正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

FULL CLIP: Asmongold supports ad blocking but also considers it stealing, calling it unethical, saying there’s no universe in which ad blocking is ethical and explains why 👀😳 “A lot of you guys might not want to hear that and I've always said if you're going to steal steal...

fwprism's profile picture

Prism

2,000 subscribers

31,822 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"
2:05

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Brad

34,992 次观看 • 1 个月前

American Board Certified Pediatric Dentist explains why some people grow up having cavities and some people don’t “Ccavities are contagious. You're not born with the bacteria that actually causes them. You get them from your primary caregiver. So if you are a primary caregiver, like a mom, a dad, an auntie, whatever, don't share utensils with your little ones because you're going to spread that bacteria to their mouth and increase their risk of getting cavities.” Why is no one taught this in America
0:21

American Board Certified Pediatric Dentist explains why some people grow up having cavities and some people don’t “Ccavities are contagious. You're not born with the bacteria that actually causes them. You get them from your primary caregiver. So if you are a primary caregiver, like a mom, a dad, an auntie, whatever, don't share utensils with your little ones because you're going to spread that bacteria to their mouth and increase their risk of getting cavities.” Why is no one taught this in America

Wall Street Apes

554,188 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 WTF?! JD Vance just exposed that the Democrat AG of Wisconsin is REFUSING to verify recipients of federal welfare benefits are searching for work Cut off the funds! "When I hear the Attorney General of this state saying that we don't want to confirm that people are looking for work before they receive federal benefits, my natural question is, why are you so against people looking for a job?!" "That's it. We're not saying that we want anybody to go without medical benefits." "What we're saying is that we want you, if you're going to receive these benefits, we want you at least to try to find a job." "And I think in the same way that every single person in this room and every single tax paying citizen of Wisconsin hands their money over to the government, it's totally reasonable for them to expect the beneficiaries of that money to at least be looking for work. That's the contract. And if you violate that contract, you shouldn't get a dime of federal money."
0:52

🚨 WTF?! JD Vance just exposed that the Democrat AG of Wisconsin is REFUSING to verify recipients of federal welfare benefits are searching for work Cut off the funds! "When I hear the Attorney General of this state saying that we don't want to confirm that people are looking for work before they receive federal benefits, my natural question is, why are you so against people looking for a job?!" "That's it. We're not saying that we want anybody to go without medical benefits." "What we're saying is that we want you, if you're going to receive these benefits, we want you at least to try to find a job." "And I think in the same way that every single person in this room and every single tax paying citizen of Wisconsin hands their money over to the government, it's totally reasonable for them to expect the beneficiaries of that money to at least be looking for work. That's the contract. And if you violate that contract, you shouldn't get a dime of federal money."

Eric Daugherty

52,188 次观看 • 1 个月前

Coleman: It's disgusting and shameful and disrespectful that you have the anti-ICE protesters. Regardless of whether a person was the target of an ICE operation or not, why are they fleeing the scene? Maybe if they stop doing that, they wouldn't get hurt. Why are you so upset when you are told the truth? If you're here illegally and not doing anything wrong, why are you driving off?
1:03

Coleman: It's disgusting and shameful and disrespectful that you have the anti-ICE protesters. Regardless of whether a person was the target of an ICE operation or not, why are they fleeing the scene? Maybe if they stop doing that, they wouldn't get hurt. Why are you so upset when you are told the truth? If you're here illegally and not doing anything wrong, why are you driving off?

Acyn

129,610 次观看 • 1 个月前

Founder of lululemon on what he'd tell every 25 year old: "I'd tell them that every person in the world is an individual with a different genetic makeup and a different upbringing and the way that you're thinking is so radically different than every other person in the world and incomparable that if you have an idea and you want to move forward with it, don't worry so much about the competition because nobody will be able to replicate you and the way you think about it."
0:38

Founder of lululemon on what he'd tell every 25 year old: "I'd tell them that every person in the world is an individual with a different genetic makeup and a different upbringing and the way that you're thinking is so radically different than every other person in the world and incomparable that if you have an idea and you want to move forward with it, don't worry so much about the competition because nobody will be able to replicate you and the way you think about it."

Sam Stoffel

581,177 次观看 • 3 个月前

🦖: I don’t feel anything (about the situation). It all started because of my fan and (the post) said “Why do gay tops like to wear Stussy?”. I felt like teasing them so I said “Because it is cool”. Then some people said “But with this style/appearance, you do not seem like a top”. When I express myself, no matter what I am, it is something that came out of my mouth. So I feel that when there are people who would judge, for example, when you stated, “you are a male”, but there is someone who says, “But you are not a male”. How would you know what that person is? isn’t that right? Regarding the topic of gender and preference in terms of your role during intercourse, it is a private and sensitive matter. Since you are not living with them, you have no reason to judge them on whether they are a top or bottom. I feel that we have no right to judge people on these matters. In 2025, everyone can choose who they want to be and in these times, the world is more open-minded. Anything can happen. This kind of thing is fluid and a very personal matter. 🦖: I feel that when it is a very personal and sensitive thing, there might be a certain group of people who are not be comfortable expressing that they are not straight. Besides not being straight, this also includes having to state their sexual preference or their role during intercourse. It is way beyond that. So I feel that if they are comfortable expressing who they are, but you just feel that their outward appearance does not align with what you think, and then you judge them by saying “But this is not right, this appearance should be a bottom. There is no way.” How would you know? Isn’t that right? OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija
1:59

Sensitive content

🦖: I don’t feel anything (about the situation). It all started because of my fan and (the post) said “Why do gay tops like to wear Stussy?”. I felt like teasing them so I said “Because it is cool”. Then some people said “But with this style/appearance, you do not seem like a top”. When I express myself, no matter what I am, it is something that came out of my mouth. So I feel that when there are people who would judge, for example, when you stated, “you are a male”, but there is someone who says, “But you are not a male”. How would you know what that person is? isn’t that right? Regarding the topic of gender and preference in terms of your role during intercourse, it is a private and sensitive matter. Since you are not living with them, you have no reason to judge them on whether they are a top or bottom. I feel that we have no right to judge people on these matters. In 2025, everyone can choose who they want to be and in these times, the world is more open-minded. Anything can happen. This kind of thing is fluid and a very personal matter. 🦖: I feel that when it is a very personal and sensitive thing, there might be a certain group of people who are not be comfortable expressing that they are not straight. Besides not being straight, this also includes having to state their sexual preference or their role during intercourse. It is way beyond that. So I feel that if they are comfortable expressing who they are, but you just feel that their outward appearance does not align with what you think, and then you judge them by saying “But this is not right, this appearance should be a bottom. There is no way.” How would you know? Isn’t that right? OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija

𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐦.

249,277 次观看 • 1 年前

I'm constantly baffled that people don't understand that it is a volume and skill game to get followers, awareness, attention, and sales on social media. Too many people here are insecure and are overthinking their posts and, more importantly, only posting once every day, every other day, once a week. They are upset that they're not getting the results they're looking for. Just like at this fitness conference where I tried to make it very easy for them to understand why they weren't growing on social. It's no different than why so many of you are not growing in your fitness. You're not consistent. You're not doing it the right way. You're not doing it enough
0:35

I'm constantly baffled that people don't understand that it is a volume and skill game to get followers, awareness, attention, and sales on social media. Too many people here are insecure and are overthinking their posts and, more importantly, only posting once every day, every other day, once a week. They are upset that they're not getting the results they're looking for. Just like at this fitness conference where I tried to make it very easy for them to understand why they weren't growing on social. It's no different than why so many of you are not growing in your fitness. You're not consistent. You're not doing it the right way. You're not doing it enough

Gary Vaynerchuk

85,432 次观看 • 7 天前

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."
5:30

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,378 次观看 • 3 年前

"All of these actions - you don't take them to prove that you're a madman or that you're a tough guy or a macho and the rest. It simply - you take them when it is in the interest of your foreign policy and also to make sure that you are a credible leader..."
3:11

"All of these actions - you don't take them to prove that you're a madman or that you're a tough guy or a macho and the rest. It simply - you take them when it is in the interest of your foreign policy and also to make sure that you are a credible leader..."

Richard Nixon Foundation

18,417 次观看 • 6 个月前

.Second Lady Usha Vance responds to a student's question about how to be the best Second Lady: "I think they key thing, for anyone who is in this kind of role, is to try to just continue to be yourself. You have to do the best job that you can. And there are some responsibilities that come with it...you don't always choose what you are doing...But the most important thing is to remember the kind of person that you were before it, and the kind of person you want to be. If you can do that all the way through, then you can have a lot of fun — and maybe be helpful. You don't want to just start thinking of yourself as the Second Lady, because then you're probably not that fun a person anymore."
0:37

.Second Lady Usha Vance responds to a student's question about how to be the best Second Lady: "I think they key thing, for anyone who is in this kind of role, is to try to just continue to be yourself. You have to do the best job that you can. And there are some responsibilities that come with it...you don't always choose what you are doing...But the most important thing is to remember the kind of person that you were before it, and the kind of person you want to be. If you can do that all the way through, then you can have a lot of fun — and maybe be helpful. You don't want to just start thinking of yourself as the Second Lady, because then you're probably not that fun a person anymore."

Mary Margaret Olohan

1,111,670 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨CNN’s Dana Bash goes full state-run media hack, clashes with Sen. Tim Scott over "misinformation" and election integrity. Holy smokes. There is zero daylight between Bash and a combative Kamala campaign propagandist in this entire segment — because she is one: - "[Trump’s] setting the stage for his supporters not to believe the results if he loses. Do you want him to stop doing that???" - "I can't let go of the fact that you are saying it is the media spreading claims. It is not true!" - "We saw what happened on January 6th as a result of that and many other things. Are you saying right now you want to lead this conversation and say you are okay with his rhetoric?!?" - "So if you believe you just said that you believe that the election will be free and fair. So does that mean that you are confident that if Donald Trump loses? I know you think he's going to win, but let's just play this out. If he loses that, he will concede!??" Pure propaganda press stuff here on the eve of an election. There is zero trust in legacy media. And they wonder why.
4:08

🚨CNN’s Dana Bash goes full state-run media hack, clashes with Sen. Tim Scott over "misinformation" and election integrity. Holy smokes. There is zero daylight between Bash and a combative Kamala campaign propagandist in this entire segment — because she is one: - "[Trump’s] setting the stage for his supporters not to believe the results if he loses. Do you want him to stop doing that???" - "I can't let go of the fact that you are saying it is the media spreading claims. It is not true!" - "We saw what happened on January 6th as a result of that and many other things. Are you saying right now you want to lead this conversation and say you are okay with his rhetoric?!?" - "So if you believe you just said that you believe that the election will be free and fair. So does that mean that you are confident that if Donald Trump loses? I know you think he's going to win, but let's just play this out. If he loses that, he will concede!??" Pure propaganda press stuff here on the eve of an election. There is zero trust in legacy media. And they wonder why.

Western Lensman

819,339 次观看 • 1 年前

"There is a trickle of excitement from the Jets fan base and I am so f*cking sick of people who try to pour cold water on that the second it happens. If you're not a Jets fan and you are bothered that some Jets fans are excited they scored a TD with their starters on the opening drive of their second preseason game -- and you need to pour cold water on that with this fanbase that has stuck through this without the playoffs for almost two full decades -- what is wrong with you?!" Connor Rogers goes OFF on the #Jets haters!
1:02

"There is a trickle of excitement from the Jets fan base and I am so f*cking sick of people who try to pour cold water on that the second it happens. If you're not a Jets fan and you are bothered that some Jets fans are excited they scored a TD with their starters on the opening drive of their second preseason game -- and you need to pour cold water on that with this fanbase that has stuck through this without the playoffs for almost two full decades -- what is wrong with you?!" Connor Rogers goes OFF on the #Jets haters!

Badlands

81,959 次观看 • 10 天前

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.
0:51

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

16,579 次观看 • 4 个月前

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)
3:25

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

11,811 次观看 • 9 个月前

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”
2:44

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,627 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨JUST IN: Andrew Tate speaks on how positively Kazakhstan’s society is functioning: "All of the things that are distracting you, that have you arguing with your Neighbour and family….never cross their mind." "I've not seen a single Homeless person or a single crackhead."
3:06

🚨JUST IN: Andrew Tate speaks on how positively Kazakhstan’s society is functioning: "All of the things that are distracting you, that have you arguing with your Neighbour and family….never cross their mind." "I've not seen a single Homeless person or a single crackhead."

Neo

14,281 次观看 • 6 个月前

Asmongold warns against treating political opponents as good faith actors "I've said it a million times and I'll say it a million more. These people don't have any values. They just simply have goals." "If you treat them as people with values and you capitulate to having a moral or ethical understanding with them, the only reason they want that is so they can take advantage of you. It's so they can subvert you or use that value against you." "To the extent that you find yourself on the same side as them, you should be asking yourself why. You can never have shared values with these people. If it was up to them, you'd be in jail."
1:13

Asmongold warns against treating political opponents as good faith actors "I've said it a million times and I'll say it a million more. These people don't have any values. They just simply have goals." "If you treat them as people with values and you capitulate to having a moral or ethical understanding with them, the only reason they want that is so they can take advantage of you. It's so they can subvert you or use that value against you." "To the extent that you find yourself on the same side as them, you should be asking yourself why. You can never have shared values with these people. If it was up to them, you'd be in jail."

Asmongold Updates

17,340 次观看 • 1 个月前

McGovern: Can you explain what is happening with the Iran war powers resolution that was scheduled to be voted on this evening? Are we not voting on it because the American people are sick and tired of this illegal war that is costing tens of billions of dollars? Gas prices are through the roof. People can't afford their groceries. Is that why you're pulling it? You guys don't have the guts or the balls…
0:55

McGovern: Can you explain what is happening with the Iran war powers resolution that was scheduled to be voted on this evening? Are we not voting on it because the American people are sick and tired of this illegal war that is costing tens of billions of dollars? Gas prices are through the roof. People can't afford their groceries. Is that why you're pulling it? You guys don't have the guts or the balls…

Acyn

247,632 次观看 • 3 个月前