Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Ginestra Bianconi thinks gravity can be derived from entropy — and that gravity itself is fundamentally anti-reductionistic, since it's about geometry rather than isolated particle interactions. In this episode, the network-topologist-turned-gravity-theorist explains her "Gravity from Entropy" action, which treats matter and geometry symmetrically through a geometric quantum relative entropy...

TOEwithCurt's profile picture

Curt Jaimungal

59,697 subscribers

22,734 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A common misconception in physics is that gravity must be negligible at the quantum scale because its measured strength appears weak compared to electromagnetism and the strong nuclear force. However, this perception arises from considering gravity only in its weak field limit. Obviously, it will appear weak under such conditions, but the situation changes when we consider regions of high mass-energy density. For example, when examining strong gravitational fields near black holes, the force becomes immensely powerful. With this in mind, lets re-examine unification and gravity at the quantum scale: Following our holographic mass solution, elementary particles like protons are found to be microscopic Schwarzschild black holes and their mass-energy density is sufficient to create a gravitational curvature equivalent to the strong nuclear force. The vacuum energy density of space provides enough energy to maintain these structures through Planck-scale dynamics, preventing their rapid evaporation via Hawking radiation, so they are ultra-stable. These discoveries, expounded in our studies like The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity, available to download for free on CERN's Zenodo preprint server-🔗 -demonstrate that what we observe as distinct fundamental forces are in fact manifestations of a unified force operating at different scales, where quantum vacuum fluctuations significantly curve spacetime (the curvature being gravity) with the resulting encapsulation generating screening effects that modulate the apparent strength of gravity from its fundamental high-energy state, which results in nuclear confinement forces, to its familiar weak-field behavior that appears as regular Newtonian gravity.
0:30

A common misconception in physics is that gravity must be negligible at the quantum scale because its measured strength appears weak compared to electromagnetism and the strong nuclear force. However, this perception arises from considering gravity only in its weak field limit. Obviously, it will appear weak under such conditions, but the situation changes when we consider regions of high mass-energy density. For example, when examining strong gravitational fields near black holes, the force becomes immensely powerful. With this in mind, lets re-examine unification and gravity at the quantum scale: Following our holographic mass solution, elementary particles like protons are found to be microscopic Schwarzschild black holes and their mass-energy density is sufficient to create a gravitational curvature equivalent to the strong nuclear force. The vacuum energy density of space provides enough energy to maintain these structures through Planck-scale dynamics, preventing their rapid evaporation via Hawking radiation, so they are ultra-stable. These discoveries, expounded in our studies like The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity, available to download for free on CERN's Zenodo preprint server-🔗 -demonstrate that what we observe as distinct fundamental forces are in fact manifestations of a unified force operating at different scales, where quantum vacuum fluctuations significantly curve spacetime (the curvature being gravity) with the resulting encapsulation generating screening effects that modulate the apparent strength of gravity from its fundamental high-energy state, which results in nuclear confinement forces, to its familiar weak-field behavior that appears as regular Newtonian gravity.

Nassim Haramein

19,882 views • 1 year ago

😎🤌 According to Bob Lazar, UAP operate using a gravity wave-based propulsion system that distorts space-time rather than using conventional thrust 👽🛸 The craft generate power and gravity waves through a reactor fueled by a stable isotope of Element 115. In the reactor, Element 115 is bombarded with protons, briefly becomes Element 116, decays, and releases small amounts of antimatter. This antimatter annihilates with matter to produce enormous energy (near 100% efficient), which powers the craft and also creates a unique Gravity A wave (a micro-scale gravity field Lazar says is an extension of the strong nuclear force). This Gravity A wave forms around the reactor at the top of the craft. A waveguide channels it downward into three gravity amplifiers arranged in a triangle at the base. These amplifiers run at full power at all times and can phase-shift the wave (0° to 180°) to control direction and strength. By focusing and amplifying the gravity wave, the craft creates a powerful, localized gravitational distortion: - It bends/warps space-time in front of the vehicle. - This effectively pulls the destination toward the craft (instead of pushing the craft forward through space). Operation modes: - Omicron mode (hovering/low speed): Amplifiers point downward → craft balances/sits on its own gravity field (explains the characteristic wobble/bobbing seen in many videos). - Delta mode (high speed/travel): Amplifiers point forward → extreme space-time warping for rapid movement. Key effects: - No inertia (occupants feel no acceleration). - Time dilation near the craft. - Optical distortion (gravity lensing can make the craft appear blurry, shimmering, or invisible). In essence, the craft "falls" toward its target by warping space ahead of it, allowing extreme speeds, sharp turns, and interstellar travel without conventional motion or time dilation issues for the occupants. (#UAP #UFO #UFOSighting)
17:37

😎🤌 According to Bob Lazar, UAP operate using a gravity wave-based propulsion system that distorts space-time rather than using conventional thrust 👽🛸 The craft generate power and gravity waves through a reactor fueled by a stable isotope of Element 115. In the reactor, Element 115 is bombarded with protons, briefly becomes Element 116, decays, and releases small amounts of antimatter. This antimatter annihilates with matter to produce enormous energy (near 100% efficient), which powers the craft and also creates a unique Gravity A wave (a micro-scale gravity field Lazar says is an extension of the strong nuclear force). This Gravity A wave forms around the reactor at the top of the craft. A waveguide channels it downward into three gravity amplifiers arranged in a triangle at the base. These amplifiers run at full power at all times and can phase-shift the wave (0° to 180°) to control direction and strength. By focusing and amplifying the gravity wave, the craft creates a powerful, localized gravitational distortion: - It bends/warps space-time in front of the vehicle. - This effectively pulls the destination toward the craft (instead of pushing the craft forward through space). Operation modes: - Omicron mode (hovering/low speed): Amplifiers point downward → craft balances/sits on its own gravity field (explains the characteristic wobble/bobbing seen in many videos). - Delta mode (high speed/travel): Amplifiers point forward → extreme space-time warping for rapid movement. Key effects: - No inertia (occupants feel no acceleration). - Time dilation near the craft. - Optical distortion (gravity lensing can make the craft appear blurry, shimmering, or invisible). In essence, the craft "falls" toward its target by warping space ahead of it, allowing extreme speeds, sharp turns, and interstellar travel without conventional motion or time dilation issues for the occupants. (#UAP #UFO #UFOSighting)

★ UAP Luigi ★ 👁️⃤ 🇺🇸 👽MJ12 SOM1-01

43,212 views • 8 months ago

Sasha Grey revealed why she left the adult industry. She explained that the industry is like a black hole — you have to move faster than the speed of light to get out, otherwise the gravity just pulls you back in. She said it’s not a success story for everybody and a lot of people have tried and failed to leave. She also revealed that what saved her was always having other interests like writing, which gave her options and made her feel like she could actually make something work outside of c0rn. “you can move faster than the speed of light to get out otherwise the gravity just pulls you back in… it’s not a success story for everybody.”
1:04

Sensitive content

Sasha Grey revealed why she left the adult industry. She explained that the industry is like a black hole — you have to move faster than the speed of light to get out, otherwise the gravity just pulls you back in. She said it’s not a success story for everybody and a lot of people have tried and failed to leave. She also revealed that what saved her was always having other interests like writing, which gave her options and made her feel like she could actually make something work outside of c0rn. “you can move faster than the speed of light to get out otherwise the gravity just pulls you back in… it’s not a success story for everybody.”

FÜRY

137,065 views • 1 month ago

Food in space. Never thought I would have to learn to eat again 😅. Here I am explaining why habits matter when you are eating in space. If you are not mindful you can easily create a mess and you don’t want to be that guy. Solid mantra that works for anything in space “Slow is Fast”. Other interesting fact is we don’t need gravity to digest food. A process called ‘peristalsis’ is responsible for digestion which is gravity independent. It is the contraction and relaxation of muscles to push food down through the digestive tract. Head up or head down, gravity or no gravity your body will always digest food. Bon appetit. 😊 #shux #space #iss #shubhanshushukla #india #axiom4 #isro #bharat #food
1:03

Food in space. Never thought I would have to learn to eat again 😅. Here I am explaining why habits matter when you are eating in space. If you are not mindful you can easily create a mess and you don’t want to be that guy. Solid mantra that works for anything in space “Slow is Fast”. Other interesting fact is we don’t need gravity to digest food. A process called ‘peristalsis’ is responsible for digestion which is gravity independent. It is the contraction and relaxation of muscles to push food down through the digestive tract. Head up or head down, gravity or no gravity your body will always digest food. Bon appetit. 😊 #shux #space #iss #shubhanshushukla #india #axiom4 #isro #bharat #food

Shubhanshu Shukla

148,235 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Did you know Bob Lazar blew the whistle on alien tech back in 1989? In his documentary, he details how UFOs achieve interstellar travel by distorting space-time inside an anti-gravity field. Here's the mind-blowing breakdown, straight from his theories: 🚀🛸 - **The Core Propulsion System**: Lazar claims the crafts use "gravity amplifiers" – three devices at the base that focus and amplify gravitational waves. These aren't your typical engines; they create a localized anti-gravity field around the craft, allowing it to defy Earth's gravity effortlessly. - **Distorting Space-Time**: Inside this field, the amplifiers bend space-time itself. Think Einstein's relativity on steroids: by projecting a strong gravitational wave ahead, the craft "pulls" space toward it, shortening vast interstellar distances. It's like folding a map so points A and B touch – no need for light-speed travel; you warp the fabric of reality instead. - **Power Source: Element 115**: The key fuel is stable isotopes of Element 115 (now called Moscovium, synthesized in labs but unstable here). When protons bombard it in a reactor, it produces anti-matter, annihilating with matter to generate massive energy (100% efficient, no waste). More crucially, Element 115's superheavy nucleus emits gravity-A waves (a strong nuclear force extension), which the amplifiers harness to create the distortion field. - **How It Works in Flight**: In "delta mode" (for interstellar jumps), the amplifiers tilt to focus the gravity wave forward, creating a "downhill" slope in space-time that the craft "falls" along at incredible speeds. In "omicron mode" (hover/low-speed), it balances against planetary gravity for silent, agile maneuvers – explaining those impossible UFO zigzags. This isn't sci-fi; Lazar says he reverse-engineered nine such discs at S-4 (near Area 51). Watch the attached video clip from his doc where he explains it firsthand! 🤯 Did Bob Lazar really work where he claimed (S-4/Area 51), and if this tech was possible back in 1989, are we already traveling interstellar today? Drop your thoughts below! #BobLazar #UFO #Area51 #Element115 #InterstellarTravel
4:11

🚨 Did you know Bob Lazar blew the whistle on alien tech back in 1989? In his documentary, he details how UFOs achieve interstellar travel by distorting space-time inside an anti-gravity field. Here's the mind-blowing breakdown, straight from his theories: 🚀🛸 - **The Core Propulsion System**: Lazar claims the crafts use "gravity amplifiers" – three devices at the base that focus and amplify gravitational waves. These aren't your typical engines; they create a localized anti-gravity field around the craft, allowing it to defy Earth's gravity effortlessly. - **Distorting Space-Time**: Inside this field, the amplifiers bend space-time itself. Think Einstein's relativity on steroids: by projecting a strong gravitational wave ahead, the craft "pulls" space toward it, shortening vast interstellar distances. It's like folding a map so points A and B touch – no need for light-speed travel; you warp the fabric of reality instead. - **Power Source: Element 115**: The key fuel is stable isotopes of Element 115 (now called Moscovium, synthesized in labs but unstable here). When protons bombard it in a reactor, it produces anti-matter, annihilating with matter to generate massive energy (100% efficient, no waste). More crucially, Element 115's superheavy nucleus emits gravity-A waves (a strong nuclear force extension), which the amplifiers harness to create the distortion field. - **How It Works in Flight**: In "delta mode" (for interstellar jumps), the amplifiers tilt to focus the gravity wave forward, creating a "downhill" slope in space-time that the craft "falls" along at incredible speeds. In "omicron mode" (hover/low-speed), it balances against planetary gravity for silent, agile maneuvers – explaining those impossible UFO zigzags. This isn't sci-fi; Lazar says he reverse-engineered nine such discs at S-4 (near Area 51). Watch the attached video clip from his doc where he explains it firsthand! 🤯 Did Bob Lazar really work where he claimed (S-4/Area 51), and if this tech was possible back in 1989, are we already traveling interstellar today? Drop your thoughts below! #BobLazar #UFO #Area51 #Element115 #InterstellarTravel

Interstellar

55,235 views • 7 months ago

Did you know Bob Lazar blew the whistle on alien tech back in 1989? In his documentary, he details how UFOs achieve interstellar travel by distorting space time inside an anti-gravity field. Here's the mind-blowing breakdown, straight from his theories: 👽🛸 **The Core Propulsion System**: Lazar claims the crafts use "gravity amplifiers" – three devices at the base that focus and amplify gravitational waves. These aren't your typical engines; they create a localized anti-gravity field around the craft, allowing it to defy Earth's gravity effortlessly. **Distorting Space-Time**: Inside this field, the amplifiers bend space-time itself. Think Einstein's relativity on steroids: by projecting a strong gravitational wave ahead, the craft "pulls" space toward it, shortening vast interstellar distances. It's like folding a map so points A and B touch – no need for light-speed travel; you warp the fabric of reality instead. **Power Source: Element 115**: The key fuel is stable isotopes of Element 115 (now called Moscovium, synthesized in labs but unstable here). When protons bombard it in a reactor, it produces anti-matter, annihilating with matter to generate massive energy (100% efficient, no waste). More crucially, Element 115's superheavy nucleus emits gravity-A waves (a strong nuclear force extension), which the amplifiers harness to create the distortion field. **How It Works in Flight**: In "delta mode" (for interstellar jumps), the amplifiers tilt to focus the gravity wave forward, creating a "downhill" slope in space-time that the craft "falls" along at incredible speeds. In "omicron mode" (hover/low-speed), it balances against planetary gravity for silent, agile maneuvers – explaining those impossible UFO zigzags. Lazar says he reverse-engineered nine such discs at S-4 (near Area 51).
4:11

Did you know Bob Lazar blew the whistle on alien tech back in 1989? In his documentary, he details how UFOs achieve interstellar travel by distorting space time inside an anti-gravity field. Here's the mind-blowing breakdown, straight from his theories: 👽🛸 **The Core Propulsion System**: Lazar claims the crafts use "gravity amplifiers" – three devices at the base that focus and amplify gravitational waves. These aren't your typical engines; they create a localized anti-gravity field around the craft, allowing it to defy Earth's gravity effortlessly. **Distorting Space-Time**: Inside this field, the amplifiers bend space-time itself. Think Einstein's relativity on steroids: by projecting a strong gravitational wave ahead, the craft "pulls" space toward it, shortening vast interstellar distances. It's like folding a map so points A and B touch – no need for light-speed travel; you warp the fabric of reality instead. **Power Source: Element 115**: The key fuel is stable isotopes of Element 115 (now called Moscovium, synthesized in labs but unstable here). When protons bombard it in a reactor, it produces anti-matter, annihilating with matter to generate massive energy (100% efficient, no waste). More crucially, Element 115's superheavy nucleus emits gravity-A waves (a strong nuclear force extension), which the amplifiers harness to create the distortion field. **How It Works in Flight**: In "delta mode" (for interstellar jumps), the amplifiers tilt to focus the gravity wave forward, creating a "downhill" slope in space-time that the craft "falls" along at incredible speeds. In "omicron mode" (hover/low-speed), it balances against planetary gravity for silent, agile maneuvers – explaining those impossible UFO zigzags. Lazar says he reverse-engineered nine such discs at S-4 (near Area 51).

Interstellar

20,021 views • 2 months ago

This is a breaking podcast. We're premiering a new paradigm for quantizing 4D gravity here first, without strings. Neil Turok — inaugural Higgs Chair at Edinburgh, former director of Perimeter Institute, and 2026 Fellow of the Royal Society — believes quantum gravity may not require strings, extra dimensions, or a multiverse. The key: a 1970s theory called quadratic gravity, long abandoned over two seemingly fatal problems. Turok and Bateman argue both problems dissolve — one by reinterpreting a classical instability as ordinary gravitational expansion, the other by a subtle tweak to the Born rule that allows quantum states of negative norm without ever producing negative probabilities. One quiet assumption, Turok argues, underpins decades of string theory's necessity. Drop it, and the whole case for a multiverse unravels. Neil graciously gave me a sneak peek at his and his PhD student Sam Bateman's new research. Bleeding edge! I hope you enjoy.
1:50

This is a breaking podcast. We're premiering a new paradigm for quantizing 4D gravity here first, without strings. Neil Turok — inaugural Higgs Chair at Edinburgh, former director of Perimeter Institute, and 2026 Fellow of the Royal Society — believes quantum gravity may not require strings, extra dimensions, or a multiverse. The key: a 1970s theory called quadratic gravity, long abandoned over two seemingly fatal problems. Turok and Bateman argue both problems dissolve — one by reinterpreting a classical instability as ordinary gravitational expansion, the other by a subtle tweak to the Born rule that allows quantum states of negative norm without ever producing negative probabilities. One quiet assumption, Turok argues, underpins decades of string theory's necessity. Drop it, and the whole case for a multiverse unravels. Neil graciously gave me a sneak peek at his and his PhD student Sam Bateman's new research. Bleeding edge! I hope you enjoy.

Curt Jaimungal

42,877 views • 2 months ago

What is the Spacetime Aether? Conventional physics would claim that space is an empty vacuum. It discounts the 'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) constantly fluctuating in and out of existence. The Casimir force shows us there is a latent negative energy pressure when we put two parallel plates close to one another. They suddenly attract. There must be quantum fluctuations we can't see. We invented 'dark matter' to explain why there appears to be more stickiness with stars that orbit their galaxies. We invented 'dark energy' to explain how the universe can expand faster than the speed of light. What if we add up all the quantum fluctuations across the cosmos? That would be a massive amount of energy. Could that account for 'dark matter?' What if we take it a step further and assume the quantum fluctuations are just the energy seeping through from a vast ocean of potential energy? Could that account for 'dark energy?' That ocean of energy is Spacetime Aether. Tapping into it represents a new source of practically unlimited power for humanity.
1:52

What is the Spacetime Aether? Conventional physics would claim that space is an empty vacuum. It discounts the 'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) constantly fluctuating in and out of existence. The Casimir force shows us there is a latent negative energy pressure when we put two parallel plates close to one another. They suddenly attract. There must be quantum fluctuations we can't see. We invented 'dark matter' to explain why there appears to be more stickiness with stars that orbit their galaxies. We invented 'dark energy' to explain how the universe can expand faster than the speed of light. What if we add up all the quantum fluctuations across the cosmos? That would be a massive amount of energy. Could that account for 'dark matter?' What if we take it a step further and assume the quantum fluctuations are just the energy seeping through from a vast ocean of potential energy? Could that account for 'dark energy?' That ocean of energy is Spacetime Aether. Tapping into it represents a new source of practically unlimited power for humanity.

Ashton Forbes

92,416 views • 2 years ago

Bob Lazar just dropped a bombshell. He revealed that he replicated the anomalous force which powered the UFO he worked on at Area 51 in his own experiments. “There’s another force—and it’s not gravity.” “There’s gigantic chunks that are missing from physics … ” Watch this incredible exchange he just had with Jesse Michels: Michels: “If you look at dark energy … it’s not one of the four fundamental forces, but it’s just the universe is inflating—” Lazar: “I’m not sure dark energy really exists.” Michels: “And dark matter.” Lazar: “I’m not really buying either one of them.” “It’s a placeholder.” Michels: “As early as the 50s, there’s all this crazy hardcore anti-gravity research.” “And then it kind of disappears.” “The two things that come up for gravity where there’s a lot of smoke, but no fire, is … extremely high electric field differentials creating thrust.” “The second thing is very fast rotating, spinning, superconductors.” Lazar: “But is that actually gravity?” Michels: “So there’s another force.” Lazar: “30 years has gone by, and I’ve been doing my own research.” “And I’m just more convinced that I am right … that there’s another force, and it’s not gravity.” Michels: “What does it look like?” Lazar: “It’s a repelling force.” “I think gravity is just an attractive force.” “I think this other force, you can, to simplify it, push or pull.” “And I think it also affects the flow of time, exactly like gravity does.” “I think it affects light.” Michels: “Have you ever measured this force?” Lazar: “Next question.” “Alright … yeah.” Michels: “You have?” Lazar: “Yeah.” Michels: “Is there anything high level that you can say as far as the goal of your research post-[Area 51]?” Lazar: “To duplicate anything.” Michels: “You think you can?” Lazar: “I’m 100% confident.” Michels: “Have you already gotten some interesting results?” Lazar: “Yeah, that’s why I’m 100% confident.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy
4:27

Bob Lazar just dropped a bombshell. He revealed that he replicated the anomalous force which powered the UFO he worked on at Area 51 in his own experiments. “There’s another force—and it’s not gravity.” “There’s gigantic chunks that are missing from physics … ” Watch this incredible exchange he just had with Jesse Michels: Michels: “If you look at dark energy … it’s not one of the four fundamental forces, but it’s just the universe is inflating—” Lazar: “I’m not sure dark energy really exists.” Michels: “And dark matter.” Lazar: “I’m not really buying either one of them.” “It’s a placeholder.” Michels: “As early as the 50s, there’s all this crazy hardcore anti-gravity research.” “And then it kind of disappears.” “The two things that come up for gravity where there’s a lot of smoke, but no fire, is … extremely high electric field differentials creating thrust.” “The second thing is very fast rotating, spinning, superconductors.” Lazar: “But is that actually gravity?” Michels: “So there’s another force.” Lazar: “30 years has gone by, and I’ve been doing my own research.” “And I’m just more convinced that I am right … that there’s another force, and it’s not gravity.” Michels: “What does it look like?” Lazar: “It’s a repelling force.” “I think gravity is just an attractive force.” “I think this other force, you can, to simplify it, push or pull.” “And I think it also affects the flow of time, exactly like gravity does.” “I think it affects light.” Michels: “Have you ever measured this force?” Lazar: “Next question.” “Alright … yeah.” Michels: “You have?” Lazar: “Yeah.” Michels: “Is there anything high level that you can say as far as the goal of your research post-[Area 51]?” Lazar: “To duplicate anything.” Michels: “You think you can?” Lazar: “I’m 100% confident.” Michels: “Have you already gotten some interesting results?” Lazar: “Yeah, that’s why I’m 100% confident.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

259,693 views • 4 months ago

.mert on why Zcash's privacy isn't privacy for its own sake “In Zcash's case the privacy isn't privacy for its own sake — it's to enable a better monetary property for that asset. One thing you might think of is fungibility” “If a coin has history and you can see its provenance, there is a case in which you will not be allowed to use that coin because of its history. Whereas cash is devoid of all information. If I give you a $5 bill, you don't see anything about where it has been” “One thing people might have missed in the Ironwood upgrade is that it is now quantum recoverable. You've probably heard the panic about Bitcoin's quantum readiness — Zcash is quantum recoverable today, and quantum proof toward the end of autumn” “A store of value fundamentally requires a low entropy channel. Entropy is defined as surprise — you don't want to be surprised. You want to be able to just store it somewhere, and that's that” “Zcash is also scaling: 75-second block times going to 20 seconds, with a target of a few thousand TPS”
2:11

.mert on why Zcash's privacy isn't privacy for its own sake “In Zcash's case the privacy isn't privacy for its own sake — it's to enable a better monetary property for that asset. One thing you might think of is fungibility” “If a coin has history and you can see its provenance, there is a case in which you will not be allowed to use that coin because of its history. Whereas cash is devoid of all information. If I give you a $5 bill, you don't see anything about where it has been” “One thing people might have missed in the Ironwood upgrade is that it is now quantum recoverable. You've probably heard the panic about Bitcoin's quantum readiness — Zcash is quantum recoverable today, and quantum proof toward the end of autumn” “A store of value fundamentally requires a low entropy channel. Entropy is defined as surprise — you don't want to be surprised. You want to be able to just store it somewhere, and that's that” “Zcash is also scaling: 75-second block times going to 20 seconds, with a target of a few thousand TPS”

Will McEvoy

19,657 views • 1 month ago

QUANTUM-LOVE. When two minds meet at a great distance. It's said that when you think deeply about someone, that person feels that love. Love knows no distance because the energy that holds it is faster than light, stronger than gravity, more real than matter itself. In quantum physics, there's a phenomenon called quantum entanglement, in which two particles, regardless of the distance separating them, remain connected in the way that what happens to one particle, is immediately perceived from the other. Maybe when you love someone deeply, when you share your thoughts, feelings and heart rate, something in your brain synchronizes its waves with that person. True love transcends the body. It's an invisible impulse that connects two consciences in a single beat. It's not magic or coincidence: it's connection. When you close your eyes and think of that person, when your heart beats fast for no apparent reason, when their name appears out of nowhere in your mind. Maybe it's because, somewhere in the universe, that person is also thinking about you.
0:30

QUANTUM-LOVE. When two minds meet at a great distance. It's said that when you think deeply about someone, that person feels that love. Love knows no distance because the energy that holds it is faster than light, stronger than gravity, more real than matter itself. In quantum physics, there's a phenomenon called quantum entanglement, in which two particles, regardless of the distance separating them, remain connected in the way that what happens to one particle, is immediately perceived from the other. Maybe when you love someone deeply, when you share your thoughts, feelings and heart rate, something in your brain synchronizes its waves with that person. True love transcends the body. It's an invisible impulse that connects two consciences in a single beat. It's not magic or coincidence: it's connection. When you close your eyes and think of that person, when your heart beats fast for no apparent reason, when their name appears out of nowhere in your mind. Maybe it's because, somewhere in the universe, that person is also thinking about you.

Kekius Maximus

96,809 views • 4 months ago

Robert Bigelow: “The Big Bang is just a theory… nothing to do with fact.” The universe is an open system with no beginning and no end. Mainstream cosmology treats the Big Bang as settled history, yet it leaves the entropy problem unresolved and admits that 95 to 96 percent of the universe consists of dark energy and dark matter we still cannot explain. Bigelow points out that an open system continuously exchanges energy and information, which aligns far better with the observed acceleration and the persistent mysteries of dark energy than a closed, once and done explosion. He ties the same openness to consciousness itself, suggesting the unknown majority of the cosmos may not be inert filler but part of a larger, ongoing process. The data keep revealing how little we actually know. The standard model papers over the gaps.
4:54

Robert Bigelow: “The Big Bang is just a theory… nothing to do with fact.” The universe is an open system with no beginning and no end. Mainstream cosmology treats the Big Bang as settled history, yet it leaves the entropy problem unresolved and admits that 95 to 96 percent of the universe consists of dark energy and dark matter we still cannot explain. Bigelow points out that an open system continuously exchanges energy and information, which aligns far better with the observed acceleration and the persistent mysteries of dark energy than a closed, once and done explosion. He ties the same openness to consciousness itself, suggesting the unknown majority of the cosmos may not be inert filler but part of a larger, ongoing process. The data keep revealing how little we actually know. The standard model papers over the gaps.

Interstellar

46,366 views • 22 days ago

In all four of these great videos from 1970, Laithwaite showed that rotation of a special kind (called "precession") can lift against downward gravity, and even more so when the speed of rotation is increased! We have been using 3-phase power to make disc magnets spin rapidly, around and up a pole. Yet those changes only increase gravitational "potential" energy, and do not act continuously against gravity itself (as we need for a "flying UFO"). None of the systems studied by Laithwaite were "magnetic". He used a power-drill to make his gyroscopes spin. Our 3-phase systems are of course more elegant, but still we can learn a lot about gravity physics, by studying Laithwaite's old results! I will be trying next to incorporate his proven anti-gravity methods into our model devices, but am not yet sure how to do it. It is an "alien IQ test", one might say. We have to "solve" that test to "fly". 🛸
0:39

In all four of these great videos from 1970, Laithwaite showed that rotation of a special kind (called "precession") can lift against downward gravity, and even more so when the speed of rotation is increased! We have been using 3-phase power to make disc magnets spin rapidly, around and up a pole. Yet those changes only increase gravitational "potential" energy, and do not act continuously against gravity itself (as we need for a "flying UFO"). None of the systems studied by Laithwaite were "magnetic". He used a power-drill to make his gyroscopes spin. Our 3-phase systems are of course more elegant, but still we can learn a lot about gravity physics, by studying Laithwaite's old results! I will be trying next to incorporate his proven anti-gravity methods into our model devices, but am not yet sure how to do it. It is an "alien IQ test", one might say. We have to "solve" that test to "fly". 🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

12,810 views • 4 months ago

This is Amy Eskridge. She is one of the 11 scientists who has died/disappeared recently that’s linked to high government research and secrets. Amy researched anti-gravity and in this clip reveals anti-gravity was already discovered 4 times, but each time the government suppressed it. She then reveals she was close to discovering it, but was threatened that she would be killed if she published it. She was found dead shortly after this 2022 interview. It was ruled a “suicide” but no investigation details were made public and British intelligence officer Franc Milburn testified before Congress in 2023 that her death was not a suicide. She also said this a few months before her death: “If you see any report that I killed myself, I most definitely did not.” What is going on? Is our own government murdering scientists whose research and discoveries (i.e. free energy) threaten the profits of corporations and billionaires?
1:35

This is Amy Eskridge. She is one of the 11 scientists who has died/disappeared recently that’s linked to high government research and secrets. Amy researched anti-gravity and in this clip reveals anti-gravity was already discovered 4 times, but each time the government suppressed it. She then reveals she was close to discovering it, but was threatened that she would be killed if she published it. She was found dead shortly after this 2022 interview. It was ruled a “suicide” but no investigation details were made public and British intelligence officer Franc Milburn testified before Congress in 2023 that her death was not a suicide. She also said this a few months before her death: “If you see any report that I killed myself, I most definitely did not.” What is going on? Is our own government murdering scientists whose research and discoveries (i.e. free energy) threaten the profits of corporations and billionaires?

Power to the People ☭🕊

1,478,884 views • 4 months ago

100 years ago, an American inventor named Thomas Townsend Brown believed he found a link between electromagnetism and gravity. He was immediately written off as a quack. But Paul Schatzkin Paul Schatzkin spent a decade plus researching him, and the truth (as you'll find from his incredible book, The Man Who Mastered Gravity), is not so simple: 1) Highly credible witnesses to Brown's anomalous gravity related experiments in science and government include: Edward Teller (Hydrogen Bomb inventor), Curtis LeMay (Air Force General), Bill Lear (Learjet), Paul Alfred Biefeld (physicist), Agnew Bahnson (physics research patron who supported the establishment of quantum gravity) and others (we have quotes from these people in the video, linked below) 2) There is a LOT of evidence Brown's work made it into the B2 Stealth Bomber. There's also a 1942 FBI file on him stating he knew more about radar than anyone else in the Navy; not smoking guns that he cracked anti-gravity (at all), but quickly dispels the illusion his work never amounted to anything 3) We also know through Schatzkin's research, that Brown retrieved exotic propulsion technology from Nazi Germany. Likely from SS officer Hans Kammler's Skoda Works 4) We interview an anonymous (presently active) top Navy Scientist that believes Brown did discover the missing link between electromagnetism and gravity; he presents a novel framework for this link 5) It is my belief that Brown's story is far deeper than meets the eye; it has implications for the nature of time (tightly related to gravity, even in conventional General Relativity) and our understanding of "UFOs and ETs". He was likely CIA office of scientific intelligence (the group probably involved in all UFO and Antigravity related research midcentury) 6) The whole Bob Lazar story is probably best explained through the lens of Thomas Townsend Brown 7) If Brown didn't crack anti-gravity (very open to that), he likely created novel forms of ion-based propulsion in use in very advanced tech today 8) All of Brown's work needs modern and independent replication and corroboration in a vacuum chamber. We'll pay anyone $50,000-100,000 (or more, if necessary, depending on equipment needs) to do this if you let us film it. Special thanks to Nick Cook who also makes an appearance and has extensively researched the history of Aerospace gravity related research (meeting with top Prime Contractor/Defense brass). This couldn't have been made without his incredible book, The Hunt for Zero Point. Watch, if you're ready for a wild, wild ride:
1:14

100 years ago, an American inventor named Thomas Townsend Brown believed he found a link between electromagnetism and gravity. He was immediately written off as a quack. But Paul Schatzkin Paul Schatzkin spent a decade plus researching him, and the truth (as you'll find from his incredible book, The Man Who Mastered Gravity), is not so simple: 1) Highly credible witnesses to Brown's anomalous gravity related experiments in science and government include: Edward Teller (Hydrogen Bomb inventor), Curtis LeMay (Air Force General), Bill Lear (Learjet), Paul Alfred Biefeld (physicist), Agnew Bahnson (physics research patron who supported the establishment of quantum gravity) and others (we have quotes from these people in the video, linked below) 2) There is a LOT of evidence Brown's work made it into the B2 Stealth Bomber. There's also a 1942 FBI file on him stating he knew more about radar than anyone else in the Navy; not smoking guns that he cracked anti-gravity (at all), but quickly dispels the illusion his work never amounted to anything 3) We also know through Schatzkin's research, that Brown retrieved exotic propulsion technology from Nazi Germany. Likely from SS officer Hans Kammler's Skoda Works 4) We interview an anonymous (presently active) top Navy Scientist that believes Brown did discover the missing link between electromagnetism and gravity; he presents a novel framework for this link 5) It is my belief that Brown's story is far deeper than meets the eye; it has implications for the nature of time (tightly related to gravity, even in conventional General Relativity) and our understanding of "UFOs and ETs". He was likely CIA office of scientific intelligence (the group probably involved in all UFO and Antigravity related research midcentury) 6) The whole Bob Lazar story is probably best explained through the lens of Thomas Townsend Brown 7) If Brown didn't crack anti-gravity (very open to that), he likely created novel forms of ion-based propulsion in use in very advanced tech today 8) All of Brown's work needs modern and independent replication and corroboration in a vacuum chamber. We'll pay anyone $50,000-100,000 (or more, if necessary, depending on equipment needs) to do this if you let us film it. Special thanks to Nick Cook who also makes an appearance and has extensively researched the history of Aerospace gravity related research (meeting with top Prime Contractor/Defense brass). This couldn't have been made without his incredible book, The Hunt for Zero Point. Watch, if you're ready for a wild, wild ride:

Jesse Michels

357,591 views • 2 years ago

Amy Eskridge's Anti-Gravity Presentation, one of her last before she tragically passed away. “Even if you do it in the public, it still don't mean that the inventor won't disappear.” In one of her final presentations on antigravity, the brilliant scientist delivered a compelling historical survey of gravity modification research from the Biefeld-Brown effect and early experiments to modern superconducting approaches and propulsion breakthroughs. With inspiring confidence she noted, “I can learn any new field in just 3 months,” while observing how “Promising results always seem to disappear.” Amy’s dedication to advancing these ideas openly through the Institute for Exotic Science was truly visionary. Recently, Congressman Eric Burlison referenced allegations by ex-UK intelligence Operative Franc Milburn that Amy was targeted by a directed energy weapon and could have been murdered by an aerospace contractor. Her passion for unlocking these frontiers leaves an inspiring legacy.
1:04:54

Amy Eskridge's Anti-Gravity Presentation, one of her last before she tragically passed away. “Even if you do it in the public, it still don't mean that the inventor won't disappear.” In one of her final presentations on antigravity, the brilliant scientist delivered a compelling historical survey of gravity modification research from the Biefeld-Brown effect and early experiments to modern superconducting approaches and propulsion breakthroughs. With inspiring confidence she noted, “I can learn any new field in just 3 months,” while observing how “Promising results always seem to disappear.” Amy’s dedication to advancing these ideas openly through the Institute for Exotic Science was truly visionary. Recently, Congressman Eric Burlison referenced allegations by ex-UK intelligence Operative Franc Milburn that Amy was targeted by a directed energy weapon and could have been murdered by an aerospace contractor. Her passion for unlocking these frontiers leaves an inspiring legacy.

Interstellar

86,510 views • 4 months ago

Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 2 of 3 - Ring Magnets and a Spinning Copper Rod (YouTube deleted this experiment as well, labeling it as "medical misinformation.") Around 2010, I wrote a Facebook note titled "Frictionless Flywheel". (Facebook deleted my page of 15 years). In that write-up, I speculated and predicted that... ... if a magnet falls in slow motion down a copper tube... then what would happen if you did the inverse? Drop a magnet ring around a copper rod? It's the same relative motion between the magnet and the copper. So the magnet would tilt at an angle while slightly rotating as it falls in slow motion around the copper. But then I said... "Let's take it one step further... I predict that if you have magnet rings around a copper rod... and then you spin the rod... that the magnet rings would stabilize around the rod from eddy currents." I said, there will be a magnetic bearing effect where the magnet ring will levitate and spin. Because it's following in the wake of the eddy currents produced by the rotating copper. So the magnet should catch up to speed of the copper and match it like the moon to the Earth. Essentially remaining fixed relative to the copper rod... but since the copper is spinning at a high RPM, then the magnet should spin at a high RPM; albeit, with a slight lag. So, abiding by the scientific method, I make an observation of the magnet falling in slow motion. I thought critically about. I get a new idea. Once the new idea passes muster, I allow my self to make a prediction for a scenario that hasn't been tried yet. Worked it out in my mind to see if it was viable. But then I needed to test it. I didn't have the ability to spin a copper rod at a high enough RPM that I theorized would be needed. So I communicated with my friend Josh Toms We had been talking about different experiments for quite a while. Josh is a real experimenter and a good man. He tests things before he speaks on them and when he speaks, it's with an informed opinion. He sent me a copper sphere about 2 inches in diameter and taught me some cool stuff about eddy currents I hadn't seen when sending each other clips of experiments we were working on. I explained the concept of the "frictionless flywheel" and my prediction that the magnets would levitate and stabilize around the copper rod if it was fast enough. So Josh built a platform using an angle grinder as a motor to spin a copper rod. He put very strong NdFeB magnets around the 1 inch diameter copper rod. IT WORKED! Josh brought this platform to the Tesla Technology Conference in Albuquerque, NM in 2010 where we met up. I filmed the demonstration of the platform you see in this video. There was a young boy who was fascinated by some of the magnet demonstrations I and others were giving at the conference. So I was explaining the process of what was happening to the inquisitive kid. Again.. what you notice here is that the eddy currents act as a force field to prevent friction between the magnets and copper. There is a stable gap and "magnetic cushion" that forms after a certain RPM. (Dependent upon the mass/gauss of the magnet in relation to the diamagnetic quality/mass of the copper or material in motion.) And what is super interesting to me is that once again... you can violently shake the entire platform and it WILL NOT disturb the magnets. The will not touch that copper after a certain RPM. You could make violent 90˚ turns and from the perspective of the magnets... it's just moving in slow motion relative to the copper. Just like how the magnet falls in slow motion relative to the copper down the tube. But this is just at a higher velocity relative to a stationary observer viewing the rotating system. But it doesn't matter if it's a centripetally rotating system at a constant velocity or linear acceleration in a particular direction... those eddy currents act as a force field to protect whatever is relative to the magnets and/or copper in those moments. So the claim and prediction that a frictionless flywheel effect and magnetic bearing would take place between a ring magnet and spinning copper rod DEMONSTRATED to be true. Now "PROVING" this scenario means to derive mathematical equations to justify an explanation of how the end results arise. Spinning magnets on a copper rod doesn't prove anything. In science... proof is math. Experiments can never prove anything. Experiments never provide equations or numbers or variables. Experiments provide evidence. You collect the evidence FIRST... AFTER doing real-world, hands-on experimentation. Anything else is just armchair research and talk. You write the proofs on paper to describe how you think things happen. And your proofs must abide by the constraints of the model you use. Sure... you can use a mathematical artifice like Lorentz invariance (relativity) to prove the end results arise because of: dark matter accumulating between the magnet and copper. Or that it must be space-time curvature bending... Or that it must be because of the aether rippling and vortexing... Or because of the dynamic casimir effect or zero point energy. Or anti-gravity. NOPE! None of those things are needed in the explanations I offer for any experiments and real-world data collected. I use the framework of what I call GALILEAN VARIANCE. Good ol' classical physics in 3D Euclidean space. No 4th dimension. No space-time. No aether. No nonsense. Only Newtonian Mechanics and elementary math.... but with a twist! ... and under.. "a new light". I have a completely different interpretation as to what gravity is and the mechanism of how it arises. Issac Newton never claimed to have a theory for the CAUSE of gravity. Newton's brilliant work and optics describes the behavior of matter and energy within a gravitational field. But he never claimed to know what causes gravity. "I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not form any hypotheses." - Newton However... I do claim to have an explanation for the cause and mechanism of gravity. And it means a total abandonment of relativity and half of QED. Gravity IS a force! (and an emission) Eddy currents are not gravity. Magnetism is not gravity. And the kicker... gravity is not electric either. It's an illusion. Gravity is not an illusion. But the illusion is that people think gravity is electric. It's not. I have a completely different take. And boy has it gotten me in a lot of trouble and banned from speaking time and time again. But... if the information is valid... then trying to suppress it is like trying to hold an inflated basketball under water. Your arms are gonna get tired eventually and things are gonna come up to the surface with spring-loaded force. Equal to the amount people tried holding it back. The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity
2:36

Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 2 of 3 - Ring Magnets and a Spinning Copper Rod (YouTube deleted this experiment as well, labeling it as "medical misinformation.") Around 2010, I wrote a Facebook note titled "Frictionless Flywheel". (Facebook deleted my page of 15 years). In that write-up, I speculated and predicted that... ... if a magnet falls in slow motion down a copper tube... then what would happen if you did the inverse? Drop a magnet ring around a copper rod? It's the same relative motion between the magnet and the copper. So the magnet would tilt at an angle while slightly rotating as it falls in slow motion around the copper. But then I said... "Let's take it one step further... I predict that if you have magnet rings around a copper rod... and then you spin the rod... that the magnet rings would stabilize around the rod from eddy currents." I said, there will be a magnetic bearing effect where the magnet ring will levitate and spin. Because it's following in the wake of the eddy currents produced by the rotating copper. So the magnet should catch up to speed of the copper and match it like the moon to the Earth. Essentially remaining fixed relative to the copper rod... but since the copper is spinning at a high RPM, then the magnet should spin at a high RPM; albeit, with a slight lag. So, abiding by the scientific method, I make an observation of the magnet falling in slow motion. I thought critically about. I get a new idea. Once the new idea passes muster, I allow my self to make a prediction for a scenario that hasn't been tried yet. Worked it out in my mind to see if it was viable. But then I needed to test it. I didn't have the ability to spin a copper rod at a high enough RPM that I theorized would be needed. So I communicated with my friend Josh Toms We had been talking about different experiments for quite a while. Josh is a real experimenter and a good man. He tests things before he speaks on them and when he speaks, it's with an informed opinion. He sent me a copper sphere about 2 inches in diameter and taught me some cool stuff about eddy currents I hadn't seen when sending each other clips of experiments we were working on. I explained the concept of the "frictionless flywheel" and my prediction that the magnets would levitate and stabilize around the copper rod if it was fast enough. So Josh built a platform using an angle grinder as a motor to spin a copper rod. He put very strong NdFeB magnets around the 1 inch diameter copper rod. IT WORKED! Josh brought this platform to the Tesla Technology Conference in Albuquerque, NM in 2010 where we met up. I filmed the demonstration of the platform you see in this video. There was a young boy who was fascinated by some of the magnet demonstrations I and others were giving at the conference. So I was explaining the process of what was happening to the inquisitive kid. Again.. what you notice here is that the eddy currents act as a force field to prevent friction between the magnets and copper. There is a stable gap and "magnetic cushion" that forms after a certain RPM. (Dependent upon the mass/gauss of the magnet in relation to the diamagnetic quality/mass of the copper or material in motion.) And what is super interesting to me is that once again... you can violently shake the entire platform and it WILL NOT disturb the magnets. The will not touch that copper after a certain RPM. You could make violent 90˚ turns and from the perspective of the magnets... it's just moving in slow motion relative to the copper. Just like how the magnet falls in slow motion relative to the copper down the tube. But this is just at a higher velocity relative to a stationary observer viewing the rotating system. But it doesn't matter if it's a centripetally rotating system at a constant velocity or linear acceleration in a particular direction... those eddy currents act as a force field to protect whatever is relative to the magnets and/or copper in those moments. So the claim and prediction that a frictionless flywheel effect and magnetic bearing would take place between a ring magnet and spinning copper rod DEMONSTRATED to be true. Now "PROVING" this scenario means to derive mathematical equations to justify an explanation of how the end results arise. Spinning magnets on a copper rod doesn't prove anything. In science... proof is math. Experiments can never prove anything. Experiments never provide equations or numbers or variables. Experiments provide evidence. You collect the evidence FIRST... AFTER doing real-world, hands-on experimentation. Anything else is just armchair research and talk. You write the proofs on paper to describe how you think things happen. And your proofs must abide by the constraints of the model you use. Sure... you can use a mathematical artifice like Lorentz invariance (relativity) to prove the end results arise because of: dark matter accumulating between the magnet and copper. Or that it must be space-time curvature bending... Or that it must be because of the aether rippling and vortexing... Or because of the dynamic casimir effect or zero point energy. Or anti-gravity. NOPE! None of those things are needed in the explanations I offer for any experiments and real-world data collected. I use the framework of what I call GALILEAN VARIANCE. Good ol' classical physics in 3D Euclidean space. No 4th dimension. No space-time. No aether. No nonsense. Only Newtonian Mechanics and elementary math.... but with a twist! ... and under.. "a new light". I have a completely different interpretation as to what gravity is and the mechanism of how it arises. Issac Newton never claimed to have a theory for the CAUSE of gravity. Newton's brilliant work and optics describes the behavior of matter and energy within a gravitational field. But he never claimed to know what causes gravity. "I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not form any hypotheses." - Newton However... I do claim to have an explanation for the cause and mechanism of gravity. And it means a total abandonment of relativity and half of QED. Gravity IS a force! (and an emission) Eddy currents are not gravity. Magnetism is not gravity. And the kicker... gravity is not electric either. It's an illusion. Gravity is not an illusion. But the illusion is that people think gravity is electric. It's not. I have a completely different take. And boy has it gotten me in a lot of trouble and banned from speaking time and time again. But... if the information is valid... then trying to suppress it is like trying to hold an inflated basketball under water. Your arms are gonna get tired eventually and things are gonna come up to the surface with spring-loaded force. Equal to the amount people tried holding it back. The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

45,879 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Bob Lazar : We can travel millions of light years through interstellar space 🛸😱 He explains how to create an INTENSE gravitational field that literally distorts space-time… letting a craft “fall” millions of light-years in almost no time. No faster-than-light travel required—just bending reality itself. 🌀🛸 The theory in simple terms: There are two types of gravity. “Gravity B” is the one we feel (planets, stars). “Gravity A” is the tiny but insanely strong force inside atoms. Amplify Gravity A using a stable superheavy element… and you generate a gravitational field so powerful it warps space in front of the craft and contracts it behind. The ship basically surfs its own wave through spacetime. Mind-blowing. Bob Lazar could be the single most important name in modern UFO lore. In 1989 he went public claiming he worked at a secret site near Area 51 (S-4) reverse-engineering alien craft. He put Area 51 on the map for the entire world. His story launched decades of documentaries, congressional hearings, whistleblower momentum, and endless debate. Hero to millions, hoax to others—either way, he changed the conversation forever. And element 115? Lazar described it in 1989 as the fuel that powers the gravity amplifiers… 14 years before scientists officially created element 115 (Moscovium) in a lab in 2003. The version we made decays in milliseconds and doesn’t do antigravity. But he claimed a stable isotope exists somewhere. Still no public stable 115 found… so was he early, wrong, or does someone have the real stuff hidden? 🤔 Watch the clip and tell me: Do you think Lazar was telling the truth? Or was this all an elaborate story? Drop your hottest take below 👇 #UFO #BobLazar #Element115 #Area51 #Aliens #UAP #Gravity #SpaceTime #Disclosure
5:21

🚨 Bob Lazar : We can travel millions of light years through interstellar space 🛸😱 He explains how to create an INTENSE gravitational field that literally distorts space-time… letting a craft “fall” millions of light-years in almost no time. No faster-than-light travel required—just bending reality itself. 🌀🛸 The theory in simple terms: There are two types of gravity. “Gravity B” is the one we feel (planets, stars). “Gravity A” is the tiny but insanely strong force inside atoms. Amplify Gravity A using a stable superheavy element… and you generate a gravitational field so powerful it warps space in front of the craft and contracts it behind. The ship basically surfs its own wave through spacetime. Mind-blowing. Bob Lazar could be the single most important name in modern UFO lore. In 1989 he went public claiming he worked at a secret site near Area 51 (S-4) reverse-engineering alien craft. He put Area 51 on the map for the entire world. His story launched decades of documentaries, congressional hearings, whistleblower momentum, and endless debate. Hero to millions, hoax to others—either way, he changed the conversation forever. And element 115? Lazar described it in 1989 as the fuel that powers the gravity amplifiers… 14 years before scientists officially created element 115 (Moscovium) in a lab in 2003. The version we made decays in milliseconds and doesn’t do antigravity. But he claimed a stable isotope exists somewhere. Still no public stable 115 found… so was he early, wrong, or does someone have the real stuff hidden? 🤔 Watch the clip and tell me: Do you think Lazar was telling the truth? Or was this all an elaborate story? Drop your hottest take below 👇 #UFO #BobLazar #Element115 #Area51 #Aliens #UAP #Gravity #SpaceTime #Disclosure

Interstellar

19,037 views • 7 months ago