Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Gorsuch: So congress as a practical matter, can't get this power back once it's handed it over to the president.. one way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people's elected representatives.

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

733,760 subscribers

330,715 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

CNN montage from SCOTUS today. Roberts: The vehicle is imposition of taxes on Americans, and that has always been the core power of Congress. Gorsuch: Congress, as a practical matter, can't get this power back once it's handed it over to the president. It's a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch.
0:37

CNN montage from SCOTUS today. Roberts: The vehicle is imposition of taxes on Americans, and that has always been the core power of Congress. Gorsuch: Congress, as a practical matter, can't get this power back once it's handed it over to the president. It's a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch.

Blue Georgia

588,809 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: In a worrying development, the U.S. Supreme Court appears VERY skeptical of President Trump's emergency tariff powers, setting the stage for striking them down. GORSUCH: "Congress as a practical matter can’t get this power back once it’s handed it over. The president is a one way rachet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people’s elected representatives." Gorsuch also suggested Trump's tariffs could be a slippery slope for a president to "ignore" Congress on other things. KAVANAUGH (paraphrase): Why has no president before invoked tariffs under the IEEPA? BARRETT: Reciprocal tariffs didn't make sense for some countries. “And so is it your contention that every country needed to be tariffed because of threats to the defense and industrial base? I mean, Spain? France? I mean, I could see it with some countries but explain to me why, as many countries, needed to be subject to the reciprocal tariff policy, as are.” Unbelievable.
2:16

🚨 BREAKING: In a worrying development, the U.S. Supreme Court appears VERY skeptical of President Trump's emergency tariff powers, setting the stage for striking them down. GORSUCH: "Congress as a practical matter can’t get this power back once it’s handed it over. The president is a one way rachet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people’s elected representatives." Gorsuch also suggested Trump's tariffs could be a slippery slope for a president to "ignore" Congress on other things. KAVANAUGH (paraphrase): Why has no president before invoked tariffs under the IEEPA? BARRETT: Reciprocal tariffs didn't make sense for some countries. “And so is it your contention that every country needed to be tariffed because of threats to the defense and industrial base? I mean, Spain? France? I mean, I could see it with some countries but explain to me why, as many countries, needed to be subject to the reciprocal tariff policy, as are.” Unbelievable.

Eric Daugherty

1,688,134 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

ABOLISH ICE. Replace it with an agency controlled solely by Congress, not the Executive Branch. It’s time to strip power away from the Executive Branch and put it in the hands of THE PEOPLE.
1:13

ABOLISH ICE. Replace it with an agency controlled solely by Congress, not the Executive Branch. It’s time to strip power away from the Executive Branch and put it in the hands of THE PEOPLE.

Kyle Sweetser

13,506 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The "power of the purse" is granted solely to Congress in the Constitution. However, we're handing over our own power as we continue to allow the Executive Branch to substitute its agenda for Congress' role. It's dangerous and sets a harmful precedent for our nation's future.
1:21

The "power of the purse" is granted solely to Congress in the Constitution. However, we're handing over our own power as we continue to allow the Executive Branch to substitute its agenda for Congress' role. It's dangerous and sets a harmful precedent for our nation's future.

Senator Angus King

27,070 просмотров • 1 год назад

Gorsuch: What's the reason to accept the notion that congress can hand off the power to declare war to the president? Sauer: Well, we don't contend that Gorsuch: You do, you say it's unreviewable…
0:28

Gorsuch: What's the reason to accept the notion that congress can hand off the power to declare war to the president? Sauer: Well, we don't contend that Gorsuch: You do, you say it's unreviewable…

Acyn

645,826 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”
1:03

Mr. Samuel Adkisson, Associate Counsel to the President, White House Counsel's Office, on presidential accountability over the executive branch: “To the extent federal agencies exercise significant executive power, that agency must be accountable to the president. Article II of the Constitution vests the executive power in a president of the United States of America, period. The Constitution also provides that the president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. But if the president can't effectively supervise his subordinates in the executive branch — if, in other words, he is not in charge — it becomes practically impossible for the president to fulfill his duties under Article II of the Constitution. It also begs the question: who would be in charge? It's not the courts. It's not Congress. It's certainly not the people.”

Federalist Society

24,723 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Raskin: I heard one of our colleagues across the aisle just say, “Well, yes, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 does give Congress the exclusive, plenary, comprehensive power to declare war and not the president. And we could be debating it, but the president has already taken us to war, so it’s too late. It would undermine the cause for us to debate it.” What a humiliating, self-defeating argument for a member of the Article I branch of Congress to be making. Don’t you understand? That destroys our power to declare war if any president can plunge us into a war and thereby defeat our exclusive, plenary power over it—
2:16

Raskin: I heard one of our colleagues across the aisle just say, “Well, yes, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 does give Congress the exclusive, plenary, comprehensive power to declare war and not the president. And we could be debating it, but the president has already taken us to war, so it’s too late. It would undermine the cause for us to debate it.” What a humiliating, self-defeating argument for a member of the Article I branch of Congress to be making. Don’t you understand? That destroys our power to declare war if any president can plunge us into a war and thereby defeat our exclusive, plenary power over it—

Acyn

406,066 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

SCOTUS justices signaled they're skeptical of Trump’s use of executive power to impose the tariffs. Gorsuch asked: “What would prohibit Congress from just abdicating all responsibility to regulate foreign commerce — for that matter, declare war — to the president?” Hear more👇
3:30

SCOTUS justices signaled they're skeptical of Trump’s use of executive power to impose the tariffs. Gorsuch asked: “What would prohibit Congress from just abdicating all responsibility to regulate foreign commerce — for that matter, declare war — to the president?” Hear more👇

POLITICO

19,074 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Raskin: The president derives his powers only either from the Constitution explicitly or from an act of Congress and Congress certainly has never given the president the power to relocate prisoners to foreign countries and there's nothing in the constitution that remotely vests that power…
1:05

Raskin: The president derives his powers only either from the Constitution explicitly or from an act of Congress and Congress certainly has never given the president the power to relocate prisoners to foreign countries and there's nothing in the constitution that remotely vests that power…

Acyn

117,749 просмотров • 1 год назад

I support President Donald J. Trump on many fronts. But let's be clear: tariffs are taxes. And the power to tax lies with Congress-- not the executive branch. The Constitution laid out the process. It's time we followed it.
2:01

I support President Donald J. Trump on many fronts. But let's be clear: tariffs are taxes. And the power to tax lies with Congress-- not the executive branch. The Constitution laid out the process. It's time we followed it.

Senator Rand Paul

145,750 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Congress is complicit in handing over their power to the executive branch," said Leigh Ann Caldwell. "[Project 2025] wrote a line about Congress that, given the choice between being powerful but vulnerable or irrelevant but famous, most members of Congress have chosen the latter."
1:44

"Congress is complicit in handing over their power to the executive branch," said Leigh Ann Caldwell. "[Project 2025] wrote a line about Congress that, given the choice between being powerful but vulnerable or irrelevant but famous, most members of Congress have chosen the latter."

Washington Week with The Atlantic | PBS

29,748 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Under our Constitution, the power to declare war belongs with the elected representatives of the people in Congress—not with any one man, no matter how wise or foolish, no matter how far-seeing or desperate he may be.
0:30

Under our Constitution, the power to declare war belongs with the elected representatives of the people in Congress—not with any one man, no matter how wise or foolish, no matter how far-seeing or desperate he may be.

Jamie Raskin

73,557 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад