正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

General Yahya Rahim Safavi: "Launching a nuclear strike against Iran would be the most illogical decision." 🚫 Iran's territory spans approximately 1.6 million square kilometers — much of it desert. A tactical nuclear strike would cause severe casualties and tragic damage, but it would not destroy Iran. The country's... show more

IRGC

48,169 subscribers

73,196 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Zhirinovsky (from the future) on the consequences of a nuclear strike on Iran: Israel could launch a nuclear strike on Iran, which would lead to a sharp escalation. Iran will retaliate. It will bomb Saudi Arabia and Qatar and close the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices will jump to 400 dollars per barrel. The economies of the EU and China will collapse. These are the consequences.

Zhirinovsky (from the future) on the consequences of a nuclear strike on Iran: Israel could launch a nuclear strike on Iran, which would lead to a sharp escalation. Iran will retaliate. It will bomb Saudi Arabia and Qatar and close the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices will jump to 400 dollars per barrel. The economies of the EU and China will collapse. These are the consequences.

Sprinter Press

12,907 次观看 • 4 个月前

A U.S. war with Iran would not be about Iran's nuclear program but rather the interests of Israel. In this clip, Pres. Georg Bush made clear that a war with Iran would be for Israel. It was only after the Israel lobby asked Bush to keep that a secret that politicians began emphasizing the nuclear program.

A U.S. war with Iran would not be about Iran's nuclear program but rather the interests of Israel. In this clip, Pres. Georg Bush made clear that a war with Iran would be for Israel. It was only after the Israel lobby asked Bush to keep that a secret that politicians began emphasizing the nuclear program.

Propaganda & co

157,986 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨🇮🇱 🇮🇷THE NUCLEAR THRESHOLD: ISRAEL’S UNILATERAL CAPABILITY Col. Larry Wilkerson argues that Israel is now powerful and willing enough to make nuclear decisions without seeking U.S. permission. A single tactical strike would not be enough; because of Iran's vast size, Israel would likely employ multiple weapons to force an end to the conflict. The stigma of nuclear use is fading as regional escalations push the parties toward unfathomable outcomes.

🚨🇮🇱 🇮🇷THE NUCLEAR THRESHOLD: ISRAEL’S UNILATERAL CAPABILITY Col. Larry Wilkerson argues that Israel is now powerful and willing enough to make nuclear decisions without seeking U.S. permission. A single tactical strike would not be enough; because of Iran's vast size, Israel would likely employ multiple weapons to force an end to the conflict. The stigma of nuclear use is fading as regional escalations push the parties toward unfathomable outcomes.

Mario Nawfal

61,313 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷NUCLEAR FALLOUT: THE ISRAELI RISK Stanislav Krapivnik warns that an Israeli nuclear strike would cause a regional meltdown. With 60% enriched uranium, Iran is only weeks away from its own arsenal. The risk of a small nuclear warhead being used as a deterrent is now a reality. 🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷NUCLEAR FALLOUT: THE ISRAELI RISK Stanislav Krapivnik warns that an Israeli nuclear strike would cause a regional meltdown. With 60% enriched uranium, Iran is only weeks away from its own arsenal. The risk of a small nuclear warhead being used as a deterrent is now a reality. 🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺

Mario Nawfal

118,452 次观看 • 4 个月前

BREAKING 🚨 🇮🇷 ☢️ Iran’s parliament is considering withdrawing from the Nuclear Non‑Proliferation Treaty. 🌍 If Iran leaves, it would no longer face international restrictions. 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 This could allow Iran to expand its nuclear program, raising concerns in the US and Israel.

BREAKING 🚨 🇮🇷 ☢️ Iran’s parliament is considering withdrawing from the Nuclear Non‑Proliferation Treaty. 🌍 If Iran leaves, it would no longer face international restrictions. 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 This could allow Iran to expand its nuclear program, raising concerns in the US and Israel.

FalconUpdatesHQ

746,678 次观看 • 4 个月前

NEW: Senator Mark Kelly suggests he would support the United States attacking Iran to take out its underground nuclear facilities, but says he'd rather see a deal made through negotiations. Cooper: Would you support if the US decided to strike Iran directly, even if US forces have not been attacked? Kelly: "I would like to see Iran's nuclear capability to be completely disarmed. It is a tough problem." "You would have to hit those facilities, the underground facilities, with GBU 57s..." "The Israelis, not only do they not have the weapon, they don't have the ability to deliver it..."

NEW: Senator Mark Kelly suggests he would support the United States attacking Iran to take out its underground nuclear facilities, but says he'd rather see a deal made through negotiations. Cooper: Would you support if the US decided to strike Iran directly, even if US forces have not been attacked? Kelly: "I would like to see Iran's nuclear capability to be completely disarmed. It is a tough problem." "You would have to hit those facilities, the underground facilities, with GBU 57s..." "The Israelis, not only do they not have the weapon, they don't have the ability to deliver it..."

Collin Rugg

378,400 次观看 • 1 年前

🇮🇱 Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz says Iran still hasn't restarted its nuclear program since Israel struck it. "Since we struck the nuclear program, they have not resumed it. They have not resumed it. That's a fact. To restart it, they would first have to make a decision, and they haven't made that decision." If the program hasn't restarted, it's worth asking why Israel is already preparing to strike Iran again. Writer: Julie

🇮🇱 Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz says Iran still hasn't restarted its nuclear program since Israel struck it. "Since we struck the nuclear program, they have not resumed it. They have not resumed it. That's a fact. To restart it, they would first have to make a decision, and they haven't made that decision." If the program hasn't restarted, it's worth asking why Israel is already preparing to strike Iran again. Writer: Julie

Mario Nawfal

38,644 次观看 • 1 个月前

The sheer arrogance of the United States in forbidding other sovereign countries from having nuclear weapons is truly stunning. If Iran already had nuclear weapons, the United States and Israel would never have attacked it, and there would be no war. Having nuclear weapons is the only real deterrent to keep countries like Israel and the United States off your back.

The sheer arrogance of the United States in forbidding other sovereign countries from having nuclear weapons is truly stunning. If Iran already had nuclear weapons, the United States and Israel would never have attacked it, and there would be no war. Having nuclear weapons is the only real deterrent to keep countries like Israel and the United States off your back.

Richard

68,819 次观看 • 4 个月前

⚡️JUST IN: Israel's Defense Minister states that the United States is not allowing Israel to create a Global Energy Crisis "We want to strike Iran's energy targets but the United States is not Approving it, Iran would attack neighboring countries and trigger a Global Oil Crisis"

⚡️JUST IN: Israel's Defense Minister states that the United States is not allowing Israel to create a Global Energy Crisis "We want to strike Iran's energy targets but the United States is not Approving it, Iran would attack neighboring countries and trigger a Global Oil Crisis"

Iran Observer

164,465 次观看 • 20 天前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 SPEAKER JOHNSON: TRUMP STOPPED IRAN FROM GOING NUCLEAR "Iran was very close to nuclear capability. Trump has been crystal clear... Iran can never have nuclear weapons. They would use it against Israel immediately, and they would use it against the US if they could. The president wants peace in the region. He does not want to be a wartime president. But we have to protect our country, our citizens. And that's what this is about." Source: Speaker Mike Johnson, Fox News

🇺🇸🇮🇷 SPEAKER JOHNSON: TRUMP STOPPED IRAN FROM GOING NUCLEAR "Iran was very close to nuclear capability. Trump has been crystal clear... Iran can never have nuclear weapons. They would use it against Israel immediately, and they would use it against the US if they could. The president wants peace in the region. He does not want to be a wartime president. But we have to protect our country, our citizens. And that's what this is about." Source: Speaker Mike Johnson, Fox News

Mario Nawfal

55,441 次观看 • 1 年前

Nick Fuentes floats the possibility of the Israel-Iran conflict culminating in nuclear attack, noting that if the US were to regime change Iran—a militarily developed country of 90 million people—it would require a full-scale invasion or a Hiroshima-style strike. Follow: AF Post

Nick Fuentes floats the possibility of the Israel-Iran conflict culminating in nuclear attack, noting that if the US were to regime change Iran—a militarily developed country of 90 million people—it would require a full-scale invasion or a Hiroshima-style strike. Follow: AF Post

AF Post

434,119 次观看 • 1 年前

$The fact that the hypersonic penetrated the air defense rather easily - If Iran have nuclear weaponry, nuclear warheads on these would mean Israel is wipe off the face of the earth. Iran is so close to this capability now... and thus Israel is going ham on Iran to prevent this possible eventuality. But Iran is a huge country. What if Israel fail. And Iran get to detonate a nuclear bomb in one of the Israeli cities.... then what? Would USA go to war? Would Russia and China continue to back Iran? What can sanctions do? =\$

The fact that the hypersonic penetrated the air defense rather easily - If Iran have nuclear weaponry, nuclear warheads on these would mean Israel is wipe off the face of the earth. Iran is so close to this capability now... and thus Israel is going ham on Iran to prevent this possible eventuality. But Iran is a huge country. What if Israel fail. And Iran get to detonate a nuclear bomb in one of the Israeli cities.... then what? Would USA go to war? Would Russia and China continue to back Iran? What can sanctions do? =\

Defense Politics Asia

1,562,485 次观看 • 1 年前

Videos show missiles over Israel as the Israeli military says Iran launched a new wave of attacks. The escalation follows a deadly Israeli strike on Beirut, with Iran warning it would abandon negotiations and return to ‘direct confrontation’.

Videos show missiles over Israel as the Israeli military says Iran launched a new wave of attacks. The escalation follows a deadly Israeli strike on Beirut, with Iran warning it would abandon negotiations and return to ‘direct confrontation’.

Al Jazeera Breaking News

92,009 次观看 • 2 个月前

Head of the Presidential Office Kyrylo Budanov, in an interview with Maxim Tucker for The Times, on the probability of a nuclear strike from Russia: I have not seen any indicators of preparation for a nuclear strike. Russia has the ability to strike with a nuclear weapon at any given place, at any distance, at any given moment. Its nuclear capabilities allow it to accomplish such a task. But the question of doing that is a matter of a political decision. Had there been any preparations I would be aware of them.

Head of the Presidential Office Kyrylo Budanov, in an interview with Maxim Tucker for The Times, on the probability of a nuclear strike from Russia: I have not seen any indicators of preparation for a nuclear strike. Russia has the ability to strike with a nuclear weapon at any given place, at any distance, at any given moment. Its nuclear capabilities allow it to accomplish such a task. But the question of doing that is a matter of a political decision. Had there been any preparations I would be aware of them.

Anton Gerashchenko

19,880 次观看 • 3 个月前

"It would be devastating for the region, it would be devastating for the whole world." NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte joined Bret Baier on Special Report and threw his support behind President Trump's approach to Iran, warning of the global consequences if Tehran were to obtain a nuclear weapon. "Could you imagine if Iran gets its hands on a nuclear weapon?" Rutte asked. "I am completely behind him on this," he added, praising Trump's efforts to ensure Iran never acquires nuclear capabilities.

"It would be devastating for the region, it would be devastating for the whole world." NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte joined Bret Baier on Special Report and threw his support behind President Trump's approach to Iran, warning of the global consequences if Tehran were to obtain a nuclear weapon. "Could you imagine if Iran gets its hands on a nuclear weapon?" Rutte asked. "I am completely behind him on this," he added, praising Trump's efforts to ensure Iran never acquires nuclear capabilities.

Fox News

173,299 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,156 次观看 • 23 天前