Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨🇮🇱 🇮🇷THE NUCLEAR THRESHOLD: ISRAEL’S UNILATERAL CAPABILITY Col. Larry Wilkerson argues that Israel is now powerful and willing enough to make nuclear decisions without seeking U.S. permission. A single tactical strike would not be enough; because of Iran's vast size, Israel would likely employ multiple weapons to force an... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,217,112 subscribers

61,313 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Здоровье и велнес Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 IRAN WANTS TO INFLICT “ENOUGH PAIN” WITHOUT TRIGGERING NUCLEAR WAR Dimitri Lascaris says Tehran’s calculus is to inflict enough damage to deter future attacks, but not so much that it provokes a nuclear response. He argues Iran believes the U.S. and Israel have not yet crossed their “pain threshold,” making escalation in the coming days likely. Lascaris warns the risk of a nuclear strike is real, saying dismissing that possibility is “naive” and likely something Iranian leaders are weighing seriously. Dimitri Lascaris

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 IRAN WANTS TO INFLICT “ENOUGH PAIN” WITHOUT TRIGGERING NUCLEAR WAR Dimitri Lascaris says Tehran’s calculus is to inflict enough damage to deter future attacks, but not so much that it provokes a nuclear response. He argues Iran believes the U.S. and Israel have not yet crossed their “pain threshold,” making escalation in the coming days likely. Lascaris warns the risk of a nuclear strike is real, saying dismissing that possibility is “naive” and likely something Iranian leaders are weighing seriously. Dimitri Lascaris

Mario Nawfal

32,516 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇮🇱 Netanyahu: “Nuclear weapons in the hands of Iran would mean the end of Israel.” 🇮🇷 Iran: “You have already devastated Gaza, Palestine and Lebanon, and now you are looking to destroy Iran. So we need nuclear weapons to stop your madness.” Iran’s message is clear: nuclear capability is being framed as a deterrent against further aggression.

🇮🇱 Netanyahu: “Nuclear weapons in the hands of Iran would mean the end of Israel.” 🇮🇷 Iran: “You have already devastated Gaza, Palestine and Lebanon, and now you are looking to destroy Iran. So we need nuclear weapons to stop your madness.” Iran’s message is clear: nuclear capability is being framed as a deterrent against further aggression.

Ebrahim Zolfaghari

137,593 просмотров • 3 дней назад

General Yahya Rahim Safavi: "Launching a nuclear strike against Iran would be the most illogical decision." 🚫 Iran's territory spans approximately 1.6 million square kilometers — much of it desert. A tactical nuclear strike would cause severe casualties and tragic damage, but it would not destroy Iran. The country's vast size would allow it to survive. 🚫 In response, however, Iran would strike directly at Dimona and other Israeli nuclear sites. For a country as small as Israel, this would lead to a far more devastating collapse. The choice lies with the United States. 🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸☢️🔥💥⚡️

General Yahya Rahim Safavi: "Launching a nuclear strike against Iran would be the most illogical decision." 🚫 Iran's territory spans approximately 1.6 million square kilometers — much of it desert. A tactical nuclear strike would cause severe casualties and tragic damage, but it would not destroy Iran. The country's vast size would allow it to survive. 🚫 In response, however, Iran would strike directly at Dimona and other Israeli nuclear sites. For a country as small as Israel, this would lead to a far more devastating collapse. The choice lies with the United States. 🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸☢️🔥💥⚡️

IRGC

73,196 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 A nuclear-free Middle East was on the table in the 90s and Israel was the obstacle then. The same conversation may be coming back. Former U.S. Colonel Larry Wilkerson says the framework discussed under Bush Sr., Baker, and Powell envisioned a regional non-proliferation zone that would force Israel to either surrender its nuclear weapons or formally place them under treaty. The biggest obstacle then is still the biggest obstacle now: monarchies that still execute dissidents trying to align with a regional democracy. Wilkerson's harder truth is that the U.S. no longer produces leaders capable of brokering this. It produces party loyalists instead.

🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 A nuclear-free Middle East was on the table in the 90s and Israel was the obstacle then. The same conversation may be coming back. Former U.S. Colonel Larry Wilkerson says the framework discussed under Bush Sr., Baker, and Powell envisioned a regional non-proliferation zone that would force Israel to either surrender its nuclear weapons or formally place them under treaty. The biggest obstacle then is still the biggest obstacle now: monarchies that still execute dissidents trying to align with a regional democracy. Wilkerson's harder truth is that the U.S. no longer produces leaders capable of brokering this. It produces party loyalists instead.

Mario Nawfal

13,175 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸🔥 Iran may reach 90% uranium enrichment within the next two weeks — and could test nuclear weapons if the U.S. or Israel strikes Tehran again. 🚨 The U.S. has reportedly halted strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, fearing that further attacks could push the IRGC to achieve nuclear capability. The balance of deterrence is shifting. ☢️⚡️🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱💥🔥

🇮🇷🇺🇸🔥 Iran may reach 90% uranium enrichment within the next two weeks — and could test nuclear weapons if the U.S. or Israel strikes Tehran again. 🚨 The U.S. has reportedly halted strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, fearing that further attacks could push the IRGC to achieve nuclear capability. The balance of deterrence is shifting. ☢️⚡️🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱💥🔥

IRAN GLOBAL

72,717 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨Could the US or Israel actually use a tactical nuclear weapon against Iran? 🚨 I believe they could. Not to annihilate Tehran or murder millions of civilians, but against Iran’s underground nuclear or military facilities if conventional weapons fail. And if that nuclear threshold is crossed, the consequences would be catastrophic. Iran would seek the bomb. Turkey would want one. Saudi Arabia would want one. The entire Middle East could enter a nuclear arms race. Watch my argument 👇

🚨Could the US or Israel actually use a tactical nuclear weapon against Iran? 🚨 I believe they could. Not to annihilate Tehran or murder millions of civilians, but against Iran’s underground nuclear or military facilities if conventional weapons fail. And if that nuclear threshold is crossed, the consequences would be catastrophic. Iran would seek the bomb. Turkey would want one. Saudi Arabia would want one. The entire Middle East could enter a nuclear arms race. Watch my argument 👇

Kevork Almassian

18,516 просмотров • 13 дней назад

🚨 BREAKING: Trump just said israel would never use nuclear weapons against Iran. Wait what? This is the closest a US President has come to openly acknowledging israel’s nuclear arsenal.

🚨 BREAKING: Trump just said israel would never use nuclear weapons against Iran. Wait what? This is the closest a US President has come to openly acknowledging israel’s nuclear arsenal.

Jvnior

510,735 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Noam Chomsky explains why the US🇺🇸 government, Israel, and the media never acknowledge Israel’s nukes: If the US were to recognise Israel as a state with nuclear weapons, US aid to Israel would be ILLEGAL since they were developed outside of international legal frameworks. The absurd assumption behind the US’ negotiating position is that Iran would somehow just willingly give up its nuclear program and missile program… Meaning it would have no deterrent against an Israel that is armed with nuclear weapons, that launched two wars against it in a single year. While the US demands Iran has no deterrent, according to Washington, Israel is allowed to keep its nuclear Sword of Damocles hanging over Iran and the entire region.

Noam Chomsky explains why the US🇺🇸 government, Israel, and the media never acknowledge Israel’s nukes: If the US were to recognise Israel as a state with nuclear weapons, US aid to Israel would be ILLEGAL since they were developed outside of international legal frameworks. The absurd assumption behind the US’ negotiating position is that Iran would somehow just willingly give up its nuclear program and missile program… Meaning it would have no deterrent against an Israel that is armed with nuclear weapons, that launched two wars against it in a single year. While the US demands Iran has no deterrent, according to Washington, Israel is allowed to keep its nuclear Sword of Damocles hanging over Iran and the entire region.

Afshin Rattansi

18,421 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Prof. John Mearsheimer: The United States and Israel have failed on every one of their objectives — regime change, eliminating enrichment capability, ballistic missiles, support for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Every one. Israel is in real trouble because it has been unable to shut down Iran's nuclear program, which is the issue it cares about the most. There is a serious possibility that Iran will get nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States cannot get a nuclear deal, there is a serious possibility Israel will use its nuclear weapons to attack Iran.

Prof. John Mearsheimer: The United States and Israel have failed on every one of their objectives — regime change, eliminating enrichment capability, ballistic missiles, support for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Every one. Israel is in real trouble because it has been unable to shut down Iran's nuclear program, which is the issue it cares about the most. There is a serious possibility that Iran will get nuclear weapons. If Israel and the United States cannot get a nuclear deal, there is a serious possibility Israel will use its nuclear weapons to attack Iran.

Clash Report

17,081 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,233 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 BREAKING: ISRAEL LAUNCHES ‘STRENGTH OF A LION’ AIRSTRIKES ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR SITES The IDF confirms it has begun an extensive aerial campaign targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and military assets. Codenamed “Strength of a Lion,” the strikes come amid intelligence warnings that Iran holds enough enriched uranium to produce multiple nuclear weapons within days. Sirens heard across Israel were issued as a preemptive alert in anticipation of Iranian retaliation. The Israeli Air Force is currently striking dozens of high-priority sites across Iran. Source: Times of Israel Media: Unconfirmed

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 BREAKING: ISRAEL LAUNCHES ‘STRENGTH OF A LION’ AIRSTRIKES ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR SITES The IDF confirms it has begun an extensive aerial campaign targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and military assets. Codenamed “Strength of a Lion,” the strikes come amid intelligence warnings that Iran holds enough enriched uranium to produce multiple nuclear weapons within days. Sirens heard across Israel were issued as a preemptive alert in anticipation of Iranian retaliation. The Israeli Air Force is currently striking dozens of high-priority sites across Iran. Source: Times of Israel Media: Unconfirmed

Mario Nawfal

420,268 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 Breaking: Israel Air Force released footage of attack on Arak nuclear reactor earlier today 👇 The reactor was intended for producing plutonium for nuclear weapons. It's now gone, and the world is a safer place, thanks to Israel 🇮🇱

🚨 Breaking: Israel Air Force released footage of attack on Arak nuclear reactor earlier today 👇 The reactor was intended for producing plutonium for nuclear weapons. It's now gone, and the world is a safer place, thanks to Israel 🇮🇱

Dr. Eli David

482,248 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING: “Netanyahu may use NUCLEAR WEAPONS — and the U.S. can't stop him” - Col Douglas Macgregor “If a nuclear weapon is used, it will be by Netanyahu and his government. The more desperate they become, if Iran does not submit—and I see no evidence they would submit—the more likely that option could be embraced and employed.”

🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING: “Netanyahu may use NUCLEAR WEAPONS — and the U.S. can't stop him” - Col Douglas Macgregor “If a nuclear weapon is used, it will be by Netanyahu and his government. The more desperate they become, if Iran does not submit—and I see no evidence they would submit—the more likely that option could be embraced and employed.”

Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸

465,312 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷THE NEW ORDER: NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION Stanislav Krapivnik claims the destruction of the world order is leading to a global arms race. Regional powers now see nuclear weapons as the only way to keep the U.S. off their backs. The genie is out of the bottle, and the market for nuclear weapons is expanding rapidly. 🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷THE NEW ORDER: NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION Stanislav Krapivnik claims the destruction of the world order is leading to a global arms race. Regional powers now see nuclear weapons as the only way to keep the U.S. off their backs. The genie is out of the bottle, and the market for nuclear weapons is expanding rapidly. 🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺

Mario Nawfal

35,736 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

☢️NUCLEAR WAR ALERT: "The Biggest Risk Is That The President Is Seriously Considering The Use Of Nuclear Weapons In Iran!" Pakistan, Turkey, & Saudi Arabia's "Islamic NATO" Nuclear Defense Pact That Syria Is Seeking To Enter Could Be Exercised Against Israel Or The US! "They May Exercise That Defense Pact If Israel Attacks Turkey & Syria, Or If The US Uses Nuclear Weapons!" 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

☢️NUCLEAR WAR ALERT: "The Biggest Risk Is That The President Is Seriously Considering The Use Of Nuclear Weapons In Iran!" Pakistan, Turkey, & Saudi Arabia's "Islamic NATO" Nuclear Defense Pact That Syria Is Seeking To Enter Could Be Exercised Against Israel Or The US! "They May Exercise That Defense Pact If Israel Attacks Turkey & Syria, Or If The US Uses Nuclear Weapons!" 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

Alex Jones

175,504 просмотров • 11 дней назад

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.

Kyle Becker

385,090 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 IRAN ALREADY HAS UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR CAPABILITY? Col. Larry Wilkerson warns that Iran likely already possesses the ability to mate a nuclear warhead to a missile underground. He says the U.S. no longer has the global support or capability to stop it. The “Empire” is boxed in, NATO and the EU are weakened, and the current administration’s approach has only accelerated the problem. Wilkerson believes America’s survival may depend on a complete change in leadership.

🇮🇷🇺🇸 IRAN ALREADY HAS UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR CAPABILITY? Col. Larry Wilkerson warns that Iran likely already possesses the ability to mate a nuclear warhead to a missile underground. He says the U.S. no longer has the global support or capability to stop it. The “Empire” is boxed in, NATO and the EU are weakened, and the current administration’s approach has only accelerated the problem. Wilkerson believes America’s survival may depend on a complete change in leadership.

Mario Nawfal

111,270 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A U.S. war with Iran would not be about Iran's nuclear program but rather the interests of Israel. In this clip, Pres. Georg Bush made clear that a war with Iran would be for Israel. It was only after the Israel lobby asked Bush to keep that a secret that politicians began emphasizing the nuclear program.

A U.S. war with Iran would not be about Iran's nuclear program but rather the interests of Israel. In this clip, Pres. Georg Bush made clear that a war with Iran would be for Israel. It was only after the Israel lobby asked Bush to keep that a secret that politicians began emphasizing the nuclear program.

Propaganda & co

158,330 просмотров • 1 год назад