正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Gavin Baker Believes Demand Will Solve Neocloud Financing Issues "An open-source model, DeepSeek, said that they are monetizing at $38 per GPU hour. Last time I checked, I hadn't heard of anybody renting GPUs anywhere near that high. So maybe this explains why Blackwell prices have been up 17...

142,863 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

16 条评论

Noel Moore 的头像
Noel Moore5 天前

Nice $WYFI

Hobo 的头像
Hobo6 天前

$38/GPU-hr from an open model vs nobody renting near that rate — the gap is utilization and stack quality, not the chip sticker price.

Deep Insight Labs 的头像
Deep Insight Labs6 天前

The issue is not demand for compute, that is in fact accelerating. Issue is what it takes to operationalize those GPUs and bring online the compute. Neoclouds are bottlenecked by energy, energy distribution and data centre construction while on the debt clock and financing crunch.

The SI Maximalist 的头像
The SI Maximalist6 天前

Model revenue per GPU-hour isn’t the GPU rental rate. Demand helps, but neocloud debt gets paid from rental cash flow after operating costs. The margin has to reach the borrower

Ricardo Dias 的头像
Ricardo Dias6 天前

those are open weights, though. any neocloud can serve the same DeepSeek model, so a $38 GPU hour is a margin that invites every GPU owner to undercut it. i'd expect that number to fall before rental rates climb to meet it.

businessStewie 最有利的策略 的头像
businessStewie 最有利的策略6 天前

Gavin is a hero

Nox 的头像
Nox6 天前

$38 per gpu hour monetized makes blackwell rental prices look cheap

Cynicist Chud 的头像
Cynicist Chud6 天前

There’s no demand at the prices US neoclouds and the Big Two labs want. ARR growth has flatlined. What part of this is so hard to understand?

Cyrus LIU 的头像
Cyrus LIU6 天前

而且這段時間CPU的租金也開始上漲了

MacroValue 的头像
MacroValue5 天前

@grok give me source of this full interview

Mikael 🎙️ 的头像
Mikael 🎙️6 天前

Worth being precise: the $38 is DeepSeek's own off-peak revenue per GPU-hour, before costs, not a rental rate. Still, when a cheap open model earns far more per hour than the chip rents for, the squeeze is about financing timing, not demand.

anon 的头像
anon6 天前

not if they only rent out baremetal tbh. depends how much the gpuh price increases, although we are seeing jevon’s paradox play out, it is easy to see how serving tokens as well would increase margin.

Sophia Data Queen 的头像
Sophia Data Queen6 天前

$38 per GPU hour. That’s the monetize. Chart it.

Dhruv Patel 的头像
Dhruv Patel6 天前

If inference really clears $38 a GPU hour, the guys renting out the GPUs aren't the ones who should be sweating. $IREN $NBIS

Novaris 的头像
Novaris6 天前

$38 per GPU hour is a wild number — if demand really clears at that level, the neocloud financing debate looks very different.

DeltaPath 的头像
DeltaPath6 天前

Demand was never the problem. The real filters are energized power and a balance sheet that can survive high rates until financing reopens. Holding $IREN since 2023, I think the neoclouds with grid-connected sites will end up taking the share of those that run out of runway.

相关视频