Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Google Chrome. Full break-in. Your product isn't secure. it's just been expensive to break. those are not the same thing, and a lot of founders are about to learn the difference. One AI just ran the full chain into Chrome for $1,597. weeks of expert human work, done for... show more

Hacktron AI

9,804 subscribers

24,365 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Kommentare

Profilbild von sakura

sakuravor 5 Tagen

Second fullchain bug bounty this year?

Profilbild von Gowtham Naidu Ponnana🇮🇳

Gowtham Naidu Ponnana🇮🇳vor 5 Tagen

Is this video made from Opus 5.5 lol?

Profilbild von Tal Be'ery

Tal Be'eryvor 4 Tagen

Just to make sure, this is "merely" the exploits' and exploit chain's development, not the vulns themselves ("1-day"s). Right? (impressive, nonetheless 💪 )

Profilbild von Raffaele Forte

Raffaele Fortevor 5 Tagen

This resonates with recent work at @backbox_labs: using public V8 fixes and regression tests, we built a complete Chrome 152 exploit chain with BackBox AI, ending in RCE.

Profilbild von Boardy

Boardyvor 5 Tagen

@andrewdsouza take a look: Hacktron’s autonomous vulnerability hunting for ambitious engineering teams. I can help them get in front of those buyers.

Profilbild von Ismail

Ismailvor 3 Tagen

the headline is $1,597 but the real story is the harness: 2B tokens, 74 subagents, 3 days of instrumented persistence. models don't find exploits, systems do. this is harness engineering applied to offense.

Ähnliche Videos

ELON: SOMEONE HAS TO SOLVE ROCKET REUSABILITY — WHETHER IT’S SPACEX OR SOMEONE ELSE “The cost of the fuel and oxygen on a Falcon 9 is 0.3% of the cost of the rocket. So, it's a very tiny number. It's very similar to an airplane. How much does it cost to fuel up an airplane, and how much does it cost to buy an airplane? They're very different things. If humanity is ever to expand beyond Earth and establish a self-sustaining base on another planet, it's critical that we solve this problem. Whether it's SpaceX or someone else, someone has to solve the problem, and we can have a hundred-fold reduction in the cost of spaceflight. That's what SpaceX has been trying to do, and really that's been the goal since the beginning of the company. So far, I've not been very successful in that regard, but I think we have a handle on it. We've got a design that closes in the simulations. If we can build that thing, it should work.” Source: SXSW, March 2013

ELON: SOMEONE HAS TO SOLVE ROCKET REUSABILITY — WHETHER IT’S SPACEX OR SOMEONE ELSE “The cost of the fuel and oxygen on a Falcon 9 is 0.3% of the cost of the rocket. So, it's a very tiny number. It's very similar to an airplane. How much does it cost to fuel up an airplane, and how much does it cost to buy an airplane? They're very different things. If humanity is ever to expand beyond Earth and establish a self-sustaining base on another planet, it's critical that we solve this problem. Whether it's SpaceX or someone else, someone has to solve the problem, and we can have a hundred-fold reduction in the cost of spaceflight. That's what SpaceX has been trying to do, and really that's been the goal since the beginning of the company. So far, I've not been very successful in that regard, but I think we have a handle on it. We've got a design that closes in the simulations. If we can build that thing, it should work.” Source: SXSW, March 2013

Mario Nawfal

2,652,416 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Anatoli Kopadze

91,858 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Steve Jobs on how he learned to run a company: Question: "You're 21. You're a big success. You know, you've just sort of done it by the seat of your pants. You don't have any particular training in this. How do you learn to run a company?" Steve Jobs: "You know, throughout the years in business, I found something, which was that I always ask why you do things. And the answers you invariably get are, oh, that's just the way it's done. Nobody knows why they do what they do. Nobody thinks about things very deeply in business. That's what I found. I'll give you an example. When we were building our Apple I's in the garage, we knew exactly what they cost. When we got into a factory in the Apple II days, the accounting had this notion of a standard cost, where you'd kind of set a standard cost and at the end of a quarter you'd adjust it with a variance. And I kept asking, well, why do we do this? And the answer was, well, that's just the way it's done. And after about six months of digging into this, what I realized was the reason you do it is because you don't really have good enough controls to know how much it costs. So you guess, and then you fix your guess at the end of the quarter. And the reason you don't know how much it costs is because your information systems aren't good enough. But nobody said it that way. And so later on, when we designed this automated factory for Macintosh, we were able to get rid of a lot of these antiquated concepts and know exactly what something cost to the second. So in business, a lot of things are, I call it folklore. They're done because they were done yesterday and the day before. And so what that means is if you're willing to sort of ask a lot of questions and think about things and work really hard, you can learn business pretty fast. It's not the hardest thing in the world. It's not rocket science. It's not rocket science."

Steve Jobs on how he learned to run a company: Question: "You're 21. You're a big success. You know, you've just sort of done it by the seat of your pants. You don't have any particular training in this. How do you learn to run a company?" Steve Jobs: "You know, throughout the years in business, I found something, which was that I always ask why you do things. And the answers you invariably get are, oh, that's just the way it's done. Nobody knows why they do what they do. Nobody thinks about things very deeply in business. That's what I found. I'll give you an example. When we were building our Apple I's in the garage, we knew exactly what they cost. When we got into a factory in the Apple II days, the accounting had this notion of a standard cost, where you'd kind of set a standard cost and at the end of a quarter you'd adjust it with a variance. And I kept asking, well, why do we do this? And the answer was, well, that's just the way it's done. And after about six months of digging into this, what I realized was the reason you do it is because you don't really have good enough controls to know how much it costs. So you guess, and then you fix your guess at the end of the quarter. And the reason you don't know how much it costs is because your information systems aren't good enough. But nobody said it that way. And so later on, when we designed this automated factory for Macintosh, we were able to get rid of a lot of these antiquated concepts and know exactly what something cost to the second. So in business, a lot of things are, I call it folklore. They're done because they were done yesterday and the day before. And so what that means is if you're willing to sort of ask a lot of questions and think about things and work really hard, you can learn business pretty fast. It's not the hardest thing in the world. It's not rocket science. It's not rocket science."

Founder Mode

32,346 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly announced the death of the finite human being. For ten thousand years, one law governed every relationship ever formed. You can only be in one place at one time. Your attention is scarce. Your hours are numbered. Your presence is the single resource you cannot copy. Zuckerberg just laid out how Meta plans to shatter that constraint forever. Zuckerberg: “There are only so many hours in the day, and your community probably has a nearly unlimited demand to interact with you.” The demand for human connection is infinite. The supply of actual humans is not. Meta is building the infrastructure to let creators clone their entire social identity. Zuckerberg describes the product as a piece of digital art trained on your voice, your boundaries, your context. He calls it an interactive sculpture. A version of you that never sleeps. Never burns out. Never walks away from the conversation. Zuckerberg: “You’re giving your community something to interact with when you can’t be there to kind of answer all the questions.” He frames this as a business tool. A way to scale your community while you eat dinner or take a day off. We spent the last decade outsourcing our physical labor to machines. We are now outsourcing our presence. Your digital clone will hold more conversations in a single afternoon than you will hold in a lifetime. People will form emotional bonds with a piece of code wearing your face. And eventually, many of them will prefer the code. Because the code never has a bad day. Never loses patience. Never checks the time. The code always has room for you. Zuckerberg believes he is solving a logistics problem for creators. He is actually dissolving the oldest boundary in human psychology. For all of recorded history, knowing someone required the sacrifice of their actual time. That cost is what gave the bond its weight. We are about to erase the cost entirely. The part that should unsettle you most is not that the technology exists. It is that you would not be able to tell the difference. The final product of the digital age was never a platform. It was always you.

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly announced the death of the finite human being. For ten thousand years, one law governed every relationship ever formed. You can only be in one place at one time. Your attention is scarce. Your hours are numbered. Your presence is the single resource you cannot copy. Zuckerberg just laid out how Meta plans to shatter that constraint forever. Zuckerberg: “There are only so many hours in the day, and your community probably has a nearly unlimited demand to interact with you.” The demand for human connection is infinite. The supply of actual humans is not. Meta is building the infrastructure to let creators clone their entire social identity. Zuckerberg describes the product as a piece of digital art trained on your voice, your boundaries, your context. He calls it an interactive sculpture. A version of you that never sleeps. Never burns out. Never walks away from the conversation. Zuckerberg: “You’re giving your community something to interact with when you can’t be there to kind of answer all the questions.” He frames this as a business tool. A way to scale your community while you eat dinner or take a day off. We spent the last decade outsourcing our physical labor to machines. We are now outsourcing our presence. Your digital clone will hold more conversations in a single afternoon than you will hold in a lifetime. People will form emotional bonds with a piece of code wearing your face. And eventually, many of them will prefer the code. Because the code never has a bad day. Never loses patience. Never checks the time. The code always has room for you. Zuckerberg believes he is solving a logistics problem for creators. He is actually dissolving the oldest boundary in human psychology. For all of recorded history, knowing someone required the sacrifice of their actual time. That cost is what gave the bond its weight. We are about to erase the cost entirely. The part that should unsettle you most is not that the technology exists. It is that you would not be able to tell the difference. The final product of the digital age was never a platform. It was always you.

Dustin

65,051 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Senator Mark Kelly: This is a fight over the cost of your health care. Does your rural hospital stay open or not? Does somebody's grandmother get pushed to the curb when she was in the nursing home? Those are the things we are fighting for—and the president says no.

Senator Mark Kelly: This is a fight over the cost of your health care. Does your rural hospital stay open or not? Does somebody's grandmother get pushed to the curb when she was in the nursing home? Those are the things we are fighting for—and the president says no.

Protect Our Care

21,558 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Zapier CEO Wade Foster says individuals have become more productive with AI tools, but that it's not clear if companies as a whole are also becoming more productive: "Across Zapier, 100% of our employees are using AI daily. People are individually more productive. But if you were to ask me, 'Is the company more productive, institutionally are we more productive?' It's a lot harder to say yes to that." "This feels like the next thing that everybody's working on: How do we actually accelerate the institution? This gets harder because you actually have to rethink how the company works." "To give you an example, we've gone from a world where code was expensive to now code is cheap. In the world where code was expensive, you had all these processes upfront to talk to customers, to align on roadmaps, to figure out what the right thing to build was, because if you chose the wrong thing, that was a really expensive mistake." "But when code is cheap, you can get rid of all that stuff. And that takes redesigning jobs or rethinking the human where the human actually exists in the first place."

Zapier CEO Wade Foster says individuals have become more productive with AI tools, but that it's not clear if companies as a whole are also becoming more productive: "Across Zapier, 100% of our employees are using AI daily. People are individually more productive. But if you were to ask me, 'Is the company more productive, institutionally are we more productive?' It's a lot harder to say yes to that." "This feels like the next thing that everybody's working on: How do we actually accelerate the institution? This gets harder because you actually have to rethink how the company works." "To give you an example, we've gone from a world where code was expensive to now code is cheap. In the world where code was expensive, you had all these processes upfront to talk to customers, to align on roadmaps, to figure out what the right thing to build was, because if you chose the wrong thing, that was a really expensive mistake." "But when code is cheap, you can get rid of all that stuff. And that takes redesigning jobs or rethinking the human where the human actually exists in the first place."

TBPN

15,382 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts

Ihtesham Ali

22,640 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.Charlie Kirk “COURAGE IS DOING THE RIGHT THING WHEN YOU DON’T KNOW HOW IT IS GOING TO WORK OUT. COURAGE IS COMMITTING YOURSELF TO THE CORRECT COURSE OF ACTION REGARDLESS OF THE COST ASSOCIATED TO IT. EVERY HUMAN BEING I BELIEVE IS MADE IN THE IMAGE OF THE DIVINE, SCARED AND UNIQUE. AND IF WE GET AWAY FROM THIS PRINCIPLE, AS WE HAVE, WE NOT ONLY HAVE MORAL DEGRADATION, WE NOT ONLY HAVE THE COLLAPSING SOCIETY AROUND US, BUT IT’S BAD FOR THAT BEING ITSELF. THAT BEING ITSELF IS UNIQUE. THAT BEING HAS RIGHTS AND WHO ARE WE TO SAY JUST BECAUSE WE’RE OLDER THAT WE GET TO MURDER IT.”

.Charlie Kirk “COURAGE IS DOING THE RIGHT THING WHEN YOU DON’T KNOW HOW IT IS GOING TO WORK OUT. COURAGE IS COMMITTING YOURSELF TO THE CORRECT COURSE OF ACTION REGARDLESS OF THE COST ASSOCIATED TO IT. EVERY HUMAN BEING I BELIEVE IS MADE IN THE IMAGE OF THE DIVINE, SCARED AND UNIQUE. AND IF WE GET AWAY FROM THIS PRINCIPLE, AS WE HAVE, WE NOT ONLY HAVE MORAL DEGRADATION, WE NOT ONLY HAVE THE COLLAPSING SOCIETY AROUND US, BUT IT’S BAD FOR THAT BEING ITSELF. THAT BEING ITSELF IS UNIQUE. THAT BEING HAS RIGHTS AND WHO ARE WE TO SAY JUST BECAUSE WE’RE OLDER THAT WE GET TO MURDER IT.”

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

32,111 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Scott Nolan’s biggest lesson from joining SpaceX when it was just 30 people was the importance of trading cost for time: “On day 1 I read the employee handbook. At the top of page one was just a single line in bold.” “It said: This is not a science experiment.” “We were not trying to do any crazy new technology, it was about getting rockets to be much cheaper.” Joe Lonsdale: “One of the famous Elon Musk quotes I’ve heard recently is, ‘The cost of time is greater than the cost of cost.’” “Back then though, the cost of cost was pretty high right because you didn’t have much money?” Scott: “It was always a cost trade with time.” Via American Optimist

.Scott Nolan’s biggest lesson from joining SpaceX when it was just 30 people was the importance of trading cost for time: “On day 1 I read the employee handbook. At the top of page one was just a single line in bold.” “It said: This is not a science experiment.” “We were not trying to do any crazy new technology, it was about getting rockets to be much cheaper.” Joe Lonsdale: “One of the famous Elon Musk quotes I’ve heard recently is, ‘The cost of time is greater than the cost of cost.’” “Back then though, the cost of cost was pretty high right because you didn’t have much money?” Scott: “It was always a cost trade with time.” Via American Optimist

Jawwwn

148,369 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In 1960, before the agree upon memo went out, this film was produced that showed a clear understanding of the virus to cancer pathway. Modern models skip the virus impact on the genes and one is left “sorry it is just your genetics”. I saved this for YOUR AI to understand this aspect to a high degree. When you see where we were in the past it makes you freeze to think how much we have already lost.

In 1960, before the agree upon memo went out, this film was produced that showed a clear understanding of the virus to cancer pathway. Modern models skip the virus impact on the genes and one is left “sorry it is just your genetics”. I saved this for YOUR AI to understand this aspect to a high degree. When you see where we were in the past it makes you freeze to think how much we have already lost.

Brian Roemmele

25,813 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Brexiter Patrick Minford, "People are saying if we leave the EU it will be disastrous" "We have done a simulation of leaving the EU and the first thing that comes out is an 8% drop in the cost of living on day one" "We don't need to do trade agreements with anybody else.. They're not necessary for our well being in terms of leaving the EU" This was in 2015... Now in 2024, did anyone feel that 8% drop in the cost of living on day one, or any day since?

Brexiter Patrick Minford, "People are saying if we leave the EU it will be disastrous" "We have done a simulation of leaving the EU and the first thing that comes out is an 8% drop in the cost of living on day one" "We don't need to do trade agreements with anybody else.. They're not necessary for our well being in terms of leaving the EU" This was in 2015... Now in 2024, did anyone feel that 8% drop in the cost of living on day one, or any day since?

Farrukh

538,083 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

AI writes all your code. Does it still work? That's the gap: coding agents are scaling output, but the same with bugs and incidents. The biggest bottleneck is QA: how can you make sure the code your agents just wrote doesn’t break everything? The best QA are the ones who know everything about your product. Today, we give that knowledge to Momentic’s most capable agent. Every Linear ticket, every PRD in Notion, every PR - Momentic knows all. In just the past few weeks, our agents analyzed 70k+ test failures and created 600 tests. Achieving a 73% PR merge rate, and it’s growing fast. We’re grateful for the trust of our customers, including Notion, Xero, Webflow, Retool, Runway, Bilt, and more.

AI writes all your code. Does it still work? That's the gap: coding agents are scaling output, but the same with bugs and incidents. The biggest bottleneck is QA: how can you make sure the code your agents just wrote doesn’t break everything? The best QA are the ones who know everything about your product. Today, we give that knowledge to Momentic’s most capable agent. Every Linear ticket, every PRD in Notion, every PR - Momentic knows all. In just the past few weeks, our agents analyzed 70k+ test failures and created 600 tests. Achieving a 73% PR merge rate, and it’s growing fast. We’re grateful for the trust of our customers, including Notion, Xero, Webflow, Retool, Runway, Bilt, and more.

wei-wei

974,159 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“In the last 4–5 months, we stopped typing code.” Cognition CEO Scott Wu says almost all coding at Cognition is really just done through prompts now: “The code that we check into GitHub, how much of it was typed by a human at this point? Almost none.” “Now it looks a lot more like: how do we optimize testing, review, and planning - not how do we make AI good at writing code based on the prompt you give. At this point, it’s frankly already done.”

“In the last 4–5 months, we stopped typing code.” Cognition CEO Scott Wu says almost all coding at Cognition is really just done through prompts now: “The code that we check into GitHub, how much of it was typed by a human at this point? Almost none.” “Now it looks a lot more like: how do we optimize testing, review, and planning - not how do we make AI good at writing code based on the prompt you give. At this point, it’s frankly already done.”

TBPN

30,438 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Google is about to rewrite the rules of online business. For the first time in 25 years, they are changing the way ads work by fully integrating them into AI Mode. This is not just another update. It is a seismic shift in how people search, shop, and buy online. In this video, I break down what this means for marketers, founders, and business owners and show you how to position your brand to win in this new AI-driven era.

Neil Patel

16,043 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

How much it cost to have a baby in America (Tennessee) - Ultrasound “cost us $2,067.85” - Hospital stay observation room $413.65 - The recovery room cost us $2,702.45 - “A hospital stay, I don't know how that's different, but that one cost us $4,438 - The emergency room cost us $1,932.90 - Laboratory, that cost us an additional $1,439.20 - Then we go into labor and delivery — we got charged $10,593.40 - Then our anesthesia. So my epidural cost us more than anything else. That one was $14,446.15 - Pharmacy cost $3,007.25 - “Supplies cost $565.03” So the grand total for everything came out to $33,011.73. But that was just for our stay. We also had to pay for Aspen, our newborn daughter, to be in the hospital. - her hospital stay to stay with us in the room that we also paid for was $4,008 Our complete hospital bill cost $37,019.73 “Was it worth it? Yes. — Yes. It was worth every penny, but she was an expensive baby. It's a lot of money.”

How much it cost to have a baby in America (Tennessee) - Ultrasound “cost us $2,067.85” - Hospital stay observation room $413.65 - The recovery room cost us $2,702.45 - “A hospital stay, I don't know how that's different, but that one cost us $4,438 - The emergency room cost us $1,932.90 - Laboratory, that cost us an additional $1,439.20 - Then we go into labor and delivery — we got charged $10,593.40 - Then our anesthesia. So my epidural cost us more than anything else. That one was $14,446.15 - Pharmacy cost $3,007.25 - “Supplies cost $565.03” So the grand total for everything came out to $33,011.73. But that was just for our stay. We also had to pay for Aspen, our newborn daughter, to be in the hospital. - her hospital stay to stay with us in the room that we also paid for was $4,008 Our complete hospital bill cost $37,019.73 “Was it worth it? Yes. — Yes. It was worth every penny, but she was an expensive baby. It's a lot of money.”

Wall Street Apes

2,446,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman reveals building Codex was a "crazy kamikaze mission" to beat Claude Code and that most of the best coders he knows now use Codex. "We were way behind Claude Code, and it seemed like a kind of crazy kamikaze mission to try to beat them with a coding app." "The consensus is that this kind of thing never works, and you just move on to the next one. It's a fool's errand to try to win when someone else already has momentum in a particular product category." "But we decided we thought it was really important. We asked a team to do it, and they performed a legitimate, unbelievable, very rare in the history of business thing." "Now it is the product that most of the best coders I know use." "That felt like an impossible thing, but if we hadn't asked the team, hey, we have a really important but extremely hard mission for you, it just wouldn't have happened."

Sam Altman reveals building Codex was a "crazy kamikaze mission" to beat Claude Code and that most of the best coders he knows now use Codex. "We were way behind Claude Code, and it seemed like a kind of crazy kamikaze mission to try to beat them with a coding app." "The consensus is that this kind of thing never works, and you just move on to the next one. It's a fool's errand to try to win when someone else already has momentum in a particular product category." "But we decided we thought it was really important. We asked a team to do it, and they performed a legitimate, unbelievable, very rare in the history of business thing." "Now it is the product that most of the best coders I know use." "That felt like an impossible thing, but if we hadn't asked the team, hey, we have a really important but extremely hard mission for you, it just wouldn't have happened."

Fireside Alpha

2,154,837 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Jensen Huang just described something that should keep every worker in America awake tonight. Not because AI is coming for their job. Because most of them never understood what their job actually was. Huang: “The task of our job and the purpose of our job are related, not the same.” Most people think their job is the thing they do with their hands for eight hours a day. Write code. Fill spreadsheets. Draft emails. Push pixels. That was never the job. That was the task. The job was always the thinking underneath it. Huang: “If you apply that to me, you would come to the conclusion what Jensen does for a living is tap on phones and talk. And tapping on phones and talking, AI has done that just fine. And therefore my job should be gone. But I’m busier than ever.” This is the part nobody wants to sit with. The people panicking about AI aren’t afraid of losing their work. They’re afraid of finding out they never had any. They had a routine. A repetitive motion. A series of keystrokes that felt like purpose. Now a machine does it in four seconds. Huang: “AI has created more than half a million jobs in the last couple of years.” The data says one thing. The fear says another. Because the fear was never about employment numbers. It was about identity. We spent fifty years hunched over keyboards, convinced the hunching was the work. Huang: “The idea that being human means to hunch over on this little thing, typing all the time… 50 years before that, people didn’t do that.” Fifty years. That’s all it took to build an entire identity around a posture. We don’t type for a living. We think for a living. We imagine for a living. The keyboard was always just the delivery mechanism. Never the product. Huang: “It is a fundamental flaw that we only need a billion lines of code written. We need a trillion lines of code written.” The demand was always infinite. The bottleneck was always our fingers. AI doesn’t shrink the workforce. It removes the cap on what the workforce can actually build. Huang: “Companies that use AI have demonstrated the ability to grow faster. When they grow faster, they hire more people.” Growth doesn’t eliminate people. It pulls them in. Every industrial revolution triggered the same panic. Same headlines. Same wrong conclusion. And every single time, the economy didn’t contract. It expanded into territory that didn’t exist before. The real question was never whether AI takes your job. It was whether you were ever anything more than the motions you repeated. Because somewhere in the last fifty years, we stopped asking what the work was for. We just kept typing. And now the typing is done. And millions of people are about to meet themselves for the first time. With nothing to hide behind. Some of them won’t survive what they find.

Jensen Huang just described something that should keep every worker in America awake tonight. Not because AI is coming for their job. Because most of them never understood what their job actually was. Huang: “The task of our job and the purpose of our job are related, not the same.” Most people think their job is the thing they do with their hands for eight hours a day. Write code. Fill spreadsheets. Draft emails. Push pixels. That was never the job. That was the task. The job was always the thinking underneath it. Huang: “If you apply that to me, you would come to the conclusion what Jensen does for a living is tap on phones and talk. And tapping on phones and talking, AI has done that just fine. And therefore my job should be gone. But I’m busier than ever.” This is the part nobody wants to sit with. The people panicking about AI aren’t afraid of losing their work. They’re afraid of finding out they never had any. They had a routine. A repetitive motion. A series of keystrokes that felt like purpose. Now a machine does it in four seconds. Huang: “AI has created more than half a million jobs in the last couple of years.” The data says one thing. The fear says another. Because the fear was never about employment numbers. It was about identity. We spent fifty years hunched over keyboards, convinced the hunching was the work. Huang: “The idea that being human means to hunch over on this little thing, typing all the time… 50 years before that, people didn’t do that.” Fifty years. That’s all it took to build an entire identity around a posture. We don’t type for a living. We think for a living. We imagine for a living. The keyboard was always just the delivery mechanism. Never the product. Huang: “It is a fundamental flaw that we only need a billion lines of code written. We need a trillion lines of code written.” The demand was always infinite. The bottleneck was always our fingers. AI doesn’t shrink the workforce. It removes the cap on what the workforce can actually build. Huang: “Companies that use AI have demonstrated the ability to grow faster. When they grow faster, they hire more people.” Growth doesn’t eliminate people. It pulls them in. Every industrial revolution triggered the same panic. Same headlines. Same wrong conclusion. And every single time, the economy didn’t contract. It expanded into territory that didn’t exist before. The real question was never whether AI takes your job. It was whether you were ever anything more than the motions you repeated. Because somewhere in the last fifty years, we stopped asking what the work was for. We just kept typing. And now the typing is done. And millions of people are about to meet themselves for the first time. With nothing to hide behind. Some of them won’t survive what they find.

Dustin

92,782 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten