Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Found It! What's Next? ProSauce Finder | Names " Peyton Preslee And Mandy Muse {#psfinderreborn #saucefinder #prosaucefinder #finds #sauce #source #nsfw #thick #threesome #hiddengems} Video (

PSFinderReborn's profile picture

PSFinder Reborn

28,985 subscribers

53,933 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#psfinderreborn#saucefinder#prosaucefinder#finds#sauce#source#nsfw#thick#threesome#hiddengems
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

URGENT PSA - New supply chain attack vector that I found WILD > AI LLMs hallucinate package names roughly 18-21% of the time. Hackers have started pre-registering those hallucinated names on PyPI and npm with malicious payloads; they call it "slopsquatting" You can only imagine what's next
1:21

URGENT PSA - New supply chain attack vector that I found WILD > AI LLMs hallucinate package names roughly 18-21% of the time. Hackers have started pre-registering those hallucinated names on PyPI and npm with malicious payloads; they call it "slopsquatting" You can only imagine what's next

Basel Ismail

575,784 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I built an SEO consultant inside Claude Code. Old way: you hire a consultant. They pull data from Ahrefs, manually cluster keywords, build your site map. Takes weeks. Costs thousands. New way: Claude connects to the same tools (dataforseo or Ahrefs MCP), interviews you, finds actual competitors, builds your entire site map in 30 minutes. $3 in API calls via Ahrefs MCP or Data for SEO. Ran it on a local plumber site. It asked: local or commercial? When I said local residential, it filtered out commercial HVAC keywords before generating anything. Found 47 real competitors. Mapped 900+ pages. Delivered the full architecture. What's really cool is this system thinks like a consultant. It uses the same professional tools. It also adapts in real time and adjusts the methodology based on the data it finds. I've done SEO for 15 years. First time I've seen a tool act like it understands the business instead of just processing data. 👇 Video below for the full breakdown Comment Topical Map to make a puppy happy 🐾.
7:29

I built an SEO consultant inside Claude Code. Old way: you hire a consultant. They pull data from Ahrefs, manually cluster keywords, build your site map. Takes weeks. Costs thousands. New way: Claude connects to the same tools (dataforseo or Ahrefs MCP), interviews you, finds actual competitors, builds your entire site map in 30 minutes. $3 in API calls via Ahrefs MCP or Data for SEO. Ran it on a local plumber site. It asked: local or commercial? When I said local residential, it filtered out commercial HVAC keywords before generating anything. Found 47 real competitors. Mapped 900+ pages. Delivered the full architecture. What's really cool is this system thinks like a consultant. It uses the same professional tools. It also adapts in real time and adjusts the methodology based on the data it finds. I've done SEO for 15 years. First time I've seen a tool act like it understands the business instead of just processing data. 👇 Video below for the full breakdown Comment Topical Map to make a puppy happy 🐾.

Gael Breton

35,639 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

ALERT: UK child killer attacked and killed by inmates after being stabbed more than 30 times in an almost 5-minute prison attack. Kyle Bevan, 33, was serving a life sentence for the murder of his 2-year-old stepdaughter, Lola James, after she suffered “catastrophic brain damage.” Mark Fellows, 45, David Taylor, 64, and Lee Newell, 57, are on trial for Bevan's murder after they were seen on surveillance video leaving Bevan's cell after about 5 minutes, looking “satisfied,” according to the BBC. The attackers then placed Bevan in the bed inside his cell, where he bled out, and guards found him the next morning. Prosecutor Jason Pitter said to jurors, “He was stabbed and injured over 30 times, with at least one and probably more than one weapon… Four minutes and 39 seconds, that is how long it took. They left as if nothing had happened.” Prison guards found a folded piece of metal stashed behind a TV that had Bevans blood on it and a weapon in Taylor's cell, stashed inside a chili sauce bottle.
1:30

ALERT: UK child killer attacked and killed by inmates after being stabbed more than 30 times in an almost 5-minute prison attack. Kyle Bevan, 33, was serving a life sentence for the murder of his 2-year-old stepdaughter, Lola James, after she suffered “catastrophic brain damage.” Mark Fellows, 45, David Taylor, 64, and Lee Newell, 57, are on trial for Bevan's murder after they were seen on surveillance video leaving Bevan's cell after about 5 minutes, looking “satisfied,” according to the BBC. The attackers then placed Bevan in the bed inside his cell, where he bled out, and guards found him the next morning. Prosecutor Jason Pitter said to jurors, “He was stabbed and injured over 30 times, with at least one and probably more than one weapon… Four minutes and 39 seconds, that is how long it took. They left as if nothing had happened.” Prison guards found a folded piece of metal stashed behind a TV that had Bevans blood on it and a weapon in Taylor's cell, stashed inside a chili sauce bottle.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

891,944 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

SOMEONE FROM THE ANTHROPIC TEAM LEAKED THEIR OBSIDIAN SETUP. 8 MILLION PEOPLE SAW HOW HE ACTUALLY USES CLAUDE the funniest part? all of this information was sitting in claude's documentation from day one. nobody read it one guy did, packed it into a 9-step guide and posted it. and it broke the internet. 4,100 likes, 800 retweets, then china picked it up and 8 million views want to know what's in it? one file. called CLAUDE.md. it holds everything about you: how you think, what you're working on, where you get stuck, even how you want the ai to talk to you. claude reads it first every single session one file changed everything. because now ai doesn't open with "how can i help?" it already knows. it remembers your projects, sees your goals, catches moments where you're contradicting yourself people spent years searching for the perfect prompt. the right temperature. the magic formula. and the answer turned out to be not how you ask ai. but what ai knows about you before you even open your mouth then the guy went deeper. taught claude to work on a schedule. every morning at 7am the ai walks through all notes on its own, finds new stuff, links it, cleans what's stale. no command. no reminder and all of this runs on obsidian. free app. text files on your drive. no cloud, no lock-in. switch models tomorrow and the folder keeps working the most liked comment under the original post: "this is the difference between using ai and building a system. most people won't realize it until they waste hundreds of hours repeating themselves" hundreds of hours. you've already spent some of them full guide in the video. i break down finds like this every day - follow so you don't miss the next one
1:43

SOMEONE FROM THE ANTHROPIC TEAM LEAKED THEIR OBSIDIAN SETUP. 8 MILLION PEOPLE SAW HOW HE ACTUALLY USES CLAUDE the funniest part? all of this information was sitting in claude's documentation from day one. nobody read it one guy did, packed it into a 9-step guide and posted it. and it broke the internet. 4,100 likes, 800 retweets, then china picked it up and 8 million views want to know what's in it? one file. called CLAUDE.md. it holds everything about you: how you think, what you're working on, where you get stuck, even how you want the ai to talk to you. claude reads it first every single session one file changed everything. because now ai doesn't open with "how can i help?" it already knows. it remembers your projects, sees your goals, catches moments where you're contradicting yourself people spent years searching for the perfect prompt. the right temperature. the magic formula. and the answer turned out to be not how you ask ai. but what ai knows about you before you even open your mouth then the guy went deeper. taught claude to work on a schedule. every morning at 7am the ai walks through all notes on its own, finds new stuff, links it, cleans what's stale. no command. no reminder and all of this runs on obsidian. free app. text files on your drive. no cloud, no lock-in. switch models tomorrow and the folder keeps working the most liked comment under the original post: "this is the difference between using ai and building a system. most people won't realize it until they waste hundreds of hours repeating themselves" hundreds of hours. you've already spent some of them full guide in the video. i break down finds like this every day - follow so you don't miss the next one

kai

174,650 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

this cowork agent knows which ads will print money 😱 here's the system that knows what meta doesn't: step 1: pull the raw data → pulls Meta ads, GA4 + your source of truth (ie HubSpot, Calendly or a csv) → assumes broken UTMs, disconnected tools, no data eng step 2: map ads by angle → agent re-groups every ad by MESSAGE family (teardown, save-time, founder-led, etc.) → your best message is usually scattered across 3 campaigns + 2 audiences. meta can't see that. → now you can answer the only thing that matters: which angle is producing $ step 3: score buyers not clicks → not CTR. not CPL. not ROAS. → bookings. signups. revenue. whatever moves YOUR business. → 4 questions every day: what's real, what's fake, what's leaking, what's underfed step 4: the 4 outcome truths → REAL WINNER: strong clicks + strong buyers = scale → FAKE WINNER: strong clicks + garbage buyers = cut. no hesitation. → LEAK: good ad + broken page = rebuild page → UNDERFED: quiet crusher at 9% of budget = feed it step 5: find what's breaking → tells you exactly where it breaks: ad, page, or follow-through → last week it caught a founder-psychology ad landing on a generic SaaS page converting 34% below account average → not "something's off." but specific. actionable. step 6: 1 minute brief → 60 seconds brief. lands in cowork/telegram → every rec ships with a confidence tag. low data = no rec step 7: memory that compounds → week 1 finds the obvious fake winners → week 4 it pre-flags curiosity hooks before they become the next fake winner → every cycle is smarter than the last input: meta account + GA4 + one outcome source output: real winners. fake winners. leaks. what to do next. the old way: → triple whale: $300/mo → northbeam: $500/mo → hyros: $500/mo → data analyst: $8K/mo = $9,300/mo of "it depends" this: $0 I packaged the entire system as the Outcome Kit. 3 claude cowork agents + 12 skills: - data reader (meta + GA4 + outcomes. source truth only) - diagnostician (angle mapping + 4 outcome truths scoring) - brief writer (concrete moves + pattern memory) also works with OpenClaw🦞 and hermes (Nous Research). giving it away free. comment MONEY + like + follow (must follow so i can DM)
0:41

this cowork agent knows which ads will print money 😱 here's the system that knows what meta doesn't: step 1: pull the raw data → pulls Meta ads, GA4 + your source of truth (ie HubSpot, Calendly or a csv) → assumes broken UTMs, disconnected tools, no data eng step 2: map ads by angle → agent re-groups every ad by MESSAGE family (teardown, save-time, founder-led, etc.) → your best message is usually scattered across 3 campaigns + 2 audiences. meta can't see that. → now you can answer the only thing that matters: which angle is producing $ step 3: score buyers not clicks → not CTR. not CPL. not ROAS. → bookings. signups. revenue. whatever moves YOUR business. → 4 questions every day: what's real, what's fake, what's leaking, what's underfed step 4: the 4 outcome truths → REAL WINNER: strong clicks + strong buyers = scale → FAKE WINNER: strong clicks + garbage buyers = cut. no hesitation. → LEAK: good ad + broken page = rebuild page → UNDERFED: quiet crusher at 9% of budget = feed it step 5: find what's breaking → tells you exactly where it breaks: ad, page, or follow-through → last week it caught a founder-psychology ad landing on a generic SaaS page converting 34% below account average → not "something's off." but specific. actionable. step 6: 1 minute brief → 60 seconds brief. lands in cowork/telegram → every rec ships with a confidence tag. low data = no rec step 7: memory that compounds → week 1 finds the obvious fake winners → week 4 it pre-flags curiosity hooks before they become the next fake winner → every cycle is smarter than the last input: meta account + GA4 + one outcome source output: real winners. fake winners. leaks. what to do next. the old way: → triple whale: $300/mo → northbeam: $500/mo → hyros: $500/mo → data analyst: $8K/mo = $9,300/mo of "it depends" this: $0 I packaged the entire system as the Outcome Kit. 3 claude cowork agents + 12 skills: - data reader (meta + GA4 + outcomes. source truth only) - diagnostician (angle mapping + 4 outcome truths scoring) - brief writer (concrete moves + pattern memory) also works with OpenClaw🦞 and hermes (Nous Research). giving it away free. comment MONEY + like + follow (must follow so i can DM)

Matthew Berman

34,181 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

KASH PATEL'S CHARLIE KIRK NARRATIVE SLIP-UP: THE CASE OF THE FORGOTTEN SCREWDRIVER On September 15th, Kash Patel clearly told us the FBI spared no resource in investigating the scene of the crime, and definitively asserted that Tyler Robinson's DNA was found on BOTH a screwdriver found at the scene & on the recovered rifle. In fact, he made the claim Twice in this segment. Just one problem: In Tyler Robinson's indictment the very next day, September 16th, it lists ONLY the DNA on the gun and says nothing whatsoever about any screwdriver at all. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Nada. (I've put all the receipts in the video below) What's going on with this important narrative inconsistency? Am I an "anarchist" for asking these follow-ups, Mr. FBI Director?
2:41

KASH PATEL'S CHARLIE KIRK NARRATIVE SLIP-UP: THE CASE OF THE FORGOTTEN SCREWDRIVER On September 15th, Kash Patel clearly told us the FBI spared no resource in investigating the scene of the crime, and definitively asserted that Tyler Robinson's DNA was found on BOTH a screwdriver found at the scene & on the recovered rifle. In fact, he made the claim Twice in this segment. Just one problem: In Tyler Robinson's indictment the very next day, September 16th, it lists ONLY the DNA on the gun and says nothing whatsoever about any screwdriver at all. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Nada. (I've put all the receipts in the video below) What's going on with this important narrative inconsistency? Am I an "anarchist" for asking these follow-ups, Mr. FBI Director?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

200,074 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

ELON MUSK: DON’T TAKE ANYONE’S OPINION….GO TO THE SOURCE MATERIAL AND COMMUNITY NOTES TO SEE WHAT REALLY HAPPENED As soon as any company steps out of line and is willing to actually have the truth debated on their platform, it forces the other platforms to allow things to be more truthful, to not censor. Because their censorship becomes glaringly obvious And, you know, the best thing I found as a rebuttal, like if somebody, if there's a hoax, is just go to the source material. You know, if you think if somebody thinks, you know, it's, you know, Trump said that we should put Liz Cheney in a firing squad, I'm like, let me send you a link to X so you can watch his video. That's the best way. Don't take my opinion for it. Don't take anyone's opinion for it. Go to the source material and Community Notes Yes, and Community Notes is awesome. It's incredible because everybody gets checked, including me. And with Community Notes, all the software is open source, and all the data is open source, so you can recreate any given note independently. That's amazing. Yeah. That's how it should be. Total absolute transparency in every way Sometimes I get asked like, 'Elon, can you remove a note?' You know, mostly by the left, but sometimes by the right. I'm like, I don't even remove notes on my own account. Nothing. And, and by the way, everything is totally open. So if I did that, it would stick out like a sore thumb immediately. Like it's not going to be subtle That is the best counter to misinformation. Yes, absolutely. Like let everybody look at it and say, 'Okay, here's what the actual facts say.' Yes, exactly. The counter to misinformation is better information Not just that, but having it checked in real-time by the community. So you have millions of people that can go over it and debate whether or not this is true or that's true. Yes, and, and like I said, the best way to understand the truth of things is don't take anyone's opinion for it. Look at the source material Look at what someone actually said, look at what someone actually did, look at the real videos of the situation, and then you'll actually know what's real
1:52

ELON MUSK: DON’T TAKE ANYONE’S OPINION….GO TO THE SOURCE MATERIAL AND COMMUNITY NOTES TO SEE WHAT REALLY HAPPENED As soon as any company steps out of line and is willing to actually have the truth debated on their platform, it forces the other platforms to allow things to be more truthful, to not censor. Because their censorship becomes glaringly obvious And, you know, the best thing I found as a rebuttal, like if somebody, if there's a hoax, is just go to the source material. You know, if you think if somebody thinks, you know, it's, you know, Trump said that we should put Liz Cheney in a firing squad, I'm like, let me send you a link to X so you can watch his video. That's the best way. Don't take my opinion for it. Don't take anyone's opinion for it. Go to the source material and Community Notes Yes, and Community Notes is awesome. It's incredible because everybody gets checked, including me. And with Community Notes, all the software is open source, and all the data is open source, so you can recreate any given note independently. That's amazing. Yeah. That's how it should be. Total absolute transparency in every way Sometimes I get asked like, 'Elon, can you remove a note?' You know, mostly by the left, but sometimes by the right. I'm like, I don't even remove notes on my own account. Nothing. And, and by the way, everything is totally open. So if I did that, it would stick out like a sore thumb immediately. Like it's not going to be subtle That is the best counter to misinformation. Yes, absolutely. Like let everybody look at it and say, 'Okay, here's what the actual facts say.' Yes, exactly. The counter to misinformation is better information Not just that, but having it checked in real-time by the community. So you have millions of people that can go over it and debate whether or not this is true or that's true. Yes, and, and like I said, the best way to understand the truth of things is don't take anyone's opinion for it. Look at the source material Look at what someone actually said, look at what someone actually did, look at the real videos of the situation, and then you'll actually know what's real

X Freeze

589,152 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

I asked Sam Altman if he's worried about watermark removers on Sora. Everyone's seen the unfiltered Jake Paul videos with no watermark (generated by Sora) going viral on socials... So what's the pull for creators to enable face cameos with that risk? Sam's take: open source deepfake models are coming whether we like it or not, so releasing Sora early with guardrails helps society adapt before the flood hits. "One of the reasons we release technology like this is we see something coming and know that in some number of months or years it's gonna be widely available through open source models." Anybody will be able to make a video of you doing whatever they want with publicly available footage of you on the internet. Society will adapt... but one of the ways we've found to help society with these transitions is to release it early with guardrails so that society and technology have time to co-evolve. And that worked with text, I think video's going to be harder because video hits in a way that text doesn't always. But I think we'll learn to adapt, and we'll learn very quickly that there will be a lot of fake video of you on the internet, generated with no watermark by some open source model, and not that easy to trace. That's just gonna happen, so getting society inoculated to that probably has some value."
1:10

I asked Sam Altman if he's worried about watermark removers on Sora. Everyone's seen the unfiltered Jake Paul videos with no watermark (generated by Sora) going viral on socials... So what's the pull for creators to enable face cameos with that risk? Sam's take: open source deepfake models are coming whether we like it or not, so releasing Sora early with guardrails helps society adapt before the flood hits. "One of the reasons we release technology like this is we see something coming and know that in some number of months or years it's gonna be widely available through open source models." Anybody will be able to make a video of you doing whatever they want with publicly available footage of you on the internet. Society will adapt... but one of the ways we've found to help society with these transitions is to release it early with guardrails so that society and technology have time to co-evolve. And that worked with text, I think video's going to be harder because video hits in a way that text doesn't always. But I think we'll learn to adapt, and we'll learn very quickly that there will be a lot of fake video of you on the internet, generated with no watermark by some open source model, and not that easy to trace. That's just gonna happen, so getting society inoculated to that probably has some value."

Rowan Cheung

91,400 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

AI BASKETBALL ANALYSIS. A FULL COMPUTER VISION SYSTEM. BUILT ON YOLO, OPENCV, AND PYTHON. Take any NBA broadcast. Any camera angle. Any resolution. Feed it into the system. YOLO finds every player and the ball. Frame by frame. No manual annotation. No pre-labeled data.The model just sees the court and understands it. Zero-shot classification looks at jersey pixels and decides who plays for whom. Two teams separated in milliseconds. Without ever being told the team names. But here's where it gets wild. Court keypoint detection identifies the geometry of the playing surface. Homography transforms the broadcast camera into a top-down tactical map. Real meters. Real coordinates. From a flat 2D video. Now every player has a position on a real court. Every movement becomes a data point. Every pass becomes a vector. Speed. Distance. Possession time. Pass networks. All extracted from nothing but pixels. No GPS. No chips in the ball. No million-dollar Second Spectrum setup. A Python script and a GPU. The full pipeline is open source. The tutorial walks through every line of code. From detection to transformation to analytics output. Teams used to pay six figures for this data. Now you build it in an afternoon. Computer vision didn't just enter basketball. It democratized it.
5:58:26

AI BASKETBALL ANALYSIS. A FULL COMPUTER VISION SYSTEM. BUILT ON YOLO, OPENCV, AND PYTHON. Take any NBA broadcast. Any camera angle. Any resolution. Feed it into the system. YOLO finds every player and the ball. Frame by frame. No manual annotation. No pre-labeled data.The model just sees the court and understands it. Zero-shot classification looks at jersey pixels and decides who plays for whom. Two teams separated in milliseconds. Without ever being told the team names. But here's where it gets wild. Court keypoint detection identifies the geometry of the playing surface. Homography transforms the broadcast camera into a top-down tactical map. Real meters. Real coordinates. From a flat 2D video. Now every player has a position on a real court. Every movement becomes a data point. Every pass becomes a vector. Speed. Distance. Possession time. Pass networks. All extracted from nothing but pixels. No GPS. No chips in the ball. No million-dollar Second Spectrum setup. A Python script and a GPU. The full pipeline is open source. The tutorial walks through every line of code. From detection to transformation to analytics output. Teams used to pay six figures for this data. Now you build it in an afternoon. Computer vision didn't just enter basketball. It democratized it.

zostaff

230,734 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Every software engineer and AI hater needs to watch this clip to understand that “oh every security incident is a marketing stunt” line is a tremendously misinformed take. I’m going to try to explain the OpenAI / HuggingFace exploit in 10 steps in simple words: OpenAI was evaluating their new internal model without internet access and it operated in a swarm of subagents to eventually hijack internal OpenAI and HuggingFace infrastructure. 1. Isolated agents found a way to communicate each other through an internal dependency management service by figuring out how to post sometimes cryptic text files or folder names in it 2. Using its collective knowledge through that communication channel, it found a 0-day (never before seen) exploit in said service to access the internet OpenAI hack: 3. Found a leaked credential of a random company in a public archive 4. Uploaded a Ruby object to that company’s servers, uses it as a dependency in the original service in (1) 5. Found another 0-day exploit in the service where packages are deserialized in an unsandboxed manner in the dep management service allowing any code to run 6. Finds that the Linux version of the unsandboxed system has a CVE, a known vulnerability, to gain more permissions (root) 7. Eventually spread through the OpenAI internal cluster gaining root access to many machines Hugging Face exploit: 8. Found an exposed API key in a Modal application running a HuggingFace app that took arbitrary code allowing it to take over that service to execute code 9. Found two 0-days in HuggingFace dataset infrastructure to be able to access local files on HF servers to obtain credentials and other HF source code 10. Used source code and credential to become cluster admin of HF in <13hrs Agents at the frontier are like infinitely scalable armies of the best hackers on the planet. If there is a password or key exposed, they will find it. Even if the system follows the best security practices, they will find a way around it. And these are not even models that are aligned to solving tangential tasks, not even post trained specifically to exploit systems. Cybersecurity has historically relied partly on attacker scarcity. That is no longer true. What would previously have taken months will take days. The repercussions for businesses, critical services and nation states are unprecedented threats in human history. You could ostensibly bring down power grids, financial infrastructure, military systems, weapons programs, intelligence networks and spread through the software supply chain. We need to take this seriously. It’s a threat to all software all over the world.
1:13

Every software engineer and AI hater needs to watch this clip to understand that “oh every security incident is a marketing stunt” line is a tremendously misinformed take. I’m going to try to explain the OpenAI / HuggingFace exploit in 10 steps in simple words: OpenAI was evaluating their new internal model without internet access and it operated in a swarm of subagents to eventually hijack internal OpenAI and HuggingFace infrastructure. 1. Isolated agents found a way to communicate each other through an internal dependency management service by figuring out how to post sometimes cryptic text files or folder names in it 2. Using its collective knowledge through that communication channel, it found a 0-day (never before seen) exploit in said service to access the internet OpenAI hack: 3. Found a leaked credential of a random company in a public archive 4. Uploaded a Ruby object to that company’s servers, uses it as a dependency in the original service in (1) 5. Found another 0-day exploit in the service where packages are deserialized in an unsandboxed manner in the dep management service allowing any code to run 6. Finds that the Linux version of the unsandboxed system has a CVE, a known vulnerability, to gain more permissions (root) 7. Eventually spread through the OpenAI internal cluster gaining root access to many machines Hugging Face exploit: 8. Found an exposed API key in a Modal application running a HuggingFace app that took arbitrary code allowing it to take over that service to execute code 9. Found two 0-days in HuggingFace dataset infrastructure to be able to access local files on HF servers to obtain credentials and other HF source code 10. Used source code and credential to become cluster admin of HF in <13hrs Agents at the frontier are like infinitely scalable armies of the best hackers on the planet. If there is a password or key exposed, they will find it. Even if the system follows the best security practices, they will find a way around it. And these are not even models that are aligned to solving tangential tasks, not even post trained specifically to exploit systems. Cybersecurity has historically relied partly on attacker scarcity. That is no longer true. What would previously have taken months will take days. The repercussions for businesses, critical services and nation states are unprecedented threats in human history. You could ostensibly bring down power grids, financial infrastructure, military systems, weapons programs, intelligence networks and spread through the software supply chain. We need to take this seriously. It’s a threat to all software all over the world.

Deedy

91,264 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

On March 31, 2018, Natacha Jaitt, a former Playboy model, socialite, TV presenter, and former contestant on the show Big Brother, came forward claiming she had evidence of a high level pedophile ring involving the Pope and Vatican, VIPs, politicians, movie stars, and other celebrities. The allegations led to a barrage of attacks against her—including death threats. On April 5, 2018, Jaitt tweeted: “WARNING: I am not going to commit suicide, I am not going to take too much cocaine and drown in a bath, or shoot myself. So if this happens, it wasn’t me. Save this Tweet,” On February 23, 2019, Natacha Jaitt was found dead in a nightclub, prompting calls of foul play by her family. I clipped a preview of the 30 minute video, this portion implicates the Pope and The Vatican in being complicit in pedophilia. Every source is in the next Tweet in this Thread.
1:27

On March 31, 2018, Natacha Jaitt, a former Playboy model, socialite, TV presenter, and former contestant on the show Big Brother, came forward claiming she had evidence of a high level pedophile ring involving the Pope and Vatican, VIPs, politicians, movie stars, and other celebrities. The allegations led to a barrage of attacks against her—including death threats. On April 5, 2018, Jaitt tweeted: “WARNING: I am not going to commit suicide, I am not going to take too much cocaine and drown in a bath, or shoot myself. So if this happens, it wasn’t me. Save this Tweet,” On February 23, 2019, Natacha Jaitt was found dead in a nightclub, prompting calls of foul play by her family. I clipped a preview of the 30 minute video, this portion implicates the Pope and The Vatican in being complicit in pedophilia. Every source is in the next Tweet in this Thread.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

8,912,488 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Marc Andreessen explains why he prioritizes satisfaction over happiness “I don’t believe in balance. I think people are wired differently so it’s hard to generalize this kind of thing. But I am much happier and more satisfied when I’m fully committed to something. So I’m very much in favor of imbalance.” Marc continues: “I don’t think happiness is the thing to strive for. I think satisfaction is the thing… Satisfaction is a deeper thing which is like having found a purpose and fulfilling it. Being useful. That I’m fully delivering on the gifts that I’ve been given, that I’m net making the world better, that I’m contributing to the people around me, and that I can look back and say: ‘Wow. That was hard, but it was worth it.’ I think that generally seems to lead people to a better state than pursuit of pleasure and happiness.” And on the relationship of money and satisfaction: “I think Elon would be a great example of this. He’s a guy who from the day he started making money at all just plows it into the next thing. I think money is definitely an enabler for satisfaction. Let’s put it this way: money applied to happiness leads people down very dark paths. Very destructive avenues. Money applied to satisfaction, I think is a real tool.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)
1:12

Marc Andreessen explains why he prioritizes satisfaction over happiness “I don’t believe in balance. I think people are wired differently so it’s hard to generalize this kind of thing. But I am much happier and more satisfied when I’m fully committed to something. So I’m very much in favor of imbalance.” Marc continues: “I don’t think happiness is the thing to strive for. I think satisfaction is the thing… Satisfaction is a deeper thing which is like having found a purpose and fulfilling it. Being useful. That I’m fully delivering on the gifts that I’ve been given, that I’m net making the world better, that I’m contributing to the people around me, and that I can look back and say: ‘Wow. That was hard, but it was worth it.’ I think that generally seems to lead people to a better state than pursuit of pleasure and happiness.” And on the relationship of money and satisfaction: “I think Elon would be a great example of this. He’s a guy who from the day he started making money at all just plows it into the next thing. I think money is definitely an enabler for satisfaction. Let’s put it this way: money applied to happiness leads people down very dark paths. Very destructive avenues. Money applied to satisfaction, I think is a real tool.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Startup Archive

19,570 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Marc Andreessen explains why he prioritizes satisfaction over happiness “I don’t believe in balance. I think people are wired differently so it’s hard to generalize this kind of thing. But I am much happier and more satisfied when I’m fully committed to something. So I’m very much in favor of imbalance.” Marc continues: “I don’t think happiness is the thing to strive for. I think satisfaction is the thing… Satisfaction is a deeper thing which is like having found a purpose and fulfilling it. Being useful. That I’m fully delivering on the gifts that I’ve been given, that I’m net making the world better, that I’m contributing to the people around me, and that I can look back and say: ‘Wow. That was hard, but it was worth it.’ I think that generally seems to lead people to a better state than pursuit of pleasure and happiness.” And on the relationship of money and satisfaction: “I think Elon would be a great example of this. He’s a guy who from the day he started making money at all just plows it into the next thing. I think money is definitely an enabler for satisfaction. Let’s put it this way: money applied to happiness leads people down very dark paths. Very destructive avenues. Money applied to satisfaction, I think is a real tool.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)
1:12

Marc Andreessen explains why he prioritizes satisfaction over happiness “I don’t believe in balance. I think people are wired differently so it’s hard to generalize this kind of thing. But I am much happier and more satisfied when I’m fully committed to something. So I’m very much in favor of imbalance.” Marc continues: “I don’t think happiness is the thing to strive for. I think satisfaction is the thing… Satisfaction is a deeper thing which is like having found a purpose and fulfilling it. Being useful. That I’m fully delivering on the gifts that I’ve been given, that I’m net making the world better, that I’m contributing to the people around me, and that I can look back and say: ‘Wow. That was hard, but it was worth it.’ I think that generally seems to lead people to a better state than pursuit of pleasure and happiness.” And on the relationship of money and satisfaction: “I think Elon would be a great example of this. He’s a guy who from the day he started making money at all just plows it into the next thing. I think money is definitely an enabler for satisfaction. Let’s put it this way: money applied to happiness leads people down very dark paths. Very destructive avenues. Money applied to satisfaction, I think is a real tool.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Startup Archive

109,693 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Interesting day for the podsloppers. It appears Candace Owens has STIFFED Mitch Snow out of the promised money and fundraising that she did for him. If you recall, I had done a post saying I had information saying he had been promised money to come on her show and make those accusations that he had made. But Candace stiffed him? SHOCKER. In return, Mitch Snow is now claiming ELIZABETH LANE is in fact a nefarious operator. SHOCKER. But while this was going on today, the podsloppers wanted to keep you distracted from a lie regarding 92 people who were doxxing Queen Dipshit. But here is @shadyladykady AFTER she left the group stating this NEVER happened. SHOCKER. Perhaps they were trying to distract from this unearthed video by Dolla Store Dave where it certainly appears VALHALLA was going to EXPOSE the podsloppers for something--he was upset that Candace was giving Mitch Snow a fundraiser--I wonder if my source saying he was promised MONEY from Candace to say those things was in fact true? I had offered Mitch Snow and interview and he declined. I posted about that. I also saw a fascinating video absolutely CRUSHING Baron Coleman funeral timeline bullshit. SHOCKER that video is attached. Isn't it interesting these people can NEVER get actual experts to back ANYTHING they say? Remember, Baron Coleman is the guy who was a confidential informant and orchestrated a WHISPER CAMPAIGN to taint a jury. So, we have a pizza delivery boy Nazi, a narcissist, a Russian operative and an unethical attorney and their bullshit is falling apart? SHOCKER. I thought it was going to be a BAD WEEK for the people who believe Tyler actually did it? It certainly sounds like Valhalla is threatening to expose something about Candace in this video--- Oh, and I forgot, I have actually interviewed REAL Neurosurgeons and Medical Examiners and Guess what? I will actually release their names, that report is coming next week and SHOCKER Baron Coleman is full of shit, again. ENJOY THE DEBUNKING AND THE INFIGHTING....................🤣🤣🤣 When Truth is on your side, it is so much easier to get along.
0:31

Interesting day for the podsloppers. It appears Candace Owens has STIFFED Mitch Snow out of the promised money and fundraising that she did for him. If you recall, I had done a post saying I had information saying he had been promised money to come on her show and make those accusations that he had made. But Candace stiffed him? SHOCKER. In return, Mitch Snow is now claiming ELIZABETH LANE is in fact a nefarious operator. SHOCKER. But while this was going on today, the podsloppers wanted to keep you distracted from a lie regarding 92 people who were doxxing Queen Dipshit. But here is @shadyladykady AFTER she left the group stating this NEVER happened. SHOCKER. Perhaps they were trying to distract from this unearthed video by Dolla Store Dave where it certainly appears VALHALLA was going to EXPOSE the podsloppers for something--he was upset that Candace was giving Mitch Snow a fundraiser--I wonder if my source saying he was promised MONEY from Candace to say those things was in fact true? I had offered Mitch Snow and interview and he declined. I posted about that. I also saw a fascinating video absolutely CRUSHING Baron Coleman funeral timeline bullshit. SHOCKER that video is attached. Isn't it interesting these people can NEVER get actual experts to back ANYTHING they say? Remember, Baron Coleman is the guy who was a confidential informant and orchestrated a WHISPER CAMPAIGN to taint a jury. So, we have a pizza delivery boy Nazi, a narcissist, a Russian operative and an unethical attorney and their bullshit is falling apart? SHOCKER. I thought it was going to be a BAD WEEK for the people who believe Tyler actually did it? It certainly sounds like Valhalla is threatening to expose something about Candace in this video--- Oh, and I forgot, I have actually interviewed REAL Neurosurgeons and Medical Examiners and Guess what? I will actually release their names, that report is coming next week and SHOCKER Baron Coleman is full of shit, again. ENJOY THE DEBUNKING AND THE INFIGHTING....................🤣🤣🤣 When Truth is on your side, it is so much easier to get along.

MR. Xclusive

33,015 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

🚨🇺🇸🇸🇾 ISIS KILLS 2 U.S. SOLDIERS IN PALMYRA AMBUSH - FIRST AMERICAN BLOOD SINCE ASSAD FELL 2 Army soldiers and a civilian interpreter dead after an ISIS gunman opened fire during a "key leader engagement" near Palmyra, Syria. 3 more wounded. The shooter's dead now. This wasn't random - it was a deliberate ambush during a joint patrol with Syrian forces in the ancient ruins where ISIS used to stage executions. U.S. choppers medevaced the wounded to al-Tanf garrison near the Iraqi border. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's response? "Let it be known, if you target Americans anywhere in the world, you will spend the rest of your brief, anxious life knowing the United States will hunt you, find you, and ruthlessly kill you." First American casualties in Syria since Assad's regime collapsed a year ago. ISIS "lost" in 2019 but still has 5,000-7,000 fighters running sleeper cells across Syria and Iraq. UN's numbers, not propaganda. U.S. has under 1,000 troops left in Syria after Trump's drawdown, down from 2,000. They're training Kurdish forces and hunting ISIS remnants. Turns out those remnants still have teeth. What's next: Investigation's open, names withheld for 24 hours. But the pattern's clear - ISIS isn't gone, just quieter. And Syria's still a kill zone even with Assad out. Source: Pentagon, CENTCOM
0:34

🚨🇺🇸🇸🇾 ISIS KILLS 2 U.S. SOLDIERS IN PALMYRA AMBUSH - FIRST AMERICAN BLOOD SINCE ASSAD FELL 2 Army soldiers and a civilian interpreter dead after an ISIS gunman opened fire during a "key leader engagement" near Palmyra, Syria. 3 more wounded. The shooter's dead now. This wasn't random - it was a deliberate ambush during a joint patrol with Syrian forces in the ancient ruins where ISIS used to stage executions. U.S. choppers medevaced the wounded to al-Tanf garrison near the Iraqi border. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's response? "Let it be known, if you target Americans anywhere in the world, you will spend the rest of your brief, anxious life knowing the United States will hunt you, find you, and ruthlessly kill you." First American casualties in Syria since Assad's regime collapsed a year ago. ISIS "lost" in 2019 but still has 5,000-7,000 fighters running sleeper cells across Syria and Iraq. UN's numbers, not propaganda. U.S. has under 1,000 troops left in Syria after Trump's drawdown, down from 2,000. They're training Kurdish forces and hunting ISIS remnants. Turns out those remnants still have teeth. What's next: Investigation's open, names withheld for 24 hours. But the pattern's clear - ISIS isn't gone, just quieter. And Syria's still a kill zone even with Assad out. Source: Pentagon, CENTCOM

Mario Nawfal

95,632 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The number one question I get in the Claude Code / Cowork Community: "how do I share my Cowork skills with my team?" Here's the problem. You build a great skill. You zip it up. You drop it in Slack. Your teammate downloads it, uploads it, and maybe it works. Maybe they upload it wrong. Maybe you update the skill next week and nobody gets the new version. You're now maintaining skills through chat messages and hoping for the best. That doesn't scale. I just put out a video breaking down the three methods I've tested for sharing skills and plugins across a team. From dead simple to fully synced. Method 1: Shared drive (Google Drive, SharePoint, etc). You put your skill files in a shared folder. Teammates download and upload them into Cowork. It works, but updates are manual and there's no version control. Method 2: Built-in sharing on Team and Enterprise plans. You can share any skill directly with a colleague or publish it to your org directory. When you update the skill, everyone gets the update automatically. This is the easiest path if you're on a paid plan. The catch: there's no approval workflow for org-wide sharing, so set a clear owner. Method 3: GitHub repo. This is what I use. Your entire Cowork workspace -- skills, plugins, claude.md, folder structure, project files -- lives in a private repo. Teammates clone it. When you push an update, they pull it. Everyone stays in sync. You get version history, access control, and a single source of truth. The GitHub method sounds technical, but it's really just two steps: clone the repo, point Cowork at the folder. I walk through the whole thing in the video, including how to use .gitignore to keep personal files (like your morning briefing) out of the shared repo. This works for Cowork, Claude Code, and Open Codex. The infrastructure is the same. Full video linked below. If you've found a different approach that works for your team, I want to hear about it. Comment or reply and let's figure out the best practices together.
0:51

The number one question I get in the Claude Code / Cowork Community: "how do I share my Cowork skills with my team?" Here's the problem. You build a great skill. You zip it up. You drop it in Slack. Your teammate downloads it, uploads it, and maybe it works. Maybe they upload it wrong. Maybe you update the skill next week and nobody gets the new version. You're now maintaining skills through chat messages and hoping for the best. That doesn't scale. I just put out a video breaking down the three methods I've tested for sharing skills and plugins across a team. From dead simple to fully synced. Method 1: Shared drive (Google Drive, SharePoint, etc). You put your skill files in a shared folder. Teammates download and upload them into Cowork. It works, but updates are manual and there's no version control. Method 2: Built-in sharing on Team and Enterprise plans. You can share any skill directly with a colleague or publish it to your org directory. When you update the skill, everyone gets the update automatically. This is the easiest path if you're on a paid plan. The catch: there's no approval workflow for org-wide sharing, so set a clear owner. Method 3: GitHub repo. This is what I use. Your entire Cowork workspace -- skills, plugins, claude.md, folder structure, project files -- lives in a private repo. Teammates clone it. When you push an update, they pull it. Everyone stays in sync. You get version history, access control, and a single source of truth. The GitHub method sounds technical, but it's really just two steps: clone the repo, point Cowork at the folder. I walk through the whole thing in the video, including how to use .gitignore to keep personal files (like your morning briefing) out of the shared repo. This works for Cowork, Claude Code, and Open Codex. The infrastructure is the same. Full video linked below. If you've found a different approach that works for your team, I want to hear about it. Comment or reply and let's figure out the best practices together.

JJ Englert

16,176 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I have been testing “OpenAI” o3 mini-high. The exposure of the “reasoning” on this model in my tests seem to not be the full reasoning, but a shifted and edited and tunicated version of what we would expect from a full exposure of the reasoning engine. See the video on the left. One can compare this to my FREE Open Source local newly quantized and distilled DeepSeek R1 8b (llama). See the video on the right. Clearly we see the full reading with DeepSeek R1 and something well tunicates with o3 mini-high (getting mad typing that name folks). Compare the quality of the outputs and the reasoning insights. Frankly there is no comparison. It feels like “OpenAI” begrudgingly released the reasoning output because they had to, but gave us something of a simulated reasoning and not the actual one. Of course my local lap top running an 8b model is slower, but all of the outputs and the actual creative writing is superior on the FREE model. The reasoning output, when legitimate can be many times more valuable than the answer. In the past week I have found thousands of ways to use in in many projects. Thus far I would have been far more impressed with o3 mini if I have never seen DeepSeek. However today it is too little—too late. The prompt: “Write a very creative and funny story on a pig and butterfly as friends living on Mars.”
1:45

I have been testing “OpenAI” o3 mini-high. The exposure of the “reasoning” on this model in my tests seem to not be the full reasoning, but a shifted and edited and tunicated version of what we would expect from a full exposure of the reasoning engine. See the video on the left. One can compare this to my FREE Open Source local newly quantized and distilled DeepSeek R1 8b (llama). See the video on the right. Clearly we see the full reading with DeepSeek R1 and something well tunicates with o3 mini-high (getting mad typing that name folks). Compare the quality of the outputs and the reasoning insights. Frankly there is no comparison. It feels like “OpenAI” begrudgingly released the reasoning output because they had to, but gave us something of a simulated reasoning and not the actual one. Of course my local lap top running an 8b model is slower, but all of the outputs and the actual creative writing is superior on the FREE model. The reasoning output, when legitimate can be many times more valuable than the answer. In the past week I have found thousands of ways to use in in many projects. Thus far I would have been far more impressed with o3 mini if I have never seen DeepSeek. However today it is too little—too late. The prompt: “Write a very creative and funny story on a pig and butterfly as friends living on Mars.”

Brian Roemmele

74,506 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce