正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Godlogic finally curses Orthodox, Roman Catholics and OO for not teaching reformation theology’s sola fide and sola gratia - condemning those denials as a “works based” false gospel under the ban of Gal. 1. Meanwhile, this grifting heretic literally sends people to messianic synagogues that circumcise people. No more...

91,914 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This masterful clip from Mark A. Garcia is a MUST WATCH for all Protestants who engage with Roman Catholics. “Roman Catholic is not ever to be confused with old, or patristic, or medieval, or even pre-Reformational. We need to be very careful to avoid falling prey to that mindset which suggests Roman Catholic is everything up to the Reformation, and Protestant is everything from the Reformation forward. That, in fact, gives away the whole argument to Roman Catholics in the very context at issue of the Reformation and post-Reformation assemblies, who really is teaching, professing, believing, and worshipping in terms of the one faith, one holy catholic and apostolic church, the one faith given through scripture to the church. Roman Catholicism, technically speaking, is an innovation which takes its historic point ofdeparture at the Council of Trent. Not until the 1540s and following, at the Council of Trent, when the church represented in that assembly definitively and publicly ruled out of its communion what we now, as a result, call Protestant churches, not until they had taken this ecclesiastical action, public and objective action, to rule out of the visible church, those we now call Protestants, was there even such a thing inmeaningful terms as a Roman Catholic Church? As a result of that action, you see, they not only created Protestantism as a side, as a byproduct, as a consequence of that action, theyalso created themselves as the Roman Catholic Church.” Credits: Greystone Theological Institute - Rescuing Mary From Rome

Mason Craig

52,194 次观看 • 10 个月前

Followers have asked me to comment on this video about Christian Nationalism from the perspective of a Catholic-Christian sympathetic to Orthodox Christianity. This X Post is exclusively & only about the pastors interviewed below, no one else. We should avoid the ideology of both Christian Nationalism interpreted by the far-right & radical feminism on the far-left. Men of the book (Christians, Muslims & the Jewish People) should walk together shoulder to shoulder in the name of synodality. We should support & promote traditional Christianity that is practiced voluntarily, patriarchy in the household, a true respect for women, and a respect for American culture. 1) Women must have and maintain the right to vote. We men should respect and defend this right, and we must protect the 19th Amendment. 2) Wives should voluntarily choose to submit to their husbands, and husbands should lead their wives and family. 3) We must have patriarchal households to maintain basic societal order, but not an exclusively patriarchal society. Two parties in a household who are partners will more likely than not constantly argue and eventually divorce. 4) Women who first serve their families as traditional homemakers absolutely deserve to be societal leaders, just as Our Lady reigns queen of heaven (Revelation 12:1-2). Christ turned to his disciple and said, "Woman, behold your son... Behold, your mother." (John 19:26-27). The Catholic and Orthodox Churches are both approximately 2,000 years old, tracing their origins back to the apostles. They tragically separated formally in 1054 CE. Catholics and Orthodox follow a tradition that includes not only Scripture but also Sacred Tradition and the authority of the Church. This tradition is seen as an essential guide for interpreting the Bible. Our 3rd wave feminist friends who attempt to claim the title of Christian while also practicing mysticism, Neo-Paganism, astrology, and worshipping the divine feminine often cite the doctrine of sola scriptura (Scripture alone). Separately, Reformed Protestant Christians also follow the doctrine of sola scriptura. Sola scriptura means they view the Bible as the sole infallible source of Christian teaching, which often leads to varied interpretations.(Anglicans and Episcopalians are slightly different in their view of tradition.) People interpret the Bible through their own lens, and some do so wrongly. This is why church authority, a Patriarch devoted to God alone, and his subordinate Patriarchs, are essential to guide us on our spiritual journey. The issue with Christian Nationalism is that its followers are typically Protestants who hold a co-equal authority with other Protestants: Sola Scriptura. For example, both Orthodox Christians and Catholics understand that wives must submit to their husbands because church tradition and its patriarchal leadership reinforce the Bible's teachings on the matter. The consequence is that Catholic nations often remain Catholic, and Orthodox nations remain Orthodox. Sola Scriptura gives radical feminism fertile ground for growth. When feminism takes root in Non-Denominational Protestantism, as seen in nations like Sweden, the UK, and Norway, men may feel they have no other choice but to turn to masculine, patriarchal religions such as Catholicism (Christianity) or Islam, just so they can find a wifeable bride that isn't subject to extremist feminism. For example, in Protestant Christianity, when a Protestant reads Ephesians 5:21, "Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ," progressive feminists might use this verse to argue that husbands should submit to wives. They often ignore the fact that Eve was made for and from Adam as a helpmate. Since Catholics and Orthodox have church authority to enforce the correct interpretation of Scripture, Protestant Christian Nationalists, who lack that church authority, are vulnerable to such misinterpretations. Catholics and Orthodox are not. Catholics and Orthodox have Patriarchs; our Protestant friends do not. We should promote Christian patriarchy exclusively in households, embrace classical liberalism, reject political extremism, say no to populism, and respect American exceptionalism. These are my opinions alone and are only directed towards the pastors in the below video, no one else and no other organization. The last thing a Protestant Calvinist pastor wants is a "New Crusade." His Holiness, the Bishop Of Rome, Patriarch of the West, is American. May we all walk together in the name of friendship & brotherhood. Have mercy on me, a sinner. See link below, for full video:

Theron Bassett

54,554 次观看 • 1 年前

Michael Wear's Center for Christianity and Public Life promotes liberation theology at its inaugural summit. "I hear some of you saying, 'Wait a minute. The gospel is about our souls being saved.' Yes, that, AND what Jesus says in Luke 4. 'That the spirit of the Lord is upon me, for He hath anointed me to preach the good news to the poor.' Dot dot dot. 'And to set at liberty those who are captive.' Not just spiritually captive, my friends, but physically captive. Those who have borne the weight of oppression both here and abroad need to hear that there's good news not just in some sweet by and by but right here, right now. That God calls us to beloved community and God calls us to experience freedom and to experience hope." Speaker is CJ Rhodes of Mt. Helm Baptist Church in Jackson, Mississippi, who once served as the Public Theologian-In-Residence for the "And Campaign." I have said many times that liberation theology makes the same error as Bethel and faith healer hucksters. Some charismatics claim that the gospel is not complete without signs and wonders, particularly in regard to physical healing. And while SOME people will receive miraculous healing in this life, to the glory of God, not ALL who receive the gospel also receive miraculous healing. Therefore, if you can have the full gospel without miraculous healing, then miraculous healing is not a necessary element of the gospel. In the same way, SOME people will receive socioeconomic liberation or political victories in this life, to the glory of God, but not ALL who receive the gospel also receive these things. Therefore, if you can have the full gospel without physical liberation, then physical liberation (in this life, not in the eschaton), is not a necessary element of the gospel. It is a blessing that God may bestow on some of his people in some particular contexts, but it is not the gospel (which is the forgiveness of sins, promise of future resurrection and eternal life, the current indwelling of the Holy Spirit and fellowship of the church, accomplished by Jesus's perfect life, his work on the cross, and his victory over the grave-see 1 Corinthians 15). Even in the course of Jesus's earthly ministry, we can see the "physical" interpretation of Luke 4 is not universal. -He did not free John from prison or prevent his martyrdom (Matthew 14:1-12...plus in Matthew 11:2-6, he repeats the Luke 4/Isaiah 61 language TO JOHN WHILE HE IS IN PRISON). -He commended a Roman centurion, of the oppressor class, for having greater faith than his countrymen who were oppressed by Rome (Matthew 8:5-13). -He instructed his disciples to pay a tax even if it was corrupt and selectively enforced (Matthew 17:24-27). And there is the theme throughout the rest of the NT that we suffer now for a better life in eternity (Hebrews 11, 2 Corinthians 4:7-18) and to be patient about receiving this reward (1 Peter 1:3-9, James 5:7-8). The Liberation Gospel is one of the only ways that political leftism and Christianity can be syncretized. The Coneists are trying to level up by claiming they are "conservative," i.e. not denying the deity of Christ. But like the Judaizers, you can take orthodox theology and make it cursed by ADDING something to the true gospel and demanding that addition as a requirement for inclusion in the body of Christ.

Woke Preacher Clips

13,263 次观看 • 1 年前

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,860 次观看 • 2 年前