正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Fun Fact: Forrest Gump (1994) – Forrest & Jenny The bench scenes between Forrest and Jenny were filmed with minimal rehearsal so that Tom Hanks (Forrest) and Robin Wright (Jenny) could keep the emotions raw and unpolished. Director Robert Zemeckis wanted their relationship to feel unpredictable, reflecting how Jenny... show more

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

200,679 subscribers

242,872 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

In Forrest Gump, Jenny is the master manipulator. She keeps drifting in and out of Forrest’s life, making selfish choices that often hurt him. When Forrest meets his son for the first time and asks, “Is he smart?” That line, added late in production, wasn’t in the script.

In Forrest Gump, Jenny is the master manipulator. She keeps drifting in and out of Forrest’s life, making selfish choices that often hurt him. When Forrest meets his son for the first time and asks, “Is he smart?” That line, added late in production, wasn’t in the script.

Emir Han

2,163,276 次观看 • 3 个月前

Robin Wright said Jenny from Forrest Gump was never a villain “People called her Voldemort. I wouldn’t say that. “I don’t think it’s a punishment that she gets AIDS.” “She was just flighty and running and doing coke and hooking up with a Black Panther.”

Robin Wright said Jenny from Forrest Gump was never a villain “People called her Voldemort. I wouldn’t say that. “I don’t think it’s a punishment that she gets AIDS.” “She was just flighty and running and doing coke and hooking up with a Black Panther.”

Emir Han

70,127 次观看 • 4 个月前

💔 Forrest Gump — the moment Jenny introduces Forrest to his son This scene is quiet, simple, and absolutely devastating. Forrest’s first reaction isn’t joy or shock — it’s fear. He asks if his son is smart, because all he’s ever known is being told he wasn’t. In just a few lines, the movie hits on love, insecurity, and generational healing. It’s one of the most human moments in cinema — proof that sometimes the strongest scenes don’t need speeches, just honesty.

💔 Forrest Gump — the moment Jenny introduces Forrest to his son This scene is quiet, simple, and absolutely devastating. Forrest’s first reaction isn’t joy or shock — it’s fear. He asks if his son is smart, because all he’s ever known is being told he wasn’t. In just a few lines, the movie hits on love, insecurity, and generational healing. It’s one of the most human moments in cinema — proof that sometimes the strongest scenes don’t need speeches, just honesty.

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

336,612 次观看 • 6 个月前

🎥 This movie almost lost EVERYTHING… Tom Hanks only agreed to Forrest Gump after 90 minutes — but on one condition: keep it real. Then the studio cut $10M… and tried to remove the most important scenes. So Hanks and the director took a huge risk… They gave up their salaries. It paid off BIG — he later made $70M 🤯

🎥 This movie almost lost EVERYTHING… Tom Hanks only agreed to Forrest Gump after 90 minutes — but on one condition: keep it real. Then the studio cut $10M… and tried to remove the most important scenes. So Hanks and the director took a huge risk… They gave up their salaries. It paid off BIG — he later made $70M 🤯

Oma James🇺🇸

500,139 次观看 • 3 个月前

During the filming of "Forrest Gump," director Bob Zemeckis realized he had a problem: The kid cast to play the young Forrest had a thick accent—sounding nothing like the way Tom Hanks was portraying the adult Forrest. Hanks' simple solution would define the iconic character: "Bob said, 'We got a problem here, you have to teach this kid how to talk the way you talk,'" Hanks says. "And I thought, 'Why don't I just talk the way he talks?'" The kid was from Mississippi and had a thick Southern accent. The iconic Forrest Gump accent and mannerisms were simply a result of Tom Hanks imitating the kid. Takeaway 1: The iconic characterization of Forrest Gump was a solution to a problem. Creativity is often forced out of necessity like this. The iconic POV scenes in Jaws, for instance, were also a solution to a problem: the mechanical shark broke. So director Steven Spielberg had no choice but to film the movie without his main character. Takeaway 2: One of the hottest actors in Hollywood, Hanks could have demanded they find another kid or that the kid figure out how to sound like Hanks. Instead, Hanks adapted and adopted the kid’s speech and mannerisms. Jerry Seinfeld talks about how great artists are like slalom skiers. “I always say, ‘If I’m the skier Lindsey Vonn, I don’t care where you put the gates on the mountain. Put ‘em anywhere you want. I’m going to make the gates.’” Seinfeld continues, "That’s how you have to think: ‘I don’t care what happens, I’m going to adjust to it.’” - - - "Creativity and adaptability are inseparable." — Robert Greene Follow Billy Oppenheimer for more content like this!

During the filming of "Forrest Gump," director Bob Zemeckis realized he had a problem: The kid cast to play the young Forrest had a thick accent—sounding nothing like the way Tom Hanks was portraying the adult Forrest. Hanks' simple solution would define the iconic character: "Bob said, 'We got a problem here, you have to teach this kid how to talk the way you talk,'" Hanks says. "And I thought, 'Why don't I just talk the way he talks?'" The kid was from Mississippi and had a thick Southern accent. The iconic Forrest Gump accent and mannerisms were simply a result of Tom Hanks imitating the kid. Takeaway 1: The iconic characterization of Forrest Gump was a solution to a problem. Creativity is often forced out of necessity like this. The iconic POV scenes in Jaws, for instance, were also a solution to a problem: the mechanical shark broke. So director Steven Spielberg had no choice but to film the movie without his main character. Takeaway 2: One of the hottest actors in Hollywood, Hanks could have demanded they find another kid or that the kid figure out how to sound like Hanks. Instead, Hanks adapted and adopted the kid’s speech and mannerisms. Jerry Seinfeld talks about how great artists are like slalom skiers. “I always say, ‘If I’m the skier Lindsey Vonn, I don’t care where you put the gates on the mountain. Put ‘em anywhere you want. I’m going to make the gates.’” Seinfeld continues, "That’s how you have to think: ‘I don’t care what happens, I’m going to adjust to it.’” - - - "Creativity and adaptability are inseparable." — Robert Greene Follow Billy Oppenheimer for more content like this!

Billy Oppenheimer

2,729,073 次观看 • 3 年前

"It feels like if you took Uncut Gems and mashed it with Forrest Gump, this is the movie that would come out." – Seton O'Connor DP and the Danettes give their reviews of Marty Supreme 🍿

"It feels like if you took Uncut Gems and mashed it with Forrest Gump, this is the movie that would come out." – Seton O'Connor DP and the Danettes give their reviews of Marty Supreme 🍿

Dan Patrick Show

43,214 次观看 • 7 个月前

The new Robert Zemeckis film “Here” uses a lot of generative AI. Starring Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, it shows a couple living through multiple decades. AI for de-aging the actors was preferable to usual techniques: ▫️Make-up: Takes hour to put on and can make actors look 10 years younger (but not 50 as the film requires) ▫️CGI: Expensive and long (per NYT, “Persuading us that we’re watching Hanks and Wright in their 20s would have required hundreds of VFX artists, tens of millions of dollars and months of postproduction work.”) Zemeckis says “Here” couldn’t have been made three years ago (its $50m budget wouldn’t be able to afford the CGI). Also by using generative AI, Hanks and Wright could act more naturally without thick make-up (or those CGI dots) on their face. The AI effects were done by Metaphysics (the company’s content head is Ed Ulbrich, the former CEO of Digital Domain, James Cameron’s FX firm). Metaphysics AI tools were particularly useful because of how much video and images there are of Hanks and Wright over the decades. Some of those images include 1994’s “Forrest Gump”, which was also directed by Zemeckis starring Hanks and Wright. That banger used a lot of advanced aging effects for the time and won the 1995 Best Visual Effects Oscar. *** More from NYT: “Here” featurette:

