正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨WOW!!!!!! A Texas constable has unplugged every single Flock camera in his county. "I don’t believe “safety” should be a word that automatically ends the discussion whenever individual liberty is involved." "Flock, come get your GARBAGE out of my county..." County commissioners in Hood County voted unanimously in April... to end its contract with Flock, which included three cameras, and the constable finished the job of shutting down the Flock cameras by unplugging them and covering them with a hood. The constable further wrote: "When government has the ability to collect, search and share information about the movements of people who aren’t suspected of committing a crime, I believe that raises serious Fourth Amendment and privacy concerns. The answer can’t simply be, “Trust us. We won’t misuse it.”show more

Matt Van Swol

564,458 subscribers

84,552 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Americans even in rural towns are saying they are under surveillance by Flock Cameras “I pass 8 Flock cameras on the way to my kids' school — 2 stoplights, but 8 Flock cameras. I live in a rural county. I'm passing more surveillance cameras than I am businesses. That's insane” “So yeah, surveillance state coming to a rural county near you” This is the surveillance state being established Many people think there are just a few flock cameras being put up in counties, but that’s not the case. The amount of cameras would shock you Harris County Sheriff’s Office has access to 480 Flock cameras The greater Houston area has nearly 3,800 Flock cameras installed across the region This is mass surveillance

Americans even in rural towns are saying they are under surveillance by Flock Cameras “I pass 8 Flock cameras on the way to my kids' school — 2 stoplights, but 8 Flock cameras. I live in a rural county. I'm passing more surveillance cameras than I am businesses. That's insane” “So yeah, surveillance state coming to a rural county near you” This is the surveillance state being established Many people think there are just a few flock cameras being put up in counties, but that’s not the case. The amount of cameras would shock you Harris County Sheriff’s Office has access to 480 Flock cameras The greater Houston area has nearly 3,800 Flock cameras installed across the region This is mass surveillance

Wall Street Apes

133,188 次观看 • 2 个月前

ALERT: Vigilantes go on a rampage, destroying FLOCK cameras in a quiet Northern California county. Marcus Bee, 40, was one of the alleged suspects and was seen destroying 3 of the Flock cameras and even ramming one with his truck in Monterey County. The Monterey County Sheriff’s Office arrested Bee on suspicion of felony vandalism and set his bail at $30,000. Seaside police have stated that 2 cameras were also destroyed and believe it is a targeted incident. “There’s more than just vandalism alone. I’m sure people have seen on the internet that this is kind of a trend, so we’re looking at possible conspiracy to commit a crime beyond the vandalism, and also those Flock cameras are computer systems, so it’s denying access to a computer system, which is a felony in California.”

ALERT: Vigilantes go on a rampage, destroying FLOCK cameras in a quiet Northern California county. Marcus Bee, 40, was one of the alleged suspects and was seen destroying 3 of the Flock cameras and even ramming one with his truck in Monterey County. The Monterey County Sheriff’s Office arrested Bee on suspicion of felony vandalism and set his bail at $30,000. Seaside police have stated that 2 cameras were also destroyed and believe it is a targeted incident. “There’s more than just vandalism alone. I’m sure people have seen on the internet that this is kind of a trend, so we’re looking at possible conspiracy to commit a crime beyond the vandalism, and also those Flock cameras are computer systems, so it’s denying access to a computer system, which is a felony in California.”

E X X ➠A L E R T S

60,458 次观看 • 1 个月前

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

Orwell Day

25,952 次观看 • 19 天前

Tucker Carlson says that Flock Safety Cameras aren’t about safety, they’re about mass surveillance “The promise is that if you give up your privacy, your right to kind of walk around without having your face analyzed and sent to headquarters somewhere in this or another country, you would in exchange get what? Safety. The problem is it hasn't worked that way. Harris County, Texas has over 3,000 license plate readers. You would think it would be the safest place in the United States, but weirdly, Harris County, Texas had over 500 murders in 2025. How is it that we increase the surveillance past what 1984 describes, and we still have 500 murders in one U.S. county” The data backs this up Advocacy groups such as the Texas Civil Rights Project have identified that there are nearly 3,800 Flock cameras in the surrounding greater Houston area The Harris County Sheriff’s Office has reported access to around 480 of these cameras Yet the murder rate is extremely high Harris County recorded about 503 homicides in 2024 We need to get rid of Flock cameras while we still can, this is about mass surveillance

Tucker Carlson says that Flock Safety Cameras aren’t about safety, they’re about mass surveillance “The promise is that if you give up your privacy, your right to kind of walk around without having your face analyzed and sent to headquarters somewhere in this or another country, you would in exchange get what? Safety. The problem is it hasn't worked that way. Harris County, Texas has over 3,000 license plate readers. You would think it would be the safest place in the United States, but weirdly, Harris County, Texas had over 500 murders in 2025. How is it that we increase the surveillance past what 1984 describes, and we still have 500 murders in one U.S. county” The data backs this up Advocacy groups such as the Texas Civil Rights Project have identified that there are nearly 3,800 Flock cameras in the surrounding greater Houston area The Harris County Sheriff’s Office has reported access to around 480 of these cameras Yet the murder rate is extremely high Harris County recorded about 503 homicides in 2024 We need to get rid of Flock cameras while we still can, this is about mass surveillance

Wall Street Apes

31,028 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨Genesee County uses Flock cameras to capture and search vehicle data. But when Kettering University student Josh Tewolde requested records showing where the cameras are, who accessed the data and whether his vehicle was scanned, the county withheld key information. Its excuse? The records belong to Flock, a private contractor. But the county’s own contract says it owns the data. Josh is suing because government should not be able to hide public surveillance records behind a private company. If the government uses the cameras, the public deserves transparency.

🚨Genesee County uses Flock cameras to capture and search vehicle data. But when Kettering University student Josh Tewolde requested records showing where the cameras are, who accessed the data and whether his vehicle was scanned, the county withheld key information. Its excuse? The records belong to Flock, a private contractor. But the county’s own contract says it owns the data. Josh is suing because government should not be able to hide public surveillance records behind a private company. If the government uses the cameras, the public deserves transparency.

Mackinac Center

2,195,326 次观看 • 9 天前

Genesee County uses Flock automated license plate reader cameras, but it refused to release key records about the system—including camera locations, audit logs and vehicle-scan records. The county claims Flock, a private contractor, owns the information. But the county’s own contract says Genesee County owns the data. Kettering University student Josh Tewolde is suing to enforce Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act. The case raises a straightforward question: Can government avoid transparency laws by routing public surveillance through a private vendor?

Genesee County uses Flock automated license plate reader cameras, but it refused to release key records about the system—including camera locations, audit logs and vehicle-scan records. The county claims Flock, a private contractor, owns the information. But the county’s own contract says Genesee County owns the data. Kettering University student Josh Tewolde is suing to enforce Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act. The case raises a straightforward question: Can government avoid transparency laws by routing public surveillance through a private vendor?

Mackinac Center

20,929 次观看 • 9 天前

Florida’s surveillance problem keeps getting harder to explain. Oviedo: fake Flock cameras were installed without the mayor knowing. Pasco: a commissioner admitted she hadn’t read the license-plate-reader contract, then defended it against concerns about warrantless mass surveillance. Manatee County: the sheriff said there’s “a lot of misinformation” surrounding Flock cameras. Interestingly, Flock CEO Garrett Langley has also used the misinformation line in an NBC interview. Okaloosa County: Langley emailed the sheriff’s department claiming activists were trying to “weaponize” public-records requests. Yet politicians and Flock’s CEO still can’t figure out why people don’t trust license plate readers.

Florida’s surveillance problem keeps getting harder to explain. Oviedo: fake Flock cameras were installed without the mayor knowing. Pasco: a commissioner admitted she hadn’t read the license-plate-reader contract, then defended it against concerns about warrantless mass surveillance. Manatee County: the sheriff said there’s “a lot of misinformation” surrounding Flock cameras. Interestingly, Flock CEO Garrett Langley has also used the misinformation line in an NBC interview. Okaloosa County: Langley emailed the sheriff’s department claiming activists were trying to “weaponize” public-records requests. Yet politicians and Flock’s CEO still can’t figure out why people don’t trust license plate readers.

Matt The Welder

21,056 次观看 • 5 天前

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”

The DeVory Darkins Show

20,786 次观看 • 13 天前

Have you been to Home Depot recently? This Denver location has Flock cameras at each of the entrances to the parking lot! I can only imagine that Home Depot has a contract with Flock to collect and sell the data of every car that comes into their parking lot....

Have you been to Home Depot recently? This Denver location has Flock cameras at each of the entrances to the parking lot! I can only imagine that Home Depot has a contract with Flock to collect and sell the data of every car that comes into their parking lot....

FreeStateColorado

14,805 次观看 • 24 天前

San Jose, California residents file a lawsuit against the city for their deployment of Flock license plate reading cameras The people behind this lawsuit say the city has violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting surveillance without a warrant “Drivers have filed a class action suit against San Jose and its police department over the deployment of nearly 500 cameras, including by Flock safety” In California Flock camera data has been shared with the federal government as well as nonprofits (which is insane) Activists also say they are being used to track illegals in San Jose. So I guess this is one benefit

San Jose, California residents file a lawsuit against the city for their deployment of Flock license plate reading cameras The people behind this lawsuit say the city has violated the Fourth Amendment by conducting surveillance without a warrant “Drivers have filed a class action suit against San Jose and its police department over the deployment of nearly 500 cameras, including by Flock safety” In California Flock camera data has been shared with the federal government as well as nonprofits (which is insane) Activists also say they are being used to track illegals in San Jose. So I guess this is one benefit

Wall Street Apes

51,919 次观看 • 4 个月前

Please see this video and press release regarding Flock cameras in Knox County. Video transcript: Hello, this is Knox County Mayor Glenn Jacobs. Today, I am urging our Commission to prohibit the use of Flock cameras and similar devices in our County. For those of you who don't know, these cameras, technically called Automated License Plate Readers, are motion activated and take a picture of every car which passes by. While License Plate Readers have been around for a while, because of AI and vastly increased networking and data retention capacities, these Flock cameras have capabilities not even imagined in the past. Older cameras only took a photo of your license plate, which was then retained for a short time. Flock cameras take a photo of your place, but also use AI to catalogue distinguishing features of your vehicle: make, color, model, even bumper stickers. That data is stored in a searchable database for sometimes up to a month or more, depending on the policies of that particular agency. When these cameras are deployed in large numbers, they create a network that can be used to track your movements. Currently, there is no federal regulatory framework governing these devices in place, and the Tennessee laws regulating them were written over a decade ago. My fear is that may be inadvertantly creating a warrantless mass surveillance system and undermining the privacy and Liberty of our people. So I urge the Tennessee General Assembly and the United States Congress to look at this issue and take neccessary action to safeguard our privacy and civil liberties as these new technologies continue to emerge. Thank you.

Please see this video and press release regarding Flock cameras in Knox County. Video transcript: Hello, this is Knox County Mayor Glenn Jacobs. Today, I am urging our Commission to prohibit the use of Flock cameras and similar devices in our County. For those of you who don't know, these cameras, technically called Automated License Plate Readers, are motion activated and take a picture of every car which passes by. While License Plate Readers have been around for a while, because of AI and vastly increased networking and data retention capacities, these Flock cameras have capabilities not even imagined in the past. Older cameras only took a photo of your license plate, which was then retained for a short time. Flock cameras take a photo of your place, but also use AI to catalogue distinguishing features of your vehicle: make, color, model, even bumper stickers. That data is stored in a searchable database for sometimes up to a month or more, depending on the policies of that particular agency. When these cameras are deployed in large numbers, they create a network that can be used to track your movements. Currently, there is no federal regulatory framework governing these devices in place, and the Tennessee laws regulating them were written over a decade ago. My fear is that may be inadvertantly creating a warrantless mass surveillance system and undermining the privacy and Liberty of our people. So I urge the Tennessee General Assembly and the United States Congress to look at this issue and take neccessary action to safeguard our privacy and civil liberties as these new technologies continue to emerge. Thank you.

Glenn Jacobs

231,451 次观看 • 1 个月前

Flock cameras aren’t keeping you safe—they’re chaining you like a dog to the Zionist-occupied surveillance state. They’re a cancer that needs to be destroyed along with every local elected sellout that’s profiting from them in your county.

Flock cameras aren’t keeping you safe—they’re chaining you like a dog to the Zionist-occupied surveillance state. They’re a cancer that needs to be destroyed along with every local elected sellout that’s profiting from them in your county.

Stew Peters

74,332 次观看 • 1 个月前

WOAH 🚨 Democrat Costa Mesa, California Mayor John Stephens says he has never seen an issue where “virtually 100% of the people gave the same position on it” for wanting Flock cameras cancelled Right after saying this, he voted to keep the Flock camera contract INSANE “I don't think that I've ever in 10 years had an item that's come before us where virtually 100% of the people gave the same position on it, and including people that are on email. — Yeah, I'm concerned about the people that came up and said sincerely that the flock is impacting their trust in the police department” Right after this he voted to keep the Flock cameras These people do not work for the American people This is how far gone our Government is

WOAH 🚨 Democrat Costa Mesa, California Mayor John Stephens says he has never seen an issue where “virtually 100% of the people gave the same position on it” for wanting Flock cameras cancelled Right after saying this, he voted to keep the Flock camera contract INSANE “I don't think that I've ever in 10 years had an item that's come before us where virtually 100% of the people gave the same position on it, and including people that are on email. — Yeah, I'm concerned about the people that came up and said sincerely that the flock is impacting their trust in the police department” Right after this he voted to keep the Flock cameras These people do not work for the American people This is how far gone our Government is

Wall Street Apes

286,251 次观看 • 1 个月前

American surveilled the Flock CEO and found he takes different routes and changes out his vehicles daily, likely to make it harder to track him Rules for thee, but not for me “After surveilling the CEO of Flock for 3 days, my private investigator found 3 separate cars, three separate routes, and 3 different plates. If the man who made his fortune recording your license plate changes his own every day to preserve his privacy, then what does that tell you about the value of privacy itself?” “The reality is, the evidence that Flock prevents crime is nonexistent. Cities that have been covered in Flock cameras saw the same crime reduction as cities with none, because crime fell nationwide everywhere at the same time. Flock simply stood in front of a falling curve it didn't cause and called it proof” The data being referenced is from Council on Criminal Justice and it shows crime days through 2025 - Nationwide crime days showed a 36% decline since 2021 - Houston Texas which is heavily saturated with flock only saw a 36% reduction in crime during this same time period Meaning the crime rate fell at the same rate whether there were flock cameras or not Keep in mind there are 3,800 flock cameras in the Houston area so you would logically expect the decline in crime to be much greater, but homicides only fell at the national average

American surveilled the Flock CEO and found he takes different routes and changes out his vehicles daily, likely to make it harder to track him Rules for thee, but not for me “After surveilling the CEO of Flock for 3 days, my private investigator found 3 separate cars, three separate routes, and 3 different plates. If the man who made his fortune recording your license plate changes his own every day to preserve his privacy, then what does that tell you about the value of privacy itself?” “The reality is, the evidence that Flock prevents crime is nonexistent. Cities that have been covered in Flock cameras saw the same crime reduction as cities with none, because crime fell nationwide everywhere at the same time. Flock simply stood in front of a falling curve it didn't cause and called it proof” The data being referenced is from Council on Criminal Justice and it shows crime days through 2025 - Nationwide crime days showed a 36% decline since 2021 - Houston Texas which is heavily saturated with flock only saw a 36% reduction in crime during this same time period Meaning the crime rate fell at the same rate whether there were flock cameras or not Keep in mind there are 3,800 flock cameras in the Houston area so you would logically expect the decline in crime to be much greater, but homicides only fell at the national average

Wall Street Apes

219,092 次观看 • 18 天前

Norfolk, Virginia has been quietly installing hundreds of Flock cameras enabling mass, warrantless surveillance that tracks innocent people’s movements A federal judge has sided with Americans and ordered locations public “A federal judge in Norfolk has made the locations of more than 600 flock safety surveillance cameras across Hampton Roads public. The first time such a list has ever been released. Local cities and counties had previously denied requests for this information, citing Virginia's open records law and critical infrastructure protections. But now a federal lawsuit claims the city's use of these cameras violates Fourth Amendment rights, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. The complaint filed The Flock system, filed in 2024, seeks to stop Norfolk's use of the Flock system and erase the data already collected.” Flock Cameras offer - Privacy Erosion and Mass Surveillance - Indiscriminate Data Collection - National Data Sharing - Unauthorized Access by Federal Agencies - Easy Exploitation for hacking, many using just a USB stick with no mandatory multi-factor authentication and credentials - Lack of Transparency and Oversight

Norfolk, Virginia has been quietly installing hundreds of Flock cameras enabling mass, warrantless surveillance that tracks innocent people’s movements A federal judge has sided with Americans and ordered locations public “A federal judge in Norfolk has made the locations of more than 600 flock safety surveillance cameras across Hampton Roads public. The first time such a list has ever been released. Local cities and counties had previously denied requests for this information, citing Virginia's open records law and critical infrastructure protections. But now a federal lawsuit claims the city's use of these cameras violates Fourth Amendment rights, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. The complaint filed The Flock system, filed in 2024, seeks to stop Norfolk's use of the Flock system and erase the data already collected.” Flock Cameras offer - Privacy Erosion and Mass Surveillance - Indiscriminate Data Collection - National Data Sharing - Unauthorized Access by Federal Agencies - Easy Exploitation for hacking, many using just a USB stick with no mandatory multi-factor authentication and credentials - Lack of Transparency and Oversight

Wall Street Apes

160,550 次观看 • 9 个月前

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

Wall Street Apes

104,246 次观看 • 5 天前

🚨#BREAKING: A former Air Force engineer in Virginia has been arrested after he allegedly damaged / destroyed over a dozen Flock cameras. When asked why, he said the Flock cams were, "unconstitutional and a violation of my and others’ Fourth Amendment rights." He allegedly tossed them off major highways where they shattered. Police caught the former engineer by using the very Flock cams he was destroying to track him down.

🚨#BREAKING: A former Air Force engineer in Virginia has been arrested after he allegedly damaged / destroyed over a dozen Flock cameras. When asked why, he said the Flock cams were, "unconstitutional and a violation of my and others’ Fourth Amendment rights." He allegedly tossed them off major highways where they shattered. Police caught the former engineer by using the very Flock cams he was destroying to track him down.

Paul White Gold Eagle

12,825 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨#BREAKING: A former Air Force engineer in Virginia has been arrested after he allegedly damaged / destroyed over a dozen Flock cameras. When asked why, he said the Flock cams were, "unconstitutional and a violation of my and others’ Fourth Amendment rights." He allegedly tossed them off major highways where they shattered. Police caught the former engineer by using the very Flock cams he was destroying to track him down.

🚨#BREAKING: A former Air Force engineer in Virginia has been arrested after he allegedly damaged / destroyed over a dozen Flock cameras. When asked why, he said the Flock cams were, "unconstitutional and a violation of my and others’ Fourth Amendment rights." He allegedly tossed them off major highways where they shattered. Police caught the former engineer by using the very Flock cams he was destroying to track him down.

Matt Van Swol

1,885,175 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 THE CEO OF FLOCK JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT Remember when Flock cameras were only supposed to read license plates? Apparently that's not enough anymore. Now we're talking about AI that can find a vehicle from a simple description. Microphones that are always listening for so called "sounds of distress." Drones that can be launched automatically after a 911 call. And camera networks that can follow movement across entire cities. Every year the cameras get smarter. The databases get bigger. The AI gets more powerful. And the amount of information being collected keeps growing. Then came the comment that really got people's attention. The CEO behind Flock, one of the largest camera networks in America reportedly compared people who map camera locations to terrorists. Think about that for a second. The cameras aren't the problem. The people tracking the cameras are. Some people see a tool that makes communities safer. Others see a system that knows where you've been, where you are, and eventually where you're likely to go next. If mapping Flock cameras makes you a "terrorist," what does that make the people putting cameras everywhere?

🚨 THE CEO OF FLOCK JUST SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD — AND PEOPLE ARE LOSING IT Remember when Flock cameras were only supposed to read license plates? Apparently that's not enough anymore. Now we're talking about AI that can find a vehicle from a simple description. Microphones that are always listening for so called "sounds of distress." Drones that can be launched automatically after a 911 call. And camera networks that can follow movement across entire cities. Every year the cameras get smarter. The databases get bigger. The AI gets more powerful. And the amount of information being collected keeps growing. Then came the comment that really got people's attention. The CEO behind Flock, one of the largest camera networks in America reportedly compared people who map camera locations to terrorists. Think about that for a second. The cameras aren't the problem. The people tracking the cameras are. Some people see a tool that makes communities safer. Others see a system that knows where you've been, where you are, and eventually where you're likely to go next. If mapping Flock cameras makes you a "terrorist," what does that make the people putting cameras everywhere?

HustleBitch

317,837 次观看 • 2 个月前

Reporter: Did anyone try to get a warning to the people in the camps outside of automated systems? Kidd: We talked to the county emergency manager, the county does have a plan for that county in the 18 or so camps in that county, it would probably be really good to ask them that question and let them give that answer.

Reporter: Did anyone try to get a warning to the people in the camps outside of automated systems? Kidd: We talked to the county emergency manager, the county does have a plan for that county in the 18 or so camps in that county, it would probably be really good to ask them that question and let them give that answer.

Acyn

591,743 次观看 • 1 年前