正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Same prompt. Same story. Two models. One intense car chase. I put Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.5 on CapCut through the exact same 30-second Hollywood style chase sequence to compare vehicle physics, camera stability, motion blur, character consistency, dialogue, and overall cinematic realism. No prompt changes. No shortcuts. Just... show more

Natalia

12,138 subscribers

35,789 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术游戏

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

marcus

68,861 次观看 • 1 个月前

Google DeepMind Just tested Gemini Omni Flash against Seedance 2.0 right after the launch 👀 We ran the same prompts side-by-side to compare real generation quality, motion, and consistency. Sharing the results here ↓

Google DeepMind Just tested Gemini Omni Flash against Seedance 2.0 right after the launch 👀 We ran the same prompts side-by-side to compare real generation quality, motion, and consistency. Sharing the results here ↓

TopviewAI

24,787 次观看 • 4 个月前

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2

MrDejie

133,840 次观看 • 3 个月前

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

Fathela Esq

38,737 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,658 次观看 • 7 个月前

For anime-style videos, Seedance 2.5 is honestly impressive. 🔥 The difference from 2.0 may not feel huge for anime, but 2.5 still brings better overall consistency and motion quality. And when it comes to realistic, cinematic videos, Seedance 2.5 really stands out. 🎬✨ If you want the best overall quality, I’d still go with Seedance 2.5. ✨ Prompt in the comments.

For anime-style videos, Seedance 2.5 is honestly impressive. 🔥 The difference from 2.0 may not feel huge for anime, but 2.5 still brings better overall consistency and motion quality. And when it comes to realistic, cinematic videos, Seedance 2.5 really stands out. 🎬✨ If you want the best overall quality, I’d still go with Seedance 2.5. ✨ Prompt in the comments.

Amelia

23,522 次观看 • 14 天前

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

Latte

167,558 次观看 • 7 个月前

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Jibril

113,346 次观看 • 5 个月前

This entire ad? AI-generated. No camera, no studio, no actors. Putting Seedance 2.0 through a rigorous commercial test to see how it handles luxury product consistency, macro skin details, and 3D motion. Full prompt and storyboard details in the comments

This entire ad? AI-generated. No camera, no studio, no actors. Putting Seedance 2.0 through a rigorous commercial test to see how it handles luxury product consistency, macro skin details, and 3D motion. Full prompt and storyboard details in the comments

Fathela Esq

31,913 次观看 • 2 个月前

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Ivanna | AI Art & Prompts

23,642 次观看 • 3 个月前

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

FlovaAI

477,222 次观看 • 5 个月前

For “The Final Callback,” I used Seedream 5.0 Pro via Lumina to shape the theatre and characters, SeedAudio for the dialogue and emotional soundscape, and Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to bring the full 30-second cinematic drama to life. The biggest surprise during my test wasn't just the cinematic quality—it was how much less trial-and-error the workflow required. For emotional scenes like these, I would normally regenerate multiple versions before getting a usable performance. With Seedance 2.5, I was able to achieve production-ready results in around 1-2 attempts, which significantly reduced generation costs while saving a lot of production time. That efficiency let me spend more time refining the story instead of constantly rerolling shots. The realism is what really completes the experience: Maya's restrained performance, natural dialogue delivery, subtle pauses, realistic character movement, and smooth cinematic camera motion make the scene feel much closer to a real film than an AI-generated clip. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and now you can try it directly on Lumina.

For “The Final Callback,” I used Seedream 5.0 Pro via Lumina to shape the theatre and characters, SeedAudio for the dialogue and emotional soundscape, and Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to bring the full 30-second cinematic drama to life. The biggest surprise during my test wasn't just the cinematic quality—it was how much less trial-and-error the workflow required. For emotional scenes like these, I would normally regenerate multiple versions before getting a usable performance. With Seedance 2.5, I was able to achieve production-ready results in around 1-2 attempts, which significantly reduced generation costs while saving a lot of production time. That efficiency let me spend more time refining the story instead of constantly rerolling shots. The realism is what really completes the experience: Maya's restrained performance, natural dialogue delivery, subtle pauses, realistic character movement, and smooth cinematic camera motion make the scene feel much closer to a real film than an AI-generated clip. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and now you can try it directly on Lumina.

Marry claire

25,293 次观看 • 1 个月前

Seedance 2.5 is now LIVE on OpenGradient! This entire film was generated from a single prompt. One take, no edits. → Up to 30-second clips from one prompt → 10,000 character prompts for full scene-by-scene direction → Up to 30 reference uploads for character and environment consistency → Native audio and sound design built in Even the judges agree: it's a 2.5. Try it now →

Seedance 2.5 is now LIVE on OpenGradient! This entire film was generated from a single prompt. One take, no edits. → Up to 30-second clips from one prompt → 10,000 character prompts for full scene-by-scene direction → Up to 30 reference uploads for character and environment consistency → Native audio and sound design built in Even the judges agree: it's a 2.5. Try it now →

OpenGradient (∇, ∇)

12,051 次观看 • 1 个月前

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,990 次观看 • 6 个月前

Lowest price anywhere for Seedance 2.0 — and it's permanent. No countdowns, no coupons, no minimum spend. $1 now buys 88 seconds of Seedance 2.0 Mini. That's 68% under the official rate for the same endpoint. But Fast is the one to watch: at $0.027/s you get near-flagship quality for a quarter of the flagship price, 52% under official. Need native 1080p, 4K, or video editing? Those live on Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 — same key, same pool.

Lowest price anywhere for Seedance 2.0 — and it's permanent. No countdowns, no coupons, no minimum spend. $1 now buys 88 seconds of Seedance 2.0 Mini. That's 68% under the official rate for the same endpoint. But Fast is the one to watch: at $0.027/s you get near-flagship quality for a quarter of the flagship price, 52% under official. Need native 1080p, 4K, or video editing? Those live on Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 — same key, same pool.

Atlas Cloud

38,137 次观看 • 19 天前

Creating an experimental anime film with Seedance 2.5 on CapCut has completely changed how I approach AI video production. For this project, I started with a character sheet to lock the character’s identity, costume, facial features, color palette, and hand-drawn ink style. From there, I built cinematic sequences around extreme close-ups, dynamic camera movement, expressive ink strokes, motion smears, typography, and editorial-style compositions. What makes this workflow especially powerful is that Seedance 2.5 is officially available on CapCut, giving creators first access to its full capabilities directly inside the creative workflow. Instead of generating a shot and moving to another tool for everything else, I can generate with Seedance 2.5 and continue refining the result in the same workflow and selecting the strongest moments, refining individual shots, making localized edits, and directing changes with natural-language commands. The long-form capability is also important for projects like this. Being able to create shots up to 30 seconds and extend scenes while maintaining character, scene, and motion consistency makes it possible to think beyond isolated AI clips and start building actual visual sequences. For this project, precision matters. Timestamp-based prompting, reference-based generation, localized editing, and more controlled creative direction allow me to design the sequence almost like a traditional production pipeline, while keeping the speed and flexibility of generative AI. The result I’m aiming for isn’t simply “an AI-generated anime video.” It’s a cohesive visual language: hand-drawn emerald ink, editorial Japanese typography, expressive animation, cinematic framing, and a consistent character moving through an evolving graphic world. This is where AI video becomes much more interesting to me, not just generating images that move, but directing an entire visual production from concept to final sequence. Seedance 2.5 + CapCut gives creators a much more complete environment to explore that workflow. And this is only the beginning. Powered by : CapCut CapCut Indonesia

Creating an experimental anime film with Seedance 2.5 on CapCut has completely changed how I approach AI video production. For this project, I started with a character sheet to lock the character’s identity, costume, facial features, color palette, and hand-drawn ink style. From there, I built cinematic sequences around extreme close-ups, dynamic camera movement, expressive ink strokes, motion smears, typography, and editorial-style compositions. What makes this workflow especially powerful is that Seedance 2.5 is officially available on CapCut, giving creators first access to its full capabilities directly inside the creative workflow. Instead of generating a shot and moving to another tool for everything else, I can generate with Seedance 2.5 and continue refining the result in the same workflow and selecting the strongest moments, refining individual shots, making localized edits, and directing changes with natural-language commands. The long-form capability is also important for projects like this. Being able to create shots up to 30 seconds and extend scenes while maintaining character, scene, and motion consistency makes it possible to think beyond isolated AI clips and start building actual visual sequences. For this project, precision matters. Timestamp-based prompting, reference-based generation, localized editing, and more controlled creative direction allow me to design the sequence almost like a traditional production pipeline, while keeping the speed and flexibility of generative AI. The result I’m aiming for isn’t simply “an AI-generated anime video.” It’s a cohesive visual language: hand-drawn emerald ink, editorial Japanese typography, expressive animation, cinematic framing, and a consistent character moving through an evolving graphic world. This is where AI video becomes much more interesting to me, not just generating images that move, but directing an entire visual production from concept to final sequence. Seedance 2.5 + CapCut gives creators a much more complete environment to explore that workflow. And this is only the beginning. Powered by : CapCut CapCut Indonesia

Kick Nost

11,288 次观看 • 1 个月前

AI video generation is advancing at an incredible pace and it's exciting to see tools that continue pushing the boundaries of what's possible. Better motion consistency, stronger prompt adherence and more polished results are making AI an even more powerful creative partner. Seedance 2.5 on Morphic is definitely one of the developments I'm excited to explore. It's great to see Morphic AI bringing cutting edge video models to creators and making high-quality AI video generation more accessible. Looking forward to seeing the creative projects the community builds and how this technology continues to evolve. Seedance 2.5 on Morphic 🚀

AI video generation is advancing at an incredible pace and it's exciting to see tools that continue pushing the boundaries of what's possible. Better motion consistency, stronger prompt adherence and more polished results are making AI an even more powerful creative partner. Seedance 2.5 on Morphic is definitely one of the developments I'm excited to explore. It's great to see Morphic AI bringing cutting edge video models to creators and making high-quality AI video generation more accessible. Looking forward to seeing the creative projects the community builds and how this technology continues to evolve. Seedance 2.5 on Morphic 🚀

NIJ Ruvos

34,043 次观看 • 1 个月前

🎬 Midjourney + Kling + Higgsfield + Seedance Pro + Veo 3.1 + Udio: "Beyond Tonight" (AI short) Projects like this are a great way to test different models: when I needed shifting focus, I used Kling 2.5, for multi-shots, Veo 3.1 felt best and Seedance Pro worked well for other shots. Whenever you can, try testing the same image across different models and see which one feels best to you! Images: Midjourney v7 and Runway Video: Kling AI , Seedance Pro and Veo 3.1 Fast on Higgsfield AI 🧩 Music: Udio Editing: CapCut

🎬 Midjourney + Kling + Higgsfield + Seedance Pro + Veo 3.1 + Udio: "Beyond Tonight" (AI short) Projects like this are a great way to test different models: when I needed shifting focus, I used Kling 2.5, for multi-shots, Veo 3.1 felt best and Seedance Pro worked well for other shots. Whenever you can, try testing the same image across different models and see which one feels best to you! Images: Midjourney v7 and Runway Video: Kling AI , Seedance Pro and Veo 3.1 Fast on Higgsfield AI 🧩 Music: Udio Editing: CapCut

Everett World

19,926 次观看 • 11 个月前

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 次观看 • 7 个月前

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,989 次观看 • 7 个月前