Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Former senior Biden administration official Philip Gordon says the same forces that pushed Trump toward the Iran MOU—what Drop Site’s Jeremy Scahill calls the “3 Ms”: markets, midterms, and depleted U.S. munitions—could ultimately force the US President back toward a “messy version of the MOU.” Gordon warns a renewed...

DropSiteNews's profile picture

Drop Site

472,219 subscribers

45,200 просмотров • 4 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

President Trump says he warned Iranian officials against keeping the Strait of Hormuz closed, saying, "You close it and you won't have a country. You won't even make it back to your country." Trump added that the United States could take control of the waterway if necessary, saying, "We may take over the Strait, if we have to. If they don't make a deal, we'll collect tolls." He also said the U.S. could become the "Guardian Angel" of the Strait and take 20% of the oil.
2:36

President Trump says he warned Iranian officials against keeping the Strait of Hormuz closed, saying, "You close it and you won't have a country. You won't even make it back to your country." Trump added that the United States could take control of the waterway if necessary, saying, "We may take over the Strait, if we have to. If they don't make a deal, we'll collect tolls." He also said the U.S. could become the "Guardian Angel" of the Strait and take 20% of the oil.

Breaking911

132,063 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“Well that’s really what Iran’s endgame has been—to basically hijack the global economy, meaning the soft underbelly of the U.S. war machine and that is the energy markets… This notion that the United States is simply going to traverse and open the Strait of Hormuz without a long lasting peace agreement here, I don’t buy that.” Former Foreign Policy Advisor to President Trump George Papadopoulos reacts to the U.S. and Iran returning to war-fighting—warning that Iran has the ability to lock down the Strait of Hormuz for the foreseeable future. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
2:32

“Well that’s really what Iran’s endgame has been—to basically hijack the global economy, meaning the soft underbelly of the U.S. war machine and that is the energy markets… This notion that the United States is simply going to traverse and open the Strait of Hormuz without a long lasting peace agreement here, I don’t buy that.” Former Foreign Policy Advisor to President Trump George Papadopoulos reacts to the U.S. and Iran returning to war-fighting—warning that Iran has the ability to lock down the Strait of Hormuz for the foreseeable future. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

28,636 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Professor Robert Pape says Trump has lost control of the Iran war and is now being dragged toward something almost nobody expected: U.S. troops seizing Iranian territory along the Strait of Hormuz. He thinks the Battle of Hormuz has begun, and his argument is that Trump is no longer choosing whether to escalate; the war itself is beginning to make those choices for him. For months, Prof. Pape has warned about what he calls the "escalation trap." America bombs Iran, they refuse to surrender, Washington increases the pressure, the bombing creates more anger and nationalism inside Iran, they retaliate, and America escalates again. Prof. Pape thinks America may be preparing for stage three of the escalation trap: Ground operations. Not an invasion of Tehran, but a limited seizure of strategic Iranian territory along the Strait of Hormuz to physically weaken Tehran's ability to control shipping. He says Iranian nationalism is already exploding after the killing of the Supreme Leader, members of his family, senior officials, and thousands of Iranians. Calls for revenge are growing that could inspire attacks against Americans around the world. Then imagine one of those attacks succeeds. Americans are killed, U.S. nationalism surges, and suddenly walking away from Iran isn't seen as ending a stupid war; it's seen as dishonouring dead Americans. That's why he doesn't think Trump can simply wake up tomorrow and decide he's had enough. He faces a political crisis if his own base decides Iran humiliated him. Trump may think he's escalating to reverse a defeat, but Prof. Pape thinks every escalation is removing another exit. And America may now be moving toward putting troops on Iranian soil in a war that neither Trump nor Iran will soon have the political power to stop. Robert A. Pape
57:12

Professor Robert Pape says Trump has lost control of the Iran war and is now being dragged toward something almost nobody expected: U.S. troops seizing Iranian territory along the Strait of Hormuz. He thinks the Battle of Hormuz has begun, and his argument is that Trump is no longer choosing whether to escalate; the war itself is beginning to make those choices for him. For months, Prof. Pape has warned about what he calls the "escalation trap." America bombs Iran, they refuse to surrender, Washington increases the pressure, the bombing creates more anger and nationalism inside Iran, they retaliate, and America escalates again. Prof. Pape thinks America may be preparing for stage three of the escalation trap: Ground operations. Not an invasion of Tehran, but a limited seizure of strategic Iranian territory along the Strait of Hormuz to physically weaken Tehran's ability to control shipping. He says Iranian nationalism is already exploding after the killing of the Supreme Leader, members of his family, senior officials, and thousands of Iranians. Calls for revenge are growing that could inspire attacks against Americans around the world. Then imagine one of those attacks succeeds. Americans are killed, U.S. nationalism surges, and suddenly walking away from Iran isn't seen as ending a stupid war; it's seen as dishonouring dead Americans. That's why he doesn't think Trump can simply wake up tomorrow and decide he's had enough. He faces a political crisis if his own base decides Iran humiliated him. Trump may think he's escalating to reverse a defeat, but Prof. Pape thinks every escalation is removing another exit. And America may now be moving toward putting troops on Iranian soil in a war that neither Trump nor Iran will soon have the political power to stop. Robert A. Pape

Mario Nawfal

469,370 просмотров • 10 дней назад

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 NO TURNING BACK: THE NUCLEAR RACE AND THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ The U.S. and its allies are now facing a "bad vs. worse" scenario where stopping the current conflict could trigger a sprint toward a nuclear device. With 460kg of highly enriched uranium already in play, the regime has left the West with zero risk-free options. Despite claims that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, Aimen Dean points out that Iran is actually exporting more oil than ever while fighting with an "Iraq-Iran war" mentality from the 1980s. The transition to AI and underwater drone technology has changed the game, but the escalation toward a "catalyst for collapse" remains fraught with danger. Aimen Dean
5:28

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 NO TURNING BACK: THE NUCLEAR RACE AND THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ The U.S. and its allies are now facing a "bad vs. worse" scenario where stopping the current conflict could trigger a sprint toward a nuclear device. With 460kg of highly enriched uranium already in play, the regime has left the West with zero risk-free options. Despite claims that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, Aimen Dean points out that Iran is actually exporting more oil than ever while fighting with an "Iraq-Iran war" mentality from the 1980s. The transition to AI and underwater drone technology has changed the game, but the escalation toward a "catalyst for collapse" remains fraught with danger. Aimen Dean

Mario Nawfal

101,215 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. munitions stockpile is so depleted, continuing the war may be physically impossible. Ret. Lt. Col. Daniel Davis breaks down what happens when Trump runs out of options. "There's no rational reason to think that the first 40 days of bombing, where you had a massive amount of stuff and you didn't force them to capitulate, that a smaller period of time is going to have the effect that the first one didn't." When the arsenal empties, the only cards left are surrender or nuclear escalation. Daniel Davis Deep Dive
4:46

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. munitions stockpile is so depleted, continuing the war may be physically impossible. Ret. Lt. Col. Daniel Davis breaks down what happens when Trump runs out of options. "There's no rational reason to think that the first 40 days of bombing, where you had a massive amount of stuff and you didn't force them to capitulate, that a smaller period of time is going to have the effect that the first one didn't." When the arsenal empties, the only cards left are surrender or nuclear escalation. Daniel Davis Deep Dive

Mario Nawfal

44,742 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump's team has given Iran until TOMORROW to publicly renounce attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz, and to state that the Strait is OPEN for travel There will be CONSEQUENCES if not, per Axios 🔥 Trump is playing hardball: He said the ceasefire is OVER, now Iran knows he's not just going to sit back and watch them violate EVERY commitment they make FOX: "The U.S. is now demanding that Iran make a public statement declaring the Strait of Hormuz is open and that ships crossing will no longer be attacked." "The U.S. hit roughly 170 targets in Iran this week, including rail bridges the U.S. says were used to transport weapons."
2:27

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump's team has given Iran until TOMORROW to publicly renounce attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz, and to state that the Strait is OPEN for travel There will be CONSEQUENCES if not, per Axios 🔥 Trump is playing hardball: He said the ceasefire is OVER, now Iran knows he's not just going to sit back and watch them violate EVERY commitment they make FOX: "The U.S. is now demanding that Iran make a public statement declaring the Strait of Hormuz is open and that ships crossing will no longer be attacked." "The U.S. hit roughly 170 targets in Iran this week, including rail bridges the U.S. says were used to transport weapons."

Eric Daugherty

530,255 просмотров • 13 дней назад

NEW: The U.S.-Iran deal is already having an impact far beyond the negotiating table. As President Trump formally marked the extension of the ceasefire, oil and gas prices continued falling amid expectations that global energy supplies could stabilize if the agreement holds. The memorandum launches a 60-day push toward a final deal, with provisions that include reopening key shipping routes, easing sanctions, access to frozen Iranian funds, and renewed negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. Trump says the clock is now ticking. If talks fail to produce the outcome his administration wants, he warned the U.S. could "go back to bombing." For now, markets are reacting to the prospect of a wider peace deal — and lower energy prices are one of the first visible results. Trey Yingst
2:08

NEW: The U.S.-Iran deal is already having an impact far beyond the negotiating table. As President Trump formally marked the extension of the ceasefire, oil and gas prices continued falling amid expectations that global energy supplies could stabilize if the agreement holds. The memorandum launches a 60-day push toward a final deal, with provisions that include reopening key shipping routes, easing sanctions, access to frozen Iranian funds, and renewed negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. Trump says the clock is now ticking. If talks fail to produce the outcome his administration wants, he warned the U.S. could "go back to bombing." For now, markets are reacting to the prospect of a wider peace deal — and lower energy prices are one of the first visible results. Trey Yingst

Fox News

396,612 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🎥 Top Iranian analyst Hassan Ahmadian حسن احمدیان spoke with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill to break down how US President Trump, after failing militarily, grew desperate for a diplomatic exit — and ended up capitulating to the very framework Iran had been pushing all along. Ahmadian says a deal covering two core Iranian demands was within reach. It included an end to the war, including Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, and the unfreezing of Iranian assets and lifting of the oil embargo. In return, the U.S. was promised freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. But Trump tried to revise the agreed framework after it had already been finalized with mediators, pushing Iran to walk away from direct talks entirely. When the U.S. escalated militarily, Iran struck back harder. “The Iranians not only didn’t respond to President Trump — they actually showed that they are willing to engage in another war if need be and not succumb to what he was demanding.” That’s when Trump realized he couldn’t turn a military failure into a diplomatic win, and ultimately capitulated, Ahmadian told Drop Site. 🔗 Watch the full interview on Drop Sites’ YouTube channel
8:00

🎥 Top Iranian analyst Hassan Ahmadian حسن احمدیان spoke with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill to break down how US President Trump, after failing militarily, grew desperate for a diplomatic exit — and ended up capitulating to the very framework Iran had been pushing all along. Ahmadian says a deal covering two core Iranian demands was within reach. It included an end to the war, including Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, and the unfreezing of Iranian assets and lifting of the oil embargo. In return, the U.S. was promised freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. But Trump tried to revise the agreed framework after it had already been finalized with mediators, pushing Iran to walk away from direct talks entirely. When the U.S. escalated militarily, Iran struck back harder. “The Iranians not only didn’t respond to President Trump — they actually showed that they are willing to engage in another war if need be and not succumb to what he was demanding.” That’s when Trump realized he couldn’t turn a military failure into a diplomatic win, and ultimately capitulated, Ahmadian told Drop Site. 🔗 Watch the full interview on Drop Sites’ YouTube channel

Drop Site

28,802 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🎥 Top Iranian analyst Hassan Ahmadian حسن احمدیان spoke with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill to break down how US President Trump, after failing militarily, grew desperate for a diplomatic exit — and ended up capitulating to the very framework Iran had been pushing all along. Ahmadian says a deal covering two core Iranian demands was within reach. It included an end to the war, including Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, and the unfreezing of Iranian assets and lifting of the oil embargo. In return, the U.S. was promised freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. But Trump tried to revise the agreed framework after it had already been finalized with mediators, pushing Iran to walk away from direct talks entirely. When the U.S. escalated militarily, Iran struck back harder. “The Iranians not only didn’t respond to President Trump — they actually showed that they are willing to engage in another war if need be and not succumb to what he was demanding.” That’s when Trump realized he couldn’t turn a military failure into a diplomatic win and ultimately capitulated. 🔗 Watch the full interview on Drop Sites’ YouTube channel
2:54

🎥 Top Iranian analyst Hassan Ahmadian حسن احمدیان spoke with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill to break down how US President Trump, after failing militarily, grew desperate for a diplomatic exit — and ended up capitulating to the very framework Iran had been pushing all along. Ahmadian says a deal covering two core Iranian demands was within reach. It included an end to the war, including Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, and the unfreezing of Iranian assets and lifting of the oil embargo. In return, the U.S. was promised freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. But Trump tried to revise the agreed framework after it had already been finalized with mediators, pushing Iran to walk away from direct talks entirely. When the U.S. escalated militarily, Iran struck back harder. “The Iranians not only didn’t respond to President Trump — they actually showed that they are willing to engage in another war if need be and not succumb to what he was demanding.” That’s when Trump realized he couldn’t turn a military failure into a diplomatic win and ultimately capitulated. 🔗 Watch the full interview on Drop Sites’ YouTube channel

Drop Site

13,610 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Famous American political scientist Professor John Mearsheimer on the US Navy's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz that started this evening: This is not only ineffective — it's counterproductive. The idea that Iran will just surrender and capitulate is not a serious argument. Why did we allow Iranian oil to return to global markets? Because we need it. We lifted the sanctions because without Iranian oil, the global economy could have collapsed. If the Houthis and Iranians close the Red Sea, you'll lose not only oil from the Persian Gulf — you'll also lose trade through the Red Sea. This will deal a blow to the global economy. And that's what could ultimately force the Trump administration to give in.
1:41

Famous American political scientist Professor John Mearsheimer on the US Navy's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz that started this evening: This is not only ineffective — it's counterproductive. The idea that Iran will just surrender and capitulate is not a serious argument. Why did we allow Iranian oil to return to global markets? Because we need it. We lifted the sanctions because without Iranian oil, the global economy could have collapsed. If the Houthis and Iranians close the Red Sea, you'll lose not only oil from the Persian Gulf — you'll also lose trade through the Red Sea. This will deal a blow to the global economy. And that's what could ultimately force the Trump administration to give in.

Sprinter Press Agency- SPA

16,083 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I hope that we will not see a major escalation of the war in the Middle East through direct U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. President Trump has repeatedly said he wants to be a president of peace — and so far, he’s been one of the very few American presidents in recent history not to start a war. He has also shown deep skepticism toward the so-called U.S. deep state and has made a serious effort to shield himself from its influence. But if he chooses to enter a new war, he will inevitably open the doors of the Oval Office to it — for many hours every day. That would mark a turning point of his presidency.
1:02

I hope that we will not see a major escalation of the war in the Middle East through direct U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. President Trump has repeatedly said he wants to be a president of peace — and so far, he’s been one of the very few American presidents in recent history not to start a war. He has also shown deep skepticism toward the so-called U.S. deep state and has made a serious effort to shield himself from its influence. But if he chooses to enter a new war, he will inevitably open the doors of the Oval Office to it — for many hours every day. That would mark a turning point of his presidency.

Vuk Jeremić

24,716 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The nuclear standoff is a smokescreen. This war is about the future of the Middle East and AI, and the blockade in the Strait of Hormuz means someone's hand will be forced before long. Nima Rostami Alkhorshid believes we may be only days away from seeing the war become kinetic again. "Donald Trump is trying to say that it's all about the Iranian nuclear program, but it's not. The reality is the Strait of Hormuz right now." China won't bail Trump out, Iran won't back down, and the New York Times says U.S. special forces could be extracting enriched uranium as early as next week.
13:49

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The nuclear standoff is a smokescreen. This war is about the future of the Middle East and AI, and the blockade in the Strait of Hormuz means someone's hand will be forced before long. Nima Rostami Alkhorshid believes we may be only days away from seeing the war become kinetic again. "Donald Trump is trying to say that it's all about the Iranian nuclear program, but it's not. The reality is the Strait of Hormuz right now." China won't bail Trump out, Iran won't back down, and the New York Times says U.S. special forces could be extracting enriched uranium as early as next week.

Mario Nawfal

54,675 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 First reactions to Trump’s Iran war address: “this isn’t ending anytime soon” After Trump claimed the war was close to being wrapped up, the immediate reaction was the opposite. Analysts said the speech didn’t sound like de-escalation at all. Instead of a clear plan to end the war, they heard signals of further escalation, with threats to hit Iran harder and no real timeline for when it ends. No concrete diplomatic offer to Iran, no clear vision of what a post-war relationship would look like, and surprisingly, less urgency around securing Iran’s nuclear material, which had originally been the main objective. At the same time, Trump called on allies to step in and secure key routes like the Strait of Hormuz, but there’s skepticism they’ll actually do it, especially given how complex that mission is and current tensions with NATO partners. Meanwhile, on the ground, the situation is already escalating. Iran has reportedly launched new drone and missile attacks across the region, including toward Gulf countries, while energy flows and revenues are being hit hard, pushing parts of the region toward a serious economic crisis. Trump said the war is close to ending, but the first reactions suggest the opposite, with more escalation, more uncertainty, and no clear path out. Source: CNN
8:30

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 First reactions to Trump’s Iran war address: “this isn’t ending anytime soon” After Trump claimed the war was close to being wrapped up, the immediate reaction was the opposite. Analysts said the speech didn’t sound like de-escalation at all. Instead of a clear plan to end the war, they heard signals of further escalation, with threats to hit Iran harder and no real timeline for when it ends. No concrete diplomatic offer to Iran, no clear vision of what a post-war relationship would look like, and surprisingly, less urgency around securing Iran’s nuclear material, which had originally been the main objective. At the same time, Trump called on allies to step in and secure key routes like the Strait of Hormuz, but there’s skepticism they’ll actually do it, especially given how complex that mission is and current tensions with NATO partners. Meanwhile, on the ground, the situation is already escalating. Iran has reportedly launched new drone and missile attacks across the region, including toward Gulf countries, while energy flows and revenues are being hit hard, pushing parts of the region toward a serious economic crisis. Trump said the war is close to ending, but the first reactions suggest the opposite, with more escalation, more uncertainty, and no clear path out. Source: CNN

Mario Nawfal

76,007 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Falling oil prices may be tempting Trump to squeeze Iran harder, but Tehran isn't budging. Alexander Christoforou breaks down a situation that's still genuinely messy. Mixed signals are pouring out of both Washington and Tehran, a power struggle over the Strait of Hormuz is grinding on, and low-level attacks keep flaring even with the MOU supposedly in place. The drop in oil prices, he says, may be emboldening the Trump administration to crank up the pressure. Iran, meanwhile, is holding firm on every red line it drew at the start of the war. And it all keeps circling back to Lebanon. Until that front gets resolved, Christoforou argues, the broader regional puzzle stays unsolved. The bigger point? He says Trump already has every tool needed to force a Lebanon ceasefire, if he actually wants the deal. Alex Christoforou
2:33

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Falling oil prices may be tempting Trump to squeeze Iran harder, but Tehran isn't budging. Alexander Christoforou breaks down a situation that's still genuinely messy. Mixed signals are pouring out of both Washington and Tehran, a power struggle over the Strait of Hormuz is grinding on, and low-level attacks keep flaring even with the MOU supposedly in place. The drop in oil prices, he says, may be emboldening the Trump administration to crank up the pressure. Iran, meanwhile, is holding firm on every red line it drew at the start of the war. And it all keeps circling back to Lebanon. Until that front gets resolved, Christoforou argues, the broader regional puzzle stays unsolved. The bigger point? He says Trump already has every tool needed to force a Lebanon ceasefire, if he actually wants the deal. Alex Christoforou

Mario Nawfal

39,853 просмотров • 28 дней назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 If the U.S-Iran war has lost the support of Kagan, it means it could be toast Robert Kagan spent decades arguing that American military power could shape the world. He was one of the intellectual architects of the neoconservative movement, a co-founder of the Project for the New American Century, and one of the loudest advocates for the kind of interventionism that defined the Iraq War era. So when someone like Kagan starts warning that the United States may be heading toward irreversible defeat in Iran, people should pay attention. Not because he suddenly became anti-war, but because figures like Kagan were always the ones insisting America could escalate its way out of any geopolitical crisis. That confidence now seems badly shaken. In The Atlantic, Kagan argued that the damage from the Iran conflict may already be beyond repair. He warned there would be “no return to the status quo ante” and no eventual American triumph is capable of undoing the consequences of the war. That is an extraordinary admission coming from someone who spent years promoting the idea that American power, properly used, could reorder entire regions. What Kagan seems to recognize now is that this conflict may have exposed limits the U.S cannot easily overcome. His focus is the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran’s leverage over global energy flows has fundamentally altered the balance of power in the Gulf. Kagan’s argument is not simply that the war is going badly. It is that the U.S may no longer possess the political will, military flexibility, or international credibility needed to reverse the situation without launching a catastrophic full-scale invasion that neither Trump nor the American public appears willing to support. That is the key shift. Kagan now sounds like someone confronting the possibility that escalation itself may have weakened American influence rather than restored it. He openly warns that the war could strengthen China and Russia, fracture alliances, undermine trust in U.S. leadership, and push Gulf states to reconsider their dependence on Washington altogether. In other words, the interventionist doctrine he helped champion may now be producing the exact opposite of what it promised.
7:52

🇮🇷🇺🇸 If the U.S-Iran war has lost the support of Kagan, it means it could be toast Robert Kagan spent decades arguing that American military power could shape the world. He was one of the intellectual architects of the neoconservative movement, a co-founder of the Project for the New American Century, and one of the loudest advocates for the kind of interventionism that defined the Iraq War era. So when someone like Kagan starts warning that the United States may be heading toward irreversible defeat in Iran, people should pay attention. Not because he suddenly became anti-war, but because figures like Kagan were always the ones insisting America could escalate its way out of any geopolitical crisis. That confidence now seems badly shaken. In The Atlantic, Kagan argued that the damage from the Iran conflict may already be beyond repair. He warned there would be “no return to the status quo ante” and no eventual American triumph is capable of undoing the consequences of the war. That is an extraordinary admission coming from someone who spent years promoting the idea that American power, properly used, could reorder entire regions. What Kagan seems to recognize now is that this conflict may have exposed limits the U.S cannot easily overcome. His focus is the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran’s leverage over global energy flows has fundamentally altered the balance of power in the Gulf. Kagan’s argument is not simply that the war is going badly. It is that the U.S may no longer possess the political will, military flexibility, or international credibility needed to reverse the situation without launching a catastrophic full-scale invasion that neither Trump nor the American public appears willing to support. That is the key shift. Kagan now sounds like someone confronting the possibility that escalation itself may have weakened American influence rather than restored it. He openly warns that the war could strengthen China and Russia, fracture alliances, undermine trust in U.S. leadership, and push Gulf states to reconsider their dependence on Washington altogether. In other words, the interventionist doctrine he helped champion may now be producing the exact opposite of what it promised.

Mario Nawfal

71,355 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 STRAIT OF HORMUZ STANDOFF COULD TRIGGER GLOBAL SHIPPING CRISIS Analyst Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY is warning the situation around the Strait of Hormuz is far more serious than many realize. According to Yon, major shipping companies are already staying out of the waterway - not necessarily because it’s physically closed, but because insurance markets are refusing to cover ships entering the conflict zone. “Nobody big is going through right now,” Yon said, pointing to major players like Maersk avoiding the route entirely. That matters because the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world, carrying a massive share of global oil shipments. Yon also warned that if tensions escalate and U.S. warships attempt to force passage, they could face direct attacks. “The ships could take fire… they could be sunk,” he said. His broader warning: if shipping through the strait collapses, it could trigger a cascading global economic shock affecting energy, shipping, and supply chains.
4:27

🚨 STRAIT OF HORMUZ STANDOFF COULD TRIGGER GLOBAL SHIPPING CRISIS Analyst Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY is warning the situation around the Strait of Hormuz is far more serious than many realize. According to Yon, major shipping companies are already staying out of the waterway - not necessarily because it’s physically closed, but because insurance markets are refusing to cover ships entering the conflict zone. “Nobody big is going through right now,” Yon said, pointing to major players like Maersk avoiding the route entirely. That matters because the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world, carrying a massive share of global oil shipments. Yon also warned that if tensions escalate and U.S. warships attempt to force passage, they could face direct attacks. “The ships could take fire… they could be sunk,” he said. His broader warning: if shipping through the strait collapses, it could trigger a cascading global economic shock affecting energy, shipping, and supply chains.

LindellTV

13,551 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

⭕️ Trump says U.S. military action is keeping the Strait of Hormuz open as fighting with Iran escalates. “It’s open. We bombed the hell out of them last night,” Trump said Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press. “They’re very, very evil and sick people. We had meetings with them. They agreed to a deal yesterday, a perfect deal for us. No nuclear, no this, no that, no nothing. They gave up everything. And then after that, they left the room. And then within an hour, they launched a drone at a ship.” The U.S.-led Joint Maritime Information Center said commercial traffic is moving through the strait at “reduced levels”. The White House has not released additional details about an agreement Trump referenced. However, reporting by Drop Site News, along with statements from Iran’s foreign minister, provides additional information about the negotiations. An Iranian official told Jeremy Scahill it was a deliberate misinformation campaign to pressure Oman.
0:55

⭕️ Trump says U.S. military action is keeping the Strait of Hormuz open as fighting with Iran escalates. “It’s open. We bombed the hell out of them last night,” Trump said Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press. “They’re very, very evil and sick people. We had meetings with them. They agreed to a deal yesterday, a perfect deal for us. No nuclear, no this, no that, no nothing. They gave up everything. And then after that, they left the room. And then within an hour, they launched a drone at a ship.” The U.S.-led Joint Maritime Information Center said commercial traffic is moving through the strait at “reduced levels”. The White House has not released additional details about an agreement Trump referenced. However, reporting by Drop Site News, along with statements from Iran’s foreign minister, provides additional information about the negotiations. An Iranian official told Jeremy Scahill it was a deliberate misinformation campaign to pressure Oman.

Drop Site

56,698 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Donald Trump claimed today that “a massive Armada is heading to Iran,” warning that the US is “ready, willing, and able to rapidly fulfill its mission, with speed and violence, if necessary.” On the Drop Site News livestream, jeremy scahill noted that Iran is signalling a shift in its rules of engagement. Iranian officials are indicating that the traditional policy of calibrated retaliation may change if the U.S. or Israel target Iran’s top leadership. Scahill noted that discussions inside Iran’s national security circles reportedly include the possibility of larger-scale retaliation against U.S. forces if Iran is attacked again. He also cut through the political rhetoric in Washington: This is not about “supporting the Iranian people,” Scahill said. “This is about U.S. imperial aims. It’s about oil. It’s about gas. It’s about geopolitical war.” From the 1953 CIA-backed coup and support for the Shah, to decades of sanctions that have devastated ordinary Iranians, to June’s 12-day U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign that killed more than 1,000 people, Scahill argued that U.S. policy toward Iran has consistently been about imperial aims — not democracy.
5:27

Donald Trump claimed today that “a massive Armada is heading to Iran,” warning that the US is “ready, willing, and able to rapidly fulfill its mission, with speed and violence, if necessary.” On the Drop Site News livestream, jeremy scahill noted that Iran is signalling a shift in its rules of engagement. Iranian officials are indicating that the traditional policy of calibrated retaliation may change if the U.S. or Israel target Iran’s top leadership. Scahill noted that discussions inside Iran’s national security circles reportedly include the possibility of larger-scale retaliation against U.S. forces if Iran is attacked again. He also cut through the political rhetoric in Washington: This is not about “supporting the Iranian people,” Scahill said. “This is about U.S. imperial aims. It’s about oil. It’s about gas. It’s about geopolitical war.” From the 1953 CIA-backed coup and support for the Shah, to decades of sanctions that have devastated ordinary Iranians, to June’s 12-day U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign that killed more than 1,000 people, Scahill argued that U.S. policy toward Iran has consistently been about imperial aims — not democracy.

Drop Site

34,718 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 TRUMP FELL FOR NETANYAHU'S PITCH FOR ATTACKING IRAN Professor Foad Izadi talked about how Trump chose to dismiss his own intelligence community’s assessment that Iran has no nuclear weapons program in favor of Netanyahu's narrative. Foad emphasized the failure to predict the closure of the Strait of Hormuz was a symptom of the same, with Iran embarrassing Trump on the military front hours after he suggested they could do nothing to the U.S. Air Force. Professor Izadi stressed that ignoring expert data has led to a much more prolonged and dangerous conflict. "He thought the war would be finished in 3 days. Even the intelligence community told him about the consequences." فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi
4:01

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 TRUMP FELL FOR NETANYAHU'S PITCH FOR ATTACKING IRAN Professor Foad Izadi talked about how Trump chose to dismiss his own intelligence community’s assessment that Iran has no nuclear weapons program in favor of Netanyahu's narrative. Foad emphasized the failure to predict the closure of the Strait of Hormuz was a symptom of the same, with Iran embarrassing Trump on the military front hours after he suggested they could do nothing to the U.S. Air Force. Professor Izadi stressed that ignoring expert data has led to a much more prolonged and dangerous conflict. "He thought the war would be finished in 3 days. Even the intelligence community told him about the consequences." فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi

Mario Nawfal

33,826 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Donald Trump warned Iran it will be hit “extremely hard” in the coming weeks, saying the US could bring it “back to the stone ages where they belong.” He said the US is now “totally independent of the Middle East,” adding that it does not need the region’s oil or resources, but is there to help its “allies.” The speech quickly rattled global markets, with oil prices rising and investors reacting to fears of a widening conflict and potential disruption to key supply routes. The remarks have added to growing global concern over escalation, with uncertainty building around how far tensions could go and what it could mean for energy supply and economic stability.
0:24

Donald Trump warned Iran it will be hit “extremely hard” in the coming weeks, saying the US could bring it “back to the stone ages where they belong.” He said the US is now “totally independent of the Middle East,” adding that it does not need the region’s oil or resources, but is there to help its “allies.” The speech quickly rattled global markets, with oil prices rising and investors reacting to fears of a widening conflict and potential disruption to key supply routes. The remarks have added to growing global concern over escalation, with uncertainty building around how far tensions could go and what it could mean for energy supply and economic stability.

Middle East Eye

137,397 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад