Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Genesee County uses Flock automated license plate reader cameras, but it refused to release key records about the system—including camera locations, audit logs and vehicle-scan records. The county claims Flock, a private contractor, owns the information. But the county’s own contract says Genesee County owns the data. Kettering University...

20,967 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Mackinac Center profil fotoğrafı
Mackinac Center1 ay önce

Learn more:

Scot profil fotoğrafı
Scot1 ay önce

flock cameras should only be able to read license plates when the owner needs to be contacted about an infraction, these "wanted" numbers can be programmed in

Insanemustangs profil fotoğrafı
Insanemustangs1 ay önce

Pay attention @CheyennePolice …one day you’ll be sued for hiding what you are doing with the actual information you really see. If you had nothing to hide you would openly show the citizens you surveil.

Angela Cesar profil fotoğrafı
Angela Cesar1 ay önce

Way to go Josh!

Susan Rockwell profil fotoğrafı
Susan Rockwell1 ay önce

Private venders don't have the right to track us either

Beeg Yoshi profil fotoğrafı
Beeg Yoshi1 ay önce

Why are black people in Genesee county

Jake Williams profil fotoğrafı
Jake Williams1 ay önce

@johnbryanesq

TheGreatRecall profil fotoğrafı
TheGreatRecall1 ay önce

Flock's own words: "customers own and control the data." The customer is the government. That makes it a warrantless government seizure of your location data — and a Fourth Amendment violation hiding behind a private contractor's logo. Carpenter v. United States already answered this.

🇺🇸TONY🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
🇺🇸TONY🇺🇸1 ay önce

He should.

Gone fishing profil fotoğrafı
Gone fishing1 ay önce

@OrwellDay

Benzer Videolar

Please see this video and press release regarding Flock cameras in Knox County. Video transcript: Hello, this is Knox County Mayor Glenn Jacobs. Today, I am urging our Commission to prohibit the use of Flock cameras and similar devices in our County. For those of you who don't know, these cameras, technically called Automated License Plate Readers, are motion activated and take a picture of every car which passes by. While License Plate Readers have been around for a while, because of AI and vastly increased networking and data retention capacities, these Flock cameras have capabilities not even imagined in the past. Older cameras only took a photo of your license plate, which was then retained for a short time. Flock cameras take a photo of your place, but also use AI to catalogue distinguishing features of your vehicle: make, color, model, even bumper stickers. That data is stored in a searchable database for sometimes up to a month or more, depending on the policies of that particular agency. When these cameras are deployed in large numbers, they create a network that can be used to track your movements. Currently, there is no federal regulatory framework governing these devices in place, and the Tennessee laws regulating them were written over a decade ago. My fear is that may be inadvertantly creating a warrantless mass surveillance system and undermining the privacy and Liberty of our people. So I urge the Tennessee General Assembly and the United States Congress to look at this issue and take neccessary action to safeguard our privacy and civil liberties as these new technologies continue to emerge. Thank you.

Glenn Jacobs

232,642 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

Wall Street Apes

105,323 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce