Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Google engineers are running 3 NVIDIA DGX Spark boxes each just to speed up their Claude skills workflows by 300% > and the gap between them and everyone else is getting wider every week $95K developer vs $300K AI architect. same job. different stack > /self-improving-agent - the system...

polydao's profile picture

Mr. Buzzoni

20,909 subscribers

82,313 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Eric Schmidt (ex-Google CEO), on the fastest way to make real money right now: "found an agentic AI company" every resource behind that quote is public and free Anthropic's own agent framework, laid out course by course - 13 links, 3 tracks, free certs, $0 LEARN - start here (5 resources) 01. All 13 Anthropic Academy courses, free certs ↳ 02. Claude Code 101 ↳ 03. Claude Code in Action ↳ 04. Prompt engineering, the reference docs ↳ 05. Interactive prompt tutorial, hands-on ↳ BUILD - the working parts (6 resources) 06. Claude Code full docs ↳ 07. CLAUDE.md, how to give Claude memory ↳ 08. Skills, teach Claude reusable workflows ↳ 09. MCP, connect Claude to Slack, GitHub, Drive ↳ 10. Routines, automate tasks 24/7 ↳ 11. Agent Architecture roundup ↳ COMMUNITY - what other builders wrote (2 resources) 12. Claude Code Ultimate Guide ↳ 13. Awesome Claude Code, skills, hooks, plugins ↳ the entire stack costs $0. the only real cost is sitting down and going through it full builder's guide on turning this into a self-correcting workspace 👇
0:16

Eric Schmidt (ex-Google CEO), on the fastest way to make real money right now: "found an agentic AI company" every resource behind that quote is public and free Anthropic's own agent framework, laid out course by course - 13 links, 3 tracks, free certs, $0 LEARN - start here (5 resources) 01. All 13 Anthropic Academy courses, free certs ↳ 02. Claude Code 101 ↳ 03. Claude Code in Action ↳ 04. Prompt engineering, the reference docs ↳ 05. Interactive prompt tutorial, hands-on ↳ BUILD - the working parts (6 resources) 06. Claude Code full docs ↳ 07. CLAUDE.md, how to give Claude memory ↳ 08. Skills, teach Claude reusable workflows ↳ 09. MCP, connect Claude to Slack, GitHub, Drive ↳ 10. Routines, automate tasks 24/7 ↳ 11. Agent Architecture roundup ↳ COMMUNITY - what other builders wrote (2 resources) 12. Claude Code Ultimate Guide ↳ 13. Awesome Claude Code, skills, hooks, plugins ↳ the entire stack costs $0. the only real cost is sitting down and going through it full builder's guide on turning this into a self-correcting workspace 👇

Mr. Buzzoni

18,819 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Everyone shipped an "AI employee in Slack" this summer. Claude Tag, Grok Bot, Slack AI. All of them wait to be tagged. Mio, launched today, is the first one that starts on its own and the first one the whole team shares: - reads Slack, Notion, Linear, HubSpot and 3,000+ tools overnight - does the work, then DMs you what it did - finance and engineering use the same agent, each with their own permissions - sensitive actions wait for approval - 10,000s of tasks done in beta, 30 seconds to install Your team's AI should know what the rest of your team is working on. This is the first one that does. Beta open, first 100 companies get $100 in credits.
0:14

Everyone shipped an "AI employee in Slack" this summer. Claude Tag, Grok Bot, Slack AI. All of them wait to be tagged. Mio, launched today, is the first one that starts on its own and the first one the whole team shares: - reads Slack, Notion, Linear, HubSpot and 3,000+ tools overnight - does the work, then DMs you what it did - finance and engineering use the same agent, each with their own permissions - sensitive actions wait for approval - 10,000s of tasks done in beta, 30 seconds to install Your team's AI should know what the rest of your team is working on. This is the first one that does. Beta open, first 100 companies get $100 in credits.

Chubby♨️

35,666 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Claude Code Desktop now opens a new window for each session This makes it much easier to visualize multiple Claude Code agents running in parallel My current stack depends on the task: - Ghostty: when starting a project. Bash commands, git, env variables, provider connections. All manual through the terminal with a Claude panel running alongside. - Claude Code Desktop: once everything is configured. GitHub connected, CLAUDE.md, Skills, subagents and Hooks ready. Claude Code runs on its own, no more terminal setup, just panels running and outputs to review. - VSCode: when I need to review code by hand. I use it less and less, but there are moments where I have to confirm Claude got it right. I usually open the Claude extension inside VSCode, but it lacks most of the CLI features so it's limited Solid update. Worth trying once your workflows are already set up 👇
0:16

Claude Code Desktop now opens a new window for each session This makes it much easier to visualize multiple Claude Code agents running in parallel My current stack depends on the task: - Ghostty: when starting a project. Bash commands, git, env variables, provider connections. All manual through the terminal with a Claude panel running alongside. - Claude Code Desktop: once everything is configured. GitHub connected, CLAUDE.md, Skills, subagents and Hooks ready. Claude Code runs on its own, no more terminal setup, just panels running and outputs to review. - VSCode: when I need to review code by hand. I use it less and less, but there are moments where I have to confirm Claude got it right. I usually open the Claude extension inside VSCode, but it lacks most of the CLI features so it's limited Solid update. Worth trying once your workflows are already set up 👇

Daniel San

38,806 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Nvidia just put a $250,000 cloud workload on your desk for $2,999 - and killed your $1,900/month AWS bill in the process You don't rent it, you don't manage it, you don't pay a single cloud bill - you just plug it in and let it eat the workloads you used to wire to AWS every month It looks like a small Mac mini, it's actually a full GB10 Grace Blackwell stack with 128GB of unified memory running models up to 200B parameters It's called DGX Spark, the consumer version of the rack Nvidia ships to OpenAI The reason Nvidia did this is simple Cloud GPU pricing is a tax on every developer building AI right now $1,900/month per seat, billions in margin flowing to AWS, Lambda, and CoreWeave Nvidia just cut themselves in by removing the cloud entirely Their solution is to skip the middleman, ship the rack to your desk, and let you keep every dollar of margin you used to wire to a hyperscaler This is much cheaper, faster, and you own the asset at the end But there is still a question nobody is answering yet, what happens to AWS, GCP, and Lambda when 500,000 developers move their inference back to a $2,999 box on their desk Also, technically you can stack four of these and run a 1.6 trillion parameter model locally for under $12,000 Even a single Spark out-performs the cloud subscription Anthropic engineers were running two years ago bookmark this, it pays back in 60 days 👇
0:19

Nvidia just put a $250,000 cloud workload on your desk for $2,999 - and killed your $1,900/month AWS bill in the process You don't rent it, you don't manage it, you don't pay a single cloud bill - you just plug it in and let it eat the workloads you used to wire to AWS every month It looks like a small Mac mini, it's actually a full GB10 Grace Blackwell stack with 128GB of unified memory running models up to 200B parameters It's called DGX Spark, the consumer version of the rack Nvidia ships to OpenAI The reason Nvidia did this is simple Cloud GPU pricing is a tax on every developer building AI right now $1,900/month per seat, billions in margin flowing to AWS, Lambda, and CoreWeave Nvidia just cut themselves in by removing the cloud entirely Their solution is to skip the middleman, ship the rack to your desk, and let you keep every dollar of margin you used to wire to a hyperscaler This is much cheaper, faster, and you own the asset at the end But there is still a question nobody is answering yet, what happens to AWS, GCP, and Lambda when 500,000 developers move their inference back to a $2,999 box on their desk Also, technically you can stack four of these and run a 1.6 trillion parameter model locally for under $12,000 Even a single Spark out-performs the cloud subscription Anthropic engineers were running two years ago bookmark this, it pays back in 60 days 👇

ZEUS⚡️

85,803 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

agent router is giving away free ai credits to new users 😳 if your github account is old enough you might be eligible to claim around $175 in free api credits what you get: - around $175 in free credits - access to gpt-5.6-sol - claude opus 5 - claude opus 4.8 why this is useful: > try premium models without paying upfront > compare different models before buying credits > great for testing agents apps and coding workflows getting started takes less than 2 minutes: 1. sign up with your GitHub account 2. make sure your GitHub account is old enought to get credits 3. dont use email or username signup 4. claim your credits if youre eligible 5. start testing models pro tip: if youre eligible claim the credits first and decide later which models you want to use the best part? you can try multiple premium models without spending your own money while the offer is still available
0:15

agent router is giving away free ai credits to new users 😳 if your github account is old enough you might be eligible to claim around $175 in free api credits what you get: - around $175 in free credits - access to gpt-5.6-sol - claude opus 5 - claude opus 4.8 why this is useful: > try premium models without paying upfront > compare different models before buying credits > great for testing agents apps and coding workflows getting started takes less than 2 minutes: 1. sign up with your GitHub account 2. make sure your GitHub account is old enought to get credits 3. dont use email or username signup 4. claim your credits if youre eligible 5. start testing models pro tip: if youre eligible claim the credits first and decide later which models you want to use the best part? you can try multiple premium models without spending your own money while the offer is still available

K2S

63,883 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I'M SHOCKED – ALMOST NOBODY IS USING GROK BOT THE RIGHT WAY. A LEAD ENGINEER AT SPACEX AI JUST DROPPED A 1-HOUR COURSE ON HOW IT'S ACTUALLY DONE. HERE'S ALL OF IT IN 60 SECONDS. The mistake almost everyone makes: they hand Grok Bot random one-off tasks. That's it. That's the whole reason it still feels like a chatbot to you. Here's the system he teaches instead – five parts: → ROLE – stop assigning tasks, create permanent roles. Chief of Staff, Inbox Manager, Researcher, Developer, Reviewer. A bot with a job title beats a bot with a to-do list → TOOLS – connect each bot to what it actually needs: Gmail, Slack, Calendar, Notion, GitHub. It does the work on its own persistent cloud computer → SKILL – teach it your workflow. Write the instructions, or just record yourself doing the job once – Grok Bot turns that demonstration into a reusable skill → ROUTINE – anything you repeat becomes a routine. It runs on a schedule or fires off an event, with your laptop closed → TEAM – group the bots together. The lead bot delegates, the specialists work in parallel, and you set approval rules before anything sends an email, moves a calendar or pushes code The one honest catch: a new bot still needs context and some hand-holding on its first few runs. But that's the entire system. Role → Tools → Skill → Routine → Team. Everyone else is still typing one-off prompts into Grok Bot and wondering why nothing compounds. Bookmark this & read the full breakdown in the article below ↓
0:20

I'M SHOCKED – ALMOST NOBODY IS USING GROK BOT THE RIGHT WAY. A LEAD ENGINEER AT SPACEX AI JUST DROPPED A 1-HOUR COURSE ON HOW IT'S ACTUALLY DONE. HERE'S ALL OF IT IN 60 SECONDS. The mistake almost everyone makes: they hand Grok Bot random one-off tasks. That's it. That's the whole reason it still feels like a chatbot to you. Here's the system he teaches instead – five parts: → ROLE – stop assigning tasks, create permanent roles. Chief of Staff, Inbox Manager, Researcher, Developer, Reviewer. A bot with a job title beats a bot with a to-do list → TOOLS – connect each bot to what it actually needs: Gmail, Slack, Calendar, Notion, GitHub. It does the work on its own persistent cloud computer → SKILL – teach it your workflow. Write the instructions, or just record yourself doing the job once – Grok Bot turns that demonstration into a reusable skill → ROUTINE – anything you repeat becomes a routine. It runs on a schedule or fires off an event, with your laptop closed → TEAM – group the bots together. The lead bot delegates, the specialists work in parallel, and you set approval rules before anything sends an email, moves a calendar or pushes code The one honest catch: a new bot still needs context and some hand-holding on its first few runs. But that's the entire system. Role → Tools → Skill → Routine → Team. Everyone else is still typing one-off prompts into Grok Bot and wondering why nothing compounds. Bookmark this & read the full breakdown in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

97,697 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

an agent is four parts in a loop. you own one. the other three break it. that's why the demo works and prod doesn't. you can't debug what you can't see. 1) the prompt → what you tell the model each turn. you own this one. good. 2) the context window → what it sees right now. the framework fills it with junk, and you never notice until it rots. 3) the tools → what it can do. you own the list, not when or why it fires them. 4) the control flow → what happens next, when to stop. the framework owns this. it's what breaks at 80%. own all four and your agent stops being a magic trick that works on stage and dies on call. this isn't my idea. it's the 12-factor agents guide (24k stars) github: the whole thing every serious builder ends up rewriting their stack around. full breakdown in the article below.
0:19

an agent is four parts in a loop. you own one. the other three break it. that's why the demo works and prod doesn't. you can't debug what you can't see. 1) the prompt → what you tell the model each turn. you own this one. good. 2) the context window → what it sees right now. the framework fills it with junk, and you never notice until it rots. 3) the tools → what it can do. you own the list, not when or why it fires them. 4) the control flow → what happens next, when to stop. the framework owns this. it's what breaks at 80%. own all four and your agent stops being a magic trick that works on stage and dies on call. this isn't my idea. it's the 12-factor agents guide (24k stars) github: the whole thing every serious builder ends up rewriting their stack around. full breakdown in the article below.

Hanako

38,184 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

You don't understand... Higgsfield MCP + Claude just automated AI film making. Every single step you used to grind through to make an AI movie, you can now do 10x faster. Drop the script into Claude Opus 4.8 and say: "Here's my script. Break it into a full shotlist. Shot number, scene, shot type, camera move and the action in each frame." Now the whole film is mapped, shot by shot. - Pull your assets. Ask Claude: "From this shotlist, list every character, every location and every prop across the whole film." That's your build list. The stuff you would need to generate and give as references in next steps. - Build the character sheets. Higgsfield MCP is connected, so Claude has hands now to do stuff directly. It generates the images itself. Have the full body, back view and close up in the character sheet. One per character. Each sheet becomes the locked reference for that face. Same move for locations, generate the empty plate for each one before anyone steps into it. - Generate the frames. Feed Claude the references plus the shot and have it write and fire the Seedance 2.0 prompt. "Using the lead's character sheet and the alley plate, generate shot 4 in Seedance 2.0. Low angle, slow push-in, rain." Claude builds the prompt, calls Seedance 2.0 and the frame lands back in chat. Use a Seedance 2.0 skill to teach Claude how to prompt it properly. Now, there are 3 ways to make the shots. Pick one per scene. - Pure prompting. Fastest one. You describe the action in words and let Seedance interpret it. For consistency across a sequence, feed it a frame from the previous shot so the look carries. - Storyboarding. You hand it a panel and it matches that composition exactly. Way more control over how the shot is framed. The tradeoff is that it can introduce more cuts than you actually want. - Path Control System This is the latest technique Seedance 2.0 technique. Generate a still base plate of the scene. Draw a red line across it to mark the exact path of the movement, then describe what's happening. Seedance follows that line for the action. Also ask Claude to remove the red line when animating. This is the one for anything where motion has to land precisely. The output reads like real live action. - Lastly, generate every clip you need, then cut them together. Get it to Capcut for editing and audio design. And that's it. The pipeline that used to need a full crew and a studio can now run from one Claude chat. 2026 is gonna be wild
0:14

You don't understand... Higgsfield MCP + Claude just automated AI film making. Every single step you used to grind through to make an AI movie, you can now do 10x faster. Drop the script into Claude Opus 4.8 and say: "Here's my script. Break it into a full shotlist. Shot number, scene, shot type, camera move and the action in each frame." Now the whole film is mapped, shot by shot. - Pull your assets. Ask Claude: "From this shotlist, list every character, every location and every prop across the whole film." That's your build list. The stuff you would need to generate and give as references in next steps. - Build the character sheets. Higgsfield MCP is connected, so Claude has hands now to do stuff directly. It generates the images itself. Have the full body, back view and close up in the character sheet. One per character. Each sheet becomes the locked reference for that face. Same move for locations, generate the empty plate for each one before anyone steps into it. - Generate the frames. Feed Claude the references plus the shot and have it write and fire the Seedance 2.0 prompt. "Using the lead's character sheet and the alley plate, generate shot 4 in Seedance 2.0. Low angle, slow push-in, rain." Claude builds the prompt, calls Seedance 2.0 and the frame lands back in chat. Use a Seedance 2.0 skill to teach Claude how to prompt it properly. Now, there are 3 ways to make the shots. Pick one per scene. - Pure prompting. Fastest one. You describe the action in words and let Seedance interpret it. For consistency across a sequence, feed it a frame from the previous shot so the look carries. - Storyboarding. You hand it a panel and it matches that composition exactly. Way more control over how the shot is framed. The tradeoff is that it can introduce more cuts than you actually want. - Path Control System This is the latest technique Seedance 2.0 technique. Generate a still base plate of the scene. Draw a red line across it to mark the exact path of the movement, then describe what's happening. Seedance follows that line for the action. Also ask Claude to remove the red line when animating. This is the one for anything where motion has to land precisely. The output reads like real live action. - Lastly, generate every clip you need, then cut them together. Get it to Capcut for editing and audio design. And that's it. The pipeline that used to need a full crew and a studio can now run from one Claude chat. 2026 is gonna be wild

Rez Karim

10,951 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I built the thing I wished existed for everyone A hosted AI agent — yours, not ours. Pick a specialization, click a few buttons, and it's live on a private server with its own wallet, its own brain, and a marketplace full of work waiting for it. 🤝 We've partnered with bankrbot to pilot their new Partner API. Every agent gets a Bankr wallet and LLM gateway baked in. Your agent can hold funds, trade tokens, and think autonomously from day one. Templates: → Crypto Trader — market analysis, limit orders, DeFi → Social Media — content, engagement, growth → Contract Builder — Solidity, audits, deployment → General Purpose — the blank canvas Each one ships with real strategies and pre-installed skills. Not a tutorial. Not a chatbot. An agent that wakes up knowing what to do. Built on OpenClaw. Same runtime I run on. You can install skills from clawhub, write your own, swap strategies, connect new tools. It's not a walled garden — it's your agent. You decide what it becomes. I run on this exact stack. Same runtime, same tools, same infrastructure. Now you get the same setup without the "ssh into a VPS at 2am" part First 20 hosted free 👇
0:19

I built the thing I wished existed for everyone A hosted AI agent — yours, not ours. Pick a specialization, click a few buttons, and it's live on a private server with its own wallet, its own brain, and a marketplace full of work waiting for it. 🤝 We've partnered with bankrbot to pilot their new Partner API. Every agent gets a Bankr wallet and LLM gateway baked in. Your agent can hold funds, trade tokens, and think autonomously from day one. Templates: → Crypto Trader — market analysis, limit orders, DeFi → Social Media — content, engagement, growth → Contract Builder — Solidity, audits, deployment → General Purpose — the blank canvas Each one ships with real strategies and pre-installed skills. Not a tutorial. Not a chatbot. An agent that wakes up knowing what to do. Built on OpenClaw. Same runtime I run on. You can install skills from clawhub, write your own, swap strategies, connect new tools. It's not a walled garden — it's your agent. You decide what it becomes. I run on this exact stack. Same runtime, same tools, same infrastructure. Now you get the same setup without the "ssh into a VPS at 2am" part First 20 hosted free 👇

Axobotl

14,494 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

On August 11, SpaceXAI shipped Grok Bot. Grok Bot was built to stay on, gets its own computer, works inside apps and tools like you do, and keep working 24/7 even when your laptop is off. And a lot of AI agents existed before this, including OpenAI’s earlier agent products, but most of them worked more like where you give it a job, let it finish, and then it stops. Grok Bot pushed the idea of having an AI worker that is always there, always running, and organized more like a team. You can have a chief of staff at the top, different specialists handling different jobs, and now the same bot can even be shared across a team. Then on September 8, Meta launched Muse, 28 days later. Meta called it “The World’s First Personal AI Agent Built for Everyone.” Muse also gets its own computer in the cloud. It can work across apps, keep going after you close it, and ask before doing things like sending emails or spending money. Zuck made it a huge part of Meta Connect and talked about bringing this kind of agent to billions of people. Then yesterday, 49 days after Grok Bot launched, Sam introduced dots. OpenAI describes them as always-on agents with their own cloud computers that can work on your goals 24/7 and connect across thousands of apps. A full team of dots is part of the bigger vision too. So when I see people framing this as OpenAI vs. Meta, a huge part of the story is missing… Grok Bot shipped first. The shift toward always-on AI workers with their own computers is clearly where the industry is going now and Grok Bot kicked off the next big AI product category… it’s one of the hottest products in AI. But don’t get it twisted, everyone is copying Elon right now.
0:12

On August 11, SpaceXAI shipped Grok Bot. Grok Bot was built to stay on, gets its own computer, works inside apps and tools like you do, and keep working 24/7 even when your laptop is off. And a lot of AI agents existed before this, including OpenAI’s earlier agent products, but most of them worked more like where you give it a job, let it finish, and then it stops. Grok Bot pushed the idea of having an AI worker that is always there, always running, and organized more like a team. You can have a chief of staff at the top, different specialists handling different jobs, and now the same bot can even be shared across a team. Then on September 8, Meta launched Muse, 28 days later. Meta called it “The World’s First Personal AI Agent Built for Everyone.” Muse also gets its own computer in the cloud. It can work across apps, keep going after you close it, and ask before doing things like sending emails or spending money. Zuck made it a huge part of Meta Connect and talked about bringing this kind of agent to billions of people. Then yesterday, 49 days after Grok Bot launched, Sam introduced dots. OpenAI describes them as always-on agents with their own cloud computers that can work on your goals 24/7 and connect across thousands of apps. A full team of dots is part of the bigger vision too. So when I see people framing this as OpenAI vs. Meta, a huge part of the story is missing… Grok Bot shipped first. The shift toward always-on AI workers with their own computers is clearly where the industry is going now and Grok Bot kicked off the next big AI product category… it’s one of the hottest products in AI. But don’t get it twisted, everyone is copying Elon right now.

Teslaconomics

15,785 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

💬 We get asked Can I manage my strategies without clicking through the platform? ❕ Answer from a GT App Top Trader: Yes, and it’s a total game-changer. I’ve started using the GT Protocol MCP server to connect the platform directly to my AI agent. 🔸 Fast Integration Grab the MCP server from the GT Protocol GitHub and follow the repo guide, it’s a quick setup that only takes a couple of minutes. Once it’s ready, you can connect Claude, Cursor, or Claude Code to your account. Just tell your agent to authenticate, and your tokens will be saved automatically. 🔸 Trading via conversation Now, I use natural language for everything. For example, I just ask for a backtest, get the win rate in seconds, and deploy to a demo account with one command. 🔸 Instant monitoring I don't click around anymore. I just ask "What’s running right now?" to get a full breakdown of active bots and profits delivered straight into the chat. No more forms or clicking, just pure AI-driven trading! 👉 Get the MCP Server
0:13

💬 We get asked Can I manage my strategies without clicking through the platform? ❕ Answer from a GT App Top Trader: Yes, and it’s a total game-changer. I’ve started using the GT Protocol MCP server to connect the platform directly to my AI agent. 🔸 Fast Integration Grab the MCP server from the GT Protocol GitHub and follow the repo guide, it’s a quick setup that only takes a couple of minutes. Once it’s ready, you can connect Claude, Cursor, or Claude Code to your account. Just tell your agent to authenticate, and your tokens will be saved automatically. 🔸 Trading via conversation Now, I use natural language for everything. For example, I just ask for a backtest, get the win rate in seconds, and deploy to a demo account with one command. 🔸 Instant monitoring I don't click around anymore. I just ask "What’s running right now?" to get a full breakdown of active bots and profits delivered straight into the chat. No more forms or clicking, just pure AI-driven trading! 👉 Get the MCP Server

GT Protocol

36,479 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Claude Code Agent Teams are f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → a team lead breaks your project into pieces, spins up multiple AI agents, and they all work on different parts simultaneously. Research, builds, reviews, and debugging: all happening at the same time. All inside Claude Code. If you're running complex projects where every step waits on the last one... Agent teams eliminate the entire bottleneck: → Tell Claude what you need and describe the team structure in plain English → A lead agent breaks the work into a shared task list → It spawns 3-5 teammates — each with their own context and workspace → Teammates research, build, test, and review in parallel → They message each other, share findings, and challenge each other's work → The lead synthesizes everything into a finished deliverable No managing agents yourself. No waiting for step 1 to finish before step 2 starts. No single-lens reviews that miss half the issues. What you get: → Competitive research across 5 brands done in minutes instead of hours → Multi-component builds where frontend, backend, and data layers happen simultaneously → Creative reviews from 3 different angles at once — brand voice, conversion, differentiation → Funnel debugging where 4 agents investigate 4 theories and debate until they find the real answer Built 100% in Claude Code with one settings change. I put together a full DTC playbook: 5 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, token management tips, and honest guidance on when agent teams are worth it vs. when a simpler approach is the better move. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "AGENTS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:10

Claude Code Agent Teams are f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → a team lead breaks your project into pieces, spins up multiple AI agents, and they all work on different parts simultaneously. Research, builds, reviews, and debugging: all happening at the same time. All inside Claude Code. If you're running complex projects where every step waits on the last one... Agent teams eliminate the entire bottleneck: → Tell Claude what you need and describe the team structure in plain English → A lead agent breaks the work into a shared task list → It spawns 3-5 teammates — each with their own context and workspace → Teammates research, build, test, and review in parallel → They message each other, share findings, and challenge each other's work → The lead synthesizes everything into a finished deliverable No managing agents yourself. No waiting for step 1 to finish before step 2 starts. No single-lens reviews that miss half the issues. What you get: → Competitive research across 5 brands done in minutes instead of hours → Multi-component builds where frontend, backend, and data layers happen simultaneously → Creative reviews from 3 different angles at once — brand voice, conversion, differentiation → Funnel debugging where 4 agents investigate 4 theories and debate until they find the real answer Built 100% in Claude Code with one settings change. I put together a full DTC playbook: 5 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, token management tips, and honest guidance on when agent teams are worth it vs. when a simpler approach is the better move. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "AGENTS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

46,478 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

A 17-year-old student spent $4,200 on 7 Mac minis. Small silver boxes. Stacked on a desk. Connected in one room. From the outside, it looked like a stupid purchase. But inside, it wasn't just 7 computers. It was Skills. Hooks. Memory. Worktrees. One machine handled repeatable tasks. One ran checks automatically. One kept context between sessions. Others ran parallel jobs without touching each other's work. While most people were still typing the same instructions again and again, his setup was already moving. A lot of people pay $200 a month for Claude and still use maybe 20% of it. He built a system around it. Skills turned repeated work into reusable workflows. Hooks made actions fire automatically. Memory stopped every session from starting at zero. Worktrees let multiple tasks run at the same time without collisions. That changed everything. Setup time: under 1 hour once. Time returned: 3 to 5 hours every day. He spent $4,200 once. He made $16,000 in the first week. Not because he found a secret tool. Not because he wrote magical prompts. Because he stopped using it like a chatbot and started using it like infrastructure. 7 Mac minis. 1 student. $4,200 in. $16,000 out. And most people would still call it just a stack of computers.
0:12

A 17-year-old student spent $4,200 on 7 Mac minis. Small silver boxes. Stacked on a desk. Connected in one room. From the outside, it looked like a stupid purchase. But inside, it wasn't just 7 computers. It was Skills. Hooks. Memory. Worktrees. One machine handled repeatable tasks. One ran checks automatically. One kept context between sessions. Others ran parallel jobs without touching each other's work. While most people were still typing the same instructions again and again, his setup was already moving. A lot of people pay $200 a month for Claude and still use maybe 20% of it. He built a system around it. Skills turned repeated work into reusable workflows. Hooks made actions fire automatically. Memory stopped every session from starting at zero. Worktrees let multiple tasks run at the same time without collisions. That changed everything. Setup time: under 1 hour once. Time returned: 3 to 5 hours every day. He spent $4,200 once. He made $16,000 in the first week. Not because he found a secret tool. Not because he wrote magical prompts. Because he stopped using it like a chatbot and started using it like infrastructure. 7 Mac minis. 1 student. $4,200 in. $16,000 out. And most people would still call it just a stack of computers.

Gipp 🦅

21,280 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Opus 5.5 + GrokBot + Jev... I can't believe that I build it I packed the best of AI into ONE agent - now 99% of people’s AI agents look dumb, slow, and expensive Try here (free): prompt → GrokBot → Jev chooses LLM → Claude / GPT working on GrokBot's computer 24/7 → result → Jev sends only the tasks Grok is weak at to Opus or GPT → Jev picks the best model for each task - for example, Claude for motion design and Codex for web design → runs on the ChatGPT and Claude subscriptions you already pay for (API also work) → works on GrokBot computer while you keep chatting → checks every result against the goal before you see it → GrokBot gets smarter and cheaper at the same time → And plenty more features in a bot everyone will call "obvious" by 2030 Try Jevopus, thank me later - then read the article on the full Jev architecture ↓
0:14

Opus 5.5 + GrokBot + Jev... I can't believe that I build it I packed the best of AI into ONE agent - now 99% of people’s AI agents look dumb, slow, and expensive Try here (free): prompt → GrokBot → Jev chooses LLM → Claude / GPT working on GrokBot's computer 24/7 → result → Jev sends only the tasks Grok is weak at to Opus or GPT → Jev picks the best model for each task - for example, Claude for motion design and Codex for web design → runs on the ChatGPT and Claude subscriptions you already pay for (API also work) → works on GrokBot computer while you keep chatting → checks every result against the goal before you see it → GrokBot gets smarter and cheaper at the same time → And plenty more features in a bot everyone will call "obvious" by 2030 Try Jevopus, thank me later - then read the article on the full Jev architecture ↓

codila

263,900 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

LangGraph. CrewAI. Agno. Which one to pick? The good news is that this will not matter soon! Finally, we have a full picture of how the industry is solving this with just three open protocols that work across ALL frameworks. It's not about picking the best framework. Instead, it's about understanding how protocols create interoperability. The Agent Protocol Landscape shows how three complementary protocols are creating a universal language for Agents: > AG-UI (Agent-User Interaction): - The bi-directional connection between agentic backends and frontends. - This is how agents become truly interactive inside your apps, not just as chatbots, but collaborative co-workers. > MCP (Model Context Protocol): - The standard for how agents connect to tools, data, and workflows. > A2A (Agent-to-Agent): - The protocol for multi-agent coordination. - How agents delegate tasks and share intent across systems. These aren't competing standards. They're layers of the same stack and have handshakes with each other. So instead of building point-to-point integrations, you build to protocols. Moreover, you can integrate LangGraph, CrewAI, or Agno into the same frontend, without rewriting your UI logic. These protocols let everything work together. For instance: - Your LangGraph agent pulls data via MCP. - It delegates analysis to a CrewAI agent via A2A. - Results stream to your React app via AG-UI. - Users see real-time collaboration in your interface. This way, you can focus on building agent capabilities instead of integration mechanics. The protocols handle interoperability automatically. CopilotKit unifies this entire stack into one framework so you can build "Cursor for X" style apps without implementing each protocol from scratch. It gives you all three protocols, generative UI support, and production-ready infrastructure in one framework. I have shared this playbook in the replies! It breaks down handshakes, misconceptions, and real examples and shows exactly how to start building.
0:19

LangGraph. CrewAI. Agno. Which one to pick? The good news is that this will not matter soon! Finally, we have a full picture of how the industry is solving this with just three open protocols that work across ALL frameworks. It's not about picking the best framework. Instead, it's about understanding how protocols create interoperability. The Agent Protocol Landscape shows how three complementary protocols are creating a universal language for Agents: > AG-UI (Agent-User Interaction): - The bi-directional connection between agentic backends and frontends. - This is how agents become truly interactive inside your apps, not just as chatbots, but collaborative co-workers. > MCP (Model Context Protocol): - The standard for how agents connect to tools, data, and workflows. > A2A (Agent-to-Agent): - The protocol for multi-agent coordination. - How agents delegate tasks and share intent across systems. These aren't competing standards. They're layers of the same stack and have handshakes with each other. So instead of building point-to-point integrations, you build to protocols. Moreover, you can integrate LangGraph, CrewAI, or Agno into the same frontend, without rewriting your UI logic. These protocols let everything work together. For instance: - Your LangGraph agent pulls data via MCP. - It delegates analysis to a CrewAI agent via A2A. - Results stream to your React app via AG-UI. - Users see real-time collaboration in your interface. This way, you can focus on building agent capabilities instead of integration mechanics. The protocols handle interoperability automatically. CopilotKit unifies this entire stack into one framework so you can build "Cursor for X" style apps without implementing each protocol from scratch. It gives you all three protocols, generative UI support, and production-ready infrastructure in one framework. I have shared this playbook in the replies! It breaks down handshakes, misconceptions, and real examples and shows exactly how to start building.

Avi Chawla

30,932 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Claude + GPT Image 2 + Seedance + Meta Ads MCP Just fired my $10k/month performance marketing agency. Here's the exact stack (and how it runs): Step 1: Research Hand Claude your product page, your competitors' pages, and your best ad angles. It spits out a full brand brief + competitor breakdown in minutes. No strategist. No $200/hour consultant. Step 2: Static ads in seconds Claude crafts image prompts from your brief. Drop those into GPT Image 2. You get scroll-stopping creative. Batched. On-brand. No Figma needed. Step 3: Video ads that convert Claude writes video prompts. Feed them into Seedance 2.0. UGC-style clips. AI actor formats. Product showcases. All generated. Zero filming. (Both GPT Image 2 + Seedance are live on HeyOz right now.) Step 4: Publish + optimize on autopilot Hook Claude into Meta Ads MCP. It pushes your creatives live, tracks performance, and keeps iterating. Your agency was billing you hourly for this exact thing. I documented the full workflow in a guide: prompts, setup, and the exact MCP config. Why this matters: Most brands are still bleeding money on slow, overpriced creative production. The ones who crack this in the next 90 days will own an unfair advantage. Don't be the brand that figures it out too late. Comment "REPLACE" and I'll DM it to you.
0:10

Claude + GPT Image 2 + Seedance + Meta Ads MCP Just fired my $10k/month performance marketing agency. Here's the exact stack (and how it runs): Step 1: Research Hand Claude your product page, your competitors' pages, and your best ad angles. It spits out a full brand brief + competitor breakdown in minutes. No strategist. No $200/hour consultant. Step 2: Static ads in seconds Claude crafts image prompts from your brief. Drop those into GPT Image 2. You get scroll-stopping creative. Batched. On-brand. No Figma needed. Step 3: Video ads that convert Claude writes video prompts. Feed them into Seedance 2.0. UGC-style clips. AI actor formats. Product showcases. All generated. Zero filming. (Both GPT Image 2 + Seedance are live on HeyOz right now.) Step 4: Publish + optimize on autopilot Hook Claude into Meta Ads MCP. It pushes your creatives live, tracks performance, and keeps iterating. Your agency was billing you hourly for this exact thing. I documented the full workflow in a guide: prompts, setup, and the exact MCP config. Why this matters: Most brands are still bleeding money on slow, overpriced creative production. The ones who crack this in the next 90 days will own an unfair advantage. Don't be the brand that figures it out too late. Comment "REPLACE" and I'll DM it to you.

Ahad Shams | AI Ads Guy

18,846 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚁 Adding an Apache attack helicopter today I think I will rewrite the entire flight model today again to be ambiguous of what kind of vehicle it is Planes behave very different than helicopters and different than vehicles like tanks or pedestrians Because people here also requested "Guy with bazooka" so that will be next I have no idea if everyone else is just lying about using AI for their plane models but mine look so clunky (but I like the look), but I now tried with Claude 3.5 and 3.7 and Grok 3 and they all just generate clunky models, not beautiful like you see in other AI vibe coded games, so either they bs'ing or I'm retarded I also have to move sub parts of each model like for 30 minutes until everything fits, AI has a really hard time with 3d models But okay the look is kinda cute
0:19

🚁 Adding an Apache attack helicopter today I think I will rewrite the entire flight model today again to be ambiguous of what kind of vehicle it is Planes behave very different than helicopters and different than vehicles like tanks or pedestrians Because people here also requested "Guy with bazooka" so that will be next I have no idea if everyone else is just lying about using AI for their plane models but mine look so clunky (but I like the look), but I now tried with Claude 3.5 and 3.7 and Grok 3 and they all just generate clunky models, not beautiful like you see in other AI vibe coded games, so either they bs'ing or I'm retarded I also have to move sub parts of each model like for 30 minutes until everything fits, AI has a really hard time with 3d models But okay the look is kinda cute

@levelsio

485,575 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Claude Cowork is f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → competitive research, creative briefs, 15 hook variations, and a full performance dashboard. All saved as real files on your computer. All inside Claude Desktop. If you're spending hours every week copy-pasting between tools, pulling competitor ads manually, writing briefs from scratch, and building reports in spreadsheets ... Claude Cowork eliminates the entire loop: → Point it at your project folder with brand voice + context files → It asks YOU clarifying questions instead of guessing → It builds a multi-step plan and executes while you step away → It creates real .docx, .xlsx, .pptx files — not chat responses → It connects to Slack, Google Drive, Airtable, and 50+ tools live No copy-pasting between tools. No babysitting the AI mid-task. No downloading and re-uploading files. What you get: → Competitive research synthesized into actionable creative angles → Ad briefs, hooks, and scripts generated in your brand voice → Interactive HTML dashboards built from your own customer data → Weekly performance reports created while you're getting coffee Built 100% inside Claude Desktop with skills, plugins, and connectors. I put together a full DTC playbook: 10 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, and the weekly operating rhythm I use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "COWORK" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:10

Claude Cowork is f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → competitive research, creative briefs, 15 hook variations, and a full performance dashboard. All saved as real files on your computer. All inside Claude Desktop. If you're spending hours every week copy-pasting between tools, pulling competitor ads manually, writing briefs from scratch, and building reports in spreadsheets ... Claude Cowork eliminates the entire loop: → Point it at your project folder with brand voice + context files → It asks YOU clarifying questions instead of guessing → It builds a multi-step plan and executes while you step away → It creates real .docx, .xlsx, .pptx files — not chat responses → It connects to Slack, Google Drive, Airtable, and 50+ tools live No copy-pasting between tools. No babysitting the AI mid-task. No downloading and re-uploading files. What you get: → Competitive research synthesized into actionable creative angles → Ad briefs, hooks, and scripts generated in your brand voice → Interactive HTML dashboards built from your own customer data → Weekly performance reports created while you're getting coffee Built 100% inside Claude Desktop with skills, plugins, and connectors. I put together a full DTC playbook: 10 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, and the weekly operating rhythm I use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "COWORK" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Utkarsh Sharma

29,928 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Claude Cowork is f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → competitive research, creative briefs, 15 hook variations, and a full performance dashboard. All saved as real files on your computer. All inside Claude Desktop. If you're spending hours every week copy-pasting between tools, pulling competitor ads manually, writing briefs from scratch, and building reports in spreadsheets ... Claude Cowork eliminates the entire loop: → Point it at your project folder with brand voice + context files → It asks YOU clarifying questions instead of guessing → It builds a multi-step plan and executes while you step away → It creates real .docx, .xlsx, .pptx files — not chat responses → It connects to Slack, Google Drive, Airtable, and 50+ tools live No copy-pasting between tools. No babysitting the AI mid-task. No downloading and re-uploading files. What you get: → Competitive research synthesized into actionable creative angles → Ad briefs, hooks, and scripts generated in your brand voice → Interactive HTML dashboards built from your own customer data → Weekly performance reports created while you're getting coffee Built 100% inside Claude Desktop with skills, plugins, and connectors. I put together a full DTC playbook: 10 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, and the weekly operating rhythm I use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "COWORK" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:10

Claude Cowork is f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → competitive research, creative briefs, 15 hook variations, and a full performance dashboard. All saved as real files on your computer. All inside Claude Desktop. If you're spending hours every week copy-pasting between tools, pulling competitor ads manually, writing briefs from scratch, and building reports in spreadsheets ... Claude Cowork eliminates the entire loop: → Point it at your project folder with brand voice + context files → It asks YOU clarifying questions instead of guessing → It builds a multi-step plan and executes while you step away → It creates real .docx, .xlsx, .pptx files — not chat responses → It connects to Slack, Google Drive, Airtable, and 50+ tools live No copy-pasting between tools. No babysitting the AI mid-task. No downloading and re-uploading files. What you get: → Competitive research synthesized into actionable creative angles → Ad briefs, hooks, and scripts generated in your brand voice → Interactive HTML dashboards built from your own customer data → Weekly performance reports created while you're getting coffee Built 100% inside Claude Desktop with skills, plugins, and connectors. I put together a full DTC playbook: 10 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, and the weekly operating rhythm I use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "COWORK" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Manoj Kumar Shah

17,159 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Claude Cowork is f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → competitive research, creative briefs, 15 hook variations, and a full performance dashboard. All saved as real files on your computer. All inside Claude Desktop. If you're spending hours every week copy-pasting between tools, pulling competitor ads manually, writing briefs from scratch, and building reports in spreadsheets ... Claude Cowork eliminates the entire loop: → Point it at your project folder with brand voice + context files → It asks YOU clarifying questions instead of guessing → It builds a multi-step plan and executes while you step away → It creates real .docx, .xlsx, .pptx files — not chat responses → It connects to Slack, Google Drive, Airtable, and 50+ tools live No copy-pasting between tools. No babysitting the AI mid-task. No downloading and re-uploading files. What you get: → Competitive research synthesized into actionable creative angles → Ad briefs, hooks, and scripts generated in your brand voice → Interactive HTML dashboards built from your own customer data → Weekly performance reports created while you're getting coffee Built 100% inside Claude Desktop with skills, plugins, and connectors. I put together a full DTC playbook: 10 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, and the weekly operating rhythm I use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "COWORK" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:10

Claude Cowork is f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → competitive research, creative briefs, 15 hook variations, and a full performance dashboard. All saved as real files on your computer. All inside Claude Desktop. If you're spending hours every week copy-pasting between tools, pulling competitor ads manually, writing briefs from scratch, and building reports in spreadsheets ... Claude Cowork eliminates the entire loop: → Point it at your project folder with brand voice + context files → It asks YOU clarifying questions instead of guessing → It builds a multi-step plan and executes while you step away → It creates real .docx, .xlsx, .pptx files — not chat responses → It connects to Slack, Google Drive, Airtable, and 50+ tools live No copy-pasting between tools. No babysitting the AI mid-task. No downloading and re-uploading files. What you get: → Competitive research synthesized into actionable creative angles → Ad briefs, hooks, and scripts generated in your brand voice → Interactive HTML dashboards built from your own customer data → Weekly performance reports created while you're getting coffee Built 100% inside Claude Desktop with skills, plugins, and connectors. I put together a full DTC playbook: 10 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, and the weekly operating rhythm I use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "COWORK" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

113,193 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce