Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

GM✨ Last-minute ballot title changes raise serious transparency concerns. An AG’s overnight shift from 'voter ID requirements' to 'prohibits citizens from voting' demands scrutiny How does such a radical re-framing happen without public oversight? ​Full story: Independent Voter #independentvoter

101,907 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 37

Фото профиля 𝙼𝚁. 𝚂𝙰𝙰𝙳𝙸 ⚔️
𝙼𝚁. 𝚂𝙰𝙰𝙳𝙸 ⚔️1 месяц назад

Let's F*cking Goo 🚀

Фото профиля Peblo Jr
Peblo Jr1 месяц назад

Yes g

Фото профиля Zahoor Ahmad | InterLink Trainee Ambass
Zahoor Ahmad | InterLink Trainee Ambass1 месяц назад

Good day to you mam Transparency matter especially when voting rights are involved.

Фото профиля Nick
Nick1 месяц назад

that ballot title flip is a huge red flag. wording like that changes everything for voters

Фото профиля MERCY_kuniⓂ️
MERCY_kuniⓂ️1 месяц назад

It's rigged already... the system is messed up

Фото профиля Daniel Ben
Daniel Ben1 месяц назад

Woo great one ☝️

Фото профиля Inspector | Privacy
Inspector | Privacy1 месяц назад

Someome has to be accountable for this radical change

Фото профиля sfoysal.skr
sfoysal.skr1 месяц назад

Changing the title after the signatures are already in is a real problem. Went from just describing the voter ID requirements to language that makes it sound like it’s stopping people from voting. Ballot titles should stay neutral, not get rewritten at the last minute.

Фото профиля CHRIS_XXX
CHRIS_XXX1 месяц назад

We are glad that you’re transparent about it

Фото профиля Emmydave
Emmydave1 месяц назад

Checking full story now

Фото профиля Somto
Somto1 месяц назад

transparency matters a lot when ballot language changes this drastically overnight.

Фото профиля ARSHI
ARSHI1 месяц назад

Transparency matters, wording changes shouldn’t mislead voters

Фото профиля muiz $RYS
muiz $RYS1 месяц назад

Gm gm king.... This life, in anything we do we should put transparency first .. coz it matters a lot

Фото профиля Not your regular Femi|🍊,💊
Not your regular Femi|🍊,💊1 месяц назад

This act demand questioning. The ploy is to enable rigging. The citizens should speak out and demand transparency.

Фото профиля Maniac
Maniac1 месяц назад

good morning homies

Фото профиля Ivan_eth
Ivan_eth1 месяц назад

Glad this transparency issue is getting attention

Фото профиля GoldenCelestial || $Wurk
GoldenCelestial || $Wurk1 месяц назад

Any election that's not built on transparency does not represent the Will of the people and it's bound to become a questionable act.

Фото профиля SLy💨😤🎮
SLy💨😤🎮1 месяц назад

The difference in wording does raise questions about how these descriptions get finalized and whether there's enough transparency in the process

Фото профиля DRAYCOMEBACK
DRAYCOMEBACK1 месяц назад

Citizen rights shouldn't be restricted

Фото профиля Cool Beans 🥚
Cool Beans 🥚1 месяц назад

GM Being pragmatic about this , transparency should be the top priority in any system

Фото профиля Ngozi Nwanze
Ngozi Nwanze1 месяц назад

Transparency is key.

Фото профиля Captain, Ade again?
Captain, Ade again?1 месяц назад

An interesting take

Фото профиля 𝔾𝔼𝕆ℝ𝔾𝔼 𝔾ℝ𝔼𝔸𝕋
𝔾𝔼𝕆ℝ𝔾𝔼 𝔾ℝ𝔼𝔸𝕋1 месяц назад

hi Peblo transparency is the key

Фото профиля LINDA 🌹
LINDA 🌹1 месяц назад

That's a shit ... Gm btw

Фото профиля Sakib khan
Sakib khan1 месяц назад

Gm bro

Фото профиля Ihsan
Ihsan1 месяц назад

How does oversight vanish overnight like this?

Фото профиля N.E.L.S.O.N🕷️
N.E.L.S.O.N🕷️1 месяц назад

Good morning peblo. Transparency is one thing we shouldn't joke with

Фото профиля Peblo Jr
Peblo Jr1 месяц назад

Good morning totally true

Фото профиля Mr. Spices ✨ ☠︎︎
Mr. Spices ✨ ☠︎︎1 месяц назад

"Last-minute ballot title changes" this alone is enough to deter the voters. It is definitely screaming something isn't right. Transparency means a lot

Фото профиля Itachi
Itachi1 месяц назад

Good morning Pablo, this is getting serious

Фото профиля Peblo Jr
Peblo Jr1 месяц назад

Good morning my friend

Фото профиля Goodman $LINGO
Goodman $LINGO1 месяц назад

Why can't they just be transparent? 😔

Фото профиля PHOENIX💎🐻
PHOENIX💎🐻1 месяц назад

They changed the whole meaning in one night and expect no one to notice? Ballot titles shouldn’t be a PR game.

Фото профиля Solomon000
Solomon0001 месяц назад

A very good and informative podcast that has been shared, and it is truly interesting.

Фото профиля Gazy Emmanuel
Gazy Emmanuel1 месяц назад

This last minute can change slot ooo

Фото профиля Oluwaseun💫
Oluwaseun💫1 месяц назад

We ain't giving the right to do so many things

Фото профиля Hermex
Hermex1 месяц назад

Gm Champ Transparency is the only quality that can make a good impression

Похожие видео

🚨BREAKING: CA Attorney General Rob Bonta Writes Biased Ballot Summary to STOP Voter ID from Becoming Law. 1.3 million Californians signed a petition to make Voter ID a requirement for all future state elections. In response, Bonta wrote a summary using prohibitive language to make it seem like the initiative would “strip citizens of the right to vote” instead of “securing all future elections.” What voters signed petitions for: “ESTABLISHES ADDITIONAL VOTER IDENTIFICATION AND CITIZENSHIP VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.” What Bonta is now forcing onto every ballot and voter guide: “PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION.” Same measure. Completely different meaning. He swapped “Requires ID” for “prohibits citizens from voting.” Then, “Provide the last four digits of your ID number” became “invalidates your mail ballot.” This is not a clarification. This is a deliberate attempt to scare low-information voters into voting ‘No’ on a measure that polls through the roof when described honestly. They know they can’t win the argument on the merits… so they’re poisoning the summary itself. The Yes on 39 team is already suing him over it. This is California election law in 2026: when the people force something onto the ballot that the ruling party hates, the Attorney General just changes the words. Tell me this isn’t textbook ballot language manipulation.

Max Bonilla

48,937 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: Trump’s FBI Declassified Documents Dump Exposes Michigan’s Dirty Voter Rolls Michigan’s dirty voter rolls were laid bare in the White House’s declassified documents dump that accompanied President Donald Trump’s national address on election security on Thursday. Among the documents was evidence that canvassers in Michigan submitted “8,000-10,000” faulty or falsified voter registrations ahead of the 2020 election. - Database checks returning no results - Signature mismatches - Payments made to canvassers to produce fake or faulty voter registrations - Social security numbers made up to fill out voter registration forms Michigan officials forwarded the 2020 investigation documents, supplied by an individual in Muskegon, to the FBI. In October 2020, the Michigan State Police initially disclosed their investigation into "irregularities in voter registration forms" within Muskegon. The Michigan attorney general’s office emphasized this "attempted fraud" was detected before Election Day, and consequently, these applicants were not incorporated into the state's voter lists. However, some Democrats were alarmed by investigators digging too far into the activities of radical canvassers. Democrat State Rep-Elect Abraham Aiyash even threatened the children of Wayne County Board of Canvassers member Monica Palmer over raising election concerns. "I want you to think about what this means for your kids, who probably go to [redacted]," he said. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has refused the Trump DOJ's demands for unredacted statewide voter rolls (including DOB, DL numbers, partial SSNs), providing only the public version. She cites state/federal privacy laws to protect against identity theft. The DOJ sued under NVRA, HAVA, and Civil Rights Act for list maintenance compliance. Benson has been a fierce opponent of voting integrity and election transparency efforts while in office. She is now running to be Michigan’s governor. The Department of Justice is in litigation with 30 states and the District of Columbia in a legal battle to clean up these states’ voter rolls. President Trump announced at his national address that there are at least 250,000 non-citizens on America’s voter rolls. Trump called on Congress to pass the SAVE America Act.

Benny Johnson

124,235 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

WHO IS ACTUALLY BUYING THIS? Serious question for Roop Raj: Have you actually done your due diligence on Michigan’s voter rolls & documented cases of noncitizens voting before accepting the premise that everything is fine? Because Michigan’s OWN Department of State confirmed 15 credible cases of apparent noncitizens voting in the 2024 election. Thirteen were referred for potential prosecution. Remember the Chinese national studying at U-M who allegedly registered, falsely claimed U.S. citizenship & CAST A BALLOT? That happened too. Does that prove widespread voter fraud? No. Does it prove the system is incapable of allowing an ineligible person to vote? Also no. And Michigan continues removing outdated registrations. Benson’s own administration says more than 1.1 MILLION have been removed since she took office. So when we’re told the voter rolls are “clean”, what exactly does that mean? Then there’s the DOJ. U.S. Department of Justice requested Michigan’s unredacted voter-registration database. Jocelyn Benson refused & provided a redacted version instead, arguing DOJ lacked the legal authority to demand the complete file and raising privacy concerns. But let’s be clear: we’re talking about the U.S. Department of Justice—not some random private organization asking Michigan to publish voters’ personal information online. The federal government already maintains enormous amounts of sensitive identifying information through agencies responsible for Social Security, immigration, passports, taxation & citizenship records. So the obvious question remains: If Michigan’s voter rolls are as clean & accurate as Benson says, why fight federal efforts to independently verify them? Nobody is asking for voters’ Social Security numbers or driver’s-license information to be posted publicly. We’re asking why the agencies responsible for enforcing federal election laws shouldn’t be able to lawfully cross-check the information necessary to determine whether everyone on Michigan’s voter rolls is actually eligible to be there. “Trust us” is not enough. That’s not transparency. And with documented cases of noncitizens getting through Michigan’s system & casting ballots, asking for independent verification isn’t unreasonable. It’s exactly what voters should demand.

Monica Yatooma

10,801 просмотров • 24 дней назад