Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Fourth Amendment protections only apply where there’s a reasonable expectation of privacy. No expectation, no protection. That’s black-letter constitutional law. Put your evidence at the curb? Police can take it. No warrant needed. An illegal alien fugitive hiding from deportation has no greater privacy rights than a burglar hiding... show more

Andrew Branca Show

171,213 subscribers

34,473 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: ICE, CAMERAS & PHONES (U.S. Constitution — First & Fourth Amendments) No crime. No obstruction. Here is the clear constitutional ground from 1️⃣ Can ICE remove or break your door camera? No. The Fourth Amendment protects your home and property from unreasonable search or seizure. Your door camera is your property. It cannot be dismantled, covered, or destroyed without a judicial warrant signed by a judge. 2️⃣ Can ICE stop you from filming? No. The First Amendment protects your right to record government officials performing their duties in public spaces. 3️⃣ Can ICE confiscate your phone? Not without proper legal authority. The Fourth Amendment protects your phone — and its digital contents — from warrantless search or seizure. Stay calm. Assert your rights clearly. Do not consent. Help get PAXIS into the hands of every immigrant and ally:

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: ICE, CAMERAS & PHONES (U.S. Constitution — First & Fourth Amendments) No crime. No obstruction. Here is the clear constitutional ground from 1️⃣ Can ICE remove or break your door camera? No. The Fourth Amendment protects your home and property from unreasonable search or seizure. Your door camera is your property. It cannot be dismantled, covered, or destroyed without a judicial warrant signed by a judge. 2️⃣ Can ICE stop you from filming? No. The First Amendment protects your right to record government officials performing their duties in public spaces. 3️⃣ Can ICE confiscate your phone? Not without proper legal authority. The Fourth Amendment protects your phone — and its digital contents — from warrantless search or seizure. Stay calm. Assert your rights clearly. Do not consent. Help get PAXIS into the hands of every immigrant and ally:

Joe Walsh

38,860 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

FLOCK CAMERAS ARE TESTING THE LIMITS OF PRIVACY Do Americans have a constitutional expectation of privacy in public? Courts have generally allowed police to observe license plates and vehicles on public roads. But Flock’s growing camera networks raise a larger question: when does collecting, storing, and searching those records become mass tracking? A single camera snapshot may be treated differently from a system that builds a searchable record of where someone drives, works, shops, worships, or seeks medical care. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, and the constitutional line may depend on how much of a person’s daily life these networks can reconstruct. Connor Boyack (Connor Boyack 📚) joins me to break down Flock cameras, privacy rights, and the legal limits on an expanding surveillance system.

FLOCK CAMERAS ARE TESTING THE LIMITS OF PRIVACY Do Americans have a constitutional expectation of privacy in public? Courts have generally allowed police to observe license plates and vehicles on public roads. But Flock’s growing camera networks raise a larger question: when does collecting, storing, and searching those records become mass tracking? A single camera snapshot may be treated differently from a system that builds a searchable record of where someone drives, works, shops, worships, or seeks medical care. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, and the constitutional line may depend on how much of a person’s daily life these networks can reconstruct. Connor Boyack (Connor Boyack 📚) joins me to break down Flock cameras, privacy rights, and the legal limits on an expanding surveillance system.

Redacted

17,918 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

HAPPY EASTER FROM ICE! ICE pointed semi-automatic weapons at a retired American couple in a church parking lot. No judicial warrant. No rights read. Just raw intimidation dressed up as law enforcement. That is not public safety. That is a constitutional line being trampled by armed thugs who think “we don’t need one” overrides the Fourth Amendment. exists to hold that line and cut through the myths, misinformation and lies. FUCK ICE, FUCK TRUMP, FUCK FASCISM:

HAPPY EASTER FROM ICE! ICE pointed semi-automatic weapons at a retired American couple in a church parking lot. No judicial warrant. No rights read. Just raw intimidation dressed up as law enforcement. That is not public safety. That is a constitutional line being trampled by armed thugs who think “we don’t need one” overrides the Fourth Amendment. exists to hold that line and cut through the myths, misinformation and lies. FUCK ICE, FUCK TRUMP, FUCK FASCISM:

Joe Walsh

27,045 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

jasonfollowell A daughter called 911 requesting a mental health officer for her sister. At no point was there a verified, immediate threat of harm to herself or others. Officers from Corpus Christi Police Department (CCPD) arrived, knocked on the door, and then entered the home without a warrant and without consent. They only identified themselves after already entering. This raises serious constitutional concerns, including violations of the Fourth Amendment

jasonfollowell A daughter called 911 requesting a mental health officer for her sister. At no point was there a verified, immediate threat of harm to herself or others. Officers from Corpus Christi Police Department (CCPD) arrived, knocked on the door, and then entered the home without a warrant and without consent. They only identified themselves after already entering. This raises serious constitutional concerns, including violations of the Fourth Amendment

Justa Dude

21,530 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 Another day, another illegal ICE arrest in Chicago… this time in Rogers Park. Yesterday, ICE agents walked up to a U.S. citizen’s car, opened his door, and when he asked if they had a warrant, one agent said: “I don’t need a warrant.” Then they pulled the passenger out of the car and took them. Let’s be clear, that’s not how the law works. -Federal Judge Jeffrey Cummings ruled last month that ICE cannot make arrests in Illinois without a judicial warrant or probable cause. - The Fourth Amendment protects everyone from unlawful search and seizure… especially inside their private vehicle. -Opening someone’s car door without consent or a warrant is an unconstitutional entry. -And saying “I don’t need a warrant” is an outright admission of violating that law. These aren’t isolated “mistakes.” They’re deliberate violations of a federal court order… and of your constitutional rights. If ICE believes the law doesn’t apply to them, then who exactly are they protecting?

🚨 Another day, another illegal ICE arrest in Chicago… this time in Rogers Park. Yesterday, ICE agents walked up to a U.S. citizen’s car, opened his door, and when he asked if they had a warrant, one agent said: “I don’t need a warrant.” Then they pulled the passenger out of the car and took them. Let’s be clear, that’s not how the law works. -Federal Judge Jeffrey Cummings ruled last month that ICE cannot make arrests in Illinois without a judicial warrant or probable cause. - The Fourth Amendment protects everyone from unlawful search and seizure… especially inside their private vehicle. -Opening someone’s car door without consent or a warrant is an unconstitutional entry. -And saying “I don’t need a warrant” is an outright admission of violating that law. These aren’t isolated “mistakes.” They’re deliberate violations of a federal court order… and of your constitutional rights. If ICE believes the law doesn’t apply to them, then who exactly are they protecting?

Jesus Freakin Congress

233,851 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.

Jesus Freakin Congress

56,369 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents broke into another family’s home without a warrant in Minneapolis, a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment, and illegally detained a U.S. citizen, half-naked, in subzero temperatures. Yesterday, ICE agents showed up at a Hmong family’s home, forced their way inside without a warrant, trashed the house, put a gun to the daughter-in-law’s head, and dragged the father out wearing only boxers, refusing to let him put on clothes, while it was -9 degrees outside. Then it gets worse. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen. ICE illegally entered his home, illegally detained him, drove him around for over an hour, interrogated and fingerprinted him, and only after realizing they had no authority to hold him, quietly dumped him back at his house like nothing happened. No warrant. No charges. No consequences. This isn’t immigration enforcement… It’s armed home invasions, constitutional violations, and state-sanctioned kidnapping. And if they can do this to a U.S. citizen in his own home, they can do it to you.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents broke into another family’s home without a warrant in Minneapolis, a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment, and illegally detained a U.S. citizen, half-naked, in subzero temperatures. Yesterday, ICE agents showed up at a Hmong family’s home, forced their way inside without a warrant, trashed the house, put a gun to the daughter-in-law’s head, and dragged the father out wearing only boxers, refusing to let him put on clothes, while it was -9 degrees outside. Then it gets worse. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen. ICE illegally entered his home, illegally detained him, drove him around for over an hour, interrogated and fingerprinted him, and only after realizing they had no authority to hold him, quietly dumped him back at his house like nothing happened. No warrant. No charges. No consequences. This isn’t immigration enforcement… It’s armed home invasions, constitutional violations, and state-sanctioned kidnapping. And if they can do this to a U.S. citizen in his own home, they can do it to you.

Jesus Freakin Congress

693,581 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A man alleged that in Bengaluru, vehicles parked in no-parking zones are fined only if they are from outside Karnataka. If the vehicle has a Karnataka number plate, no action is taken against it. In simple words, you can break the law if you are a vote for the government. You can park your car in the middle of the road and there will be no action, because the government needs your vote.

A man alleged that in Bengaluru, vehicles parked in no-parking zones are fined only if they are from outside Karnataka. If the vehicle has a Karnataka number plate, no action is taken against it. In simple words, you can break the law if you are a vote for the government. You can park your car in the middle of the road and there will be no action, because the government needs your vote.

कुंभकरण

269,795 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Understand the law and constitution via - DoorDash deliverer is hounded by masked, unidentified thugs who show no warrant and claim the house owner is harboring - this is a lie. What PAXIS says about allowing an undocumented immigrant onto your property is grounded in law and the constitution: If someone delivers food, visits socially, or enters for a temporary, lawful purpose, and you are not attempting to hide or conceal them, this is not “harboring”. You are not obligated to report someone’s status, and you are protected by the Fourth Amendment from warrantless searches of your home. Refusing entry to ICE agents who lack a judicial warrant is a constitutional right, not obstruction.

Understand the law and constitution via - DoorDash deliverer is hounded by masked, unidentified thugs who show no warrant and claim the house owner is harboring - this is a lie. What PAXIS says about allowing an undocumented immigrant onto your property is grounded in law and the constitution: If someone delivers food, visits socially, or enters for a temporary, lawful purpose, and you are not attempting to hide or conceal them, this is not “harboring”. You are not obligated to report someone’s status, and you are protected by the Fourth Amendment from warrantless searches of your home. Refusing entry to ICE agents who lack a judicial warrant is a constitutional right, not obstruction.

Joe Walsh

96,992 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

ICE ENTERED A FACTORY LOOKING FOR BROWN-SKINNED WORKERS. NO WARRANT. NO INVITATION. TRESPASSING. ILLEGAL. In McCook, Illinois, masked, armed ICE illegals entered Assemblers Inc. Agents aggressively ordered the person recording to “get the fuck back.” ICE has released no names, alleged offenses or warrant information. Two more people disappeared. explains: Employee-only areas and restrooms are private. ICE generally needs consent or a judicial warrant signed by a judge. Record safely, preserve evidence and demand answers. Know where ICE’s authority ends and your rights begin: PAXIS is funded entirely by donations. Help keep it free:

ICE ENTERED A FACTORY LOOKING FOR BROWN-SKINNED WORKERS. NO WARRANT. NO INVITATION. TRESPASSING. ILLEGAL. In McCook, Illinois, masked, armed ICE illegals entered Assemblers Inc. Agents aggressively ordered the person recording to “get the fuck back.” ICE has released no names, alleged offenses or warrant information. Two more people disappeared. explains: Employee-only areas and restrooms are private. ICE generally needs consent or a judicial warrant signed by a judge. Record safely, preserve evidence and demand answers. Know where ICE’s authority ends and your rights begin: PAXIS is funded entirely by donations. Help keep it free:

Joe Walsh

16,387 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Carney is asked "Now, I'm curious, are you comfortable with the notion that police or intelligence can go to any service provider?" "It can be doctors, counselors, child therapists, pharmacists, and obtain information about if someone is a client, since when, where they obtain those services without a warrant." Carney "And where there is, where it is merited and there is probable cause, possible expectation, potential illegal trafficking of, for example, and this is a case, unfortunately, in our society of precursors and components of fentanyl, which kills thousands of Canadians every year" Carney is trading your privacy rights under the guise of fixing a problem that Liberals created - a free flow and use of illegal drugs that are killing Canadians Mark Carney

Carney is asked "Now, I'm curious, are you comfortable with the notion that police or intelligence can go to any service provider?" "It can be doctors, counselors, child therapists, pharmacists, and obtain information about if someone is a client, since when, where they obtain those services without a warrant." Carney "And where there is, where it is merited and there is probable cause, possible expectation, potential illegal trafficking of, for example, and this is a case, unfortunately, in our society of precursors and components of fentanyl, which kills thousands of Canadians every year" Carney is trading your privacy rights under the guise of fixing a problem that Liberals created - a free flow and use of illegal drugs that are killing Canadians Mark Carney

cbcwatcher

128,474 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The violence against Zimbabwean human rights lawyer Doug Coltart today at the parliamentary hearings for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 at the Harare City Sports Centre is disgraceful. The racist abuse directed at him by fellow Zimbabweans is equally shameful, exposing a dangerous erosion of tolerance, respect for the rule of law, and basic democratic values. Whatever happens with Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, it is already tainted by these actions of ZANUPF hooligans, thugs, and despicable individuals. You cannot take parliamentary hearings to the people and then assault them for airing their views, for opposing what you are saying, or for holding alternative opinions. That is not consultation, it is intimidation, and it completely undermines the legitimacy of the entire process. Beating up a fellow Zimbabwean who is a lawyer, stealing his phone, and preventing him from speaking is the very worst conduct in any parliamentary hearing process, including this Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. Those behind these actions should be deeply ashamed, because they are not only undermining the process, they are embarrassing the country and eroding respect for the rule of law.

The violence against Zimbabwean human rights lawyer Doug Coltart today at the parliamentary hearings for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 at the Harare City Sports Centre is disgraceful. The racist abuse directed at him by fellow Zimbabweans is equally shameful, exposing a dangerous erosion of tolerance, respect for the rule of law, and basic democratic values. Whatever happens with Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, it is already tainted by these actions of ZANUPF hooligans, thugs, and despicable individuals. You cannot take parliamentary hearings to the people and then assault them for airing their views, for opposing what you are saying, or for holding alternative opinions. That is not consultation, it is intimidation, and it completely undermines the legitimacy of the entire process. Beating up a fellow Zimbabwean who is a lawyer, stealing his phone, and preventing him from speaking is the very worst conduct in any parliamentary hearing process, including this Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. Those behind these actions should be deeply ashamed, because they are not only undermining the process, they are embarrassing the country and eroding respect for the rule of law.

Hopewell Chin’ono

52,134 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Update: The Zimbabwe Republic Police in Mutare Are Still holding TENDAI BITI and 3 others without any charge,, doing interviews and may likely detain them for consulting residents on constitutional amendments number 3 with Mutare residents. Meanwhile today ZANU PF had many such public meetings unsanctioned, meaning the police are selectively applying the law against opposing voices. In this clip: ZANU PF Mashonaland East province chairperson Cde Daniel Garwe today led a gathering in support of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 at Chikondoma Stadium in Mutoko district. Human Rights Watch Mary Lawlor

Update: The Zimbabwe Republic Police in Mutare Are Still holding TENDAI BITI and 3 others without any charge,, doing interviews and may likely detain them for consulting residents on constitutional amendments number 3 with Mutare residents. Meanwhile today ZANU PF had many such public meetings unsanctioned, meaning the police are selectively applying the law against opposing voices. In this clip: ZANU PF Mashonaland East province chairperson Cde Daniel Garwe today led a gathering in support of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 at Chikondoma Stadium in Mutoko district. Human Rights Watch Mary Lawlor

ZimNewsUpdates

18,150 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

ICE arrested a teenage boy — a U.S. citizen — at gunpoint in his home with no warrant and no reason. He was later released. gives you the lawful and constitutional rights you need to prevent this — or, if you can’t, to act immediately and clearly. IF ICE SHOWS UP WITHOUT A WARRANT — READ THIS: 📍 Don’t open the door. Say: “Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?” 📄 Ask to see it. Slide it under the door. ICE papers aren’t enough. 🚪 No warrant = no entry. Say: “You may not enter without a judicial warrant.” 🧒🏽 Protect your kids. Say their full name, age, and citizenship aloud. Record if safe. 🤐 Stay calm. Remain silent. Say: “I want a lawyer. I will not answer questions.” 📝 After they leave: Write everything down. Contact a legal aid group immediately. ⚖️ You have rights. Use them. Don’t face it alone. Help fund the completion and distribution of PAXIS in the USA:

ICE arrested a teenage boy — a U.S. citizen — at gunpoint in his home with no warrant and no reason. He was later released. gives you the lawful and constitutional rights you need to prevent this — or, if you can’t, to act immediately and clearly. IF ICE SHOWS UP WITHOUT A WARRANT — READ THIS: 📍 Don’t open the door. Say: “Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?” 📄 Ask to see it. Slide it under the door. ICE papers aren’t enough. 🚪 No warrant = no entry. Say: “You may not enter without a judicial warrant.” 🧒🏽 Protect your kids. Say their full name, age, and citizenship aloud. Record if safe. 🤐 Stay calm. Remain silent. Say: “I want a lawyer. I will not answer questions.” 📝 After they leave: Write everything down. Contact a legal aid group immediately. ⚖️ You have rights. Use them. Don’t face it alone. Help fund the completion and distribution of PAXIS in the USA:

Joe Walsh

16,129 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨ICE agents were filmed assaulting a group of U.S. citizens for no reason, in California. In the video, ICE agents walked up to a group of U.S. citizens while they were filming, on public property, and then started shoving them. Then, they escalated even further, pointing pepper spray at multiple people who were doing nothing but recording, before casually walking back to their cars and leaving. No additional arrests, no threat identified, no justification given… just force. So, let’s call this what it is… A violation of the First Amendment. You have a protected right to film law enforcement in public… These people weren’t interfering with anything… ICE agents approached them and retaliated against them for exercising that right. That’s unconstitutional. And then there’s the Fourth Amendment… Law enforcement cannot use force without justification. They cannot walk up to civilians, put hands on them, and escalate to threats of chemical force because they feel like it. Shoving people who pose no threat and pointing pepper spray at people who are standing is excessive force… and it’s an unlawful seizure, even if it only lasts seconds. And the pattern here is what everyone should pay attention to. They finish an arrest…then turn to the bystanders. They don’t de-escalate, they expand the confrontation. They don’t leave, they intimidate. Because if federal agents can walk up to you on a sidewalk and assault you for exercising your first amendment rights… then your rights don’t exist.

🚨ICE agents were filmed assaulting a group of U.S. citizens for no reason, in California. In the video, ICE agents walked up to a group of U.S. citizens while they were filming, on public property, and then started shoving them. Then, they escalated even further, pointing pepper spray at multiple people who were doing nothing but recording, before casually walking back to their cars and leaving. No additional arrests, no threat identified, no justification given… just force. So, let’s call this what it is… A violation of the First Amendment. You have a protected right to film law enforcement in public… These people weren’t interfering with anything… ICE agents approached them and retaliated against them for exercising that right. That’s unconstitutional. And then there’s the Fourth Amendment… Law enforcement cannot use force without justification. They cannot walk up to civilians, put hands on them, and escalate to threats of chemical force because they feel like it. Shoving people who pose no threat and pointing pepper spray at people who are standing is excessive force… and it’s an unlawful seizure, even if it only lasts seconds. And the pattern here is what everyone should pay attention to. They finish an arrest…then turn to the bystanders. They don’t de-escalate, they expand the confrontation. They don’t leave, they intimidate. Because if federal agents can walk up to you on a sidewalk and assault you for exercising your first amendment rights… then your rights don’t exist.

Jesus Freakin Congress

55,679 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Driver shows the power of remaining silent during a traffic stop—and why knowing your rights matters. The deputy kept asking questions. The driver kept calmly declining to answer. No yelling. No attitude. No unnecessary admissions. He provided the documentation required, complied with lawful requests, and refused to volunteer information that could be used against him. The stop ended with nothing more than a verbal warning. Whether you agree with his approach or not, this is a reminder that understanding your constitutional rights—and your legal obligations—can make a difference during an encounter with law enforcement. Would you have handled the stop the same way?

Driver shows the power of remaining silent during a traffic stop—and why knowing your rights matters. The deputy kept asking questions. The driver kept calmly declining to answer. No yelling. No attitude. No unnecessary admissions. He provided the documentation required, complied with lawful requests, and refused to volunteer information that could be used against him. The stop ended with nothing more than a verbal warning. Whether you agree with his approach or not, this is a reminder that understanding your constitutional rights—and your legal obligations—can make a difference during an encounter with law enforcement. Would you have handled the stop the same way?

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

268,754 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten