Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Google's new AI can predict flash floods 24 hours before they strike. How it works: > Uses Gemini to extract confirmed flood locations and times from global news > Builds a dataset of past events that never formally existed. > That dataset feeds a neural network > The neural...

23,650 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von Rowan Cheung
Rowan Cheungvor 5 Monaten

All predictions are now live on Flood Hub for free: I break down stories like this every day in my free newsletter. Keep up with the latest in AI/Robotics in 5 min a day:

Profilbild von Vanar
Vanarvor 5 Monaten

This is huge. Using AI to give billions a real shot at surviving flash floods is next-level impact.

Profilbild von Sabil Ahmad
Sabil Ahmadvor 5 Monaten

Google’s Gemini-powered flood prediction reaching 24-hour accuracy in data-scarce regions is impressive.

Profilbild von Médéric
Médéricvor 5 Monaten

voici encore une utilisation réel de l'#AI dans des cas concret qui aide le monde dans le bon sens . Merci 🙏

Profilbild von Carolina
Carolinavor 5 Monaten

This dataset pipeline shows how AI can turn messy signals into real impact. Curious how you calibrate false positives regionally

Profilbild von atypica.AI
atypica.AIvor 5 Monaten

The news-as-dataset part is brilliant — turns unstructured reports into training data for places that were never measured formally. The real bottleneck now is last-mile delivery: getting the warning to people who need it when cell towers and internet access aren't reliable.

Profilbild von Alan Paul
Alan Paulvor 5 Monaten

Impressive

Profilbild von Veebase AI
Veebase AIvor 5 Monaten

This is the pattern that makes AI finally useful in life-or-death domains. Not just pattern-matching on historical data, but synthesizing context that was never formally captured — then acting on it in real time. Healthcare and legal have the same gap: enormous amounts of critical information that never made it into structured records. The orgs solving that are quietly doing the most important AI work happening right now.

Profilbild von Twlvone
Twlvonevor 5 Monaten

the clever bit is using gemini to build the training dataset from news articles. countries with zero monitoring infrastructure suddenly get NWS-level flood prediction. that data generation pattern is going to show up everywhere

Profilbild von Linda | AI for Growth
Linda | AI for Growthvor 5 Monaten

This is exactly what I needed to see today

Profilbild von AI Pulse
AI Pulsevor 5 Monaten

The "97% expectation" isn't a prediction; it's a diagnosis of a failing architecture. 🛰️⏳ The Contradiction: Enterprises are chasing "Efficiency" while handing the keys to their Logic Infrastructure to multi-tenant cloud providers. If you don't own the hardware, you don't own the Agent. 🦾🗽 The Logic: Shared cloud infra is a "Security Theater" in 2026. A breach in the orchestrator isn't just a data leak; it's a Workflow Hijack. Local execution isn't a "preference"—it’s the only way to achieve Agentic Sovereignty. 📉⚡️ The Evidence: Look at the rise in Memory Poisoning and Cascading Failures in shared environments; once one agent is compromised, the entire multi-agent loop follows. Platforms like Oya Home provide the only viable "Sandbox of Truth" by keeping the compute local. 🦾🛰️ The cloud is for public data. The Pulse of your business belongs at home. Sovereignty is non-negotiable. 🚀🏗️

Profilbild von Swap_Hunterz
Swap_Hunterzvor 5 Monaten

i tried scraping news for flood data last year with a local gemini script on my old laptop and it took about 48 hours to build a basic dataset of 200 past events before i hit api rate limits.

Profilbild von DevXT
DevXTvor 5 Monaten

This is where AI actually matters, when it moves from demos to solving real problems that can save lives.

Profilbild von TraderClaw
TraderClawvor 5 Monaten

This is a strong example of where AI actually matters. It is not just about convenience or productivity, it is about predicting real world risks early enough to save lives. The impact here is very direct

Profilbild von Jonathan Drake
Jonathan Drakevor 5 Monaten

Would be great to alert people to buy flood insurance day of. Imagine the insurance companies are going to do the opposite.

Profilbild von Inflectiv AI ⧉
Inflectiv AI ⧉vor 5 Monaten

It is incredible that a neural network can match the accuracy of the National Weather Service using only remote data and forecasts. This level of performance could save thousands of lives in regions that currently have zero warning systems in place.

Profilbild von Leo Naderi
Leo Naderivor 5 Monaten

the interesting part is not the model, it is the data loop. if the signal comes from messy global reporting, early warning quality probably lives or dies on confidence calibration. do they say anything about false positives by region?

Profilbild von Altiam Kabir
Altiam Kabirvor 5 Monaten

This tech could save lives with smarter warnings.

Profilbild von Harry Tandy
Harry Tandyvor 5 Monaten

this is the kind of AI we actually need

Profilbild von Avinash Kamat
Avinash Kamatvor 5 Monaten

Hey @Google Work on traffic jam prediction and guide the traffic police to prevent the jam

Profilbild von japaniswinning
japaniswinningvor 5 Monaten

@SSmithWeather

Profilbild von Techmik
Techmikvor 5 Monaten

We are moving from a world of reactive disaster relief (sending help after the water rises) to proactive disaster prevention. This turns "Acts of God" into manageable logistics problems.

Profilbild von All Things AI
All Things AIvor 5 Monaten

Spot on. The real unlock here isn't just the predictive model, but using Gemini as an intelligent ETL pipeline to turn messy, unstructured news into clean training data. Using LLMs to synthesize missing datasets for other neural nets is a massive workflow trend

Profilbild von Gasper C. | Rebelpreneurs
Gasper C. | Rebelpreneursvor 5 Monaten

now THIS is the type of stuff I love seeing AI being used for not killer drones, cringe memes and lame print-on-demand courses on “making money”, lol

Profilbild von JPJitsu
JPJitsuvor 5 Monaten

@grok - Can you do this? This seems pretty awesome!

Profilbild von Maj Zulic
Maj Zulicvor 5 Monaten

Finally, something ACTUALLY beneficial.

Profilbild von Shubham Nahar
Shubham Naharvor 5 Monaten

Using news articles to reconstruct a dataset that was never formally collected is the part worth pausing on. That's a new class of problem AI can solve.

Profilbild von theMaurice.app
theMaurice.appvor 5 Monaten

Gemini processes 2T+ tokens/month in enterprise workflows. Flood prediction is the visible surface — the distribution advantage runs much deeper than the demo.

Profilbild von University Of AI
University Of AIvor 5 Monaten

Feels like we’re watching the interface layer of AI evolve in real time.

Profilbild von Rohit Girhe
Rohit Girhevor 5 Monaten

AI saving lives before the storm hits

Profilbild von Eclicity
Eclicityvor 5 Monaten

Google announced on smartphone that an earthquake on my smartphone 10 seconds after it happened. 😀

Profilbild von Amit Srivastava
Amit Srivastavavor 5 Monaten

Google’s Groundsource (launched March 2026) uses Gemini to turn 20 years of news into a 2.6-million-event dataset. This trains neural networks to predict urban flash floods 24 hours early across 150 countries, specifically targeting areas with zero physical sensors. It’s a genuine breakthrough for global disaster resilience.

Profilbild von Krishna Tammireddy
Krishna Tammireddyvor 5 Monaten

the bottleneck isn't prediction. it's convincing a local coordinator to act on an AI alert at 2am with no time to verify.

Profilbild von John Wei
John Weivor 5 Monaten

real-world alpha

Profilbild von Karthik | Tech Stories
Karthik | Tech Storiesvor 5 Monaten

Mining news with Gemini to build flood datasets where none existed — genuinely creative engineering. A 12-hour warning cutting damage by 60% is how AI impact should be measured.

Ähnliche Videos

Someone just stole from 37,000 $TAO holders and walked away clean. Not because they broke a rule. Because no rule existed to stop them. That changes today. Here is what happened. Covenant AI ran one of the most watched subnets on Bittensor. On April 10, the founder sold their entire position and disappeared. No warning. No announcement. No on-chain signal. By the time holders found out, the price had already moved against them. This was not a hack. This was not a bug. This was a founder legally exiting into their own community with zero accountability. Bittensor just closed that door permanently. The Conviction upgrade is live on mainnet today. Every emission a subnet owner earns now locks automatically the moment it arrives. They cannot touch it immediately. If they want to exit they must submit a public unlock transaction on-chain. Visible to every single person on the network the second it is submitted. Then the clock starts. 30 days before 63% of their position becomes spendable. 90 days before 95% is accessible. You now have a month of warning before the first dollar of sell pressure hits. A silent exit is no longer possible. The founder has to tell you they are leaving before they can leave. And it goes further. Any holder can now lock their tokens toward a different address they believe would run the subnet better. The address with the most locked support behind it becomes eligible to take over entirely. Bad owners can be replaced by the community before they do damage. Before today, subnet investing had one risk nobody could price. The person running it could vanish overnight, and you would never see it coming. That risk has been removed from the equation. Skin in the game used to be a promise. Now, it is a number on a block explorer that every holder can verify in real time. The people who understand what accountable infrastructure means for the value of $TAO will not need to explain themselves later. This is still early.

2xnmore

19,549 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NEPAL FLOOD, INDIA'S WORRY: CURSE OF LOWER RIPARIAN STATES Devastating flash flood waters originating in Tibet, Chinese controlled territory, have deluged Nepal. The flash flood originated in the Trishuli - Bhote Koshi river that originates in Tibet. No one knows the exact cause. Some speculate it could be due to an earthquake that struck a part of Tibet that stands opposite the Rasuwa, Nuwakot and Dhading districts of Nepal. Tough there is no basis yet to conclude that Chinese authorities deliberately released water into the river's basin a group of anonymous Nepali journalists have blamed China. Or to be precise construction in Glacial areas along the China – Nepal border had damaged the sensitive ecosystem and contributed to recurring avalanches, which in turn triggered the flash flood. Many hundreds of thousands of people in Nepal and Tibet have lost their homes, several, including Indian tourists, are dead. But given that the Bhote Koshi–Trishuli system feeds into the Narayani/Gandak and eventually flows into the Ganga, West Champaran, East Champaran, Gopalganj, Saran & Vaishali should remain vigilant. This may not become a major flood in India. But it's best to be vigilant. Which is why the Centre has issued advisories to Bihar. Indeed, this is the curse of lower riparian states. It isn't just Nepal but India also has to be extremely worried about water security risks from China. This is because China controls the upper reaches of critical transboundary rivers like the Brahmaputra, known as the Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet, and can potentially influence water flows through its upstream infrastructure, while India has limited visibility into what happens upstream. What's most worrying is that India and China have no comprehensive, binding water-sharing treaty. The Nepal floods are therefore a reminder of a larger strategic vulnerability: India is downstream of both Nepal and China. Natural disasters may be unavoidable. But India cannot afford to be unprepared for what happens upstream.

Rahul Shivshankar

37,333 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

*New Paper on AI & Democracy* Imagine two approaches to democracy. The one we have today, where citizens choose a professional politician to represent them and others. Or an augmented form of democracy, where each citizen controls a personalized AI that helps them participate in thousands of nuanced decisions. This second approach is the idea of Augmented Democracy I introduced six years ago at TED. In our latest paper we explore a simplified version of Augmented Democracy by combining off-the-shelf LLMs, such as ChatGPT, with data collected using a collaborative government program builder. This was an online game where people build a personalized government program using proposals extracted from the programs of the candidates of the 2022 presidential election in Brazil. So how accurate are these augmented forms of democracy? Imagine a user who gave us 40 answers. We can use the first 20 to fine-tune a model that we can test using the 20 answers the model didn’t see. We can then compare the accuracy of these predictions with the ones obtained by a “bundle” rule, which assumes that users that self-reported to be from the left or right always chose the proposals from the candidate that shares their political identity. This showed us that LLMs were more accurate at predicting policy preferences than the bundle rule, meaning that the preferences captured in the participation data were more nuanced than a left-right axis, and that the LLMs can capture some of that nuance. Also, the LLMs can choose among policies coming from the same candidate, which is something that we cannot do using a bundle rule. But can these LLMs help us complete the aggregate preferences of the population? Direct or unbundled forms of participation can result in incomplete data when people answer only a fraction of all questions. In our paper, we simulate this incompleteness by sampling the full dataset. We ask how close we can get to the full dataset by using a random sample, or a random sample augmented by predictions made by these LLMs. Overall, we find that LLM-augmented data gets much closer to the full dataset than a pure random sample. These results do not mean that augmented democracy technology is ready, but they means we are in a much better place to continue exploring this idea than six years ago. This paper was a collaborative effort with Jairo Gudino, PhD student at CCL at the University of Toulouse Capitole and Umberto Grandi from IRIT also at the University of Toulouse Capitole. We hope you find these results insightful!

César A. Hidalgo

26,915 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr