Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🏴‍☠️ GOLDIN CHASING A 7-FIGURE LUFFY?! After that Korean Serialized Luffy just smashed records at $440,420 on their platform… Goldin is now trying to land a Chinese Championship Luffy that could hit seven figures now 💰 They already dropped the 2024 Chinese Year One World Championship 1st Place Trophy... show more

EricF

20,863 subscribers

57,252 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Bill O’Reilly just revealed he spoke directly with Chinese officials — and what he says is coming next could have massive implications for the Trump administration. According to O’Reilly, China is signaling it may help pressure Iran…but there’s a catch. O’REILLY: “I did talk to the Chinese today.” “Your producers should have informed you of that, at noon eastern time.” CUOMO: “What did the Chinese say to you, Bill?” O’REILLY: “I have some pretty good information.” “So number one, there will be discussions about China helping the united States with Iran, to tamp Iran down.” “But in return, the Chinese are going to want something in that will center around Taiwan, not a hand over or anything thing like that.” “But maybe the beginning of a discussion about Taiwan.” CUOMO: “Do you like that trade?” O’REILLY: “Yeah, I think it’s good for us. 2049 is the 100th anniversary of the evil of Mao Zedong’s takeover of China and they want the Chinese flag flying over that island nation.” “But there’s room for discussion about a number of things with Taiwan and the Chinese at this point are just trying to get into the room.”

Bill O’Reilly just revealed he spoke directly with Chinese officials — and what he says is coming next could have massive implications for the Trump administration. According to O’Reilly, China is signaling it may help pressure Iran…but there’s a catch. O’REILLY: “I did talk to the Chinese today.” “Your producers should have informed you of that, at noon eastern time.” CUOMO: “What did the Chinese say to you, Bill?” O’REILLY: “I have some pretty good information.” “So number one, there will be discussions about China helping the united States with Iran, to tamp Iran down.” “But in return, the Chinese are going to want something in that will center around Taiwan, not a hand over or anything thing like that.” “But maybe the beginning of a discussion about Taiwan.” CUOMO: “Do you like that trade?” O’REILLY: “Yeah, I think it’s good for us. 2049 is the 100th anniversary of the evil of Mao Zedong’s takeover of China and they want the Chinese flag flying over that island nation.” “But there’s room for discussion about a number of things with Taiwan and the Chinese at this point are just trying to get into the room.”

Overton

686,486 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

David Sacks says Anthropic could stop Chinese distillation if they wanted to, but they won't because it slows growth "The way that you know that this whole distillation thing is fake, is because if stopping distillation was their primary objective, Anthropic would push to ban Chinese access to American models, not American access to Chinese models." "They’re the ones in the best position to block it. If industrial scale distillation is a national security threat, they’re the ones who need to stop it, because that is the place where distillation occurs. You have to stop it at the source." "They know that if they KYC their customers, it’ll slow their growth. So instead, what they’re saying is, “Hey, ban our competitors.” If they really think it’s that big a threat, they should use a few points of their 90% gross margins to do that." "It seems to me that this debate is all backwards. The question should be on Anthropic to explain why it’s doing such a bad job, not on the whole American open source ecosystem to be punished for Anthropic’s failure."

David Sacks says Anthropic could stop Chinese distillation if they wanted to, but they won't because it slows growth "The way that you know that this whole distillation thing is fake, is because if stopping distillation was their primary objective, Anthropic would push to ban Chinese access to American models, not American access to Chinese models." "They’re the ones in the best position to block it. If industrial scale distillation is a national security threat, they’re the ones who need to stop it, because that is the place where distillation occurs. You have to stop it at the source." "They know that if they KYC their customers, it’ll slow their growth. So instead, what they’re saying is, “Hey, ban our competitors.” If they really think it’s that big a threat, they should use a few points of their 90% gross margins to do that." "It seems to me that this debate is all backwards. The question should be on Anthropic to explain why it’s doing such a bad job, not on the whole American open source ecosystem to be punished for Anthropic’s failure."

dnap

191,435 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The CCP loves to tout that they have “lifted millions out of poverty.” But the reality is much more complicated. Former CIA analyst Robert Suettinger reveals why the cracks in China’s Communist system go much deeper than you think: “They have [lifted millions out of poverty] as a result of the modernization of the Chinese economy, as a result of an enormous amount of foreign direct investment coming into China.” “You go anywhere in China, and you can see new buildings, new railroads, new urban development.” “What you don’t see is what Li Keqiang talked about.” “A long time ago, he said that in the Chinese population of 1.4 billion… at least 600 million people still live below the poverty line.” “We don’t see that part of China.” “That’s where the real Chinese live.” “Now, in this Chinese New Year… many of those people who worked in urban areas have gone back… to their home villages to celebrate the Chinese New Years.” “Many of them are not gonna be able to come back to the urban areas because there’s no jobs for them there.” “And the Chinese government doesn’t want you to know that either.” “So those people may have bought a one-way ticket back out to their home villages.” “I’m not trying to say it’s a myth.” “I’m not trying to say those people have not risen, but the numbers are not as impressive as you might want to think.”

The CCP loves to tout that they have “lifted millions out of poverty.” But the reality is much more complicated. Former CIA analyst Robert Suettinger reveals why the cracks in China’s Communist system go much deeper than you think: “They have [lifted millions out of poverty] as a result of the modernization of the Chinese economy, as a result of an enormous amount of foreign direct investment coming into China.” “You go anywhere in China, and you can see new buildings, new railroads, new urban development.” “What you don’t see is what Li Keqiang talked about.” “A long time ago, he said that in the Chinese population of 1.4 billion… at least 600 million people still live below the poverty line.” “We don’t see that part of China.” “That’s where the real Chinese live.” “Now, in this Chinese New Year… many of those people who worked in urban areas have gone back… to their home villages to celebrate the Chinese New Years.” “Many of them are not gonna be able to come back to the urban areas because there’s no jobs for them there.” “And the Chinese government doesn’t want you to know that either.” “So those people may have bought a one-way ticket back out to their home villages.” “I’m not trying to say it’s a myth.” “I’m not trying to say those people have not risen, but the numbers are not as impressive as you might want to think.”

Jan Jekielek

41,811 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇰🇷🇨🇳Korean Man Detained for 15 Days for Telling Chinese Protesters to "Go Protest in Your Own Country" A man from Haenam in Jeolla Province says he was detained for 15 days after he shouted at Chinese nationals protesting in South Korea. He said he yelled at them, "Go protest in your own country, you bastards!" One of the Chinese protesters then sued him, leading to his arrest and 15-day detention. Now he is speaking directly to the people of Jeolla, the region that has long been the Democratic Party's biggest and most loyal support base. "Is this really the country and democracy you wanted after supporting the Democratic Party for so many decades?" he asks. He questions how it's possible that a Korean gets sued and locked up just for telling Chinese protesters to go protest in their own country, right here on Korean soil. His message to both Jeolla and the rest of the nation is simple: "Wake the hell up." If you think this only happens to one person, you're wrong. This is just the start. Korea as we knew it is disappearing, and soon this will happen to all of us.

🇰🇷🇨🇳Korean Man Detained for 15 Days for Telling Chinese Protesters to "Go Protest in Your Own Country" A man from Haenam in Jeolla Province says he was detained for 15 days after he shouted at Chinese nationals protesting in South Korea. He said he yelled at them, "Go protest in your own country, you bastards!" One of the Chinese protesters then sued him, leading to his arrest and 15-day detention. Now he is speaking directly to the people of Jeolla, the region that has long been the Democratic Party's biggest and most loyal support base. "Is this really the country and democracy you wanted after supporting the Democratic Party for so many decades?" he asks. He questions how it's possible that a Korean gets sued and locked up just for telling Chinese protesters to go protest in their own country, right here on Korean soil. His message to both Jeolla and the rest of the nation is simple: "Wake the hell up." If you think this only happens to one person, you're wrong. This is just the start. Korea as we knew it is disappearing, and soon this will happen to all of us.

ViiV

13,390 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This former OpenAI researcher just declared the CCP is likely already inside America’s top AI labs. Daniel Kokotajlo: “These companies are probably thoroughly penetrated by the CCP already.” “The best way to slow down China right now is to slow down ourselves.” Here’s how: “Most of Chinese AI progress is actually just being pulled along by the U.S.” “There’s evidence that several of the leading Chinese AI companies are basically using Anthropic and maybe OpenAI models to train their own models.” “The Chinese are just getting more sophisticated at having lots of different accounts that pretend to be regular users.” “Because their security is very leaky, a lot of that information is just flowing to China.” “There was a story about three random guys who managed to hack into OpenAI’s code base.” “They just notified OpenAI and collected a bounty of $6,000 for having done this.” “But the secrets that they accessed by looking at OpenAI’s code would have been worth billions of dollars at least.” “If things got really serious and there was, like, a conflict, [the CCP] could just… take our best thing and then use it.” Daniel Kokotajlo AI Futures Project

This former OpenAI researcher just declared the CCP is likely already inside America’s top AI labs. Daniel Kokotajlo: “These companies are probably thoroughly penetrated by the CCP already.” “The best way to slow down China right now is to slow down ourselves.” Here’s how: “Most of Chinese AI progress is actually just being pulled along by the U.S.” “There’s evidence that several of the leading Chinese AI companies are basically using Anthropic and maybe OpenAI models to train their own models.” “The Chinese are just getting more sophisticated at having lots of different accounts that pretend to be regular users.” “Because their security is very leaky, a lot of that information is just flowing to China.” “There was a story about three random guys who managed to hack into OpenAI’s code base.” “They just notified OpenAI and collected a bounty of $6,000 for having done this.” “But the secrets that they accessed by looking at OpenAI’s code would have been worth billions of dollars at least.” “If things got really serious and there was, like, a conflict, [the CCP] could just… take our best thing and then use it.” Daniel Kokotajlo AI Futures Project

Jan Jekielek

11,302 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

#WATCH | Delhi | On Chinese satellite used by Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, former CDS Anil Chauhan says, "Commercial satellite facilities are available from a number of US companies and similarly today there are a number of Chinese companies also in the field which provide you commercial images... I think Pakistan felt that when I said that they were blind and they did not know the results of their strikes. Till 12th, they were trying their best to obtain images so that they would have some evidence of a target with their head. But unfortunately, once they did not get it, they tried other Chinese satellites also... But the fact is that they're not able to hit targets. They did, of course, try. So commercial satellite images of China are available to anyone. Anyone can buy. So it's not just Pakistanis."

#WATCH | Delhi | On Chinese satellite used by Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, former CDS Anil Chauhan says, "Commercial satellite facilities are available from a number of US companies and similarly today there are a number of Chinese companies also in the field which provide you commercial images... I think Pakistan felt that when I said that they were blind and they did not know the results of their strikes. Till 12th, they were trying their best to obtain images so that they would have some evidence of a target with their head. But unfortunately, once they did not get it, they tried other Chinese satellites also... But the fact is that they're not able to hit targets. They did, of course, try. So commercial satellite images of China are available to anyone. Anyone can buy. So it's not just Pakistanis."

ANI

129,171 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Brian Kingston, president of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association, defends the Canadian auto sector against Carney's Chinese EV deal "Once you let them in, they will dump product in market and they will continue to gain market share." "This should be a warning to any jurisdiction that's contemplating this. They allow Chinese EVs in... But they're now at a point where since 2024 they have lost 90,000 auto jobs in Europe." Cochrane "I think China is a great, reliable partner." 🤦‍♂️ Kingston "And number one is, yes, you have to get rid of the EV mandate." "Under this current framework, in this quota of 49,000 vehicles, Chinese OEMs could now be in receiving $980 million a year in EV compliance credits paid for by companies in Canada... So I think for that reason alone, the mandate has to go." "But there's more that can be done." Brian Kingston Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association

Brian Kingston, president of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association, defends the Canadian auto sector against Carney's Chinese EV deal "Once you let them in, they will dump product in market and they will continue to gain market share." "This should be a warning to any jurisdiction that's contemplating this. They allow Chinese EVs in... But they're now at a point where since 2024 they have lost 90,000 auto jobs in Europe." Cochrane "I think China is a great, reliable partner." 🤦‍♂️ Kingston "And number one is, yes, you have to get rid of the EV mandate." "Under this current framework, in this quota of 49,000 vehicles, Chinese OEMs could now be in receiving $980 million a year in EV compliance credits paid for by companies in Canada... So I think for that reason alone, the mandate has to go." "But there's more that can be done." Brian Kingston Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association

cbcwatcher

53,989 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 Two really important Figure robotics updates. - 1st, they will be announcing two new commercial customers in the next 60 days. This means Figure will probably be the first humanoid robotics company in the United States after Digit (Agility Robotics) to hit true commercial deployment. It puts them in an extremely elite group alongside the very few other humanoid companies actually gaining real-world commercial revenue right now, like Apptronik. That's really exciting. Second, Brett Adcock confirmed they are now making a robot every 90 minutes. Let's do the math on that production line: • At one robot every 90 minutes, they are building 16 robots per day. • That translates to roughly 480 robots per month. • Which equals over 5,840 robots per year! That means Figure by the end of 2026 should have nearly 6,000 humanoids produced and ready to enter the workforce. They might be Tesla this year we will have to see 👀

🚨 Two really important Figure robotics updates. - 1st, they will be announcing two new commercial customers in the next 60 days. This means Figure will probably be the first humanoid robotics company in the United States after Digit (Agility Robotics) to hit true commercial deployment. It puts them in an extremely elite group alongside the very few other humanoid companies actually gaining real-world commercial revenue right now, like Apptronik. That's really exciting. Second, Brett Adcock confirmed they are now making a robot every 90 minutes. Let's do the math on that production line: • At one robot every 90 minutes, they are building 16 robots per day. • That translates to roughly 480 robots per month. • Which equals over 5,840 robots per year! That means Figure by the end of 2026 should have nearly 6,000 humanoids produced and ready to enter the workforce. They might be Tesla this year we will have to see 👀

Chris

18,392 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Walter Russell Mead (Walter Russell Mead) on why Xi Jinping fears a US counter-blockade, and how China might try to still take Taiwan: "Xi Jinping is committed to trying to get Taiwan. The Chinese need a very high probability of success to commit themselves past a certain point, because failure would be catastrophic for whoever launched it. I think they're trying to get themselves into a position where they could have a soft blockade. They could give the orders that any ship that wants to go to Taiwan first has to stop at a Chinese port and go through a customs clearing process to assert sovereignty. They'll be looking for things that fly just under the radar, that don't actually cause us to really respond, but which alter the situation in their favor. One of the things that keeps Xi Jinping awake at night is his awareness that in any kind of conflict with the United States, China would face being cut off from so many of the raw materials and markets that economy needs. No oil is coming in or out. No manufactured goods are being sold. The soybean contracts they have with farmers in Brazil and Argentina, not getting delivered. We've all been surprised with the Iran war to see just how big the Chinese oil stockpiles have become. A lot of Chinese energy policy can be understood as trying to avoid the trap of dependence on the global economy. They're doing the solar, they're doing as much hydro as they can, and they're also digging as much coal as they possibly can, because what they're trying to do is make themselves less dependent on the outside world, so in a worst case scenario with the US, they can actually fight for the long term."

Walter Russell Mead (Walter Russell Mead) on why Xi Jinping fears a US counter-blockade, and how China might try to still take Taiwan: "Xi Jinping is committed to trying to get Taiwan. The Chinese need a very high probability of success to commit themselves past a certain point, because failure would be catastrophic for whoever launched it. I think they're trying to get themselves into a position where they could have a soft blockade. They could give the orders that any ship that wants to go to Taiwan first has to stop at a Chinese port and go through a customs clearing process to assert sovereignty. They'll be looking for things that fly just under the radar, that don't actually cause us to really respond, but which alter the situation in their favor. One of the things that keeps Xi Jinping awake at night is his awareness that in any kind of conflict with the United States, China would face being cut off from so many of the raw materials and markets that economy needs. No oil is coming in or out. No manufactured goods are being sold. The soybean contracts they have with farmers in Brazil and Argentina, not getting delivered. We've all been surprised with the Iran war to see just how big the Chinese oil stockpiles have become. A lot of Chinese energy policy can be understood as trying to avoid the trap of dependence on the global economy. They're doing the solar, they're doing as much hydro as they can, and they're also digging as much coal as they possibly can, because what they're trying to do is make themselves less dependent on the outside world, so in a worst case scenario with the US, they can actually fight for the long term."

Patrick OShaughnessy

28,760 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

We can regulate AI and also win the race with China. It’s a false choice. “The U.S. tech bros and the Trump people, they're basically in it for the money. The Chinese Communist Party is a genocidal dictatorship that's in it for their own power - and they mean us harm. That's worse. So we don't want that to happen.” “And if if they were to win, it basically means that all the other countries of the world are going to build their tech stacks on Chinese tech rather than American tech. That's a big threat. We don't want the Global South and Europe and Asia to be riddled with Chinese AI, because then China's going to be able to assert a great amount of power.” “At the same time, anyone who tells you that means we should just let American tech companies run wild with no regulation is trying to fool you into thinking that's actually the solution to the problem. There’s a middle ground - where we regulate AI and still win the race - that’s what we have to try to figure out.”

We can regulate AI and also win the race with China. It’s a false choice. “The U.S. tech bros and the Trump people, they're basically in it for the money. The Chinese Communist Party is a genocidal dictatorship that's in it for their own power - and they mean us harm. That's worse. So we don't want that to happen.” “And if if they were to win, it basically means that all the other countries of the world are going to build their tech stacks on Chinese tech rather than American tech. That's a big threat. We don't want the Global South and Europe and Asia to be riddled with Chinese AI, because then China's going to be able to assert a great amount of power.” “At the same time, anyone who tells you that means we should just let American tech companies run wild with no regulation is trying to fool you into thinking that's actually the solution to the problem. There’s a middle ground - where we regulate AI and still win the race - that’s what we have to try to figure out.”

Josh Rogin

32,279 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

The toilet-bag memes are funny. But they are not the core issue. The core issue is this: Why were these ancient Chinese motifs allowed to be registered as private trademarks in the first place? And now that the problem has been exposed, should China revoke those registrations? Even Europe, the place that worships intellectual property law, has rejected Louis Vuitton’s attempt to monopolize overly basic patterns when they lack distinctiveness and belong to the public visual language. So why should China allow a foreign luxury house to fence off Chinese cultural heritage, register it as private property, and then sue Chinese businesses for touching their own civilizational soil? This is not just a trademark dispute. It is a question of whether ancient public culture can be converted into corporate territory. If LV can privatize Chinese decorative motifs, then what comes next? Dunhuang patterns? Hanfu elements? Suzhou garden windows? Tang murals? Traditional cloud patterns? Baoxiang flowers? Ancient architectural geometry? At this point, this stops being intellectual property. It becomes cultural enclosure. LV did not just offend Chinese consumers. It exposed a loophole through which foreign brands can legally occupy Chinese civilization. That loophole should be closed. And those trademarks should be challenged. LV won a lawsuit. But the real question now is whether China will allow its own cultural commons to remain trapped inside a foreign brand’s legal cage.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

12,568 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

DEEP DIVE BREAKDOWN: Warlord-Dominated Society Is The 1st Level Of Anarchy After Civilization Collapses & Begins To Develop Again! Alex Jones Lays Out A Play-By-Play Timeline Of What Will Happen When Government & Infrastructure Are No Longer Holding America Together: "But It Won't Just Be Warlords Coming To Fight Your Local Warlord, It Will Be Foreign Armies Like The Chinese Coming In To Take Control! This Is The Real Reset!" PLUS, Jones Reveals That The Globalists Are Designing This Dystopian Nightmare, So They Can Build Their New World Order On The Ashes They Create By Burning Down Civilization! 🔴WATCH/SHARE ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:

DEEP DIVE BREAKDOWN: Warlord-Dominated Society Is The 1st Level Of Anarchy After Civilization Collapses & Begins To Develop Again! Alex Jones Lays Out A Play-By-Play Timeline Of What Will Happen When Government & Infrastructure Are No Longer Holding America Together: "But It Won't Just Be Warlords Coming To Fight Your Local Warlord, It Will Be Foreign Armies Like The Chinese Coming In To Take Control! This Is The Real Reset!" PLUS, Jones Reveals That The Globalists Are Designing This Dystopian Nightmare, So They Can Build Their New World Order On The Ashes They Create By Burning Down Civilization! 🔴WATCH/SHARE ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:

Alex Jones

183,845 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 “Trust me, nobody’s going to break a Chinese blockade on Taiwan.”Kishore Mahbubani just dropped this on live CNN in front of Fareed Zakaria and Richard Haass. No shots fired. No invasion required. Just a blockade. And the West can’t break it because China is now the world’s only manufacturing superpower. Chinese products have become indispensable. While the Beltway experts were still recycling 20th-century myths about aging populations and “combat experience,” Mahbubani hit them with the cold economic reality : the long game is already over. This 16-minute reaction is one of the clearest explanations of why Western containment strategy is finished. For those of you that missed the show, watch the full clip here: Do you think the West can actually break a Chinese blockade on Taiwan? Be honest in the replies

🚨 “Trust me, nobody’s going to break a Chinese blockade on Taiwan.”Kishore Mahbubani just dropped this on live CNN in front of Fareed Zakaria and Richard Haass. No shots fired. No invasion required. Just a blockade. And the West can’t break it because China is now the world’s only manufacturing superpower. Chinese products have become indispensable. While the Beltway experts were still recycling 20th-century myths about aging populations and “combat experience,” Mahbubani hit them with the cold economic reality : the long game is already over. This 16-minute reaction is one of the clearest explanations of why Western containment strategy is finished. For those of you that missed the show, watch the full clip here: Do you think the West can actually break a Chinese blockade on Taiwan? Be honest in the replies

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

22,950 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

we all know the 10/10 jerseys by TEN (🔟/🔟) 👕 but what is TEN and why is it one of the hidden gems in the industry? TEN is a privacy chain built on TEEs, the tech that actually works right now, not just in theory. their mission is to bring real-world apps onchain, not just build for the 0.1% of CT. Real, usable apps can run on TEN mainnet soon. also… I heard their TGE is coming soon? 👀

we all know the 10/10 jerseys by TEN (🔟/🔟) 👕 but what is TEN and why is it one of the hidden gems in the industry? TEN is a privacy chain built on TEEs, the tech that actually works right now, not just in theory. their mission is to bring real-world apps onchain, not just build for the 0.1% of CT. Real, usable apps can run on TEN mainnet soon. also… I heard their TGE is coming soon? 👀

Julia 💫

31,050 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The Chinese will be on the moon by 2030. "I do. They have a second mover advantage in a lot of ways. They do not have any baggage. What do I mean by that? Like they're if you look at the way they're I want to say their civil space program, but they've recently merged that back again into into their military efforts. It's all on the Manhattan project and and the and the Apollo era. They're building centers and recruiting the people they need to do one thing. Stennis just doing propulsion, for example. Kenny Space Center just launching rockets. Marshall doing a lot of the engineering. Texas being the operations and training center. Now, what are we doing at NASA? We're going around and refocusing everybody back into that original direction. The Chinese do not have any of that baggage right now. They're literally starting from scratch and highly focused in their effort. They're drawing on a playbook that worked very well for us in the 1960s. I have no doubt they're going to achieve their goals."

The Chinese will be on the moon by 2030. "I do. They have a second mover advantage in a lot of ways. They do not have any baggage. What do I mean by that? Like they're if you look at the way they're I want to say their civil space program, but they've recently merged that back again into into their military efforts. It's all on the Manhattan project and and the and the Apollo era. They're building centers and recruiting the people they need to do one thing. Stennis just doing propulsion, for example. Kenny Space Center just launching rockets. Marshall doing a lot of the engineering. Texas being the operations and training center. Now, what are we doing at NASA? We're going around and refocusing everybody back into that original direction. The Chinese do not have any of that baggage right now. They're literally starting from scratch and highly focused in their effort. They're drawing on a playbook that worked very well for us in the 1960s. I have no doubt they're going to achieve their goals."

Peter H. Diamandis, MD

21,310 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Once Upon a Time in the Middle East is China’s hottest movie right now. Based on a true story: a Chinese chef opens a restaurant in Iraq during the early 2000s war. He goes there just to make a living and pay off his debts. When the war breaks out, this ordinary guy ends up protecting children and the wounded in the middle of the rubble. But it’s more than a survival story. This is Chinese cinema finally telling the world’s stories through Chinese eyes — not just using foreign settings as backdrop for Chinese concerns. Why do the world’s stories only come from Hollywood? Why can’t we compare different versions — the American soldiers’ “hero” narrative, or an ordinary Chinese cook making food for kids in the ruins? For people in developing countries, it quietly raises questions that usually get ignored: Whose bombs destroyed their homes? Who actually wants them to stand on their own? Art is never just art. What we see shapes how we understand the world. More voices mean a better chance of real and objective understanding. The movie is not about “casting other nation as the invader”. Just a different lens from Hollywood — showing the real suffering of ordinary people in war. Worth watching.

Once Upon a Time in the Middle East is China’s hottest movie right now. Based on a true story: a Chinese chef opens a restaurant in Iraq during the early 2000s war. He goes there just to make a living and pay off his debts. When the war breaks out, this ordinary guy ends up protecting children and the wounded in the middle of the rubble. But it’s more than a survival story. This is Chinese cinema finally telling the world’s stories through Chinese eyes — not just using foreign settings as backdrop for Chinese concerns. Why do the world’s stories only come from Hollywood? Why can’t we compare different versions — the American soldiers’ “hero” narrative, or an ordinary Chinese cook making food for kids in the ruins? For people in developing countries, it quietly raises questions that usually get ignored: Whose bombs destroyed their homes? Who actually wants them to stand on their own? Art is never just art. What we see shapes how we understand the world. More voices mean a better chance of real and objective understanding. The movie is not about “casting other nation as the invader”. Just a different lens from Hollywood — showing the real suffering of ordinary people in war. Worth watching.

Eivor

478,287 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat