正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Gemini 3.6 Flash is now on DeepSWE at 49%, roughly on par with Opus 4.8 at medium reasoning.

Datacurve

10,213 subscribers

244,918 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

GMI Cloud

75,785 次观看 • 2 个月前

Kimi-K3 VS Opus-4.8 GTA IV test. Left : Kimi, Right : Opus-4.8 Kimi-K3 got impressively better than its previous model. + Muse Spark 1.1 generated something that can’t be played at all. + Gemini 3.5 Flash called itself from Anthropic and the game can’t be played too.

Kimi-K3 VS Opus-4.8 GTA IV test. Left : Kimi, Right : Opus-4.8 Kimi-K3 got impressively better than its previous model. + Muse Spark 1.1 generated something that can’t be played at all. + Gemini 3.5 Flash called itself from Anthropic and the game can’t be played too.

Jun Song

26,308 次观看 • 13 天前

Gemini 3 Flash is here. ⚡⚡⚡ Pro-grade reasoning with Flash-level speed and efficiency. It’s rolling out today globally as the default model on Gemini App and Search AI Mode. Learn more:

Gemini 3 Flash is here. ⚡⚡⚡ Pro-grade reasoning with Flash-level speed and efficiency. It’s rolling out today globally as the default model on Gemini App and Search AI Mode. Learn more:

koray kavukcuoglu

76,342 次观看 • 7 个月前

Supercomputer excels at motion design. Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Both videos were generated with Seedance 2.0. The era of agents crafting prompts for you is here.

Supercomputer excels at motion design. Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Both videos were generated with Seedance 2.0. The era of agents crafting prompts for you is here.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

49,389 次观看 • 2 个月前

Gemini 3.1 is SOTA at 3D spatial reasoning

Gemini 3.1 is SOTA at 3D spatial reasoning

Zach Dive

196,253 次观看 • 5 个月前

Grok 4.1 Thinking ranks #2 on Text Arena, outperforms the latest Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2 high, Gemini 3 flash

Grok 4.1 Thinking ranks #2 on Text Arena, outperforms the latest Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2 high, Gemini 3 flash

X Freeze

694,157 次观看 • 7 个月前

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

Dan Shipper 📧

354,033 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Fable 5 excels at scriptwriting. We just paired it with the Higgsfield MCP and the results are stunning. Here is a comparison with Opus 4.8:

Claude Fable 5 excels at scriptwriting. We just paired it with the Higgsfield MCP and the results are stunning. Here is a comparison with Opus 4.8:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

116,444 次观看 • 1 个月前

Get ready for emotion at full speed with THE FLASH - own it on Digital now.

Get ready for emotion at full speed with THE FLASH - own it on Digital now.

The Flash

40,907 次观看 • 3 年前

Who said TPUs can't be fast! This is roughly Groq speeds out of TPU 8i, but with Gemini Flash model so far more intelligent

Who said TPUs can't be fast! This is roughly Groq speeds out of TPU 8i, but with Gemini Flash model so far more intelligent

Max Weinbach

786,093 次观看 • 2 个月前

Hands on with prototype Gemini glasses at I/O

Hands on with prototype Gemini glasses at I/O

David ImeI

54,332 次观看 • 1 年前

opus 4.8 actually cooked at this design, designers actually cooked? it redesigned my landing page with this super clean UI live below 👇

opus 4.8 actually cooked at this design, designers actually cooked? it redesigned my landing page with this super clean UI live below 👇

Dhruval

19,885 次观看 • 2 个月前

We also tested Sonnet 5 against Opus 4.8 on agentic prompting, specifically on dynamic scenes through Seedance 2.0 via Higgsfield MCP. Here is the result:

We also tested Sonnet 5 against Opus 4.8 on agentic prompting, specifically on dynamic scenes through Seedance 2.0 via Higgsfield MCP. Here is the result:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

124,867 次观看 • 28 天前

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?

Lumina

71,994 次观看 • 7 天前

✍️tldraw is using Gemini 3 Flash to power its natural language computer, tldraw computer. Networks of components on an infinite canvas each use Gemini to process data and generate content that flows into other components. These flows are faster, smarter, and more reliable with Gemini 3 Flash.

✍️tldraw is using Gemini 3 Flash to power its natural language computer, tldraw computer. Networks of components on an infinite canvas each use Gemini to process data and generate content that flows into other components. These flows are faster, smarter, and more reliable with Gemini 3 Flash.

Google AI Developers

12,450 次观看 • 7 个月前

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.

Applied Compute

26,609 次观看 • 1 个月前

Google 1. Gemini Live (Now free on Android & iOS) → Turn on your camera → Point at anything → Talk to Gemini about it in real time It now integrates with Maps, Calendar, Tasks, Keep so planning, shopping, or fixing things just got way smarter.

Google 1. Gemini Live (Now free on Android & iOS) → Turn on your camera → Point at anything → Talk to Gemini about it in real time It now integrates with Maps, Calendar, Tasks, Keep so planning, shopping, or fixing things just got way smarter.

Shruti

302,952 次观看 • 1 年前

MiniMax just dropped M2.5 and it's on par with Opus 4.6 while being 20x cheaper and 3x faster???

MiniMax just dropped M2.5 and it's on par with Opus 4.6 while being 20x cheaper and 3x faster???

shydev

442,571 次观看 • 5 个月前

We’re excited to add support for Opus 4.6. With adaptive thinking, Opus 4.6 will decide the right amount of reasoning for your query, reducing latency and improving quality. Internally, we've already resolved bugs that Opus 4.5 couldn't tackle. Try it out on the latest!

We’re excited to add support for Opus 4.6. With adaptive thinking, Opus 4.6 will decide the right amount of reasoning for your query, reducing latency and improving quality. Internally, we've already resolved bugs that Opus 4.5 couldn't tackle. Try it out on the latest!

Warp

12,404 次观看 • 5 个月前