正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Google DeepMind’s real-time video AI doctor is here. They just introduced AI co-clinician, a triadic care system built to work under a doctor’s supervision during patient care. The system is built to retrieve clinical-grade evidence, verify it, and in patient-facing simulations use a dual-agent setup where one module talks...

rohanpaul_ai's profile picture

Rohan Paul

150,405 subscribers

27,741 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I don’t want to work in a system that requires heroic effort to get to the appropriate outcome. This interview with New York Times Opinion made something very clear. Dr. Troyen Brennan, a former chief medical officer at CVS Health, which owns Aetna insurance, shared that denials can be appealed and often overturned. And technically, that is true. But what happens in real life is different. Many denials are never appealed. People are exhausted, they are sick, and they do not have the time or support to keep fighting. So the care does not get overturned. It simply does not happen. Applying resistance to both the patient and the physician often leads to that outcome, not because the care is inappropriate, but because the process becomes too difficult to sustain. We should be building a system where doing the right thing for the patient is the easiest path, not the hardest one. If you have ever been told no by your insurance, this is part of why. You can watch the full interview on YouTube here:
1:01

I don’t want to work in a system that requires heroic effort to get to the appropriate outcome. This interview with New York Times Opinion made something very clear. Dr. Troyen Brennan, a former chief medical officer at CVS Health, which owns Aetna insurance, shared that denials can be appealed and often overturned. And technically, that is true. But what happens in real life is different. Many denials are never appealed. People are exhausted, they are sick, and they do not have the time or support to keep fighting. So the care does not get overturned. It simply does not happen. Applying resistance to both the patient and the physician often leads to that outcome, not because the care is inappropriate, but because the process becomes too difficult to sustain. We should be building a system where doing the right thing for the patient is the easiest path, not the hardest one. If you have ever been told no by your insurance, this is part of why. You can watch the full interview on YouTube here:

Elisabeth Potter MD

10,769 次观看 • 3 个月前

A nurse practitioner contacted me privately after my last video about the military needing doctors and nurses. They asked to stay anonymous, and I’m going to respect that. What they shared wasn’t about one doctor or one patient—it was about incentives in the system. There are large, well-known companies that process blood work for huge portions of the country. According to them, results often come back framed in a way that suggests something is always still wrong. The concern is this: if a patient is told they’ve improved, fixed the issue, or no longer need monitoring, that patient may not be a repeat customer. So instead, people stay on the hamster wheel—more tests, more follow-ups, more worry. This isn’t me saying every lab or every provider is corrupt. It is saying we need to talk about how profit-driven incentives can distort healthcare outcomes in the U.S. A system built on repeat customers will never be optimized for people getting better.
1:06

A nurse practitioner contacted me privately after my last video about the military needing doctors and nurses. They asked to stay anonymous, and I’m going to respect that. What they shared wasn’t about one doctor or one patient—it was about incentives in the system. There are large, well-known companies that process blood work for huge portions of the country. According to them, results often come back framed in a way that suggests something is always still wrong. The concern is this: if a patient is told they’ve improved, fixed the issue, or no longer need monitoring, that patient may not be a repeat customer. So instead, people stay on the hamster wheel—more tests, more follow-ups, more worry. This isn’t me saying every lab or every provider is corrupt. It is saying we need to talk about how profit-driven incentives can distort healthcare outcomes in the U.S. A system built on repeat customers will never be optimized for people getting better.

Anttsinc

48,047 次观看 • 6 个月前

This is happening more than people realize. A woman fighting breast cancer showed up for surgery today…fresh off of chemo, port in place, nothing to eat or drink, mentally preparing for the thing no one can ever truly be ready for. And then we canceled. Not because she didn’t need surgery. Not because it wasn’t medically necessary. But because the hospital said they won’t get paid without prior authorization. This is the system we’ve learned to work inside, one that denies and delays care for administrative reasons. A system where responsibility is spread everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Where having insurance doesn’t guarantee you’ll get the care you need. Where paperwork can matter more than a patient sitting in a hospital bed. Prior authorization reform may be announced, but on the front lines, it’s not what we’re seeing. Today, a cancer surgery was canceled because the system is designed to protect payment…not people.
0:43

This is happening more than people realize. A woman fighting breast cancer showed up for surgery today…fresh off of chemo, port in place, nothing to eat or drink, mentally preparing for the thing no one can ever truly be ready for. And then we canceled. Not because she didn’t need surgery. Not because it wasn’t medically necessary. But because the hospital said they won’t get paid without prior authorization. This is the system we’ve learned to work inside, one that denies and delays care for administrative reasons. A system where responsibility is spread everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Where having insurance doesn’t guarantee you’ll get the care you need. Where paperwork can matter more than a patient sitting in a hospital bed. Prior authorization reform may be announced, but on the front lines, it’s not what we’re seeing. Today, a cancer surgery was canceled because the system is designed to protect payment…not people.

Elisabeth Potter MD

324,479 次观看 • 4 个月前

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”
2:35

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 次观看 • 1 年前

Cardiologist wins 3rd place at Anthropic's hackathon. Out of 13,000 applications. Built in 7 days by Michał Nedoszytko MD. Coded day and night - in the hospital, in the cloud, while flying from Brussels to San Francisco. A few years ago, it would have been impossible for a doctor to build this alone in just a couple of days. AI changed that. The project is called It is an AI agentic care platform for patients. Including reverse AI scribe it is a companion that guides the patient from the moment they leave the doctor's office. Powered by the massive context window of Opus 4.6, it allows patients to explore their full medical history, connected devices, Evidence Based resources and external data sources — all in one place. Today, the barrier to entry has vanished; even a practicing physician can build an application from scratch.
2:59

Cardiologist wins 3rd place at Anthropic's hackathon. Out of 13,000 applications. Built in 7 days by Michał Nedoszytko MD. Coded day and night - in the hospital, in the cloud, while flying from Brussels to San Francisco. A few years ago, it would have been impossible for a doctor to build this alone in just a couple of days. AI changed that. The project is called It is an AI agentic care platform for patients. Including reverse AI scribe it is a companion that guides the patient from the moment they leave the doctor's office. Powered by the massive context window of Opus 4.6, it allows patients to explore their full medical history, connected devices, Evidence Based resources and external data sources — all in one place. Today, the barrier to entry has vanished; even a practicing physician can build an application from scratch.

Michał Podlewski

3,592,050 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 If You Live In America Listen To This: American Nurse For 15 Years Is Whistleblowing On New Policy In Urgent Cares “Needs to go viral, urgent cares are becoming one of the most dangerous places in the US health care system, and I'm about to tell you why. Hi. My name is Lindsey. I've been a nurse for the last 10 years and a nurse practitioner for the last 5 years, and I'm here to spill the tea: So many urgent cares are going towards a policy, which is that regardless of what medical condition a patient comes in with, that they need to be checked in and triaged and evaluated by the provider, which sounds great in theory, but let me paint you a picture. Say, an older gentleman walks in with confusion, slurred speech, and facial drooping on one side. Normally, the front staff would notify me, hey. We think this patient is possibly having a stroke. Can you come and take a look? I would go up to them. I'd say, hey. I'm really concerned for you. Let me call 911 so you can get to the ER and get the care that you need that an urgent care can't provide. But instead, this policy binds a provider's hands. So the nurse practitioner, doctor, or PA who is there at that urgent care is unable to do so. They are now requiring that they are checked in, triaged, and evaluated by them before they're sent to the ER, even though the provider already knows they're going to the ER. The problem is this patient could be sitting there waiting for 30, 40, 50 minutes or longer because that provider may be with another patient doing a laceration pair or an IED, which is completely appropriate and completely treatable in urgent care. But in the meantime, the clock is ticking, and this patient is literally losing minutes on what is the difference between possibly life and death and good outcomes and bad outcomes. And this all stems from the fact that health care administrators and their corporate greed has grown so large that they care more about a yacht than they do about caring for patients in the way that they should be cared for. Because this policy is about ensuring that they get the money from that patient going into the urgent care as opposed to the patient being transferred to a place where they can be treated appropriately. So be careful out there, y'all. If you have something like, you know, stroke symptoms, chest pain, or severe abdominal pain, please don't waste your time nor give your money to the corporate greedy buzzards who are more interested in filling their pocket than they are helping you and making sure you or your loved one gets the care that they deserve.”
1:55

🚨 If You Live In America Listen To This: American Nurse For 15 Years Is Whistleblowing On New Policy In Urgent Cares “Needs to go viral, urgent cares are becoming one of the most dangerous places in the US health care system, and I'm about to tell you why. Hi. My name is Lindsey. I've been a nurse for the last 10 years and a nurse practitioner for the last 5 years, and I'm here to spill the tea: So many urgent cares are going towards a policy, which is that regardless of what medical condition a patient comes in with, that they need to be checked in and triaged and evaluated by the provider, which sounds great in theory, but let me paint you a picture. Say, an older gentleman walks in with confusion, slurred speech, and facial drooping on one side. Normally, the front staff would notify me, hey. We think this patient is possibly having a stroke. Can you come and take a look? I would go up to them. I'd say, hey. I'm really concerned for you. Let me call 911 so you can get to the ER and get the care that you need that an urgent care can't provide. But instead, this policy binds a provider's hands. So the nurse practitioner, doctor, or PA who is there at that urgent care is unable to do so. They are now requiring that they are checked in, triaged, and evaluated by them before they're sent to the ER, even though the provider already knows they're going to the ER. The problem is this patient could be sitting there waiting for 30, 40, 50 minutes or longer because that provider may be with another patient doing a laceration pair or an IED, which is completely appropriate and completely treatable in urgent care. But in the meantime, the clock is ticking, and this patient is literally losing minutes on what is the difference between possibly life and death and good outcomes and bad outcomes. And this all stems from the fact that health care administrators and their corporate greed has grown so large that they care more about a yacht than they do about caring for patients in the way that they should be cared for. Because this policy is about ensuring that they get the money from that patient going into the urgent care as opposed to the patient being transferred to a place where they can be treated appropriately. So be careful out there, y'all. If you have something like, you know, stroke symptoms, chest pain, or severe abdominal pain, please don't waste your time nor give your money to the corporate greedy buzzards who are more interested in filling their pocket than they are helping you and making sure you or your loved one gets the care that they deserve.”

Wall Street Apes

1,891,157 次观看 • 2 年前

The NHS’s Federated Data Platform (FDP) - which is powered by Palantir - can feel complicated. But if you want a simple explanation of how it is transforming the lives of clinicians and patients, I’d urge you to watch this short video from NHS England. NHS trusts across England use the FDP to pull together data from different IT systems. This helps to improve patient care, while cutting the administrative work for NHS staff. Each year, more than two million people in England navigate the difficult journey of cancer diagnosis, testing and treatment. That’s why we’ve introduced the Cancer 360 tool, built on the #FDP, to speed up this process. It cuts down paper work, tracks progress, prevents delays and helps to create personalised treatment plans - so nothing important gets missed. Without this system, #NHS staff are stuck pulling together information from multiple systems, spreadsheets and emails - taking up valuable time that could be spent on patient care. We are incredibly proud of the difference this software is making to the NHS and are incredibly excited about what’s coming next. $PLTR #PLTR
1:15

The NHS’s Federated Data Platform (FDP) - which is powered by Palantir - can feel complicated. But if you want a simple explanation of how it is transforming the lives of clinicians and patients, I’d urge you to watch this short video from NHS England. NHS trusts across England use the FDP to pull together data from different IT systems. This helps to improve patient care, while cutting the administrative work for NHS staff. Each year, more than two million people in England navigate the difficult journey of cancer diagnosis, testing and treatment. That’s why we’ve introduced the Cancer 360 tool, built on the #FDP, to speed up this process. It cuts down paper work, tracks progress, prevents delays and helps to create personalised treatment plans - so nothing important gets missed. Without this system, #NHS staff are stuck pulling together information from multiple systems, spreadsheets and emails - taking up valuable time that could be spent on patient care. We are incredibly proud of the difference this software is making to the NHS and are incredibly excited about what’s coming next. $PLTR #PLTR

Louis Mosley

52,452 次观看 • 1 年前

This woman is a Board Certified Emergency Medicine Physician in America She says she’s seeing more and more doctors leave practicing medicine because what US Health Insurance companies are doing to healthcare She explains why, this is important information: “I believe what we are seeing with healthcare professionals is not just burnout, it's something far more insidious and painful. This is moral injury. — Moral injury. The pain of knowing what the right thing is for the patient, but being unable to do that because of systemic barriers. And over time, this wears you down. I have seen so many people leave the profession because it has eroded their sense of purpose, their love for the job. And we take a Hippocratic oath to do no harm. But in a system that doesn't place human health at the center, that becomes harder and harder to uphold. And that disconnect from what we are trained to do, from what we can actually do, creates a very painful wound. And when the healers themselves are wounded, when their hands are tied, when their clinical judgment is overruled, they don't just feel that defeat themselves, they that trickles down to the patient. — So when we see our providers juggling insurance company protocols, productivity metrics, hospital bureaucracy, the relentless pull of the electronic medical record, all of these things take the doctor away, the patient. If we really want to understand why the United States spends more on health care than any other nation, while delivering some of the worst outcomes, we need to start being honest. The system just isn't inefficient. It is deeply misaligned with care and having it be patient first” US Health Insurance companies are absolutely destroying American Healthcare and we all must keep sharing these important stories because something has to change
3:20

This woman is a Board Certified Emergency Medicine Physician in America She says she’s seeing more and more doctors leave practicing medicine because what US Health Insurance companies are doing to healthcare She explains why, this is important information: “I believe what we are seeing with healthcare professionals is not just burnout, it's something far more insidious and painful. This is moral injury. — Moral injury. The pain of knowing what the right thing is for the patient, but being unable to do that because of systemic barriers. And over time, this wears you down. I have seen so many people leave the profession because it has eroded their sense of purpose, their love for the job. And we take a Hippocratic oath to do no harm. But in a system that doesn't place human health at the center, that becomes harder and harder to uphold. And that disconnect from what we are trained to do, from what we can actually do, creates a very painful wound. And when the healers themselves are wounded, when their hands are tied, when their clinical judgment is overruled, they don't just feel that defeat themselves, they that trickles down to the patient. — So when we see our providers juggling insurance company protocols, productivity metrics, hospital bureaucracy, the relentless pull of the electronic medical record, all of these things take the doctor away, the patient. If we really want to understand why the United States spends more on health care than any other nation, while delivering some of the worst outcomes, we need to start being honest. The system just isn't inefficient. It is deeply misaligned with care and having it be patient first” US Health Insurance companies are absolutely destroying American Healthcare and we all must keep sharing these important stories because something has to change

Wall Street Apes

223,295 次观看 • 1 年前

32/800 marks. Just 4%. And this candidate is doing MD Anaesthesia in J&K, a branch linked directly with critical care and life-saving decisions. This is not a joke anymore. This is the collapse of merit, accountability and public trust in the healthcare system. Lakhs of deserving students sacrifice years of their lives for these exams, only to watch the system reward mediocrity while punishing hard work. When a patient enters an operation theatre, they don’t ask for category, politics or vote banks. They pray for competence. Healthcare cannot survive on compromises. The public deserves qualified, capable doctors. Enough is enough. #Savemerit
2:28

32/800 marks. Just 4%. And this candidate is doing MD Anaesthesia in J&K, a branch linked directly with critical care and life-saving decisions. This is not a joke anymore. This is the collapse of merit, accountability and public trust in the healthcare system. Lakhs of deserving students sacrifice years of their lives for these exams, only to watch the system reward mediocrity while punishing hard work. When a patient enters an operation theatre, they don’t ask for category, politics or vote banks. They pray for competence. Healthcare cannot survive on compromises. The public deserves qualified, capable doctors. Enough is enough. #Savemerit

Sahil Parray

25,247 次观看 • 2 个月前

A coin built to be completely private and untouchable just lost half its value in 48 hours because of a crack it didn’t know it had. for FOUR years and an AI is the one that found it imagine the most secure private vault in the world. now imagine finding out there’s been a hole in it the whole time and because it’s private, you can never prove if anyone used it… that’s Zcash. that’s this week. but here’s why everyone should care: the smartest humans missed this bug for 4 years. AI found it instantly. today AI is finding cracks to fix them. tomorrow the same tools find cracks to use them. your bank. your data. every system humans built. AI can now find the weak points faster than we can protect them. a privacy coin was just the first to break in public. it won’t be the last
2:58

A coin built to be completely private and untouchable just lost half its value in 48 hours because of a crack it didn’t know it had. for FOUR years and an AI is the one that found it imagine the most secure private vault in the world. now imagine finding out there’s been a hole in it the whole time and because it’s private, you can never prove if anyone used it… that’s Zcash. that’s this week. but here’s why everyone should care: the smartest humans missed this bug for 4 years. AI found it instantly. today AI is finding cracks to fix them. tomorrow the same tools find cracks to use them. your bank. your data. every system humans built. AI can now find the weak points faster than we can protect them. a privacy coin was just the first to break in public. it won’t be the last

Mika

21,093 次观看 • 1 个月前

Linda Peeno is an American physician known for being a whistleblower against the American managed healthcare industry where she gave Congress a confession that she was forced to deny a patient a life saving operation because it saved the insurance company that she worked for, $500,000. She was coerced by the financial architecture of the managed care system into denying a dying man a life saving operation, a denial that killed him and saved her employer, Humana. The investigation was swept under the rug and she was promoted, given an escalating 6 figure salary, and praised as an exemplary medical director. The system refused to punish her for letting a man die and it rewarded her for it instead. If the most honest case of how managed care operates in America had to come from a single physician's congressional confession rather than a federal investigation, what does that tell you about every death that never got a confession and was swept under the rug, especially all the Crimes Against Humanity committed during Covid-19 that we watched and reported on in real time, while they censored us for telling the truth?
1:24

Linda Peeno is an American physician known for being a whistleblower against the American managed healthcare industry where she gave Congress a confession that she was forced to deny a patient a life saving operation because it saved the insurance company that she worked for, $500,000. She was coerced by the financial architecture of the managed care system into denying a dying man a life saving operation, a denial that killed him and saved her employer, Humana. The investigation was swept under the rug and she was promoted, given an escalating 6 figure salary, and praised as an exemplary medical director. The system refused to punish her for letting a man die and it rewarded her for it instead. If the most honest case of how managed care operates in America had to come from a single physician's congressional confession rather than a federal investigation, what does that tell you about every death that never got a confession and was swept under the rug, especially all the Crimes Against Humanity committed during Covid-19 that we watched and reported on in real time, while they censored us for telling the truth?

Bridgett Fertig

11,800 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gary Brecka just revealed a disturbing study about the American medical system. A 2016 Harvard study found that medical error is the 3rd leading cause of death. Hopkins confirmed the same finding in 2019. Brecka believes it's because the system forces doctors to misdiagnose you. Every doctor has to assign your condition a diagnostic code to get reimbursed. No code, no payment. If your actual condition doesn't fit neatly into an existing code, the doctor picks the closest billable option. • Your treatment follows from that code • Your medication follows from that code • Your entire care plan is built on a diagnosis that was chosen because the system would pay for it Brecka gave an example. A patient comes in with symptoms caused by a nutrient deficiency. • There's no reimbursement code for that • There's no payment for telling someone to change their diet So the doctor slots them into the nearest diagnosis the system accepts and prescribes accordingly. The third leading cause of death in America isn't bad doctors. It's a billing system that was designed to get paid, not to get it right. — Gary Brecka (Gary Brecka) on Joe Rogan Experience #2304 (Joe Rogan Podcast News)
1:46

Gary Brecka just revealed a disturbing study about the American medical system. A 2016 Harvard study found that medical error is the 3rd leading cause of death. Hopkins confirmed the same finding in 2019. Brecka believes it's because the system forces doctors to misdiagnose you. Every doctor has to assign your condition a diagnostic code to get reimbursed. No code, no payment. If your actual condition doesn't fit neatly into an existing code, the doctor picks the closest billable option. • Your treatment follows from that code • Your medication follows from that code • Your entire care plan is built on a diagnosis that was chosen because the system would pay for it Brecka gave an example. A patient comes in with symptoms caused by a nutrient deficiency. • There's no reimbursement code for that • There's no payment for telling someone to change their diet So the doctor slots them into the nearest diagnosis the system accepts and prescribes accordingly. The third leading cause of death in America isn't bad doctors. It's a billing system that was designed to get paid, not to get it right. — Gary Brecka (Gary Brecka) on Joe Rogan Experience #2304 (Joe Rogan Podcast News)

Goku

21,774 次观看 • 3 个月前

i just cracked the code on ai digital products... every product costs $0 to build and takes under 2 minutes to make. i built an ai agent that turns any niche into a ready-to-export digital product in whatever format you want, pdf, notion template, ebook, guide, you name it. drop in your niche and one problem. the system analyzes demand, maps buyer desires, builds you the full product, and you watch it happen in real time. then the agent gives you the path, what to do next, rates each module, edits everything, practically sells it for you. you just follow it. i'm making full end-to-end products in under 2 minutes with this system. so i packaged the whole thing up. you're getting an ai that: - picks your niche - calculates demand - builds the product in any format - gives you the selling blueprint to go with it. rt + reply "product" and i'll show you how to access (must be following so i can dm)
0:29

i just cracked the code on ai digital products... every product costs $0 to build and takes under 2 minutes to make. i built an ai agent that turns any niche into a ready-to-export digital product in whatever format you want, pdf, notion template, ebook, guide, you name it. drop in your niche and one problem. the system analyzes demand, maps buyer desires, builds you the full product, and you watch it happen in real time. then the agent gives you the path, what to do next, rates each module, edits everything, practically sells it for you. you just follow it. i'm making full end-to-end products in under 2 minutes with this system. so i packaged the whole thing up. you're getting an ai that: - picks your niche - calculates demand - builds the product in any format - gives you the selling blueprint to go with it. rt + reply "product" and i'll show you how to access (must be following so i can dm)

MONTE

14,986 次观看 • 12 天前

When Doctors Say “Finish the Job”: Inside Canada’s Assisted Dying Horror Stories Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying program isn’t just “end-of-life care.” It’s the state giving doctors the power to end a life. The record now shows how often that power is being abused. Postmortem reviews in Ontario alone have flagged over 400 cases where MAiD rules were ignored, including people who didn’t meet the legal criteria but were still nudged, steered, or outright pushed toward euthanasia. Kelsi Sheren recounts one especially horrifying case where a doctor told staff to “finish the job” while the patient was still conscious, a moment that sounds less like compassionate care and more like a system that has forgotten what medicine is for. As Western governments rush to expand assisted dying, what does this say about how little value they place on vulnerable lives, and about the future of healthcare in a culture that finds it easier to end suffering by ending the sufferer?
3:41

When Doctors Say “Finish the Job”: Inside Canada’s Assisted Dying Horror Stories Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying program isn’t just “end-of-life care.” It’s the state giving doctors the power to end a life. The record now shows how often that power is being abused. Postmortem reviews in Ontario alone have flagged over 400 cases where MAiD rules were ignored, including people who didn’t meet the legal criteria but were still nudged, steered, or outright pushed toward euthanasia. Kelsi Sheren recounts one especially horrifying case where a doctor told staff to “finish the job” while the patient was still conscious, a moment that sounds less like compassionate care and more like a system that has forgotten what medicine is for. As Western governments rush to expand assisted dying, what does this say about how little value they place on vulnerable lives, and about the future of healthcare in a culture that finds it easier to end suffering by ending the sufferer?

Redacted

16,511 次观看 • 21 天前

One of the most challenging parts of being a physician on call during the holidays is finding the balance between practicing evidence-based medicine and helping patients achieve what matters most to them—especially when those goals involve spending cherished moments with their loved ones. For some patients, this may be their last holiday with family, and we do everything we can to honor their wishes while ensuring they receive the best care possible. Whether it’s attending a special event, participating in a beloved tradition, or simply being home with family, every patient’s goals and priorities are unique. Deciding whether to discharge someone early, delay chemotherapy to minimize side effects during the holidays, or prioritize comfort over the ‘standard of care’ is never straightforward. This is where the art of medicine comes in—collaborating with patients to find a path forward that respects their goals while delivering compassionate, high-quality care. It’s a process that hinges on trust and open, honest communication. As physicians, we work to create a space where patients feel heard, valued, and empowered to take part in the decision-making process. Medicine is about more than just treatments; it’s about people. And during the holidays, that truth resonates even more deeply. Take the time to talk to your doctor, share your goals, and ask questions. Trust and connection are at the core of great care. 💙 #HolidayCare #ArtOfMedicine #CompassionateCare #PatientCenteredCare #WomenInMedicine #WIMStrongerTogether #PhysicianLife
0:23

One of the most challenging parts of being a physician on call during the holidays is finding the balance between practicing evidence-based medicine and helping patients achieve what matters most to them—especially when those goals involve spending cherished moments with their loved ones. For some patients, this may be their last holiday with family, and we do everything we can to honor their wishes while ensuring they receive the best care possible. Whether it’s attending a special event, participating in a beloved tradition, or simply being home with family, every patient’s goals and priorities are unique. Deciding whether to discharge someone early, delay chemotherapy to minimize side effects during the holidays, or prioritize comfort over the ‘standard of care’ is never straightforward. This is where the art of medicine comes in—collaborating with patients to find a path forward that respects their goals while delivering compassionate, high-quality care. It’s a process that hinges on trust and open, honest communication. As physicians, we work to create a space where patients feel heard, valued, and empowered to take part in the decision-making process. Medicine is about more than just treatments; it’s about people. And during the holidays, that truth resonates even more deeply. Take the time to talk to your doctor, share your goals, and ask questions. Trust and connection are at the core of great care. 💙 #HolidayCare #ArtOfMedicine #CompassionateCare #PatientCenteredCare #WomenInMedicine #WIMStrongerTogether #PhysicianLife

Shikha Jain MD, FACP

31,382 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Canada Effective April 1st 2024: NEW Continuing Care Regulation “Moving to 0 hours of care” Caregiver in tears: “So that means in a continuing care home, someone can be left for a week sitting in their own fecal matter and that's just okay now because it is now not the nurse's job to actually care for their patient.” “New rules do not prescribe how many hours of care residents of a facility should receive.” “The vulnerable in our world are supposed to be taken care of, and now the government is making it so that isn't even a thing anymore. We're going back in f****** time instead of forward, and I'm just baffled by this. How can you go to school and become a nurse and not give a **** about the people you're taking care of. There's already so many terrible nurses in the medical industry that try to get away with doing the bare minimum so that they keep their job. And now the government is telling them, you don't even have to do the bare minimum to keep your f***** job. It is now lawfully backed that you do what? The fuck is the point of a care home and a continuing care facility if they're not going to have assistance. This is f***** wild. Basically, now what this means is if you have not set yourself up for retirement, which the majority of the population has not because who are we f****** kidding? In this day and age, it's hard enough to put milk and eggs in everyone's fridges. It means that you're not gonna it's not funded. You're not gonna get the help that you need. You're not gonna have the products you need. You're not gonna have the care you need. They literally sent a patient who had a stroke to recover alone in a hospital or sorry, in a hotel in Leduc. Someone who had a stroke was sent to recover alone in a hotel in Leduc. I give up on this world. I didn't think it could get worse.” More information: “Care standards at continuing care facilities to be eliminated, say nurses and NDP - New Continuing Care Act Regulations coming into effect April 1” Alberta’s nurses warn that new provincial regulations will eliminate any legal requirement for continuing care operators to provide nursing care to residents. Last month, the province published a new Continuing Care Act Regulations that are supposed to take effect on April 1. The regulations do not mention a minimum number of required hours of nursing care. “We are moving to zero hours of care. This is extremely dangerous,” said Heather Smith, United Nurses of Alberta president, in a statement. Smith said while that was clearly inadequate, at least there was a minimum legal standard.” United Nurses of Alberta Says “New regulations eliminate all nursing care requirements for residents of continuing care homes in Alberta”
2:58

🚨 Canada Effective April 1st 2024: NEW Continuing Care Regulation “Moving to 0 hours of care” Caregiver in tears: “So that means in a continuing care home, someone can be left for a week sitting in their own fecal matter and that's just okay now because it is now not the nurse's job to actually care for their patient.” “New rules do not prescribe how many hours of care residents of a facility should receive.” “The vulnerable in our world are supposed to be taken care of, and now the government is making it so that isn't even a thing anymore. We're going back in f****** time instead of forward, and I'm just baffled by this. How can you go to school and become a nurse and not give a **** about the people you're taking care of. There's already so many terrible nurses in the medical industry that try to get away with doing the bare minimum so that they keep their job. And now the government is telling them, you don't even have to do the bare minimum to keep your f***** job. It is now lawfully backed that you do what? The fuck is the point of a care home and a continuing care facility if they're not going to have assistance. This is f***** wild. Basically, now what this means is if you have not set yourself up for retirement, which the majority of the population has not because who are we f****** kidding? In this day and age, it's hard enough to put milk and eggs in everyone's fridges. It means that you're not gonna it's not funded. You're not gonna get the help that you need. You're not gonna have the products you need. You're not gonna have the care you need. They literally sent a patient who had a stroke to recover alone in a hospital or sorry, in a hotel in Leduc. Someone who had a stroke was sent to recover alone in a hotel in Leduc. I give up on this world. I didn't think it could get worse.” More information: “Care standards at continuing care facilities to be eliminated, say nurses and NDP - New Continuing Care Act Regulations coming into effect April 1” Alberta’s nurses warn that new provincial regulations will eliminate any legal requirement for continuing care operators to provide nursing care to residents. Last month, the province published a new Continuing Care Act Regulations that are supposed to take effect on April 1. The regulations do not mention a minimum number of required hours of nursing care. “We are moving to zero hours of care. This is extremely dangerous,” said Heather Smith, United Nurses of Alberta president, in a statement. Smith said while that was clearly inadequate, at least there was a minimum legal standard.” United Nurses of Alberta Says “New regulations eliminate all nursing care requirements for residents of continuing care homes in Alberta”

Wall Street Apes

2,763,392 次观看 • 2 年前

It is vital that what happened to my daughter Paloma is properly and independently investigated, not only for her sake but because the clinicians involved continue to work in frontline, high-risk roles including anaesthesia, intensive care, air ambulance medicine, and medical training. Where sworn evidence, drug charts, observation data, and imaging raise serious questions about excessive dosing of paralysing agents, failure to recognise classic signs of adrenaline-related pulmonary oedema, and delays or inconsistencies in clinical decision-making, the issue is no longer private or historical. It becomes a matter of public safety. Patients are entitled to expect that doctors administering powerful drugs such as adrenaline and rocuronium understand their effects, recognise deterioration when it occurs, and act promptly to correct it. If those standards were not met here, and if that has not been transparently examined, then the public may remain at risk. This is why scrutiny, accountability, and full investigation are not optional, and why this matter is plainly in the public interest.
12:55

It is vital that what happened to my daughter Paloma is properly and independently investigated, not only for her sake but because the clinicians involved continue to work in frontline, high-risk roles including anaesthesia, intensive care, air ambulance medicine, and medical training. Where sworn evidence, drug charts, observation data, and imaging raise serious questions about excessive dosing of paralysing agents, failure to recognise classic signs of adrenaline-related pulmonary oedema, and delays or inconsistencies in clinical decision-making, the issue is no longer private or historical. It becomes a matter of public safety. Patients are entitled to expect that doctors administering powerful drugs such as adrenaline and rocuronium understand their effects, recognise deterioration when it occurs, and act promptly to correct it. If those standards were not met here, and if that has not been transparently examined, then the public may remain at risk. This is why scrutiny, accountability, and full investigation are not optional, and why this matter is plainly in the public interest.

Kate Shemirani

24,117 次观看 • 5 个月前

SITUATION EXPLAINED: What happens to open source when the US restricts access to frontier AI models? We asked Adrian Dittmann: "China is releasing these models [open source] to gain international dominance, people will work on these things and say, 'Hey, maybe I can contribute to this if it's open source.' This is the thing that actually gets them talent." "If you're not allowed into the next GPT release or you're not allowed to use Fable, then what are you gonna do? You're stuck with the existing stuff, or you will have to use an open source model that might have subtly better capabilities." "The United States will catch up to open source in some form as well. They seem to just be maximizing product creation." "The problem with open source models is you have to be kind of a nerd in order to use them properly. Consumer facing, the effects will be minimal because the average person doesn't care about open source models. They only care whether or not they can do a quick search with Gemini or ChatGPT."
2:32

SITUATION EXPLAINED: What happens to open source when the US restricts access to frontier AI models? We asked Adrian Dittmann: "China is releasing these models [open source] to gain international dominance, people will work on these things and say, 'Hey, maybe I can contribute to this if it's open source.' This is the thing that actually gets them talent." "If you're not allowed into the next GPT release or you're not allowed to use Fable, then what are you gonna do? You're stuck with the existing stuff, or you will have to use an open source model that might have subtly better capabilities." "The United States will catch up to open source in some form as well. They seem to just be maximizing product creation." "The problem with open source models is you have to be kind of a nerd in order to use them properly. Consumer facing, the effects will be minimal because the average person doesn't care about open source models. They only care whether or not they can do a quick search with Gemini or ChatGPT."

MTS

14,406 次观看 • 1 个月前

After the last call, my nurse practitioner Whitney and I processed how ridiculous it is that the person scheduled to speak with me, reviewing the careful documentation and clinical notes, was not a plastic surgeon. We fight for our patients and work so hard, but also see the absurdity and talk about it in real time. Then we keep going. My patient has done everything right and we can help her at @redbudsurgerycenter. But instead, we have to jump through hoops and wait. Because the system rewards delay. Every extra step—peer-to-peer calls, appeals, reviews—adds friction. And friction means fewer patients actually get care. Which is a good thing for the insurance company’s bottom line. This is what we’re seeing over and over again.
1:13

After the last call, my nurse practitioner Whitney and I processed how ridiculous it is that the person scheduled to speak with me, reviewing the careful documentation and clinical notes, was not a plastic surgeon. We fight for our patients and work so hard, but also see the absurdity and talk about it in real time. Then we keep going. My patient has done everything right and we can help her at @redbudsurgerycenter. But instead, we have to jump through hoops and wait. Because the system rewards delay. Every extra step—peer-to-peer calls, appeals, reviews—adds friction. And friction means fewer patients actually get care. Which is a good thing for the insurance company’s bottom line. This is what we’re seeing over and over again.

Elisabeth Potter MD

17,628 次观看 • 3 个月前