Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 FSD Is Still a Long Way From Becoming a Commodity! Jo Bhakdi thinks people are getting way ahead of themselves when they say self-driving tech will eventually become interchangeable. If autonomy were that easy to copy, we’d probably have a lot more Teslas and Waymos by now. And...

10,837 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля 1/100,000th
1/100,000th1 день назад

@JOBhakdi the irony the longer it takes Tesla to roll out, the larger the moat, and the more valuable Tesla is

Фото профиля hybridcarguy
hybridcarguy1 день назад

@JOBhakdi Funny how you guys go on and on about this whole thing while robotaxis are at the science experiment stage with 0 guidance, 0 timeline, 0 revenue… Get real!

Фото профиля 💧🌞John Troughton
💧🌞John Troughton1 день назад

@JOBhakdi FSD will be milked for all it’s worth. Huge money to be made

Фото профиля 축복ㆍ시방時方
축복ㆍ시방時方2 дней назад

@JOBhakdi 사이버캡

Фото профиля Rob Nichols
Rob Nichols2 дней назад

@JOBhakdi What happens if Tesla licenses the technology to other car companies?

Фото профиля William Johnson
William Johnson2 дней назад

@JOBhakdi Barry Glack and Co. are either too dense to see, or....they actually do see and us FSD users and Tesla's FSD creators are all insane. Nothing we experience is real. AND if it was real, there is a magic "Catch up to Tesla" button available.......NOT! Tesla has a 10 year lead here!

Фото профиля TheNextAlan
TheNextAlan1 день назад

@JOBhakdi AI cannot overcome the Tesla moat because they lack the training data. AI only knows what it has been trained on. Tesla's 14 billion miles of video is proprietary. Anthropic and OpenAI cannot invent it out of thin air.

Фото профиля Jason Scott
Jason Scott1 день назад

@JOBhakdi That fact that Tesla is in the market makes someone else developing autonomous driving much less likely. The reward to doing it has dropped significantly. Before you competed with Uber, now you have to compete with Tesla and an 18k + 6 miles / KWh Cybercab.

Фото профиля TT
TT2 дней назад

@JOBhakdi Exactly—autonomy is nowhere near interchangeable. You and @fotsguy are two stock accounts I always follow.

Фото профиля Jose Belarmino
Jose Belarmino1 день назад

@JOBhakdi The only way AGI goes from the digital to real world driving is if it takes a robot (ie like Optimus), uploads the AI driving software on to the robot’s neural nets, then the robot sits on a car and drives that car. There is no way an AI company can put up an AV car factory.

Фото профиля ElectricAdventures
ElectricAdventures2 дней назад

@JOBhakdi The longer it takes, the easier the AI path becomes. I’m impressed with what XPeng, WeRide and many other companies are achieving.

Похожие видео

Biggest warning I’ll give Tesla shorts right now. This time, you’re probably not going to get fucked by some classic short squeeze. You’re going to get fucked by being wrong about what Tesla becomes next. Look at the latest short-interest tape. As of the Aug 14 settlement: • 69,196,896 $TSLA shares short • ~2.2% of the float • 2.15 days to cover • ~$23.7 BILLION worth of stock short And the important part is that… Short interest peaked at 79.1M shares on June 30. So roughly 12.5% of those shorts had already been covered by August 14. So no… I’m NOT sitting here telling you that shorts are trapped. That’s not my thesis. My thesis is actually much more dangerous for a long-term Tesla short. What if they’re simply wrong? Wrong about autonomy. Wrong about Robotaxi. Wrong about Cybercab. And ultimately wrong about what Tesla’s earnings power could look like if this scales. Bc I’ve now watched this story go from something people laughed at… to something I personally rode in. My first Tesla Robotaxi ride in Austin was on launch day, June 22, 2025. Then I came back for the Cybercab launch on September 3, 2026. And it changed the way I look at Tesla. Cybercab isn’t something with Elon standing on a stage telling you what might happen five years from now. You can literally hail one. Pay for a ride. Get inside. There’s no steering wheel. No accelerator. No brake pedal. And it takes paying passengers through real Austin streets. Tesla itself now describes Cybercab as a fully autonomous, purpose-built two-seater in its Robotaxi fleet. That matters... Bc Tesla is no longer trying to prove that Robotaxi can exist bc it does exist. The next question is whether Tesla can scale it safely, economically and fast enough. And THAT is where I think shorts are massively underestimating the company. As of the latest Texas registry data, Tesla has 437 authorized vehicles in Texas - 388 Model Ys/49 Cybercabs It shows how quickly the fleet Tesla is preparing for commercial autonomy is growing. Now zoom out a bit. Tesla already lists more than 125,000 units of installed annual Cybercab manufacturing capacity in Texas. This is INSTALLED capacity. And Tesla calls Cybercab the “workhorse” of its Robotaxi fleet. Tesla spent most of its history making $ by building a vehicle and selling it once. Robotaxi opens a completely different model. Build the vehicle once. Then potentially monetize that same asset again. and again. and again. every time somebody takes a ride. Instead of only asking: “How many cars can Tesla sell this quarter?” You start asking: “How many autonomous miles can Tesla sell every day?” That is a MASSIVE change in the business model. And Cybercab is built specifically for that job. Not around a driver. Around the rider. If Tesla can bring those pieces together at scale, it has the potential to build a transportation network where the machine itself replaces THE largest costs in traditional ride-hailing: the human driver. Then there’s the flywheel. More Cybercabs. More geographic coverage. Shorter wait times. More rides. Higher fleet utilization. More recurring revenue. More capital to deploy even more vehicles. Tesla itself has told investors it expects hardware profits over time to be joined by accelerating AI, software and fleet-based profits. Does Tesla still have to execute? Absolutely. Regulation matters. Safety matters. Utilization matters. Manufacturing ramp matters. The economics have to work at scale. Those are legitimate risks, and anyone pretending otherwise isn’t being serious. But the serious Tesla short thesis can’t just be: “Elon promised autonomy before.” An actual bear now has to explain why a steering-wheel-free vehicle that is already carrying paying passengers won’t scale into a meaningful business. Tesla shorts are still betting against a car company, but I bet Cybercab is about to prove they’re shorting a transportation network.

Teslaconomics

34,104 просмотров • 2 дней назад