正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

What is the Spacetime Aether? Conventional physics would claim that space is an empty vacuum. It discounts the 'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) constantly fluctuating in and out of existence. The Casimir force shows us there is a latent negative energy pressure when we put two parallel plates close to one... another. They suddenly attract. There must be quantum fluctuations we can't see. We invented 'dark matter' to explain why there appears to be more stickiness with stars that orbit their galaxies. We invented 'dark energy' to explain how the universe can expand faster than the speed of light. What if we add up all the quantum fluctuations across the cosmos? That would be a massive amount of energy. Could that account for 'dark matter?' What if we take it a step further and assume the quantum fluctuations are just the energy seeping through from a vast ocean of potential energy? Could that account for 'dark energy?' That ocean of energy is Spacetime Aether. Tapping into it represents a new source of practically unlimited power for humanity.show more

Ashton Forbes

300,884 subscribers

92,416 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Mo₿erg 'Mo' 𐤊 的头像

Mo₿erg 'Mo' 𐤊2 年前

If you are digging so much into aether, you surely know that all these old world buildings were in fact harvesting the energy. It's since then been taken from us, but you probably knew that already. @88marciaramalho did an eye opening on documentary on the topic. Never will you see the old world in the same light.

Ashton Forbes 的头像

Ashton Forbes2 年前

@88marciaramalho Like the pyramids? I feel like the power plant theory is practically the leading theory now. No way was that thing a tomb.

🐰 的头像

🐰2 年前

This is the most sensible theory and explanation I've heard in years. It could basically still preserve the current laws of thermodynamics, but additionally there could be a new way to draw from a virtually infinite energy source which is the vast 'emptiness' of space...

Ashton Forbes 的头像

Ashton Forbes2 年前

Precisely. We don’t even have to completely rewrite the laws of thermodynamics. Just reinterpret them.

Pacman vs 的头像

Pacman vs2 年前

Don’t you find it mind boggling that you started this denouncing a weird state crime… and now you’re what? The loudest voice in modern physics globally? Any chance they eventually make you pick who you’ll end up being?

Shelnutt 的头像

Shelnutt2 年前

Is this similar to what Terrence Howard was explaining to Rogan?

Ashton Forbes 的头像

Ashton Forbes2 年前

Yes. I almost reference Terrence Howard but decided to keep it more brief. When he's talking about the in-folded/out-folded geometry I think he's talking about the interaction of the Aether with what we see (mass). I'll probably do another video on Phase Conjugation and radars.

𝓡𝓮𝓭𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽 的头像

𝓡𝓮𝓭𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽2 年前

Exotic particles might as well be the modern Æther, just with additional complexities😅

Ashton Forbes 的头像

Ashton Forbes2 年前

Aether with extra steps. Rick and Morty is predictive programming.

DualitySync 的头像

DualitySync2 年前

Great Explanation

Ashton Forbes 的头像

Ashton Forbes2 年前

Thanks! 🙏I hope it made sense. I'm getting bolder the more science I learn.

相关视频

Sakharov theorized that gravity came from the quantum vacuum fluctuations based on Feynman's Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Nobel prize in 1965. Eric W. Davis says, "we already know and a lot of other physicists know that Einstein proved that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature. It emerges from the fabric of spacetime when curved." Gravity comes from energy density and is a pressure force. The Casimir effect is a negative pressure force that pushes out zero point energy fluctuations. The mainstream view of physics is woefully incomplete. We can manipulate gravity and produce 'free' energy from the zero point energy.

Sakharov theorized that gravity came from the quantum vacuum fluctuations based on Feynman's Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) Nobel prize in 1965. Eric W. Davis says, "we already know and a lot of other physicists know that Einstein proved that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature. It emerges from the fabric of spacetime when curved." Gravity comes from energy density and is a pressure force. The Casimir effect is a negative pressure force that pushes out zero point energy fluctuations. The mainstream view of physics is woefully incomplete. We can manipulate gravity and produce 'free' energy from the zero point energy.

Ashton Forbes

99,080 次观看 • 1 年前

The Aether is the 5th Dimension we don't see. It is the medium for the propagation of electromagnetic waves. The pressure between the Spacetime Aether and Mass is the scalar potential, represented as gravity. The Aether explains Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Red Shift of light we rationalize as the expansion of the Universe.

The Aether is the 5th Dimension we don't see. It is the medium for the propagation of electromagnetic waves. The pressure between the Spacetime Aether and Mass is the scalar potential, represented as gravity. The Aether explains Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Red Shift of light we rationalize as the expansion of the Universe.

Ashton Forbes

139,428 次观看 • 2 年前

Black project physicists and engineers have been trying to tell us for decades that spacetime is not empty. We live in an ocean of energy. The Zero Point Energy is driving everything.

Black project physicists and engineers have been trying to tell us for decades that spacetime is not empty. We live in an ocean of energy. The Zero Point Energy is driving everything.

Ashton Forbes

36,394 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: Solar is already the source of the vast majority of Earth's energy. “A lot of people would say, well solar, can that really provide the energy that we need? A lot of people don't perhaps appreciate that solar energy is already the source of the vast majority of Earth's energy. Without solar power, we would be a frozen ice ball at about 3 or 4 degrees above absolute zero. So really, all we're talking about for solar electricity is taking the tiny, tiny bit of energy that humanity needs for electricity, which I emphasize is super tiny compared to the amount of solar energy that hits the Earth. You could generate all the electricity that the United States needs with about a 100 mile by 100 mile grid of solar power. So you just take like a corner of Arizona, and that would be all the energy that the United States needs.” From: / Youtube, December 4, 2011

Elon Musk: Solar is already the source of the vast majority of Earth's energy. “A lot of people would say, well solar, can that really provide the energy that we need? A lot of people don't perhaps appreciate that solar energy is already the source of the vast majority of Earth's energy. Without solar power, we would be a frozen ice ball at about 3 or 4 degrees above absolute zero. So really, all we're talking about for solar electricity is taking the tiny, tiny bit of energy that humanity needs for electricity, which I emphasize is super tiny compared to the amount of solar energy that hits the Earth. You could generate all the electricity that the United States needs with about a 100 mile by 100 mile grid of solar power. So you just take like a corner of Arizona, and that would be all the energy that the United States needs.” From: / Youtube, December 4, 2011

ELON CLIPS

39,698 次观看 • 1 年前

So called empty space isn't empty at all. It's full of energy, and that energy is electromagnetic in nature. When they calculated the amount of energy, they found it to be infinite, so they renormalized it. We don't feel this energy because we're in an equilibrium with it, but if conditioned correctly it can be harnessed. Atoms are sitting in a sea of energy.

So called empty space isn't empty at all. It's full of energy, and that energy is electromagnetic in nature. When they calculated the amount of energy, they found it to be infinite, so they renormalized it. We don't feel this energy because we're in an equilibrium with it, but if conditioned correctly it can be harnessed. Atoms are sitting in a sea of energy.

Ashton Forbes

20,347 次观看 • 2 个月前

Nick Fuentes is whitepilled seeing the energy surrounding James Fishback’s campaign in Florida 🍊 “The energy is there. We have to open up a space and we have to incubate this energy. We can't let all of it be dissipated in copium for Trump.”

Nick Fuentes is whitepilled seeing the energy surrounding James Fishback’s campaign in Florida 🍊 “The energy is there. We have to open up a space and we have to incubate this energy. We can't let all of it be dissipated in copium for Trump.”

Fuentes Updates

82,573 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon: If we capture a millionth of the sun, it would change everything "We say that our goal is to even get a millionth of the sun’s energy. That would be more than a thousand times as much energy as could possibly be produced on Earth.” Source; Unlocked Project YT Elon Musk

Elon: If we capture a millionth of the sun, it would change everything "We say that our goal is to even get a millionth of the sun’s energy. That would be more than a thousand times as much energy as could possibly be produced on Earth.” Source; Unlocked Project YT Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

20,135 次观看 • 6 个月前

Chris Camillo explains how Bloom Energy is solving AI data center energy usage problems… “ $BE is one of the only companies in the world that has a method to essentially bring almost an infinite amount of energy to these data centers." And we won't get into all the technology, but they are now working with hyperscalers and they are a resource for energy that will allow a data center to get ramped up quicker. "So, even though it costs a little bit more money today to put an energy cell from Bloom, an energy box from Bloom, which are energy cells, it essentially takes things like natural gas, but instead of burning the natural gas, there is a chemical process that turns that natural gas into energy for the data center."

Chris Camillo explains how Bloom Energy is solving AI data center energy usage problems… “ $BE is one of the only companies in the world that has a method to essentially bring almost an infinite amount of energy to these data centers." And we won't get into all the technology, but they are now working with hyperscalers and they are a resource for energy that will allow a data center to get ramped up quicker. "So, even though it costs a little bit more money today to put an energy cell from Bloom, an energy box from Bloom, which are energy cells, it essentially takes things like natural gas, but instead of burning the natural gas, there is a chemical process that turns that natural gas into energy for the data center."

The Iced Coffee Hour

276,694 次观看 • 2 个月前

Few realize how close we are to a complete Physics revolution. Particle physics is about to be replaced by quantum-wave theory. There is no inconsistency between quantum and macro. Mass is energy. Standing waves produce coherence. The double slit experiment is the gateway to our new understanding. Think about what the answer must be. The electron is traversing all possible paths. How? Space is not empty. All points in space and time are connected. We can travel faster than the speed of light.

Few realize how close we are to a complete Physics revolution. Particle physics is about to be replaced by quantum-wave theory. There is no inconsistency between quantum and macro. Mass is energy. Standing waves produce coherence. The double slit experiment is the gateway to our new understanding. Think about what the answer must be. The electron is traversing all possible paths. How? Space is not empty. All points in space and time are connected. We can travel faster than the speed of light.

Ashton Forbes

132,641 次观看 • 1 年前

David Kipping on why building AI megastructures might be the strongest evidence that we're alone in the universe: The argument starts with something we can already observe: how much energy AI consumes. "One thing we see already with these AI models is how energy hungry they are." P(David|Kipping) ∝ P(Kipping|David) P(David) extrapolates from there. If the only purpose of these data centers is to compute as much as possible as fast as possible, then they'll demand vast amounts of energy. And the orbital data centers that billionaires are getting excited about wouldn't be invisible to us. He explains that such structures would leave a detectable signature: "We should probably see that in James Webb. We could probably already put limits on the existence of essentially artificial rings... emitting a lot of infrared because they're warm." Then comes the unsettling turn. If humanity can build these machines, so could anyone else. And that carries a dark implication. "But if we make that breakthrough, I think the biggest point is it seems to imply that we are alone. Because if we can do it, surely someone else could have done it." This connects to what he refers to as Hart's Fact A. The strange observation that everything we look at in the cosmos appears completely natural: "Everything about the universe: we see stars, galaxies, clouds of plasma. Everything is consistent with nature. There's no hint anywhere of anything artificial, no engineering, nothing in the whole universe. As far as we can see, that's true. That is weird." The more powerful the technology we can imagine, the worse that silence looks. Dyson spheres everywhere, colonising wherever they want, faster-than-light spaceships if any of that is achievable, the sky should be full of evidence. It isn't. "It just massively exacerbates the Fermi paradox to the point where you'd probably conclude this is it." His honest conclusion: "It would make me even more pessimistic about the probabilities of intelligent life in the universe."

David Kipping on why building AI megastructures might be the strongest evidence that we're alone in the universe: The argument starts with something we can already observe: how much energy AI consumes. "One thing we see already with these AI models is how energy hungry they are." P(David|Kipping) ∝ P(Kipping|David) P(David) extrapolates from there. If the only purpose of these data centers is to compute as much as possible as fast as possible, then they'll demand vast amounts of energy. And the orbital data centers that billionaires are getting excited about wouldn't be invisible to us. He explains that such structures would leave a detectable signature: "We should probably see that in James Webb. We could probably already put limits on the existence of essentially artificial rings... emitting a lot of infrared because they're warm." Then comes the unsettling turn. If humanity can build these machines, so could anyone else. And that carries a dark implication. "But if we make that breakthrough, I think the biggest point is it seems to imply that we are alone. Because if we can do it, surely someone else could have done it." This connects to what he refers to as Hart's Fact A. The strange observation that everything we look at in the cosmos appears completely natural: "Everything about the universe: we see stars, galaxies, clouds of plasma. Everything is consistent with nature. There's no hint anywhere of anything artificial, no engineering, nothing in the whole universe. As far as we can see, that's true. That is weird." The more powerful the technology we can imagine, the worse that silence looks. Dyson spheres everywhere, colonising wherever they want, faster-than-light spaceships if any of that is achievable, the sky should be full of evidence. It isn't. "It just massively exacerbates the Fermi paradox to the point where you'd probably conclude this is it." His honest conclusion: "It would make me even more pessimistic about the probabilities of intelligent life in the universe."

High Signal AI

10,431 次观看 • 2 个月前

Physicist Michio Kaku notes that the universe is only 4% atoms (visible matter), alongside 23% dark matter and 73% dark energy. He describes dark matter as a mysterious halo that lacks interaction, stabilizing galaxies and possibly hinting at parallel dimensions, though its true nature remains unknown. Atomic Limitation: Kaku challenges the common belief that everything is made of atoms. Atoms form just 4% of the cosmos, and the heavier elements making up humans account for a mere 0.03%. What is Dark Matter? It is an invisible form of matter that possesses gravity but ignores light and electromagnetic forces. It is essential for preventing rapidly spinning galaxies from tearing apart. Parallel Universe Theory: Kaku suggests dark matter might be ordinary matter in an adjacent, parallel dimension. Because gravity can cross dimensions, its pull bleeds into our universe, appearing to us as dark matter. "Physicists are Made of Atoms": Kaku often notes that physicists are essentially atoms trying to understand themselves, highlighting the deep link between human consciousness and the fundamental building blocks of the cosmos. The Unknown: Despite ongoing research, dark matter and dark energy, often called the "dark side" of the universe, remain among the greatest unsolved mysteries in physics.

Physicist Michio Kaku notes that the universe is only 4% atoms (visible matter), alongside 23% dark matter and 73% dark energy. He describes dark matter as a mysterious halo that lacks interaction, stabilizing galaxies and possibly hinting at parallel dimensions, though its true nature remains unknown. Atomic Limitation: Kaku challenges the common belief that everything is made of atoms. Atoms form just 4% of the cosmos, and the heavier elements making up humans account for a mere 0.03%. What is Dark Matter? It is an invisible form of matter that possesses gravity but ignores light and electromagnetic forces. It is essential for preventing rapidly spinning galaxies from tearing apart. Parallel Universe Theory: Kaku suggests dark matter might be ordinary matter in an adjacent, parallel dimension. Because gravity can cross dimensions, its pull bleeds into our universe, appearing to us as dark matter. "Physicists are Made of Atoms": Kaku often notes that physicists are essentially atoms trying to understand themselves, highlighting the deep link between human consciousness and the fundamental building blocks of the cosmos. The Unknown: Despite ongoing research, dark matter and dark energy, often called the "dark side" of the universe, remain among the greatest unsolved mysteries in physics.

Kekius Maximus

14,315 次观看 • 16 天前

The Serpent 🐍 The Spiral 🌀 The Shape of Reality? "Modern science" says gravity is the BENDING of spacetime (Relativity) - mass causes curves, and ENERGY follows them. BUT, a "new" theory, Spacetime Torsional Resonance (STR), suggests that space doesn’t just bend... it TWISTS. Spirals, double helixes, and vortices, energy moves as a TORTIONAL flow. A “new” idea that might actually be ANCIENT. Across cultures, we see entwined serpents: ⚕️ Caduceus 🐉 Cosmic dragons 🌀 Kundalini 🐍 Naga, Ouroboros What if the SERPENT symbolises the "duality and motion" of energy itself - the hidden SYMBOL of life and the universe? And what science now calls “dark matter”... what the ancients knew as AETHER - the living medium of energetic flow, resonance, and CREATION?

The Serpent 🐍 The Spiral 🌀 The Shape of Reality? "Modern science" says gravity is the BENDING of spacetime (Relativity) - mass causes curves, and ENERGY follows them. BUT, a "new" theory, Spacetime Torsional Resonance (STR), suggests that space doesn’t just bend... it TWISTS. Spirals, double helixes, and vortices, energy moves as a TORTIONAL flow. A “new” idea that might actually be ANCIENT. Across cultures, we see entwined serpents: ⚕️ Caduceus 🐉 Cosmic dragons 🌀 Kundalini 🐍 Naga, Ouroboros What if the SERPENT symbolises the "duality and motion" of energy itself - the hidden SYMBOL of life and the universe? And what science now calls “dark matter”... what the ancients knew as AETHER - the living medium of energetic flow, resonance, and CREATION?

WhatdoIknow

32,879 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON MUSK: The Sun produces an enormous amount of energy every second. Even taking a tiny slice of that energy would be thousands of times more than all the power humans generate on Earth today. It shows how small our current energy use is compared to what exists in space.

ELON MUSK: The Sun produces an enormous amount of energy every second. Even taking a tiny slice of that energy would be thousands of times more than all the power humans generate on Earth today. It shows how small our current energy use is compared to what exists in space.

DogeDesigner

42,283 次观看 • 6 个月前

David Friedberg: Big, Beautiful Bill Could Be Huge for Nuclear Energy "I'm not a huge fan of being dependent on government subsidized energy at all." "If the government is having to play a role in funding stuff, there's something really questionable in terms of our sustainability on that energy production source." "Because what you want is not just to make a bunch of energy in the next 6-12 years, you wanna make sure that you've got an engine for creating new energy production on a continuous basis, so we climb non-linearly, the energy production curve." "That's what we need to do." "And I hope one of the key outputs of this, which a lot of people are really unhappy about, the loss of the demand for solar and wind because of the loss of the government programs here, but what I'm hopeful for is it creates a natural market force for nuclear." "... I do think one of the potential benefits of removing those clean energy tax credits is that we actually see natural market forces drive demand for a more naturally sustainable, scalable energy production source."

David Friedberg: Big, Beautiful Bill Could Be Huge for Nuclear Energy "I'm not a huge fan of being dependent on government subsidized energy at all." "If the government is having to play a role in funding stuff, there's something really questionable in terms of our sustainability on that energy production source." "Because what you want is not just to make a bunch of energy in the next 6-12 years, you wanna make sure that you've got an engine for creating new energy production on a continuous basis, so we climb non-linearly, the energy production curve." "That's what we need to do." "And I hope one of the key outputs of this, which a lot of people are really unhappy about, the loss of the demand for solar and wind because of the loss of the government programs here, but what I'm hopeful for is it creates a natural market force for nuclear." "... I do think one of the potential benefits of removing those clean energy tax credits is that we actually see natural market forces drive demand for a more naturally sustainable, scalable energy production source."

The All-In Podcast

59,960 次观看 • 1 年前

Zero Point Energy represents a paradigm shift in technology. An unlimited reservoir of energy that we can tap into. This science is so ontologically shocking that it can break people's minds. The implications of how it has been hidden and why are monumental.

Zero Point Energy represents a paradigm shift in technology. An unlimited reservoir of energy that we can tap into. This science is so ontologically shocking that it can break people's minds. The implications of how it has been hidden and why are monumental.

Ashton Forbes

45,111 次观看 • 1 年前

Can we talk about zero point energy? It's the energy of 'empty space.' So there really is an Aether because electromagnetic waves must have a medium. Even Einstein agreed space can bend and warp.

Can we talk about zero point energy? It's the energy of 'empty space.' So there really is an Aether because electromagnetic waves must have a medium. Even Einstein agreed space can bend and warp.

Ashton Forbes

25,516 次观看 • 25 天前

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Historic Vids

2,424,168 次观看 • 2 年前

We do not have to choose – whether we strike a military target or energy. He sells this energy. He sells oil. So is it energy, or is it a military target? Honestly, it’s the same thing. He sells oil, takes the money, invests it in weapons. And with those weapons, he kills Ukrainians. What is a Ukrainian supposed to do? There are two ways. We either build weapons and strike their weapons. Or we strike the source where their money is generated and multiplied. And that source is their energy sector. That is what is happening. All of this is a legitimate target for us. And who else could have done this to the Russians before us? No one.

We do not have to choose – whether we strike a military target or energy. He sells this energy. He sells oil. So is it energy, or is it a military target? Honestly, it’s the same thing. He sells oil, takes the money, invests it in weapons. And with those weapons, he kills Ukrainians. What is a Ukrainian supposed to do? There are two ways. We either build weapons and strike their weapons. Or we strike the source where their money is generated and multiplied. And that source is their energy sector. That is what is happening. All of this is a legitimate target for us. And who else could have done this to the Russians before us? No one.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

369,547 次观看 • 5 个月前

Hal Puthoff (1994) explains zero-point fluctuations. "The particles fluctuations generate the fields. The fields cause the particles to fluctuate. And you can do the calculation and show that accounts for where the vacuum fluctuations come from. It's a giant cosmological feedback system." The Universe is a sea of energy.

Hal Puthoff (1994) explains zero-point fluctuations. "The particles fluctuations generate the fields. The fields cause the particles to fluctuate. And you can do the calculation and show that accounts for where the vacuum fluctuations come from. It's a giant cosmological feedback system." The Universe is a sea of energy.

Ashton Forbes

36,642 次观看 • 1 年前