Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Fulton County Sheriff's office pulled over a jolly driver and his wife, Mrs. Claus, while they were on their way to surprise children at their daughter's place of work. The department confirmed on Facebook that "No coal was issued — just a friendly reminder that even sleighs need to... show more

CBS News

8,892,864 subscribers

30,307 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

SANTA SLOWDOWN: Deputies in Ohio pulled over Santa Claus for speeding while he and Mrs. Claus were on their way to surprise children. The jolly driver was given a warning to maintain the speed limit on the roads instead of a ticket.

SANTA SLOWDOWN: Deputies in Ohio pulled over Santa Claus for speeding while he and Mrs. Claus were on their way to surprise children. The jolly driver was given a warning to maintain the speed limit on the roads instead of a ticket.

Fox News

194,885 views • 6 months ago

A man who says he was the person of interest being questioned in the kidnapping of Nancy Guthrie has been released. The man, who only wants to be identified as Carlos, said he was detained after a traffic stop. Carlos said he was shocked when he was pulled over and didn't know who Guthrie is. "I'm innocent," he said, adding that he hopes the suspect is found soon so his name could be cleared. Authorities haven't confirmed that Carlos was the person of interest or that the person of interest has been released. CBS News has reached out to the Pima County Sheriff's Department and the FBI about Carlos.

A man who says he was the person of interest being questioned in the kidnapping of Nancy Guthrie has been released. The man, who only wants to be identified as Carlos, said he was detained after a traffic stop. Carlos said he was shocked when he was pulled over and didn't know who Guthrie is. "I'm innocent," he said, adding that he hopes the suspect is found soon so his name could be cleared. Authorities haven't confirmed that Carlos was the person of interest or that the person of interest has been released. CBS News has reached out to the Pima County Sheriff's Department and the FBI about Carlos.

CBS News

50,600 views • 5 months ago

Kathleen Thomas, who was pulled over by a Palm Beach County Sheriff's deputy and was issued a citation in February for allegedly using a phone with a right hand she doesn't have, now tells CBS News' Cristian Benavides that she doesn't believe that the officer wanted to be "mean" but hopes the viral encounter can spark a broader conversation about limb difference and how interactions with people who look different can have unintended emotional impacts. “For every one of me there’s several others that that could destroy their entire day.”

Kathleen Thomas, who was pulled over by a Palm Beach County Sheriff's deputy and was issued a citation in February for allegedly using a phone with a right hand she doesn't have, now tells CBS News' Cristian Benavides that she doesn't believe that the officer wanted to be "mean" but hopes the viral encounter can spark a broader conversation about limb difference and how interactions with people who look different can have unintended emotional impacts. “For every one of me there’s several others that that could destroy their entire day.”

CBS News

30,402 views • 1 month ago

A father on his way to his daughter’s graduation was pulled over by an officer who suspected he was intoxicated. He cooperated and took a roadside breath test — it showed 0.00. Despite that, he was arrested and taken into custody, causing him to miss the ceremony. Later blood tests confirmed he was completely sober. A moment he’ll never get back.

A father on his way to his daughter’s graduation was pulled over by an officer who suspected he was intoxicated. He cooperated and took a roadside breath test — it showed 0.00. Despite that, he was arrested and taken into custody, causing him to miss the ceremony. Later blood tests confirmed he was completely sober. A moment he’ll never get back.

Brandon

18,297 views • 4 months ago

Officer holds man at gunpoint that does not fit description of the person he is looking for. Officer Kerzaya was called out to this hotel as a white man pulled a gun on the hotel staff. As the officer was searching the premises he ran into Trey an employee of the hotel and also African American. The officer proceeded to pull his firearm on and hold Trey at gun point for a number of minutes. The whole time Trey had his hands up and was eventually on his knees. Once verified Trey was an employee all he said to him was get out of here. Next this officer pulled his gun on another person in the hotel that also did not fit the description. The officer resigned from duty as his certification was stripped from him. Trey filed suit against the city and pulled in a settlement.

Officer holds man at gunpoint that does not fit description of the person he is looking for. Officer Kerzaya was called out to this hotel as a white man pulled a gun on the hotel staff. As the officer was searching the premises he ran into Trey an employee of the hotel and also African American. The officer proceeded to pull his firearm on and hold Trey at gun point for a number of minutes. The whole time Trey had his hands up and was eventually on his knees. Once verified Trey was an employee all he said to him was get out of here. Next this officer pulled his gun on another person in the hotel that also did not fit the description. The officer resigned from duty as his certification was stripped from him. Trey filed suit against the city and pulled in a settlement.

Chuckling Charlie

45,180 views • 2 months ago

There’s no winner here. This man got pulled over in a routine traffic stop. He disclosed to the officers that he had a concealed carry permit. During what was a routine pat down he was accidentally shot by the female officer? With what looks like his own weapon. Who was in the wrong here? Or was it simply just an accident?

There’s no winner here. This man got pulled over in a routine traffic stop. He disclosed to the officers that he had a concealed carry permit. During what was a routine pat down he was accidentally shot by the female officer? With what looks like his own weapon. Who was in the wrong here? Or was it simply just an accident?

AmyLouWho

78,318 views • 5 months ago

The King County Auditor's Officer released a new report Tuesday that found that there was not proper oversight over tens of millions of dollars by the King County Parks Department. KOMO News spoke with King County Council Vice Chair Reagan Dunn about his reactions to the audit.

The King County Auditor's Officer released a new report Tuesday that found that there was not proper oversight over tens of millions of dollars by the King County Parks Department. KOMO News spoke with King County Council Vice Chair Reagan Dunn about his reactions to the audit.

KOMO News

49,072 views • 5 months ago

Tyrant cop meets his match when he stops a man that is well versed in the law. The verbal take down after the stop is glorious. While traveling on a road trip to deliver two work trucks, these drivers were pulled over by the Nevada Highway Patrol for allegedly speeding. But the real confrontation began when the trooper ordered the trailing driver to pull up in front of his partner's truck, citing "officer safety." The driver stood his ground, refusing to move his vehicle and demanding the trooper quote the specific legal code that requires a citizen to comply with a safety procedure rather than a codified law. Having his ego crushed, the officer ensures that the driver was leaving with a citation. The tension only escalated from there as the driver demanded the troopers verbally identify themselves for the camera, sparking a back-and-forth over policy versus the law. Once the stop was over, the driver was not letting tht tyrant off easy as he followed them to their cars and undressed their behavior as well as schooled them on the law. What's your feelings on this? Who was justified in their actions, the driver or the trooper?

Tyrant cop meets his match when he stops a man that is well versed in the law. The verbal take down after the stop is glorious. While traveling on a road trip to deliver two work trucks, these drivers were pulled over by the Nevada Highway Patrol for allegedly speeding. But the real confrontation began when the trooper ordered the trailing driver to pull up in front of his partner's truck, citing "officer safety." The driver stood his ground, refusing to move his vehicle and demanding the trooper quote the specific legal code that requires a citizen to comply with a safety procedure rather than a codified law. Having his ego crushed, the officer ensures that the driver was leaving with a citation. The tension only escalated from there as the driver demanded the troopers verbally identify themselves for the camera, sparking a back-and-forth over policy versus the law. Once the stop was over, the driver was not letting tht tyrant off easy as he followed them to their cars and undressed their behavior as well as schooled them on the law. What's your feelings on this? Who was justified in their actions, the driver or the trooper?

Giggling Ganon

38,007 views • 4 days ago

This guy just rips into this officer. 😳 Anyone that ever had a bad day only to be iced off by getting pulled over? That seems to be where this guy is right here. He says just about everything that someone wants to say on a day like that, but usually we do not. He also brings up an interesting debate.. The law says he must present his ID and technically he is presenting it. Does that mean he needed to hand it to the officer or was he legal in what he did?

This guy just rips into this officer. 😳 Anyone that ever had a bad day only to be iced off by getting pulled over? That seems to be where this guy is right here. He says just about everything that someone wants to say on a day like that, but usually we do not. He also brings up an interesting debate.. The law says he must present his ID and technically he is presenting it. Does that mean he needed to hand it to the officer or was he legal in what he did?

Giggling Ganon

179,752 views • 3 months ago

🇬🇭 Ralph the activist confronted a truck driver who stopped at a red traffic light and got down to urinate on the road. The incident, witnessed by Ralph who was driving behind the truck, led him to alert a police officer on a motorbike, who pulled the driver over.

🇬🇭 Ralph the activist confronted a truck driver who stopped at a red traffic light and got down to urinate on the road. The incident, witnessed by Ralph who was driving behind the truck, led him to alert a police officer on a motorbike, who pulled the driver over.

CDR AFRICA

304,065 views • 5 months ago

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,300 views • 1 month ago

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Karoline Leavitt just EVISCERATED the Fake News and Democrats for lying about the patriot Minneapolis ICE agent "Who was WRONG? The Democrat Party and the mainstream media, who DESPICABLY have been LYING about this officer and about this case from the very beginning!" "And they have had to CHANGE their story and their narrative." "Because at first, you heard Democrats, including the mayor of Minneapolis, saying that the car never struck the officer and the lethal force was unjustified." "Now, of course, there is plentiful video evidence to show that the officer was struck by the car, that this deranged, lunatic woman was trying to ram him over with her vehicle and was using that vehicle as a weapon, which justifies domestic terrorism." 💯 They lie RELENTLESSLY.

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Karoline Leavitt just EVISCERATED the Fake News and Democrats for lying about the patriot Minneapolis ICE agent "Who was WRONG? The Democrat Party and the mainstream media, who DESPICABLY have been LYING about this officer and about this case from the very beginning!" "And they have had to CHANGE their story and their narrative." "Because at first, you heard Democrats, including the mayor of Minneapolis, saying that the car never struck the officer and the lethal force was unjustified." "Now, of course, there is plentiful video evidence to show that the officer was struck by the car, that this deranged, lunatic woman was trying to ram him over with her vehicle and was using that vehicle as a weapon, which justifies domestic terrorism." 💯 They lie RELENTLESSLY.

Eric Daugherty

120,717 views • 6 months ago

Footage of an officer (the same one who pulled him out of his vehicle) forcibly taking a handcuffed Tyreek Hill to the ground Hill was asked to sit. He replies that he’ll comply, but he just had surgery on his knee. The officer came from offscreen to “redirect” him to the ground

Footage of an officer (the same one who pulled him out of his vehicle) forcibly taking a handcuffed Tyreek Hill to the ground Hill was asked to sit. He replies that he’ll comply, but he just had surgery on his knee. The officer came from offscreen to “redirect” him to the ground

Marcel Louis-Jacques

1,394,927 views • 1 year ago

Here it is: Fulton County, Georgia, November 3, 2020 — the crime scene on the Georgia Senate floor. • We know there were 3,930 double-scanned ballots in Fulton County. • We know that 39,000 Fulton County residents who had filed a National Change of Address form with the U.S. Post Office voted in the 2020 election. • We know that 84% of those 39,000 were ineligible to vote in that election, either by their own admission or through the filing of a new voter registration. • We know 315,000 ballots did not maintain a proper chain of custody. • We know that thousands of ballot images are missing. • We know that those 3,930 double-scanned ballots were processed knowingly, intentionally, and maliciously. And as a bonus: Gabriel Sterling, the Chief Operating Officer in the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, was shocked to receive a piece of mail—addressed to the previous homeowner, who had moved out of state, sent by Fair Fight. The letter reminded that out-of-state individual to return a ballot that had been requested by mail. Sterling conducted his own investigation and discovered that this individual, who had moved out of state, voted in the 2020 presidential election illegally. That vote was counted, It was re-scanned and counted again in the recount. And it was counted in the hand count. 📝Fulton County was so corrupt that they had to hire a prostitute who was banging her own prostitute and, in fact, was double-scanned to the District Attorney’s office herself —no less—just to try to cover it up.

Here it is: Fulton County, Georgia, November 3, 2020 — the crime scene on the Georgia Senate floor. • We know there were 3,930 double-scanned ballots in Fulton County. • We know that 39,000 Fulton County residents who had filed a National Change of Address form with the U.S. Post Office voted in the 2020 election. • We know that 84% of those 39,000 were ineligible to vote in that election, either by their own admission or through the filing of a new voter registration. • We know 315,000 ballots did not maintain a proper chain of custody. • We know that thousands of ballot images are missing. • We know that those 3,930 double-scanned ballots were processed knowingly, intentionally, and maliciously. And as a bonus: Gabriel Sterling, the Chief Operating Officer in the Georgia Secretary of State’s office, was shocked to receive a piece of mail—addressed to the previous homeowner, who had moved out of state, sent by Fair Fight. The letter reminded that out-of-state individual to return a ballot that had been requested by mail. Sterling conducted his own investigation and discovered that this individual, who had moved out of state, voted in the 2020 presidential election illegally. That vote was counted, It was re-scanned and counted again in the recount. And it was counted in the hand count. 📝Fulton County was so corrupt that they had to hire a prostitute who was banging her own prostitute and, in fact, was double-scanned to the District Attorney’s office herself —no less—just to try to cover it up.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

14,749 views • 3 months ago

This woman was pulled over on the side of the road, so a cop stopped to check on her. She claimed her daughter was having a fit and that was why she pulled over. The officer said she had flat tires but she didn’t seem to recognize that. What’s obvious is the slur in her voice. It’s either alcohol or possibly prescription drugs. It’s a shame she got into the vehicle with children like that. What should the punishment be? Don’t drive under the influence!

This woman was pulled over on the side of the road, so a cop stopped to check on her. She claimed her daughter was having a fit and that was why she pulled over. The officer said she had flat tires but she didn’t seem to recognize that. What’s obvious is the slur in her voice. It’s either alcohol or possibly prescription drugs. It’s a shame she got into the vehicle with children like that. What should the punishment be? Don’t drive under the influence!

Suzee Q

108,228 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING: A Springfield, Ohio man claims he saw Haitian migrants in a van catching cats, and they later admitted to the police that they were eating them. "We've lost a whole bunch of cats." "A van pulled over, and it had over 100 cats in it with the Haitians." "They said they was eating them." "I watched them get pulled over with the cats and admit to the police that they was eating them." Can we get a fact-check, ABC News?

BREAKING: A Springfield, Ohio man claims he saw Haitian migrants in a van catching cats, and they later admitted to the police that they were eating them. "We've lost a whole bunch of cats." "A van pulled over, and it had over 100 cats in it with the Haitians." "They said they was eating them." "I watched them get pulled over with the cats and admit to the police that they was eating them." Can we get a fact-check, ABC News?

KanekoaTheGreat

2,226,518 views • 1 year ago

This dude took over the parking spot that the local PD likes to radar from and the officers can't handle it. It's like a child that got their favorite toy taken away. We are in Henrico County for this one. You have a citizen journalist that is aware of the favorite parking spot that the local PD loves to post up at to conduct speed traps. The journalist took over the parking spot minutes before the officer and let's just say, the officers was lost on what to do about it. The attempt by the officer he pulled up behind the parked vehicle of the journalists. Officer James approached the driver’s side window, standard protocol and tried to turn things into a welfare check, and requested that the driver roll down the glass. Right from the jump, the driver established his boundary: he flatly refused to roll down the window, asserting through the glass that he could hear the officer perfectly fine. Recognizing a non-standard situation, Officer James immediately called for backup ("Code 2") while attempting fish for something to escalate the situation and turn this into a traffic stop. He began by asking if the journalist was broken down, experiencing a medical emergency, or in need of assistance. What followed was a clinic on how to handle the police through awkward silence. Instead of speaking, the driver responded to the officer's safety inquiries exclusively with thumbs-up gestures through the closed window. The interaction hit a snag when Officer James questioned why the journalist was stopped in a turn lane. While the driver refused to answer out loud to the officer, he later pointed his camera to show the layout of the road. The journalist showed he wasn't blocking a turn lane at all; he was parked on an asphalt cutout next to the turn lane—an area that is frequently used for overflow parking. Realizing he was not getting anywhere, the officer went back to his car for one last ditch effort by running the plates of the journalist. Once things came back clean the officer had to do that walk of shame and left. The encounter didn't end there, though. A second officer, Officer Jennings, arrived shortly after also looking to park in the spot to conduct a speed trap. Interestingly, the driver shifted strategies for the second interaction. Rather than sticking to the silent thumbs-up routine, the driver chose to verbally engage with Officer Jennings through the glass. He explicitly confirmed that he was completely fine, did not require any emergency help, and was simply sitting there. Once again another walk of shame when the officer came up empty handed from his fishing exercise. It's amusing to see these officers have to basically pack up their toys and go home because they could not use their favorite radar spot.

This dude took over the parking spot that the local PD likes to radar from and the officers can't handle it. It's like a child that got their favorite toy taken away. We are in Henrico County for this one. You have a citizen journalist that is aware of the favorite parking spot that the local PD loves to post up at to conduct speed traps. The journalist took over the parking spot minutes before the officer and let's just say, the officers was lost on what to do about it. The attempt by the officer he pulled up behind the parked vehicle of the journalists. Officer James approached the driver’s side window, standard protocol and tried to turn things into a welfare check, and requested that the driver roll down the glass. Right from the jump, the driver established his boundary: he flatly refused to roll down the window, asserting through the glass that he could hear the officer perfectly fine. Recognizing a non-standard situation, Officer James immediately called for backup ("Code 2") while attempting fish for something to escalate the situation and turn this into a traffic stop. He began by asking if the journalist was broken down, experiencing a medical emergency, or in need of assistance. What followed was a clinic on how to handle the police through awkward silence. Instead of speaking, the driver responded to the officer's safety inquiries exclusively with thumbs-up gestures through the closed window. The interaction hit a snag when Officer James questioned why the journalist was stopped in a turn lane. While the driver refused to answer out loud to the officer, he later pointed his camera to show the layout of the road. The journalist showed he wasn't blocking a turn lane at all; he was parked on an asphalt cutout next to the turn lane—an area that is frequently used for overflow parking. Realizing he was not getting anywhere, the officer went back to his car for one last ditch effort by running the plates of the journalist. Once things came back clean the officer had to do that walk of shame and left. The encounter didn't end there, though. A second officer, Officer Jennings, arrived shortly after also looking to park in the spot to conduct a speed trap. Interestingly, the driver shifted strategies for the second interaction. Rather than sticking to the silent thumbs-up routine, the driver chose to verbally engage with Officer Jennings through the glass. He explicitly confirmed that he was completely fine, did not require any emergency help, and was simply sitting there. Once again another walk of shame when the officer came up empty handed from his fishing exercise. It's amusing to see these officers have to basically pack up their toys and go home because they could not use their favorite radar spot.

Giggling Ganon

1,025,804 views • 1 month ago

Dude rips into tyrant officer who lied about the reason he pulled him over. The video starts with Officer Nablo pulling over a motorcyclist right outside his own home. Right out of the gate, the officer asks didn't you hear me when I was trying to pull you over? The rider said no, because he has a Bluetooth speaker in his helmet. The officer falsely claims having helmet speakers is illegal (spoiler: it’s not). So this was off to a wonderful start. When the rider directly asks, "Why are you pulling me over first?" the officer completely deflects, stating it's simply "to ID who you are." That is a massive red flag. Officers need reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to initiate a traffic stop—they cannot just pull you over to demand papers and see who you are. It isn't until long after the confrontation begins, after the officer has already demanded ID, that he walks to the back of the motorcycle to look for a retroactive justification. He then tries to claim that the plate has to be visible and says he can't see the plate. The rider pushes back calling out it officer for lying. After getting the ID and running the plate the officer did happen to get lucky as he discovered the vehicle registration expired , meaning it is expired. The rider immediately calls out the absolute hypocrisy and shifting narrative: The officer first claimed he couldn't see the license plate at all. Yet, the officer simultaneously claimed he pulled the rider over because he knew the registration on that very plate was expired. How can you pull someone over for an expired plate that you just admitted you couldn't even see until after you detached him from the bike? It makes zero sense. Failure to Yield or Safe Stopping Point? Officer Nablo tries to claim the rider was "failing to yield" and evading the stop because he didn't pull over the exact second the lights went on. However, the rider stands his ground, explaining that he did not flee; he simply continued riding a short distance to his own home where he felt safe and where he had multiple security cameras recording the interaction. This doesn't seem to be a random encounter, either. The rider alleges a disturbing pattern of personal harassment from Officer Nablo, claiming this exact same officer previously came onto his property and threatened to shoot his dog just for barking inside the house. Eventually, a supervisor/sergeant steps in to de-escalate the hostile officer. The supervisor confirms that the citations for the expired registration will be sent by mail and that the rider has 10 days to contest them. When the rider demands to file a formal complaint for harassment, the supervisor instructs him that individual officer complaints must be taken up directly with the Chief of Police. The rider made it clear this is going straight to court and social media. What do you think? Was this officer legitimately enforcing traffic laws, or was he a tyrant fishing for a reason to flex his badge?

Dude rips into tyrant officer who lied about the reason he pulled him over. The video starts with Officer Nablo pulling over a motorcyclist right outside his own home. Right out of the gate, the officer asks didn't you hear me when I was trying to pull you over? The rider said no, because he has a Bluetooth speaker in his helmet. The officer falsely claims having helmet speakers is illegal (spoiler: it’s not). So this was off to a wonderful start. When the rider directly asks, "Why are you pulling me over first?" the officer completely deflects, stating it's simply "to ID who you are." That is a massive red flag. Officers need reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to initiate a traffic stop—they cannot just pull you over to demand papers and see who you are. It isn't until long after the confrontation begins, after the officer has already demanded ID, that he walks to the back of the motorcycle to look for a retroactive justification. He then tries to claim that the plate has to be visible and says he can't see the plate. The rider pushes back calling out it officer for lying. After getting the ID and running the plate the officer did happen to get lucky as he discovered the vehicle registration expired , meaning it is expired. The rider immediately calls out the absolute hypocrisy and shifting narrative: The officer first claimed he couldn't see the license plate at all. Yet, the officer simultaneously claimed he pulled the rider over because he knew the registration on that very plate was expired. How can you pull someone over for an expired plate that you just admitted you couldn't even see until after you detached him from the bike? It makes zero sense. Failure to Yield or Safe Stopping Point? Officer Nablo tries to claim the rider was "failing to yield" and evading the stop because he didn't pull over the exact second the lights went on. However, the rider stands his ground, explaining that he did not flee; he simply continued riding a short distance to his own home where he felt safe and where he had multiple security cameras recording the interaction. This doesn't seem to be a random encounter, either. The rider alleges a disturbing pattern of personal harassment from Officer Nablo, claiming this exact same officer previously came onto his property and threatened to shoot his dog just for barking inside the house. Eventually, a supervisor/sergeant steps in to de-escalate the hostile officer. The supervisor confirms that the citations for the expired registration will be sent by mail and that the rider has 10 days to contest them. When the rider demands to file a formal complaint for harassment, the supervisor instructs him that individual officer complaints must be taken up directly with the Chief of Police. The rider made it clear this is going straight to court and social media. What do you think? Was this officer legitimately enforcing traffic laws, or was he a tyrant fishing for a reason to flex his badge?

Giggling Ganon

712,810 views • 11 days ago

Drone manufacturer says the only reason to fly drones at night is to look for something, suggests the NJ drones could be looking for a nuclear bomb from Ukraine. “Back in the 1980s, Ronald Reagan had dismantled the nuclear program… I believe there were over 80 nuclear warheads that were in Ukraine that came up missing.” “I spoke to a gentleman a few months ago who was trying to raise an alarm to the highest levels of our government, which they had their ears closed about this one particular nuclear warhead that he physically put his hands on.” “He physically touched this warhead that was left over from Ukraine, and he knew that that thing was headed towards the United States…” Video: john.ferguson88 on TT

Drone manufacturer says the only reason to fly drones at night is to look for something, suggests the NJ drones could be looking for a nuclear bomb from Ukraine. “Back in the 1980s, Ronald Reagan had dismantled the nuclear program… I believe there were over 80 nuclear warheads that were in Ukraine that came up missing.” “I spoke to a gentleman a few months ago who was trying to raise an alarm to the highest levels of our government, which they had their ears closed about this one particular nuclear warhead that he physically put his hands on.” “He physically touched this warhead that was left over from Ukraine, and he knew that that thing was headed towards the United States…” Video: john.ferguson88 on TT

Collin Rugg

468,966 views • 1 year ago