Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Gladiator 2 could have been the craziest sequel ever made. Nick Cave wrote a sequel where Maximus is resurrected, sent back to Earth by gods to kill a rising religious figure who resembles Christ. Russell Crowe read it and said: “Don’t like it, mate”

RealEmirHan's profile picture

Emir Han

374,819 subscribers

1,577,240 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморИскусствоНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Gladiator 2 nearly went completely off the rails. Nick Cave wrote a sequel where Maximus is resurrected and ordered by the gods to kill a Christ-like figure. Russell Crowe’s response? “Don’t like it, mate.”
1:18

Gladiator 2 nearly went completely off the rails. Nick Cave wrote a sequel where Maximus is resurrected and ordered by the gods to kill a Christ-like figure. Russell Crowe’s response? “Don’t like it, mate.”

Jordan⛓️‍💥

20,669 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Gladiator 2 is the most unnecessary sequel ever made. The plot is boring, the tone is awful, and Paul Mescal simply doesn’t fit. Russell Crowe said: “It is example of people not understanding what made first one special”
0:36

Gladiator 2 is the most unnecessary sequel ever made. The plot is boring, the tone is awful, and Paul Mescal simply doesn’t fit. Russell Crowe said: “It is example of people not understanding what made first one special”

Emir Han

608,822 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Gladiator 2 might be the most unnecessary sequel ever made. The plot is uninteresting, the tone is nothing like the original, and Paul Mescal simply doesn’t fit. Russell Crowe said: “It is example of people in that engine room not understanding what made first one special.”
0:36

Gladiator 2 might be the most unnecessary sequel ever made. The plot is uninteresting, the tone is nothing like the original, and Paul Mescal simply doesn’t fit. Russell Crowe said: “It is example of people in that engine room not understanding what made first one special.”

Emir Han

2,226,173 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Russell Crowe slams ‘GLADIATOR 2’ “I think the sequel is a really unfortunate example of even the people in that engine room not understanding what made first one special.” “It wasn’t circumstance. It wasn’t the action. It was the moral core.”
1:08

Russell Crowe slams ‘GLADIATOR 2’ “I think the sequel is a really unfortunate example of even the people in that engine room not understanding what made first one special.” “It wasn’t circumstance. It wasn’t the action. It was the moral core.”

Emir Han

459,289 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Russell Crowe said that when he was first approached to play Maximus, the script was very poor. It was so bad the producers wouldn’t send it to him in case it put him off. Instead, they just asked him to meet Ridley Scott. Crowe did get his hands on the script though, and didn’t like it. He was going to say no but he was working on The Insider (1999) at the time and its director, Michael Mann, told Crowe he should meet with Scott anyway. Crowe did and said: “Ridley’s pitch was basically – ‘we’ve got a $100m budget. It’s ancient Rome. You’re playing a General. And you’re being directed by me.’” Crowe was suitably impressed, and took the part. Gladiator (2000)
0:36

Russell Crowe said that when he was first approached to play Maximus, the script was very poor. It was so bad the producers wouldn’t send it to him in case it put him off. Instead, they just asked him to meet Ridley Scott. Crowe did get his hands on the script though, and didn’t like it. He was going to say no but he was working on The Insider (1999) at the time and its director, Michael Mann, told Crowe he should meet with Scott anyway. Crowe did and said: “Ridley’s pitch was basically – ‘we’ve got a $100m budget. It’s ancient Rome. You’re playing a General. And you’re being directed by me.’” Crowe was suitably impressed, and took the part. Gladiator (2000)

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

572,537 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

It really needs to be said, again… EA really just needs to let Respawn make a TitanFall 3 It’s just needs • Campaign sequel to 2 • Multiplayer like 1 And don’t release between a COD and a Battlefield From XboxSeriesX
0:40

It really needs to be said, again… EA really just needs to let Respawn make a TitanFall 3 It’s just needs • Campaign sequel to 2 • Multiplayer like 1 And don’t release between a COD and a Battlefield From XboxSeriesX

Jamie Moran

69,402 просмотров • 1 год назад

If you’re a follower of me? Im divinly appointed? The whole earth has been given to me? I don’t have a home? This guy is dead serious and speaks like a messianic figure who is gaining followers daily. All I see here is another false prophet claiming to be the way to God—don’t fall for it! Christ warned us that many false prophets would rise and mislead many (Matt 24:11). Theres only ONE WAY to the Father and thats through Jesus Christ who is the way, the truth and the life (Jn 14:6). #JesusIsLord #JesusIsKing
0:39

If you’re a follower of me? Im divinly appointed? The whole earth has been given to me? I don’t have a home? This guy is dead serious and speaks like a messianic figure who is gaining followers daily. All I see here is another false prophet claiming to be the way to God—don’t fall for it! Christ warned us that many false prophets would rise and mislead many (Matt 24:11). Theres only ONE WAY to the Father and thats through Jesus Christ who is the way, the truth and the life (Jn 14:6). #JesusIsLord #JesusIsKing

Lion of Judah

44,705 просмотров • 1 год назад

Contrary to the “talking heads” who speak with such confidence but lack biblical intelligence, the Church didn’t replace Israel. The covenants aren’t fulfilled by the Church, they’re fulfilled when Christ returns to the earth. You can’t rewrite Scripture…but you can reveal you haven’t read it. There’s coming a day when Jesus will return—not symbolically, but physically—to establish His kingdom on the earth (Revelation 19). God made real covenants: • To Abraham — a land • To David — a throne • To OT & NT saints — a kingdom Those promises don’t disappear… they converge at the return of Jesus Christ. Don’t take my word for it. Open the Book. And like Tucker said at the end, “ummm, I mean it says it like on every page.” 😉
2:57

Contrary to the “talking heads” who speak with such confidence but lack biblical intelligence, the Church didn’t replace Israel. The covenants aren’t fulfilled by the Church, they’re fulfilled when Christ returns to the earth. You can’t rewrite Scripture…but you can reveal you haven’t read it. There’s coming a day when Jesus will return—not symbolically, but physically—to establish His kingdom on the earth (Revelation 19). God made real covenants: • To Abraham — a land • To David — a throne • To OT & NT saints — a kingdom Those promises don’t disappear… they converge at the return of Jesus Christ. Don’t take my word for it. Open the Book. And like Tucker said at the end, “ummm, I mean it says it like on every page.” 😉

Matthew Maher

36,304 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

In Gladiator, Russell Crowe says he refused to do a sex scene with Connie Nielson’s character “I just kept pushing back. I said, ‘This is a story about a man who’s avenging the death of his wife and his child. He can’t stop for sex along the way. It would ruin the journey.”
0:58

In Gladiator, Russell Crowe says he refused to do a sex scene with Connie Nielson’s character “I just kept pushing back. I said, ‘This is a story about a man who’s avenging the death of his wife and his child. He can’t stop for sex along the way. It would ruin the journey.”

Emir Han

1,572,908 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988) is nothing like the book it came from. And that’s a good thing. Even the author preferred the film so much that he wrote his sequel as a follow-up to the movie and dismissed the original novel as Jessica Rabbit’s bad dream.
2:19

Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988) is nothing like the book it came from. And that’s a good thing. Even the author preferred the film so much that he wrote his sequel as a follow-up to the movie and dismissed the original novel as Jessica Rabbit’s bad dream.

cinesthetic.

84,342 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Beshear: I think what J.D. Vance is forgetting is the commandment that thou shalt not worship false idols. Thankfully, he’s a better apologist than he is a peace negotiator, and all he’s doing is defending Donald Trump at all costs. This is a president who has attacked the pope multiple times, who is just trying to live out and speak the New Testament. He’s apologizing for a guy who is picturing himself as Jesus and then claiming, “No, I thought it was a doctor,” therefore violating “thou shalt not lie.” There is no point in the New Testament where Jesus ever talks about a just war. The pope is simply talking about a Christ who could have brought down fire on the Roman Empire and didn’t. The most powerful person who’s ever walked the face of the Earth—it could have been the prince of power, could have been king of everything, could have tried to justify violence—and never did. He could have been the prince of power, and he chose to be the prince of peace. And both J.D. Vance and Donald Trump could know that simply by reading the New Testament.
1:34

Beshear: I think what J.D. Vance is forgetting is the commandment that thou shalt not worship false idols. Thankfully, he’s a better apologist than he is a peace negotiator, and all he’s doing is defending Donald Trump at all costs. This is a president who has attacked the pope multiple times, who is just trying to live out and speak the New Testament. He’s apologizing for a guy who is picturing himself as Jesus and then claiming, “No, I thought it was a doctor,” therefore violating “thou shalt not lie.” There is no point in the New Testament where Jesus ever talks about a just war. The pope is simply talking about a Christ who could have brought down fire on the Roman Empire and didn’t. The most powerful person who’s ever walked the face of the Earth—it could have been the prince of power, could have been king of everything, could have tried to justify violence—and never did. He could have been the prince of power, and he chose to be the prince of peace. And both J.D. Vance and Donald Trump could know that simply by reading the New Testament.

Acyn

65,771 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"I feel incredibly grateful to have been part of a film like ‘War’. The sequel looks beautiful, more cinematic, and larger than life. Kudos to the team. I saw the #War2 trailer and it looks immaculate." – #VaaniKapoor | #HrithikRoshan 🔥
0:49

"I feel incredibly grateful to have been part of a film like ‘War’. The sequel looks beautiful, more cinematic, and larger than life. Kudos to the team. I saw the #War2 trailer and it looks immaculate." – #VaaniKapoor | #HrithikRoshan 🔥

Whynot Cinemas

80,083 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo (1984). This might be the fastest sequel ever, released only seven months after Breakin'. Breakdancers fight back against property developers who want to demolish a community centre. Shabba Doo and Boogaloo Shrimp are having none of it!
0:49

Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo (1984). This might be the fastest sequel ever, released only seven months after Breakin'. Breakdancers fight back against property developers who want to demolish a community centre. Shabba Doo and Boogaloo Shrimp are having none of it!

Pulp Librarian

28,486 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

While making Ridley Scott's 'Gladiator' (2000), Russell Crowe spent much of his time on set fighting the producers on various grounds, including why Maximus shouldn't have a s€x scene, why he had to die and, crucially, whether this "Spaniard" should actually have a Spanish accent. In an interview in 2006, he jokingly said about the studio demands for a s€x scene in the movie, ""I'm sorry boys, but it doesn't suit the character. We can't be avenging the death of the wife and child, and stop for a bit of nookie along the way. I'm sorry, it's not gonna happen." ("Russell Crowe GQ Cover Story, Andy Morris, 2010 & "Did I really say that? With Russell Crowe", Brenda McCormick, Irish Independent, 2009 ) P.S: On this day, 26 years ago, 'Gladiator' (2000) premiered in Los Angeles, USA.
1:34

Sensitive content

While making Ridley Scott's 'Gladiator' (2000), Russell Crowe spent much of his time on set fighting the producers on various grounds, including why Maximus shouldn't have a s€x scene, why he had to die and, crucially, whether this "Spaniard" should actually have a Spanish accent. In an interview in 2006, he jokingly said about the studio demands for a s€x scene in the movie, ""I'm sorry boys, but it doesn't suit the character. We can't be avenging the death of the wife and child, and stop for a bit of nookie along the way. I'm sorry, it's not gonna happen." ("Russell Crowe GQ Cover Story, Andy Morris, 2010 & "Did I really say that? With Russell Crowe", Brenda McCormick, Irish Independent, 2009 ) P.S: On this day, 26 years ago, 'Gladiator' (2000) premiered in Los Angeles, USA.

DepressedBergman

1,007,917 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

NEW: Rising carjacking and robbery attacks have Baltimore residents on edge "There was a gun pointed at me. I started fleeing. I could feel it on the back of my head when he shoved me, and I was on the ground," said Nick Webb. The suspects fled the scene. No arrests have been made
1:28

NEW: Rising carjacking and robbery attacks have Baltimore residents on edge "There was a gun pointed at me. I started fleeing. I could feel it on the back of my head when he shoved me, and I was on the ground," said Nick Webb. The suspects fled the scene. No arrests have been made

Unlimited L's

397,301 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is why I've ultimately never been bothered with the neck snap Hard call was made and Superman immediately felt pain/sadness, it's heartbreaking Exploring his trauma and how he would never want to kill again in a proper sequel would have been compelling, but they fumbled
1:43

This is why I've ultimately never been bothered with the neck snap Hard call was made and Superman immediately felt pain/sadness, it's heartbreaking Exploring his trauma and how he would never want to kill again in a proper sequel would have been compelling, but they fumbled

John | 🇵🇷

4,026,446 просмотров • 1 год назад

What is Diwali? Have you heard the story told by Brahminical mythology? Once upon a time, a demon rolled up the world like a mat and hid inside the ocean. Upon the gods' plea, Mahavishnu took the form of a boar, entered the ocean, killed him, retrieved the world, and spread it out. The spread-out Earth, that is, Bhumadevi, desired to mate with that boar. Consenting to the desire, Vishnu, in his boar form, mated with the Earth. As a result, the Earth became pregnant and gave birth to a child named Narakasura. That child tormented the Gods. For the sake of the gods, Vishnu started a war with Narakasura. Vishnu could not kill him. Vishnu's wife waged war against Narakasura and killed him. Because of this, the gods became happy. This happiness, that is, celebrating Narakasura's death, is what the Dravidian people, who are of Narakasura's race, must celebrate. This is the philosophy of the Diwali festival! These 10 things are what make Tamils celebrate Diwali, but what else? Does anyone know? Has anyone said? Let's investigate this. It seems that the Aryans who wrote this story didn't even have basic knowledge about the Earth. Is the Earth flat? Or round? Even if it were flat, could one person roll it up like a mat? From where would they stand to roll it? If rolled up, could it be lifted and carried to the ocean or on the head? From where would it be lifted? If hiding in the ocean, on what would the ocean have been resting at that time? Vishnu... why the necessity to take the form of a feces-eating boar? After killing the demon and spreading out the Earth, why would the Earth fall in love with the boar? Is the Earth in human form? Or animal form? Would mating between a human form and an animal form produce a human child? Then why the fight? Why the killing? Why should we be happy about this? Shouldn't the Tamil poets and scholars who celebrate Diwali think about these things at least a little? Narakasura's city is Mahishmati. It is on the banks of the Narmada River. Another city is called Pragjyotisha. It is near the Visham state in Bengal. These were ruled by Dravidian kings. In Bengal, who could the gods and demons have been? Without thinking about any of this, just because a Brahmin wrote it and says it, getting up in the middle of the night to bathe, wearing new clothes, bursting crackers, and when those Brahmins come and ask if we've had a Ganga bath, saying yes, bowing, giving money, and them taking the money, tucking it into their waist and leaving—what should we call this? Think! Think!! Brahmins... even if your teachers lack honor and intelligence, at least you should think. Why am I saying all this? It's because, in the time this story was written, the Brahmins, that is, the Aryans, must have been such barbarians. Why did we get cheated in that era, why did we fall into a lowly state? Every Tamil must think deeply about this... Thanks.. -Periyar Source :
3:43

What is Diwali? Have you heard the story told by Brahminical mythology? Once upon a time, a demon rolled up the world like a mat and hid inside the ocean. Upon the gods' plea, Mahavishnu took the form of a boar, entered the ocean, killed him, retrieved the world, and spread it out. The spread-out Earth, that is, Bhumadevi, desired to mate with that boar. Consenting to the desire, Vishnu, in his boar form, mated with the Earth. As a result, the Earth became pregnant and gave birth to a child named Narakasura. That child tormented the Gods. For the sake of the gods, Vishnu started a war with Narakasura. Vishnu could not kill him. Vishnu's wife waged war against Narakasura and killed him. Because of this, the gods became happy. This happiness, that is, celebrating Narakasura's death, is what the Dravidian people, who are of Narakasura's race, must celebrate. This is the philosophy of the Diwali festival! These 10 things are what make Tamils celebrate Diwali, but what else? Does anyone know? Has anyone said? Let's investigate this. It seems that the Aryans who wrote this story didn't even have basic knowledge about the Earth. Is the Earth flat? Or round? Even if it were flat, could one person roll it up like a mat? From where would they stand to roll it? If rolled up, could it be lifted and carried to the ocean or on the head? From where would it be lifted? If hiding in the ocean, on what would the ocean have been resting at that time? Vishnu... why the necessity to take the form of a feces-eating boar? After killing the demon and spreading out the Earth, why would the Earth fall in love with the boar? Is the Earth in human form? Or animal form? Would mating between a human form and an animal form produce a human child? Then why the fight? Why the killing? Why should we be happy about this? Shouldn't the Tamil poets and scholars who celebrate Diwali think about these things at least a little? Narakasura's city is Mahishmati. It is on the banks of the Narmada River. Another city is called Pragjyotisha. It is near the Visham state in Bengal. These were ruled by Dravidian kings. In Bengal, who could the gods and demons have been? Without thinking about any of this, just because a Brahmin wrote it and says it, getting up in the middle of the night to bathe, wearing new clothes, bursting crackers, and when those Brahmins come and ask if we've had a Ganga bath, saying yes, bowing, giving money, and them taking the money, tucking it into their waist and leaving—what should we call this? Think! Think!! Brahmins... even if your teachers lack honor and intelligence, at least you should think. Why am I saying all this? It's because, in the time this story was written, the Brahmins, that is, the Aryans, must have been such barbarians. Why did we get cheated in that era, why did we fall into a lowly state? Every Tamil must think deeply about this... Thanks.. -Periyar Source :

We Dravidians

272,911 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Russell Crowe on Gladiator 2: ‘They failed, and they failed because they didn’t understand what made the first film so successful: it had a moral core. Here’s the thing, most people want that. On the surface, they might go for entertainment, but if they’re going to love something and keep it with them forever, like that movie? …The love for that thing is because of its moral core. All guys want to be that man who can stay that strong, and all women want a man who can love them in that way.’
2:03

Russell Crowe on Gladiator 2: ‘They failed, and they failed because they didn’t understand what made the first film so successful: it had a moral core. Here’s the thing, most people want that. On the surface, they might go for entertainment, but if they’re going to love something and keep it with them forever, like that movie? …The love for that thing is because of its moral core. All guys want to be that man who can stay that strong, and all women want a man who can love them in that way.’

Gareth Harney

2,117,015 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

It seems like ‘the Lady’ is a virtual messenger sent from mother Gaia (Earth), to warn humans and try to influence our path towards a more positive outcome. Earth seems to have a built in self-defense system…it would be wise not to activate it 👊♥️
5:02

It seems like ‘the Lady’ is a virtual messenger sent from mother Gaia (Earth), to warn humans and try to influence our path towards a more positive outcome. Earth seems to have a built in self-defense system…it would be wise not to activate it 👊♥️

Jordan Crowder

30,812 просмотров • 1 год назад