Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Full Debate Analysis: Trump won convincingly, had a strong performance, despite going into a 3-1 debate against the moderators. However, Kamala did not bomb, and did enough to keep her campaign alive. The story of the debate is ABC showing their blatant bias in favor of Kamala, and weaponized...

534,462 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ka78
Ka78vor 1 Jahr

I think it's a safer bet that ABC were given the questions

Profilbild von Clandestine
Clandestinevor 1 Jahr

That’s probably a better way of putting it, yes.

Profilbild von Lauren Nann
Lauren Nannvor 1 Jahr

Check her earpieces, I mean earrings

Profilbild von Tom John 🫵🏻
Tom John 🫵🏻vor 1 Jahr

At least Trump said we must stop nuclear WW3 Armageddon at all cost! Kamala didn't say anything. Except usual lies and frazes which belongs in 80s,90s.

Profilbild von VerusChristianus
VerusChristianusvor 1 Jahr

Agree. I am surprised by how well rehearsal that seemed. Not a compliment. That it was so blatant implies that they felt they had no other options... ABC is the loser of this debate.

Profilbild von Brandon Els
Brandon Elsvor 1 Jahr

Trump’s body language and restraint to not go personal easily won it for ordinary folk versus Harris emotional and weird facial expressions with waving hands. Trump was stoic under attack.

Profilbild von Seth Mitchell
Seth Mitchellvor 1 Jahr

She knew the questions. Moderators were horribly biased. No policy details from kamala. Just an attempt to attack President Trump. Kamala and ABC have proven how phony they truly are.

Profilbild von Stella
Stellavor 1 Jahr

@JoJo75141025 Wonder if others feel fury watching her get away with blatant lies... 👹

Profilbild von The Fleece News Network
The Fleece News Networkvor 1 Jahr

The fact that he was the one that basically said, excuse me I'm speaking, effectively stealing her one line she was hoping to use, is just absolute GOLD.

Profilbild von Bob Starr
Bob Starrvor 1 Jahr

Great analysis. Agreed. I do think that the Kamala team is now considering another debate. That will be lethal for them . Do it.

Ähnliche Videos

EVEN globalist-owned CNN is now getting frustrated that the Deep State is still hiding their smuggled, emergency candidate, Kamala from the media. Till this day, no interviews, no press conferences and obviously, she just expectedly turned down Trump’s offer for debate on FOX. For the records, an earlier debate was scheduled between Trump and Biden on ABC. But Biden is no longer the nominee, and Trump is in court with ABC and suing ABC’s George Stephanopoulos for defamation. That’s why Trump said, let’s have it on FOX News. But Kamala bailed. Fox is to Conservatives what CNN, ABC, MSNBC and literally all other mainstream news networks are to liberals. But Trump accepted to debate Biden on a Trump -hating network like CNN. He also accepted the invitation of the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago on an ultra-liberal platform. The invitation was extended to both Trump and Kamala. In fact the group assured Trump that Harris was going to be there. It turned out they were lying. Kamala never showed up and from the look of things, they knew but kept it from Trump (He actually accused them of that.) And guess what? Rather than talk about Kamala running away from the first opportunity to speak to Americans on issues with Trump, they turned on Trump for things he said or didn’t say. No word on Kamala’s bailing. Well, she has bailed again and now claims she’s attending the so called ABC debate that Trump won’t be attending. So they’re gonna give her all of that air time to lie and lie and lie and there will be zero fact-checking or rebuttal from the Blackrock - owned media shills who will be interviewing her. They know as some of us do that Kamala is ten times less popular than Biden even with all cognitive decline, but of course, that’s not what the polls are saying and obviously, that’s not what you see in the media with the fake, manufacture popularity. Without registering illegals to vote, or trying to kill Trump again, or starting an international war that becomes world war 3 or triggering the breakout of another pandemic to lockdown the U.S., they know too well that Trump is their next president and it scares them to death. The desperation in their camp right now is beyond palpable. But you’ll never see that in the media. Again, that’s why they wanna still kill your man, Trump. May God keep him.

J. C. Okechukwu

14,440 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or falsely fact-checked during the debate: 1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks: Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants to launch a mandatory buyback program. The ABC moderators said nothing. 2. "Fine People" Hoax: Kamala Harris claimed Trump called neo-N*zi's "very fine people." This hoax was debunked by Snopes but the ABC moderators let it slide. The ABC moderators said nothing. 3. Post-Birth Abortion: Trump claimed babies were 'k*lled' outside the womb in failed abortions. Under Tim Walz, babies born alive in botched abortions are allowed to be left to d*e. Eight babies who survived abortions in Minnesota were abandoned and sadly perished under Walz. The ABC moderators simply said Trump was lying and moved on without adding context. 4. Defund the Police: Kamala Harris laughed when Trump said she wanted to defund the police. During a previous interview, Harris said having more cops on the street is "wrong." She also supported taking police officers out of schools. The ABC moderators said nothing. 5. Bl**dbath Hoax: Kamala Harris claimed Trump said there would be a bl**dbath if he is not elected, insinuating that his supporters would start k*lling people. This is completely false. The comment was made during a rally where Trump said there would be a "bl**dbath" for the American auto industry if he is not elected. The ABC moderators said nothing.

Collin Rugg

6,901,056 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

Western Lensman

41,369,633 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

She is Biden: The ABC Debate Fiasco - Where's the Fair Play? ABC is totally biased against Donald Trump let's dive into why this is the case. She is Biden, and tonight, Kamala Harris proved just that at the ABC debate, standing not as her own candidate but as the shadow of Joe Biden, echoing his policies, his failures, and his vision for America, which has led us astray. The ABC Debate Night Tonight, as millions tuned into ABC, expecting a fair battleground for ideas, what they witnessed instead was a glaring example of media bias. Here's how it unfolded: She is Biden Kamala Harris took the stage, not as a fresh voice for America, but as a mouthpiece for the current administration. "She is Biden," supporters whispered across social media platforms. Her policies? A mirror image of Biden's. From economic strategies to foreign policy, Harris did little to differentiate herself, reinforcing the notion that a vote for her is essentially a vote for a third Biden term. This isn't just a talking point; it's a reality for those who feel the current presidency has not addressed their concerns. The ABC Bias The debate, hosted by ABC, was supposed to be a neutral ground. However, from the outset, the moderators seemed to debate Trump themselves. Questions were loaded, follow-ups were scarce when Harris spoke, but when it came to Trump, it felt like an interrogation rather than a debate. The bias was palpable, with posts on X highlighting every instance where Trump was cut off or challenged more aggressively than Harris. "Quite Please," as Trump used Kamala's own lines against her. Quiet Please is a trending phrase as viewers begged for moderators to let Trump speak without interruption. Quite Please, Let Them Debate! The cry for moderators to step back and "Quite Please" allow the candidates to engage directly with each other was loud among Trump supporters. The constant interjections not only disrupted the flow but also seemed strategically placed to throw Trump off his game. This interference was seen not just as poor moderation but as an active participation against Trump. This debate was 3 on 1! Where is Our President? The sentiment "Where is our President?" echoed through the night. Not only referring to Biden, but to Trump, who many supporters feel was the last true defender of their values in the White House. They yearned for the days when, in their view, America was first, energy was independent, and the economy was booming. Tonight's debate was a stark reminder of what has been lost, with Harris's performance only underscoring the continuity of Biden's policies. Conclusion: A Night of Missed Opportunities For Trump supporters, the ABC debate was less about policy discussion and more about the struggle against what they perceive as entrenched media bias. "She is Biden" wasn't just a critique of Harris but a broader commentary on the lack of new vision from the current administration. The debate left many questions unanswered and reinforced the divide. Where was the fair play? Where was the opportunity for Trump to present his vision without the filter of bias? As the night ended, the conversation on X wasn't about policy wins or losses but about the battle against bias, the call for respect ("Quite Please"), and the longing for what supporters see as strong leadership. Tonight, ABC didn't just host a debate; for many, it staged a showdown between Trump and the establishment, with "She is Biden" as the theme echoing into the night. Trump won the debate because he has truth and an amazing record on his side. Trump won the debate against three people. Kamala sounded scripted like she literally memorized the answers in advance.

Thomas Paine Band

73,031 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: *Loren Merchan’s X account with a pic of Trump behind jail bars is the same X account linked to official staff page for Kamala Harris’s Presidential campaign on the website “Democracy in Action”. There is a direct hyperlink which takes you to the same account. Following the release of my expose into Loren Merchan, the daughter of Judge Merchan, who is overseeing President Trump’s trial, the media went into rapid response mode to do damage control and cover up for the judge and his daughter whose X account was a photo of Donald Trump behind jail bars. They lied to all of you and said my investigation was incorrect after President Trump shared it and commented on it. From the Kamala Harris For the People 2020 Campaign: As you can see from this screen recorded video, Loren Merchan is listed as the “Director of Digital Persuasion” for Kamala Harris’s Presidential campaign. Loren is the daughter of Judge Juan Merchan. Judge Merchan is a rabid hater of President Trump, and will be attempting to imprison President Trump, in order to remove his name from the 2024 ballot. When I exposed the account, the account was locked and the pic was changed to a picture of Kamala Harris as a child. Now you see why…. Merchan was the Director of digital persuasion for Kamala. Her account hasn’t been taken over by someone else. It’s her account. You know who would change their pic to a pic of Kamala Harris? Someone who was paid to work for Kamala Harris. Notice it’s the same handle linked on the official staff page for Kamala Harris. @Lorenm426 The same account Loren promoted in her own presentation. And the same account that had the X pic of Trump behind jail bars. Happy Easter! Cc: E

Laura Loomer

1,181,578 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren