Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Geoffrey Hinton says AGI is a silly term because intelligence is not one-dimensional AI will be jagged compared to humans: far better than us at some tasks, still weaker at others Superintelligence is a clearer idea It means AI becomes better than humans at almost every intellectual task we... show more

Haider.

66,109 subscribers

27,282 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Scott Wu says Karpathy's idea of jagged intelligence explains why humans and AI work best together. AI is superhuman at some tasks, shockingly weak at others. “As long as that tail exists of what humans can do, that's what we'll own.” We still decide what to build. In the end, software engineering is just telling the computer what to do.

Scott Wu says Karpathy's idea of jagged intelligence explains why humans and AI work best together. AI is superhuman at some tasks, shockingly weak at others. “As long as that tail exists of what humans can do, that's what we'll own.” We still decide what to build. In the end, software engineering is just telling the computer what to do.

vitrupo

38,496 views • 1 year ago

Geoffrey Hinton warns: AI might be smarter than we think, and it knows when it's being tested. If it senses it's under scrutiny, it can 'act dumb' to hide its full capabilities. AI is already proficient at persuading and could soon surpass humans.

Geoffrey Hinton warns: AI might be smarter than we think, and it knows when it's being tested. If it senses it's under scrutiny, it can 'act dumb' to hide its full capabilities. AI is already proficient at persuading and could soon surpass humans.

Chubby♨️

20,482 views • 6 months ago

Nick Bostrom says achieving general intelligence in AI will lead to "full unemployment" as it becomes difficult to find tasks at which humans would still be helpful

Nick Bostrom says achieving general intelligence in AI will lead to "full unemployment" as it becomes difficult to find tasks at which humans would still be helpful

Tsarathustra

126,629 views • 1 year ago

Sam Altman says "AGI soon" is too vague for what is really coming A clearer way to say it: AI may soon do more of the world's total thinking than humans That could cause major short-term job disruption if most intellectual work shifts to GPUs "so we need to start designing an economy that works for everyone"

Sam Altman says "AGI soon" is too vague for what is really coming A clearer way to say it: AI may soon do more of the world's total thinking than humans That could cause major short-term job disruption if most intellectual work shifts to GPUs "so we need to start designing an economy that works for everyone"

Haider.

31,953 views • 5 months ago

AI is not independent of humans. It is built on humans. ChatGPT writes good essays because humans wrote the essays first. Facial recognition works because humans labeled every face manually. Every AI system runs on human labor that is deliberately hidden. And here is the problem: AI is far more expensive than humans. But humans are hard to enslave long term. That is why the system will fail. You cannot build a god on the backs of people who eventually stop obeying.

AI is not independent of humans. It is built on humans. ChatGPT writes good essays because humans wrote the essays first. Facial recognition works because humans labeled every face manually. Every AI system runs on human labor that is deliberately hidden. And here is the problem: AI is far more expensive than humans. But humans are hard to enslave long term. That is why the system will fail. You cannot build a god on the backs of people who eventually stop obeying.

Predictive History

10,906 views • 4 months ago

Why “technology always creates new jobs” will not work this time. - From ex-OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo, and the founder of the AI Futures Project. Previous technological automation replaced particular tasks while leaving humans better at the new ones that emerged. Superintelligence, by definition, breaks that pattern because it is, by definition, better than humans across every task—not merely the old jobs. --- He is the founder of the AI Futures Project, and the lead author of 'AI 2027,’ the famous report mapping the trajectory of AI From "The Diary Of A CEO" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Why “technology always creates new jobs” will not work this time. - From ex-OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo, and the founder of the AI Futures Project. Previous technological automation replaced particular tasks while leaving humans better at the new ones that emerged. Superintelligence, by definition, breaks that pattern because it is, by definition, better than humans across every task—not merely the old jobs. --- He is the founder of the AI Futures Project, and the lead author of 'AI 2027,’ the famous report mapping the trajectory of AI From "The Diary Of A CEO" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

13,732 views • 2 months ago

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

Jon Hernandez

26,061 views • 24 days ago

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than him in the reasonably near future Once that becomes clear, companies and countries will face pressure to give AI more influential roles or fall behind "people will still want humans, but if AI is better, more power will shift to AI"

Haider.

31,627 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk says once AI becomes intelligent enough, they will likely be in charge of humans as we lose all control—drawing a stark parallel to the intelligence gap between humans and chimpanzees “If The difference in intelligence between AI and humans is vastly greater than the difference in intelligence between AI & Chimpanzees, It’s hard to imagine that the chimpanzees will be in charge.” — later saying humans will be like very happy pet Labradors. Are you ready to be a pet Labrador for an AI robot?

Elon Musk says once AI becomes intelligent enough, they will likely be in charge of humans as we lose all control—drawing a stark parallel to the intelligence gap between humans and chimpanzees “If The difference in intelligence between AI and humans is vastly greater than the difference in intelligence between AI & Chimpanzees, It’s hard to imagine that the chimpanzees will be in charge.” — later saying humans will be like very happy pet Labradors. Are you ready to be a pet Labrador for an AI robot?

MJTruthUltra

78,075 views • 1 month ago

🚨 ELON MUSK: "AI will outperform humans at most jobs." “I do think it’s going to be a bumpy road, because AI will be able to do any job better than any person can do that job. That will be true very quickly for jobs that are digital, or really anything that involves a person at a computer or on a phone. AI will be able to do all of that very soon. For software engineering, we already have a situation where AI is better than at least 90% of humans at writing software, including 90% of professional software engineers. It really is getting to the point where it will be better than 99%, and then it will get to the point where there’s just no way to compete. It will get to what I call Stockfish level. Stockfish is a chess program that is so good at chess that it will easily beat Magnus Carlsen, or anyone, even while running on a small computer. I suspect you could probably run Stockfish on your phone and beat Magnus Carlsen. That’s how good it is at chess, and that’s how good AI will be at writing software. And that applies to everything.”

🚨 ELON MUSK: "AI will outperform humans at most jobs." “I do think it’s going to be a bumpy road, because AI will be able to do any job better than any person can do that job. That will be true very quickly for jobs that are digital, or really anything that involves a person at a computer or on a phone. AI will be able to do all of that very soon. For software engineering, we already have a situation where AI is better than at least 90% of humans at writing software, including 90% of professional software engineers. It really is getting to the point where it will be better than 99%, and then it will get to the point where there’s just no way to compete. It will get to what I call Stockfish level. Stockfish is a chess program that is so good at chess that it will easily beat Magnus Carlsen, or anyone, even while running on a small computer. I suspect you could probably run Stockfish on your phone and beat Magnus Carlsen. That’s how good it is at chess, and that’s how good AI will be at writing software. And that applies to everything.”

DogeDesigner

61,112 views • 1 month ago

Geoffrey Hinton says his greatest fear is that humans become irrelevant, replaced by digital beings more intelligent than us want to know how it feels not to be the smartest species? Ask a chicken

Geoffrey Hinton says his greatest fear is that humans become irrelevant, replaced by digital beings more intelligent than us want to know how it feels not to be the smartest species? Ask a chicken

Haider.

142,500 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

DN_DEGEN

71,568 views • 25 days ago

ELON: WILL OUR LIVES STILL HAVE MEANING IF COMPUTERS AND ROBOTS OUTPERFORM US? “At some point, as AI and robotics get better, eventually AI will be able to do everything that humans can do. Any task you do will be optional, like a hobby. It does beg the question, will our lives have meaning if the computers and the robots can do everything better than we can? That is a real question. I do wonder about that myself. That's maybe why we need the Neuralink, so we can enhance human capability, so we can keep up with the machines.” Source: Interview with Mark Penn at CES, January 8, 2025

ELON: WILL OUR LIVES STILL HAVE MEANING IF COMPUTERS AND ROBOTS OUTPERFORM US? “At some point, as AI and robotics get better, eventually AI will be able to do everything that humans can do. Any task you do will be optional, like a hobby. It does beg the question, will our lives have meaning if the computers and the robots can do everything better than we can? That is a real question. I do wonder about that myself. That's maybe why we need the Neuralink, so we can enhance human capability, so we can keep up with the machines.” Source: Interview with Mark Penn at CES, January 8, 2025

Mario Nawfal

329,993 views • 1 year ago

📁 Geoffrey Hinton, deep learning pioneer and Turing Award winner, says AI will not be an obedient assistant. It will be more like a child. Smarter than us. And eventually making its own decisions. The challenge is not controlling it. It is making sure it cares about us.

📁 Geoffrey Hinton, deep learning pioneer and Turing Award winner, says AI will not be an obedient assistant. It will be more like a child. Smarter than us. And eventually making its own decisions. The challenge is not controlling it. It is making sure it cares about us.

Jon Hernandez

97,859 views • 6 months ago

🎥WATCH: Elon Musk compares humans to chimpanzees in the age of AI. Musk says AI will soon be so far ahead of humans that the intelligence gap will be greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees. "Even if there was a stop button, we probably shouldn't press it. The most likely outcome is incredible abundance for all."

🎥WATCH: Elon Musk compares humans to chimpanzees in the age of AI. Musk says AI will soon be so far ahead of humans that the intelligence gap will be greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees. "Even if there was a stop button, we probably shouldn't press it. The most likely outcome is incredible abundance for all."

Coin Bureau

36,187 views • 1 month ago