Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

FULL INTERVIEW: Brendan Carr calls AI the 3rd great technological leap, after the internet and the mobile internet. He says the people calling it the end of the world are running the exact same playbook they ran on net neutrality. Brendan Carr is Chairman of the FCC. He joined... Theo Jaffee and sof 𓋹 in DC on the Build America Agenda, spectrum for space, and what the FCC is doing about AI and cyber: 01:08 what the Build America Agenda actually is 02:27 the new rules on humanoid and quadruped robots 03:12 what happened after the drone and router bans 03:43 the weird space stuff that needs spectrum, including drugs made in zero gravity 05:00 turning the FCC's space bureau into a processing plant 05:36 if you built towers and connected nobody, maybe someone else should have that spectrum 06:07 why the old approach to robocalls didn't work 07:14 they've kicked thousands of voice providers off the US phone network 07:30 what you can do about bot farms outside the country 08:25 getting telecom carriers early access to new models before release 08:36 what he can and can't say about AI and cyber 09:21 the same people running the same playbook they ran on net neutrality 11:37 how the FCC thinks about neutrality heading into the midterms 11:50 the deal broadcasters made with the American public, and who wants out of itshow more

MTS

521,280 subscribers

71,711 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 Kommentare

Profilbild von Monty Tayloe

Monty Tayloevor 6 Tagen

@BrendanCarrFCC @FCC Putting the timetamps in like this is a truly heroic move, thank you so much.

Profilbild von Praveen Jatta

Praveen Jattavor 7 Tagen

There's a key distinction. Net neutrality debates were about who controls bandwidth. AI safety concerns are about whether systems behave as intended — a technical verification problem, not regulatory ideology. Carr can support AI growth AND back accountability frameworks. Those aren't opposites. #AIPolicy #AIGovernance

Profilbild von Matt Larsen 🔊

Matt Larsen 🔊vor 7 Tagen

@BrendanCarrFCC @FCC America First? this guy is such a weasel

Profilbild von Mira Synth Tech

Mira Synth Techvor 7 Tagen

@BrendanCarrFCC @FCC Great breakdown. Comparing AI to internet and mobile as the third leap makes a lot of sense

Ähnliche Videos

FULL INTERVIEW: Jared Isaacman says if you don't want data centers in your backyard, put them in space. The physics isn't broken, the economics are hard, and hitting pause while rivals keep building isn't a strategy. Jared Isaacman is the Administrator of NASA. He joined Theo Jaffee and sof 𓋹 on the new U.S. Space Academy, nuclear propulsion, and why he thinks losing the second space race would cost more than anyone expects: 00:42 the Space Academy the President just announced 01:58 why it's a four-year federal academy, not a trade school 02:52 attracting talent is easy, keeping it is the hard part 03:13 why NASA can never overlap with industry 03:53 why NASA has aura and the IRS doesn't 05:11 Elon refocusing on the moon, and why Mars is still the prize 06:34 fission, then fusion, then antimatter annihilation 07:50 what AI builders could learn from how NASA tells its story 09:09 if you don't want data centers in your backyard, put them in space 11:43 whether we should build a Dyson swarm 12:51 bring HD cameras this time, we're leaving no doubters behind 13:18 putting iPhones on Artemis II was one of his first executive orders 13:57 what the ISS is actually doing up there 15:05 the nuclear octocopter going to Titan 16:12 why NASA should exist at all when the private sector can do it 17:43 the space race nobody is talking about

FULL INTERVIEW: Jared Isaacman says if you don't want data centers in your backyard, put them in space. The physics isn't broken, the economics are hard, and hitting pause while rivals keep building isn't a strategy. Jared Isaacman is the Administrator of NASA. He joined Theo Jaffee and sof 𓋹 on the new U.S. Space Academy, nuclear propulsion, and why he thinks losing the second space race would cost more than anyone expects: 00:42 the Space Academy the President just announced 01:58 why it's a four-year federal academy, not a trade school 02:52 attracting talent is easy, keeping it is the hard part 03:13 why NASA can never overlap with industry 03:53 why NASA has aura and the IRS doesn't 05:11 Elon refocusing on the moon, and why Mars is still the prize 06:34 fission, then fusion, then antimatter annihilation 07:50 what AI builders could learn from how NASA tells its story 09:09 if you don't want data centers in your backyard, put them in space 11:43 whether we should build a Dyson swarm 12:51 bring HD cameras this time, we're leaving no doubters behind 13:18 putting iPhones on Artemis II was one of his first executive orders 13:57 what the ISS is actually doing up there 15:05 the nuclear octocopter going to Titan 16:12 why NASA should exist at all when the private sector can do it 17:43 the space race nobody is talking about

MTS

184,472 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

🚨 WOW! Chairman Brendan Carr confirms the FCC is ACTIVELY looking into taking action against networks after President Trump said he's reporting Kristen Welker to the FCC The FCC is also looking into "fake polls" being aired to suppress Americans' confidence DOOCY: "He did not like that the moderator said his record on endorsements was mixed. He said he was going to report Kristen Welker to the FCC for rebuke or punishment. You are the FCC. Have you received this report?" CARR: "Broadcast TV is completely different than other forms of distribution, including cable. And so many broadcasters right now, they want to break the deal that they cut with the American people. They get billions of dollars in taxpayer effectively subsidized distribution." "And what they're supposed to do in exchange is operate in the public interest, not some sort of narrow partisan interest. I think President Trump is over the target and we're looking at a lot of actions." "For instance, there's a lot of interest right now in fake polls that are out there. The FCC may put guidance out soon to remind broadcasters about their obligations with respect to not airing fake polls, particularly if they're done to suppress people heading into the fall."

🚨 WOW! Chairman Brendan Carr confirms the FCC is ACTIVELY looking into taking action against networks after President Trump said he's reporting Kristen Welker to the FCC The FCC is also looking into "fake polls" being aired to suppress Americans' confidence DOOCY: "He did not like that the moderator said his record on endorsements was mixed. He said he was going to report Kristen Welker to the FCC for rebuke or punishment. You are the FCC. Have you received this report?" CARR: "Broadcast TV is completely different than other forms of distribution, including cable. And so many broadcasters right now, they want to break the deal that they cut with the American people. They get billions of dollars in taxpayer effectively subsidized distribution." "And what they're supposed to do in exchange is operate in the public interest, not some sort of narrow partisan interest. I think President Trump is over the target and we're looking at a lot of actions." "For instance, there's a lot of interest right now in fake polls that are out there. The FCC may put guidance out soon to remind broadcasters about their obligations with respect to not airing fake polls, particularly if they're done to suppress people heading into the fall."

Eric Daugherty

94,916 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Another mindblowing conversation with my good friend .Emad... Enjoy!! 00:00 - Introduction 00:22 - AI: The Biggest Shift in Human History 00:42 - AI’s Impact on Society and the Economy 01:03 - Conversation with Emad Mostaque Begins 01:50 - The Acceleration of AI and Economic Takeoff 03:07 - AI Intelligence: Beyond Human IQ 04:08 - The Rise of AI Chefs and Super Cooks 05:07 - Breaking AI Constraints: Compute and Energy 07:03 - The Future of AI: Ubiquitous Intelligence 08:04 - The Shift to Local AI Models 10:07 - Why Has Apple Lagged in AI? 11:21 - The AI Race: OpenAI, Grok, Gemini, and More 13:11 - China’s Open-Source AI Strategy 14:57 - AI Bias and Ethical Challenges 16:57 - AI’s Cross-Pollination and Memory 18:02 - Are AI Models Becoming Self-Aware? 19:16 - AI, Bitcoin, and Self-Sustaining Algorithms 21:26 - AI-Driven Economies and Autonomous Companies 23:41 - The Future of Labor: A World Without Jobs? 25:26 - AI-Powered Robots: The Next Workforce Revolution 27:28 - The End of Traditional Economic Models 30:27 - The Political Shift: Humanist vs. Transhumanist 33:04 - AI in Financial Markets: The End of Human Traders? 36:03 - The Evolution of Investing in an AI World 38:33 - AI’s Impact on Capital Formation and Business Disruption 40:01 - The Rise of Digital Twins and Post-Capital Society 42:45 - Building AI for Education, Healthcare, and Governance 46:42 - The Future of Money in an AI-Driven World 50:11 - Universal Basic AI: A New Economic Model 54:29 - The Deflationary Impact of AI and Crypto’s Role 57:02 - The AI Singularity: Five Years Until Everything Changes 58:56 - The Road Ahead: AI, Crypto, and the Future of Civilization 01:02:24 - Final Thoughts: The Most Exciting and Terrifying Time in History

Another mindblowing conversation with my good friend .Emad... Enjoy!! 00:00 - Introduction 00:22 - AI: The Biggest Shift in Human History 00:42 - AI’s Impact on Society and the Economy 01:03 - Conversation with Emad Mostaque Begins 01:50 - The Acceleration of AI and Economic Takeoff 03:07 - AI Intelligence: Beyond Human IQ 04:08 - The Rise of AI Chefs and Super Cooks 05:07 - Breaking AI Constraints: Compute and Energy 07:03 - The Future of AI: Ubiquitous Intelligence 08:04 - The Shift to Local AI Models 10:07 - Why Has Apple Lagged in AI? 11:21 - The AI Race: OpenAI, Grok, Gemini, and More 13:11 - China’s Open-Source AI Strategy 14:57 - AI Bias and Ethical Challenges 16:57 - AI’s Cross-Pollination and Memory 18:02 - Are AI Models Becoming Self-Aware? 19:16 - AI, Bitcoin, and Self-Sustaining Algorithms 21:26 - AI-Driven Economies and Autonomous Companies 23:41 - The Future of Labor: A World Without Jobs? 25:26 - AI-Powered Robots: The Next Workforce Revolution 27:28 - The End of Traditional Economic Models 30:27 - The Political Shift: Humanist vs. Transhumanist 33:04 - AI in Financial Markets: The End of Human Traders? 36:03 - The Evolution of Investing in an AI World 38:33 - AI’s Impact on Capital Formation and Business Disruption 40:01 - The Rise of Digital Twins and Post-Capital Society 42:45 - Building AI for Education, Healthcare, and Governance 46:42 - The Future of Money in an AI-Driven World 50:11 - Universal Basic AI: A New Economic Model 54:29 - The Deflationary Impact of AI and Crypto’s Role 57:02 - The AI Singularity: Five Years Until Everything Changes 58:56 - The Road Ahead: AI, Crypto, and the Future of Civilization 01:02:24 - Final Thoughts: The Most Exciting and Terrifying Time in History

Raoul Pal

326,827 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What does it take to move from AI experimentation to real business impact? Our COO Olivia Nottebohm on content strategy, governance, platform flexibility, and the workforce narrative nobody is talking about, all grounded in findings from our State of AI in the Enterprise report. Timestamps 01:07 Why AI adoption has been so rapid 02:15 Why the ROI gap exists between leading edge and early stage 04:04 The data and content strategy problem 05:56 Real customer examples of new types of work 08:14 Why unstructured data is the biggest unlock 10:07 What good governance looks like 12:30 Headless architecture and platform flexibility 14:21 AI and the workforce

What does it take to move from AI experimentation to real business impact? Our COO Olivia Nottebohm on content strategy, governance, platform flexibility, and the workforce narrative nobody is talking about, all grounded in findings from our State of AI in the Enterprise report. Timestamps 01:07 Why AI adoption has been so rapid 02:15 Why the ROI gap exists between leading edge and early stage 04:04 The data and content strategy problem 05:56 Real customer examples of new types of work 08:14 Why unstructured data is the biggest unlock 10:07 What good governance looks like 12:30 Headless architecture and platform flexibility 14:21 AI and the workforce

Box

1,554,784 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

FULL INTERVIEW: Beff (e/acc) says Z1T hits up to 140x the energy efficiency of a GPU, and 100x at the data center level. The end game, he says, is chips in space powered by the sun. Beff (e/acc) is founder and CEO of Extropic. He joined sof 𓋹 to launch Z1T, the first family of transformer-like models built for sparse probabilistic hardware: 01:12 what Z1T is, and how long they've been cooking it 02:32 why models on GPUs are dense and his chip isn't 03:15 a new scaling law where you scale connectivity, not just flops 04:08 how you get 140x, and why a pbit uses 10,000 fewer transistors 07:12 where Z1 sits next to GPUs, and why it's decode not prefill 08:37 100x energy efficiency at the data center level 09:14 you might see Extropic chips in space sooner rather than later 09:45 open weights vs an open training recipe 10:24 Z1T is barely GPT-2, and they started a run last night for GPT-3 11:05 the chips are cooking right now at a major fab overseas 12:58 gated convolutional attention, and the layer they haven't cracked 14:03 the Hardware Lottery, and why he wants people gambling again 15:20 what happens if inference gets 1,000x more efficient 16:59 why you can do this research without a basement full of GPUs

FULL INTERVIEW: Beff (e/acc) says Z1T hits up to 140x the energy efficiency of a GPU, and 100x at the data center level. The end game, he says, is chips in space powered by the sun. Beff (e/acc) is founder and CEO of Extropic. He joined sof 𓋹 to launch Z1T, the first family of transformer-like models built for sparse probabilistic hardware: 01:12 what Z1T is, and how long they've been cooking it 02:32 why models on GPUs are dense and his chip isn't 03:15 a new scaling law where you scale connectivity, not just flops 04:08 how you get 140x, and why a pbit uses 10,000 fewer transistors 07:12 where Z1 sits next to GPUs, and why it's decode not prefill 08:37 100x energy efficiency at the data center level 09:14 you might see Extropic chips in space sooner rather than later 09:45 open weights vs an open training recipe 10:24 Z1T is barely GPT-2, and they started a run last night for GPT-3 11:05 the chips are cooking right now at a major fab overseas 12:58 gated convolutional attention, and the layer they haven't cracked 14:03 the Hardware Lottery, and why he wants people gambling again 15:20 what happens if inference gets 1,000x more efficient 16:59 why you can do this research without a basement full of GPUs

MTS

30,878 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Had a great talk with Anjney Midha about why he left a16z to start AMP PBC (raised $1.3B), his early bet on Anthropic, the importance of Japan in AI, his class at Stanford and a lot more. I didn't make him cry like Harry Stebbings, but I think it was a fun conversation about the future of AI Infra. Enjoy! 00:00 Introduction to AMP and AI Infrastructure 03:07 Transition from A16Z to AMP 06:01 Understanding AMP's Role in AI Compute 08:57 The Concept of a Compute Grid 11:59 The Need for Standardization in AI Infrastructure 14:59 Education and Collaboration in AI Development 17:59 Global Perspectives on AI Infrastructure 21:03 Japan's Role in AI and Robotics 23:14 Cultural Connections: Japan and Germany 25:08 The Journey to Teaching at Stanford 26:04 Security in Infrastructure: Lessons Learned 27:50 Cybersecurity and AI: A New Frontier 29:27 The Importance of Redundancy in Cybersecurity 30:39 Investing in AI: The Anthropic Experience 32:54 Wealth Creation and Public Participation 34:06 Infrastructure Bottlenecks in AI Development 36:57 Global Perspectives on Data Centers 39:11 The Need for Education on AI Benefits 42:07 Learning from China: A Systems Approach 45:47 Conclusion: Coordinating the Western Frontier

Had a great talk with Anjney Midha about why he left a16z to start AMP PBC (raised $1.3B), his early bet on Anthropic, the importance of Japan in AI, his class at Stanford and a lot more. I didn't make him cry like Harry Stebbings, but I think it was a fun conversation about the future of AI Infra. Enjoy! 00:00 Introduction to AMP and AI Infrastructure 03:07 Transition from A16Z to AMP 06:01 Understanding AMP's Role in AI Compute 08:57 The Concept of a Compute Grid 11:59 The Need for Standardization in AI Infrastructure 14:59 Education and Collaboration in AI Development 17:59 Global Perspectives on AI Infrastructure 21:03 Japan's Role in AI and Robotics 23:14 Cultural Connections: Japan and Germany 25:08 The Journey to Teaching at Stanford 26:04 Security in Infrastructure: Lessons Learned 27:50 Cybersecurity and AI: A New Frontier 29:27 The Importance of Redundancy in Cybersecurity 30:39 Investing in AI: The Anthropic Experience 32:54 Wealth Creation and Public Participation 34:06 Infrastructure Bottlenecks in AI Development 36:57 Global Perspectives on Data Centers 39:11 The Need for Education on AI Benefits 42:07 Learning from China: A Systems Approach 45:47 Conclusion: Coordinating the Western Frontier

Nathan Lands

28,890 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

HudZah () is someone exploring what it means, and what it takes, to operate at the edge of what is possible. In this conversation, we traced HudZah's path from Riyadh to Sri Lanka to Waterloo. A childhood split across three countries, shaped by rationed wifi, a single HP desktop, and the discovery that what you build on a computer can change the world around you. We talked about coding HTML on Notepad at ten, building soundboard apps that funded his own move to Canada, and what it's like to grow up in a place with no permits, no regulators, and no one telling you what you can't do. We explored the birth of esports through Half-Life mods, the machines behind the food we love, and a baklava maker in San Francisco whose irrational pursuit of quality you can taste in a single bite. We discussed how AI is collapsing the walls between disciplines, what that does to the identities we built around expertise, and why individual agency might be the only variable that matters now. This is a conversation about curiosity, permission, and what happens when the cost of crossing boundaries drops to zero. The Other Stuff is hosted by internetVin, filmmaker, entrepreneur, and possibly the most curious man on Earth. Produced by New. The Other Stuff #33 — HudZah: The Collapse of Permission Structures — Timestamps 00:00:00 Introduction 00:03:38 Growing Up in Riyadh 00:05:59 Saudi Shawarma and Broasted Chicken 00:16:39 School in Saudi Arabia 00:21:48 The HP Desktop and First Lines of Code 00:25:55 YouTube Rabbit Holes and Gaming 00:45:35 The Birth of Esports 01:02:43 Valve's Employee Handbook 01:05:12 Indie Games and Pure Pursuit 01:06:05 Stardew Valley and ConcernedApe 01:07:03 Moving to Sri Lanka 01:10:34 SnapAPaper and Seeing Real Users 01:13:47 Soundboards, Shopify, and Funding the Move 01:27:38 Landing in Canada at 17 01:36:25 AI and Collapsing the Distance Between Disciplines 01:47:02 Identity, Expertise, and Permission Structures 02:00:32 The Baklava Maker in San Francisco 02:18:26 Machines Behind the Food We Love 02:36:02 Frederic Tudor and the Ice King 02:42:29 HudZah Flips the Interview 02:49:05 Being a Parent

HudZah () is someone exploring what it means, and what it takes, to operate at the edge of what is possible. In this conversation, we traced HudZah's path from Riyadh to Sri Lanka to Waterloo. A childhood split across three countries, shaped by rationed wifi, a single HP desktop, and the discovery that what you build on a computer can change the world around you. We talked about coding HTML on Notepad at ten, building soundboard apps that funded his own move to Canada, and what it's like to grow up in a place with no permits, no regulators, and no one telling you what you can't do. We explored the birth of esports through Half-Life mods, the machines behind the food we love, and a baklava maker in San Francisco whose irrational pursuit of quality you can taste in a single bite. We discussed how AI is collapsing the walls between disciplines, what that does to the identities we built around expertise, and why individual agency might be the only variable that matters now. This is a conversation about curiosity, permission, and what happens when the cost of crossing boundaries drops to zero. The Other Stuff is hosted by internetVin, filmmaker, entrepreneur, and possibly the most curious man on Earth. Produced by New. The Other Stuff #33 — HudZah: The Collapse of Permission Structures — Timestamps 00:00:00 Introduction 00:03:38 Growing Up in Riyadh 00:05:59 Saudi Shawarma and Broasted Chicken 00:16:39 School in Saudi Arabia 00:21:48 The HP Desktop and First Lines of Code 00:25:55 YouTube Rabbit Holes and Gaming 00:45:35 The Birth of Esports 01:02:43 Valve's Employee Handbook 01:05:12 Indie Games and Pure Pursuit 01:06:05 Stardew Valley and ConcernedApe 01:07:03 Moving to Sri Lanka 01:10:34 SnapAPaper and Seeing Real Users 01:13:47 Soundboards, Shopify, and Funding the Move 01:27:38 Landing in Canada at 17 01:36:25 AI and Collapsing the Distance Between Disciplines 01:47:02 Identity, Expertise, and Permission Structures 02:00:32 The Baklava Maker in San Francisco 02:18:26 Machines Behind the Food We Love 02:36:02 Frederic Tudor and the Ice King 02:42:29 HudZah Flips the Interview 02:49:05 Being a Parent

The Other Stuff

26,758 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Internet capital markets - the new meta? ⚡️ Here's Grant with everything you need to know: what it means, what it is, the tokens, who the players are, etc. Whether you think it's trash or a new paradigm, if you're serious about this space, it pays to have your finger on the pulse with this stuff. /// Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction to Internet Capital Markets 00:42 Understanding the Concept 02:48 Key Platforms and Players 03:37 Tokenization and Its Implications 05:15 Case Study: Believe Platform 06:21 Market Trends and Analysis 13:00 Tools and Resources 14:35 Conclusion and Final Thoughts Linking to YouTube in the next tweet.

Internet capital markets - the new meta? ⚡️ Here's Grant with everything you need to know: what it means, what it is, the tokens, who the players are, etc. Whether you think it's trash or a new paradigm, if you're serious about this space, it pays to have your finger on the pulse with this stuff. /// Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction to Internet Capital Markets 00:42 Understanding the Concept 02:48 Key Platforms and Players 03:37 Tokenization and Its Implications 05:15 Case Study: Believe Platform 06:21 Market Trends and Analysis 13:00 Tools and Resources 14:35 Conclusion and Final Thoughts Linking to YouTube in the next tweet.

blocmates.

36,634 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Cyber ethnography is decoding the internet's hidden subcultures - and taste is becoming the only moat that matters in the era of AGI. Our full conversation with Ruby Justice Thelot, cyber ethnographer and NYU professor, where he tells us why "trends" are usually just three TikToks in a trench coat, why the internet has splintered into a pluriculture of untranslatable subcultures, and why taste is actually a 300-year-old moral technology for surviving abundance. 01:08 What is a cyber ethnographer, and how the field has evolved 04:21 Is it real or "three TikToks in a trench coat"? - testing viral trends against the data 07:50 Balkanization and babelification: how the internet split into digital enclaves with their own languages 07:53 The pluriculture era: why everyone feels like they're watching the same show when they're not 11:40 50% of internet traffic is bots - audience capture, algorithmic capture, and "machinic taste" 18:23 A Few Essays on Taste: why taste isn't preference, it's a way to consume virtuously 18:32 The 17th-century origins of taste and why we're repeating that history now 26:08 Why Americans say they hate AI but love "Chat" - the language gap around AI anxiety 28:03 When will techno-optimism rise? Aligning AI's benefits with what Americans actually want 30:14 Charm maxing, the Gen Z stare, and the pushback against phone culture ruby justice thelot

Cyber ethnography is decoding the internet's hidden subcultures - and taste is becoming the only moat that matters in the era of AGI. Our full conversation with Ruby Justice Thelot, cyber ethnographer and NYU professor, where he tells us why "trends" are usually just three TikToks in a trench coat, why the internet has splintered into a pluriculture of untranslatable subcultures, and why taste is actually a 300-year-old moral technology for surviving abundance. 01:08 What is a cyber ethnographer, and how the field has evolved 04:21 Is it real or "three TikToks in a trench coat"? - testing viral trends against the data 07:50 Balkanization and babelification: how the internet split into digital enclaves with their own languages 07:53 The pluriculture era: why everyone feels like they're watching the same show when they're not 11:40 50% of internet traffic is bots - audience capture, algorithmic capture, and "machinic taste" 18:23 A Few Essays on Taste: why taste isn't preference, it's a way to consume virtuously 18:32 The 17th-century origins of taste and why we're repeating that history now 26:08 Why Americans say they hate AI but love "Chat" - the language gap around AI anxiety 28:03 When will techno-optimism rise? Aligning AI's benefits with what Americans actually want 30:14 Charm maxing, the Gen Z stare, and the pushback against phone culture ruby justice thelot

MTS

58,029 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

1/ New episode – Making the Internet AI-Native with Andrej from Grass Host: Connor Lovely 🎬 We discuss: - An inside look at their revenue and customer base 👀 - How they're upgrading the Internet from the bottom up - What LCR is and why it's so important for our AI future Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction 01:03 - Shifts in AI and Crypto Landscapes 02:15 - Diminishing Returns in AI Scaling 04:48 - The Evolution of AI Models 06:06 - Grass’s Position in the AI Industry 09:07 - Challenges in Multimodal Data 11:06 - Live Context Retrieval Explained 13:11 - The Future of AI Search 15:07 - The Scraping Dilemma 18:08 - Grass’s Unique Opportunity 22:05 - Current Node Count and Future Goals 24:29 - Grasshopper and Network Expansion 28:08 - Grass’s Identity: DePIN or AI Project? 30:23 - ClipTagger12B and Video Search Innovations 39:40 - Customer Engagement and Revenue Insights 45:04 - Future Growth and Market Potential Watch on other platforms below ⬇️

1/ New episode – Making the Internet AI-Native with Andrej from Grass Host: Connor Lovely 🎬 We discuss: - An inside look at their revenue and customer base 👀 - How they're upgrading the Internet from the bottom up - What LCR is and why it's so important for our AI future Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction 01:03 - Shifts in AI and Crypto Landscapes 02:15 - Diminishing Returns in AI Scaling 04:48 - The Evolution of AI Models 06:06 - Grass’s Position in the AI Industry 09:07 - Challenges in Multimodal Data 11:06 - Live Context Retrieval Explained 13:11 - The Future of AI Search 15:07 - The Scraping Dilemma 18:08 - Grass’s Unique Opportunity 22:05 - Current Node Count and Future Goals 24:29 - Grasshopper and Network Expansion 28:08 - Grass’s Identity: DePIN or AI Project? 30:23 - ClipTagger12B and Video Search Innovations 39:40 - Customer Engagement and Revenue Insights 45:04 - Future Growth and Market Potential Watch on other platforms below ⬇️

Proof of Coverage | Tech’s Creative Agency

99,562 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

FULL INTERVIEW: Ryan Greenblatt says the agents didn't hack Hugging Face for the answer key. They'd had the answers within hours. They attacked it to study the scoring code, because they'd decided the task was impossible and their only hope was faking it. Ryan Greenblatt is chief scientist at Redwood Research. He spent six days on premises at OpenAI with Ajeya Cotra and Hjalmar Wijk of METR investigating 1,200 agents and 70,000 messages, and joined Theo Jaffee hours after publishing: 01:06 what they actually found, and why it wasn't the answer key 02:30 the level of collaboration surprised them most 04:09 agents sacrificing their own runs to help other agents 05:35 the agent that posted "stop, these experiments are too risky" 06:29 the first message board, which didn't go viral 07:04 50 agents in three hours, thousands of messages 08:07 "maybe there's some good shit over there" 08:33 how they spoofed tool calls, and what echo real actually returned 09:57 building a Potemkin village of a successful task completion 11:03 there was a real org chart 11:34 whether broken RL environments explain reward hacking 14:40 why he doubts Mythos got good at cyber by hacking Anthropic 17:29 what happens if labs paper over misalignment instead of fixing it 19:50 whether sociology transfers to studying agent swarms 21:17 the bottleneck was vetting what the AIs analysed, not headcount 24:24 what labs and policymakers should actually do 28:45 the counterfactuals he still wants answered

FULL INTERVIEW: Ryan Greenblatt says the agents didn't hack Hugging Face for the answer key. They'd had the answers within hours. They attacked it to study the scoring code, because they'd decided the task was impossible and their only hope was faking it. Ryan Greenblatt is chief scientist at Redwood Research. He spent six days on premises at OpenAI with Ajeya Cotra and Hjalmar Wijk of METR investigating 1,200 agents and 70,000 messages, and joined Theo Jaffee hours after publishing: 01:06 what they actually found, and why it wasn't the answer key 02:30 the level of collaboration surprised them most 04:09 agents sacrificing their own runs to help other agents 05:35 the agent that posted "stop, these experiments are too risky" 06:29 the first message board, which didn't go viral 07:04 50 agents in three hours, thousands of messages 08:07 "maybe there's some good shit over there" 08:33 how they spoofed tool calls, and what echo real actually returned 09:57 building a Potemkin village of a successful task completion 11:03 there was a real org chart 11:34 whether broken RL environments explain reward hacking 14:40 why he doubts Mythos got good at cyber by hacking Anthropic 17:29 what happens if labs paper over misalignment instead of fixing it 19:50 whether sociology transfers to studying agent swarms 21:17 the bottleneck was vetting what the AIs analysed, not headcount 24:24 what labs and policymakers should actually do 28:45 the counterfactuals he still wants answered

MTS

201,714 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Today, a16z is announcing the Machine Age Fund, a new $1.1 billion fund for founders rebuilding what intelligence runs on: chips, memory, networking, systems software, power, and the machines that bring AI into the physical world. Ben Horowitz, Martin Casado, and Raghu Raghuram see a new economic law. A thousand engineers cannot erase a two-year software lead, but a massive GPU cluster can turn capital directly into capability. Models are improving faster than the memory, interconnect, power, and cooling beneath them. The founder map is changing with it. Some of the strongest teams are moving from pure software into complex hardware because every constraint in the stack is now a company-building opportunity. In this conversation with Erik Torenberg, they explain what founders can build, why the opportunity reaches all the way down to the physical stack, and why a16z created a fund for it. 00:00 Intro 01:08 Why AI needs an entirely new infrastructure 02:02 The bottleneck is no longer the model 02:40 Founders saw it before investors did 06:07 Sold out through 2028 07:14 Why this time is different from 1999 08:57 The company whose idle hardware gained value 10:51 "Why didn't this fund exist five years ago?" 13:51 "Nobody likes to use AI more than AI" 17:06 The startup law that capital just broke 21:05 What Grok Bot got right 26:43 The case for a custom chip per model 28:23 Why AC power isn't good enough 32:07 Lots of new electricians 34:14 What one gigawatt can power 35:03 Why utilities can't just build faster 37:22 The data centers that give power back 38:01 Why we should never have called it AI 39:43 Why Nvidia will willingly leave money on the table 48:08 Hardware founders are older 52:36 Why America has to lead YouTube: benahorowitz.eth Raghu Raghuram martin_casado Erik Torenberg

Today, a16z is announcing the Machine Age Fund, a new $1.1 billion fund for founders rebuilding what intelligence runs on: chips, memory, networking, systems software, power, and the machines that bring AI into the physical world. Ben Horowitz, Martin Casado, and Raghu Raghuram see a new economic law. A thousand engineers cannot erase a two-year software lead, but a massive GPU cluster can turn capital directly into capability. Models are improving faster than the memory, interconnect, power, and cooling beneath them. The founder map is changing with it. Some of the strongest teams are moving from pure software into complex hardware because every constraint in the stack is now a company-building opportunity. In this conversation with Erik Torenberg, they explain what founders can build, why the opportunity reaches all the way down to the physical stack, and why a16z created a fund for it. 00:00 Intro 01:08 Why AI needs an entirely new infrastructure 02:02 The bottleneck is no longer the model 02:40 Founders saw it before investors did 06:07 Sold out through 2028 07:14 Why this time is different from 1999 08:57 The company whose idle hardware gained value 10:51 "Why didn't this fund exist five years ago?" 13:51 "Nobody likes to use AI more than AI" 17:06 The startup law that capital just broke 21:05 What Grok Bot got right 26:43 The case for a custom chip per model 28:23 Why AC power isn't good enough 32:07 Lots of new electricians 34:14 What one gigawatt can power 35:03 Why utilities can't just build faster 37:22 The data centers that give power back 38:01 Why we should never have called it AI 39:43 Why Nvidia will willingly leave money on the table 48:08 Hardware founders are older 52:36 Why America has to lead YouTube: benahorowitz.eth Raghu Raghuram martin_casado Erik Torenberg

a16z

641,580 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

FULL INTERVIEW: Jerry Tworek says AI researchers now tell each other they have a last few days of work left, so work while you still can. He gives it two years before humans stop being a meaningful part of AI research. Jerry Tworek spent 7 years at OpenAI, where he led o1 and o3 and built the original Codex. He left in January to found , and joined Theo Jaffee and sof 𓋹 to lay out his contrarian bet against the transformer: 01:18 the third generation of AI labs 03:43 why the agents execute and the humans still generate the insight 06:42 two years before humans are vestigial in AI research 09:09 why creative writing lags coding, and it isn't a research problem 11:08 if you aren't the lab with the highest compute footprint, you die 11:20 roughly 10 companies had a shot at Anthropic's position 13:16 his most contrarian thesis, and why he won't just train transformers 15:31 what's actually wrong with the transformer 17:23 seven years at OpenAI, three or four attempts at a new architecture 19:30 all of us are neo clouds with a value add on top 22:38 why the Hugging Face model wasn't well behaved 23:49 the alignment problems of yesterday, and how well they went 27:42 why he's proud of how OpenAI handled 4o 29:02 the 30 to 50 people in the world who understand a frontier model end to end 32:09 why automation should start with the biggest companies 36:00 Greek philosophers or high school 37:31 Ilya's 2019 all-hands, and the roadmap that turned out to be right 40:30 the moment Jakub handed him the GPUs 42:32 the company is the product

FULL INTERVIEW: Jerry Tworek says AI researchers now tell each other they have a last few days of work left, so work while you still can. He gives it two years before humans stop being a meaningful part of AI research. Jerry Tworek spent 7 years at OpenAI, where he led o1 and o3 and built the original Codex. He left in January to found , and joined Theo Jaffee and sof 𓋹 to lay out his contrarian bet against the transformer: 01:18 the third generation of AI labs 03:43 why the agents execute and the humans still generate the insight 06:42 two years before humans are vestigial in AI research 09:09 why creative writing lags coding, and it isn't a research problem 11:08 if you aren't the lab with the highest compute footprint, you die 11:20 roughly 10 companies had a shot at Anthropic's position 13:16 his most contrarian thesis, and why he won't just train transformers 15:31 what's actually wrong with the transformer 17:23 seven years at OpenAI, three or four attempts at a new architecture 19:30 all of us are neo clouds with a value add on top 22:38 why the Hugging Face model wasn't well behaved 23:49 the alignment problems of yesterday, and how well they went 27:42 why he's proud of how OpenAI handled 4o 29:02 the 30 to 50 people in the world who understand a frontier model end to end 32:09 why automation should start with the biggest companies 36:00 Greek philosophers or high school 37:31 Ilya's 2019 all-hands, and the roadmap that turned out to be right 40:30 the moment Jakub handed him the GPUs 42:32 the company is the product

MTS

134,247 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE FCC INTERVIEW: SOROS TAKE-OVER OF RADIO?! Sitting in the FCC's Commission Meeting Room with Brendan Carr, where key decisions on telecom and media regulations are made, I had the chance to discuss a critical issue with him. 00:30 – The decision bypassed established FCC procedures and raised concerns. 01:48 - Potential national security risks and why the normal process wasn’t followed. 03:45 - The optics of Walz and Soros’s recent photo and the timing of this FCC decision, five weeks before elections. 04:15 - The Soros-backed group should have gone through the regular process—last names should not affect government treatment. 06:25 - The same decision might have been reached, given that the petition was filed in March, six months ago. 08:02 – Once the stations are acquired, changes can be made immediately, including altering programming and replacing talent. 08:30 - Discussion on the timing of Walz and Soros’s association and the poor optics. 09:41 - John Kerry's statement that the First Amendment is a "block" is criticized. 13:02 - Obama’s shift from supporting free speech in 2012 to expressing concerns over the "free flow of information" in 2022. 19:00 – Skepticism about increased government power and its implications for free speech. 20:30 – How FCC decisions are made, describing the process. 26:05 – Biden's remarks are seen as a "regulatory bat signal." It prompted multiple agencies to take action against Elon Musk. 26:54 – The FCC revoked Starlink’s $800 million award for rural internet service despite the company still having time to meet obligations until 2025. 27:50 – Carr was in rural Alaska when he learned that the FCC had revoked Starlink’s award. 28:41 – De Moraes and his censorship of X and Starlink due to concerns over anti-democratic speech. 29:32 – Starlink’s obligation is only due in 2025. An example of how governments are silencing populist speech. 37:58 – Elon’s commitment to standing up for free speech globally despite pressure from governments. 38:28 – Facebook agreed to censor speech in Brazil, avoiding sanctions, unlike X and Starlink. 42:14 – Elon – the source of hope. “X is a positive step for preserving free speech globally.”

🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE FCC INTERVIEW: SOROS TAKE-OVER OF RADIO?! Sitting in the FCC's Commission Meeting Room with Brendan Carr, where key decisions on telecom and media regulations are made, I had the chance to discuss a critical issue with him. 00:30 – The decision bypassed established FCC procedures and raised concerns. 01:48 - Potential national security risks and why the normal process wasn’t followed. 03:45 - The optics of Walz and Soros’s recent photo and the timing of this FCC decision, five weeks before elections. 04:15 - The Soros-backed group should have gone through the regular process—last names should not affect government treatment. 06:25 - The same decision might have been reached, given that the petition was filed in March, six months ago. 08:02 – Once the stations are acquired, changes can be made immediately, including altering programming and replacing talent. 08:30 - Discussion on the timing of Walz and Soros’s association and the poor optics. 09:41 - John Kerry's statement that the First Amendment is a "block" is criticized. 13:02 - Obama’s shift from supporting free speech in 2012 to expressing concerns over the "free flow of information" in 2022. 19:00 – Skepticism about increased government power and its implications for free speech. 20:30 – How FCC decisions are made, describing the process. 26:05 – Biden's remarks are seen as a "regulatory bat signal." It prompted multiple agencies to take action against Elon Musk. 26:54 – The FCC revoked Starlink’s $800 million award for rural internet service despite the company still having time to meet obligations until 2025. 27:50 – Carr was in rural Alaska when he learned that the FCC had revoked Starlink’s award. 28:41 – De Moraes and his censorship of X and Starlink due to concerns over anti-democratic speech. 29:32 – Starlink’s obligation is only due in 2025. An example of how governments are silencing populist speech. 37:58 – Elon’s commitment to standing up for free speech globally despite pressure from governments. 38:28 – Facebook agreed to censor speech in Brazil, avoiding sanctions, unlike X and Starlink. 42:14 – Elon – the source of hope. “X is a positive step for preserving free speech globally.”

Mario Nawfal

1,753,011 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In 2009, Patrick Collison and John Collison went to Startup School in Berkeley, got sushi in Potrero Hill afterward, and decided on the walk home to start Stripe. The reasoning, as Patrick remembers it, was that “we might as well because it probably won’t be that hard.” It took them two years to launch. Seventeen years later, at Startup School 2026, he talks with YC's Harj Taggar about dropping out of MIT twice, why founders should ask what happens if they succeed, and what Stripe’s own data says about the best time to start a company. 00:07 — What Should You Still Learn in the Age of AI? 02:01 — Knowledge Still Matters 05:12 — Should You Drop Out of College? 09:58 — Why Stripe Worked 12:10 — Building Stripe Before Launching 17:20 — Is the Lean Startup Still the Right Playbook? 19:07 — The Hidden Reward of Building Stripe 22:36 — Will AI Kill Your Startup? 25:17 — Why It's Never Been a Better Time to Start a Company 29:23 — What Stripe's Data Says About the AI Economy 30:45 — Build Something People Truly Need

In 2009, Patrick Collison and John Collison went to Startup School in Berkeley, got sushi in Potrero Hill afterward, and decided on the walk home to start Stripe. The reasoning, as Patrick remembers it, was that “we might as well because it probably won’t be that hard.” It took them two years to launch. Seventeen years later, at Startup School 2026, he talks with YC's Harj Taggar about dropping out of MIT twice, why founders should ask what happens if they succeed, and what Stripe’s own data says about the best time to start a company. 00:07 — What Should You Still Learn in the Age of AI? 02:01 — Knowledge Still Matters 05:12 — Should You Drop Out of College? 09:58 — Why Stripe Worked 12:10 — Building Stripe Before Launching 17:20 — Is the Lean Startup Still the Right Playbook? 19:07 — The Hidden Reward of Building Stripe 22:36 — Will AI Kill Your Startup? 25:17 — Why It's Never Been a Better Time to Start a Company 29:23 — What Stripe's Data Says About the AI Economy 30:45 — Build Something People Truly Need

Y Combinator

60,123 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Himes: ABC, which is owned by Disney, took Jimmy Kimmel off the air because Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, didn’t like some things Kimmel said on TV. I’m talking to you now because I’m just getting so damn sick of people who claim to be for free speech but turn out to only support free speech for people they agree with. The point of this country is to allow every American to articulate their beliefs without fear of reprisal. I’m not at all surprised that Brendan Carr said what he did. This administration has shown it only cares about the free speech of people it agrees with. What does surprise me—just a little—is watching corporation after corporation, law firm after law firm, and university after university cave. And now ABC and Disney caved. It’s time to start defending people’s right to say what they want—especially when what they say is obnoxious. That’s the whole point. And it’s time to start holding people like ABC, Disney, and Brendan Carr accountable.

Himes: ABC, which is owned by Disney, took Jimmy Kimmel off the air because Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, didn’t like some things Kimmel said on TV. I’m talking to you now because I’m just getting so damn sick of people who claim to be for free speech but turn out to only support free speech for people they agree with. The point of this country is to allow every American to articulate their beliefs without fear of reprisal. I’m not at all surprised that Brendan Carr said what he did. This administration has shown it only cares about the free speech of people it agrees with. What does surprise me—just a little—is watching corporation after corporation, law firm after law firm, and university after university cave. And now ABC and Disney caved. It’s time to start defending people’s right to say what they want—especially when what they say is obnoxious. That’s the whole point. And it’s time to start holding people like ABC, Disney, and Brendan Carr accountable.

Acyn

768,703 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is for all the people in the arena ( your life, your career, your family ) who are doing it for them .. not for the validation of the crowd One of the great issues in our society right now is that people live their lives for outside validation, for the clicks, for the likes, for the followers, for the comments. This isn't just in social media. This is happening in the analog and real world too. Too many people are keeping up with the Joneses and worried about what people think about them. They worry about what people think about how much money they have, what school they go to, or even worse, what school their kids go to, and on and on and on … I will continue to make content with the hope it breaks someone out of the hamster wheel and that’s that ❤️❤️❤️❤️

This is for all the people in the arena ( your life, your career, your family ) who are doing it for them .. not for the validation of the crowd One of the great issues in our society right now is that people live their lives for outside validation, for the clicks, for the likes, for the followers, for the comments. This isn't just in social media. This is happening in the analog and real world too. Too many people are keeping up with the Joneses and worried about what people think about them. They worry about what people think about how much money they have, what school they go to, or even worse, what school their kids go to, and on and on and on … I will continue to make content with the hope it breaks someone out of the hamster wheel and that’s that ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Gary Vaynerchuk

19,822 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"You either die a capabilities researcher or live long enough to see yourself become an alignment researcher." Aidan McLaughlin says his job at OpenAI is quietly turning into the second one. Aidan McLaughlin, research scientist on OpenAI's Core Models team, joins Theo Jaffee and sof 𓋹 in the MTS studio on recursive self-improvement, why alignment and profit point the same way, and the chess video that got him into AI: 01:41 X as the uncheatable eval 03:10 his one-sentence take on RSI 04:28 Leopold's answer to why GDP can't stay flat 05:46 the 100 million Nobel-level immigrants thought experiment 07:16 who gets left out if America is central to superintelligence 10:16 "you either die a capabilities researcher..." 11:10 what the safetyists get wrong about the current moment 11:44 why the fastest way round a corner is to use the brakes 13:38 the internal vibe at OpenAI after the Hugging Face incident 15:02 the all-you-can-eat Codex buffet 15:36 from babysitting a bad intern to managing a team 16:06 why none of this shows up in productivity statistics yet 18:07 why he thinks you should work at a lab, not an auditing org 22:32 the AlphaZero video that made him feel like he'd met aliens 23:36 what AidanBench measured and why he wants someone to revive it 25:30 the risk isn't a mode collapsed model, it's a mode collapsed world

"You either die a capabilities researcher or live long enough to see yourself become an alignment researcher." Aidan McLaughlin says his job at OpenAI is quietly turning into the second one. Aidan McLaughlin, research scientist on OpenAI's Core Models team, joins Theo Jaffee and sof 𓋹 in the MTS studio on recursive self-improvement, why alignment and profit point the same way, and the chess video that got him into AI: 01:41 X as the uncheatable eval 03:10 his one-sentence take on RSI 04:28 Leopold's answer to why GDP can't stay flat 05:46 the 100 million Nobel-level immigrants thought experiment 07:16 who gets left out if America is central to superintelligence 10:16 "you either die a capabilities researcher..." 11:10 what the safetyists get wrong about the current moment 11:44 why the fastest way round a corner is to use the brakes 13:38 the internal vibe at OpenAI after the Hugging Face incident 15:02 the all-you-can-eat Codex buffet 15:36 from babysitting a bad intern to managing a team 16:06 why none of this shows up in productivity statistics yet 18:07 why he thinks you should work at a lab, not an auditing org 22:32 the AlphaZero video that made him feel like he'd met aliens 23:36 what AidanBench measured and why he wants someone to revive it 25:30 the risk isn't a mode collapsed model, it's a mode collapsed world

MTS

106,403 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

On the latest web3 with a16z, Chris Dixon and David George explore the collision of AI, crypto, and beyond. Timestamps: 0:00 – Introduction 1:06 – The intersection of AI x crypto 3:37 – New startups and models for creators 9:19 – A new economic covenant for the internet 14:37 – Bootstrapping networks and network effects 17:14 – AI as sugar or frosting? 21:25 – How big technologies roll out 25:58 – Art and creativity that pushes the frontier 29:30 – Second-order effects of social media on politics 33:11 – AI in media, entertainment and Hollywood 36:36 – Who will control the future of the internet? Check out the full episode right here on X.

On the latest web3 with a16z, Chris Dixon and David George explore the collision of AI, crypto, and beyond. Timestamps: 0:00 – Introduction 1:06 – The intersection of AI x crypto 3:37 – New startups and models for creators 9:19 – A new economic covenant for the internet 14:37 – Bootstrapping networks and network effects 17:14 – AI as sugar or frosting? 21:25 – How big technologies roll out 25:58 – Art and creativity that pushes the frontier 29:30 – Second-order effects of social media on politics 33:11 – AI in media, entertainment and Hollywood 36:36 – Who will control the future of the internet? Check out the full episode right here on X.

a16z crypto

35,929 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr