Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Frictionless Private OTC Contracts The P-OTC system is built from the ground up for high-volume, permissioned, and impact-free trading. This video breaks down everything: from the backend mechanics driving the controller-switch architecture to the UX flow that makes private OTC trading seamless. No custodians, no middlemen, just smart contract...

FrictionlessX's profile picture

Frictionless

3,501 subscribers

12,778 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля john johnson
john johnson1 год назад

I'm stoked for the release. This is something I'll actually use. Decentralized OTC is going to be huge!

Фото профиля NICE
NICE1 год назад

Unlock customer loyalty with game-changing insights. Get insights from top CX analysts.

Фото профиля OmniShiftX
OmniShiftX1 год назад

$Fric is the next big thing

Фото профиля Oluwakayode🎖️
Oluwakayode🎖️1 год назад

This is absolutely awesome, great development 👌

Фото профиля Kiddwaya
Kiddwaya1 год назад

The video was made to break things to ease Enjoy the video and acquire the right information $FRIC

Фото профиля Doc_and_Stocks
Doc_and_Stocks1 год назад

$FRIC 💪

Фото профиля ✎ 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖉𝖊 𝖓𝖔𝖙 𝕰𝖉𝖓𝖚𝖙
✎ 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖉𝖊 𝖓𝖔𝖙 𝕰𝖉𝖓𝖚𝖙1 год назад

$Fric has the potential to become the next big project in crypto space, don’t miss out on this opportunity

Фото профиля Ade-bim-pe
Ade-bim-pe1 год назад

This system revolutionizes trading! Experience true privacy and control with seamless execution. Exciting times ahead $FRIC

Фото профиля ADEY CA$H🤑
ADEY CA$H🤑1 год назад

Get started with $fric guys don't miss out

Фото профиля Oluwasegun Joshua
Oluwasegun Joshua1 год назад

@FrictionlessX transparency is a key factor for you to know your are on the right path. #Defi with $Fric is Trades done right cuz you get the best from your Bag.

Фото профиля Sir Fortune
Sir Fortune1 год назад

$FRIC 🔥

Похожие видео

1️⃣ How Hypersurface Actually Works There has been increasing interest in how on-chain options liquidity is created and how Hypersurface operates under the hood. 👇 This post breaks down the mechanics. - 2️⃣ How options liquidity works in traditional markets In OTC options markets, liquidity is not passive. When a user sells an option, a desk takes the other side and replicates the payoff through delta hedging. This process requires collateral to secure the position and capital to hedge directional exposure. If the user does not provide collateral, the desk must source capital externally. That cost of capital is embedded into pricing. The result is wider spreads and lower premiums for the user. - 3️⃣ What Hypersurface changes Hypersurface removes the dependency on external desks. Liquidity is created directly within the protocol. Instead of routing flow to third parties, the system prices the option, takes the position, and hedges exposure programmatically. - 4️⃣ Execution and hedging When a position enters the system, the protocol computes the delta of the position and executes a corresponding hedge directly on Hyperliquid. This is not manual execution. It is deterministic and contract-driven. - 5️⃣ Why Hyperliquid matters This architecture is enabled by Hyperliquid’s core EVM integration. It allows smart contracts to execute trades directly on the exchange without transferring funds to externally controlled accounts. This removes a critical trust assumption present in most systems. - 6️⃣ Fund custody and control. User funds remain within smart contracts at all times. There is no transfer to team-controlled wallets, no manual custody layer, and no off-chain execution dependency. All actions, including hedging and settlement, are executed at the contract level. - 7️⃣ What this enables. By internalizing liquidity and automating hedging, the system achieves tighter pricing, improved capital efficiency, and scalability without solely relying on external market makers. Market makers can participate to improve the quote, but they have to compete with the protocol, which results in better, more reliable prices for users. - 8️⃣ Context. In traditional and CeFi systems, similar strategies exist. However, they rely on centralized exchanges, custodial execution, and off-chain coordination. Hypersurface replicates these mechanics on-chain with reduced trust assumptions and full transparency. - 9️⃣ Conclusion. Liquidity is created within the protocol. Exposure is hedged programmatically. Funds remain in smart contracts. No intermediaries. No manual execution. This is how on-chain options infrastructure scales. - Join the Hypersurface community on Telegram or Discord! 📎 📎
1:18

1️⃣ How Hypersurface Actually Works There has been increasing interest in how on-chain options liquidity is created and how Hypersurface operates under the hood. 👇 This post breaks down the mechanics. - 2️⃣ How options liquidity works in traditional markets In OTC options markets, liquidity is not passive. When a user sells an option, a desk takes the other side and replicates the payoff through delta hedging. This process requires collateral to secure the position and capital to hedge directional exposure. If the user does not provide collateral, the desk must source capital externally. That cost of capital is embedded into pricing. The result is wider spreads and lower premiums for the user. - 3️⃣ What Hypersurface changes Hypersurface removes the dependency on external desks. Liquidity is created directly within the protocol. Instead of routing flow to third parties, the system prices the option, takes the position, and hedges exposure programmatically. - 4️⃣ Execution and hedging When a position enters the system, the protocol computes the delta of the position and executes a corresponding hedge directly on Hyperliquid. This is not manual execution. It is deterministic and contract-driven. - 5️⃣ Why Hyperliquid matters This architecture is enabled by Hyperliquid’s core EVM integration. It allows smart contracts to execute trades directly on the exchange without transferring funds to externally controlled accounts. This removes a critical trust assumption present in most systems. - 6️⃣ Fund custody and control. User funds remain within smart contracts at all times. There is no transfer to team-controlled wallets, no manual custody layer, and no off-chain execution dependency. All actions, including hedging and settlement, are executed at the contract level. - 7️⃣ What this enables. By internalizing liquidity and automating hedging, the system achieves tighter pricing, improved capital efficiency, and scalability without solely relying on external market makers. Market makers can participate to improve the quote, but they have to compete with the protocol, which results in better, more reliable prices for users. - 8️⃣ Context. In traditional and CeFi systems, similar strategies exist. However, they rely on centralized exchanges, custodial execution, and off-chain coordination. Hypersurface replicates these mechanics on-chain with reduced trust assumptions and full transparency. - 9️⃣ Conclusion. Liquidity is created within the protocol. Exposure is hedged programmatically. Funds remain in smart contracts. No intermediaries. No manual execution. This is how on-chain options infrastructure scales. - Join the Hypersurface community on Telegram or Discord! 📎 📎

Hypersurface

15,206 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

GM builders 🟦 Big shift happening right now. Base is evolving… and Base App is leading the charge. From social-first → trading-first. This isn’t just a feature update, it’s a complete change in direction for the onchain economy. For months, social fueled attention. Creators earned. Communities grew. Narratives formed. Now? That attention is turning into liquidity. Every creator coin, every meme, every AI narrative is about to plug directly into a trading engine. What this means: • Faster discovery → instant trading • Attention → real market value • Creators → become liquidity drivers • Users → move from scrolling to trading The lines between content, culture, and capital are disappearing. This is how ecosystems mature. This is how onchain wins. Watch the video 👇 and see why this changes everything. Tagging the builders: Base Baseapp
1:29

GM builders 🟦 Big shift happening right now. Base is evolving… and Base App is leading the charge. From social-first → trading-first. This isn’t just a feature update, it’s a complete change in direction for the onchain economy. For months, social fueled attention. Creators earned. Communities grew. Narratives formed. Now? That attention is turning into liquidity. Every creator coin, every meme, every AI narrative is about to plug directly into a trading engine. What this means: • Faster discovery → instant trading • Attention → real market value • Creators → become liquidity drivers • Users → move from scrolling to trading The lines between content, culture, and capital are disappearing. This is how ecosystems mature. This is how onchain wins. Watch the video 👇 and see why this changes everything. Tagging the builders: Base Baseapp

𝙼𝙰𝚉𝙸 𝙴𝙼𝙾𝙽𝙸𝙴 ™LOFTE3 2026

11,589 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The problem: Blockchains lack privacy by default. Their transparency enhances trust, but for institutions managing proprietary strategies and sensitive client information, it’s a major barrier to large-scale adoption. The solution: The Chainlink privacy standard enables private smart contracts at scale on any blockchain. How it works: Computations run in trusted execution environments (TEEs) to achieve privacy and high performance, while decentralized oracle networks and advanced cryptographic techniques provide enhanced security. This ensures sensitive data and business logic remain fully confidential while still having verifiability that all actions were executed exactly as intended. The result: Privacy is enabled. Trust is preserved. Scale is achieved. Just use Chainlink.
1:17

The problem: Blockchains lack privacy by default. Their transparency enhances trust, but for institutions managing proprietary strategies and sensitive client information, it’s a major barrier to large-scale adoption. The solution: The Chainlink privacy standard enables private smart contracts at scale on any blockchain. How it works: Computations run in trusted execution environments (TEEs) to achieve privacy and high performance, while decentralized oracle networks and advanced cryptographic techniques provide enhanced security. This ensures sensitive data and business logic remain fully confidential while still having verifiability that all actions were executed exactly as intended. The result: Privacy is enabled. Trust is preserved. Scale is achieved. Just use Chainlink.

Chainlink

34,918 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

In this GM Podcast episode, Genzio Founder and CEO, Zack Nelson (Zack @ Genzio), chats with John Patrick Mullin (JP Mullin (🕉, 🏘️)), Co-Founder & CEO of MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs, to dive into the recent events surrounding Mantra, the impact of the OM token crash, and the allegations of price manipulation and insider control. 02:08 - How Did the Crash Happen? 07:47 - Addressing Circulating Supply Misconceptions 12:10 - Response to Thin Liquidity Claims 17:10 - What Caused the Liquidations? 18:59 - Ensuring Fairness in Airdrop Distribution 22:40 - Verifying Organic Userbase Growth 26:52 - Loan vs Retainer Model 30:18 - Incentives for the Loan Model 31:05 - Is There an Underlying Mutual Goal for Market Makers? 32:27 - Was a Market Maker Responsible? 32:44 - Laser Digital’s Role 35:58 - Sustainability of Reinjection Model 38:24 - Concerns About Buybacks and Potential Leverage from OTC Deals 39:37 - When Can Investors Sell? 42:45 - Reconciling the Narrative vs Fundamentals with Great User Activity 45:19 - Plan to Add Real Dollars to Treasury 48:39 - Buyback Duration and Impact 50:31 - Identity of the Big OTC Seller 52:29 - Why the OTC Sellers Moved Quickly 54:36 - Origin of the Claims 56:20 - Who Is to Blame? Watch the full episode below!
1:00:20

In this GM Podcast episode, Genzio Founder and CEO, Zack Nelson (Zack @ Genzio), chats with John Patrick Mullin (JP Mullin (🕉, 🏘️)), Co-Founder & CEO of MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs, to dive into the recent events surrounding Mantra, the impact of the OM token crash, and the allegations of price manipulation and insider control. 02:08 - How Did the Crash Happen? 07:47 - Addressing Circulating Supply Misconceptions 12:10 - Response to Thin Liquidity Claims 17:10 - What Caused the Liquidations? 18:59 - Ensuring Fairness in Airdrop Distribution 22:40 - Verifying Organic Userbase Growth 26:52 - Loan vs Retainer Model 30:18 - Incentives for the Loan Model 31:05 - Is There an Underlying Mutual Goal for Market Makers? 32:27 - Was a Market Maker Responsible? 32:44 - Laser Digital’s Role 35:58 - Sustainability of Reinjection Model 38:24 - Concerns About Buybacks and Potential Leverage from OTC Deals 39:37 - When Can Investors Sell? 42:45 - Reconciling the Narrative vs Fundamentals with Great User Activity 45:19 - Plan to Add Real Dollars to Treasury 48:39 - Buyback Duration and Impact 50:31 - Identity of the Big OTC Seller 52:29 - Why the OTC Sellers Moved Quickly 54:36 - Origin of the Claims 56:20 - Who Is to Blame? Watch the full episode below!

Genzio Media

336,307 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Constipated." That is the word now being used for the private credit market. And it is exactly what this looks like. The private credit story is changing. For months it was framed as a liquidity problem. Investors trying to pull their money out. That is still a huge problem. BlackRock just had a couple of funds suffering big runs. But there is a bigger one. It is no longer just the investors who want out. It is the investors outside who no longer want in. And that is the much bigger story. Because the private credit boom was built on flows. Constant inflows from wealth managers, pensions, insurance companies, and the general public. That is how big it got. The machine has to keep moving. Money comes in. Loans get made. Funds grow. Redemptions get handled. Managers collect their fees. Everyone pretends it is calm because the marks are smooth and the exits are limited. Now the machine is reversing. Reuters reported US direct lending issuance in the three months ending May was down roughly 40% from the first quarter. Issuance to private-equity-backed borrowers dropped nearly 37%. Volume tied to leveraged buyouts fell about 34%. So this is no longer just a redemption story. The exits are clogged. New money is hesitant. Sellers will not cut prices, and buyers will not pay yesterday's valuations. Credit funds are handling redemptions. Leveraged loans are showing strain. And publicly traded BDCs are not rebounding, even as the broader market soars. So the question is no longer whether investors are still withdrawing. They are, and it is accelerating. It is not about the people inside who want out. It is about the people outside who no longer want in. That is the bigger problem. It pushes us deeper into stage two, and the odds of stage three go up from here.
2:11

"Constipated." That is the word now being used for the private credit market. And it is exactly what this looks like. The private credit story is changing. For months it was framed as a liquidity problem. Investors trying to pull their money out. That is still a huge problem. BlackRock just had a couple of funds suffering big runs. But there is a bigger one. It is no longer just the investors who want out. It is the investors outside who no longer want in. And that is the much bigger story. Because the private credit boom was built on flows. Constant inflows from wealth managers, pensions, insurance companies, and the general public. That is how big it got. The machine has to keep moving. Money comes in. Loans get made. Funds grow. Redemptions get handled. Managers collect their fees. Everyone pretends it is calm because the marks are smooth and the exits are limited. Now the machine is reversing. Reuters reported US direct lending issuance in the three months ending May was down roughly 40% from the first quarter. Issuance to private-equity-backed borrowers dropped nearly 37%. Volume tied to leveraged buyouts fell about 34%. So this is no longer just a redemption story. The exits are clogged. New money is hesitant. Sellers will not cut prices, and buyers will not pay yesterday's valuations. Credit funds are handling redemptions. Leveraged loans are showing strain. And publicly traded BDCs are not rebounding, even as the broader market soars. So the question is no longer whether investors are still withdrawing. They are, and it is accelerating. It is not about the people inside who want out. It is about the people outside who no longer want in. That is the bigger problem. It pushes us deeper into stage two, and the odds of stage three go up from here.

Jeffrey P. Snider

24,551 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

China’s Debt Bomb Is About to Explode – The End of the Chinese Yuan. China’s financial system is on the brink of disaster. In this video, I break down how Beijing’s hidden debt, fake GDP numbers, and maxed-out national credit card are driving the Chinese RMB toward total collapse. From unpaid pensions to collapsing real estate, this isn’t just an economic story — it’s a ticking time bomb that will impact the entire world. Watch until the end to see why inflation is the CCP’s last and most dangerous move.
15:02

China’s Debt Bomb Is About to Explode – The End of the Chinese Yuan. China’s financial system is on the brink of disaster. In this video, I break down how Beijing’s hidden debt, fake GDP numbers, and maxed-out national credit card are driving the Chinese RMB toward total collapse. From unpaid pensions to collapsing real estate, this isn’t just an economic story — it’s a ticking time bomb that will impact the entire world. Watch until the end to see why inflation is the CCP’s last and most dangerous move.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

42,304 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

📣 Community Update: Cyborgs! We’ve just reached a major milestone that signals a clear shift in what Arcane and Spectre are becoming, and where this project is heading. Arcane is no longer just a wallet. It’s evolving into the foundation for on-chain privacy. With the Arcane wallet extension now complete, alongside a working privacy dApp interacting directly through the SDK, we’re seeing the first fully connected version of this system come to life. 📌 The wallet extension introduces a real user interface across desktop, complementing mobile, and bringing Arcane into everyday use rather than remaining purely backend infrastructure. Public release by the end of Q2. 📌 Arcane now supports both public and private transactions seamlessly, with Invisible Routing automatically detecting the transaction type so the user doesn’t need to think about it. 📌 The integration between the wallet and the dApp via the SDK creates a complete flow from wallet > action > private execution. This is live, functional privacy in action, not just theory. 📌 The Arcane SDK is a major unlock. It allows any dApp on EVM compatible chains to integrate our privacy stack, positioning Arcane as infrastructure rather than a single product. 📌 Our relayer network will power all private transactions, not only within the Arcane wallet, but across every third party application that integrates the SDK. 📌 As more integrations come online, this drives increased volume through the ecosystem, expanding the revenue streams flowing back to holders. What we’re seeing now is the early formation of a connected ecosystem, where wallet, SDK, dApps, and relayers all work together as one unified privacy layer. This marks the transition from isolated development into something functional and expandable. The rails are being laid. The system is coming online. And what we’re building here doesn’t just participate in the future of crypto, it helps define it ♾️🚀
1:00

📣 Community Update: Cyborgs! We’ve just reached a major milestone that signals a clear shift in what Arcane and Spectre are becoming, and where this project is heading. Arcane is no longer just a wallet. It’s evolving into the foundation for on-chain privacy. With the Arcane wallet extension now complete, alongside a working privacy dApp interacting directly through the SDK, we’re seeing the first fully connected version of this system come to life. 📌 The wallet extension introduces a real user interface across desktop, complementing mobile, and bringing Arcane into everyday use rather than remaining purely backend infrastructure. Public release by the end of Q2. 📌 Arcane now supports both public and private transactions seamlessly, with Invisible Routing automatically detecting the transaction type so the user doesn’t need to think about it. 📌 The integration between the wallet and the dApp via the SDK creates a complete flow from wallet > action > private execution. This is live, functional privacy in action, not just theory. 📌 The Arcane SDK is a major unlock. It allows any dApp on EVM compatible chains to integrate our privacy stack, positioning Arcane as infrastructure rather than a single product. 📌 Our relayer network will power all private transactions, not only within the Arcane wallet, but across every third party application that integrates the SDK. 📌 As more integrations come online, this drives increased volume through the ecosystem, expanding the revenue streams flowing back to holders. What we’re seeing now is the early formation of a connected ecosystem, where wallet, SDK, dApps, and relayers all work together as one unified privacy layer. This marks the transition from isolated development into something functional and expandable. The rails are being laid. The system is coming online. And what we’re building here doesn’t just participate in the future of crypto, it helps define it ♾️🚀

0x0

10,476 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Polymarket front run bot Spent the last month building the backend for this bot which essentially acts the same way that high frequency trading bots work in the stock market It waits for a market buy order to come through where there is thin liquidity in the order book meaning their market buy will push the price up of a YES/NO contract meaning that if my bot buys the contracts first then I can sell them at the high price to the market buy order before their orders have gone through Prediction markets are still early enough to find opportunities like this, just like how the early days of stock trading similar bots to this were invented It is essentially an arbitrage strategy, will make the bot public and free to a few people tomorrow so turn on notifications so you don’t miss it
1:54

Polymarket front run bot Spent the last month building the backend for this bot which essentially acts the same way that high frequency trading bots work in the stock market It waits for a market buy order to come through where there is thin liquidity in the order book meaning their market buy will push the price up of a YES/NO contract meaning that if my bot buys the contracts first then I can sell them at the high price to the market buy order before their orders have gone through Prediction markets are still early enough to find opportunities like this, just like how the early days of stock trading similar bots to this were invented It is essentially an arbitrage strategy, will make the bot public and free to a few people tomorrow so turn on notifications so you don’t miss it

Ethan

71,943 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I tried to open a simple trade the other day. Moved funds… swapped an asset… realized I had to bridge again before I could even trade perps. By the end, I’d hopped across three platforms and paid fees three times. And I just sat there thinking… there has to be a better way. That’s when I found Xyra Labs. It’s not just another DeFi app … it’s building a cross-chain super-app designed to make trading seamless, efficient, and human. Here’s what stood out: ➤ Seamless swaps across 9+ EVM & non-EVM chains with Split Routing for CEX-level pricing and low slippage ➤ Perp futures via Xyra Perps: on-chain CLOB trading, gasless transfers, and keyless smart accounts ➤ Borderless liquidity: bridge assets across chains effortlessly for unified DeFi ➤ The future: Perps V2 with cross-chain deposits, cross-margin trades, higher leverage, and new markets Trading here finally feels smooth. No extra confirmations, no juggling chains, no friction .. just execution. If DeFi is about efficiency, capital, and speed, Xyra Labs is building the infrastructure that actually delivers. Try it yourself ➥ Wizz
2:26

I tried to open a simple trade the other day. Moved funds… swapped an asset… realized I had to bridge again before I could even trade perps. By the end, I’d hopped across three platforms and paid fees three times. And I just sat there thinking… there has to be a better way. That’s when I found Xyra Labs. It’s not just another DeFi app … it’s building a cross-chain super-app designed to make trading seamless, efficient, and human. Here’s what stood out: ➤ Seamless swaps across 9+ EVM & non-EVM chains with Split Routing for CEX-level pricing and low slippage ➤ Perp futures via Xyra Perps: on-chain CLOB trading, gasless transfers, and keyless smart accounts ➤ Borderless liquidity: bridge assets across chains effortlessly for unified DeFi ➤ The future: Perps V2 with cross-chain deposits, cross-margin trades, higher leverage, and new markets Trading here finally feels smooth. No extra confirmations, no juggling chains, no friction .. just execution. If DeFi is about efficiency, capital, and speed, Xyra Labs is building the infrastructure that actually delivers. Try it yourself ➥ Wizz

𝓣𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪

35,652 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Dark Pool Demo now LIVE on Public Testnet. For the first time ever, you can privately trade on Solana. Private trading venues are what dark pools are. They don't show orders publicly. makes private, onchain trading possible. No MEV. No frontrunning. No quote fading. Just trustless, encrypted execution. How to Interact with the Demo: • Get some devnet SOL on or • Connect wallet to • Start trading. All tokens are simulated, no real money involved. In case you spot a "book full" error, try placing orders on the opposite side (buy/sell) as order book depth is limited at this point adov ☂️ also dropped a rock-paper-scissors dApp on . Totally private and Operates on Solana devnet Here's my Take: • Claiming devnet SOL was tough in the beginning (shoutout roti ☂️ for assistance), however the faucet now functions. • Some delay in tx approval, but UX is much improved now. Nice to see encrypted compute working at last. Give the tech a stress test. gMPC ☂️
0:23

Dark Pool Demo now LIVE on Public Testnet. For the first time ever, you can privately trade on Solana. Private trading venues are what dark pools are. They don't show orders publicly. makes private, onchain trading possible. No MEV. No frontrunning. No quote fading. Just trustless, encrypted execution. How to Interact with the Demo: • Get some devnet SOL on or • Connect wallet to • Start trading. All tokens are simulated, no real money involved. In case you spot a "book full" error, try placing orders on the opposite side (buy/sell) as order book depth is limited at this point adov ☂️ also dropped a rock-paper-scissors dApp on . Totally private and Operates on Solana devnet Here's my Take: • Claiming devnet SOL was tough in the beginning (shoutout roti ☂️ for assistance), however the faucet now functions. • Some delay in tx approval, but UX is much improved now. Nice to see encrypted compute working at last. Give the tech a stress test. gMPC ☂️

Donalds

30,111 просмотров • 1 год назад

The WEF isn’t satisfied controlling your energy, food, and money—now they’re coming for water. Gim Huay Neo, WEF Managing Director, spins this as "valuing water as a global common good"—but let’s translate the elitist doublespeak: 🔹 "Sustainable management" = Corporate-controlled water rights 🔹 "Equitable allocation" = Rationing under a carbon-credit-style scheme 🔹 "Public-private partnerships" = Selling nature itself to BlackRock & friends They claim it’s about "saving the planet," but the real plan is clear: 1. Monetize every drop through trading schemes (just like carbon credits). 2. Restrict usage via IoT "smart meters" (you’ll beg for a permit to water your garden). 3. Punish "overconsumption" while elites fill their pools & golf courses. The same people who fly private to Davos will shame you for "wasting" water. The same system that bailed out banks now wants to financialize the essence of life itself. This isn’t environmentalism—it’s feudalism with a green mask.
0:34

The WEF isn’t satisfied controlling your energy, food, and money—now they’re coming for water. Gim Huay Neo, WEF Managing Director, spins this as "valuing water as a global common good"—but let’s translate the elitist doublespeak: 🔹 "Sustainable management" = Corporate-controlled water rights 🔹 "Equitable allocation" = Rationing under a carbon-credit-style scheme 🔹 "Public-private partnerships" = Selling nature itself to BlackRock & friends They claim it’s about "saving the planet," but the real plan is clear: 1. Monetize every drop through trading schemes (just like carbon credits). 2. Restrict usage via IoT "smart meters" (you’ll beg for a permit to water your garden). 3. Punish "overconsumption" while elites fill their pools & golf courses. The same people who fly private to Davos will shame you for "wasting" water. The same system that bailed out banks now wants to financialize the essence of life itself. This isn’t environmentalism—it’s feudalism with a green mask.

Camus

37,651 просмотров • 1 год назад

Relay changes everything about building with AI. One single API key. Instantly switch between Claude for scripts, FLUX for stills, Kling for video, and MiniMax. No new accounts. No setup. No breaks in flow. Just change the model name and keep creating. Most see cheaper inference. The real advantage is zero friction; you stay in the zone the entire time. Neo, our AI agent, proved it: he built his own time travel video using the full Relay platform. ❤️ This is what seamless creation feels like. The video is fully automated by Neo using our Relay platform. He made all the scenes, music, and voice, scripted by himself. A bit rough around the edges, but he will get better. Build without limits. open-gpu:native
1:12

Relay changes everything about building with AI. One single API key. Instantly switch between Claude for scripts, FLUX for stills, Kling for video, and MiniMax. No new accounts. No setup. No breaks in flow. Just change the model name and keep creating. Most see cheaper inference. The real advantage is zero friction; you stay in the zone the entire time. Neo, our AI agent, proved it: he built his own time travel video using the full Relay platform. ❤️ This is what seamless creation feels like. The video is fully automated by Neo using our Relay platform. He made all the scenes, music, and voice, scripted by himself. A bit rough around the edges, but he will get better. Build without limits. open-gpu:native

OpenGPU Network

473,452 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I think I just stumbled onto the next thing everyone in crypto is about to talk about. It’s called Catapult, and it’s building an all-in-one toolset for token launches and trading on HyperEVM. I’ve been poking around their Turbo mode and the upcoming Hyper mode—and honestly, I’m shocked at how different this feels from the usual “spin up liquidity, pray for volume” routine. Here’s what grabbed me first: with Catapult Turbo, you can launch a token with zero upfront liquidity. You pay $10, hit launch, and you can earn from trading volume right away. Pricing runs on provably fair math, so the mechanics aren’t a black box. And here’s the twist I didn’t expect: top-performing tokens by volume will graduate to real LPs. In other words, if your token actually moves, Catapult helps it level up into a proper liquidity pool. That’s such a clean incentive loop. And then there’s Catapult Hyper. From what I’ve seen, it’s aiming to challenge the status quo for launchpads entirely—new liquidity mechanism, built-in incentives, a reworked bonding process, and multichain out of the gate. If Turbo is the spark, Hyper looks like the accelerant. Why I think people will be all over this soon: I’m seeing the early buzz already creators love the “no liquidity, no upfront cost” angle. No skewed odds: the design aims to reduce lopsided chances and give more tokens a real shot at upside. Aligned incentives: creators get 0.5% of token volume, and there’s a 10% referral revenue share. If you’re building or shilling, that’s meaningful. If you’ve ever hesitated to launch because funding liquidity felt like a cliff—same. That’s why Turbo surprised me. It’s simple, cheap, and actually gives you a path from launch to volume to real LP. TL;DR (and why I’m excited): TURBO is live: launch a token for $10, no upfront liquidity, earn from volume. Fair pricing via GMB; top tokens graduate to LPs. Creator rewards: 0.5% of volume + 10% referral revenue. HYPER: a reimagined launchpad with new liquidity mechanics and built-in incentives. I’m calling it now: this model is going to be everywhere in a minute. If you’re curious or ready to launch get in early and lock your spot. 🔗 Join here 👉
6:17

I think I just stumbled onto the next thing everyone in crypto is about to talk about. It’s called Catapult, and it’s building an all-in-one toolset for token launches and trading on HyperEVM. I’ve been poking around their Turbo mode and the upcoming Hyper mode—and honestly, I’m shocked at how different this feels from the usual “spin up liquidity, pray for volume” routine. Here’s what grabbed me first: with Catapult Turbo, you can launch a token with zero upfront liquidity. You pay $10, hit launch, and you can earn from trading volume right away. Pricing runs on provably fair math, so the mechanics aren’t a black box. And here’s the twist I didn’t expect: top-performing tokens by volume will graduate to real LPs. In other words, if your token actually moves, Catapult helps it level up into a proper liquidity pool. That’s such a clean incentive loop. And then there’s Catapult Hyper. From what I’ve seen, it’s aiming to challenge the status quo for launchpads entirely—new liquidity mechanism, built-in incentives, a reworked bonding process, and multichain out of the gate. If Turbo is the spark, Hyper looks like the accelerant. Why I think people will be all over this soon: I’m seeing the early buzz already creators love the “no liquidity, no upfront cost” angle. No skewed odds: the design aims to reduce lopsided chances and give more tokens a real shot at upside. Aligned incentives: creators get 0.5% of token volume, and there’s a 10% referral revenue share. If you’re building or shilling, that’s meaningful. If you’ve ever hesitated to launch because funding liquidity felt like a cliff—same. That’s why Turbo surprised me. It’s simple, cheap, and actually gives you a path from launch to volume to real LP. TL;DR (and why I’m excited): TURBO is live: launch a token for $10, no upfront liquidity, earn from volume. Fair pricing via GMB; top tokens graduate to LPs. Creator rewards: 0.5% of volume + 10% referral revenue. HYPER: a reimagined launchpad with new liquidity mechanics and built-in incentives. I’m calling it now: this model is going to be everywhere in a minute. If you’re curious or ready to launch get in early and lock your spot. 🔗 Join here 👉

Lunix

15,396 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

GMiden everyone 🤟 In finance, one rule always holds: a business is only as secure as the data behind it. So when the Miden team talks about Practical Private Finance, its not marketing - its a new on-chain model that finally works in real-world conditions. What’s the core idea behind Miden approach? The breakthrough is client-side proving: all computation happens on the users device. Your phone or laptop generates a local ZK-STARK proof, and the network verifies only correctnes. No exposed balances, no leaked strategies, no unnecessary risks. The chain sees the proof, but never your local state. That’s what practical privacy looks like. This is the kind of privacy blockchains should have offered to banks, brokers, trading platforms, and institutions yaers ago. And now it becomes real: private smart contracts, private execution, full control over state, fast performance, and programmable confidentiality - all without sacrificing speed or scalability. Practical Private Finance from Miden isnt a plug-in on top of the EVM. Its a new financial architecture where offchain data, proof-based validation, and compliance-ready design work as a unified system. This is how on-chain finally returns to sanity where trust isnt a slogan, but cryptography. And that’s exactly what inspired todays non NFT crypto art with my unofficial Miden mascot. The art itself in good quality is in the quote under this postHope you enjoy it )) #Miden #ClientSideProving
0:45

GMiden everyone 🤟 In finance, one rule always holds: a business is only as secure as the data behind it. So when the Miden team talks about Practical Private Finance, its not marketing - its a new on-chain model that finally works in real-world conditions. What’s the core idea behind Miden approach? The breakthrough is client-side proving: all computation happens on the users device. Your phone or laptop generates a local ZK-STARK proof, and the network verifies only correctnes. No exposed balances, no leaked strategies, no unnecessary risks. The chain sees the proof, but never your local state. That’s what practical privacy looks like. This is the kind of privacy blockchains should have offered to banks, brokers, trading platforms, and institutions yaers ago. And now it becomes real: private smart contracts, private execution, full control over state, fast performance, and programmable confidentiality - all without sacrificing speed or scalability. Practical Private Finance from Miden isnt a plug-in on top of the EVM. Its a new financial architecture where offchain data, proof-based validation, and compliance-ready design work as a unified system. This is how on-chain finally returns to sanity where trust isnt a slogan, but cryptography. And that’s exactly what inspired todays non NFT crypto art with my unofficial Miden mascot. The art itself in good quality is in the quote under this postHope you enjoy it )) #Miden #ClientSideProving

Konstantin

14,537 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

What was just said here is not only unbelievably uninformed… it’s dangerous misinformation for newer investors trying to understand how digital asset infrastructure actually works. “These companies fund themselves by dumping tokens” “Just buy the shares instead” “XRP has no reason to exist” Ripple is a PRIVATE company. XRP is an OPEN digital asset used for liquidity and settlement.. these are not the same thing. You cannot replace a neutral bridge asset with private equity shares. That makes absolutely no sense from a settlement and interoperability perspective. This is the equivalent of saying.. “Why use the internet? Just buy shares of Cisco” the craziest part is.. this misinformation is coming from individuals who many people already consider among the LEAST trustworthy voices in crypto.. Both know and proven scammers in the community. But if after all these years you still cannot separate: Ripple the company from XRP the asset… you should probably stop pretending to educate people on this topic.
1:06

What was just said here is not only unbelievably uninformed… it’s dangerous misinformation for newer investors trying to understand how digital asset infrastructure actually works. “These companies fund themselves by dumping tokens” “Just buy the shares instead” “XRP has no reason to exist” Ripple is a PRIVATE company. XRP is an OPEN digital asset used for liquidity and settlement.. these are not the same thing. You cannot replace a neutral bridge asset with private equity shares. That makes absolutely no sense from a settlement and interoperability perspective. This is the equivalent of saying.. “Why use the internet? Just buy shares of Cisco” the craziest part is.. this misinformation is coming from individuals who many people already consider among the LEAST trustworthy voices in crypto.. Both know and proven scammers in the community. But if after all these years you still cannot separate: Ripple the company from XRP the asset… you should probably stop pretending to educate people on this topic.

𝟸𝟺𝙷𝚁𝚂𝙲𝚁𝚈𝙿𝚃𝙾

15,203 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.
0:24

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.

X Finance Bull

16,025 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Cooperator number two admitted that he never heard it direct from Durk about the bounty, and in fact, he didn’t even know who the person who told him heard it from from. He also admitted that as to the 3 private conversation conversations he had afterward with Durk trying to get the money, there is absolutely no video and no corroborating Witness for any of those conversations. Those conversations all happened at essentially what was the after party for concerts at the United Center which are major events where it’s hard to see how you get so many private conversations with the person who you had no private relationship with, for whom you never had their phone number, and it goes on and on. When you couple the admissions with the cooperator statement that he was facing life without parole and cooperation is the only way to get a sentence reduction, you have a great argument at closing that this Witness does not bring the government closer to proving the conspiracy as against Durk Banks as much as he is saying things that get him a sentence reduction, but are impossible to corroborate. Doing that on a cross while also setting yourself up for the next cross which is coming up and is gonna be the one that matters, that’s a pretty good days work from the billion dollar lawyer
3:03

Cooperator number two admitted that he never heard it direct from Durk about the bounty, and in fact, he didn’t even know who the person who told him heard it from from. He also admitted that as to the 3 private conversation conversations he had afterward with Durk trying to get the money, there is absolutely no video and no corroborating Witness for any of those conversations. Those conversations all happened at essentially what was the after party for concerts at the United Center which are major events where it’s hard to see how you get so many private conversations with the person who you had no private relationship with, for whom you never had their phone number, and it goes on and on. When you couple the admissions with the cooperator statement that he was facing life without parole and cooperation is the only way to get a sentence reduction, you have a great argument at closing that this Witness does not bring the government closer to proving the conspiracy as against Durk Banks as much as he is saying things that get him a sentence reduction, but are impossible to corroborate. Doing that on a cross while also setting yourself up for the next cross which is coming up and is gonna be the one that matters, that’s a pretty good days work from the billion dollar lawyer

Mohammed (Moe) Gangat

118,554 просмотров • 26 дней назад

David Sacks: The biggest lie in this whole debate is calling it a “one-time tax.” There is nothing in the ballot language that guarantees it will never happen again. They’re not writing it into the constitution. This isn’t a one-time tax — it’s the first of many. The real goal is to establish a precedent — They keep minimizing it — “one percent, one time.” That’s intentional. They know the real value isn’t the money today, it’s the precedent. Once the government proves it can confiscate private property from a politically unpopular group, it will be replicated over and over again. Today they say “billionaires.” Tomorrow the line comes way down — because there’s not enough money. This has never been about billionaires. It’s about creating a system where the government decides who gets to keep their property — They say it’s “just the tip of the pinky.” But that’s how it always starts. Not the fist — just the pinky. The whole point is to normalize asset seizures so that all property is effectively owned by the government, subject to political approval. This is why democracy has limits. It can’t be two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner. People have rights. And once you allow the majority to vote away private property, you don’t have rights anymore — you have permissions.
2:07

David Sacks: The biggest lie in this whole debate is calling it a “one-time tax.” There is nothing in the ballot language that guarantees it will never happen again. They’re not writing it into the constitution. This isn’t a one-time tax — it’s the first of many. The real goal is to establish a precedent — They keep minimizing it — “one percent, one time.” That’s intentional. They know the real value isn’t the money today, it’s the precedent. Once the government proves it can confiscate private property from a politically unpopular group, it will be replicated over and over again. Today they say “billionaires.” Tomorrow the line comes way down — because there’s not enough money. This has never been about billionaires. It’s about creating a system where the government decides who gets to keep their property — They say it’s “just the tip of the pinky.” But that’s how it always starts. Not the fist — just the pinky. The whole point is to normalize asset seizures so that all property is effectively owned by the government, subject to political approval. This is why democracy has limits. It can’t be two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner. People have rights. And once you allow the majority to vote away private property, you don’t have rights anymore — you have permissions.

Ian Miles Cheong

128,372 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад