Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
FULL CLIP: Asmongold supports ad blocking but also considers it stealing, calling it unethical, saying there’s no universe in which ad blocking is ethical and explains why 👀😳 “A lot of you guys might not want to hear that and I've always said if you're going to steal steal... show more
31,996 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce •via X (Twitter)
34 Yorum
It doesn't matter how many hoops I have to jump in I will ALWAYS use adblock even if it gets banned im strokin my shit. AD BLOCK TILL THE DAY I DIE. The internet without Adblock is a cess pool with 16 embedded ads and 42 side, top, bottom banners that redirect you to "Cunt Wars"
Google already steals every semblance of my privacy. They can go fuck themselves. I shall ad-block till privacy is restored!
Na fuck asmon on this one. He is only defending cause ads are good for him.
Yea thats a no @Asmongold, with regard to streaming subscription services, im paying for that streaming service, im not agreeing to pay to watch 50 ads a day just because some video/movie/tv show (streaming service) wants to sell MY WATCH TIME to other companies. And 90% of the time I can't get through a 1015 minute video on YouTube without there being 7 or 8 1:30sec ads so fuck that. You know there was this time about 20 ish years ago or so when these streaming services operated & marketed on the fact that they didn't have ads and that was the advertisement to bring you over from cable TV because cable TV was $80 a month and 50% of the content was ads. Now people are really talking about it's stealing to use ad blockers for something that you didn't agree to fucking watch in the first place.
Retarded take. Ads have no benefits to society. Because google succeeded in making believe they are necessary for their dominant top profits worldwide products, people dont challenge it . But its obvious they arent necessary at all. Many products exist withour any advertisement
His opinion is his own. I think companies should pay us for using our data to serve ads; otherwise we should have the right to keep them off our devices.
Ad salesman says ads are good, actually
I would appreciate a full contract with all data collection and costs on the table. Currently, the "free with advertising" is a lopsided deal that hosts and creators hope stays a mystery to the users.
If they made YouTube a $1 subscription or $10 per year and you could watch all YouTube videos in 1080p while those who want 4K pay $3, nobody would use AdBlock. I would not have a problem paying like $20-$30 for this little subscription for all the content I consume, like X, YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Instagram, etc. But if they make me pay $10-$15 each month for each service or have tons of ads every 5-10 min, then no thank you!
hes a hypocrite thats not new. You are the idiots funding him
Fun fact: Youtube and Twitch once had no ads. Its not our fault that these sites gets flooded with people who want to get paid, if anything the sites were better before those people came. Also ads only decrease in value, so like TV you now pay for the channel showing you ads.
Problem with ads is we pay for subscription to not have ads, then the company changes pricing and puts ads back in. It keeps going and going tv used to be free because it paid itself through ads. It’s always pay more and we will still show more ads ( greed fucked up a good thing) so at this point fuck them since they steal my time and money.
I've been using Brave browser for a while now. I would never go back. These adds run on YOUR hardware, they waste YOUR bandwidth. No matter what companies might think, if their monetisation pattern relies on something happening on my hardware, they are going to be dissappointed.
Yuhhhhh couldn’t have agreeed more
I don't have an issue with ads in theory, I do have an issue with ad networks that don't properly vet those paying to serve up ads and instead serve up malware and scams. So I run an ad blocker. Sorry, not sorry.
When there stops being an overwhelming amount of intrusive advertising I'll stop ad blocking Some sites are so bloated with ads the site becomes unusable
If it’s free content requiring no subscription then I’m ok with an ad that can be skipped, but if I’m paying a subscription then there should be zero ads.
being ethical isnt even on my list of concerns.
How did the internet run before when there was hardly any ads… are we serious YouTube Ran for fucking YEARS with out ads
Actually there were plety of amazing creators before monetisation. Human beings genuinely love art and building cool things. Not everything is about money
Yeah yeah
if ad-block is stealing, then switching tabs during an ad, and playing chess for a minute, is stealing. What a silly argument. there's no social contracts, it's just competing mechanisms that need to be adapted to, a war game really.
Yeah maybe if enough content creators spoke out about mainstream sites straight up censoring views I'd have turned off ad block 10 years ago, but I'm not supporting these slime balls.
Look, its basically piracy and everyone knows piracy is wrong. You're basically taking from someone. But I still do it.
I agree with him but I'm still going strong with my adblocking when I can
Ads made him fortune
It's a retarded take. You give me something for free, I will use it in the way I see fit. There has never been an expectation that people watch ads just because you decide to show them.
Yea use the same argument to pull 100 ads a day up my ass... fk off. Oh no I'm a bad consumer and a thief for not wasting my time watching annoying shit in disproportionate amounts or paying each single service! I should waste more time working so I can waste less watching ads!
Lol, nah fam. You entered into a contract with Youtube. I ain't owe you shit, and I like your content. But you can bet there's at least one other smartass white dude out there that can be just as entertaining.
asmon: ad blocks are bad, use them, i do, i support you using them, but dotn lie to yourself or others thats its good twitter : lies to itself and others that he didnt say that , and that its good
I dont mind Adds, but for fuck sake not every singels second, its getting out of hand.
Adblock till these companies pay us for our data
stop paying all of these bums
I'd buy subscriptions on stuff like YouTube if they didn't keep fking increasing the price and adding bullshit I don't care about as a justification.. I will NEVER not use Ublock/Adblockers on websites I rarely visit.
Benzer Videolar
Sensitive content
🦖: I don’t feel anything (about the situation). It all started because of my fan and (the post) said “Why do gay tops like to wear Stussy?”. I felt like teasing them so I said “Because it is cool”. Then some people said “But with this style/appearance, you do not seem like a top”. When I express myself, no matter what I am, it is something that came out of my mouth. So I feel that when there are people who would judge, for example, when you stated, “you are a male”, but there is someone who says, “But you are not a male”. How would you know what that person is? isn’t that right? Regarding the topic of gender and preference in terms of your role during intercourse, it is a private and sensitive matter. Since you are not living with them, you have no reason to judge them on whether they are a top or bottom. I feel that we have no right to judge people on these matters. In 2025, everyone can choose who they want to be and in these times, the world is more open-minded. Anything can happen. This kind of thing is fluid and a very personal matter. 🦖: I feel that when it is a very personal and sensitive thing, there might be a certain group of people who are not be comfortable expressing that they are not straight. Besides not being straight, this also includes having to state their sexual preference or their role during intercourse. It is way beyond that. So I feel that if they are comfortable expressing who they are, but you just feel that their outward appearance does not align with what you think, and then you judge them by saying “But this is not right, this appearance should be a bottom. There is no way.” How would you know? Isn’t that right? OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija
𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐦.
249,277 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
![.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1684670109636300800/ext_tw_video_thumb/1684659748820426752/pu/img/FjRpVoLx9OkSek6l.jpg)
![🚨CNN’s Dana Bash goes full state-run media hack, clashes with Sen. Tim Scott over "misinformation" and election integrity. Holy smokes. There is zero daylight between Bash and a combative Kamala campaign propagandist in this entire segment — because she is one: - "[Trump’s] setting the stage for his supporters not to believe the results if he loses. Do you want him to stop doing that???" - "I can't let go of the fact that you are saying it is the media spreading claims. It is not true!" - "We saw what happened on January 6th as a result of that and many other things. Are you saying right now you want to lead this conversation and say you are okay with his rhetoric?!?" - "So if you believe you just said that you believe that the election will be free and fair. So does that mean that you are confident that if Donald Trump loses? I know you think he's going to win, but let's just play this out. If he loses that, he will concede!??" Pure propaganda press stuff here on the eve of an election. There is zero trust in legacy media. And they wonder why.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1853087726091780246/ext_tw_video_thumb/1853086625133367296/pu/img/zzdPGGgmS4FmI6rX.jpg)
![I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2049167429041824109/ext_tw_video_thumb/2049167371538251780/pu/img/25DXjHkj6hG_xBzD.jpg)
