Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Got an output from the strongest pre-release Gemini 3.5 Pro checkpoint 👀 I compared it to Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 on the same exact prompt Yeah... This model is mostly dead on arrival (tried it on other prompts too ofc). It will likely be the "poor man's model"...

Lentils80's profile picture

Lentils

3,304 subscribers

50,395 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaEğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Every 5 minutes, Sakana Fugu's conductor splits trades between GPT-5.5, Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.5, and it beats every model it directs.
0:42

Every 5 minutes, Sakana Fugu's conductor splits trades between GPT-5.5, Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.5, and it beats every model it directs.

0xMarioNawfal

57,656 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

I gave 4 frontier models the same prompt to create an Ecco the Dolphin style video game 100% procedural 🐬 Same task, official chat UIs, max thinking. Watch 👇 Claude Fable 5 Z.ai GLM 5.2 ChatGPT GPT 5.5 Pro Google Gemini Flash 3.5 Note: Fable 5 version was created before the model was restricted.
0:53

I gave 4 frontier models the same prompt to create an Ecco the Dolphin style video game 100% procedural 🐬 Same task, official chat UIs, max thinking. Watch 👇 Claude Fable 5 Z.ai GLM 5.2 ChatGPT GPT 5.5 Pro Google Gemini Flash 3.5 Note: Fable 5 version was created before the model was restricted.

Majid Manzarpour

42,774 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
0:34

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

Lentils

207,097 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.
0:30

Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.

GMI Cloud

319,114 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

228,126 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

$GOOGL launched Gemini 3.5 Flash which it says beats Gemini 3.1 Pro across coding, real-world agentic tasks & scaled tool use. Artificial Analysis shows it running at 289 output tokens/sec which is more than 4x faster than Claude Opus 4.7 & GPT-5.5.
1:32

$GOOGL launched Gemini 3.5 Flash which it says beats Gemini 3.1 Pro across coding, real-world agentic tasks & scaled tool use. Artificial Analysis shows it running at 289 output tokens/sec which is more than 4x faster than Claude Opus 4.7 & GPT-5.5.

Shay Boloor

56,188 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Are AI agents shape rotators? In this new benchmark, we let the models play campaign puzzles in Opus Magnum, a puzzle game by Zachtronics. Ironically, Claude Opus 4.8 performed poorly, being beaten by GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and GLM 5.2. Claude Fable 5 crushed them all.
1:28

Are AI agents shape rotators? In this new benchmark, we let the models play campaign puzzles in Opus Magnum, a puzzle game by Zachtronics. Ironically, Claude Opus 4.8 performed poorly, being beaten by GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and GLM 5.2. Claude Fable 5 crushed them all.

Rob Haisfield

495,984 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

Gemini 3.2 got renamed to 3.5 👀 In other news, below are outputs from a strong Gemini 3.5 Pro checkpoint called "Cappuccino"
1:05

Gemini 3.2 got renamed to 3.5 👀 In other news, below are outputs from a strong Gemini 3.5 Pro checkpoint called "Cappuccino"

Lentils

97,820 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude 3.5 Sonnet transformed a research paper into an interactive learning dashboard in just 30 seconds. It goes beyond the capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, Llama and other existing LLMs. Education will never be the same again with AI.
0:22

Claude 3.5 Sonnet transformed a research paper into an interactive learning dashboard in just 30 seconds. It goes beyond the capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, Llama and other existing LLMs. Education will never be the same again with AI.

Shubham Saboo

679,011 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10
0:39

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10

Command Code

854,412 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now
0:23

Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now

GMI Cloud

116,249 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A new Gemini model was A/B tested over the weekend on Google AI Studio it outperforms lithiumflow in music! Gemini 3 Pro GA or Gemini 3.5 Pro? 👀
1:48

A new Gemini model was A/B tested over the weekend on Google AI Studio it outperforms lithiumflow in music! Gemini 3 Pro GA or Gemini 3.5 Pro? 👀

Legit

16,693 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

New results just dropped 🥳! We have integrated GPT-4.5 and Gemini-2.0-flash in our gaming agents and test them on Super Mario Bros. ⚔️ GPT-4.5 struggles due to high latency, Gemini-2.0-flash performs significantly better than Gemini-1.5-pro, on par with Claude-3.5. Enjoy! 🎮
1:15

New results just dropped 🥳! We have integrated GPT-4.5 and Gemini-2.0-flash in our gaming agents and test them on Super Mario Bros. ⚔️ GPT-4.5 struggles due to high latency, Gemini-2.0-flash performs significantly better than Gemini-1.5-pro, on par with Claude-3.5. Enjoy! 🎮

Hao AI Lab

15,521 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Running a real-time experiment on Julius: Which model can find mag 7 financial data and create a dashboard from it faster and more effectively - Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5? Which do you think is Model A and which is Model B?
1:14

Running a real-time experiment on Julius: Which model can find mag 7 financial data and create a dashboard from it faster and more effectively - Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5? Which do you think is Model A and which is Model B?

Julius AI

159,113 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude Fable 5 on left vs GPT 5.5 on right. Both one shot. Fable 5 is truly a big jump in CAD capabilities as seen in ForgeCAD.
0:20

Claude Fable 5 on left vs GPT 5.5 on right. Both one shot. Fable 5 is truly a big jump in CAD capabilities as seen in ForgeCAD.

Ruben Kostandyan

31,670 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

FREE Claude Opus 4.8. FREE GPT 5.5. All free. 7,200 credits. I tested it myself - works. The platform is Gumloop(.)com. Chat interface plus connections into different services. Company raised $50M Here's the exact setup: → Register via Google OAuth or Microsoft OAuth → During onboarding, answer the questions and select every option you can → When asked to connect services, pick Apify, Semrush, and Reducto - no login needed for any of them → Skip the Slack connection → Done correctly, you land 7,200 credits minimum Models inside: Opus 4.6 through 4.8, GPT 5.3 Codex, GPT 5.4, GPT 5.5, Gemini 3 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro, Kimi K2.6. No card needed anywhere in this flow. I ran through it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before it gets patched.
0:33

FREE Claude Opus 4.8. FREE GPT 5.5. All free. 7,200 credits. I tested it myself - works. The platform is Gumloop(.)com. Chat interface plus connections into different services. Company raised $50M Here's the exact setup: → Register via Google OAuth or Microsoft OAuth → During onboarding, answer the questions and select every option you can → When asked to connect services, pick Apify, Semrush, and Reducto - no login needed for any of them → Skip the Slack connection → Done correctly, you land 7,200 credits minimum Models inside: Opus 4.6 through 4.8, GPT 5.3 Codex, GPT 5.4, GPT 5.5, Gemini 3 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro, Kimi K2.6. No card needed anywhere in this flow. I ran through it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before it gets patched.

Atenov int.

22,779 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Claude Fable 5 created this horror game with the same prompt we tested Fusion on. Do not fall for OpenRouters fraudulent marketing scheme. The capability of Fusion is NO WHERE close to that of Fable 5. Stringing together Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and DeepSeek V4 does not give you a better model. OpenRouter should be sued for false marketing.
1:17

Claude Fable 5 created this horror game with the same prompt we tested Fusion on. Do not fall for OpenRouters fraudulent marketing scheme. The capability of Fusion is NO WHERE close to that of Fable 5. Stringing together Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and DeepSeek V4 does not give you a better model. OpenRouter should be sued for false marketing.

BridgeMind

30,972 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Flash checkpoint notes: The old “cool Gemini UI” vibe feels mostly gone. It is more GPTified now. Good: fast, smart for a Flash model. Bad: it keeps filling websites with HUDs/panels, even when the prompt asks for restraint. Biggest issue: prompt adherence. I told it multiple times not to use web, and it still did. Because of that, exact knowledge cutoff is hard to verify confidently.
0:48

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Flash checkpoint notes: The old “cool Gemini UI” vibe feels mostly gone. It is more GPTified now. Good: fast, smart for a Flash model. Bad: it keeps filling websites with HUDs/panels, even when the prompt asks for restraint. Biggest issue: prompt adherence. I told it multiple times not to use web, and it still did. Because of that, exact knowledge cutoff is hard to verify confidently.

Chetaslua

127,743 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.
0:29

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

181,100 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Claude Sonnet 3.5 Artifacts is now available to use with GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama-3 and other LLMs for just $10 a month. Build interactive experiences, search the web, generate images and audio with GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 in just one AI playground.
0:38

Claude Sonnet 3.5 Artifacts is now available to use with GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama-3 and other LLMs for just $10 a month. Build interactive experiences, search the web, generate images and audio with GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 in just one AI playground.

Shubham Saboo

27,452 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce