Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Same prompt. Same story. Two models. One intense car chase. I put Seedance 2.0 and Seedance 2.5 on CapCut through the exact same 30-second Hollywood style chase sequence to compare vehicle physics, camera stability, motion blur, character consistency, dialogue, and overall cinematic realism. No prompt changes. No shortcuts. Just... show more

Natalia

12,149 subscribers

28,172 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Oyun

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

marcus

68,861 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Google DeepMind Just tested Gemini Omni Flash against Seedance 2.0 right after the launch 👀 We ran the same prompts side-by-side to compare real generation quality, motion, and consistency. Sharing the results here ↓

Google DeepMind Just tested Gemini Omni Flash against Seedance 2.0 right after the launch 👀 We ran the same prompts side-by-side to compare real generation quality, motion, and consistency. Sharing the results here ↓

TopviewAI

24,787 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2

MrDejie

133,840 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

FATHELA ESQ

38,646 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,557 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

Latte

167,558 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Jibril

113,346 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This entire ad? AI-generated. No camera, no studio, no actors. Putting Seedance 2.0 through a rigorous commercial test to see how it handles luxury product consistency, macro skin details, and 3D motion. Full prompt and storyboard details in the comments

This entire ad? AI-generated. No camera, no studio, no actors. Putting Seedance 2.0 through a rigorous commercial test to see how it handles luxury product consistency, macro skin details, and 3D motion. Full prompt and storyboard details in the comments

FATHELA ESQ

31,846 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Seedance 2.0 vs Omni Flash 🥊 Ngl, this side-by-side comparison is kinda wild. I took the exact same storyboard and ran it through both models to see how they handle movement and consistency. 🎨 Storyboard: GPT Image 2 🎬 Animation: Seedance 2.0 (Top) vs Omni Flash (Bottom) Tbh both models popped off, but the vibes are totally different. Are you team 🐶 (Seedance) or team 🐱 (Omni)? Let’s settle this in the replies! 👇 (Dropping the exact prompts in the thread 🧵)

Ivanna | AI Art & Prompts

23,642 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

FlovaAI

475,640 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

For “The Final Callback,” I used Seedream 5.0 Pro via Lumina to shape the theatre and characters, SeedAudio for the dialogue and emotional soundscape, and Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to bring the full 30-second cinematic drama to life. The biggest surprise during my test wasn't just the cinematic quality—it was how much less trial-and-error the workflow required. For emotional scenes like these, I would normally regenerate multiple versions before getting a usable performance. With Seedance 2.5, I was able to achieve production-ready results in around 1-2 attempts, which significantly reduced generation costs while saving a lot of production time. That efficiency let me spend more time refining the story instead of constantly rerolling shots. The realism is what really completes the experience: Maya's restrained performance, natural dialogue delivery, subtle pauses, realistic character movement, and smooth cinematic camera motion make the scene feel much closer to a real film than an AI-generated clip. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and now you can try it directly on Lumina.

For “The Final Callback,” I used Seedream 5.0 Pro via Lumina to shape the theatre and characters, SeedAudio for the dialogue and emotional soundscape, and Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to bring the full 30-second cinematic drama to life. The biggest surprise during my test wasn't just the cinematic quality—it was how much less trial-and-error the workflow required. For emotional scenes like these, I would normally regenerate multiple versions before getting a usable performance. With Seedance 2.5, I was able to achieve production-ready results in around 1-2 attempts, which significantly reduced generation costs while saving a lot of production time. That efficiency let me spend more time refining the story instead of constantly rerolling shots. The realism is what really completes the experience: Maya's restrained performance, natural dialogue delivery, subtle pauses, realistic character movement, and smooth cinematic camera motion make the scene feel much closer to a real film than an AI-generated clip. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and now you can try it directly on Lumina.

Marry claire

25,293 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,612 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🎬 Midjourney + Kling + Higgsfield + Seedance Pro + Veo 3.1 + Udio: "Beyond Tonight" (AI short) Projects like this are a great way to test different models: when I needed shifting focus, I used Kling 2.5, for multi-shots, Veo 3.1 felt best and Seedance Pro worked well for other shots. Whenever you can, try testing the same image across different models and see which one feels best to you! Images: Midjourney v7 and Runway Video: Kling AI , Seedance Pro and Veo 3.1 Fast on Higgsfield AI 🧩 Music: Udio Editing: CapCut

🎬 Midjourney + Kling + Higgsfield + Seedance Pro + Veo 3.1 + Udio: "Beyond Tonight" (AI short) Projects like this are a great way to test different models: when I needed shifting focus, I used Kling 2.5, for multi-shots, Veo 3.1 felt best and Seedance Pro worked well for other shots. Whenever you can, try testing the same image across different models and see which one feels best to you! Images: Midjourney v7 and Runway Video: Kling AI , Seedance Pro and Veo 3.1 Fast on Higgsfield AI 🧩 Music: Udio Editing: CapCut

Everett World

19,926 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,989 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

AI video generation is moving incredibly fast, and it’s exciting to see tools reaching a level where high-quality results are becoming much more accessible. I’ve been exploring Seedance 2.5 on Morphic and it’s impressive how well it handles motion, prompt understanding, visual consistency, and cinematic quality. It’s the kind of update that gives creators more freedom to experiment without spending hours refining every scene. The pace of innovation in AI video is unreal, and I’m looking forward to pushing this model with even more creative ideas. Created using Seedance 2.5 on Morphic. 🎬✨ What would you create with it first?

AI video generation is moving incredibly fast, and it’s exciting to see tools reaching a level where high-quality results are becoming much more accessible. I’ve been exploring Seedance 2.5 on Morphic and it’s impressive how well it handles motion, prompt understanding, visual consistency, and cinematic quality. It’s the kind of update that gives creators more freedom to experiment without spending hours refining every scene. The pace of innovation in AI video is unreal, and I’m looking forward to pushing this model with even more creative ideas. Created using Seedance 2.5 on Morphic. 🎬✨ What would you create with it first?

Marry Evan

71,164 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Check out our latest AI video comparison! This time we're putting Kling 1.6 head-to-head with Luma's new Ray2 image-to-video feature. We used the same image and the same prompt for both ("subtle camera movement, natural motion"), just like in our recent Pika 2.1 test. The results? Super interesting! Ray2 brings more dynamic motion and cinematic colors to the table, though with some distortion, while Kling keeps its reputation for solid quality and stability. Love seeing these different approaches to the same challenge. Which one do you like better?

Check out our latest AI video comparison! This time we're putting Kling 1.6 head-to-head with Luma's new Ray2 image-to-video feature. We used the same image and the same prompt for both ("subtle camera movement, natural motion"), just like in our recent Pika 2.1 test. The results? Super interesting! Ray2 brings more dynamic motion and cinematic colors to the table, though with some distortion, while Kling keeps its reputation for solid quality and stability. Love seeing these different approaches to the same challenge. Which one do you like better?

Curious Refuge

42,151 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🎬 Want to create cinematic AI videos in seconds? Here’s exactly how I do it using Seedance 2.0 on Yapper: Most people get this wrong… your results depend on how well you *direct* the AI. Here’s the workflow 👇 ✅ Step 1: Open Yapper Go to Create → Video ✅ Step 2: Choose your model Select Seedance 2.0 This model delivers smooth motion, dynamic camera angles, realistic lighting, and strong scene consistency. ✅ Step 3: Write a strong prompt Your prompt is your director. Be specific: Camera movement (pan, zoom, tracking shot) Lighting (golden hour, neon, soft shadows) Environment (city, desert, luxury interior) ✅ Step 4: Add a reference image (optional) Use this to guide style, composition, or subject for more control and consistency. ✅ Step 5: Hit Generate In seconds, your idea turns into a cinematic sequence. 🚀 Pro tip: If it’s not perfect, tweak your prompt — small changes = big difference. From idea → cinematic video in seconds.

🎬 Want to create cinematic AI videos in seconds? Here’s exactly how I do it using Seedance 2.0 on Yapper: Most people get this wrong… your results depend on how well you direct the AI. Here’s the workflow 👇 ✅ Step 1: Open Yapper Go to Create → Video ✅ Step 2: Choose your model Select Seedance 2.0 This model delivers smooth motion, dynamic camera angles, realistic lighting, and strong scene consistency. ✅ Step 3: Write a strong prompt Your prompt is your director. Be specific: Camera movement (pan, zoom, tracking shot) Lighting (golden hour, neon, soft shadows) Environment (city, desert, luxury interior) ✅ Step 4: Add a reference image (optional) Use this to guide style, composition, or subject for more control and consistency. ✅ Step 5: Hit Generate In seconds, your idea turns into a cinematic sequence. 🚀 Pro tip: If it’s not perfect, tweak your prompt — small changes = big difference. From idea → cinematic video in seconds.

Kuria | AI

43,685 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

So Runway Gen 4.5 finally adds image-to-video, the workflow most pros rely on for consistency. We put it head to head with Kling AI and Flow by Google VEO using the same reference images and prompts (below) to evaluate motion quality, stability, and cinematic realism. 1. Action/WaterPhysics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a man running in a shallow river. The camera is tracking the man from behind as he runs up the river. Handheld camera shake as the camera follows the man. 2. Fire Physics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of terrified woman running towards her burning barn. She abruptly stops, and puts in hands on her head as she watches her barn burn down. 3. VFX test prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a hooded figure. Flashes of purple magic and smoke whirl around the figure. The figure lifts its arms as the purple magic and smoke intensifies. 4. 2D Animation Test Prompt: 2D animated shot of a waiting at a bus stop in a thunderstorm. The man turns, walks to the bench, and sits down. 5. 3D Animation Test Prompt: 3D animated shot of an octopus. The octopus reaches into a coral and picks up a glowing white gem. 6. Conversation Test Prompt: slow camera push-in as two friends are having a conversation at a coffee shop Overall verdict: Despite the “world’s best” claim, Runway Gen 4.5 is not there yet. Prompt adherence is solid, but motion, physics, and cinematic realism still lag behind tools like Kling and VEO. Great platform, mid-tier model for now.

So Runway Gen 4.5 finally adds image-to-video, the workflow most pros rely on for consistency. We put it head to head with Kling AI and Flow by Google VEO using the same reference images and prompts (below) to evaluate motion quality, stability, and cinematic realism. 1. Action/WaterPhysics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a man running in a shallow river. The camera is tracking the man from behind as he runs up the river. Handheld camera shake as the camera follows the man. 2. Fire Physics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of terrified woman running towards her burning barn. She abruptly stops, and puts in hands on her head as she watches her barn burn down. 3. VFX test prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a hooded figure. Flashes of purple magic and smoke whirl around the figure. The figure lifts its arms as the purple magic and smoke intensifies. 4. 2D Animation Test Prompt: 2D animated shot of a waiting at a bus stop in a thunderstorm. The man turns, walks to the bench, and sits down. 5. 3D Animation Test Prompt: 3D animated shot of an octopus. The octopus reaches into a coral and picks up a glowing white gem. 6. Conversation Test Prompt: slow camera push-in as two friends are having a conversation at a coffee shop Overall verdict: Despite the “world’s best” claim, Runway Gen 4.5 is not there yet. Prompt adherence is solid, but motion, physics, and cinematic realism still lag behind tools like Kling and VEO. Great platform, mid-tier model for now.

Curious Refuge

25,538 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

VoxelPlot

125,934 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce