Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇺🇦 FUNGI EATS RADIATION, GROWS FASTER INSIDE CHERNOBYL Scientists just found something growing where nothing should: the walls of Chernobyl. A black fungus called Cladosporium sphaerospermum isn’t just surviving nuclear radiation—it’s feeding on it. Like photosynthesis but for gamma rays, researchers call it “radiosynthesis.” The kicker: the more radiation... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,848,827 subscribers

246,731 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When Light Becomes Heavy Enough to Trap Itself Can light collapse into a black hole? In General Relativity, light is not weightless in the geometric sense. It has energy, it carries momentum, and energy curves Spacetime. A Vaidya-type collapse describes a mass that grows because radiation is falling inward. The mathematics is the same brutal idea behind Einstein’s equation Gᵤᵥ = 8πTᵤᵥ If the stress-energy Tᵤᵥ is made from radiation, then light itself becomes a source of curvature. As more radiation falls inward, the mass aspect grows, the Spacetime fabric tightens, and a clean black horizon appears where escaping paths begin to fail. #GeneralRelativity #EinsteinEquations #BlackHole #Spacetime #Astrophysics #TheoreticalPhysics #Light #Mathematics #Science

When Light Becomes Heavy Enough to Trap Itself Can light collapse into a black hole? In General Relativity, light is not weightless in the geometric sense. It has energy, it carries momentum, and energy curves Spacetime. A Vaidya-type collapse describes a mass that grows because radiation is falling inward. The mathematics is the same brutal idea behind Einstein’s equation Gᵤᵥ = 8πTᵤᵥ If the stress-energy Tᵤᵥ is made from radiation, then light itself becomes a source of curvature. As more radiation falls inward, the mass aspect grows, the Spacetime fabric tightens, and a clean black horizon appears where escaping paths begin to fail. #GeneralRelativity #EinsteinEquations #BlackHole #Spacetime #Astrophysics #TheoreticalPhysics #Light #Mathematics #Science

Mathelirium

27,760 views • 2 months ago

WHY THE WORLD’S WORST NUCLEAR DISASTER WON’T HAPPEN AGAIN Chernobyl blew up because people could literally turn off the safety systems. No joke. Modern reactors? You can’t just flip a switch and cause chaos. They shut themselves down automatically if something goes wrong - and operators can’t override it. Also, today’s reactors sit inside giant radiation-proof fortresses of concrete and steel. Even if something leaks, it’s not getting out. Chernobyl was a disaster. It was also a lesson the nuclear industry learned the hard way - and they don’t want a sequel. Source: Viral Maniacs

WHY THE WORLD’S WORST NUCLEAR DISASTER WON’T HAPPEN AGAIN Chernobyl blew up because people could literally turn off the safety systems. No joke. Modern reactors? You can’t just flip a switch and cause chaos. They shut themselves down automatically if something goes wrong - and operators can’t override it. Also, today’s reactors sit inside giant radiation-proof fortresses of concrete and steel. Even if something leaks, it’s not getting out. Chernobyl was a disaster. It was also a lesson the nuclear industry learned the hard way - and they don’t want a sequel. Source: Viral Maniacs

Mario Nawfal

305,095 views • 8 months ago

We asked Standard Nuclear CEO Kurt Terrani about the nuclear myth that bothers him most: "There is radiation going through me right now, and there's radiation going through you right now. That's called natural background radiation. We all get it." "When you go take a flight, you get a little bit more. When you go to the dentist or the chest X-ray, you get a lot more. A lot more certainly than I experience day-to-day at a nuclear fuel plant." "Take arsenic. Below 200 parts per billion is safe. So 250 parts per billion is toxic. You pour a little clean water into it, bring it down below 200. We're hydrated, we're high-fiving, we're happy." "But with radiation, no, no, no. It's the only thing that somehow anything above zero is bad, and we ignore the fact that it's naturally all around us. It's not just archaic, it's wrong."

We asked Standard Nuclear CEO Kurt Terrani about the nuclear myth that bothers him most: "There is radiation going through me right now, and there's radiation going through you right now. That's called natural background radiation. We all get it." "When you go take a flight, you get a little bit more. When you go to the dentist or the chest X-ray, you get a lot more. A lot more certainly than I experience day-to-day at a nuclear fuel plant." "Take arsenic. Below 200 parts per billion is safe. So 250 parts per billion is toxic. You pour a little clean water into it, bring it down below 200. We're hydrated, we're high-fiving, we're happy." "But with radiation, no, no, no. It's the only thing that somehow anything above zero is bad, and we ignore the fact that it's naturally all around us. It's not just archaic, it's wrong."

MTS

47,174 views • 4 months ago

Scientists just dropped a brutal truth bomb: Even with today’s best tech, no human would survive on Mars longer than ~4 years Why? The radiation is absolutely vicious. After roughly four years, the cumulative dose crosses the "you’re definitely getting cancer or worse" line. Your spaceship can shield you on the journey there and back, but here’s the kicker: once you’re on the surface, there’s no practical way to block it. Pile on too much shielding? Paradoxically makes it worse — thick metal walls actually create secondary radiation showers that fry you even faster.NASA still wants boots on Mars by the 2030s… but yeah, good luck with that lifetime limit. BLACK HOLE. Follow for more cosmic bad news.

Scientists just dropped a brutal truth bomb: Even with today’s best tech, no human would survive on Mars longer than ~4 years Why? The radiation is absolutely vicious. After roughly four years, the cumulative dose crosses the "you’re definitely getting cancer or worse" line. Your spaceship can shield you on the journey there and back, but here’s the kicker: once you’re on the surface, there’s no practical way to block it. Pile on too much shielding? Paradoxically makes it worse — thick metal walls actually create secondary radiation showers that fry you even faster.NASA still wants boots on Mars by the 2030s… but yeah, good luck with that lifetime limit. BLACK HOLE. Follow for more cosmic bad news.

Night Sky Now

156,042 views • 9 months ago

Scientists just dropped a brutal truth bomb: Even with today’s best tech, no human would survive on Mars longer than ~4 years Why? The radiation is absolutely vicious. After roughly four years, the cumulative dose crosses the "you’re definitely getting cancer or worse" line. Your spaceship can shield you on the journey there and back, but here’s the kicker: once you’re on the surface, there’s no practical way to block it. Pile on too much shielding? Paradoxically makes it worse — thick metal walls actually create secondary radiation showers that fry you even faster.NASA still wants boots on Mars by the 2030s… but yeah, good luck with that lifetime limit. BLACK HOLE. Follow for more cosmic bad news.

Scientists just dropped a brutal truth bomb: Even with today’s best tech, no human would survive on Mars longer than ~4 years Why? The radiation is absolutely vicious. After roughly four years, the cumulative dose crosses the "you’re definitely getting cancer or worse" line. Your spaceship can shield you on the journey there and back, but here’s the kicker: once you’re on the surface, there’s no practical way to block it. Pile on too much shielding? Paradoxically makes it worse — thick metal walls actually create secondary radiation showers that fry you even faster.NASA still wants boots on Mars by the 2030s… but yeah, good luck with that lifetime limit. BLACK HOLE. Follow for more cosmic bad news.

Black Hole

1,487,143 views • 9 months ago

Does the sun now feel like it’s shining through a magnifying glass? Does it feel extremely hot on your face and skin? It is. How high is the UV radiation? View the actual tests in the video. As I state in this clip, we are told by all major agencies that no more than 5% of all UV radiation should be UVB. Here is an exact quote from the National Library of Medicine: “The UV component of terrestrial radiation from the midday sun comprises about 95% UVA and 5% UVB; UVC and most of UVB are removed from extraterrestrial radiation by stratospheric ozone”. In reality (as confirmed by UV metering) we are actually getting as much as 55% to 60% UVB on the surface. This means that we are seeing UVB levels that are up to 1000% or more above what is being officially disclosed. Follow us for more:

Does the sun now feel like it’s shining through a magnifying glass? Does it feel extremely hot on your face and skin? It is. How high is the UV radiation? View the actual tests in the video. As I state in this clip, we are told by all major agencies that no more than 5% of all UV radiation should be UVB. Here is an exact quote from the National Library of Medicine: “The UV component of terrestrial radiation from the midday sun comprises about 95% UVA and 5% UVB; UVC and most of UVB are removed from extraterrestrial radiation by stratospheric ozone”. In reality (as confirmed by UV metering) we are actually getting as much as 55% to 60% UVB on the surface. This means that we are seeing UVB levels that are up to 1000% or more above what is being officially disclosed. Follow us for more:

Dane Wigington

14,880,959 views • 1 year ago

⚠️ Is Russia preparing its “Flying Chernobyl”? The aggressor’s terrifying new superweapon Aircraft used to track missile trajectories and measure radiation have been deployed to Novaya Zemlya, home to Russia’s main nuclear testing site — just as they were ahead of previous tests of the nuclear-powered Burevestnik missile. In the West, it has been dubbed the “Flying Chernobyl”: an accident involving the missile could potentially spread radioactive contamination over a vast area. And accidents are hardly unheard of — nearly all 13 Burevestnik tests conducted between 2017 and 2019 ended in failure. Putin later claimed “successful” launches in 2023 and 2025, but what happened to the missile afterward was never shown.

⚠️ Is Russia preparing its “Flying Chernobyl”? The aggressor’s terrifying new superweapon Aircraft used to track missile trajectories and measure radiation have been deployed to Novaya Zemlya, home to Russia’s main nuclear testing site — just as they were ahead of previous tests of the nuclear-powered Burevestnik missile. In the West, it has been dubbed the “Flying Chernobyl”: an accident involving the missile could potentially spread radioactive contamination over a vast area. And accidents are hardly unheard of — nearly all 13 Burevestnik tests conducted between 2017 and 2019 ended in failure. Putin later claimed “successful” launches in 2023 and 2025, but what happened to the missile afterward was never shown.

NEXTA

91,869 views • 23 days ago

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in new interview on orbital datacenters: "We have 24/7 solar. We've got all that idle power. I want to evacuate it as fast as possible; There's no conduction, no convection. Just radiation. But space is big, and we're just gonna put giant radiators out there. I've sent engineers to go work on the problem. We're learning a lot about it. How do we deal with radiation, degrading performance, continuous testing, redundancy, degrade."

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in new interview on orbital datacenters: "We have 24/7 solar. We've got all that idle power. I want to evacuate it as fast as possible; There's no conduction, no convection. Just radiation. But space is big, and we're just gonna put giant radiators out there. I've sent engineers to go work on the problem. We're learning a lot about it. How do we deal with radiation, degrading performance, continuous testing, redundancy, degrade."

Sawyer Merritt

252,366 views • 5 months ago

Nothing to see where, just Senator Doug Mastriano, bringing forward his bill for the clean air preservation act - designed to eliminate solar radiation modification and Geo engineering in Pennsylvania. People actually still call it a conspiracy, despite the hundreds and thousands of daily new clips coming out showing it happening each day.

Nothing to see where, just Senator Doug Mastriano, bringing forward his bill for the clean air preservation act - designed to eliminate solar radiation modification and Geo engineering in Pennsylvania. People actually still call it a conspiracy, despite the hundreds and thousands of daily new clips coming out showing it happening each day.

Concerned Citizen

24,170 views • 9 months ago

🚨Interesting Fact: Orion Artemis II Space shuttle is literally NASA’s first 🚀 testbed for human shielding through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts – they’re gathering real sensor data now so future crews don’t get fried later.🧐 🌌🛰️ “We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.” --Orion’s uncrewed flight climbed 3,600 miles up, past ISS altitude, straight into the Van Allen radiation belts to stress‑test new shielding and log radiation with onboard sensors.😱 🚀Radiation here can wreck guidance, computers, and electronics, so NASA is using this mission to harden the spacecraft before committing human crews to deep space runs to asteroids or Mars. 🛰️Funny enough, Apollo astronauts later admitted they weren’t even sure if they went far enough to hit the belts – but now NASA’s openly saying the quiet part out loud and designing around it. 🧠💥 Space isn’t just “exploration,” it’s an active radiation lab now – and Orion is the guinea pig so future astronauts don’t have to be.

🚨Interesting Fact: Orion Artemis II Space shuttle is literally NASA’s first 🚀 testbed for human shielding through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts – they’re gathering real sensor data now so future crews don’t get fried later.🧐 🌌🛰️ “We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.” --Orion’s uncrewed flight climbed 3,600 miles up, past ISS altitude, straight into the Van Allen radiation belts to stress‑test new shielding and log radiation with onboard sensors.😱 🚀Radiation here can wreck guidance, computers, and electronics, so NASA is using this mission to harden the spacecraft before committing human crews to deep space runs to asteroids or Mars. 🛰️Funny enough, Apollo astronauts later admitted they weren’t even sure if they went far enough to hit the belts – but now NASA’s openly saying the quiet part out loud and designing around it. 🧠💥 Space isn’t just “exploration,” it’s an active radiation lab now – and Orion is the guinea pig so future astronauts don’t have to be.

#SeekingTheTruth JoshWhoX

30,548 views • 5 months ago

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in new interview on orbital datacenters: "The challenge of course is that cooling, you can't take advantage of conduction and convection, so you can only use radiation, and radiation requires very large surfaces, but that's not an impossible things to solve. There's a lot of space in space. We're going to go explore it. We're already radiation hardened. We have Cuda in satellites around the world. In the meantime, we're going to explore what is the architecture of datacenters look like in space. It'll take years, but that's ok. I got time." via The All-In Podcast

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in new interview on orbital datacenters: "The challenge of course is that cooling, you can't take advantage of conduction and convection, so you can only use radiation, and radiation requires very large surfaces, but that's not an impossible things to solve. There's a lot of space in space. We're going to go explore it. We're already radiation hardened. We have Cuda in satellites around the world. In the meantime, we're going to explore what is the architecture of datacenters look like in space. It'll take years, but that's ok. I got time." via The All-In Podcast

Sawyer Merritt

1,268,303 views • 6 months ago

SF just got nuke scanned ahead of Super Bowl Sunday by a helicopter equipped with the National Nuclear Security Administration's Aerial Measuring System (AMS). This is actually routine in US cities ahead of major events. The helicopters fly a tight grid pattern over the city, and onboard detectors measure radiation and look for unexpected spikes above normal background radiation. The AMS needs helicopters - rather than planes - because they can fly low altitudes (radiation detection drops off quickly with distance). We scan for nukes in cities for presidential inaugurations, the Olympics, and other major events. We even did it along the West Coast after the Fukushima incident to check for elevated radiation levels.

SF just got nuke scanned ahead of Super Bowl Sunday by a helicopter equipped with the National Nuclear Security Administration's Aerial Measuring System (AMS). This is actually routine in US cities ahead of major events. The helicopters fly a tight grid pattern over the city, and onboard detectors measure radiation and look for unexpected spikes above normal background radiation. The AMS needs helicopters - rather than planes - because they can fly low altitudes (radiation detection drops off quickly with distance). We scan for nukes in cities for presidential inaugurations, the Olympics, and other major events. We even did it along the West Coast after the Fukushima incident to check for elevated radiation levels.

TBPN

35,643 views • 7 months ago

In 1998, Pakistan tested nuclear bombs in Chaghi, #Balochistan The fuel used was enriched uranium. Pakistan used uranium to power the nuclear tests in Ras Koh hills. When uranium explodes, it releases harmful radiation into the ground, air, and water. Even underground tests can leak radioactive material into soil and groundwater. After the tests, leftover uranium and radioactive waste were likely buried in the region without proper safety. The land in Ras Koh has remained toxic ever since. Radiation exposure from uranium causes cancer, organ failure, and genetic mutations. Contaminated water and soil poison crops, livestock, and people. Children are born with severe birth defects. The radiation stays active for thousands of years. Pakistan’s nuclear weapons use highly enriched uranium or plutonium as fissile material. Uranium didn’t just explode in Chaghi, it settled into the earth, seeped into water, and air and causing diseases like cancer. #NukeAftermathInBalochistan

In 1998, Pakistan tested nuclear bombs in Chaghi, #Balochistan The fuel used was enriched uranium. Pakistan used uranium to power the nuclear tests in Ras Koh hills. When uranium explodes, it releases harmful radiation into the ground, air, and water. Even underground tests can leak radioactive material into soil and groundwater. After the tests, leftover uranium and radioactive waste were likely buried in the region without proper safety. The land in Ras Koh has remained toxic ever since. Radiation exposure from uranium causes cancer, organ failure, and genetic mutations. Contaminated water and soil poison crops, livestock, and people. Children are born with severe birth defects. The radiation stays active for thousands of years. Pakistan’s nuclear weapons use highly enriched uranium or plutonium as fissile material. Uranium didn’t just explode in Chaghi, it settled into the earth, seeped into water, and air and causing diseases like cancer. #NukeAftermathInBalochistan

Dur Bibi

19,009 views • 1 year ago

CAC Coronary Artery Calcium Scan: New Heart Disease Test Causes Cancer. Major Organizations Warn Public Against It... 42 Of Every 100K Patients Develop Cancer From Ionizing Radiation. Radiation Dosage Varies 10X From One Hospital To Another, Causing 5,600 New Cases Of Cancer. The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology & the United States Preventive Services Task Force do not recommend the use of heart CT scans for patients with a low or high risk of heart disease because CT scans could be more harmful than beneficial due to the relatively high dose of radiation. "Tens of millions of adults would be exposed to relatively high levels of radiation through this procedure. Doctors still have not established a standard dose of radiation to be used for heart CT scans & doses for this test vary from one hospital to another, with some patients getting 10X the amount of radiation as patients in another hospital." A 2009 study showed that one heart CT scan for the 50 million Americans who would receive the average radiation dose, these scans would result in 5,600 new cancer cases. The number of new cancer cases would be even higher if individuals were screened more than once in their lifetime. Radiation from CT scans is even of concern to the FDA even when the CT scans are necessary. On October 9, 2009, the FDA announced that it was notifying healthcare professionals that 206 patients who were being tested for stroke received CT radiation doses that were 8X the expected level at one particular medical facility. While this event involved a single kind of diagnostic test at one facility, the FDA warned that “it reflects more widespread problems with CT quality assurance programs.” Each year, over 600,000 Americans die from heart disease even though heart disease can be prevented. Although heart CT scanning may be a useful tool in detecting blockages in heart arteries, there is not enough evidence to show that this test is worth the risks, especially compared to traditional risk factor assessment. For this reason, the Cancer Prevention & Treatment Fund of the National Research Center for Women & Families agrees with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that heart CT scans are not recommended for screening for heart disease. 👇CAC Screening Radiation 10X Cancer Risk👇 👇Ionizing Radiation Risk From CAC Test👇 👇Cancer Risk From CT Scan Radiation👇 Video: Dr David Alfrey

CAC Coronary Artery Calcium Scan: New Heart Disease Test Causes Cancer. Major Organizations Warn Public Against It... 42 Of Every 100K Patients Develop Cancer From Ionizing Radiation. Radiation Dosage Varies 10X From One Hospital To Another, Causing 5,600 New Cases Of Cancer. The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology & the United States Preventive Services Task Force do not recommend the use of heart CT scans for patients with a low or high risk of heart disease because CT scans could be more harmful than beneficial due to the relatively high dose of radiation. "Tens of millions of adults would be exposed to relatively high levels of radiation through this procedure. Doctors still have not established a standard dose of radiation to be used for heart CT scans & doses for this test vary from one hospital to another, with some patients getting 10X the amount of radiation as patients in another hospital." A 2009 study showed that one heart CT scan for the 50 million Americans who would receive the average radiation dose, these scans would result in 5,600 new cancer cases. The number of new cancer cases would be even higher if individuals were screened more than once in their lifetime. Radiation from CT scans is even of concern to the FDA even when the CT scans are necessary. On October 9, 2009, the FDA announced that it was notifying healthcare professionals that 206 patients who were being tested for stroke received CT radiation doses that were 8X the expected level at one particular medical facility. While this event involved a single kind of diagnostic test at one facility, the FDA warned that “it reflects more widespread problems with CT quality assurance programs.” Each year, over 600,000 Americans die from heart disease even though heart disease can be prevented. Although heart CT scanning may be a useful tool in detecting blockages in heart arteries, there is not enough evidence to show that this test is worth the risks, especially compared to traditional risk factor assessment. For this reason, the Cancer Prevention & Treatment Fund of the National Research Center for Women & Families agrees with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that heart CT scans are not recommended for screening for heart disease. 👇CAC Screening Radiation 10X Cancer Risk👇 👇Ionizing Radiation Risk From CAC Test👇 👇Cancer Risk From CT Scan Radiation👇 Video: Dr David Alfrey

Valerie Anne Smith

117,092 views • 1 year ago

Electromagnetic radiation and 6G are being pushed as the next big leap — but not everyone sees a real need. “In fact, it scares me to death.” Scott McCollough is sounding the alarm as the White House pushes U.S. 6G, with federal actions aimed at expanding the spectrum and accelerating next-generation wireless development. His point is simple: we do not need these technologies just for basic communication. As the push for 6G grows, so do the questions: Who benefits? What are the risks? What is it REALLY about. And why is faster, more invasive wireless being treated like a necessity?

Electromagnetic radiation and 6G are being pushed as the next big leap — but not everyone sees a real need. “In fact, it scares me to death.” Scott McCollough is sounding the alarm as the White House pushes U.S. 6G, with federal actions aimed at expanding the spectrum and accelerating next-generation wireless development. His point is simple: we do not need these technologies just for basic communication. As the push for 6G grows, so do the questions: Who benefits? What are the risks? What is it REALLY about. And why is faster, more invasive wireless being treated like a necessity?

Stop5G Community Empowerment Consulting

19,405 views • 5 months ago