正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Got an output from the strongest pre-release Gemini 3.5 Pro checkpoint 👀 I compared it to Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 on the same exact prompt Yeah... This model is mostly dead on arrival (tried it on other prompts too ofc). It will likely be the "poor man's model"... show more

Lentils

3,304 subscribers

50,395 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Every 5 minutes, Sakana Fugu's conductor splits trades between GPT-5.5, Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.5, and it beats every model it directs.

Every 5 minutes, Sakana Fugu's conductor splits trades between GPT-5.5, Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.5, and it beats every model it directs.

0xMarioNawfal

57,656 次观看 • 3 个月前

I gave 4 frontier models the same prompt to create an Ecco the Dolphin style video game 100% procedural 🐬 Same task, official chat UIs, max thinking. Watch 👇 Claude Fable 5 Z.ai GLM 5.2 ChatGPT GPT 5.5 Pro Google Gemini Flash 3.5 Note: Fable 5 version was created before the model was restricted.

I gave 4 frontier models the same prompt to create an Ecco the Dolphin style video game 100% procedural 🐬 Same task, official chat UIs, max thinking. Watch 👇 Claude Fable 5 Z.ai GLM 5.2 ChatGPT GPT 5.5 Pro Google Gemini Flash 3.5 Note: Fable 5 version was created before the model was restricted.

Majid Manzarpour

42,774 次观看 • 3 个月前

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

Lentils

207,512 次观看 • 4 个月前

Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.

Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.

GMI Cloud

320,607 次观看 • 4 个月前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 次观看 • 3 个月前

Are AI agents shape rotators? In this new benchmark, we let the models play campaign puzzles in Opus Magnum, a puzzle game by Zachtronics. Ironically, Claude Opus 4.8 performed poorly, being beaten by GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and GLM 5.2. Claude Fable 5 crushed them all.

Are AI agents shape rotators? In this new benchmark, we let the models play campaign puzzles in Opus Magnum, a puzzle game by Zachtronics. Ironically, Claude Opus 4.8 performed poorly, being beaten by GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and GLM 5.2. Claude Fable 5 crushed them all.

Rob Haisfield

501,638 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude 3.5 Sonnet transformed a research paper into an interactive learning dashboard in just 30 seconds. It goes beyond the capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, Llama and other existing LLMs. Education will never be the same again with AI.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet transformed a research paper into an interactive learning dashboard in just 30 seconds. It goes beyond the capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, Llama and other existing LLMs. Education will never be the same again with AI.

Shubham Saboo

679,347 次观看 • 2 年前

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10

Command Code

913,825 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now

Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now

GMI Cloud

116,538 次观看 • 4 个月前

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

hiraeth

40,821 次观看 • 1 个月前

Running a real-time experiment on Julius: Which model can find mag 7 financial data and create a dashboard from it faster and more effectively - Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5? Which do you think is Model A and which is Model B?

Running a real-time experiment on Julius: Which model can find mag 7 financial data and create a dashboard from it faster and more effectively - Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5? Which do you think is Model A and which is Model B?

Julius AI

159,342 次观看 • 4 个月前

FREE Claude Opus 4.8. FREE GPT 5.5. All free. 7,200 credits. I tested it myself - works. The platform is Gumloop(.)com. Chat interface plus connections into different services. Company raised $50M Here's the exact setup: → Register via Google OAuth or Microsoft OAuth → During onboarding, answer the questions and select every option you can → When asked to connect services, pick Apify, Semrush, and Reducto - no login needed for any of them → Skip the Slack connection → Done correctly, you land 7,200 credits minimum Models inside: Opus 4.6 through 4.8, GPT 5.3 Codex, GPT 5.4, GPT 5.5, Gemini 3 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro, Kimi K2.6. No card needed anywhere in this flow. I ran through it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before it gets patched.

FREE Claude Opus 4.8. FREE GPT 5.5. All free. 7,200 credits. I tested it myself - works. The platform is Gumloop(.)com. Chat interface plus connections into different services. Company raised $50M Here's the exact setup: → Register via Google OAuth or Microsoft OAuth → During onboarding, answer the questions and select every option you can → When asked to connect services, pick Apify, Semrush, and Reducto - no login needed for any of them → Skip the Slack connection → Done correctly, you land 7,200 credits minimum Models inside: Opus 4.6 through 4.8, GPT 5.3 Codex, GPT 5.4, GPT 5.5, Gemini 3 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro, Kimi K2.6. No card needed anywhere in this flow. I ran through it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before it gets patched.

Atenov int.

24,443 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Fable 5 created this horror game with the same prompt we tested Fusion on. Do not fall for OpenRouters fraudulent marketing scheme. The capability of Fusion is NO WHERE close to that of Fable 5. Stringing together Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and DeepSeek V4 does not give you a better model. OpenRouter should be sued for false marketing.

Claude Fable 5 created this horror game with the same prompt we tested Fusion on. Do not fall for OpenRouters fraudulent marketing scheme. The capability of Fusion is NO WHERE close to that of Fable 5. Stringing together Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and DeepSeek V4 does not give you a better model. OpenRouter should be sued for false marketing.

BridgeMind

31,098 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Pro Output on the same ballister prompt > it added hell lot of features and function > but you can see everything is just lazy skeleton , no details > this problem of gemini is not yet fixed and one bad news they GPTified the ui in webdev

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Pro Output on the same ballister prompt > it added hell lot of features and function > but you can see everything is just lazy skeleton , no details > this problem of gemini is not yet fixed and one bad news they GPTified the ui in webdev

Chetaslua

94,715 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Flash checkpoint notes: The old “cool Gemini UI” vibe feels mostly gone. It is more GPTified now. Good: fast, smart for a Flash model. Bad: it keeps filling websites with HUDs/panels, even when the prompt asks for restraint. Biggest issue: prompt adherence. I told it multiple times not to use web, and it still did. Because of that, exact knowledge cutoff is hard to verify confidently.

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Flash checkpoint notes: The old “cool Gemini UI” vibe feels mostly gone. It is more GPTified now. Good: fast, smart for a Flash model. Bad: it keeps filling websites with HUDs/panels, even when the prompt asks for restraint. Biggest issue: prompt adherence. I told it multiple times not to use web, and it still did. Because of that, exact knowledge cutoff is hard to verify confidently.

Chetaslua

127,743 次观看 • 4 个月前

Fable 5.5 is pretty great, did this in a few hours on the chat version on high with minimal prompts 21 worlds, 3D versions, 21 bosses with different mechanics, leaderboard Try it out! Video made by Claude too ofc

Fable 5.5 is pretty great, did this in a few hours on the chat version on high with minimal prompts 21 worlds, 3D versions, 21 bosses with different mechanics, leaderboard Try it out! Video made by Claude too ofc

Emad

17,719 次观看 • 8 天前

We asked Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra, and Gemini 3.8 Flash to write a video prompt from the same brief. All rendered with Seedance 2.5 on each::labs. Which one is your favorite? ⤵

We asked Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra, and Gemini 3.8 Flash to write a video prompt from the same brief. All rendered with Seedance 2.5 on each::labs. Which one is your favorite? ⤵

each::labs

120,923 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

BridgeMind

19,020 次观看 • 4 个月前

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

58,090 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Sonnet 3.5 transforms a simple PDF earnings report into an interactive dashboard in just 30 seconds. It goes beyond the capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, Llama and other existing LLMs. Future of work will 10x more productive with AI.

Claude Sonnet 3.5 transforms a simple PDF earnings report into an interactive dashboard in just 30 seconds. It goes beyond the capabilities of GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, Llama and other existing LLMs. Future of work will 10x more productive with AI.

Shubham Saboo

351,266 次观看 • 2 年前