The new Robert Zemeckis film “Here” uses a lot of generative AI. Starring Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, it shows a couple living through multiple decades. AI for de-aging the actors was preferable to usual techniques: ▫️Make-up: Takes hour to put on and can make actors look 10 years younger (but not 50 as the film requires) ▫️CGI: Expensive and long (per NYT, “Persuading us that we’re watching Hanks and Wright in their 20s would have required hundreds of VFX artists, tens of millions of dollars and months of postproduction work.”) Zemeckis says “Here” couldn’t have been made three years ago (its $50m budget wouldn’t be able to afford the CGI). Also by using generative AI, Hanks and Wright could act more naturally without thick make-up (or those CGI dots) on their face. The AI effects were done by Metaphysics (the company’s content head is Ed Ulbrich, the former CEO of Digital Domain, James Cameron’s FX firm). Metaphysics AI tools were particularly useful because of how much video and images there are of Hanks and Wright over the decades. Some of those images include 1994’s “Forrest Gump”, which was also directed by Zemeckis starring Hanks and Wright. That banger used a lot of advanced aging effects for the time and won the 1995 Best Visual Effects Oscar. *** More from NYT: “Here” featurette:

Trung Phan

270,472 次观看 • 1 年前

‘Back to the Future’ director ‘Robert Zemeckis’ uses AI in his new film ‘Here’ with ‘Tom Hanks’ and ‘Robin Wright’. Check out the making of below with a big should out to Magnific.ai 👏 visual effects by DNEG who also worked on #Dune

‘Back to the Future’ director ‘Robert Zemeckis’ uses AI in his new film ‘Here’ with ‘Tom Hanks’ and ‘Robin Wright’. Check out the making of below with a big should out to Magnific.ai 👏 visual effects by DNEG who also worked on #Dune

Jeff_synthesized

20,252 次观看 • 1 年前

The Epstein documents also mentioned actor Tom Hanks who has been named by numerous people for crimes against children. Hanks also mocked the death of actor Isaac Kappy, who was known for exposing the elite child trafficking rings in Hollywood and one of the people who exposed Hanks before his own untimely death. President Trump himself has hinted to you that Tom Hanks was no good when West Point canceled the award ceremony for actor Tom Hanks. That was no accident. Even in the movie Forrest Gump, when Jenny leaves waving from the back of the bus, Hanks purposely pays homage to Satanism, by doing the hand gesture of "As above, so below," in which the Baphomet statue that represents Satanism gestures itself. There are NO coincidences. Symbolism will be their downfall, and it was. Now that the cards are faced up on the table, it's time to prosecute these child predators.

The Epstein documents also mentioned actor Tom Hanks who has been named by numerous people for crimes against children. Hanks also mocked the death of actor Isaac Kappy, who was known for exposing the elite child trafficking rings in Hollywood and one of the people who exposed Hanks before his own untimely death. President Trump himself has hinted to you that Tom Hanks was no good when West Point canceled the award ceremony for actor Tom Hanks. That was no accident. Even in the movie Forrest Gump, when Jenny leaves waving from the back of the bus, Hanks purposely pays homage to Satanism, by doing the hand gesture of "As above, so below," in which the Baphomet statue that represents Satanism gestures itself. There are NO coincidences. Symbolism will be their downfall, and it was. Now that the cards are faced up on the table, it's time to prosecute these child predators.

Whiplash347

854,470 次观看 • 6 个月前

The most prominent example of a film that was financially viable because of generative AI was “Here” by Robert Zemeckis. Starring Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, it shows a couple living through multiple decades. The film’s budget was ~$50m and wouldn’t be able to cover traditional process for de-aging: ▫️Make-up: Takes hour to put on and can make actors look 10 years younger (but not 50 as the film requires) ▫️CGI: Expensive and long (per NYT, “Persuading us that we’re watching Hanks and Wright in their 20s would have required hundreds of VFX artists, tens of millions of dollars and months of postproduction work.”) Zemeckis says “Here” was able to be made in 2024 but not in 2021 (due to CGI costs). Also by using generative AI, Hanks and Wright could act more naturally without thick make-up (or those CGI dots) on their face. The AI effects were done by Metaphysics (the company’s content head is Ed Ulbrich, the former CEO of Digital Domain, James Cameron’s FX firm). Metaphysics AI tools were particularly useful because of how much video and images there are of Hanks and Wright over the decades (won’t be the case for all actors). Some of those images include 1994’s “Forrest Gump”, which was also directed by Zemeckis starring Hanks and Wright. That banger used a lot of advanced aging effects for the time and won the 1995 Best Visual Effects Oscar. A best case scenario might be instead of a studio spending $200m for a single blockbuster, it could finance and staff up 4 films at $50m (which could reach same visual quality bar using new tech). *** More from NYT: “Here” featurette:

The most prominent example of a film that was financially viable because of generative AI was “Here” by Robert Zemeckis. Starring Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, it shows a couple living through multiple decades. The film’s budget was ~$50m and wouldn’t be able to cover traditional process for de-aging: ▫️Make-up: Takes hour to put on and can make actors look 10 years younger (but not 50 as the film requires) ▫️CGI: Expensive and long (per NYT, “Persuading us that we’re watching Hanks and Wright in their 20s would have required hundreds of VFX artists, tens of millions of dollars and months of postproduction work.”) Zemeckis says “Here” was able to be made in 2024 but not in 2021 (due to CGI costs). Also by using generative AI, Hanks and Wright could act more naturally without thick make-up (or those CGI dots) on their face. The AI effects were done by Metaphysics (the company’s content head is Ed Ulbrich, the former CEO of Digital Domain, James Cameron’s FX firm). Metaphysics AI tools were particularly useful because of how much video and images there are of Hanks and Wright over the decades (won’t be the case for all actors). Some of those images include 1994’s “Forrest Gump”, which was also directed by Zemeckis starring Hanks and Wright. That banger used a lot of advanced aging effects for the time and won the 1995 Best Visual Effects Oscar. A best case scenario might be instead of a studio spending $200m for a single blockbuster, it could finance and staff up 4 films at $50m (which could reach same visual quality bar using new tech). *** More from NYT: “Here” featurette:

Trung Phan

677,857 次观看 • 8 个月前

Two Asian elephants, Shirley and Jenny, spent one winter together in 1973 at a circus in the United States. Shirley was a fully grown adult of about 25. Jenny was a young calf, just arrived from Sumatra. They were separated when the season ended. Shirley went on with the circus. Jenny was sold elsewhere. Twenty-two years later, both worn out and injured, they ended up retired to the same sanctuary in Tennessee. Different decades, different states, different owners in between. They had not seen each other since Jenny was a baby. The night Jenny was led into the barn next to Shirley’s stall, she became frantic to get closer. The two of them trumpeted, roared, and reached for each other so hard they bent the steel bars between them. The staff opened the gate. Shirley took on a mother role and the two became inseparable for the next seven years until Jenny passed. Elephants have the largest brain of any animal that walks on land. The hippocampus, the part of the brain that handles memory, is enormous in elephants relative to their body size. They can pick out the bones of a dead relative decades later by smell. A study in 2024 found they use distinct vocal sounds as names for each other, the way we do. So when people say an elephant never forgets, it isn’t a saying. They’ve actually been measuring it.

Two Asian elephants, Shirley and Jenny, spent one winter together in 1973 at a circus in the United States. Shirley was a fully grown adult of about 25. Jenny was a young calf, just arrived from Sumatra. They were separated when the season ended. Shirley went on with the circus. Jenny was sold elsewhere. Twenty-two years later, both worn out and injured, they ended up retired to the same sanctuary in Tennessee. Different decades, different states, different owners in between. They had not seen each other since Jenny was a baby. The night Jenny was led into the barn next to Shirley’s stall, she became frantic to get closer. The two of them trumpeted, roared, and reached for each other so hard they bent the steel bars between them. The staff opened the gate. Shirley took on a mother role and the two became inseparable for the next seven years until Jenny passed. Elephants have the largest brain of any animal that walks on land. The hippocampus, the part of the brain that handles memory, is enormous in elephants relative to their body size. They can pick out the bones of a dead relative decades later by smell. A study in 2024 found they use distinct vocal sounds as names for each other, the way we do. So when people say an elephant never forgets, it isn’t a saying. They’ve actually been measuring it.

Lemma the Optimist

128,539 次观看 • 3 个月前

Gavin Newsom claims that he didn’t know about his family ties to Oppenheimer or communism growing up. Dana Bash called his willful ignorance “Forrest Gump-esque” right to his face. BASH: “Your great grandfather was very good friends with Oppenheimer. And J. Edgar Hoover got a file on them.” NEWSOM: “Got a big file on him and you know, and it was at the house and and following them and impacted his career. Impacted his future, and also impacted the family and impacted you know, so their way of living and seeing the world.” BASH: “But you never knew any of this?” NEWSOM: “Didn’t know any of this.” “I mean, it was there were vague hints of it but it was never—” BASH: “I have to say there’s kind of a Forrest Gump-esque notion to this because it’s, you know whether it’s Oppenheimer, you learn that your grandmother went to the Soviet Union.” “I mean they were communists.”

Gavin Newsom claims that he didn’t know about his family ties to Oppenheimer or communism growing up. Dana Bash called his willful ignorance “Forrest Gump-esque” right to his face. BASH: “Your great grandfather was very good friends with Oppenheimer. And J. Edgar Hoover got a file on them.” NEWSOM: “Got a big file on him and you know, and it was at the house and and following them and impacted his career. Impacted his future, and also impacted the family and impacted you know, so their way of living and seeing the world.” BASH: “But you never knew any of this?” NEWSOM: “Didn’t know any of this.” “I mean, it was there were vague hints of it but it was never—” BASH: “I have to say there’s kind of a Forrest Gump-esque notion to this because it’s, you know whether it’s Oppenheimer, you learn that your grandmother went to the Soviet Union.” “I mean they were communists.”

Overton

1,423,081 次观看 • 5 个月前

Has technological change given rise to envy? Forrest Maready (Forrest Maready) joins me to discuss his recent book, The Age of Envy: 1848-Present. (1:37) Forrest’s background in the film, television, and advertising industries (11:58) What happened in 1848? (15:52) How the steam-powered printing press changed history (17:58) Technology brought inequality to light, giving rise to envy (24:56) Envy is at the center of leftism In the second half (available to subscribers), we explore whether envy is inevitable, given how natural inequality is. This leads to a consideration of democracy and how it measures up to pre-democratic political systems. I argue that while we must be pragmatic – there’s no bringing back monarchy – we should be honest about how mass democracy impedes certain political reforms. Shifting gears, Forrest discusses the concept of post-truth. How can nations continue to exist when people have widely different conceptions of reality? We wrap up the show by pondering if envy will destroy civilization—or if there’s a way out of the madness.

Has technological change given rise to envy? Forrest Maready (Forrest Maready) joins me to discuss his recent book, The Age of Envy: 1848-Present. (1:37) Forrest’s background in the film, television, and advertising industries (11:58) What happened in 1848? (15:52) How the steam-powered printing press changed history (17:58) Technology brought inequality to light, giving rise to envy (24:56) Envy is at the center of leftism In the second half (available to subscribers), we explore whether envy is inevitable, given how natural inequality is. This leads to a consideration of democracy and how it measures up to pre-democratic political systems. I argue that while we must be pragmatic – there’s no bringing back monarchy – we should be honest about how mass democracy impedes certain political reforms. Shifting gears, Forrest discusses the concept of post-truth. How can nations continue to exist when people have widely different conceptions of reality? We wrap up the show by pondering if envy will destroy civilization—or if there’s a way out of the madness.

Patrick Casey

41,988 次观看 • 1 年前

I think this is one of my favorite videos of Jenny and Amy! The facial expressions during their play bout! SO STINKING CUTE! Also a good video to show you naysayers who repeatedly claim we pull all the bears teeth out so we can interact with them. LOL. Errr, no…..and besides bears have a huge paws and claws too right? Haha

I think this is one of my favorite videos of Jenny and Amy! The facial expressions during their play bout! SO STINKING CUTE! Also a good video to show you naysayers who repeatedly claim we pull all the bears teeth out so we can interact with them. LOL. Errr, no…..and besides bears have a huge paws and claws too right? Haha

Orphaned Wildlife

22,856 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jacob Tierney discussing Hudson Williams and Connor Storrie’s chemistry and relationship in recent interview with MSignorile@bsky.social “One of the most amazing things to watch was this bond between them and how much they were looking out for each other. (…) We got so lucky, not only are they wonderful actors, but their relationship made it so that I could do things that I wasn’t sure I could do.” 🔗

Jacob Tierney discussing Hudson Williams and Connor Storrie’s chemistry and relationship in recent interview with [email protected] “One of the most amazing things to watch was this bond between them and how much they were looking out for each other. (…) We got so lucky, not only are they wonderful actors, but their relationship made it so that I could do things that I wasn’t sure I could do.” 🔗

Hudson Williams Updates

69,911 次观看 • 6 个月前

They were silenced for questioning the "safe & effective" narrative. Katie Couric was spanked. Sharyl Attkisson was reprimanded. Jenny McCarthy was forced to shut up on network television. What happened to the journalists? Jenny McCarthy exposes the systemic silencing of those who dared to ask about vaccine safety. She raises the urgent question: How many have been pressured or paid to stay silent? This is a rallying cry. Stand with the brave truth-tellers. Stand on each other's shoulders and amplify the questions they don't want asked. We must keep shouting, together.

They were silenced for questioning the "safe & effective" narrative. Katie Couric was spanked. Sharyl Attkisson was reprimanded. Jenny McCarthy was forced to shut up on network television. What happened to the journalists? Jenny McCarthy exposes the systemic silencing of those who dared to ask about vaccine safety. She raises the urgent question: How many have been pressured or paid to stay silent? This is a rallying cry. Stand with the brave truth-tellers. Stand on each other's shoulders and amplify the questions they don't want asked. We must keep shouting, together.

Camus

114,508 次观看 • 10 个月前

I've known and talked with Jesse Ridgway for years as a fellow creator, and my heart goes out to him and his wife during this incredibly difficult time. They recently shared the deeply personal decision they had to make regarding their pregnancy. It's a situation that brings up a lot of emotions and perspectives. I wanted to share this here because we've all followed their journey for so long. Let's keep the conversation respectful in the comments

I've known and talked with Jesse Ridgway for years as a fellow creator, and my heart goes out to him and his wife during this incredibly difficult time. They recently shared the deeply personal decision they had to make regarding their pregnancy. It's a situation that brings up a lot of emotions and perspectives. I wanted to share this here because we've all followed their journey for so long. Let's keep the conversation respectful in the comments

Karim Jovian

23,164 次观看 • 2 个月前

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has announced that a criminal investigation has been launched into Andrew and Tristan Tate, following their arriving in Florida recently after fleeing from their legal case in Romania, with him stating, “These guys have themselves publicly admitted to participating in what very much appears to be soliciting, trafficking, preying upon women around the world — some of them minors.” Forrest Saunders

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has announced that a criminal investigation has been launched into Andrew and Tristan Tate, following their arriving in Florida recently after fleeing from their legal case in Romania, with him stating, “These guys have themselves publicly admitted to participating in what very much appears to be soliciting, trafficking, preying upon women around the world — some of them minors.” Forrest Saunders

OSINTdefender

455,606 次观看 • 1 年前