Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 Another day, another illegal ICE arrest in Chicago… this time in Rogers Park. Yesterday, ICE agents walked up to a U.S. citizen’s car, opened his door, and when he asked if they had a warrant, one agent said: “I don’t need a warrant.” Then they pulled the passenger... out of the car and took them. Let’s be clear, that’s not how the law works. -Federal Judge Jeffrey Cummings ruled last month that ICE cannot make arrests in Illinois without a judicial warrant or probable cause. - The Fourth Amendment protects everyone from unlawful search and seizure… especially inside their private vehicle. -Opening someone’s car door without consent or a warrant is an unconstitutional entry. -And saying “I don’t need a warrant” is an outright admission of violating that law. These aren’t isolated “mistakes.” They’re deliberate violations of a federal court order… and of your constitutional rights. If ICE believes the law doesn’t apply to them, then who exactly are they protecting?show more

Jesus Freakin Congress

59,485 subscribers

233,851 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 ICE agents caught violating a federal judge’s order, yet again, in Chicago. This morning, around 9:43 AM, at 2134 N. Western Ave, ICE agents were filmed making a warrantless arrest in a parking lot. When a woman on scene asked if they had a warrant, one of the agents admitted they did not. She told them, “Then you can’t take him out of his car and arrest him.” They ignored her, and still took the man. That’s not a gray area. It’s a direct violation of a federal court order and the Fourth Amendment, which protects every person from unlawful seizure. Just last month, Judge Jeffrey Cummings ruled that ICE cannot make arrests in Illinois without a judicial warrant or a clear probable-cause determination. The agency was ordered to retrain its officers, document every warrantless arrest, and report them publicly. How are agents protecting communities when they are blatantly violating the constitution?

🚨 ICE agents caught violating a federal judge’s order, yet again, in Chicago. This morning, around 9:43 AM, at 2134 N. Western Ave, ICE agents were filmed making a warrantless arrest in a parking lot. When a woman on scene asked if they had a warrant, one of the agents admitted they did not. She told them, “Then you can’t take him out of his car and arrest him.” They ignored her, and still took the man. That’s not a gray area. It’s a direct violation of a federal court order and the Fourth Amendment, which protects every person from unlawful seizure. Just last month, Judge Jeffrey Cummings ruled that ICE cannot make arrests in Illinois without a judicial warrant or a clear probable-cause determination. The agency was ordered to retrain its officers, document every warrantless arrest, and report them publicly. How are agents protecting communities when they are blatantly violating the constitution?

Jesus Freakin Congress

324,132 views • 10 months ago

THEY SAID THEY HAD A WARRANT. THEY LIED. Two ICE agents in an unmarked car were found roaming through houses on a construction site. But when the site manager confronted them and demanded to see the warrant, they suddenly had somewhere else to be. No warrant. No answers. Just federal agents trespassing until someone challenged their authority. helps workers, employers and property managers verify warrants, protect private property, document ICE activity and respond without surrendering their rights. Know the law. Ask to see the warrant. Make them prove their authority. PAXIS is free for immigrants and citizens. Help keep it that way:

THEY SAID THEY HAD A WARRANT. THEY LIED. Two ICE agents in an unmarked car were found roaming through houses on a construction site. But when the site manager confronted them and demanded to see the warrant, they suddenly had somewhere else to be. No warrant. No answers. Just federal agents trespassing until someone challenged their authority. helps workers, employers and property managers verify warrants, protect private property, document ICE activity and respond without surrendering their rights. Know the law. Ask to see the warrant. Make them prove their authority. PAXIS is free for immigrants and citizens. Help keep it that way:

Joe Walsh

48,539 views • 1 month ago

In Phoenix, Arizona, ICE/Border Patrol agents casually admitted on camera that they broke the law and assaulted a U.S. citizen… In the video, the agent justifies smashing a car window and dragging a man out by saying, “your brother didn’t get out of the car.” The driver replies, “And you didn’t have a warrant.” And the agent… with the confidence of someone who’s never even looked at the Constitution… snaps back: “I don’t need a warrant… you should probably learn the law.” Which is wild, since he’s the one violating it, all while having his weapon drawn. For the record: the Fourth Amendment bars exactly this kind of warrantless search and seizure. ICE’s powers under 8 U.S.C. § 1357 don’t allow them to break into a vehicle just because someone didn’t hop out fast enough, especially a passenger. Violating someone’s rights under color of law is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 242. And smashing a window to drag out a citizen without legal cause isn’t “immigration enforcement”… it’s assault under Arizona law. ICE loves to say “ignorance of the law is no excuse,” but apparently that motto doesn’t apply when they’re the ones clueless. If a random guy did this, he’d be in handcuffs. When ICE does it on camera? They call it “Tuesday.” Maybe before lecturing people to “learn the law,” these agents could try reading it.

In Phoenix, Arizona, ICE/Border Patrol agents casually admitted on camera that they broke the law and assaulted a U.S. citizen… In the video, the agent justifies smashing a car window and dragging a man out by saying, “your brother didn’t get out of the car.” The driver replies, “And you didn’t have a warrant.” And the agent… with the confidence of someone who’s never even looked at the Constitution… snaps back: “I don’t need a warrant… you should probably learn the law.” Which is wild, since he’s the one violating it, all while having his weapon drawn. For the record: the Fourth Amendment bars exactly this kind of warrantless search and seizure. ICE’s powers under 8 U.S.C. § 1357 don’t allow them to break into a vehicle just because someone didn’t hop out fast enough, especially a passenger. Violating someone’s rights under color of law is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 242. And smashing a window to drag out a citizen without legal cause isn’t “immigration enforcement”… it’s assault under Arizona law. ICE loves to say “ignorance of the law is no excuse,” but apparently that motto doesn’t apply when they’re the ones clueless. If a random guy did this, he’d be in handcuffs. When ICE does it on camera? They call it “Tuesday.” Maybe before lecturing people to “learn the law,” these agents could try reading it.

Jesus Freakin Congress

443,462 views • 9 months ago

If ICE agents come to your door without a judicial warrant signed by a judge, is clear: you do not have to talk to them, open the door, answer questions, or let them inside. You can say through the closed door: “I do not consent to entry. Please leave.” FIGHT ICE WITH THE LAW:

If ICE agents come to your door without a judicial warrant signed by a judge, is clear: you do not have to talk to them, open the door, answer questions, or let them inside. You can say through the closed door: “I do not consent to entry. Please leave.” FIGHT ICE WITH THE LAW:

Joe Walsh

31,813 views • 2 months ago

I asked Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s office how exactly would ICE get a signed judicial warrant for illegal immigrants in the Fairfax County jail, like Abdul Jalloh, who is accused of murdering a Virginia mother. Spanberger’s office still has not responded. Earlier this week, Spanberger’s office said ICE should request a signed judicial warrant if they want Jalloh deported. Jonathan Fahey says that might sound reasonable, but isn’t reasonable, and that Spanberger is knowingly putting up roadblocks to prevent ICE from doing their job and deporting Jalloh, who has a lengthy violent criminal history. ICE says, “Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides ICE officers the authority to arrest aliens without a judicial warrant. In fact, no judge in this country has the authority to issue a warrant for a civil immigration violation. Congress, by statute, vested this authorization solely to supervisory immigration officers. Local police officers don’t need a warrant when they encounter someone breaking the law in a public space, and the same holds true for ICE officers. Obstructing or otherwise interfering with an ICE arrest is a crime, and anyone involved may be subject to prosecution under federal law.”

I asked Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s office how exactly would ICE get a signed judicial warrant for illegal immigrants in the Fairfax County jail, like Abdul Jalloh, who is accused of murdering a Virginia mother. Spanberger’s office still has not responded. Earlier this week, Spanberger’s office said ICE should request a signed judicial warrant if they want Jalloh deported. Jonathan Fahey says that might sound reasonable, but isn’t reasonable, and that Spanberger is knowingly putting up roadblocks to prevent ICE from doing their job and deporting Jalloh, who has a lengthy violent criminal history. ICE says, “Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides ICE officers the authority to arrest aliens without a judicial warrant. In fact, no judge in this country has the authority to issue a warrant for a civil immigration violation. Congress, by statute, vested this authorization solely to supervisory immigration officers. Local police officers don’t need a warrant when they encounter someone breaking the law in a public space, and the same holds true for ICE officers. Obstructing or otherwise interfering with an ICE arrest is a crime, and anyone involved may be subject to prosecution under federal law.”

Nick Minock

206,373 views • 6 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents in New York illegally surrounded two cars and demanded the people inside prove their citizenship. Community members showed up and immediately started asking the questions ICE never wants asked on camera: “Do you have a warrant?” The agents claimed they did. But when people asked to actually SEE the warrant… they refused. Because they didn’t have one. That’s the constitutional violation right there. In the United States, federal agents cannot legally detain people, block their vehicles in, and demand proof of citizenship without lawful justification. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. You don’t lose those rights because ICE decides to profile you. And unless agents have a judicial warrant signed by a judge, or actual legal probable cause tied to a crime, they cannot just trap people in their cars fishing for immigration status. ICE keeps counting on intimidation instead of law. They surround cars with multiple agents, act aggressive, throw around words like “warrant,” and hope people are too scared to question them. But the second community members demanded proof, the whole thing fell apart. Both cars were eventually released… because ICE never had the legal right to stop them in the first place. This is exactly why people recording matters. This is exactly why communities showing up matters. And this is exactly why constitutional rights matter… especially when federal agents are acting like they don’t apply to them anymore.

Jesus Freakin Congress

103,454 views • 4 months ago

🚨BREAKING: in Minneapolis, ICE/Border Patrol agents illegally smashed the glass window of an APARTMENT BUILDING, without a warrant, to illegally arrest someone who lived inside. Once again, proving they don’t “protect communities”… they endanger everyone in them. In the video, you can see agents going up the stairs after breaking the window next to the door to force their way in. A resident states there were clear signs instructing law enforcement to go to the front entrance with a warrant if they needed access. They didn’t. Instead, agents chose to break the window, leaving the building wide open to anyone, and exposing residents to freezing temperatures… All because they didn’t have a warrant, and because they believe the law doesn’t apply to them. If this doesn’t infuriate you, then stop pretending you believe in the Constitution. Because if federal agents can smash their way into this apartment building, without a warrant, today… they can do it to yours tomorrow.

🚨BREAKING: in Minneapolis, ICE/Border Patrol agents illegally smashed the glass window of an APARTMENT BUILDING, without a warrant, to illegally arrest someone who lived inside. Once again, proving they don’t “protect communities”… they endanger everyone in them. In the video, you can see agents going up the stairs after breaking the window next to the door to force their way in. A resident states there were clear signs instructing law enforcement to go to the front entrance with a warrant if they needed access. They didn’t. Instead, agents chose to break the window, leaving the building wide open to anyone, and exposing residents to freezing temperatures… All because they didn’t have a warrant, and because they believe the law doesn’t apply to them. If this doesn’t infuriate you, then stop pretending you believe in the Constitution. Because if federal agents can smash their way into this apartment building, without a warrant, today… they can do it to yours tomorrow.

Jesus Freakin Congress

407,586 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.

Jesus Freakin Congress

126,024 views • 8 months ago

ICE arrested a teenage boy — a U.S. citizen — at gunpoint in his home with no warrant and no reason. He was later released. gives you the lawful and constitutional rights you need to prevent this — or, if you can’t, to act immediately and clearly. IF ICE SHOWS UP WITHOUT A WARRANT — READ THIS: 📍 Don’t open the door. Say: “Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?” 📄 Ask to see it. Slide it under the door. ICE papers aren’t enough. 🚪 No warrant = no entry. Say: “You may not enter without a judicial warrant.” 🧒🏽 Protect your kids. Say their full name, age, and citizenship aloud. Record if safe. 🤐 Stay calm. Remain silent. Say: “I want a lawyer. I will not answer questions.” 📝 After they leave: Write everything down. Contact a legal aid group immediately. ⚖️ You have rights. Use them. Don’t face it alone. Help fund the completion and distribution of PAXIS in the USA:

ICE arrested a teenage boy — a U.S. citizen — at gunpoint in his home with no warrant and no reason. He was later released. gives you the lawful and constitutional rights you need to prevent this — or, if you can’t, to act immediately and clearly. IF ICE SHOWS UP WITHOUT A WARRANT — READ THIS: 📍 Don’t open the door. Say: “Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?” 📄 Ask to see it. Slide it under the door. ICE papers aren’t enough. 🚪 No warrant = no entry. Say: “You may not enter without a judicial warrant.” 🧒🏽 Protect your kids. Say their full name, age, and citizenship aloud. Record if safe. 🤐 Stay calm. Remain silent. Say: “I want a lawyer. I will not answer questions.” 📝 After they leave: Write everything down. Contact a legal aid group immediately. ⚖️ You have rights. Use them. Don’t face it alone. Help fund the completion and distribution of PAXIS in the USA:

Joe Walsh

16,129 views • 7 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson CLAPS BACK at the Fake News saying ICE should just GIVE UP if an illegal hides behind a door, says judicial warrants a non-starter "Apply LOGIC and REASON!" "They lock the door, what is ICE supposed to do?! 'Oh, gee whiz, they locked the door, guess we'll move on!'" 💯 "But Democrats want a new layer of warrant requirements, a judicial warrant on TOP of the immigration warrant. WE CAN'T DO THAT." "20 million illegals in 4 years...IMAGINE if we had to go through a judicial warrant!"

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson CLAPS BACK at the Fake News saying ICE should just GIVE UP if an illegal hides behind a door, says judicial warrants a non-starter "Apply LOGIC and REASON!" "They lock the door, what is ICE supposed to do?! 'Oh, gee whiz, they locked the door, guess we'll move on!'" 💯 "But Democrats want a new layer of warrant requirements, a judicial warrant on TOP of the immigration warrant. WE CAN'T DO THAT." "20 million illegals in 4 years...IMAGINE if we had to go through a judicial warrant!"

Eric Daugherty

129,460 views • 7 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents forced their way into a U.S. citizen’s home in Eagleville, Pennsylvania… holding the family at gunpoint… without presenting a judicial warrant. At the time of the confrontation, officials on scene said the agents did not have any type of warrant yet. Despite that, agents are seen breaking through a bedroom door with rifles drawn while a child is crying in the background. One agent then stands in the doorway with his weapon pointed inside as they search the home. Entering a private residence without a judge-signed warrant… or a real emergency… is exactly what the Fourth Amendment was written to prevent. And as much as DHS tries to claim, an internal immigration document is not a judicial warrant. And “we’ll get one later” does not give the government the right to point guns at a family inside their own home. If federal agents can surround a house, threaten forced entry, and go in before they even have legal authorization… Then the Constitution is being ignored. And if it can be ignored for one family, it can be ignored for anyone.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents forced their way into a U.S. citizen’s home in Eagleville, Pennsylvania… holding the family at gunpoint… without presenting a judicial warrant. At the time of the confrontation, officials on scene said the agents did not have any type of warrant yet. Despite that, agents are seen breaking through a bedroom door with rifles drawn while a child is crying in the background. One agent then stands in the doorway with his weapon pointed inside as they search the home. Entering a private residence without a judge-signed warrant… or a real emergency… is exactly what the Fourth Amendment was written to prevent. And as much as DHS tries to claim, an internal immigration document is not a judicial warrant. And “we’ll get one later” does not give the government the right to point guns at a family inside their own home. If federal agents can surround a house, threaten forced entry, and go in before they even have legal authorization… Then the Constitution is being ignored. And if it can be ignored for one family, it can be ignored for anyone.

Jesus Freakin Congress

539,007 views • 7 months ago

This is Chicago protesting Trump’s deployment of the National Guard! They don’t want them there because they aren’t needed.They’re also placing legal signs in the windows of private Businesses that warn ICE or BP agents not to enter without a signed Judicial warrant by a Judge!

This is Chicago protesting Trump’s deployment of the National Guard! They don’t want them there because they aren’t needed.They’re also placing legal signs in the windows of private Businesses that warn ICE or BP agents not to enter without a signed Judicial warrant by a Judge!

Suzie rizzio

111,793 views • 11 months ago

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents illegally smashed through the glass door of a locked auto body shop, without a warrant, to detain the shop owner and an employee, in West Valley City, Utah. Yes, agents are violating the Constitution all over the country, not just in Minnesota. In the video, two agents are already standing inside the body shop when the owner’s wife asks them the most basic, constitutionally required question, “Do you have a warrant?” …after they broke in. They illegally ignore her request and instead tell HER to stay back. She continues demanding to see a warrant. And then they say the quiet part out loud: “We don’t need one.” They absolutely do, which is exactly what she tells them. They continue ignoring her, after illegally breaking into a locked, private business, while ordering her to back up inside her own workplace. The agents then begin questioning the shop owner and an employee, despite not knowing their status, and having zero probable cause. She tells them, “My lawyer is coming, do you want to get sued?” And the agents laugh. Sit with that. Border Patrol agents force entry into a private business, without a warrant, and laugh about accountability. The agents admit on camera that they broke the glass door to enter the private property. She says that’s why you had to break in… “Because you don’t have a warrant!” And the agent says again: “It’s because we don’t need one.” They detain the shop owner and an employee anyway, after breaking in, without a warrant… despite both men having no criminal records. This is a blatant Fourth Amendment violation. A locked business is private property… where a warrant is not optional. If this is tolerated, it sets the precedent that federal agents can smash their way into ANY business, detain whoever they want, and disappear them. That is not law enforcement. That is an open assault on constitutional rights.

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents illegally smashed through the glass door of a locked auto body shop, without a warrant, to detain the shop owner and an employee, in West Valley City, Utah. Yes, agents are violating the Constitution all over the country, not just in Minnesota. In the video, two agents are already standing inside the body shop when the owner’s wife asks them the most basic, constitutionally required question, “Do you have a warrant?” …after they broke in. They illegally ignore her request and instead tell HER to stay back. She continues demanding to see a warrant. And then they say the quiet part out loud: “We don’t need one.” They absolutely do, which is exactly what she tells them. They continue ignoring her, after illegally breaking into a locked, private business, while ordering her to back up inside her own workplace. The agents then begin questioning the shop owner and an employee, despite not knowing their status, and having zero probable cause. She tells them, “My lawyer is coming, do you want to get sued?” And the agents laugh. Sit with that. Border Patrol agents force entry into a private business, without a warrant, and laugh about accountability. The agents admit on camera that they broke the glass door to enter the private property. She says that’s why you had to break in… “Because you don’t have a warrant!” And the agent says again: “It’s because we don’t need one.” They detain the shop owner and an employee anyway, after breaking in, without a warrant… despite both men having no criminal records. This is a blatant Fourth Amendment violation. A locked business is private property… where a warrant is not optional. If this is tolerated, it sets the precedent that federal agents can smash their way into ANY business, detain whoever they want, and disappear them. That is not law enforcement. That is an open assault on constitutional rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,217,082 views • 7 months ago

🚨ICE agents illegally threatened to tase a PASSENGER for refusing to exit a vehicle… after lying about having a warrant for him, in Lennox, California. In the video, the agents repeatedly insisted they had a warrant for the passenger, demanded he get out of the car, and threatened to tase him if he didn’t comply. But, when the passenger continued to ask to see the warrant, the agents suddenly asked for his ID. After running his identification, they decided to change the story… Agents then started asking the driver for their ID, despite admitting they did not know who they were dealing with. When questioned, one agent first claimed they had a warrant for the passenger, then admitted they were “writing it right now,” before finally acknowledging, “I thought it was you.” So, to break this all down… ICE agents threatened to tase someone over a warrant they didn’t have, for a person they hadn’t even identified. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. Government agents do not get to detain whoever they want, threaten force, demand identification from everyone present, and just figure out who they are dealing with later. Because that’s illegal. If ICE had a valid warrant, they should have been able to identify the subject of that warrant before threatening someone with a taser. And if they didn’t know who they were talking to… then what exactly was the legal basis for the detention, the threats, and the demands for identification? This is why people are outraged. And every time this behavior is excused, it sends the message that ICE agents can ignore constitutional rights, threaten innocent people, and walk away like nothing happened.

🚨ICE agents illegally threatened to tase a PASSENGER for refusing to exit a vehicle… after lying about having a warrant for him, in Lennox, California. In the video, the agents repeatedly insisted they had a warrant for the passenger, demanded he get out of the car, and threatened to tase him if he didn’t comply. But, when the passenger continued to ask to see the warrant, the agents suddenly asked for his ID. After running his identification, they decided to change the story… Agents then started asking the driver for their ID, despite admitting they did not know who they were dealing with. When questioned, one agent first claimed they had a warrant for the passenger, then admitted they were “writing it right now,” before finally acknowledging, “I thought it was you.” So, to break this all down… ICE agents threatened to tase someone over a warrant they didn’t have, for a person they hadn’t even identified. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. Government agents do not get to detain whoever they want, threaten force, demand identification from everyone present, and just figure out who they are dealing with later. Because that’s illegal. If ICE had a valid warrant, they should have been able to identify the subject of that warrant before threatening someone with a taser. And if they didn’t know who they were talking to… then what exactly was the legal basis for the detention, the threats, and the demands for identification? This is why people are outraged. And every time this behavior is excused, it sends the message that ICE agents can ignore constitutional rights, threaten innocent people, and walk away like nothing happened.

Jesus Freakin Congress

59,014 views • 2 months ago

🚨BREAKING: A manager at a local diner asked ICE agents for a warrant before they searched a private areas of the business… and their response… slamming him to the ground, and putting a knee in his back, leaving him injured. Because apparently exercising your constitutional rights is now being treated like obstruction. According to witnesses, ICE agents were chasing someone who ran into the restaurant after a traffic stop. The manager reportedly told them they could not just storm through the kitchen without judicial authorization. Because the Fourth Amendment is still a thing… even though ICE agents keep pretending it isn’t. Law enforcement cannot just search private areas of a business because they feel like it. A kitchen, in a restaurant, is not a public space. When agents do not have consent, exigent circumstances, or a valid warrant signed by a judge… then managers have every right to question that search. That is literally how constitutional protections work. And the fact that the manager was injured, after asserting those rights, should outrage everyone. Rights either apply to everyone… or they are not rights at all.

🚨BREAKING: A manager at a local diner asked ICE agents for a warrant before they searched a private areas of the business… and their response… slamming him to the ground, and putting a knee in his back, leaving him injured. Because apparently exercising your constitutional rights is now being treated like obstruction. According to witnesses, ICE agents were chasing someone who ran into the restaurant after a traffic stop. The manager reportedly told them they could not just storm through the kitchen without judicial authorization. Because the Fourth Amendment is still a thing… even though ICE agents keep pretending it isn’t. Law enforcement cannot just search private areas of a business because they feel like it. A kitchen, in a restaurant, is not a public space. When agents do not have consent, exigent circumstances, or a valid warrant signed by a judge… then managers have every right to question that search. That is literally how constitutional protections work. And the fact that the manager was injured, after asserting those rights, should outrage everyone. Rights either apply to everyone… or they are not rights at all.

Jesus Freakin Congress

283,013 views • 3 months ago

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents were caught attempting to force an arrest inside a private home… without a warrant. The video shows agents were already in someone’s front yard trying to detain a man. The homeowner comes out and tells them to leave, because they are on private property. The man they’re trying to detain is saying the same thing… you’re on private property… get out. Instead of backing off… an agent grabs him around the waist, trying to tackle the man. The man breaks free, crawling to the door, and goes inside the house. At that point, this should’ve been over. Because under the Constitution, entering a home without a warrant is one of the clearest lines law enforcement are not allowed to cross. But, they cross it anyway. One agent grabs his foot as he’s going in… and then both agents follow him inside the home, while the homeowner is actively telling them to get out. Over and over. This is exactly what the Supreme Court ruled against in Payton v. New York… law enforcement cannot enter a home to make an arrest without a warrant. And in Lange v. California… they made it clear you don’t get to chase someone into their home, for a non-serious offense, and call it “hot pursuit.” They were told to leave private property… and didn’t. They attempted a detention without respecting that boundary. And then forced their way into a home anyway. All without a warrant.

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents were caught attempting to force an arrest inside a private home… without a warrant. The video shows agents were already in someone’s front yard trying to detain a man. The homeowner comes out and tells them to leave, because they are on private property. The man they’re trying to detain is saying the same thing… you’re on private property… get out. Instead of backing off… an agent grabs him around the waist, trying to tackle the man. The man breaks free, crawling to the door, and goes inside the house. At that point, this should’ve been over. Because under the Constitution, entering a home without a warrant is one of the clearest lines law enforcement are not allowed to cross. But, they cross it anyway. One agent grabs his foot as he’s going in… and then both agents follow him inside the home, while the homeowner is actively telling them to get out. Over and over. This is exactly what the Supreme Court ruled against in Payton v. New York… law enforcement cannot enter a home to make an arrest without a warrant. And in Lange v. California… they made it clear you don’t get to chase someone into their home, for a non-serious offense, and call it “hot pursuit.” They were told to leave private property… and didn’t. They attempted a detention without respecting that boundary. And then forced their way into a home anyway. All without a warrant.

Jesus Freakin Congress

251,836 views • 5 months ago

He tells them, “GET THE FUCK OFF MY PROPERTY!” over and over. A man in Bryan, Texas discovers ICE on his private property without permission and without a judicial warrant. We asked Do they have to obey? Yes. The Fourth Amendment protects your home and your yard from government intrusion. Without a judicial warrant, your consent, or a recognized legal exception, federal agents do not have the right to remain on your property. Legally, you can tell ICE to “GET THE FUCK OFF MY PROPERTY!” PAXIS: Know your rights before they matter. Help keep it free:

He tells them, “GET THE FUCK OFF MY PROPERTY!” over and over. A man in Bryan, Texas discovers ICE on his private property without permission and without a judicial warrant. We asked Do they have to obey? Yes. The Fourth Amendment protects your home and your yard from government intrusion. Without a judicial warrant, your consent, or a recognized legal exception, federal agents do not have the right to remain on your property. Legally, you can tell ICE to “GET THE FUCK OFF MY PROPERTY!” PAXIS: Know your rights before they matter. Help keep it free:

Joe Walsh

152,100 views • 1 month ago

🚨BREAKING: in Chicago, ICE agents illegally entered Bridgeview courthouse, tackled and detained a man, and it all happened while Cook County deputies stood by and allowed it. Illinois law, and a Cook County court order says, federal agents are not allowed to make civil arrests inside courthouses unless they present a valid judicial warrant. According to the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, ICE agents claimed they had a warrant… but did not produce it. Despite that, they still entered the courthouse, handcuffed a man in the lobby, and removed him from the building. Then, in the video, a deputy is seen shaking hands with an ICE agent, after the arrest. And when the person filming questioned the legality of what just happened, another deputy shrugged, and said, “Isn’t being here illegally a crime?” Which… no. Being undocumented in the U.S. is not a criminal offense. But, besides that, instead of upholding the law, the sheriff just assumed… and potentially allowed a kidnapping to happen. The Public Defender’s office says no federal criminal charges have been identified, and the man was reportedly there for a deferred prosecution hearing. Earlier that same day, ICE also detained a woman, and a small child, outside the courthouse, which the Public Defender’s office called a clear violations of state law. So, the questions, everyone needs to be asking, are this… If there’s a law banning this, a court order banning this, and no warrant is even produced when asked… how is this still happening inside a courthouse? And why are the very people sworn to uphold the law, standing by while it happens?

🚨BREAKING: in Chicago, ICE agents illegally entered Bridgeview courthouse, tackled and detained a man, and it all happened while Cook County deputies stood by and allowed it. Illinois law, and a Cook County court order says, federal agents are not allowed to make civil arrests inside courthouses unless they present a valid judicial warrant. According to the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, ICE agents claimed they had a warrant… but did not produce it. Despite that, they still entered the courthouse, handcuffed a man in the lobby, and removed him from the building. Then, in the video, a deputy is seen shaking hands with an ICE agent, after the arrest. And when the person filming questioned the legality of what just happened, another deputy shrugged, and said, “Isn’t being here illegally a crime?” Which… no. Being undocumented in the U.S. is not a criminal offense. But, besides that, instead of upholding the law, the sheriff just assumed… and potentially allowed a kidnapping to happen. The Public Defender’s office says no federal criminal charges have been identified, and the man was reportedly there for a deferred prosecution hearing. Earlier that same day, ICE also detained a woman, and a small child, outside the courthouse, which the Public Defender’s office called a clear violations of state law. So, the questions, everyone needs to be asking, are this… If there’s a law banning this, a court order banning this, and no warrant is even produced when asked… how is this still happening inside a courthouse? And why are the very people sworn to uphold the law, standing by while it happens?

Jesus Freakin Congress

40,963 views • 2 months ago