Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Germany spent years forcing its economy through a subsidized green transition. Now Berlin needs the money back. Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government plans to cut more than €30 billion from Germany's 'Climate and Transformation Fund.' Heat pump support will be restricted while electric vehicle funding will be slashed. The fund...

14,298 views • 11 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Germany has just erased another symbol of its industrial strength. The demolition of the Gundremmingen cooling towers marks not only the end of a nuclear facility but the continued dismantling of Germany’s economic backbone. What began under the red-green coalition two decades ago, and was later accelerated by Angela Merkel’s panic-driven phaseout, is now being completed under Friedrich Merz. The same politicians who once promised “sustainability” are now presiding over energy dependence, deindustrialization, and the collapse of what was once Europe’s most competitive economy. Nuclear power was not Germany’s problem. It was its greatest asset: clean, efficient, and far cheaper than imported gas or unstable renewables. Yet ideological blindness turned success into guilt. The country that once built the best reactors in the world now imports nuclear energy from France and coal-based electricity from Poland. The political class calls this progress while businesses shut down and energy-intensive industries relocate abroad. Under the Merz administration, the absurdity has reached its final stage. While AI data centers, chip fabs, and future manufacturing all demand enormous amounts of reliable power, Germany is blowing up the very plants that could have supplied it. Instead of securing affordable electricity for innovation, Berlin is subsidizing wind turbines that stand still half the year and gas plants that rely on foreign regimes. This is not strategy; it is surrender disguised as virtue. The destruction of Gundremmingen is not about energy policy. It is about the decline of rational governance. Germany’s leaders are sacrificing economic sovereignty for ideology, while pretending it is moral necessity. The result is predictable: higher costs, weaker industry, and growing dependence on those who still value energy realism. What fell today in Bavaria were not cooling towers, but the last remnants of Germany’s common sense.

Torsten Prochnow

75,877 views • 9 months ago

EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Reeves has proposed increasing defence spending by less than £10 billion over the next four years despite stark warnings that Britain’s “national security and safety is in peril” The chancellor has outlined plans with the prime minister for a “limited” increase amid concern about the impact of the Iran war on the public finances The armed forces have warned that they are facing a funding gap of around £28 billion over the next four years on their existing plans However a government source said that Reeves has proposed an increase in funding of less than £10 billion during her discussions with Sir Keir Starmer, fearing a bigger increase would be unaffordable The Iran war has pushed up the cost of government borrowing and households face higher energy bills, petrol costs and prices in shops The chancellor is drawing up plans for a targeted energy bill bailout for low-income households this winter and is also expected to shelve plans to begin increasing fuel duty by 5p a litre from September at a cost of about £2.6 billion. Both measures will add to pressure on the public finances The State of It political podcast from The Times and The Sunday Times has been told that Reeves is unwilling to break her fiscal rules or increase taxes to boost defence spending John Healey, the defence secretary, is pressing for a bigger increase as there are concerns that £10 billion will not be enough, given the increasing likelihood that British forces will be deployed to Ukraine and the Middle East

Steven Swinford

42,545 views • 3 months ago