Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

gooning weekend rt game challenge 😵‍💫 How long should I watch this vid on loop till Monday while struggling not to cum? 🥵 Likes/Reposts add +1/+2 minutes each 😖 #humiliation #submission #pumpslut #pussyfree #fistfucker #pornaddict #wank #jerk #goon

pornagotchi's profile picture

🎀pornagotchi🎀

81,245 subscribers

47,653 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#humiliation#submission#pumpslut#pussyfree#fistfucker#pornaddict#wank#jerk#goon
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Cursor pays engineers $1,100,000 a year to run teams of AI agents that ship code while they sleep. [The CEO of Cursor explained in 9 minutes how they ship at 100x speed using team of agents] ↓ Save this before everyone copies the playbook 1. Engineers no longer babysit one assistant. They manage dozens of agent colleagues working in parallel, each on its own remote machine 2. Validation contract before code, not after. Humans only at scoping and review. 3. The agent team handles the full loop : planning, coding, testing, shipping PRs with each agent specialised for a role. Watch the guide. Then read the guide below by Khairallah AL-Awady
9:37

Cursor pays engineers $1,100,000 a year to run teams of AI agents that ship code while they sleep. [The CEO of Cursor explained in 9 minutes how they ship at 100x speed using team of agents] ↓ Save this before everyone copies the playbook 1. Engineers no longer babysit one assistant. They manage dozens of agent colleagues working in parallel, each on its own remote machine 2. Validation contract before code, not after. Humans only at scoping and review. 3. The agent team handles the full loop : planning, coding, testing, shipping PRs with each agent specialised for a role. Watch the guide. Then read the guide below by Khairallah AL-Awady

Avid

634,839 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I was chatting with the Duel minions, and this video came up from when I used to play on #CSGOEmpire. This was real money, not what everyone else does now, and you know that very well, Ketola. It made me laugh, because even in this video I didn’t even remember, thejew scams me lol. I bet €200k on T and they don’t count it. What kind of Jew are you? €100k bets, sure, but you won’t let me double… Are you going to give me those €200k as a gesture of good faith, or should we add it to everything else? ^^ Well, at least I completed the challenge and went from €100,000 to €400,000 in 3 minutes. €100,000 profit per minute, not bad. Drop a Like & RT for old times, degens. Lately it feels like you get charged for interacting. And while you’re at it, leave a comment on whether the master Jew should wire me €200k immediately for that insane skill issue, or for having too much skill for them to take €200k off me. By the way, today you tried to hit me with a bot attack I had already been warned about. It didn’t work. I’ll leave this post open so you can try again. That’s how I start playing too, sir.
2:59

I was chatting with the Duel minions, and this video came up from when I used to play on #CSGOEmpire. This was real money, not what everyone else does now, and you know that very well, Ketola. It made me laugh, because even in this video I didn’t even remember, thejew scams me lol. I bet €200k on T and they don’t count it. What kind of Jew are you? €100k bets, sure, but you won’t let me double… Are you going to give me those €200k as a gesture of good faith, or should we add it to everything else? ^^ Well, at least I completed the challenge and went from €100,000 to €400,000 in 3 minutes. €100,000 profit per minute, not bad. Drop a Like & RT for old times, degens. Lately it feels like you get charged for interacting. And while you’re at it, leave a comment on whether the master Jew should wire me €200k immediately for that insane skill issue, or for having too much skill for them to take €200k off me. By the way, today you tried to hit me with a bot attack I had already been warned about. It didn’t work. I’ll leave this post open so you can try again. That’s how I start playing too, sir.

Dr. W

11,086 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Claude Code can ship a 45-second animated explainer ad in 30 minutes. No video editor needed, just CC + skills. Here's how I made this video for Soteri Skin 👇 1. /plan Concept Brief (Claude Code) I handwrite a concept brief, then chat with the agent to iterate on it. The agent gathers any raw materials we might need - context about the brand, product images, end card, etc. The concept brief details the concept, characters, visual style, script, etc 2. /prepare a moodboard (CC + GPT Image 2 + ElevenLabs) After reviewing the script, generate: - character reference images - voiceover samples for the characters / narrator - the storyboard (scene by scene grid) - a few keyframe scenes 3. /generate Keyframes for each scene (CC uses Nano Banana or GPT Image 2) Uses the character references from the previous step to generate keyframes for each scene. I probably should have done a round of iteration at this step – there's some character drift and the pH meter representation could have been better. 4. /animate Keyframe → Animated Clip (CC uses Fal Seedance) Generate 2-4 representative scenes first to see a preview. If it looks good, then generate everything. 5. /stitch (CC + ffmpeg + ElevenLabs) - Stitch clips together with hard cut - Add a music score + SFX - Sync clips to the VO - Add captions - Review and edit timing / pacing issues 6. /watch the final cut and review it - as a video editor for technical errors (mismatched voiceover and visuals, AI hallucinations, etc) - as a viewer (ICP). I delegate most of the review to the agent because it catches more things and keeps me out of the loop as much as possible. It also fixes any issues found in the review. That's it. This video took me 30 minutes because I have already created skills for everything I described above. Some day, this will be < 5 minutes. I just review and chat to provide direction and feedback. The skills do all the technical work. 7. /learn Extracts learnings and updates the skills. This final step is really important. It turns this process into a closed loop system that makes the next video much easier to create because all the learnings from the human-in-the-loop process get encoded into code. Skills are code too. If you want access to the skill, drop a comment, and I'll DM it to you (must be following). If you want to make AI video ads like this, DM me.
0:45

Claude Code can ship a 45-second animated explainer ad in 30 minutes. No video editor needed, just CC + skills. Here's how I made this video for Soteri Skin 👇 1. /plan Concept Brief (Claude Code) I handwrite a concept brief, then chat with the agent to iterate on it. The agent gathers any raw materials we might need - context about the brand, product images, end card, etc. The concept brief details the concept, characters, visual style, script, etc 2. /prepare a moodboard (CC + GPT Image 2 + ElevenLabs) After reviewing the script, generate: - character reference images - voiceover samples for the characters / narrator - the storyboard (scene by scene grid) - a few keyframe scenes 3. /generate Keyframes for each scene (CC uses Nano Banana or GPT Image 2) Uses the character references from the previous step to generate keyframes for each scene. I probably should have done a round of iteration at this step – there's some character drift and the pH meter representation could have been better. 4. /animate Keyframe → Animated Clip (CC uses Fal Seedance) Generate 2-4 representative scenes first to see a preview. If it looks good, then generate everything. 5. /stitch (CC + ffmpeg + ElevenLabs) - Stitch clips together with hard cut - Add a music score + SFX - Sync clips to the VO - Add captions - Review and edit timing / pacing issues 6. /watch the final cut and review it - as a video editor for technical errors (mismatched voiceover and visuals, AI hallucinations, etc) - as a viewer (ICP). I delegate most of the review to the agent because it catches more things and keeps me out of the loop as much as possible. It also fixes any issues found in the review. That's it. This video took me 30 minutes because I have already created skills for everything I described above. Some day, this will be < 5 minutes. I just review and chat to provide direction and feedback. The skills do all the technical work. 7. /learn Extracts learnings and updates the skills. This final step is really important. It turns this process into a closed loop system that makes the next video much easier to create because all the learnings from the human-in-the-loop process get encoded into code. Skills are code too. If you want access to the skill, drop a comment, and I'll DM it to you (must be following). If you want to make AI video ads like this, DM me.

Shiv

11,608 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

HIGH PROTEIN + HEALTHY 🥜🍫CHOCOLATE PEANUT BUTTER LAVA CAKE You won’t believe this healthy dessert is high-protein with 50g protein, super lowcarb, and completely flourless! It makes two giant servings at 215 cals and 25g protein each and it’s SO good. Healthy desserts like this have been the game changer in keeping me on track during my 150lb weight loss journey - this is my fav one, and so good if you love chocolate and have a sweet tooth. Can you taste the cottage cheese? NO! Here is how I made it: Ingredients: 2 servings blended cottage cheese (about half a 16oz tub) 2 large eggs 3-4 tbsp powdered monkfruit (or sweetener of choice) 2.5-3 tbsp cacao powder (I use 3.5 tbsp for a richer taste) Splash of vanilla extract Optional: a sprinkle of chocolate chips Optional: Powdered Peanut butter and 1 tbsp crushed peanuts for the frosting 1️⃣ Process or blend 8oz cottage cheese in a small food processor until smooth and transfer to an oven-safe dish. 2️⃣ Crack in the eggs 3️⃣ Add the cacao powder (adjust for desired darkness). I like richer so I add more, but do what works for you. 4️⃣ Add 3-4 tbsp powdered monkfruit or preferred sweetener. 5️⃣ Add a splash of vanilla extract & mix thoroughly with a fork till no clumps. 6️⃣ Sprinkle chocolate chips on top, if desired, and add 1 to 2 tsp peanut butter inside. To make this lower calorie, skip the peanut butter here and just top it with the lower calorie pb frosting below. For the lower calorie peanut butter frosting mix 1-2 tbsp powdered peanut butter with 1-2 tbsp water or almond milk and 1 tsp powdered monkfruit. I promise, it’s just as good! 7️⃣ Pop it into the oven and bake at 350°F for 32 minutes. 8️⃣ Remove, let cool for 2 minutes, then top with the lower calorie pb drizzle, some crushed peanuts, and enjoy! If you try it, be sure to let me know on SHREDHAPPENS! ENJOY! . . . . . #lowcarb #lowcarbrecipes #keto #healthyrecipes #healthyfoodshare
0:29

HIGH PROTEIN + HEALTHY 🥜🍫CHOCOLATE PEANUT BUTTER LAVA CAKE You won’t believe this healthy dessert is high-protein with 50g protein, super lowcarb, and completely flourless! It makes two giant servings at 215 cals and 25g protein each and it’s SO good. Healthy desserts like this have been the game changer in keeping me on track during my 150lb weight loss journey - this is my fav one, and so good if you love chocolate and have a sweet tooth. Can you taste the cottage cheese? NO! Here is how I made it: Ingredients: 2 servings blended cottage cheese (about half a 16oz tub) 2 large eggs 3-4 tbsp powdered monkfruit (or sweetener of choice) 2.5-3 tbsp cacao powder (I use 3.5 tbsp for a richer taste) Splash of vanilla extract Optional: a sprinkle of chocolate chips Optional: Powdered Peanut butter and 1 tbsp crushed peanuts for the frosting 1️⃣ Process or blend 8oz cottage cheese in a small food processor until smooth and transfer to an oven-safe dish. 2️⃣ Crack in the eggs 3️⃣ Add the cacao powder (adjust for desired darkness). I like richer so I add more, but do what works for you. 4️⃣ Add 3-4 tbsp powdered monkfruit or preferred sweetener. 5️⃣ Add a splash of vanilla extract & mix thoroughly with a fork till no clumps. 6️⃣ Sprinkle chocolate chips on top, if desired, and add 1 to 2 tsp peanut butter inside. To make this lower calorie, skip the peanut butter here and just top it with the lower calorie pb frosting below. For the lower calorie peanut butter frosting mix 1-2 tbsp powdered peanut butter with 1-2 tbsp water or almond milk and 1 tsp powdered monkfruit. I promise, it’s just as good! 7️⃣ Pop it into the oven and bake at 350°F for 32 minutes. 8️⃣ Remove, let cool for 2 minutes, then top with the lower calorie pb drizzle, some crushed peanuts, and enjoy! If you try it, be sure to let me know on SHREDHAPPENS! ENJOY! . . . . . #lowcarb #lowcarbrecipes #keto #healthyrecipes #healthyfoodshare

Shredhappens

12,759 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Meetings suck. AI makes them suck more. But not for the reasons you think. Nate B Jones talks about how you are destroying company value with meetings. Everybody is looking at AI as a way to cut team sizes, but this is also wrong: - Look back at your week, you probably spent 1/3 of your time in meetings. - Team sizes max at 5, every person after that has a cost in productivity (both personal and in communication co-ordination). - Up till now, we've been willing to pay the price of each additional person in a meeting (and each meeting) because we needed to get large orgs to co-ordinate or it's chaos. - The cost of lost productivity was worth it, because each person generates maybe 200-300k in company value. - But in the age of AI, each person using AI can be maybe 5-10x more productive. This means the cost of each person in a meeting is taking away not 200k in value, but 1M per person. - Every person you add to a meeting above 5 (and I would argue per meeting), is costing you 1 - 2 million dollars. It's not worth it, not by a little, by an order of magnitude. - The naive approach is to think this means you need less people and should fire everyone. This is the wrong framing. - The correct pattern is smaller team sizes, optimal at 5, where adding an additional person does not cost you 1-2M dollars. And then doing MORE with everyone else, also in smaller strike teams of 5. - You now have excess capacity, a fleet of aircraft carriers instead of fishing boats. - Your org need to reach for MORE, instead of trying to do the same job for less. You can reach more markets, higher complexity projects and generate more revenue. Think BIGGER, not "same company, less people." He's right, and game teams should think the same way.
4:04

Meetings suck. AI makes them suck more. But not for the reasons you think. Nate B Jones talks about how you are destroying company value with meetings. Everybody is looking at AI as a way to cut team sizes, but this is also wrong: - Look back at your week, you probably spent 1/3 of your time in meetings. - Team sizes max at 5, every person after that has a cost in productivity (both personal and in communication co-ordination). - Up till now, we've been willing to pay the price of each additional person in a meeting (and each meeting) because we needed to get large orgs to co-ordinate or it's chaos. - The cost of lost productivity was worth it, because each person generates maybe 200-300k in company value. - But in the age of AI, each person using AI can be maybe 5-10x more productive. This means the cost of each person in a meeting is taking away not 200k in value, but 1M per person. - Every person you add to a meeting above 5 (and I would argue per meeting), is costing you 1 - 2 million dollars. It's not worth it, not by a little, by an order of magnitude. - The naive approach is to think this means you need less people and should fire everyone. This is the wrong framing. - The correct pattern is smaller team sizes, optimal at 5, where adding an additional person does not cost you 1-2M dollars. And then doing MORE with everyone else, also in smaller strike teams of 5. - You now have excess capacity, a fleet of aircraft carriers instead of fishing boats. - Your org need to reach for MORE, instead of trying to do the same job for less. You can reach more markets, higher complexity projects and generate more revenue. Think BIGGER, not "same company, less people." He's right, and game teams should think the same way.

Grummz

16,117 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

She’s making $10,000 a month with a cartoon bunny. Not a real character. Not a big team. Just an AI bunny named Fluffy that she created in 7 minutes. 1/4 - She takes viral kids videos 2/4 - Throws the link into ChatGPT 3/4 - Gets a prompt, and generates the whole thing inside Picsart Flow. 4/4 - Some of her videos are pulling hundreds of millions of views. YT pays from $1,000 to $10,000+ for 1 million views on long format vids While most people are still trying to come up with original ideas and burning out… She’s copying what’s already working, turning it into AI content, and letting it print. This is one of the fastest and dumbest ways to make money on YouTube right now. Most people will watch this and think it’s too good to be true. The ones who actually try it are going to be in a completely different position in a few months. Watch exactly how she’s doing it 👇 Follow me if you want to see EXACT step-by-step guide. I will post iton my X shortly, notifs on!
0:52

She’s making $10,000 a month with a cartoon bunny. Not a real character. Not a big team. Just an AI bunny named Fluffy that she created in 7 minutes. 1/4 - She takes viral kids videos 2/4 - Throws the link into ChatGPT 3/4 - Gets a prompt, and generates the whole thing inside Picsart Flow. 4/4 - Some of her videos are pulling hundreds of millions of views. YT pays from $1,000 to $10,000+ for 1 million views on long format vids While most people are still trying to come up with original ideas and burning out… She’s copying what’s already working, turning it into AI content, and letting it print. This is one of the fastest and dumbest ways to make money on YouTube right now. Most people will watch this and think it’s too good to be true. The ones who actually try it are going to be in a completely different position in a few months. Watch exactly how she’s doing it 👇 Follow me if you want to see EXACT step-by-step guide. I will post iton my X shortly, notifs on!

Frogify

58,724 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

BROKEN HALLELUYAH is one movie I recommend to everyone irrespective of religion… On Monday 4th June 2016 around 10am, our 1-year marriage anniversary, my wife called me & was literally sobbing on the phone. 2 things break me on the instant & could make me cry - my wife in tears & my kids in pain. She called telling me she was tired & why has God not given us a baby. I felt her pain, pulse, tears & I had shivers all over. I didn’t know what to say. Now, you could say it’s just one year, how about those who had to wait for donkey years; but not everyone has the strength for a long period of waiting. God has said He would not make us go through what is beyond our strength. One thing you must understand each time you are going through a tough time is that God is aware & He knows you have the strength to go through it till your miracle comes. As she dropped the call, I knew this woman doesn’t have strength for a long wait. I walked into the empty board room, knelt down & I cried out to God begging Him that for the sake of my wife, He should just give us a baby. I don’t have issues as it’s just 1-year & it could very well happen within the 2nd year, but this isn’t about me cos I don’t know what this would further do to her, as she isn’t so mentally rugged like that. Just about a 10-minute heartfelt prayer to God. That very week, my wife conceived & we welcomed our bundle of joy 9 months later. Truth is that we go through these tough moments, not to break us or to punish us, but to make us better people. Today, my wife is one of the toughest women I know. Sometimes she lifts me when I’m down.
4:59

BROKEN HALLELUYAH is one movie I recommend to everyone irrespective of religion… On Monday 4th June 2016 around 10am, our 1-year marriage anniversary, my wife called me & was literally sobbing on the phone. 2 things break me on the instant & could make me cry - my wife in tears & my kids in pain. She called telling me she was tired & why has God not given us a baby. I felt her pain, pulse, tears & I had shivers all over. I didn’t know what to say. Now, you could say it’s just one year, how about those who had to wait for donkey years; but not everyone has the strength for a long period of waiting. God has said He would not make us go through what is beyond our strength. One thing you must understand each time you are going through a tough time is that God is aware & He knows you have the strength to go through it till your miracle comes. As she dropped the call, I knew this woman doesn’t have strength for a long wait. I walked into the empty board room, knelt down & I cried out to God begging Him that for the sake of my wife, He should just give us a baby. I don’t have issues as it’s just 1-year & it could very well happen within the 2nd year, but this isn’t about me cos I don’t know what this would further do to her, as she isn’t so mentally rugged like that. Just about a 10-minute heartfelt prayer to God. That very week, my wife conceived & we welcomed our bundle of joy 9 months later. Truth is that we go through these tough moments, not to break us or to punish us, but to make us better people. Today, my wife is one of the toughest women I know. Sometimes she lifts me when I’m down.

DON “Tobechukwu” Ade 👑

52,230 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yesterday, iVisionSR and BennoJr attempted to rob $1,262 from our tournament prizepool solely relying on the fact that no one else in the tournament spoke Dutch. Here's the breakdown of the leaderboard that we THOUGHT happened based on scores submitted 1. BennoJr, iVisionSR, (3rd not named) - 177.6 2. Bread, Lulla, Skullface - 176.15 That was until 3 separate viewers came forward with translations from Vision & Benno's stream (since been unpublished, however I have the clips), indicating they had purposefully miscalculated their score in order to beat us by a little over a point. Here's how the leaderboard looks without their false reporting 1. Bread, Lulla, Skullface - 176.15 2. BennoJr, iVisionSR, (3rd not named) - 175.4 Translated from their Vod (clip below) iVision: "Um Benno, You have to add an extra point to our score yes?" Benno: "Yes that's ok." iVision: "or just add 10 or something" Benno: "Yes I will" iVision: "Then you can say, the 0 was added by accident" Benno: "Or we should add a placement, I'm going to add extra placement" On top of purposefully reporting their scores incorrectly to take 1st over 2nd, they also attempted to have points taken away from us for an infraction that occurred in the first game (accidental portable Radar throw from Lulla). The Admin reviewed and decided that unless there was any kills or info taken from this, it was an accident and shouldn't be punished as all three of us died right after. I have absolutely no gripe with people trying to debate rules and the integrity of the tournament, that's completely fine. The Admin will always determine the outcome of those scenarios, that's what they exist for. What I have an issue with, and can't comprehend myself, is that not only would they attempt to take points away from us for an infraction that changed nothing (petty is what I would call it at the bare minimum) but go out of their way to lie about their scores in such a blatant way, thinking no one would fact check them when $2,000 is on the line. The balls it takes to be lying while attempting to "bring justice" is insane. Their incorrect score reports are shown here Game 2: Kills (11) Placement (7th - 1.3x) Actual Game 2: Kills (11) Placement (5th - 1.5x) Game 4: Kills (4) Placement (28th - 1.1x) Actual Game 4: Kills (4) Placement (25th - 1.2x) Game 6: Kills (12) Placement (15th - 1.2x) Actual Game 6: Kills (12) Placement (13th - 1.2x) Netting them an extra 2.2 points (just enough to beat us) These score miscalculations would regularly seem like such a minor difference, but when the leaderboard is so close like it was yesterday, it is clear they were trying to beat the system. People break rules in tournaments all the time, knowingly or unknowingly. I died to a Katt AMR yesterday when they were banned, die to portable radars all of the time while they're banned, and still do not lie about my scores with money involved. I look at this situation similar to cheating. Vision and Benno purposefully attempted to take 1st while rightfully in 2nd place, the difference of $1,262 for their team or $148.50. None of this ever would've been found if not for a couple different viewers taking the time to translate their conversations. Thank you Flexxal, Parteroni, SuperJoe, Johan, and Lulla for taking the time to go through their scores. Second clip translation Vision: "Benno, you can't deal with numbers. Actually, you shouldn't do those scores at all things are going completely wrong changing and stuff. If they ask why did you do it, just say I'm bad with numbers." Benno: "Yes, I have discalculate. That's when you see a 1 instead of a 4, I'm just going to say that my parents taught me to round up haha." I can't describe how unhappy this whole situation makes me. If they're willing to ruin the integrity of a Twitter tournament, imagine what lengths they'd go to when real money is involved. All other proof will be linked below if you're interested in viewing it, I cannot believe how grimy people can be over money. Lastly, they will clearly never be invited to another one of our tournaments again, and hopefully others catch on. This type of behavior cannot be ramified short-term, it is stealing.
0:31

Yesterday, iVisionSR and BennoJr attempted to rob $1,262 from our tournament prizepool solely relying on the fact that no one else in the tournament spoke Dutch. Here's the breakdown of the leaderboard that we THOUGHT happened based on scores submitted 1. BennoJr, iVisionSR, (3rd not named) - 177.6 2. Bread, Lulla, Skullface - 176.15 That was until 3 separate viewers came forward with translations from Vision & Benno's stream (since been unpublished, however I have the clips), indicating they had purposefully miscalculated their score in order to beat us by a little over a point. Here's how the leaderboard looks without their false reporting 1. Bread, Lulla, Skullface - 176.15 2. BennoJr, iVisionSR, (3rd not named) - 175.4 Translated from their Vod (clip below) iVision: "Um Benno, You have to add an extra point to our score yes?" Benno: "Yes that's ok." iVision: "or just add 10 or something" Benno: "Yes I will" iVision: "Then you can say, the 0 was added by accident" Benno: "Or we should add a placement, I'm going to add extra placement" On top of purposefully reporting their scores incorrectly to take 1st over 2nd, they also attempted to have points taken away from us for an infraction that occurred in the first game (accidental portable Radar throw from Lulla). The Admin reviewed and decided that unless there was any kills or info taken from this, it was an accident and shouldn't be punished as all three of us died right after. I have absolutely no gripe with people trying to debate rules and the integrity of the tournament, that's completely fine. The Admin will always determine the outcome of those scenarios, that's what they exist for. What I have an issue with, and can't comprehend myself, is that not only would they attempt to take points away from us for an infraction that changed nothing (petty is what I would call it at the bare minimum) but go out of their way to lie about their scores in such a blatant way, thinking no one would fact check them when $2,000 is on the line. The balls it takes to be lying while attempting to "bring justice" is insane. Their incorrect score reports are shown here Game 2: Kills (11) Placement (7th - 1.3x) Actual Game 2: Kills (11) Placement (5th - 1.5x) Game 4: Kills (4) Placement (28th - 1.1x) Actual Game 4: Kills (4) Placement (25th - 1.2x) Game 6: Kills (12) Placement (15th - 1.2x) Actual Game 6: Kills (12) Placement (13th - 1.2x) Netting them an extra 2.2 points (just enough to beat us) These score miscalculations would regularly seem like such a minor difference, but when the leaderboard is so close like it was yesterday, it is clear they were trying to beat the system. People break rules in tournaments all the time, knowingly or unknowingly. I died to a Katt AMR yesterday when they were banned, die to portable radars all of the time while they're banned, and still do not lie about my scores with money involved. I look at this situation similar to cheating. Vision and Benno purposefully attempted to take 1st while rightfully in 2nd place, the difference of $1,262 for their team or $148.50. None of this ever would've been found if not for a couple different viewers taking the time to translate their conversations. Thank you Flexxal, Parteroni, SuperJoe, Johan, and Lulla for taking the time to go through their scores. Second clip translation Vision: "Benno, you can't deal with numbers. Actually, you shouldn't do those scores at all things are going completely wrong changing and stuff. If they ask why did you do it, just say I'm bad with numbers." Benno: "Yes, I have discalculate. That's when you see a 1 instead of a 4, I'm just going to say that my parents taught me to round up haha." I can't describe how unhappy this whole situation makes me. If they're willing to ruin the integrity of a Twitter tournament, imagine what lengths they'd go to when real money is involved. All other proof will be linked below if you're interested in viewing it, I cannot believe how grimy people can be over money. Lastly, they will clearly never be invited to another one of our tournaments again, and hopefully others catch on. This type of behavior cannot be ramified short-term, it is stealing.

bread

1,637,815 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Stanford professor just gave away the entire foundation of how AI Agents & automation actually works. 1-hour lecture. Tool calling. Multi-step workflows. Planning. Reflection. SAVE this to watch this before you open Netflix tonight. More valuable than 6 months of copying Make and n8n tutorials, for building Ai Agents Most people learn by copying tutorials blindly. Stanford teaches you WHY agents work the way they do. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your skills forward instead of just entertaining you for 30 seconds. ↓ Why your automations keep breaking. You copied a Make tutorial. Built the exact workflow. Worked for a week. Then the API changed. The trigger failed. An edge case broke everything. You had no idea how to fix it. Because you never understood why it worked. You were copying keystrokes. The people shipping real automation were understanding architecture. ↓ What Stanford actually teaches. Tool calling: how an agent decides which tool to use by scoring each option against the current task state, not just matching keywords. ReAct loop: the agent reasons, acts, observes, then reasons again. Break this cycle and your workflow fails silently. Planning vs execution: why agents that plan all steps upfront break on dynamic inputs, and why iterative planners survive production. Memory architecture: short-term context for the current task, long-term vector memory for patterns. Most automations fail because they confuse the two. Reflection: how agents catch their own errors by evaluating outputs against original intent before moving to the next step. Tool composition: why chaining 10 tools blindly creates cascading failures, and how to structure dependencies so one broken node doesn't kill the whole workflow. This is the foundation behind every automation that actually works. Not prompting tricks. Not "10 best AI tools" reels. Actual architecture. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your skills forward. ↓ Your weekend plan. Tonight: watch the Stanford lecture. 1 hour. Saturday to Sunday: build 3 projects applying what you learned. Next 2 weekends: 6 more projects. 9 projects. 2 weeks. APIs, webhooks, LLM integration, real workflows. No theory. Just build. ↓ Stanford Agentic AI lecture: free on YouTube. Watch it this weekend or buy another $500 "AI automation course" in 2027 that teaches less than this one free lecture. Bookmark. Watch tonight. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your skills forward.
56:54

Stanford professor just gave away the entire foundation of how AI Agents & automation actually works. 1-hour lecture. Tool calling. Multi-step workflows. Planning. Reflection. SAVE this to watch this before you open Netflix tonight. More valuable than 6 months of copying Make and n8n tutorials, for building Ai Agents Most people learn by copying tutorials blindly. Stanford teaches you WHY agents work the way they do. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your skills forward instead of just entertaining you for 30 seconds. ↓ Why your automations keep breaking. You copied a Make tutorial. Built the exact workflow. Worked for a week. Then the API changed. The trigger failed. An edge case broke everything. You had no idea how to fix it. Because you never understood why it worked. You were copying keystrokes. The people shipping real automation were understanding architecture. ↓ What Stanford actually teaches. Tool calling: how an agent decides which tool to use by scoring each option against the current task state, not just matching keywords. ReAct loop: the agent reasons, acts, observes, then reasons again. Break this cycle and your workflow fails silently. Planning vs execution: why agents that plan all steps upfront break on dynamic inputs, and why iterative planners survive production. Memory architecture: short-term context for the current task, long-term vector memory for patterns. Most automations fail because they confuse the two. Reflection: how agents catch their own errors by evaluating outputs against original intent before moving to the next step. Tool composition: why chaining 10 tools blindly creates cascading failures, and how to structure dependencies so one broken node doesn't kill the whole workflow. This is the foundation behind every automation that actually works. Not prompting tricks. Not "10 best AI tools" reels. Actual architecture. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your skills forward. ↓ Your weekend plan. Tonight: watch the Stanford lecture. 1 hour. Saturday to Sunday: build 3 projects applying what you learned. Next 2 weekends: 6 more projects. 9 projects. 2 weeks. APIs, webhooks, LLM integration, real workflows. No theory. Just build. ↓ Stanford Agentic AI lecture: free on YouTube. Watch it this weekend or buy another $500 "AI automation course" in 2027 that teaches less than this one free lecture. Bookmark. Watch tonight. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more high-signal content that actually moves your skills forward.

Himanshu Kumar

28,120 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Michael Seibel on how to create a great startup pitch In the clip below, former Y Combinator CEO Michael Seibel breaks down the two types of pitches every startup founder needs: a 30-second elevator pitch and a two-minute pitch for investors. “A lot of people practice 10-minute, 30-minute, hour-long, pitches. I think that’s all garbage. I think you can get all of your points across in two minutes. And one thing I like to tell founders is that the more you talk, the more you have an opportunity to say something that people don’t like.” 30-Second Elevator Pitch: You should be able to explain to anyone you come across what your company does in 30 seconds. This should be three sentences: 1. What does your company do? Assume the person you’re talking to knows nothing. This should be a 1-sentence explanation that your mom or dad can understand (e.g. “We’re Airbnb and we allow you to rent out the extra room in your house” NOT “We’re Airbnb and we’re a marketplace for space”). 2. How big is the market? Do a couple hours of research so that you can give investors a rough approximation of the size of the market you’re in (e.g. Airbnb might give the size of online hotel booking market) 3. How much traction do you have? Ideally you can say something like: “We launched in January and we’re growing 30% month over month. We have $ X sales and Y users.” If you’re pre-launch, you need to convince investors that you’re moving quickly (e.g. “the team came together in January. By March we launched our beta. By April we launched our product.”). Two-Minute Pitch: This pitch is for people you’re actually trying to convince of something (e.g. investors, potential employees, etc.). You basically want to simply explain what you do and then ask for money. There are 5 key components: 1. Clear 30 second pitch (everything mentioned above) 2. Unique insight—what do the biggest players in your market not understand? This should be 2 sentences. 3. How do you make money? 4. Team. If your team has done something that has made investors money, you should mention that (e.g. “we’re the founders of PayPal”). If you haven’t, don’t go on about the awards you’ve won or PhDs you hold. What investors want to hear is: how many founders? (hopefully 2-4) how many of the founders are technical? (hopefully 50% or more engineers) How long have you known each other? (ideally you’ve known each other either personally or professionally for at least 6 months) Are you all full-time? 5. The Big Ask ($$$). You have to know what you’re talking about when you ask for money. Are you raising on a convertible note or a SAFE? What’s the cap of the SAFE? How much money are you raising? What’s the minimum check size? If you don’t know these things, investors won’t think you’re serious or that you haven’t done your homework.
6:34

Michael Seibel on how to create a great startup pitch In the clip below, former Y Combinator CEO Michael Seibel breaks down the two types of pitches every startup founder needs: a 30-second elevator pitch and a two-minute pitch for investors. “A lot of people practice 10-minute, 30-minute, hour-long, pitches. I think that’s all garbage. I think you can get all of your points across in two minutes. And one thing I like to tell founders is that the more you talk, the more you have an opportunity to say something that people don’t like.” 30-Second Elevator Pitch: You should be able to explain to anyone you come across what your company does in 30 seconds. This should be three sentences: 1. What does your company do? Assume the person you’re talking to knows nothing. This should be a 1-sentence explanation that your mom or dad can understand (e.g. “We’re Airbnb and we allow you to rent out the extra room in your house” NOT “We’re Airbnb and we’re a marketplace for space”). 2. How big is the market? Do a couple hours of research so that you can give investors a rough approximation of the size of the market you’re in (e.g. Airbnb might give the size of online hotel booking market) 3. How much traction do you have? Ideally you can say something like: “We launched in January and we’re growing 30% month over month. We have $ X sales and Y users.” If you’re pre-launch, you need to convince investors that you’re moving quickly (e.g. “the team came together in January. By March we launched our beta. By April we launched our product.”). Two-Minute Pitch: This pitch is for people you’re actually trying to convince of something (e.g. investors, potential employees, etc.). You basically want to simply explain what you do and then ask for money. There are 5 key components: 1. Clear 30 second pitch (everything mentioned above) 2. Unique insight—what do the biggest players in your market not understand? This should be 2 sentences. 3. How do you make money? 4. Team. If your team has done something that has made investors money, you should mention that (e.g. “we’re the founders of PayPal”). If you haven’t, don’t go on about the awards you’ve won or PhDs you hold. What investors want to hear is: how many founders? (hopefully 2-4) how many of the founders are technical? (hopefully 50% or more engineers) How long have you known each other? (ideally you’ve known each other either personally or professionally for at least 6 months) Are you all full-time? 5. The Big Ask ($$$). You have to know what you’re talking about when you ask for money. Are you raising on a convertible note or a SAFE? What’s the cap of the SAFE? How much money are you raising? What’s the minimum check size? If you don’t know these things, investors won’t think you’re serious or that you haven’t done your homework.

Startup Archive

80,357 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Putting the entire debate I had this evening on IndiaToday out- no edits, no cuts- full debate. Do watch & see THE DEBATE ENDED WITH ABUSES HURLED AT ME BY Rajdeep Sardesai - CALLED ME CRETIN, LOW LEVEL Here’s what happened.. 1) Despite me requesting Rajdeep Sardesai to let me complete- which he did not do last evening - he again interrupts me within 20 seconds of my first remarks after his long opening - literally within 20 seconds!! ((It was not a fact check )) 2) I call out Rajdeep jovially , without any anger, for his constant interruptions and wonder why he needs to peddle a congress narrative rather than hear me fully. 3) Preeti, far from stopping him, starts behaving rudely & says I was on her show to seek “2 mins of fame” not aware of the fact that BJP assigns us- we don’t get to choose & also forgetting that her show is the last place one would get fame - for that people need to watch her show THE SAME PREETI , RAJDEEP NOT ONCE INTERJECT SANJAY JHA FOR HIS VERBAL DIATRIBE ON PM Narendra Modi LABELLING HIM DICTATORIAL & FASCIST! She shouts at me because I request Rajdeep to not be biased and interrupt me constantly when I was fact checking them and defending my party and leader. 4) Rajdeep continues to interrupt when Preeti assures me 45 seconds- dramatically puts on a timer- Rajdeep still interrupts me in 14 seconds! Preeti watches on… 5) Preeti screams at me. Multiple times. Literally screams.. I remind her we should be courteous but it has no effect. 6) Rajdeep gets an ending comment which I am not allowed to counter.. (Panel was Sanjay Jha, Rajdeep, Me & of course the anchor Preeti) 7) Preeti closes show, without allowing me even 10 seconds to respond to Rajdeep and twists my statement on 7 days aspect and completely misquotes me ( Do watch the debate till the end to see if that is what I said and HOW SHE COMPLETELY MISQUOTES- it isn’t even funny leave alone ethical) 8) After the debate, when cameras go off, Rajdeep hurls abuses at me- calls me a cretin and low level. (Shouts at me along the hall way and elevator even as I tell him I do not wish to talk ) - I am sure other cameras have captured this. Rajdeep in the past has asked Sambit Patra to shut up, allowed Supriya Srinate to call me a goon on national tv and justified it. (Videos are available ) The full debate is here for everyone to see Aroon Purie supriya prasad - unedited Dear Aroon ji, 1) Can your journalist , for any reason, call me cretin and low level? Let us assume I am completely wrong- even then is this justified? Is it a crime for me keep the version my party trusts me to? 2) Can your anchor say I am here for two mins of fame when my party has chosen to send me? Same anchor does not stop Sanjay Jha once for making most despicable comments on PM Narendra Modi but if I defend my party and leader I am abused? 3) Can your anchor twist my words and misquote me blatantly at the end? 4) If somebody interrupts every fifteen seconds and I call out their pro-Congress tilt- This is what is being justified by abusing and shouting at me ? Merely because I wish to factually rebut allegations thrown at my party? The full debate is here for everyone to see & decide. Link : BJP Anil Baluni
21:50

Putting the entire debate I had this evening on IndiaToday out- no edits, no cuts- full debate. Do watch & see THE DEBATE ENDED WITH ABUSES HURLED AT ME BY Rajdeep Sardesai - CALLED ME CRETIN, LOW LEVEL Here’s what happened.. 1) Despite me requesting Rajdeep Sardesai to let me complete- which he did not do last evening - he again interrupts me within 20 seconds of my first remarks after his long opening - literally within 20 seconds!! ((It was not a fact check )) 2) I call out Rajdeep jovially , without any anger, for his constant interruptions and wonder why he needs to peddle a congress narrative rather than hear me fully. 3) Preeti, far from stopping him, starts behaving rudely & says I was on her show to seek “2 mins of fame” not aware of the fact that BJP assigns us- we don’t get to choose & also forgetting that her show is the last place one would get fame - for that people need to watch her show THE SAME PREETI , RAJDEEP NOT ONCE INTERJECT SANJAY JHA FOR HIS VERBAL DIATRIBE ON PM Narendra Modi LABELLING HIM DICTATORIAL & FASCIST! She shouts at me because I request Rajdeep to not be biased and interrupt me constantly when I was fact checking them and defending my party and leader. 4) Rajdeep continues to interrupt when Preeti assures me 45 seconds- dramatically puts on a timer- Rajdeep still interrupts me in 14 seconds! Preeti watches on… 5) Preeti screams at me. Multiple times. Literally screams.. I remind her we should be courteous but it has no effect. 6) Rajdeep gets an ending comment which I am not allowed to counter.. (Panel was Sanjay Jha, Rajdeep, Me & of course the anchor Preeti) 7) Preeti closes show, without allowing me even 10 seconds to respond to Rajdeep and twists my statement on 7 days aspect and completely misquotes me ( Do watch the debate till the end to see if that is what I said and HOW SHE COMPLETELY MISQUOTES- it isn’t even funny leave alone ethical) 8) After the debate, when cameras go off, Rajdeep hurls abuses at me- calls me a cretin and low level. (Shouts at me along the hall way and elevator even as I tell him I do not wish to talk ) - I am sure other cameras have captured this. Rajdeep in the past has asked Sambit Patra to shut up, allowed Supriya Srinate to call me a goon on national tv and justified it. (Videos are available ) The full debate is here for everyone to see Aroon Purie supriya prasad - unedited Dear Aroon ji, 1) Can your journalist , for any reason, call me cretin and low level? Let us assume I am completely wrong- even then is this justified? Is it a crime for me keep the version my party trusts me to? 2) Can your anchor say I am here for two mins of fame when my party has chosen to send me? Same anchor does not stop Sanjay Jha once for making most despicable comments on PM Narendra Modi but if I defend my party and leader I am abused? 3) Can your anchor twist my words and misquote me blatantly at the end? 4) If somebody interrupts every fifteen seconds and I call out their pro-Congress tilt- This is what is being justified by abusing and shouting at me ? Merely because I wish to factually rebut allegations thrown at my party? The full debate is here for everyone to see & decide. Link : BJP Anil Baluni

Shehzad Jai Hind (Chowkidar as per INC ecosystem)

3,485,674 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Using A Carnivore Elimination Diet To Heal GERD How I Eliminated 15yrs of Chronic PPI Proton Pump Inhibitor Medications(Nexium, Aciphex & Prilosec): Adopting A Ketogenic Proper Human Diet & Going As Strict As Needed To Eliminate Symptoms. For me, that meant in order for my Stomach & Esophagus to heal I needed to eat Beef only. Using Carnivore as an Elimination Diet allows for discovering how each item encourages healing or is harmful & flares symptoms. The following items worsened my reflux & needed to be eliminated until complete healing took place: vegetables, coffee, tea, spices, sausage, pork, chicken & eggs. Very Slow Taper Of PPI Meds To Eliminate & Prevent Severe Rebound Reflux. Start Taper Only After Achieving No GERD Symptoms On The Ketogenic Diet. All of the GERD trigger foods need to be identified first & eliminated prior to tapering medications. Cut tablets in 1/2 dose per day - or - a full dose every other day. Stay On This For 2 Weeks, Then Cut Dose In 1/2 Again -or- full dose every 3rd day. Continue this taper pattern in 2 week cycles. Keep Tapering Until Off Meds Completely. When GERD Free & PPI Free, reintroduce 1 food, drink or spice item at a time & watch for GERD symptoms to resurface & evaluate. At 7yrs healed, I have been able to add items back in since year 2. Coffee, Tea, Eggs, Sausage, Pork & Chicken are back into my way of eating with no issues or recurrence of symptoms. Vegetables & Spices are gone long term, not because of GERD symptoms but because many are high in harmful Oxalates. 9 illnesses that healed were from Oxalate Toxicity, from over consumption of High Oxalate foods daily, prior to 2017. You are your own n=1 Experiment. You can heal by discovering which foods or beverages or spices are triggers for GERD, eliminating them until symptoms are gone & stomach/esophagus heals, taper off of meds, then reintroduce the eliminated foods. My Twitter friend Ken D Berry MD describes exactly what I did to heal GERD.
0:59

Using A Carnivore Elimination Diet To Heal GERD How I Eliminated 15yrs of Chronic PPI Proton Pump Inhibitor Medications(Nexium, Aciphex & Prilosec): Adopting A Ketogenic Proper Human Diet & Going As Strict As Needed To Eliminate Symptoms. For me, that meant in order for my Stomach & Esophagus to heal I needed to eat Beef only. Using Carnivore as an Elimination Diet allows for discovering how each item encourages healing or is harmful & flares symptoms. The following items worsened my reflux & needed to be eliminated until complete healing took place: vegetables, coffee, tea, spices, sausage, pork, chicken & eggs. Very Slow Taper Of PPI Meds To Eliminate & Prevent Severe Rebound Reflux. Start Taper Only After Achieving No GERD Symptoms On The Ketogenic Diet. All of the GERD trigger foods need to be identified first & eliminated prior to tapering medications. Cut tablets in 1/2 dose per day - or - a full dose every other day. Stay On This For 2 Weeks, Then Cut Dose In 1/2 Again -or- full dose every 3rd day. Continue this taper pattern in 2 week cycles. Keep Tapering Until Off Meds Completely. When GERD Free & PPI Free, reintroduce 1 food, drink or spice item at a time & watch for GERD symptoms to resurface & evaluate. At 7yrs healed, I have been able to add items back in since year 2. Coffee, Tea, Eggs, Sausage, Pork & Chicken are back into my way of eating with no issues or recurrence of symptoms. Vegetables & Spices are gone long term, not because of GERD symptoms but because many are high in harmful Oxalates. 9 illnesses that healed were from Oxalate Toxicity, from over consumption of High Oxalate foods daily, prior to 2017. You are your own n=1 Experiment. You can heal by discovering which foods or beverages or spices are triggers for GERD, eliminating them until symptoms are gone & stomach/esophagus heals, taper off of meds, then reintroduce the eliminated foods. My Twitter friend Ken D Berry MD describes exactly what I did to heal GERD.

Valerie Anne Smith

56,350 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

YouTube just made FIFA World Cup clips monetizable. 1M views pays up to $15,000. The tournament started June 11. Soccer Shorts are pulling 12M views while you read this. Old way: download clips, cut for hours in CapCut, eat a copyright strike, earn $0. New way takes 10 minutes. Step 1 Connect. Open Claude → Customize → Connectors → hit the +. Add a video MCP connector. Done in 30 seconds. Step 2 Hunt. Search “FIFA World Cup clips” on YouTube. FIFA’s own channel sits at 26.3M subscribers. Their compilations pull 1.5M to 12M views each. Pick one, copy the URL. Step 3 Prompt. “Clip this video into viral YouTube Shorts formats” then paste the URL. That’s the whole prompt. 1 sentence. Step 4 Watch. Claude finds the peaks, cuts 3 vertical 9:16 Shorts, picks the font, burns in captions, writes the titles. “Mbappé Turns The World Cup Final In 97 Seconds” it named that one itself. The math: 3 Shorts per clip. 10 clips a day. 30 Shorts daily without filming, editing, or showing your face. Shorts pay less per view than long-form so you win on volume, not RPM. The window: the final is July 19. 37 days of the biggest sporting event on earth, monetizable for the first time. Most creators will watch the games. A few will clip them.
0:23

YouTube just made FIFA World Cup clips monetizable. 1M views pays up to $15,000. The tournament started June 11. Soccer Shorts are pulling 12M views while you read this. Old way: download clips, cut for hours in CapCut, eat a copyright strike, earn $0. New way takes 10 minutes. Step 1 Connect. Open Claude → Customize → Connectors → hit the +. Add a video MCP connector. Done in 30 seconds. Step 2 Hunt. Search “FIFA World Cup clips” on YouTube. FIFA’s own channel sits at 26.3M subscribers. Their compilations pull 1.5M to 12M views each. Pick one, copy the URL. Step 3 Prompt. “Clip this video into viral YouTube Shorts formats” then paste the URL. That’s the whole prompt. 1 sentence. Step 4 Watch. Claude finds the peaks, cuts 3 vertical 9:16 Shorts, picks the font, burns in captions, writes the titles. “Mbappé Turns The World Cup Final In 97 Seconds” it named that one itself. The math: 3 Shorts per clip. 10 clips a day. 30 Shorts daily without filming, editing, or showing your face. Shorts pay less per view than long-form so you win on volume, not RPM. The window: the final is July 19. 37 days of the biggest sporting event on earth, monetizable for the first time. Most creators will watch the games. A few will clip them.

Spike 1%

269,774 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Happy Maid Monday ^.^ Today I want to try something a little different I want to write a little hot kig fiction. I never done it before but her I go! #kigurumi #着ぐるみ Part:1 I shouldn’t have never taken that bet but here I am. Locking myself up for hours 8 as anime doll while my friend/new master eyes me down with hungry eyes. After hearing the the timer count down and beep I felt a strange sensation hit my chest and in between my legs. Part:2 Soon after I began dusting and cleaning his room for a few hours. It was hard work but I was able to get it done. With a sigh of relief I threw myself on the bed and shut my eyes not knowing what’s to come. A few minutes after i felt a cold hand grab my thigh then another grabbing something else. I tried to resist but I was too tried to fight back. And At that moment I didn’t feel like a human but I did feel like a real doll. So I Laid there helplessly as my new owner plays with my body for the rest of the night. Part:3 After a long night of passionate groping, I eventually feel asleep. The morning light crept through the window cause me to wake up . I noticed I was still dress as a cute little doll but to my horror I noticed the lock was still on. I tried shaking and tugging on the lock but it was in vain .He locked me in while I was asleep and this time I don’t know for how long. It Could’ve been for an hour or 24 hours !? Only he knows. But he must’ve heard my whimpers cause soon after he walks into the room with those hungry eyes and gets ready to play with his new doll.
1:33

Happy Maid Monday ^.^ Today I want to try something a little different I want to write a little hot kig fiction. I never done it before but her I go! #kigurumi #着ぐるみ Part:1 I shouldn’t have never taken that bet but here I am. Locking myself up for hours 8 as anime doll while my friend/new master eyes me down with hungry eyes. After hearing the the timer count down and beep I felt a strange sensation hit my chest and in between my legs. Part:2 Soon after I began dusting and cleaning his room for a few hours. It was hard work but I was able to get it done. With a sigh of relief I threw myself on the bed and shut my eyes not knowing what’s to come. A few minutes after i felt a cold hand grab my thigh then another grabbing something else. I tried to resist but I was too tried to fight back. And At that moment I didn’t feel like a human but I did feel like a real doll. So I Laid there helplessly as my new owner plays with my body for the rest of the night. Part:3 After a long night of passionate groping, I eventually feel asleep. The morning light crept through the window cause me to wake up . I noticed I was still dress as a cute little doll but to my horror I noticed the lock was still on. I tried shaking and tugging on the lock but it was in vain .He locked me in while I was asleep and this time I don’t know for how long. It Could’ve been for an hour or 24 hours !? Only he knows. But he must’ve heard my whimpers cause soon after he walks into the room with those hungry eyes and gets ready to play with his new doll.

MaidKigMelia

19,693 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

gave my dad a polymarket tutorial on New Year's Eve he's 58, never used crypto in his life thought i was explaining how to lose money two months later he texts me a screenshot $34,200 profit "is this normal son?" /// new year's eve party at my parents house everyone drinking dad corners me in the kitchen "so what is it you actually do again?" third time explaining this year "prediction markets, betting on outcomes with AI bots" he laughs "sounds like a good way to go broke" /// i pull out my phone: show him my polymarket dashboard $67K profit last 6 weeks he stops laughing "wait that's real money?" "yeah" "how" /// i give him the 2-minute version: binance updates BTC price every 10 milliseconds polymarket updates every 500 milliseconds there's a gap bots exploit the gap "so it's like... front-running?" "basically yeah" he's interested now /// january 2nd: dad calls me "can you set me up with one of those bots?" "dad you don't know anything about crypto" "i know how to follow instructions" he's serious /// i go over to help: spend 3 hours setting everything up OpenClaw on his old desktop polymarket account $800 from his savings "just let it run, don't touch anything" "that's it?" "that's it" /// week 1: he calls me every day "it made another trade" "yeah that's what it does" "but i didn't do anything" "correct" "this feels illegal" "it's not, it's just fast" /// week 2: calls stop i text him "how's the bot?" "good" "how good?" "$4,100" wait what /// i drive over: he's in his office watching the terminal like it's the super bowl $800 → $4,100 in two weeks "dad are you... are you ok?" "this is better than my retirement account" he's not wrong /// week 4: he stops calling me starts texting screenshots instead $4,100 → $9,800 $9,800 → $14,200 $14,200 → $19,100 "dad you need to take some profits" "why" "risk management" "it hasn't lost a trade yet" he's becoming a degen in real-time /// week 8: valentine's day dinner my mom mentions something "your father's been acting weird" "how so?" "he keeps checking his computer during meals" "oh no" /// i text him: "mom says you're obsessed" "tell her i'm up $34K" "absolutely not" "fine but i am" /// yesterday: he texts me at 11 PM screenshot $34,200 total profit "is this normal son?" "no dad this is insane" "so should i stop?" "probably" "ok" 2 minutes later "i'm not stopping" /// this morning: my mom calls "your father wants to quit his job" "WHAT" "he showed me some computer thing with a lot of money" "how did he explain it?" "he said a robot makes him $800 per day while he sleeps" she's not wrong /// called dad: "you can't quit your job" "why not" "you've been doing this for 8 weeks" "and i made $34K, your mom made $0 at her job in 8 weeks" "that's not how this works" "the bot doesn't care how long i've been doing this" he has a point /// the evolution: january 1: "sounds like a scam" january 15: "it made another trade!" february 1: cautiously optimistic february 14: checking it at dinner march 1: "should i quit my job?" /// most 58-year-olds: - scared of technology - think crypto is a scam - planning retirement in 7 years - saving $500/month if lucky my dad: - running autonomous AI bot - $34K in 8 weeks - considering quitting his job - robot makes more than his salary /// he just texted again "talked to your uncle, he wants one too" oh god it's spreading /// copytrade before your dad outperforms you: should i talk him out of quitting or is he actually onto something?
0:25

gave my dad a polymarket tutorial on New Year's Eve he's 58, never used crypto in his life thought i was explaining how to lose money two months later he texts me a screenshot $34,200 profit "is this normal son?" /// new year's eve party at my parents house everyone drinking dad corners me in the kitchen "so what is it you actually do again?" third time explaining this year "prediction markets, betting on outcomes with AI bots" he laughs "sounds like a good way to go broke" /// i pull out my phone: show him my polymarket dashboard $67K profit last 6 weeks he stops laughing "wait that's real money?" "yeah" "how" /// i give him the 2-minute version: binance updates BTC price every 10 milliseconds polymarket updates every 500 milliseconds there's a gap bots exploit the gap "so it's like... front-running?" "basically yeah" he's interested now /// january 2nd: dad calls me "can you set me up with one of those bots?" "dad you don't know anything about crypto" "i know how to follow instructions" he's serious /// i go over to help: spend 3 hours setting everything up OpenClaw on his old desktop polymarket account $800 from his savings "just let it run, don't touch anything" "that's it?" "that's it" /// week 1: he calls me every day "it made another trade" "yeah that's what it does" "but i didn't do anything" "correct" "this feels illegal" "it's not, it's just fast" /// week 2: calls stop i text him "how's the bot?" "good" "how good?" "$4,100" wait what /// i drive over: he's in his office watching the terminal like it's the super bowl $800 → $4,100 in two weeks "dad are you... are you ok?" "this is better than my retirement account" he's not wrong /// week 4: he stops calling me starts texting screenshots instead $4,100 → $9,800 $9,800 → $14,200 $14,200 → $19,100 "dad you need to take some profits" "why" "risk management" "it hasn't lost a trade yet" he's becoming a degen in real-time /// week 8: valentine's day dinner my mom mentions something "your father's been acting weird" "how so?" "he keeps checking his computer during meals" "oh no" /// i text him: "mom says you're obsessed" "tell her i'm up $34K" "absolutely not" "fine but i am" /// yesterday: he texts me at 11 PM screenshot $34,200 total profit "is this normal son?" "no dad this is insane" "so should i stop?" "probably" "ok" 2 minutes later "i'm not stopping" /// this morning: my mom calls "your father wants to quit his job" "WHAT" "he showed me some computer thing with a lot of money" "how did he explain it?" "he said a robot makes him $800 per day while he sleeps" she's not wrong /// called dad: "you can't quit your job" "why not" "you've been doing this for 8 weeks" "and i made $34K, your mom made $0 at her job in 8 weeks" "that's not how this works" "the bot doesn't care how long i've been doing this" he has a point /// the evolution: january 1: "sounds like a scam" january 15: "it made another trade!" february 1: cautiously optimistic february 14: checking it at dinner march 1: "should i quit my job?" /// most 58-year-olds: - scared of technology - think crypto is a scam - planning retirement in 7 years - saving $500/month if lucky my dad: - running autonomous AI bot - $34K in 8 weeks - considering quitting his job - robot makes more than his salary /// he just texted again "talked to your uncle, he wants one too" oh god it's spreading /// copytrade before your dad outperforms you: should i talk him out of quitting or is he actually onto something?

ZER

12,783 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Michael Seibel on how to create a great startup pitch Former Y Combinator CEO Michael Seibel breaks down the two types of pitches every startup founder needs: a 30-second elevator pitch and a two-minute pitch for investors. “A lot of people practice 10-minute, 30-minute, hour-long, pitches. I think that’s all garbage. I think you can get all of your points across in two minutes. And one thing I like to tell founders is that the more you talk, the more you have an opportunity to say something that people don’t like.” 30-Second Elevator Pitch: You should be able to explain to anyone you come across what your company does in 30 seconds. This should be three sentences: • What does your company do? Assume the person you’re talking to knows nothing. This should be a 1-sentence explanation that your mom or dad can understand (e.g. “We’re Airbnb and we allow you to rent out the extra room in your house” NOT “We’re Airbnb and we’re a marketplace for space”). • How big is the market? Do a couple hours of research so that you can give investors a rough approximation of the size of the market you’re in (e.g. Airbnb might give the size of online hotel booking market) • How much traction do you have? Ideally you can say something like: “We launched in January and we’re growing 30% month over month. We have SX sales and Y users.” If you’re pre-launch, you need to convince investors that you’re moving quickly (e.g. “the team came together in January. By March we launched our beta. By April we launched our product.”). Two-Minute Pitch: This pitch is for people you’re actually trying to convince of something (e.g. investors, potential employees, etc.). You basically want to simply explain what you do and then ask for money. There are 5 key components: • Clear 30 second pitch (everything mentioned above) • Unique insight—what do the biggest players in your market not understand? This should be 2 sentences. • How do you make money? • Team. If your team has done something that has made investors money, you should mention that (e.g. “we’re the founders of PayPal”). If you haven’t, don’t go on about the awards you’ve won or PhDs you hold. What investors want to hear is: how many founders? (hopefully 2-4) how many of the founders are technical? (hopefully 50% or more engineers) How long have you known each other? (ideally you’ve known each other either personally or professionally for at least 6 months) Are you all full-time? • The Big Ask ($$$). You have to know what you’re talking about when you ask for money. Are you raising on a convertible note or a SAFE? What’s the cap of the SAFE? How much money are you raising? What’s the minimum check size? If you don’t know these things, investors won’t think you’re serious or that you haven’t done your homework.
7:26

Michael Seibel on how to create a great startup pitch Former Y Combinator CEO Michael Seibel breaks down the two types of pitches every startup founder needs: a 30-second elevator pitch and a two-minute pitch for investors. “A lot of people practice 10-minute, 30-minute, hour-long, pitches. I think that’s all garbage. I think you can get all of your points across in two minutes. And one thing I like to tell founders is that the more you talk, the more you have an opportunity to say something that people don’t like.” 30-Second Elevator Pitch: You should be able to explain to anyone you come across what your company does in 30 seconds. This should be three sentences: • What does your company do? Assume the person you’re talking to knows nothing. This should be a 1-sentence explanation that your mom or dad can understand (e.g. “We’re Airbnb and we allow you to rent out the extra room in your house” NOT “We’re Airbnb and we’re a marketplace for space”). • How big is the market? Do a couple hours of research so that you can give investors a rough approximation of the size of the market you’re in (e.g. Airbnb might give the size of online hotel booking market) • How much traction do you have? Ideally you can say something like: “We launched in January and we’re growing 30% month over month. We have SX sales and Y users.” If you’re pre-launch, you need to convince investors that you’re moving quickly (e.g. “the team came together in January. By March we launched our beta. By April we launched our product.”). Two-Minute Pitch: This pitch is for people you’re actually trying to convince of something (e.g. investors, potential employees, etc.). You basically want to simply explain what you do and then ask for money. There are 5 key components: • Clear 30 second pitch (everything mentioned above) • Unique insight—what do the biggest players in your market not understand? This should be 2 sentences. • How do you make money? • Team. If your team has done something that has made investors money, you should mention that (e.g. “we’re the founders of PayPal”). If you haven’t, don’t go on about the awards you’ve won or PhDs you hold. What investors want to hear is: how many founders? (hopefully 2-4) how many of the founders are technical? (hopefully 50% or more engineers) How long have you known each other? (ideally you’ve known each other either personally or professionally for at least 6 months) Are you all full-time? • The Big Ask ($$$). You have to know what you’re talking about when you ask for money. Are you raising on a convertible note or a SAFE? What’s the cap of the SAFE? How much money are you raising? What’s the minimum check size? If you don’t know these things, investors won’t think you’re serious or that you haven’t done your homework.

Startup Archive

21,631 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A programmer found a bug in the laws of probability. Now he collects $35,000 a day for exploiting it. How do you make money betting against yourself? Sounds like idiocy. Looks like $236,000 in pure profit. 2 months ago this wallet did not exist. Today it holds $236,000 in pure profit. He does not read news. Does not watch charts. Does not listen to analysts. He just sees the moment when math breaks. And takes the difference. I found this wallet buried in the 15-minute leaderboard. First thought: another HFT bot catching milliseconds. I was wrong. The exploit is public. So is the wallet: First thing that crashed my brain. This bot does not bet on direction. It does not care if the price falls or rises. It bets on BOTH outcomes. Simultaneously. How do you make money betting against yourself? I broke down the mechanics and felt like an idiot. Here is the glitch this script exploits: On Polymarket every market has two outcomes: YES and NO. In a perfect world their sum always equals $1.00. But we do not live in a perfect world. We live in a world of panic, FOMO, and people staring at charts at 3am. When volatility spikes, the crowd goes insane. YES price flies to 60 cents. NO drops to 35. Total cost of both outcomes: 95 cents. The bot sees this instantly. It buys YES. It buys NO. Same second. Investment: 95 cents.сGuaranteed payout: $1.00. Profit: 5 cents. Does not matter where the price goes. To zero or to the moon. The bot already won before anything happened. Now multiply this by hundreds of trades per day. 5 cents becomes $50. $50 becomes $500. $500 becomes $5,000. $35,000 every day. While the programmer sleeps. I analyzed the entry timings. The bot does not trade randomly. It hunts in the first 5-10 minutes after each market opens. Why? Because that is peak chaos. New candle. New contract. Fresh fear. Liquidity has not settled yet. The window of opportunity lasts seconds. For a human it is invisible noise. For code it is harvest season. Think about what this means. While 70% of Polymarket traders lose their deposits guessing direction, reading news, drawing support lines... This bot simply collects tax on their emotions. Every panic sell you make creates a pricing error. Every FOMO buy you make breaks the math. The bot is patient. The bot is precise. The bot has no nervous system. I thought winning in this market required insiders or $10k servers. This wallet proved me wrong. You do not need to know the future. You just need to know that YES + NO should equal $1. And when the crowd in panic makes the sum equal $0.95... That difference is your profit. The question is not whether these opportunities exist. The question is who takes them while you blink. Right now somewhere a new market just opened. Volatility is rising. Prices are diverging. This bot is already counting. You can keep guessing. Or you can get in line behind the one who already hacked the game. In one second he will press Buy. Twice. On both sides. And you?
0:24

A programmer found a bug in the laws of probability. Now he collects $35,000 a day for exploiting it. How do you make money betting against yourself? Sounds like idiocy. Looks like $236,000 in pure profit. 2 months ago this wallet did not exist. Today it holds $236,000 in pure profit. He does not read news. Does not watch charts. Does not listen to analysts. He just sees the moment when math breaks. And takes the difference. I found this wallet buried in the 15-minute leaderboard. First thought: another HFT bot catching milliseconds. I was wrong. The exploit is public. So is the wallet: First thing that crashed my brain. This bot does not bet on direction. It does not care if the price falls or rises. It bets on BOTH outcomes. Simultaneously. How do you make money betting against yourself? I broke down the mechanics and felt like an idiot. Here is the glitch this script exploits: On Polymarket every market has two outcomes: YES and NO. In a perfect world their sum always equals $1.00. But we do not live in a perfect world. We live in a world of panic, FOMO, and people staring at charts at 3am. When volatility spikes, the crowd goes insane. YES price flies to 60 cents. NO drops to 35. Total cost of both outcomes: 95 cents. The bot sees this instantly. It buys YES. It buys NO. Same second. Investment: 95 cents.сGuaranteed payout: $1.00. Profit: 5 cents. Does not matter where the price goes. To zero or to the moon. The bot already won before anything happened. Now multiply this by hundreds of trades per day. 5 cents becomes $50. $50 becomes $500. $500 becomes $5,000. $35,000 every day. While the programmer sleeps. I analyzed the entry timings. The bot does not trade randomly. It hunts in the first 5-10 minutes after each market opens. Why? Because that is peak chaos. New candle. New contract. Fresh fear. Liquidity has not settled yet. The window of opportunity lasts seconds. For a human it is invisible noise. For code it is harvest season. Think about what this means. While 70% of Polymarket traders lose their deposits guessing direction, reading news, drawing support lines... This bot simply collects tax on their emotions. Every panic sell you make creates a pricing error. Every FOMO buy you make breaks the math. The bot is patient. The bot is precise. The bot has no nervous system. I thought winning in this market required insiders or $10k servers. This wallet proved me wrong. You do not need to know the future. You just need to know that YES + NO should equal $1. And when the crowd in panic makes the sum equal $0.95... That difference is your profit. The question is not whether these opportunities exist. The question is who takes them while you blink. Right now somewhere a new market just opened. Volatility is rising. Prices are diverging. This bot is already counting. You can keep guessing. Or you can get in line behind the one who already hacked the game. In one second he will press Buy. Twice. On both sides. And you?

Blaze

13,898 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

A Friday afternoon autonomous car experience. Tesla fan Ghenadie Mardari, who is a qualitative physicist, wanted to try the Tesla Robotaxi service, which is really a ride-sharing service. Both drivers we had said they aren’t allowed to talk with us. Very different than my rides on Friday. Some feedback for the team before turning it on for public. The app needs far more flexibility to choose drives. Here are some requests to make the service far better, particularly when it gets to the place where humans aren’t needed to watch it. Here are several wishes: 1. Take scenic route only. It chooses the fastest route, which usually is preferred but in an autonomous car why not give us choice? 2. Find me a bathroom on my route. Especially important on longer drives (the one we are on right now is 45 minutes). 3. Visit the historical landmark up ahead. 4. Add a food stop. If the rider is headed somewhere they should be able to add a stop to pick up some food. Go through a drive through at an In-N-Out, etc. 5. Add a grocery store, or other business, stop. Similar to last one, but here the rider would need to exit the car, go into a store, pick something up, and have the car wait for them until they returned. 6. Spontaneous stop. Keys say you see an ice cream shop on your ride. You should be able to say “take me there and wait.” 7. When playing music on Apple Music I couldn’t shuffle my playlist. 8. Grok isn’t yet integrated. Should be able to have a constant conversation with Grok to do all this and much more. One thing I have learned in my four rides is that the new Model Y is nicer than any other car I have been in and is way better than our 2024 Model Y (two major things are the suspension is way better and it is noticeably quieter). Oh and on none of my rides has the human taken over, the AI driving is getting very good. Really this is a way for Elon Musk to put more Tesla employees on the road to collect more data and defray the costs of doing so. We paid about $90 to drive 1.5 hours. Both of us thought that was funny. That we took a long drive we didn’t need to take (I took him from his hotel in San Leandro to the Tesla factory in Fremont and back). Enjoyable Friday afternoon. I can’t remember ever talking to a guy who studies philosophy and physics together and learned a lot. Have a great weekend!
4:45

A Friday afternoon autonomous car experience. Tesla fan Ghenadie Mardari, who is a qualitative physicist, wanted to try the Tesla Robotaxi service, which is really a ride-sharing service. Both drivers we had said they aren’t allowed to talk with us. Very different than my rides on Friday. Some feedback for the team before turning it on for public. The app needs far more flexibility to choose drives. Here are some requests to make the service far better, particularly when it gets to the place where humans aren’t needed to watch it. Here are several wishes: 1. Take scenic route only. It chooses the fastest route, which usually is preferred but in an autonomous car why not give us choice? 2. Find me a bathroom on my route. Especially important on longer drives (the one we are on right now is 45 minutes). 3. Visit the historical landmark up ahead. 4. Add a food stop. If the rider is headed somewhere they should be able to add a stop to pick up some food. Go through a drive through at an In-N-Out, etc. 5. Add a grocery store, or other business, stop. Similar to last one, but here the rider would need to exit the car, go into a store, pick something up, and have the car wait for them until they returned. 6. Spontaneous stop. Keys say you see an ice cream shop on your ride. You should be able to say “take me there and wait.” 7. When playing music on Apple Music I couldn’t shuffle my playlist. 8. Grok isn’t yet integrated. Should be able to have a constant conversation with Grok to do all this and much more. One thing I have learned in my four rides is that the new Model Y is nicer than any other car I have been in and is way better than our 2024 Model Y (two major things are the suspension is way better and it is noticeably quieter). Oh and on none of my rides has the human taken over, the AI driving is getting very good. Really this is a way for Elon Musk to put more Tesla employees on the road to collect more data and defray the costs of doing so. We paid about $90 to drive 1.5 hours. Both of us thought that was funny. That we took a long drive we didn’t need to take (I took him from his hotel in San Leandro to the Tesla factory in Fremont and back). Enjoyable Friday afternoon. I can’t remember ever talking to a guy who studies philosophy and physics together and learned a lot. Have a great weekend!

Robert Scoble

39,834 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

CANCEL Your Weekend Plans and Learn Vibe Coding Today, Start Making $10,000/Month Building Apps for People. $0 in Coding Experience. I made 5 AI Trading Bots & Apps Built in 6 Hours. Each One Worth $3,000-$15,000 to Clients. You Spent $500 on a Bootcamp and Still Can't Deploy a Landing Page. That's not the bootcamp's fault. That's you. People with zero coding skills are building full apps with payments, databases, and authentication using AI. Charging clients $5,000-$10,000 per project. Finishing in one afternoon. You're still Googling "should I learn Python or JavaScript first." This attached video is a goldmine. 6 hours. 5 real apps. From complete beginner to deploying revenue-generating products. One video. Free. Save it. Watch it this weekend. Not next weekend. Today. Now let me break down exactly what's inside and why you can't afford to ignore this. Save this post. You'll hate yourself if you lose it. ↓ Let's talk about why you still can't code... You bought the Udemy course. $12.99. Watched 3 lectures. Got confused. Told yourself you'd continue tomorrow. That was 8 months ago. You bought another course. $49.99. This one had better reviews. Watched the intro. Bookmarked the rest. Never opened it again. You signed up for a bootcamp. $5,000. Dropped out at week 4 because "life got busy." Life didn't get busy. You got scared. Three years. Hundreds of dollars. Multiple courses. Zero apps built. Zero projects deployed. Zero revenue generated. And now someone with zero coding experience is building full apps in hours using AI tools you haven't even tried. You're not falling behind slowly. You're falling behind at full speed. Save this post right now. This is the course that makes every other coding course you bought irrelevant. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the breakdown. ↓ What is vibe coding and why should you care? Traditional coding: Learn syntax for 6 months. Build a to-do app. Feel proud. Realize nobody will pay for a to-do app. Give up. Vibe coding: Describe what you want to build. AI builds it. You guide, adjust, deploy. People pay for it. You're not writing code line by line. You're directing an AI agent that writes code for you. Think of it like this: Traditional coding = you're the construction worker. Vibe coding = you're the architect. The architect makes more money. The architect doesn't carry bricks. The architect doesn't need to know how to pour concrete. The architect needs to know what to build and why. That's vibe coding. And while you've been debating whether to learn Python or JavaScript first, people are skipping both and building apps that generate revenue. With zero coding knowledge. This isn't the future. This is right now. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for more vibe coding breakdowns that actually make you money. ↓ What this 6-hour course covers. This isn't some 20-minute tutorial that shows you how to make a button change color. This is 6 hours. 5 complete apps. Real software engineering. Real deployment. Real money-making potential. Here's what you'll build: > Portfolio website - deployed live on Netlify > Full-stack client dashboard - with database and auth > Lead generation app - with API integrations > Thumbnail generator - with payment integration via Stripe > Splinter - a full SaaS product with pricing and marketing Not toy projects. Not "follow along and never use again." Actual apps that people pay for. Built with Gemini 3.1 Pro, Antigravity, Supabase, Next.js, Vite, and more. You know how many people charge $5,000+ to build a single one of these apps for a client? You'll be able to build all 5 by the end of this weekend. You can't afford to scroll past this. Bookmark this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm breaking down every tool in this stack separately. ↓ The tools you'll master. Gemini 3.1 Pro: Google's most powerful AI model. You'll use it to generate entire codebases. Not snippets. Entire apps. Antigravity: The AI coding environment that makes vibe coding actually work. Agent chat. MCP servers. Voice dictation. It's not VS Code with a chatbot bolted on. It's built from the ground up for AI-first development. Supabase: Your backend. Database. Authentication. All set up in minutes. Not weeks of configuration. Next.js + Vite: Modern frameworks that make your apps fast, scalable, and professional. Stripe: Payment integration. So your apps can actually charge people money. You know, the whole point. Claude Code: Yes, Claude Code is covered too. Because the best developers in 2026 don't use one AI tool. They use all of them. While you're still trying to decide which AI tool is "the best one," smart people are using all of them together and making money from every angle. Stop debating tools. Start using them. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for deep dives into each of these tools. ↓ What you'll actually learn beyond just "building apps." This course doesn't just teach you to copy and paste prompts. You'll learn real software engineering: > Hosting and deployment > Modern software design patterns > Languages and frameworks > Version control and GitHub > Programming with AI agents and agent teams > Database design (SQL vs NoSQL) > Security audits > API integration > Payment processing This is everything a $15,000 bootcamp teaches. In 6 hours. For free. On YouTube. Your friend who spent $15K on a bootcamp is going to be really upset when you build better apps than them after watching one YouTube video this weekend. Don't tell them about this course. Or do. Their reaction will be priceless. This is a $15,000 education for $0. Save this post before it gets buried. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more free resources that make paid courses look like scams. ↓ The guy teaching this actually makes money. Not "makes money selling courses about making money." Actually makes money. Nick built automated businesses with Make . Most notably 1SecondCopy, a content company that hit 7 figures. Seven figures. From automation. He's not teaching theory. He's showing you what real systems that generate real revenue look like. 90% of coding teachers on YouTube have never shipped a product that made $1. They teach coding. They don't use coding to make money. This guy does both. That's why this course is different. You've been learning from people who teach for a living. Start learning from people who build for a living. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more content from builders, not lecturers. ↓ Let me tell you what's really happening while you "think about learning to code." Every week that passes, AI coding tools get better. Every week that passes, more people learn vibe coding. Every week that passes, the market gets more competitive. Right now, vibe coding is still early. Not many people know how to do it well. Clients are desperate for someone who can build apps fast. $3,000 for a landing page with payments. $5,000 for a SaaS MVP. $10,000 for a full client dashboard. These are real prices people are charging for apps they built in a single day using the exact tools in this course. But this window won't last forever. In 6 months, everyone will know how to vibe code. In 12 months, it'll be a basic requirement. In 24 months, not knowing this will be like not knowing how to use email in 2010. You're either early or you're irrelevant. Right now you can still be early. But not if you spend this weekend on Netflix. The window is closing. Every weekend you waste is a weekend someone else uses to get ahead of you. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar before this opportunity becomes obvious to everyone. ↓ The 5 apps you'll build and what they're actually worth. App 1: Portfolio Website. What clients pay for this: $500-$2,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 30 minutes. App 2: Client Dashboard. What clients pay for this: $5,000-$15,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 2-3 hours. App 3: Lead Generation Tool. What clients pay for this: $3,000-$8,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 1-2 hours. App 4: Thumbnail Generator with Payments. What clients pay for this: $2,000-$5,000. Or sell it as a SaaS for recurring revenue. Time to build: 1-2 hours. App 5: Splinter (Full SaaS Product). What clients pay for this: $10,000-$25,000. Or launch it yourself for monthly recurring revenue. Time to build: 2-3 hours. Total value of apps you can build after this course: $20,000-$55,000. Total cost of this course: $0. Total time investment: one weekend. You spend more than one weekend deciding which Netflix show to start next. At least this weekend would pay you back. Read those numbers again. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll be breaking down how to sell each of these apps as a service. ↓ Here's the business model nobody's talking about. Learn vibe coding this weekend. Build 5 apps. Pick the one you're best at. Offer it as a service. "I build professional SaaS dashboards for businesses using AI. Faster than agencies. Fraction of the cost. $5,000 per project." 2 projects per month = $10,000/month. Working maybe 20 hours total. While you're applying for jobs that pay $4,000/month and require 5 years of experience you don't have, someone who watched this course last weekend just landed their second $5,000 client. No degree. No portfolio. No 5 years of experience. Just the ability to build what people need faster than anyone else. That's the entire business model. Learn fast. Build fast. Charge accordingly. Stop applying for jobs. Start creating them. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the exact outreach scripts to land your first vibe coding client. ↓ Why you won't watch this course. Because it's 6 hours. "6 hours?? That's too long." You binged an entire season of a show last weekend in 8 hours. You scrolled Twitter for 4 hours yesterday. You spent 3 hours watching YouTube shorts that you don't even remember. But 6 hours to learn a skill that could make you $10,000/month? "I don't have time for that." You have time. You just don't have discipline. And that's the actual reason you're broke. Not the economy. Not the market. Not your circumstances. Your inability to sit down for 6 hours and learn something that changes your life. Everything else is a story you tell yourself to feel better about doing nothing. That's the uncomfortable truth. Save this post so it stares at you every time you open your bookmarks. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll keep reminding you until you actually do something. ↓ What happens this weekend determines your next year. Path A: Watch the course Saturday. Build your first app Sunday. Start offering services Monday. Land first client within 2 weeks. $5,000-$10,000/month within 60 days. Path B: Sleep in Saturday. Brunch Sunday. Netflix Sunday night. Monday morning alarm goes off. Back to the same job. Same salary. Same frustration. Same "I'll start next weekend." 52 weekends in a year. How many have you already wasted? Path A costs you one weekend. Path B costs you your entire future. Same video. Same information. Same 6 hours. Two completely different lives. ↓ Full 6-hour course attached. 5 real apps. Real deployment. Real revenue potential. From the guy who built a 7-figure automated business. Not theory. Not motivation. Actual hands-on building. The course is free. The tools are free. The knowledge is right here. The only thing that costs money is your decision to do nothing. And that cost compounds every single day. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free YouTube videos into $10,000/month skill sets. Save this post. Watch the video. Build something this weekend that your Monday self will thank you for. Or don't. And wonder next year why nothing changed.
5:54:41

CANCEL Your Weekend Plans and Learn Vibe Coding Today, Start Making $10,000/Month Building Apps for People. $0 in Coding Experience. I made 5 AI Trading Bots & Apps Built in 6 Hours. Each One Worth $3,000-$15,000 to Clients. You Spent $500 on a Bootcamp and Still Can't Deploy a Landing Page. That's not the bootcamp's fault. That's you. People with zero coding skills are building full apps with payments, databases, and authentication using AI. Charging clients $5,000-$10,000 per project. Finishing in one afternoon. You're still Googling "should I learn Python or JavaScript first." This attached video is a goldmine. 6 hours. 5 real apps. From complete beginner to deploying revenue-generating products. One video. Free. Save it. Watch it this weekend. Not next weekend. Today. Now let me break down exactly what's inside and why you can't afford to ignore this. Save this post. You'll hate yourself if you lose it. ↓ Let's talk about why you still can't code... You bought the Udemy course. $12.99. Watched 3 lectures. Got confused. Told yourself you'd continue tomorrow. That was 8 months ago. You bought another course. $49.99. This one had better reviews. Watched the intro. Bookmarked the rest. Never opened it again. You signed up for a bootcamp. $5,000. Dropped out at week 4 because "life got busy." Life didn't get busy. You got scared. Three years. Hundreds of dollars. Multiple courses. Zero apps built. Zero projects deployed. Zero revenue generated. And now someone with zero coding experience is building full apps in hours using AI tools you haven't even tried. You're not falling behind slowly. You're falling behind at full speed. Save this post right now. This is the course that makes every other coding course you bought irrelevant. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the breakdown. ↓ What is vibe coding and why should you care? Traditional coding: Learn syntax for 6 months. Build a to-do app. Feel proud. Realize nobody will pay for a to-do app. Give up. Vibe coding: Describe what you want to build. AI builds it. You guide, adjust, deploy. People pay for it. You're not writing code line by line. You're directing an AI agent that writes code for you. Think of it like this: Traditional coding = you're the construction worker. Vibe coding = you're the architect. The architect makes more money. The architect doesn't carry bricks. The architect doesn't need to know how to pour concrete. The architect needs to know what to build and why. That's vibe coding. And while you've been debating whether to learn Python or JavaScript first, people are skipping both and building apps that generate revenue. With zero coding knowledge. This isn't the future. This is right now. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for more vibe coding breakdowns that actually make you money. ↓ What this 6-hour course covers. This isn't some 20-minute tutorial that shows you how to make a button change color. This is 6 hours. 5 complete apps. Real software engineering. Real deployment. Real money-making potential. Here's what you'll build: > Portfolio website - deployed live on Netlify > Full-stack client dashboard - with database and auth > Lead generation app - with API integrations > Thumbnail generator - with payment integration via Stripe > Splinter - a full SaaS product with pricing and marketing Not toy projects. Not "follow along and never use again." Actual apps that people pay for. Built with Gemini 3.1 Pro, Antigravity, Supabase, Next.js, Vite, and more. You know how many people charge $5,000+ to build a single one of these apps for a client? You'll be able to build all 5 by the end of this weekend. You can't afford to scroll past this. Bookmark this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm breaking down every tool in this stack separately. ↓ The tools you'll master. Gemini 3.1 Pro: Google's most powerful AI model. You'll use it to generate entire codebases. Not snippets. Entire apps. Antigravity: The AI coding environment that makes vibe coding actually work. Agent chat. MCP servers. Voice dictation. It's not VS Code with a chatbot bolted on. It's built from the ground up for AI-first development. Supabase: Your backend. Database. Authentication. All set up in minutes. Not weeks of configuration. Next.js + Vite: Modern frameworks that make your apps fast, scalable, and professional. Stripe: Payment integration. So your apps can actually charge people money. You know, the whole point. Claude Code: Yes, Claude Code is covered too. Because the best developers in 2026 don't use one AI tool. They use all of them. While you're still trying to decide which AI tool is "the best one," smart people are using all of them together and making money from every angle. Stop debating tools. Start using them. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for deep dives into each of these tools. ↓ What you'll actually learn beyond just "building apps." This course doesn't just teach you to copy and paste prompts. You'll learn real software engineering: > Hosting and deployment > Modern software design patterns > Languages and frameworks > Version control and GitHub > Programming with AI agents and agent teams > Database design (SQL vs NoSQL) > Security audits > API integration > Payment processing This is everything a $15,000 bootcamp teaches. In 6 hours. For free. On YouTube. Your friend who spent $15K on a bootcamp is going to be really upset when you build better apps than them after watching one YouTube video this weekend. Don't tell them about this course. Or do. Their reaction will be priceless. This is a $15,000 education for $0. Save this post before it gets buried. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more free resources that make paid courses look like scams. ↓ The guy teaching this actually makes money. Not "makes money selling courses about making money." Actually makes money. Nick built automated businesses with Make . Most notably 1SecondCopy, a content company that hit 7 figures. Seven figures. From automation. He's not teaching theory. He's showing you what real systems that generate real revenue look like. 90% of coding teachers on YouTube have never shipped a product that made $1. They teach coding. They don't use coding to make money. This guy does both. That's why this course is different. You've been learning from people who teach for a living. Start learning from people who build for a living. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more content from builders, not lecturers. ↓ Let me tell you what's really happening while you "think about learning to code." Every week that passes, AI coding tools get better. Every week that passes, more people learn vibe coding. Every week that passes, the market gets more competitive. Right now, vibe coding is still early. Not many people know how to do it well. Clients are desperate for someone who can build apps fast. $3,000 for a landing page with payments. $5,000 for a SaaS MVP. $10,000 for a full client dashboard. These are real prices people are charging for apps they built in a single day using the exact tools in this course. But this window won't last forever. In 6 months, everyone will know how to vibe code. In 12 months, it'll be a basic requirement. In 24 months, not knowing this will be like not knowing how to use email in 2010. You're either early or you're irrelevant. Right now you can still be early. But not if you spend this weekend on Netflix. The window is closing. Every weekend you waste is a weekend someone else uses to get ahead of you. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar before this opportunity becomes obvious to everyone. ↓ The 5 apps you'll build and what they're actually worth. App 1: Portfolio Website. What clients pay for this: $500-$2,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 30 minutes. App 2: Client Dashboard. What clients pay for this: $5,000-$15,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 2-3 hours. App 3: Lead Generation Tool. What clients pay for this: $3,000-$8,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 1-2 hours. App 4: Thumbnail Generator with Payments. What clients pay for this: $2,000-$5,000. Or sell it as a SaaS for recurring revenue. Time to build: 1-2 hours. App 5: Splinter (Full SaaS Product). What clients pay for this: $10,000-$25,000. Or launch it yourself for monthly recurring revenue. Time to build: 2-3 hours. Total value of apps you can build after this course: $20,000-$55,000. Total cost of this course: $0. Total time investment: one weekend. You spend more than one weekend deciding which Netflix show to start next. At least this weekend would pay you back. Read those numbers again. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll be breaking down how to sell each of these apps as a service. ↓ Here's the business model nobody's talking about. Learn vibe coding this weekend. Build 5 apps. Pick the one you're best at. Offer it as a service. "I build professional SaaS dashboards for businesses using AI. Faster than agencies. Fraction of the cost. $5,000 per project." 2 projects per month = $10,000/month. Working maybe 20 hours total. While you're applying for jobs that pay $4,000/month and require 5 years of experience you don't have, someone who watched this course last weekend just landed their second $5,000 client. No degree. No portfolio. No 5 years of experience. Just the ability to build what people need faster than anyone else. That's the entire business model. Learn fast. Build fast. Charge accordingly. Stop applying for jobs. Start creating them. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the exact outreach scripts to land your first vibe coding client. ↓ Why you won't watch this course. Because it's 6 hours. "6 hours?? That's too long." You binged an entire season of a show last weekend in 8 hours. You scrolled Twitter for 4 hours yesterday. You spent 3 hours watching YouTube shorts that you don't even remember. But 6 hours to learn a skill that could make you $10,000/month? "I don't have time for that." You have time. You just don't have discipline. And that's the actual reason you're broke. Not the economy. Not the market. Not your circumstances. Your inability to sit down for 6 hours and learn something that changes your life. Everything else is a story you tell yourself to feel better about doing nothing. That's the uncomfortable truth. Save this post so it stares at you every time you open your bookmarks. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll keep reminding you until you actually do something. ↓ What happens this weekend determines your next year. Path A: Watch the course Saturday. Build your first app Sunday. Start offering services Monday. Land first client within 2 weeks. $5,000-$10,000/month within 60 days. Path B: Sleep in Saturday. Brunch Sunday. Netflix Sunday night. Monday morning alarm goes off. Back to the same job. Same salary. Same frustration. Same "I'll start next weekend." 52 weekends in a year. How many have you already wasted? Path A costs you one weekend. Path B costs you your entire future. Same video. Same information. Same 6 hours. Two completely different lives. ↓ Full 6-hour course attached. 5 real apps. Real deployment. Real revenue potential. From the guy who built a 7-figure automated business. Not theory. Not motivation. Actual hands-on building. The course is free. The tools are free. The knowledge is right here. The only thing that costs money is your decision to do nothing. And that cost compounds every single day. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free YouTube videos into $10,000/month skill sets. Save this post. Watch the video. Build something this weekend that your Monday self will thank you for. Or don't. And wonder next year why nothing changed.

Himanshu Kumar

39,379 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

It actually makes sense to remove Lilepo when you need a goal, especially when you contextualise his output properly. Here is my argument📝 ■ You don't need a goal from Lilepo. You need a goal from the team, and Lilepo is focusing on himself more than the team. He has 2 league goals and 1 assist in 14 games, with 4 goals in the CAFCC. But the deeper issue is efficiency: ■ In the league, his 2 goals came from 56 shots. That’s 1 goal every 28 shots❌️ ■ A scoring frequency of 520 minutes per goal❌️ For a regular starter in an attack that already struggles with conversion, that’s a serious problem. Something our coaches are paying less attention to hence they keep arguing with journalists instead of fixing this problem with proper selection and tactics. Using Lilepo as an inverted winger from the right with obvious instructions to shoot on sight💔 Now compare that to Silva, who scores every 92 minutes and is leading in this area in the entire league. A player who deserves the minutes we are giving to Lilepo. Yes, everyone misses chances, but efficiency matters. The difference between 92 minutes and 520 minutes is not small. It’s massive. The issue isn’t just missed chances. It’s decision-making. Lilepo shoots from low percentage areas, often ignoring teammates in better positions. I don't know how many times I've touched on this in previous games. Some misses are understandable, but others are just unnecessary. That’s what makes it costly. High shot volume with low conversion kills attacking rhythm. It kills the spirit of other players. Ends up giving the opposition confidence to claw their way back into games we should comfortably win. And here’s the bigger point. Players with better scoring frequency don’t get the same consistent minutes as Lilepo. They get judged with misses from 1 game. So, the attack remains blunt because inefficiency is being rewarded with game time. If a player averages a goal every 520 minutes, takes 28 shots per goal, and continues to start while more efficient players sit, then yes, benching him becomes a logical football decision. If Lilepo chose teammates in good positions with at least 50% of the 56 shots he wasted, the team would have had better odds in getting goals like we saw with his 2nd cross yesterday assisting our only goal. Because right now, his overall contribution suggests he’s not making the attack better. And when you need a goal, you prioritise efficiency, not just volume.
2:07

It actually makes sense to remove Lilepo when you need a goal, especially when you contextualise his output properly. Here is my argument📝 ■ You don't need a goal from Lilepo. You need a goal from the team, and Lilepo is focusing on himself more than the team. He has 2 league goals and 1 assist in 14 games, with 4 goals in the CAFCC. But the deeper issue is efficiency: ■ In the league, his 2 goals came from 56 shots. That’s 1 goal every 28 shots❌️ ■ A scoring frequency of 520 minutes per goal❌️ For a regular starter in an attack that already struggles with conversion, that’s a serious problem. Something our coaches are paying less attention to hence they keep arguing with journalists instead of fixing this problem with proper selection and tactics. Using Lilepo as an inverted winger from the right with obvious instructions to shoot on sight💔 Now compare that to Silva, who scores every 92 minutes and is leading in this area in the entire league. A player who deserves the minutes we are giving to Lilepo. Yes, everyone misses chances, but efficiency matters. The difference between 92 minutes and 520 minutes is not small. It’s massive. The issue isn’t just missed chances. It’s decision-making. Lilepo shoots from low percentage areas, often ignoring teammates in better positions. I don't know how many times I've touched on this in previous games. Some misses are understandable, but others are just unnecessary. That’s what makes it costly. High shot volume with low conversion kills attacking rhythm. It kills the spirit of other players. Ends up giving the opposition confidence to claw their way back into games we should comfortably win. And here’s the bigger point. Players with better scoring frequency don’t get the same consistent minutes as Lilepo. They get judged with misses from 1 game. So, the attack remains blunt because inefficiency is being rewarded with game time. If a player averages a goal every 520 minutes, takes 28 shots per goal, and continues to start while more efficient players sit, then yes, benching him becomes a logical football decision. If Lilepo chose teammates in good positions with at least 50% of the 56 shots he wasted, the team would have had better odds in getting goals like we saw with his 2nd cross yesterday assisting our only goal. Because right now, his overall contribution suggests he’s not making the attack better. And when you need a goal, you prioritise efficiency, not just volume.

El Capitano⚪

26,092 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten