正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Gemini 3 Pro (left) vs ChatGPT 5.1 thinking vs Claude Opus 4.5 (right) Prompt: Multi-ball heptagon physics Write html, css, and javascript to display 20 balls bouncing inside a spinning heptagon. each ball should have a unique color, a number label, gravity, and collision detection with the walls. all... show more

God of Prompt

259,389 subscribers

105,823 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a realistic cloth simulation using HTML5 Canvas and JavaScript. The cloth should be a grid of points connected by constraints using Verlet integration. Implement gravity and mouse interaction: the user should be able to click and drag particles to tear the cloth. The physics must remain stable without exploding.

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a realistic cloth simulation using HTML5 Canvas and JavaScript. The cloth should be a grid of points connected by constraints using Verlet integration. Implement gravity and mouse interaction: the user should be able to click and drag particles to tear the cloth. The physics must remain stable without exploding.

God of Prompt

96,685 次观看 • 8 个月前

1. Realistic Physics Game (Hexagon Test) Prompt: Create a HTML, CSS, and javascript where a ball is inside a rotating hexagon. The ball is affected by Earth’s gravity and friction from the hexagon walls. The bouncing must appear realistic. → Tests physics simulation, code planning, and visual realism.

1. Realistic Physics Game (Hexagon Test) Prompt: Create a HTML, CSS, and javascript where a ball is inside a rotating hexagon. The ball is affected by Earth’s gravity and friction from the hexagon walls. The bouncing must appear realistic. → Tests physics simulation, code planning, and visual realism.

Alex Prompter

888,311 次观看 • 1 年前

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a fully functional 3D Rubik's Cube simulation using Three.js (via CDN). The cube must be able to automatically solve itself.

ChatGPT 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 (left) (middle) (right) prompt I used: Create a single HTML file containing a fully functional 3D Rubik's Cube simulation using Three.js (via CDN). The cube must be able to automatically solve itself.

Alex Prompter

14,891 次观看 • 8 个月前

I just did this in Lambda Chat’s DeepSeek R1 and it got it perfect the first time. I’m not sure your conclusion is accurate. Which hosted DeepSeek are you runnning? Hosted Replit: Prompt: Write an html JavaScript app that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically. Be terse in your thinking and answer quickly

I just did this in Lambda Chat’s DeepSeek R1 and it got it perfect the first time. I’m not sure your conclusion is accurate. Which hosted DeepSeek are you runnning? Hosted Replit: Prompt: Write an html JavaScript app that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically. Be terse in your thinking and answer quickly

stephen balaban

80,651 次观看 • 1 年前

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 pro (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. my dear opus...what have you done...

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 pro (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. my dear opus...what have you done...

Dev Ed

145,939 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 GPT-4.5 is impressive! 🚨 This is the most realistic result so far. "write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically"

🚨 GPT-4.5 is impressive! 🚨 This is the most realistic result so far. "write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically"

Flavio Adamo

851,646 次观看 • 1 年前

We decided to take Paul Jankura’s Claude Opus 4.5 out for a test drive vs. the current #1 ranking model in Code Arena: Gemini 3 Pro. Same prompt, different outputs. Let’s take a look. Remember, your votes drive the leaderboards. We’ll see how Claude Opus 4.5 stacks up in the coming days! Check out some of the comparisons, like how Claude Opus 4.5 handled the “Pyramids of Giza” prompt, in thread. 🧵

We decided to take Paul Jankura’s Claude Opus 4.5 out for a test drive vs. the current #1 ranking model in Code Arena: Gemini 3 Pro. Same prompt, different outputs. Let’s take a look. Remember, your votes drive the leaderboards. We’ll see how Claude Opus 4.5 stacks up in the coming days! Check out some of the comparisons, like how Claude Opus 4.5 handled the “Pyramids of Giza” prompt, in thread. 🧵

Arena.ai

88,977 次观看 • 8 个月前

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Opus 4.6 opus is consistent and relaible Prompt : Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Three.js in one html code block, with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations and you can do 2 things of your choice to make it better

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Opus 4.6 opus is consistent and relaible Prompt : Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Three.js in one html code block, with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations and you can do 2 things of your choice to make it better

Chetaslua

37,519 次观看 • 5 个月前

Gemini (left) vs ChatGPT vs Claude (right) Prompt: Create an interactive HTML, CSS, and JavaScript simulation of a satellite system that transmits signals to ground receivers. The simulation should show a satellite orbiting the Earth and periodically sending signals that are received by multiple ground stations. Include realistic factors such as signal delay based on distance, occasional signal loss due to obstructions or interference, and visualization of the signal path as lines or waves. The satellites’ position should be updated using simplified orbital mechanics, and the ground receivers should display received signal strength and timestamps.

Gemini (left) vs ChatGPT vs Claude (right) Prompt: Create an interactive HTML, CSS, and JavaScript simulation of a satellite system that transmits signals to ground receivers. The simulation should show a satellite orbiting the Earth and periodically sending signals that are received by multiple ground stations. Include realistic factors such as signal delay based on distance, occasional signal loss due to obstructions or interference, and visualization of the signal path as lines or waves. The satellites’ position should be updated using simplified orbital mechanics, and the ground receivers should display received signal strength and timestamps.

Alex Prompter

229,964 次观看 • 8 个月前

Claude Sonnet 3.7 Coding Test Prompt: Create a single HTML file containing CSS and JavaScript to generate an animated weather card. The card should visually represent the following weather conditions with distinct animations: Wind: (e.g., moving clouds, swaying trees, or wind lines) Rain: (e.g., falling raindrops, puddles forming) Sun: (e.g., shining rays, bright background) Snow: (e.g., falling snowflakes, snow accumulating) Show all the weather card side by side The card should have a dark background. Provide all the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code within this single file. The JavaScript should include a way to switch between the different weather conditions (e.g., a function or a set of buttons) to demonstrate the animations for each.

Claude Sonnet 3.7 Coding Test Prompt: Create a single HTML file containing CSS and JavaScript to generate an animated weather card. The card should visually represent the following weather conditions with distinct animations: Wind: (e.g., moving clouds, swaying trees, or wind lines) Rain: (e.g., falling raindrops, puddles forming) Sun: (e.g., shining rays, bright background) Snow: (e.g., falling snowflakes, snow accumulating) Show all the weather card side by side The card should have a dark background. Provide all the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code within this single file. The JavaScript should include a way to switch between the different weather conditions (e.g., a function or a set of buttons) to demonstrate the animations for each.

Delusionals

866,327 次观看 • 1 年前

对比测试了下 OpenAI 今天刚发布的 o3-mini 生成经典的“六边形内旋转球”代码，DeepSeek R1 用时 140 秒，o3-mini-high 用时 25 秒！代码都能正常运行，o3 在物理表现好一点点，看来这个 Code 任务有点简单😄 大家可以自己测试 - Prompt："write a javascript code that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically, implement it in javascript and html"

对比测试了下 OpenAI 今天刚发布的 o3-mini 生成经典的“六边形内旋转球”代码，DeepSeek R1 用时 140 秒，o3-mini-high 用时 25 秒！代码都能正常运行，o3 在物理表现好一点点，看来这个 Code 任务有点简单😄 大家可以自己测试 - Prompt："write a javascript code that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically, implement it in javascript and html"

indigo

288,072 次观看 • 1 年前

Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek vs Grok PROMPT: Build a production-ready 3D flight visualizer in one HTML file. Use Three.js to render a rotatable Earth and simulate real-time aircraft positions using smooth interpolation. Include polished lighting, a starfield background, and make it responsive for mobile and desktop. Which tool is the best?

Claude vs Gemini vs DeepSeek vs Grok PROMPT: Build a production-ready 3D flight visualizer in one HTML file. Use Three.js to render a rotatable Earth and simulate real-time aircraft positions using smooth interpolation. Include polished lighting, a starfield background, and make it responsive for mobile and desktop. Which tool is the best?

Oleg Bilozor

72,608 次观看 • 4 个月前

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Exp: “Write a p5.js script that simulates 25 particles in a vacuum space of a cylindrical container, bouncing within its boundaries. Use different colors for each ball and ensure they leave a trail showing their movement. Add a slow rotation of the container to give better view of what's going on in the scene. Make sure to create proper collision detection and physic rules to ensure particles remain in the container. Add an external spherical container. Add a slow zoom in and zoom out effect to the whole scene.” AK

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Exp: “Write a p5.js script that simulates 25 particles in a vacuum space of a cylindrical container, bouncing within its boundaries. Use different colors for each ball and ensure they leave a trail showing their movement. Add a slow rotation of the container to give better view of what's going on in the scene. Make sure to create proper collision detection and physic rules to ensure particles remain in the container. Add an external spherical container. Add a slow zoom in and zoom out effect to the whole scene.” AK

Philipp Schmid

13,644 次观看 • 1 年前

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Dev Ed

660,154 次观看 • 5 个月前

🐐 Gemini 3 Pro GA One shot prompt is in comment with the codepen link I repeat no model in this entire world able to implement this level of physics and spatial reasoning Not even Opus 4.6 and Gpt-5.3 codex , this is like a generation gap Sub Woofer submitted this

🐐 Gemini 3 Pro GA One shot prompt is in comment with the codepen link I repeat no model in this entire world able to implement this level of physics and spatial reasoning Not even Opus 4.6 and Gpt-5.3 codex , this is like a generation gap Sub Woofer submitted this

Chetaslua

35,579 次观看 • 6 个月前

GLM 5.1 just went open-weight on Hugging Face, but how does it compare to GLM 5? I have tested both with the canvas tree challenge. 5.1 thinks longer, but delivers wind animation, sun, clouds, and way more detail. Prompt attached: Write a single HTML file with a full-page canvas, no libraries. Animate a tree that grows from the bottom center of the screen in real time. The trunk grows upward first, then branches split off recursively with slight randomness in angle and length. Each generation of branches should be thinner and slightly lighter in color. When branches reach their final size, add small leaves as soft green circles at the tips. The tree should take about 15 seconds to fully grow. Use warm brown for wood and varied greens for leaves against a soft sky-blue gradient background.

GLM 5.1 just went open-weight on Hugging Face, but how does it compare to GLM 5? I have tested both with the canvas tree challenge. 5.1 thinks longer, but delivers wind animation, sun, clouds, and way more detail. Prompt attached: Write a single HTML file with a full-page canvas, no libraries. Animate a tree that grows from the bottom center of the screen in real time. The trunk grows upward first, then branches split off recursively with slight randomness in angle and length. Each generation of branches should be thinner and slightly lighter in color. When branches reach their final size, add small leaves as soft green circles at the tips. The tree should take about 15 seconds to fully grow. Use warm brown for wood and varied greens for leaves against a soft sky-blue gradient background.

stevibe

46,657 次观看 • 4 个月前

Claude Code + ChatGPT Images 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯 I rebuilt my static ad system inside Claude Code on the new ChatGPT Images 2.0 model. One brand name + one URL = 40 production-ready static ads. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need high-volume ad creative without briefing a designer or spending hours in Canva. If you're finding winning ad concepts on Meta and manually recreating them one at a time — copying prompts, pasting product details, tweaking aspect ratios, downloading, organizing... This system eliminates the entire loop: → Give Claude a brand name and URL → It researches the brand's fonts, colors, packaging, and photography style → Builds a Brand DNA document from scratch → Fills in 40 proven ad templates (headline, us vs them, testimonial, UGC, review cards, stat callouts) with brand-specific details → Fires every prompt to ChatGPT Images 2.0 with your product photos as reference → Downloads finished ads into organized folders with an HTML gallery No manual prompt filling. No Canva templates. No copy-pasting between tools. What you get: → 40 ad formats filled with your exact brand colors, fonts, and copy → Text that actually renders correctly (the new model handles dense copy, logos, and multi-language callouts cleanly) → Product photos passed as reference so the model matches your real packaging → A reusable system — new brand, new folder, same pipeline Built 100% in Claude Code with ChatGPT Images 2.0. I put together a DIY playbook showing the exact architecture so you can build this yourself in Claude Code. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "CHAT" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

189,324 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Code + ChatGPT Images 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯 I rebuilt my static ad system inside Claude Code on the new ChatGPT Images 2.0 model. One brand name + one URL = 40 production-ready static ads. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need high-volume ad creative without briefing a designer or spending hours in Canva. If you're finding winning ad concepts on Meta and manually recreating them one at a time — copying prompts, pasting product details, tweaking aspect ratios, downloading, organizing... This system eliminates the entire loop: → Give Claude a brand name and URL → It researches the brand's fonts, colors, packaging, and photography style → Builds a Brand DNA document from scratch → Fills in 40 proven ad templates (headline, us vs them, testimonial, UGC, review cards, stat callouts) with brand-specific details → Fires every prompt to ChatGPT Images 2.0 with your product photos as reference → Downloads finished ads into organized folders with an HTML gallery No manual prompt filling. No Canva templates. No copy-pasting between tools. What you get: → 40 ad formats filled with your exact brand colors, fonts, and copy → Text that actually renders correctly (the new model handles dense copy, logos, and multi-language callouts cleanly) → Product photos passed as reference so the model matches your real packaging → A reusable system — new brand, new folder, same pipeline Built 100% in Claude Code with ChatGPT Images 2.0. I put together a DIY playbook showing the exact architecture so you can build this yourself in Claude Code. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "CHAT" And I'll send it over (must be following @learnwithella so I can DM)

Ismail Khan

19,800 次观看 • 3 个月前

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

728,218 次观看 • 1 个月前