATCH THE GUN Found At The Scene That Allegedly Belongs To Tyler Robinson🤯 The establishment’s "open and shut case" just completely collapsed. A new filing has just been made public regarding the ATF forensic testing in the Charlie Kirk assassination, and it is the ultimate proof that Tyler Robinson is nothing more than a government patsy. Here is the breaking evidence the mainstream media is trying to spin: THE BALLISTICS FAILED TO MATCH: According to the official court filings, the ATF tested the bullet jacket fragments recovered from Charlie Kirk’s neck during the autopsy. The result? The conventional toolmark analysis failed to link those fragments to the rifle found at the scene—the exact rifle the Feds claim belonged to Tyler Robinson. The results were officially "inconclusive," meaning there is zero forensic proof that the bullet that killed Charlie came from that gun. THE GOVERNMENT PANIC: Now that the initial forensics have failed to connect their hand-picked patsy to the murder weapon, the state is panicking. They are desperately trying to force a "re-testing" using different chemical methods because they know they have no case. Tyler’s defense is rightfully objecting to this, because the current results already do exactly what they are supposed to do: they exonerate him. THE FRAGMENTATION COVER-UP: They are trying to use the excuse of "bullet fragmentation" to explain away why there was no exit wound and why the ballistics don't match. But we know the truth. The Feds planted a weapon, pointed the finger at a terrified kid who was coerced into surrendering, and are now scrambling because the physical science doesn't back up their lies. Tyler Robinson did NOT shoot Charlie Kirk. This was a highly coordinated hit, and our own government is working overtime to protect the real assassins while railroading an innocent scapegoat. The entire official narrative is a lie. 🇺🇸⚓️

🚨 BREAKING: New Forensic Filing PROVES The BULLET DOES NOT MATCH THE GUN Found At The Scene That Allegedly Belongs To Tyler Robinson🤯 The establishment’s "open and shut case" just completely collapsed. A new filing has just been made public regarding the ATF forensic testing in the Charlie Kirk assassination, and it is the ultimate proof that Tyler Robinson is nothing more than a government patsy. Here is the breaking evidence the mainstream media is trying to spin: THE BALLISTICS FAILED TO MATCH: According to the official court filings, the ATF tested the bullet jacket fragments recovered from Charlie Kirk’s neck during the autopsy. The result? The conventional toolmark analysis failed to link those fragments to the rifle found at the scene—the exact rifle the Feds claim belonged to Tyler Robinson. The results were officially "inconclusive," meaning there is zero forensic proof that the bullet that killed Charlie came from that gun. THE GOVERNMENT PANIC: Now that the initial forensics have failed to connect their hand-picked patsy to the murder weapon, the state is panicking. They are desperately trying to force a "re-testing" using different chemical methods because they know they have no case. Tyler’s defense is rightfully objecting to this, because the current results already do exactly what they are supposed to do: they exonerate him. THE FRAGMENTATION COVER-UP: They are trying to use the excuse of "bullet fragmentation" to explain away why there was no exit wound and why the ballistics don't match. But we know the truth. The Feds planted a weapon, pointed the finger at a terrified kid who was coerced into surrendering, and are now scrambling because the physical science doesn't back up their lies. Tyler Robinson did NOT shoot Charlie Kirk. This was a highly coordinated hit, and our own government is working overtime to protect the real assassins while railroading an innocent scapegoat. The entire official narrative is a lie. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

101,579 views • 3 months ago

Tyler Robinson is innocent. Why isn't this video being analyzed? If we slow it down to super slow motion, the bullet should be visible. No video has shown the "magic bullet" because Charlie was killed by a bomb in his mic—that is something that can be seen in the footage.

Tyler Robinson is innocent. Why isn't this video being analyzed? If we slow it down to super slow motion, the bullet should be visible. No video has shown the "magic bullet" because Charlie was killed by a bomb in his mic—that is something that can be seen in the footage.

Irlandarra

249,110 views • 14 days ago